Local Plan Large Development Sites Consultation Whitehill & Bordon

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Local Plan Large Development Sites Consultation Whitehill & Bordon 11/26/2019 Mail - Woodgate, Jenny - Outlook Local Plan large Development Sites Consultation Whitehill & Bordon Tue 15/10/2019 20:04 To: EHDC - Local Plan <[email protected]> 3 attachments (21 KB) EHDC.Bordon.Letter.15.10.19..docx; EHDC.Bordon.Questions.15.10.19..docx; .EHDC.Letter.15.10.19..docx; Dear EHDC Local Plan I enclose three documents attached being: 1. Comments on the proposed Development of Bordon in letter form 2. Response to your questionnaire for Whitehill and Bordon 3. A letter about Standford Grange Farm (SA8) which is included under question 9 since it is linked to the developments on Bordon and Whitehill Yours truly https://outlook.office.com/mail/none/id/AAMkADIxNjE3NWJlLTMxYmEtNDEwZC1iOGM4LTYxOTllYjNmN2MzZQBGAAAAAABrEkrzGtHSSpsf0nN… 1/1 Local Plan Consultation, EHDC by email LARGE DEVELOPMENT SITES CONSULTATION PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT OF WHITEHILL AND BORDON The real objection to these new developments in Bordon and Whitehill is that it is currently in the grip of a major development, the Ecotown, and so one cannot assess the impact of the existing development (eg on infrastructure) because it is still being built. Therefore it is impossible to assess these future major proposals. Whitehill and Bordon have been in a state of almost continuous development since the 1980s. The history of this is as follows: 1. In 1866 there was a settlement over a dispute of common rights in Woolmer Forest (which then and still (in part) goes up to Broxhead Common), and parcels of land were given to some 500 claimants in the low-lying area (Deadwater), Whitehill and along the Hogmoor Road. The rest of the Forest in Bordon was kept by the Crown. This was run as a producing forest until 1892 or later. 2. In about 1908 the Army moved the Camp up from Greatham. The camp was enlarged in World War I and II. 3. In the 1920s people moving back from the Empire built new houses in Hindhead and Grayshott. Less well off people settled in Headley. The Sergeants and other lower classes built bungalows in Whitehill. But nobody built houses in Bordon/Deadwater, even though the land was in the public domain. 4. By 1969 the population of Bordon village was about 1800 people, mainly around the foot of Chalet Hill. The red light district (camp followers) was where the Forest Centre is, and the rest was shacky chicken farms and junk yards. This is Bordon phase I 5. In the 1970s the HCC proposed to build a town of 40,000 people from Bordon up to Ludshot Common. They made bore holes and conducted surveys. Headley people united to fight this strongly, and eventually they abandoned this for in-filling Bordon/Deadwater up to Whitehill, which brought the population up to 13,000 - some infilling. Bordon Phase II was built in the 1980s and 90s and had a certain logic. Shops schools and housing were all on the East side of the A325 so that children did not have to cross the main road. Business parks were on the West side. 6. However, Bordon Phase II was not a success. Despite being joined up, Bordon and Whitehill never jelled. Bordon/Deadwater was a different environment and attracted a lower socio- economic class (the poor are forced to live in the most unpleasant areas), and they continued to be separate. 7. The Ecotown plans recognised this failure, and proposed major developments ( now taking place) to make Bordon a success. However the signs are not encouraging. For example, local people there are furious about what is happening: The Chase Hospital is being closed (as the Town gets larger!!). There are almost no buses (none to Basingstoke Hospital). There is no bank and high rents of business premises which small business men cannot afford. There is bad planning with houses up to the roads, cars parked on the roads, poor construction, bad design, and bad roads (people use the Hogmoor Road more than the new Relief Road!) Most local people think that the Ecotown is turning into a disaster. Whether it really is or not only time will tell. But the chance of success seems small, especially since the people running the show are all outsiders, who one resident described as 8. The proposal to build 1800 more houses in these circumstances, is not carefully considered. It is impossible to judge their impact since we don't know the impact of the present developments. 9. The omens are not hopeful, with 2 1/2 failures so far, why should Bordon Phase IV be any different? Conclusions All future developments of Bordon and Whitehill should be put on hold until the present developments have been completed and allowed to bed in for several years, to see whether Phase III is a success or failure. Any future developments should not be organised nor managed by the same people/contractors who are currently running the present show and making the residents so angry. Yours truly Consultation Questionnaire East Hants Local Plan Large Developments sites Bordon and Whitehill 1: Do you have any comments on the proposed uses? When the Army left Bordon in 2015, about 400 local people lost their jobs. What the area needed then, and still needs, is jobs. (Jobs bring prosperity and amenities - houses just cost money to maintain.) Despite this, about 3000 new houses were approved by the Inquiry, even though they were not needed then. So the additional 1800 houses (Bordon-Whitehill 1284 + 360 on Standford Grange Farm + 150 on mill Chase School = 1794). being proposed, are not needed either. Houses without jobs causes loss of dignity, stress, and commuting by car (since no train and buses almost non-existent) which kills animals on roads and causes global warming. So Whitehill- Bordon is an environment disaster, and the people who live there have difficult lives. 2: What infrastructure is required to support the proposal and when? This could be on or off- site provision. Bordon has been in an almost continuous state of development since the 1980s (see my attached letter for details). In fact the Ecotown is still being built, and so it is impossible to judge the impact of these new proposals. However, the following are obvious. The road system is being challenged. the bus services are severely inadequate; the health system is deficient: the Chase hospital is being closed and there are no buses to Basingstoke Hospital. There are not enough GPs, and the waiting time to see a GP is 4 weeks. Furthermore, there is Lyme disease in the Bordon area - I know of several cases, and TB and respiratory illnesses in the low-lying areas. There is no Bank, and rents are too high - I know of several small businesses who have problems because of this. 3: Do you know of any other constraints to developing the site? Please provide detail and evidence. North East Hampshire is a rural area of Forests (Woolmer and Alice Holt), home of the National Trust (Waggoner's Wells), Gilbert White (Selborne), and Jane Austen (Chawton). Bordon is within a few miles of these places. Yet it is being developed in a headlong fashion, without any consideration to the consequences for the surrounding areas, with their sunken lanes and beauty sports and history. 4: What opportunities and/or benefits do you think the proposal could bring. Please explain how. Bordon has always been a failure, and so these latest proposals could be the development which breaks the camels back. Then eventually there might be an inquiry into these serial failures (4 by then), and people will realise that the real problem is in the environment. 5: What are the cross-boundary considerations and the potential implications? How can they be overcome? The National Park seems to be creating a "them-and-us" situation. Instead of development taking place organically over the whole area, it is being frozen in some areas, and aggressive over- development forced in other areas, such as Bordon. There is also the problem of the annexation of 150 acres of the separate parish of Headley and the incorporation of Hollywater and Standford into Bordon. The site promoters consider their proposal to be deliverable within the Local Plan period up to 2036. 6: Is there any reason that this is not achievable? People who have moved to Bordon recently are already moving away. Eventually this will become a disaster and bring an end to development. 7: Is there any other Large Development Site that could deliver over 600 homes and other supporting uses by 2036, that is not included in this consultation? This obsession with housing is misguided. First you create jobs, then houses, otherwise not. Now that we are leaving the EU, this will also reduce pressure on housing. 8: Do you have any comments on the assessment of Large Development Sites, as set out in the Council’s background paper? <link> Too complicated - I don't understand this 9: Do you have any comments on the relationship between Large Development Sites and the draft Local Plan (2017-2036), particularly in relation to what other policies and proposals the draft Local Plan should contain? The plans for Whitehill-Bordon are linked to a 150 acre SANG on the Standford Grange Farm (which is in Headley) which together with Mill Chase School has 510 houses proposed, yet these have been excluded from the consultation. Why? We present detailed objections to these developments in a separate letter. 10: Is there any feedback you would like to give us about this consultation? This consultation is not really a proper consultation: i. Key parts of the development of Bordon, namely the SANG on Standford Grange Farm, have been omitted.
Recommended publications
  • Strategic Flood Risk Assessment: Interim Supplement Incorporating Sequential Test
    Strategic Flood Risk Assessment: Interim Supplement Incorporating Sequential Test For the East Hampshire District Local Plan Regulation 18 consultation December 2018 SFRA Interim Supplement 2018 Contents 1.0 Introduction 2.0 Background 3.0 Local Flood Risk Context 4.0 Planning Context 5.0 Site Requiring Sequential/Exception Test 6.0 Conclusion Appendix 1 – Sequential Testing Scoring on LAA sites and sites brought forward from the development plan Appendix 2 – Sequential Test Methodology and Scoring Criteria Appendix 3 – A list of sites with planning permission 1.0 Introduction 1.1 This document supplements the East Hampshire Level 1 Strategic Flood Risk Assessment (SFRA), October 2018 and supports the East Hampshire Local Plan 2017–2036 (Regulation 18 consultation). The purpose of this document is to demonstrate that proposed site allocations in areas of flood risk are appropriate in the context of the Sequential Test which are required as part of the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) and its accompanying National Planning Practice Guidance (NPPG). However, as this is the first public consultation on the East Hampshire draft Local Plan, the Exception Test has not been carried out at this stage (Regulation 18) as allocations may be subject to change. Those allocations that may require an Exception Test prior to the Proposed Submission Local Plan 2017-2036 (Regulation 19) will be carried out at that time. 1.2 The East Hampshire Local Plan covers the area of East Hampshire outside of the South Downs National Park. This area is known as the Planning Authority area (the ‘Area’). The SFRA 2018 therefore covers the Planning Authority area only but during its preparation neighbouring authorities were consulted to address any cross boundary flood issues to inform the SFRA.
    [Show full text]
  • Sites of Importance for Nature Conservation Sincs Hampshire.Pdf
    Sites of Importance for Nature Conservation (SINCs) within Hampshire © Hampshire Biodiversity Information Centre No part of this documentHBIC may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recoding or otherwise without the prior permission of the Hampshire Biodiversity Information Centre Central Grid SINC Ref District SINC Name Ref. SINC Criteria Area (ha) BD0001 Basingstoke & Deane Straits Copse, St. Mary Bourne SU38905040 1A 2.14 BD0002 Basingstoke & Deane Lee's Wood SU39005080 1A 1.99 BD0003 Basingstoke & Deane Great Wallop Hill Copse SU39005200 1A/1B 21.07 BD0004 Basingstoke & Deane Hackwood Copse SU39504950 1A 11.74 BD0005 Basingstoke & Deane Stokehill Farm Down SU39605130 2A 4.02 BD0006 Basingstoke & Deane Juniper Rough SU39605289 2D 1.16 BD0007 Basingstoke & Deane Leafy Grove Copse SU39685080 1A 1.83 BD0008 Basingstoke & Deane Trinley Wood SU39804900 1A 6.58 BD0009 Basingstoke & Deane East Woodhay Down SU39806040 2A 29.57 BD0010 Basingstoke & Deane Ten Acre Brow (East) SU39965580 1A 0.55 BD0011 Basingstoke & Deane Berries Copse SU40106240 1A 2.93 BD0012 Basingstoke & Deane Sidley Wood North SU40305590 1A 3.63 BD0013 Basingstoke & Deane The Oaks Grassland SU40405920 2A 1.12 BD0014 Basingstoke & Deane Sidley Wood South SU40505520 1B 1.87 BD0015 Basingstoke & Deane West Of Codley Copse SU40505680 2D/6A 0.68 BD0016 Basingstoke & Deane Hitchen Copse SU40505850 1A 13.91 BD0017 Basingstoke & Deane Pilot Hill: Field To The South-East SU40505900 2A/6A 4.62
    [Show full text]
  • Whitehill & Bordon Eco-Town Traffic Management Strategy Hampshire
    Whitehill & Bordon Eco-town Traffic Management Strategy Hampshire County Council February 2013 QM Issue/revision Revision 1 Revision 2 Revision 3 Revision 4 Remarks SECOND DRAFT FINAL DRAFT FINAL REPORT FINAL REPORT Date 16/03/12 13/04/12 17/09/2012 19/02/2013 Prepared by Chris Williams Chris Williams Chris Williams Chris Williams Signature Chris Williams Chris Williams Chris Williams Chris Williams Checked by Nigel Wilkinson Nigel Wilkinson Nigel Wilkinson Peter Day Signature Nigel Wilkinson Nigel Wilkinson Nigel Wilkinson Peter Day Authorised by Peter Day Peter Day Peter Day Peter Day Signature Peter Day Peter Day Peter Day Project number 11581409 11581409 11581409 11581409 File reference J:\11581407 - Whitehill Bordon - Traffic Management Study\TEXT\REPORTS\Whitehill & Bordon Eco-town TM Strategy - February 2013 WSP UK Limited Mountbatten House Basing View Basingstoke Hampshire RG21 4HJ Tel: +44 (0)1256 318800 Fax: +44 (0)1256 318700 http://www.wspgroup.com WSP UK Limited | Registered Address WSP House, 70 Chancery Lane, London, WC2A 1AF, UK | Reg No. 01383511 England | WSP Group plc | Offices worldwide Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 1 Preamble and Background 3 2 National and Local Policy Context 5 3 Eco-town Proposals 9 4 Data Collection 17 5 Town & Parish Council / Public Consultation 23 6 Summary of Existing Concerns 26 7 Option Evaluation 40 8 Proposed Traffic Management Strategy 50 9 Summary & Conclusions Traffic Management Strategy 77 Appendices Appendix A – Phase 1 Consultation Meetings Minutes and Correspondence Appendix B – Phase 2 Consultation Minutes and Correspondence Appendix C – Phase 3 Consultation Responses Appendix D – Matrix of Traffic Management Measures Executive Summary The aim of this study is to develop a Traffic Management Strategy that will provide practical and deliverable strategies for the implementation of physical and softer measures to reduce the impact of the Eco-town proposals on local villages and communities, and to discourage the use by traffic of inappropriate routes.
    [Show full text]
  • HAMPSHIRE Two Buildings on the Isle of Wight Are Included Below the Table for Hampshire
    Tree ring dated buildings © VAG 2021 INDEX OF TREE-RING DATED BUILDINGS IN ENGLAND COUNTY LIST approximately in chronological order, revised to VA51 (2020). © Vernacular Architecture Group 2021 These files may be copied for personal use, but should not be published or further distributed without written permission from the Vernacular Architecture Group. Always access these tables via the VAG website. Unauthorised copies released without prior consent on search engines may be out of date and unreliable. Since 2016 a very small number of construction date ranges from historical sources have been added. These entries are entirely in italics. Before using the index you are recommended to read or print the introduction and guidance, which includes a key to the abbreviations used on the tables HAMPSHIRE Two buildings on the Isle of Wight are included below the table for Hampshire. County – Felling date Placename Address VA ref Description / keywords NGR Historic range HE ref and later Other refs Hamps 1244 -1249 Hambledon Manor Farm 30.106 Oxf Bishop’s house. Stone. This date is for floor joists, but they might not be in a primary SU 646151 context. Also see 1473 -78. Hamps 1248 + Bentworth Hall Place 39.135 Oxf Aisled hall. Date from arcade plate in hall range was1248 +, but primary timbers in SU 663399 porch dated 1295 -1327 (qv) Hamps 1249 1250 Wherwell The Old Stables, 27.99 Oxf Guest hall or infirmary. Raised aisle roof 8.23m wide. Mortice & tenoned straight arch- SU 392406 Wherwell Priory (1) braces up to tiebeam and arcade braces; passing braces, notched lap joints, ashlar pieces? (not shown in Fig 1.8 in Roberts), splayed and tabled scarf.
    [Show full text]
  • Minutes of HAA Executive Meeting 2012 Page 1 of 12
    Hampshire Archery Association Chairman: Mrs Margaret Taylor, 34 North End Grove, Portsmouth, Hampshire, PO8 2NG Secretary: Mrs Pauline Hunton, 1 Old Barn Close, North Waltham, Hampshire, RG25 2BW Treasurer: Mrs Louise Belbin, 50 Coulsdon Road, Hedge End, Hampshire, SO30 0JR Minutes of HAA Annual General Meeting Held on 22th March 2012 in the Hedge End Youth and Community Association Hall, St Johns Road, Hedge End, Southampton Meeting commenced 8p.m. Officers present: President Paul Eden A C Delco Bowmen Life Vice President & Treasurer Louise Belbin A C Delco Bowmen Chairman Margaret Taylor Portsdown Archery Club Secretary Pauline Hunton Old Basing Archers Target Team Manager Gill Millward Waterside Archers Target Tournament Secretary Phil Collins Waterside Archers Records Officer David Strong Petersfield SCAS Rep Ciaran Finn Standford Archers County Coaching Organiser Nigel Slocombe Yateley Archers Child Protection Officer Lionel Shepherd Alton & Four Marks Equipment Officer Adrian Dawes Waterside Archers Members present: Libby Eden A C Delco Bowmen Trevor Smith Sway Bowmen Peter Hunton Old Basing Archers Alison Smith Sway Bowmen Rachel McCrea Merdon Bowmen Carla Piper Southampton AC Julian Piper Southampton AC Helen Press Andover Archers Dawn Gore Tenzone Bowmen Abbie Loader Andover Archers Pauline Pillans Petersfield Nick Loader Andover Archers Alan Holden Standford Archers Carol Betts AC Delco Bowmen Ashley Holden Standford Archers Tim Betts AC Delco Bowmen Gary Carr AC Delco Bowmen John McCrea Merdon Bowmen Phil Butler AC Delco Bowmen
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction from Whitehill Town Council
    Whitehill Town Council and Whitehill & Bordon Regeneration Company Wednesday 23rd September 2020 Pre-recorded interview with community questions www.whitehilltowncouncil.gov.uk Cllr Andy Tree, Leader of Whitehill Town Council (left) interviews James Child, Project Lead, Whitehill & Bordon Regeneration Company. Introduction from Whitehill Town Council Dear residents, Following the local election in May 2019, we committed to improving communication between those in power and residents. We have hosted ‘public interest’ meetings with the Whitehill & Bordon Regeneration Company, NHS CCG and Police. Sadly, Covid restrictions mean we currently cannot hold such meetings, but this does not stop us asking questions and seeking answers. Thank you to everyone who sent in questions over email or through Facebook. We did not guarantee that every individual question would be answered but I asked the regeneration company to answer them all, with the answers given in this document and reference to the full list questions asked as Appendix A at the end of this document. As your most local ‘grassroots’ council covering Whitehill & Bordon, we do not control the development but we can fight to ensure your voice is heard. Cllr Andy Tree Leader of Whitehill Town Council 1 Update from Whitehilll & Bordon Regeneration Company (WBRC) on questions raised at Town Council-hosted ‘Public Interest’ Question & Answers (Q&A) meeting with WBRC held on 6th Feb 2020 This section highlights issues which remain unresolved since the quarterly meeting in February. Please read the responses below together with the Q&A from the meeting. It is a record of progress over the past 8 months. We have delivered in this timescale the following: • Café Hogmoor, Beehive education facility and toilets, • SANG car park • Reopened BOSC Pavilion and resumed cricket after lockdown.
    [Show full text]
  • Various Roads East Hampshire No.3 Notice 2
    TEMPORARY ROAD CLOSURES – VARIOUS ROADS IN EAST HAMPSHIRE NO. 3 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that Hampshire County Council has made an order to allow for Operation Resilience works on the highway to be undertaken as follows: ROADS TO BE CLOSED: those parts of the following roads – 1. Church Lane, Empshott between its junction with Selborne Road and its junction with Empshott Road. 2. Brick Kiln Lane, West Tisted between its junction with A32 Fareham Road and its junction with Brewers Lane. 3. High Street (Service Road), Alton between its junction with High Street and its termination at end of the road. 4. Crowley Drive, Alton between its junction with Ashdell Road and its junction with Windmill Hill. 5. B3002 Headley Road, Grayshott between its junction with Boundary Road and its junction with School Road. 6. Petersfield Road, Bordon between its junction with Blackmoor Road and its junction with Princes Close. 7. London Road, Liphook between its roundabout junction with Portsmouth Road / Longmoor Road / Headley Road and its junctions with London Road and Childerstone Close. 8. Haslemere Road, Liphook between its roundabout junction with Portsmouth Road and a point 50 metres east of Chiltlee Manor Estate. 9. Midhurst Road, Liphook between its roundabout junction with Haslemere Road and its junctions with Court Close. 10. Portsmouth Road, Liphook between its roundabout junction with Longmoor Road / Headley Road / London Road and its junction Larch Close. 11. Headley Road, Liphook between its roundabout junction with Portsmouth Road / Longmoor Road / London Road and its junction with The Grove. 12. Longmoor Road, Liphook between its roundabout junction with Headley Road / London Road / Portsmouth Road and its junction with Victoria Way.
    [Show full text]
  • Sustainability Appraisal (SA) of the Emerging East Hampshire Local Plan
    Sustainability Appraisal (SA) of the emerging East Hampshire Local Plan Interim SA Report December 2018 East Hampshire Local Plan SA Interim SA Report Quality information Prepared by Checked by Verified by Approved by Chris McNulty, Mark Fessey, Mark Fessey, Steve Smith, Environmental Planner Associate Associate Technical Director Mark Fessey, Kevin Thurlow, Associate, East Hants DC Kevin Thurlow, East Hants DC Prepared for: East Hampshire District Council Prepared by: AECOM Infrastructure & Environment UK Limited Aldgate Tower 2 Leman Street London E1 8FA United Kingdom aecom.com © 2018 AECOM Infrastructure & Environment UK Limited. All Rights Reserved. This document has been prepared by AECOM Infrastructure & Environment UK Limited (“AECOM”) in accordance with its contract with East Hampshire District Council (the “Client”) and in accordance with generally accepted consultancy principles and the established budget. Any information provided by third parties and referred to herein has not been checked or verified by AECOM, unless otherwise expressly stated in the document. AECOM shall have no liability to any third party that makes use of or relies upon this document. AECOM East Hampshire Local Plan SA Interim SA Report Table of Contents 1. Introduction ...................................................................................................... 1 2. What is the plan seeking to achieve? .............................................................. 3 3. What is the scope of the SA? .........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • ITEM 5 Table 8A) 1 PROPOSED HAMPSHIRE COUNTY COUNCIL
    ITEM 5 Table 8a) PROPOSED HAMPSHIRE COUNTY COUNCIL TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT PROGRAMME 2011/2012 EAST HAMPSHIRE TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT PROGRAMME (ROLLING) 2011/2012 – programme value £95200 Subject to the level of funding and resource available. LOCATION SCHEME NAME AND DETAIL STATUS LOCAL WORKS MEMBER/S ALLOCATION GENERAL TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT WORK Routine enquiries Dealing with enquiries from all sources such as All 0 the general public, Members, police, district councils and parish councils. Approx 100 per week, 40 hours per week, equating to around 50% of the teams workforce. Implementation of speed limit To be funded separately All 0 changes recommended from A and B roads review. Contribution to the Casualty Contribute to the investigation of all fatal and All 0 Reduction Partnership. potential fatal accidents in liaison with Police, District Officers and Safety Engineering Team. Further reactive traffic management Reactive schemes not currently included within All 5000 works. the traffic management programme. S278 Audits Assessment of schemes being constructed by All 0 developers under section 278 of the Highways Act in terms of traffic management. 1 ITEM 5 Table 8a) WHOLE DISTRICT SCHEMES Those marked *** are not reserved matters and could be delivered through a district Agency Agreement. East Hampshire Civil Parking Application to DfT being drafted for wide All 25000 Enforcement (Application to DfT, consultation. Consultant being appointed via project team involvement plus sign EHDC to undertake sign and road marking and road marking review) review, amendments arising must be addressed by implementation date of December 2011. It is anticipated that this will require intensive attention by east TM staff for several months and may impact delivery of the TM programme.
    [Show full text]
  • Strategic Objectives
    Draft local plan 2017-2036 (regulation 18) Consultation 5 February - 19 March 2019 YOUR LOCAL PLAN 2036 Foreword A FRONT DOOR FOR EVERYONE That is the challenge we face as a society - we need enough homes for everyone - and it is the most pressing and urgent task we have, and at East Hampshire District Council we are determined to play our part in providing those homes. The challenge we have set ourselves is to produce a Local Plan that provides homes and jobs but also protects and enhances the area’s character, natural and built environment, wildlife, and heritage assets for future generations to enjoy. We want to make sure that high quality homes, fit for today’s needs and ready for the future, are built in the best possible locations, in order to create strong communities with all the supporting infrastructure and amenities modern living demands. That is quite a challenge! We all need and want our own space in which to live. A place where we can close the door and enjoy our own private space to raise a family, invite friends, be alone and to feel safe and secure. We recognise that being without your own space has a most corrosive effect on our ability to function in society, to maximise our potential, provide for families and older people and even on our mental health. So, in line with our motto “Improving People’s Lives” and our corporate focus on our residents’ welfare, we believe that our aim of “A Front Door for Everyone” is both a necessary and an achievable objective.
    [Show full text]
  • Hampshire Days Hampshire D a Ys
    THIS EDITION IS LIMITED TO COPIES FOR SALE IN ENGLAND, IOO FOR SALE IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, AND 35 PRESENTATION COPIES THE COLLECTED WORKS V W. H. HUDSON IN TWENTY-FOUR VOLUMES HAMPSHIRE DAYS HAMPSHIRE D A YS BY W. H. HUDSON MCMXXIII LONDON y TORONTO J. M. DENT & SONS LTD. NEW YORK: E. P. DUTTON G? CO. All rights ríserved PRINTBD IN CREAT BRITAIN INSCRIBED TO SIR EDWARD AND LADY GREY NORTHUMBRIANS WITH HAMPSHIRE WRITTEN IN THEIR HEARTS CONTENTS PAGE Chapter I. ....... i Autumn in the New Forest—Red colour in mammals— November mildness—A house by the Boldre—An ideal spot for small birds—Abundance of nests—Small mammals and the weasel’s part—Voles and mice— Homet and bank-vole—Young shrews—A squirrel’s visit—Green woodpecker's drumming-tree—Drumming of other species—Beauty of great spotted woodpecker— The cuckoo controversy—A cuckoo in a robin’s nest — Behaviour of the cuckoo — Extreme imtability— Manner of ejecting eggs and birds from the nest—Loss of imtability—Insensibility of the parent robins— Discourse on mistaken kindness, pain and death in nature, the annual destruction of bird life, and the young cuckoo's instinct. Chapter II. ........ 29 Between the Boldre and the Exe—Abuse of the New Forest —Character of the population—New Forest code and conscience—A radical change foreshadowed—Tenacity of the Forest fly—Oak woods of Beaulieu—Swallow and pike—Charm of Beaulieu—Instinctive love of open spaces—A fragrant heath—Nightjars—Snipe—Red- shanks—Pewits—Cause of sympathy with animáis— Grasshopper and spider — A rapacious fly — Melan- choly moods—Evening on the heath—“ World-strange- ness”—Pixie mounds—Death and burial—The dead in the barrows—Their fear of the living.
    [Show full text]
  • Village Magazine £2 Where Sold Delivered Free to Every House in Holybourne & Neatham Summer 2020
    Holybournewww.holybourne.com &Neatham Village Magazine £2 where sold Delivered free to every house in Holybourne & Neatham Summer 2020 A Ward Sister’s Story VE Day 75 The Prince of Wales BUMPER ISSUE! Holybourne2 Summer 2020 www.holybourne.com &Neatham Village Magazine triplefff.com 01420 561422 | [email protected] 3 Magpie Works, Station Approach, Four Marks, Hampshire, GU34 5HN triplefbrewery @triplefbrewer triplefbrewery Brewery Tours Do something dierent or better still, buy a Brewery Tour as a gift! Our tours include a half pint of any Triple f beer available at the time, to drink as our Brewer walks you through our brewery. Two further half pints can be enjoyed in our onsite bar afterwards. Vouchers are available online, by giving us a call or popping into our onsite shop. The Shop We stock an incredible selection of the best rated craft beers from around the world but if beers aren’t your thing then maybe our selection of artisan Gins, Rums, Vodkas, Whiskeys and more can tempt you. Opening times : Mon - Fri 9am-5pm • Sat 10am-2pm The Bar Our newly refurbished bar with roaring re, cosy snugs, booths and bar seating serves all our core beers plus our seasonal brews and guest ales. We have the best artisan spirits, mixers and a soft drinks menu that’ll make every non-drinker drool! We also have a guest cider each week as well as a bottled range from local producers. Opening times: Wed & Thur 5 - 9pm • Fri 3 - 9pm • Sat 12 - 9pm • Sun 12 - 9pm alto nomine 3.8% A.B.V.
    [Show full text]