DOCSLIB.ORG

Northwest Louisiana Mega Projects

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Northwest Louisiana Mega Projects NORTHWEST LOUISIANA MEGA PROJECTS Status Reports and Updates on the MEGA Projects for Caddo and Bossier Parishes July 01, 2019 The Northwest Louisiana Council of Governments (NLCOG) is the designated Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) for Caddo and Bossier Parishes in Northwest Louisiana. Since the passage of the Federal Highway Act of 1962, all metropolitan areas larger than 50,000 people must designate an MPO that is responsible for carrying out a continuing, cooperative, and comprehensive (3C) planning process to determine how best to invest federal transportation funding in the region. A major component of this 3C process is the development of a Long- Range Transportation Plan for the area including Visionary or MEGA Projects. The purpose of this document is to provide some basic background and status of those MEGA Projects for our region. Background information on transportation and infrastructure funding at the state level developed for the Governor's Task Force on Transportation Infrastructure Investment is also presented. The projects listed are not necessarily in order of priority. Northwest Louisiana MEGA Projects I-20 Maintenance and Improvements 3 I-49 Inner City Connector 7 I-69 Sections of Independent Utility 14, 15 & 16 19 Barksdale Gate Access Road I-220 @ I-20 Interchange Modifications 25 LA 511 - Jimmie Davis Bridge 31 Inner Loop Expressway (LA 3132) Extension 35 North Louisiana Passenger Rail 41 Transportation and Infrastructure Investments 45 Local Contacts 53 Page 1 of 51 This Page Left Blank Page 2 of 51 I-20 Maintenance and Improvements PROJECT DETAILS I-20 corridor is congested with vehicle traffic at many points, with conditions expected to worsen in the coming years. The Statewide Transportation Plan has identified 4 major projects along I-20 within District 04. Each of these projects consists of expansion of the existing 4-lane sections to 6- lane sections. A majority of this expansion can be done along with much needed maintenance improvements along the corridor. The general expansion will be through use of the existing rights- of-way by “stealing from the center” that is conversion of the grass medians to travel lanes. In addition to the expansion projects noted above funding for general maintenance of the existing facility is required. ISSUE Transportation agencies must balance the requirements of sustaining their existing system pavements and bridges against “modernization” improvements (safety, wider lanes, ITS) versus expansion investments (new construction, additional capacity). Under the state’s current Statewide Transportation Plan priority within the Mega Projects is given maintenance and improvements to our existing Interstate Highway System. States across the country have been dealing with similar dilemmas in recent years: Flat or declining federal aid, decreasing revenue from gas taxes, and a growing list of costly, overdue repairs to aging bridges, interstate highways and rail lines. Additional funding is greatly needed for the continued maintenance and development of our Interstate Highway Systems. SIGNIFICANCE Over the next 30 years, motor carriers will require a combination of infrastructure investments and policy strategies to operate efficiently and effectively. Policies and investments that benefit motor carriers can enhance safety and, improve level of service, which reduces the risk of accidents and increases productivity. The factors influencing the freight transportation system are constantly changing as cost, time and customer demands change. Changing technologies, economic conditions, shifts in supply chain methodologies, the availability of providers and the locations of users within the system, are constantly evolving as well. However, the need for access, mobility and good intermodal connections between regions and states is a constant CURRENT STATUS The projects identified in the Statewide Transportation Plan are as outlined below: Total ID Improvement Type Area Facility Limits Cost No. ($M) 23b Shreveport I-20 Red River Bridge (I-49, Shreveport to Widen to six lanes $135 Traffic Street, Bossier City) Page 3 of 51 Total ID Improvement Type Area Facility Limits Cost No. ($M) 23c Shreveport I-20 LA 3 to I-220 E Widen to six lanes $90 23a Shreveport I-20 TX State Line to I-220W Widen to six lanes $180 94 Bossier Webster I-20 I-220 E to Minden, LA Widen to six lanes $200 OUR POSITION We ask for your continued support for federal and state funding and ask the full cooperation for the development of each of these projects. We also support any additional funding that can be garnered for continued maintenance of our existing interstate system. An efficient, reliable and safe roadway system sets the conditions for supporting private sector development. To be economically competitive, industries must be able to get their products to the right place at the right time for the right price Page 4 of 51 Page 5 of 51 This Page Left Blank Page 6 of 51 I-49 Inner City Connector PROJECT DETAILS The Interstate 49 Inner City Connector (I-49 ICC) project is part of the I-49 Corridor which runs from Winnipeg, Canada to New Orleans, Louisiana. The I-49 ICC will be a new interstate facility approximately 3.6 miles in length. It is proposed to intersect Shreveport in order to connect I- 49 at the I-20 interchange with I-49 North at the I-220 interchange. ISSUE As authorized in the 1991 Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act (ISTEA) and subsequent reauthorizations, I- 49 is to be extended from Shreveport/Bossier, Louisiana to Kansas City Missouri. We have made great strides in completion of I-49 North from I-220 to the Louisiana Arkansas state line. This facility is open from LA 1 north to the state line with entire route from I-220 to the Arkansas line opening to traffic in the next year or so. The proposed action is the development of an interstate connector facility that will link downtown Shreveport at the current terminus of I-49 at I-20 with I- 220, the southern terminus of I-49 North. SIGNIFICANCE While this portion of the I-49 Corridor was defined as far back as 1976, lack of funding and community support has prevented further study and development of the route. The MPO completed a Comprehensive Stage 0 Feasibility Study for this section of I-49 and is in the process of completing an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the connector project. The primary purpose of this project is to provide improved connectivity between the existing I- 49/I-20 interchange and the I-49 N/I-220 interchange currently under construction. The project will reduce travel time and travel distance for those remaining on I-49 and provide a more direct access to downtown Shreveport, the Riverfront areas of Shreveport and Bossier City, the North Shreveport/Agurs Business Districts just north of downtown Shreveport, and the Allendale/Ledbetter neighborhoods. CURRENT STATUS Stage 1 EIS is underway. Our engineering consultants have developed and presented detailed environmental data for the study area and five alignments including four build-through alternatives and the fifth build alternative utilizing the Inner Loop LA 3132 from its juncture at I-49 and I-220 with its future juncture with I-49 North. Throughout this study process, NLCOG has held 24 public meetings in multiple locations, multiple days, and multiple times of day to provide the public with maximum opportunity to participate in the process. An Alternatives Decision Memorandum has been developed, reviewed by the Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development, the Louisiana Division office of the Federal Highway Administration, and has concurred with completing the Draft EIS with Build Alternative 1, Build Alternative 5 and the No Build Alternative. FHWA has also made two 4(f) determinations: (1) SWEPCO Park does not meet the significance requirement, and (2) Cross Lake is a Section 4(f) property. The NLCOG Metropolitan Planning Organization Transportation Policy Committee (MPO) unanimously passed a resolution on August 18, 2017 in support of Build Alternative 1 being recognized as the MPO Locally Preferred Alternative. A Final Draft of the Cultural Resources Survey has been submitted to LADOTD, and Louisiana Division of Federal Highways. The State Historic Preservation Office has issued comments back to DOTD on the Cultural Report. Those comments have been forwarded to the consulting team to be reviewed and addressed appropriately. A Draft Page 7 of 51 Preferred Alternative Identification Analysis has also been submitted to LADOTD, and FHWA for review. Once concurrence on these documents is given by DOTD and FHWA the draft EIS will be submitted to both entities for concurrence and then made available for public comment and formal Public Hearing on the project. See attached consultant update for current timeline. Cost Comparison Costs are in the process of being updated with current item costs associated with I-49 Segment K and contingencies. Build Alternative 1 – Fully elevated, 2 internal interchanges, 4 lanes $547M – Fully elevated, 2 internal interchanges, 6 lanes $640M Build Alternative 5** – Resurfacing and widening existing LA 3132 $832M – Reconstruction and widening existing LA 3132 $846M *Costs are NOT final **Salvaging part of the LA 3132 interchange is in both Build Alternative 5 options, but traffic maintenance costs are not. Louisiana House Bill 578 of the 2019 Regular Session appropriated $100 million to the project from the BP Oil spill settlement funds. OUR POSITION We ask for your continued support for federal and state funding and ask the full cooperation of the Federal Highway Administration to proceed quickly on this project. Please note that Northwest Louisiana also supports the efforts by those in South Louisiana to complete the entire interstate in Louisiana. Note there have been more than 24 public meetings held to date on this project. This does not include meetings with the Citizens Advisory Committee, the Pastoral council, neighborhood groups, civic groups, etc.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Arkansas Embarks on Its Largest Highway Construction Program
    Connecting Arkansas Program Arkansas embarks on its largest highway construction program CAP Locations CA0905 CA0903 CA0904 CA0902 CA1003 CA0901 CA0909 CA1002 CA0907 CA1101 CA0906 CA0401 CA0801 CA0803 CA1001 CA0103 CA0501 CA0101 CA0603 CA0605 CA0606/061377 CA0604 CA0602 CA0607 CA0608 CA0601 CA0704 CA0703 CA0701 CA0705 CA0702 CA0706 CAP Project CA0201 CA0202 CA0708 0 12.5 25 37.5 50 Miles The Connecting Arkansas Program (CAP) is the largest highway construction program ever undertaken by the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department (AHTD). Through a voter-approved constitutional amendment, the people of Arkansas passed a 10-year, half-cent sales tax to improve highway and infrastructure projects throughout the state. Job Job Name Route County Improvements CA0101 County Road 375 – Highway 147 Highway 64 Crittenden Widening CA0103 Cross County Line - County Road 375 Highway 64 Crittenden Widening CA0201 Louisiana State Line – Highway 82 Highway 425 Ashley Widening CA0202 Highway 425 – Hamburg Highway 82 Ashley Widening CA0401 Highway 71B – Highway 412 Interstate 49 Washington Widening CA0501 Turner Road – County Road 5 Highway 64 White Widening CA0601 Highway 70 – Sevier Street Interstate 30 Saline Widening CA0602 Interstate 530 – Highway 67 Interstates 30/40 Pulaski Widening and Reconstruction CA0603 Highway 365 – Interstate 430 Interstate 40 Pulaski Widening CA0604 Main Street – Vandenberg Boulevard Highway 67 Pulaski Widening CA0605 Vandenberg Boulevard – Highway 5 Highway 67 Pulaski/Lonoke Widening CA0606 Hot Springs – Highway
    [Show full text]
  • Highway 71 Improvement Study I Executive Summary This Page Intentionally Left Blank
    HIGHWAY 71 CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENT STUDY BELLA VISTA BYPASS – MISSOURI STATE LINE BENTON COUNTY Executive Summary DRAFT December 2017 Highway 71 Corridor Improvement Study Bella Vista Bypass to Missouri State Line BENTON COUNTY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Prepared by the Transportation Planning and Policy Division Arkansas Department of Transportation In cooperation with the Federal Highway Administration This report was funded in part by the Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation. The views and opinions of the authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the U.S. Department of Transportation. ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION NOTICE OF NONDISCRIMINATION The Arkansas Department of Transportation (Department) complies with all civil rights provisions of federal statutes and related authorities that prohibit discrimination in programs and activities receiving federal financial assistance. Therefore, the Department does not discriminate on the basis of race, sex, color, age, national origin, religion (not applicable as a protected group under the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration Title VI Program), disability, Limited English Proficiency (LEP), or low-income status in the admission, access to and treatment in the Department’s programs and activities, as well as the Department’s hiring or employment practices. Complaints of alleged discrimination and inquiries regarding the Department’s nondiscrimination policies may be directed to Joanna P. McFadden Section Head - EEO/DBE (ADA/504/Title VI Coordinator), P.O. Box 2261, Little Rock, AR 72203, (501) 569-2298, (Voice/TTY 711), or the following email address: [email protected] Free language assistance for the Limited English Proficient individuals is available upon request. This notice is available from the ADA/504/Title VI Coordinator in large print, on audiotape and in Braille.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 65, No. 233/Monday, December 4, 2000
    Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 233 / Monday, December 4, 2000 / Notices 75771 2 departures. No more than one slot DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION In notice document 00±29918 exemption time may be selected in any appearing in the issue of Wednesday, hour. In this round each carrier may Federal Aviation Administration November 22, 2000, under select one slot exemption time in each SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION, in the first RTCA Future Flight Data Collection hour without regard to whether a slot is column, in the fifteenth line, the date Committee available in that hour. the FAA will approve or disapprove the application, in whole or part, no later d. In the second and third rounds, Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the than should read ``March 15, 2001''. only carriers providing service to small Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. hub and nonhub airports may L. 92±463, 5 U.S.C., Appendix 2), notice FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: participate. Each carrier may select up is hereby given for the Future Flight Patrick Vaught, Program Manager, FAA/ to 2 slot exemption times, one arrival Data Collection Committee meeting to Airports District Office, 100 West Cross and one departure in each round. No be held January 11, 2000, starting at 9 Street, Suite B, Jackson, MS 39208± carrier may select more than 4 a.m. This meeting will be held at RTCA, 2307, 601±664±9885. exemption slot times in rounds 2 and 3. 1140 Connecticut Avenue, NW., Suite Issued in Jackson, Mississippi on 1020, Washington, DC, 20036. November 24, 2000. e. Beginning with the fourth round, The agenda will include: (1) Welcome all eligible carriers may participate.
    [Show full text]
  • Interstate 49: Origin, Planning, Construction
    Interstate 49: Origin, Planning, Construction Interstate 49 had its inception in the 1970s when business leaders and highway officials in Missouri, Arkansas and Louisiana began discussing the need for a new north-south interstate through the center of the United States. The new interstate would connect south-central Canada and the Gulf Coast in southern Louisiana and generate economic and safe- ty benefits in every state along the way. The goal was less congestion to improve the flow of goods and people and attract more commerce from businesses seeking to locate or expand in communities with an interstate highway nearby. With access only at interchanges and no more at-grade intersections, driving would be safer. In the mid-1970s, the Federal Highway Administration approved an interstate highway in western Louisiana to connect I-10 at Lafayette and I-20 at Shreveport, a distance of 212 miles. Construction in Louisiana began in the early 1980s and was completed in 1996. The first 32-mile segment of that 212 miles was completed in 1984 and became the first stretch of I-49 in the nation. In the meantime, Missouri and Arkansas officials were working to improve the U.S. 71 corridor to eventually achieve interstate highway standards. Arkansas built several segments, including what is known as I-540 between Bentonville and Fort Smith, which was opened to traffic in 1999. Starting in the 1970s, Missouri began the process of four-laning U.S. 71 south of Nevada, Mo. Into the 1980s,1990s and 2000s, projects included building four-lane freeway sections of U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • City of Shreveport a Great Place to Call Home 2018-2019 Economic Profile
    City of Shreveport A Great Place to Call Home 2018-2019 Economic Profile SHREVEPORT • CADDO PARISH • MSA OFFICE OF THE MAYOR SHREVEPORT, LOUISIANA Greetings and welcome to Shreveport! Shreveport serves as the economic driver and engine of our region We are proud to be home to LSU School of Medicine, one of America’s top-notch and is commonly called the Capital of the Ark-La-Tex. We are the academic schools that includes medicine, graduate studies, and allied health professions. third largest city in Louisiana, leading the community in progressive To meet the needs of our workforce development for business and industry, Northwest growth and development. Shreveport is the seat of Caddo Parish Louisiana Technical College offers extensive and customized vocational training and serves as the financial, medical, commercial, industrial, and programs. governmental hub of the Ark-La-Tex. Our city is definitely open for business, and the increasing number of businesses opening Our team is a one-stop assembly for all required planning, construction requirements, each month is evident. Shreveport is a city with nearly 200,000 residents, serving and processes. In addition to the support services offered through the Economic a metropolitan statistical area of more than 440,000. Development Department, all of the city’s departments are here to assist as well. Our centralized geographic location, situated at the crossroads of three major interstate I invite you to experience Shreveport firsthand and enjoy the clean air, the beautiful highways: I-20, I-49, and I-220, makes it an ideal commercial distribution hub in the scenery, and the many amenities that we have to offer.
    [Show full text]
  • Getting Around: Transportation and Mobility
    Getting Around: H 1 Transportation 2 3 and Mobility 4 4 5 5 6 7 8 8 9 10 11 12 13 personal vision statements: “Afamily-friendly,safe communitywitheasyaccess toschools,parks,libraries, shopping,andrestaurantsby car,publictransportation, bikes...andforpedestrians.” GREAT EXPECTATIONS: SHREVEPORT-CADDO 2030 MASTER PLAN 8 .1 8 | GETTING AROUND: TRANSPORTATION AND MOBILITY Chapter Summary hreveport has an extensive road network that allows motorists to access most areas in approximately twenty minutes. However, the cost of maintaining that network with a static population has proven to be difficult and continued extension of the road network Swill promote sprawl and strain budgets. This chapter focuses less on further expansion of the road network and more on integration of land use and transportation in order to provide opportunities for more transportation choice; improving maintenance and function of existing roadways; making travel more pleasant, attractive and environmentally sound through provision of amenities; and enhancing public transportation. Strategies and actions include: • Fix It First: develop a comprehensive pavement management program. • Integrate transportation and land use planning, technology and management strategies for efficient roadway and transit networks to provide alternatives to auto travel, and establish roadway impact fees. • Strengthen and enforce access management policies and ordinances. • Adopt context-sensitive design frameworks and a “Complete Streets” policy that integrates various transportation modes in regulations. • Improve conditions to encourage more trips by bicycle, walking and transit as part of the region’s ozone conformity plan. • Examine the feasibility of consolidating redundant and/or underperforming routes to add additional service on nearby principal routes, while developing system-wide standards for operational efficiency that will be used to make future decisions about route reductions, service enhancements, and long-range planning efforts for higher-frequency services like bus rapid transit (BRT).
    [Show full text]
  • America's Energy Corridor
    America’s Energy Corridor America’s Energy Corridor U.S. Highway 90— from Interstate 10 in Lafayette to The Westbank Expressway in New Orleans— is designated as “America’s Energy Corridor.” A Historical Overview 1987 Congress authorized and funded a demonstration study of a limited access highway in Lafayette. 1990 DOTD began a comprehensive EIS study of U.S.90/U.S. 167 Evangeline Thruway corridor in Lafayette 1991 Congress enacted the ISTEA – National Highway System – I-49 Named as NHS 1992 A draft EIS was approved for public distribution & withdrawn due to public opposition 1993 Lafayette Chamber & Lafayette Areawide Planning Commission convened an Arterial Task Force – Its final report identified Evangeline Thruway corridor as the most feasible. 1995 The National Highway System Designation Act identified the corridor from Lafayette to New Orleans as High Priority Corridor 37 1997 Governor Mike Foster established I-49 South Project Task Force to document the need, sources of funding and support for the upgrade of US-90 to interstate standards. 1997 DOTD reinitiated a new EIS project for the Connector 1998 Governor’s I-49 Task force submitted its report entitles Feasibility Analysis to Upgrade US 90 to I-49. The report outlined the need for the upgrade. 1998 Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century identified the corridor as “Future I-49.” The first sign was installed along the route. DOTD submitted HPC No. 1 Development Plan to Gov. Foster which identified possible projects along the route. 2002 The Final EIS for the Connector was released and a Record of Decision was issued.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix A- ASSETS and FREIGHT FLOW TECHNICAL MEMO
    Appendix A: Assets and Freight Flow Technical Memo Appendix A- ASSETS AND FREIGHT FLOW TECHNICAL MEMO Missouri State Freight Plan | Appendix A | Page 1 Appendix A: Assets and Freight Flow Technical Memo Assets and Freight Flow This technical memorandum provides an inventory of the existing freight assets and freight flows. The inventory includes all modes of freight transportation; highway, rail, air, water, and pipeline. It also includes an inventory of intermodal facilities where the different modes interact to exchange freight and the freight generators located within Missouri. For each of the modes of transportation a discussion of freight flows and forecasts is provided. Introduction Freight movement provides many economic benefits to the State through the shipment of parts to support production done in Missouri by Missouri workers, as well as, through the shipment of finished products moved both into and out of the State. The economic vitality of the State relies on transportation of goods into, out of, within, and to a lesser extent through Missouri to support jobs and growth throughout the State. The production and transporting goods are key elements to the economic vitality of Missouri. The top ten occupations in Missouri for 2012 are shown in Table A-1. Two key occupations (Production and Transportation) are listed for 2012. Production is at number four with 188,170 employees and Transportation at number six with 176,490 employees. Table A-1: 2012 Top Ten Occupations in Missouri Top Ten Occupations in Missouri (2012) Occupation Employees Office and Administrative Support 434,790 Sales 264,150 Food Preparation 244,770 Production 188,170 Healthcare 179,390 Transportation 176,490 Education 150,510 Missouri State Freight Plan | Appendix A | Page 2 Appendix A: Assets and Freight Flow Technical Memo Management 131,960 Financial 121,220 Installation and Maintenance 103,200 Source: U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Developing a Method for Estimating AADT on All Louisiana Roads
    Louisiana Transportation Research Center Final Report 548 Developing a Method for Estimating AADT on All Louisiana Roads by Xiaoduan Sun, Ph.D., P.E. Subasish Das University of Louisiana at Lafayette 4101 Gourrier Avenue | Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70808 (225) 767-9131 | (225) 767-9108 fax | www.ltrc.lsu.edu TECHNICAL REPORT STANDARD PAGE 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient's FHWA/LA.14/548 Catalog No. 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date Developing a Method for Estimating AADT on all July 2015 Louisiana Roads 6. Performing Organization Code LTRC Project Number: 14-3SA SIO Number: 30001700 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. Xiaoduan Sun, Ph.D., P.E. University of Louisiana at Lafayette Subasish Das 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering 11. Contract or Grant No. University of Louisiana at Lafayette LTRC No. 14-3SA Lafayette, LA 70504 SIO No. 30001700 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered Louisiana Department of Transportation and Final Report Development January 2014 – December 2014 P.O. Box 94245 Baton Rouge, LA 70804-9245 14. Sponsoring Agency Code 15. Supplementary Notes Conducted in Cooperation with the U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration Traffic flow volumes present key information needed for making transportation engineering and planning decisions. Accurate traffic volume count has many applications including: roadway planning, design, air quality compliance, travel model validation, and administrative purposes. Traffic counts also serve as an important input in highway safety performance evaluation. However, collecting traffic volume on all rural non-state roads has been very limited for various reasons, although these roads constitute a great portion (60 to 70%) of road mileage in the roadway network of any state in the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • East Arkansas Planning and Development District Thursday, December 12, 2019 Construction Program Updates
    Brad Smithee, P.E. District 10 Engineer East Arkansas Planning and Development District Thursday, December 12, 2019 Construction Program Updates 2 Interstate Rehabilitation Program Completed Number of Projects: 47 Miles: 291 Amount (Millions): $1,027 Interstate Rehabilitation Program Under Construction Number of Projects: 5 Miles: 53 Amount (Millions): $287 Let To Contract Number of Projects: 52 Miles: 344 Amount (Millions): $1,314 Interstate Rehabilitation Program Scheduled Number of Projects: 27 Miles: 160 Amount (Millions): $219 Total Program Number of Projects: 79 Miles: 504 Amount (Millions): $1,533 Connecting Arkansas Program $175 Million Scheduled $533 Million Completed $1.26 Billion Under Construction Arkansas Highway 18 Under Construction 2 Overpasses $25 Million Interstate 555 Under Construction 5 Miles 5 Bridges $34 Million Funding Updates 9 Act 416 Act 416 Summary Motor Fuel Tax $ 58 Million Electric and Hybrid Vehicle Registration Fees $ 2 Million Casino Revenue $ 35 Million Total to ARDOT $ 95 Million All for System Preservation, Pavements, Bridges, etc. Governor’s Long-Term Highway Funding Plan Proposed Constitutional Amendment General Election Ballot – November 2020 ½-Cent Sales Tax Permanent after SFY 2023 Will Continue to Provide $205 Million to ARDOT Annually Will Continue to Provide $43 Million to Cities Annually Will Continue to Provide $43 Million to Counties Annually Failure of the proposal at the polls will mean a reduction in funding to ARDOT, cities, and counties. Governor’s Long-Term Highway Funding Plan Plan Summary Act 416 of 2019 $ 95 Million (Immediate Funding dedicated to System Preservation) Proposed Amendment $205 Million (Funding for System Preservation plus Capital Projects beginning in SFY 2024) Total to ARDOT $300 Million Governor’s Long-Term Highway Funding Plan Benefits from Additional $300 Million Per Year Provide $8.2 Billion in Economic Activity over 10 Years* Support 3,596 Jobs Each Year* Maintain Interstates in a State of Good Repair Improve Approx.
    [Show full text]
  • Interstate 69
    American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 Transportation Investment Generating Economic Recovery Discretionary Grant Program Highway 71 - Bella Vista Bypass Project Type: Highway Project Location: Benton County, Arkansas (3rd Congressional District) McDonald County, Missouri (7th Congressional District) Area Type: Rural Grant Amount Requested: See Below Percentage of Total Project Cost Arkansas Segment Preliminary Engineering $6.8 million Right of Way and Utilities $23.0 million Roadway and Bridge Construction $199.0 million Toll Plaza and Customer Center $12.7 million Construction Construction Engineering $20.0 million Project Financing Costs $6.9 million TOTAL $268.4 million Innovative Strategies Incentive Bidding $10.0 million Safety Surface $3.5 million Green Vehicle Credit $4.6 million ITS Technologies $1.8 million Elderly Driver Credit $3.2 million Low-Income Credit $0.3 million INNOVATIVE STRATEGIES TOTAL $23.4 million ARKANSAS TOTAL COST $291.8 million 81% Missouri Segment Preliminary Engineering N/A Right of Way and Utilities $6.6 million Construction $55.4 million Construction Engineering $4.3 million MISSOURI TOTAL COST $66.3 million 19% TOTAL PROJECT COST $358.1 million 100% Project Financing Plan Arkansas Federal-aid and State Match $48.6 million Anticipated Toll Revenue Bonds $20.0 million Anticipated TIGER TIFIA Loan Proceeds $77.8 million Missouri Federal-aid and State Match $66.3 million PRELIMINARY FINANCING PLAN TOTAL $212.7 million 59% TOTAL TIGER GRANT FUNDS REQUESTED $145.4 million 41% ARRA TIGER GRANT REQUEST – Construction $122.0 million ARRA TIGER GRANT REQUEST – Innovation $23.4 million TOTAL PROJECT COST $358.1 million 100% PROJECT CONTACT: Scott Bennett, P.E.
    [Show full text]
  • Governor's Working Group on Highway Funding
    Governor’s Working Group on Highway Funding Scott E. Bennett, P.E. Director of Highways and Transportation So How Did We Get Here? • State Highways – 16,430 miles – 7,335 bridges – 25.1 billion vehicle miles traveled • County Roads – 68,658 miles – 4,304 bridges – 3.3 billion vehicle miles traveled • City Streets – 17,518 miles – 1,007 bridges – 5.6 billion vehicle miles traveled ArkansasHighways.com 2 State Highways, County Roads, City Streets Comparison MILES VEHICLE MILES TRAVELED (VMT) County Rd. State Highways 3.2 Billion VMT 16,430 miles 9% 16% City Streets City Streets 5.6 Billion VMT 17,518 miles 17% 17% County Roads State Highways 68,658 miles 25.1 Billion VMT 67% 74% ArkansasHighways.com 3 Highway User Revenue Distribution OTHER 4% OTHER Constitutional Officers Fund State Central Services Fund COUNTIES 3.2% 16% Other Miscellaneous 0.8% COUNTIES County Turnback Funds CITIES AHTD 13% 16% State Aid County Road Program 64% 3% CITIES City Turnback Funds 13% State Aid City Street Program 3% ArkansasHighways.com 4 So How Did We Get Here? • Federal Funding Uncertainty – Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century – Highway Trust Fund Shortfall • Delayed 75 projects totaling $335 Million • No 2015 Overlay Program – Inability to Match Federal-aid ArkansasHighways.com 5 Future State Funds Available to Match Federal Funds ArkansasHighways.com 6 Future State Funds Available for Overlay Programs ArkansasHighways.com 7 So How Did We Get Here? • For State Highways over the Next 10 Years – $20.4 Billion in Needs & Capital Improvements – $ 3.6
    [Show full text]