DOCSLIB.ORG

Wolfmust, Mandatory Checkandreport: Wolves

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Wolfmust, Mandatory Checkandreport: Wolves 2019-2020 & 2020-2021 GRAY WOLF HUNTING & TRAPPING SEASONS & GENERAL RULES General Rules Evidence of Sex: Must be left attached to the hide of any wolf taken. External evidence of sex (scrotum, penis, or testicles for males, or vulva for females) must be left naturally attached to the hide until the mandatory check requirement has been satisfied. Either sex may be taken. Tags: No person may take more wolves than the number for which he or she possesses legal tags. Tags must be validated and securely attached immediately upon killing a wolf. Big Game Feeding Sites: It is unlawful to hunt, trap or pursue wolves within one-half mile of any active Idaho Fish and Game big game feeding site. Weapons Restrictions: Same as for other big game animals, see page 100. Except it is legal to dispatch a trapped gray wolf with a rimfire rifle, rimfire handgun or muzzle-loading handgun. Electronic Calls: Electronic calls may be used to attract wolves for the purpose of harvest. W O L F Telemetry: It is unlawful to take wolves with the aid of radio-telemetry. Dogs: Use of dogs to attract or pursue wolves is prohibited. Retrieving Meat: Hunters and trappers are not required to retrieve meat from a harvested wolf. For tips on skinning a regional officein Nampa, 15950 N Gate Blvd (after June 2019) wolf, contact a regional Fish and Game office, see page 4. 208-465-8465, between 8 a.m. and 5 p.m. or by appointment at Wolves with Radio Collars: Biologists use radio collars the Garden City facility, 109 W. 44th St., 208-327-7095. to monitor wolf activity, assess population status and help Nonresident Deer or Elk tags: A nonresident deer or elk tag, determine future hunting opportunity. Hunters and trappers are excluding Nonresident Junior Mentored/DAV deer and elk required to return any radio collars when they check in their tags, may be used to tag a black bear, mountain lion or gray wolves. wolf, see page 112 for details. Mandatory Check and Report: Any hunters or trapper killing a gray wolf must, within 10 days of date of kill: Wolf Hunting and Trapping Tags • Present the skull and hide to an Idaho Fish and Game Wolf Hunters: The statewide hunter harvest limit is 15 wolves regional office or a Fish and Game conservation officer for per calendar year. removal and retention of a premolar tooth and to have the hide tagged with an official state export tag. No person, Certified Wolf Trappers: The statewide trapper harvest limit who does not possess a fur buyer or taxidermist license is 15 wolves per trapping season. Certified wolf trappers may with appropriate import documentation, shall have, except use either a wolf hunting or trapping tag on any legally taken during the open season and for 10 days after the close of wolf when both hunting and trapping seasons are open in a the season, any raw gray wolf pelt that does not have an unit. official state export tag attached (either Idaho’s or another Please note that gray wolf trapping tags are valid for the entire state’s official export documentation). trapping season, and expire on June 30 of that trapping year. • A hunter or trapper may authorize another person to Gray wolf hunting tags, however, are valid only for a single comply with the mandatory report, provided that person has calendar year and expire on December 31 of that year. enough information to accurately complete the necessary Can a trapper use a wolf hunting tag on a trapped wolf? form. Proxy statement required, see page 102. A person possessing a valid trapping license, with a Wolf • Please thaw your gray wolf hide and skull before Trapper Education course validation, may use a valid wolf bringing it in for tagging. Staff members may not be hunting tag on a trapped wolf, as long as the trapping occurs in able to check a frozen hide or skull. a unit that has open wolf hunting and trapping seasons. Fish and Game’s headquarters office is not equipped to check in wolves. In the Boise area, these animals can be checked Monday through Friday, at the Fish and Game 78 Idaho Big Game 2019 & 2020 Seasons & Rules idfg.idaho.gov Can a trapper use a wolf trapping tag on a wolf not Except it is legal: restrained by a trap? • To trap wolves beyond 30 feet of a naturally killed big A person possessing a valid trapping license, with a Wolf game species as long as the carcass is left undisturbed. Trapper Education course validation, may use a valid wolf • To trap wolves beyond 30 feet of a legally-salvaged road trapping tag to harvest a wolf not restrained by a trap, as long kill. For more information and to complete the required as they also possess a valid hunting license and there is an form to legally-salvage road kill visit our website at open hunting and trapping season in the unit. idfg.idaho.gov/species/roadkill or call a Fish and Game Harvest of trapped wolves and harvest of wolves not restrained office, see page 4. by traps must comply with all wolf trapping and hunting rules, • To trap wolves beyond 30 feet of a wolf carcass with hide methods of take, and harvest reporting requirements. removed. Trapped gray wolves may be dispatched any time of day or Wolf Hunting Rules night. Bait: Hunting big game over bait is illegal, except for black Bait: Bait for trapping is any animal parts; except bleached bears. Wolves may be taken incidentally to bear baiting. It is bones or liquid scent. unlawful to hunt wolves within 200 yards of the perimeter of Incidental Wolf Take: Trappers who do not have wolf any designated dump or sanitary landfill. tags, but accidentally capture a wolf, must release the wolf uninjured and must report the capture to an Idaho Fish Wolf Trapping Rules and Game employee within 5 days of release. If you have difficulty releasing the wolf, please contact Fish and Game A person must attend a wolf trapper education class and have a immediately. W O L F valid trapping license before trapping for wolves. Information on Wolf trapper classes is posted on the Fish and Game at Release of Non-Target Catches: All-nontarget species idfg.idaho.gov/hunt/education. caught alive shall be released immediately. Non-target species are defined as any species caught for which the Trappers must check traps at least every 72 hours. season is closed. Please contact Fish and Game immediately Methods of take: Ground sets are the only legal set allowed if you catch a fisher, wolverine or lynx. for trapping gray wolves. Ground sets are defined as any Removing Trapped Animals of Another: No person shall foothold trap, body-gripping trap or snare originally set in or remove a gray wolf from the trap or snare of another. on the land, including any traps elevated up to a maximum of 36 inches above the natural ground level. Snares must be Tags for Traps: All traps or snares, shall have attached to equipped with diverters and either a break-away device or a the snare or the chain of every trap, a metal tag bearing, in stop within the snare loop, see page 82. The inside jaw spread legible English, the name and current address of the trapper of foot-hold traps must not exceed nine (9) inches. or a six-digit number assigned by Fish and Game. It is unlawful: For additional trapping rules, See the Upland Game, Furbearer & Turkey Seasons and Rules. • To place any ground set on, across, or within ten (10) feet of the edge of any maintained unpaved public trail. • To place any ground set on, across, or within any public Be a highway; EXCEPT ground sets may be placed underneath bridges and within and at culverts that are part of a public Proud Trapper by being a highway right-of-way. Good Representative • To place any ground set incorporating snare, trap, or of trapping. attached materials within three hundred (300) feet of any designated public campground, trailhead, paved trail, or picnic area. Cage or box live traps are permitted within rappers are three hundred (300) feet of designated public campgrounds, Tencouraged to trailheads, paved trails, or picnic areas as allowed by city, use warning signs to county, state, and federal law inform recreational • To use any set within 30 feet of any visible bait. users that traps or • To use a dirt hole set with bait unless the bait remains snares are in the covered at all times to protect raptors and other meat-eating area. Trappers may birds from being caught accidentally. print off copies of the signs from idfg. • To trap wolves within 200 yards of the perimeter of any idaho.gov/trap and designated dump or sanitary landfill. post them near • To use any part of a domestic or wild origin game bird, their trap lines. big game, upland game, game fish or protected nongame Using warning signs wildlife, or to use live animals as bait or an attractant. See is voluntary. the following exceptions. The sign is a courtesy of Idaho Fish and Game in cooperation with the Idaho Trapper’s Association. Idaho Big Game 2019 & 2020 Seasons & Rules idfg.idaho.gov 79 2019 - 2020 & 2020 - 2021 Wolf Hunting Seasons Units Season Dates Notes 1, 2, 3, 4, 4A, 5, 6, 7, 8, 8A, 9, 10, 10A, 11, 11A, July 1 - June 30 Private land only 12, 13, 14, 16, 16A, 17, 19, 20, 21, 21A, 36, 60, 60A, 61, 62A, 63, 63A, 64, 65, Aug 1 - June 30 67, 68, 68A, 71, 73A, 74 Private land only, July 1 - June 30 30, 30A, 37A, 51, 58, 59, Motorized Hunting Rule Applies, See Pages 104 - 106 59A, 66, 66A, 69, 70, 72, 73, 75, 77, 76, 78 Aug 1 - June 30 Motorized Hunting Rule Applies, See Pages 104 - 106 15, 18, 22, 23, 24, 28, 31, 33, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, July 1 - June 30 44, 46, 54, 55, 57, 62 W O L F 29, 32, 32A, 36A, 36B, 37, July 1 - June 30 Motorized Hunting Rule Applies,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Alaska's Predator Control Programs
    Alaska’sAlaska’s PredatorPredator ControlControl ProgramsPrograms Managing for Abundance or Abundant Mismanagement? In 1995, Alaska Governor Tony Knowles responded to negative publicity over his state’s predator control programs by requesting a National Academy of Sciences review of Alaska’s entire approach to predator control. Following the review Governor Knowles announced that no program should be considered unless it met three criteria: cost-effectiveness, scientific scrutiny and broad public acceptability. The National Academy of Sciences’ National Research Council (NRC) released its review, Wolves, Bears, and Their Prey in Alaska, in 1997, drawing conclusions and making recommendations for management of Alaska’s predators and prey. In 1996, prior to the release of the NRC report, the Wolf Management Reform Coalition, a group dedicated to promoting fair-chase hunting and responsible management of wolves in Alaska, published Showdown in Alaska to document the rise of wolf control in Alaska and the efforts undertaken to stop it. This report, Alaska’s Predator Control Programs: Managing for Abundance or Abundant Mismanagement? picks up where that 1996 report left off. Acknowledgements Authors: Caroline Kennedy, Theresa Fiorino Editor: Kate Davies Designer: Pete Corcoran DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE Defenders of Wildlife is a national, nonprofit membership organization dedicated to the protection of all native wild animals and plants in their natural communities. www.defenders.org Cover photo: © Nick Jans © 2011 Defenders of Wildlife 1130 17th Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20036-4604 202.682.9400 333 West 4th Avenue, Suite 302 Anchorage, AK 99501 907.276.9453 Table of Contents 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................... 2 2. The National Research Council Review ......................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Should We Hunt Gray Wolves in Michigan?
    SHOULD WE HUNT GRAY WOLVES IN MICHIGAN? AUGUST 2018 Dean’s Welcome Welcome, SEAS students! Before you know it, you will be boarding a bus with your classmates, headed for the University of Michigan Biological Station (the “Biostation”) in beautiful Northern Michigan—or “Up North” as Michiganders call it. There, during an immersive orientation experience, you will explore, learn, bond—and become an integral part of our community. This is just the beginning of your graduate career at SEAS, throughout which we will work together to solve some of the world’s most complex environmental problems. This is why you chose SEAS, and why we chose you. It is all very exciting, and we cannot wait to get started. So, why wait? The following case study details an active issue in the state of Michigan: whether or not to allow a public wolf hunt. During your time at the Biostation, you will be asked to examine the issue from opposing, nuanced perspectives, challenging your own gut reaction to the problem. Discussions will be guided by the scientific, political, economic, and social analyses included in these pages. You will actively collaborate with your classmates to uncover and synthesize facts, ultimately building a responsible, sustainable policy recommendation on Michigan’s wolf population. To prepare, simply read the case study and let it simmer. There is no need to do additional research. Enjoy your time at orientation. Get to know your classmates. Explore the gorgeous landscape. And then, come September 4th, join us back at the Dana Building ready to launch your graduate education and set out on a path of meaningful work—work that will have an impact on generations to come.
    [Show full text]
  • Impact of Wolf Hunting Policy on Moose Populations in Northern Minnesota Thomas J Mackey† and Thomas Bryce Kelly*
    Impact of wolf hunting policy on moose populations in northern Minnesota Thomas J Mackey† and Thomas Bryce Kelly* *Boston College, Chestnut Hill, MA. Email: [email protected] 5 † Boston College, Chestnut Hill, MA. Email: [email protected] s t n i r P e 10 r P 15 Abstract An ongoing and politically sensitive aspect of proper ecological stewardship revolves around improving the conditions and health of all of the species in the area of 20 concern including both predator and prey species. Human industrial activities have dramatically reduced the land area available to the native species which has placed stresses and fragility into the ecological web. Maintaining proper ecological dynamics has become a critical aspect of policy initiatives designed to safeguard our natural reserves including the establishment of ecological forests and sanctuaries. Herein we 25 outline our proposal to tackle a central issue in wildlife management: improving our knowledge of predator-prey dynamics that vary both temporally and specially in non- linear ways. By leveraging techniques pioneered in other disciplines in addition to the traditional methods, we aim to drastically improve our understanding of the Moose-Grey Wolf interaction and to develop a system with applicability in other regions and other 30 species. PeerJ PrePrints | http://dx.doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.769v2 | CC-BY 4.0 Open Access | rec: 31 Dec 2014, publ: 31 Dec 2014 2 | Mackey and Kelly Introduction Northern Minnesota exists at the southern boundary of Moose (Alces alces) distributions in central North America. The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources 5 (Minnesota DNR) conducts annual aerial plot surveys to estimate Moose populations.
    [Show full text]
  • February 2021 Wolf Hunting and Trapping Regulations
    FEBRUARY 2021 WOLF HUNTING AND TRAPPING REGULATIONS The Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources Provides equal opportunity in its employment, programs, services and functions under an Affirmative Action Plan. If you have any questions, please write to: Chief, Public Civil Rights, Office of Civil Rights, U.S. Department of the Interior, 1849 C. Street, NW, Washington, D.C. 20240. This publication is available in alternative format (large print, Braille, etc.) upon request. Please call Accessibility Coordinator at 608-267-7490 for more information. REMEMBER • You must notify the DNR within 24 hours of harvest by visiting GameReg. wi.gov or by calling 844-GAMEREG (844-426-3734 • You must also exhibit your wolf to an authorized DNR representative (usually a Conservation Warden) for registration and tagging no later than March 7, 2021. -Before registering a wolf with an authorized DNR representative, you must skin the animal and separate the pelt from the carcass. Be sure it is thawed out on the day of registration so that the registration tag can be attached. This does not need to be completed before registration for specimens going to a taxidermist. Persons who intend to have the wolf mounted by a taxidermist may exhibit the wolf to the department for registration without separating the pelt. The skinned carcass must be exhibited to the department within 30 days of registration. (Note: These animals must still be registered prior to taxidermy). -Contact the local Conservation Warden or wildlife biologist or call 888- 936-7463 to determine available times for registration. • This pamphlet gives a summary of Wisconsin’s wolf hunting and trapping laws and how they affect you; it is not a complete set of all the hunting- related laws.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation Plan for Gray Wolves in California PART I December 2016
    California Department of Fish and Wildlife Conservation Plan for Gray Wolves in California Part I December 2016 Charlton H. Bonham, Director Cover photograph by Gary Kramer This document should be cited as: Kovacs, K. E., K.E. Converse, M.C. Stopher, J.H. Hobbs, M.L. Sommer, P.J. Figura, D.A. Applebee, D.L. Clifford, and D.J. Michaels. Conservation Plan for Gray Wolves in California. 2016. California Department of Fish and Wildlife, Sacramento, CA 329 pp. The preparers want to acknowledge Department of Fish and Wildlife staff who contributed to the preparation of this document. They include Steve Torres, Angela Donlan, and Kirsten Macintyre. Further, we appreciate the agencies and staff from the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, Washington Department of Wildlife, and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service for their generous support in our efforts to prepare this document. We are also indebted to our facilitation experts at Kearns and West, specifically Sam Magill. Table of Contents – PART I INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................. 2 Plan Development ....................................................................................................................................... 2 Plan Goals ..................................................................................................................................................... 4 Summary of Historical Distribution and Abundance of Wolves in California .....................................
    [Show full text]
  • Comparative Patterns of Predation by Cougars and Recolonizing Wolves in Montana’S Madison Range
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln USDA National Wildlife Research Center - Staff U.S. Department of Agriculture: Animal and Publications Plant Health Inspection Service May 2007 Comparative Patterns of Predation by Cougars and Recolonizing Wolves in Montana’s Madison Range Todd C. Atwood Utah State University, Logan, UT Eric M. Gese USDA/APHIS/WS National Wildlife Research Center, [email protected] Kyran E. Kunkel Utah State University, Logan, UT Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/icwdm_usdanwrc Part of the Environmental Sciences Commons Atwood, Todd C.; Gese, Eric M.; and Kunkel, Kyran E., "Comparative Patterns of Predation by Cougars and Recolonizing Wolves in Montana’s Madison Range" (2007). USDA National Wildlife Research Center - Staff Publications. 696. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/icwdm_usdanwrc/696 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the U.S. Department of Agriculture: Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in USDA National Wildlife Research Center - Staff Publications by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Research Article Comparative Patterns of Predation by Cougars and Recolonizing Wolves in Montana’s Madison Range TODD C. ATWOOD,1,2 Department of Wildland Resources, Utah State University, Logan, UT 84322, USA ERIC M. GESE, United States Department of Agriculture–Animal Plant Health Inspection Service–Wildlife Services, National Wildlife Research Center, Department of Wildland Resources, Utah State University, Logan, UT 84322, USA KYRAN E. KUNKEL, Department of Wildland Resources, Utah State University, Logan, UT 84322, USA ABSTRACT Numerous studies have documented how prey may use antipredator strategies to reduce the risk of predation from a single predator.
    [Show full text]
  • Gray Wolves Are Undoubtedly Reclaiming Their Previous Territory at a Rapid Pace
    Species: Gray Wolf (Canis lupus) Diet: Carnivore Size: 26-32 inches tall; 4.5-6.5 feet long and one of the largest mammalian carnivores found in the Pacific West, next to the Grizzly Bear, Black Bear and Mountain Lion (Cougar) Weight: 55-130 lbs. Delta Pack gray wolf, Yellowstone National Park. Lifespan in the wild: 7-8 years Credit: USNPS. Diet: Primary prey consists of ungulates, or hoofed mammals, such as deer or elk. Though wolves generally rely on large prey species, they are opportunists and have also been known to consume smaller mammals, such as beavers or rabbits, as well as scavenge upon already-dead animals. During periods of abundant food, wolves can eat up to 30 pounds of meat per day. Fluctuating environmental conditions require wolves to adapt to sudden abundances of prey often followed by days of prey scarcity. Roosevelt bull elk. Behavior: Wolves are social animals that usually Credit: ODFW. live in packs. Packs are typically family groups that consist of a breeding male and female (also called the breeding pair) and their offspring. Sometimes called “alphas,” the breeding pair are usually responsible for tracking and hunting prey, establishing territories, finding den sites, and reproducing. Subordinate wolves often assist in rearing young pups, hunting, and other responsibilities. Sometimes wolves depart from their pack to establish new territories and form new packs. This is called dispersal. One of the most exciting aspects of wolf © Pacific Wolf Coalition, Summer 2017 1 research is our constantly-evolving understanding of their complex social dynamics. Communication is an important component of wolves’ social structures.
    [Show full text]
  • Is Niche Separation Between Wolves and Cougars Realized in the Rocky Mountains?
    Is niche separation between wolves and cougars realized in the Rocky Mountains? by Kerri Elizabeth Krawchuk A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Ecology Department of Biological Sciences University of Alberta © Kerri Elizabeth Krawchuk, 2014 ABSTRACT Multiple carnivore species can have greater population limiting effects than single carnivores. Two coexisting carnivores can only be similar up to a certain extent. I investigate how two carnivores, wolves (Canis lupus) and cougars (Puma concolor), coexist through niche partitioning in the central east slopes of the Alberta Rocky Mountains. Wolf packs spatio- temporally avoided other wolf packs more than they did cougars, while cougars avoided conspecifics as much as wolves. Reinforcing spatial separation, temporally wolves had two crepuscular movement peaks while cougars had just one. Male cougar movements peaked in the late evening and was high over night, while female cougar movement increased throughout the day and peaked in the evening. Female cougars selected different habitat features from male cougars and from wolves during both the day and night, while male cougars had more habitat selection differences from wolves at night. I found some evidence that cougars were more influenced by landscape features than wolves. Differences in the predators’ habitat selection were primarily for prey density contingent upon habitat features, likely related to maximizing hunting efficiency. Both species killed primarily deer (Odocoileus virginianus, O. hemionus), though wolves and male cougars killed and selected more large-bodied ungulate prey, such as elk (Cervus elaphus), moose (Alces alces) and/or feral horses (Equus calabus) than female cougars, who strongly selected for deer.
    [Show full text]
  • Predators in the 'Hood
    NEWSFOCUS on October 3, 2013 www.sciencemag.org At home. An American black bear roamed downtown Predators in the ‘Hood Aspen, Colorado, on a summer night. especially in cities of the western United States, seem willing to have them back, says As cougars, coyotes, and bears spread into backyards and downtowns, Stanley Gehrt, a wildlife biologist at Ohio science is helping to show how people and predators can coexist State University, Columbus, who tracks Downloaded from Chicago’s coyotes. That leaves scientists, TWO YEARS AGO, IN JUNE 2011, A COUGAR Once hunted nearly to extinction in conservationists, and wildlife managers wandered through backyards and peered the lower 48, America’s biggest preda- all scrambling to figure out how to best into homes in Milford, Connecticut, the tors are making a remarkable comeback. manage animals that literally live next door fi rst mountain lion in that state in more than Their return has sparked a range of emo- and are capable of killing humans. “If you’re 100 years. Later that same year, a gray wolf tions, from surprise and joy to demands that interested in large carnivores, it’s a very crossed the Oregon border into California, the the animals be harshly controlled, if not exciting time,” Gehrt says. “There are more fi rst wolf in that state in more than 80 years. shot outright. Europe is expe- people than ever and yet we’re Black bears now lumber through subdivisions riencing a similar resurgence, seeing a resurgence and accep- in Ohio and Missouri, states that were bearless and similar reactions (Science, Online tance of these predators.
    [Show full text]
  • FWP HUNTING and TRAPPING REGULATIONS Fwp.Mt.Gov
    2020 WOLF FWP HUNTING AND TRAPPING REGULATIONS Gray Wolf Canis lupus TURN IN POACHERS: CALL 1-800-TIP-MONT fwp.mt.gov Highlights & Reminders Obtain a License • Once you have established your residency, you must continue to meet all these • Two swivels, including a center swivel on The combined maximum hunting and trapping requirements and physically reside in the base of the trap, will be required for all bag limit is five wolves per person during the Montana as your principal or primary ground set foothold traps. For details, visit: 2020-2021 season. Five wolves can be taken place of abode for not less than 120 days fwp.mt.gov/hunting/trapping. by means of hunting each with a valid Wolf per year (days need not be consecutive). • Beginning Oct. 1, 2020, a hunter or trapper License. Trapping is authorized Dec. 15, 2020 • To purchase an annual resident who has completed a transfer form may - Feb. 28, 2021, with a valid Trapping License have a representative present the hide Conservation License, you will be required and upon completion of mandatory wolf- to show a valid Montana Driver’s License and skull to a Montana FWP official for trapping certification. Persons could take up inspection. See mandatory reporting (MDL), a valid Montana Identification Card to five wolves via any combination of hunting (MIC), or a valid Tribal Identification Card. requirements section for details. and trapping (maximum harvest of five wolves • Collared wolves can be lawfully taken, but • If your MDL or MIC has been issued for per person). For hunting, a separate license less than six months, you may be required they provide important information for is required for each wolf.
    [Show full text]
  • Utah Wolf Management Plan
    UTAH WOLF MANAGEMENT PLAN Utah Division of Wildlife Resources Publication #: 05-17 Prepared by: The Utah Division of Wildlife Resources & The Utah Wolf Working Group UTAH WOLF MANAGEMENT PLAN Table of Contents List of Tables ........................................................................................... i List of Figures ......................................................................................... ii Executive Summary ................................................................................ iii Dedication ............................................................................................... iv Introduction ............................................................................................ 1 Part I. Gray Wolf Ecology and Natural History .................................... 4 Description ............................................................................................... 4 Distribution ............................................................................................... 4 Sign .......................................................................................................... 5 Taxonomy ................................................................................................ 5 Reproduction ............................................................................................ 6 Mortality .................................................................................................... 6 Social Ecology .........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Public Perception of Large Carnivores in Latvia
    Public perception of large carnivores in Latvia Zˇanete Andersone1,3 and Janis Ozolinxsˇ2 1Kxemeri National Park, Jurmala, Latvia 2State Forest Service, Riga, Latvia Abstract: Knowledge of and atittudes toward brown bear (Ursus arctos), lynx (Lynx lynx), and wolf (Canis lupus) in Latvia were assessed through surveys. Brown bears are rare and protected, whereas lynx and wolf are game species. Questionnaires were distributed in public schools and to a self- selected sample of readers of a national hunter’s magazine. The Latvian public generally supported large carnivore conservation. Among the 3 species considered, the most positive attitudes were toward brown bears. Negative attitudes were a result of real or perceived effects large carnivores have on livestock husbandry and game management. Nearly 70% of respondents thought protection of bears should be continued, whereas 24% of respondents supported control of bear populations. A majority of respondents believed that wolf and lynx populations should be controlled, but very few respondents supported total eradication of large carnivores in Latvia. A greater proportion of rural inhabitants favored control of carnivore populations than residents in other locales. In contrast, hunters (n ¼ 157, almost entirely male, mostly rural, and somewhat older) favored unlimited harvesting of large carnivores. Most respondents expressed interest in obtaining more information on large carnivores, suggesting a role for an expanded education campaign. Key words: brown bear, Canis lupus, Eurasian lynx, human attitudes, Latvia, Lynx lynx, Ursus arctos, wolf Ursus 15(2):181–187 (2004) Public opinion is an important consideration in European countries, wolves, lynx, and brown bears are conservation of large carnivores (Kellert 1985; Bahu- protected and hunting of these species is prohibited.
    [Show full text]