DOCSLIB.ORG

FWP HUNTING and TRAPPING REGULATIONS Fwp.Mt.Gov

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
FWP HUNTING and TRAPPING REGULATIONS Fwp.Mt.Gov 2020 WOLF FWP HUNTING AND TRAPPING REGULATIONS Gray Wolf Canis lupus TURN IN POACHERS: CALL 1-800-TIP-MONT fwp.mt.gov Highlights & Reminders Obtain a License • Once you have established your residency, you must continue to meet all these • Two swivels, including a center swivel on The combined maximum hunting and trapping requirements and physically reside in the base of the trap, will be required for all bag limit is five wolves per person during the Montana as your principal or primary ground set foothold traps. For details, visit: 2020-2021 season. Five wolves can be taken place of abode for not less than 120 days fwp.mt.gov/hunting/trapping. by means of hunting each with a valid Wolf per year (days need not be consecutive). • Beginning Oct. 1, 2020, a hunter or trapper License. Trapping is authorized Dec. 15, 2020 • To purchase an annual resident who has completed a transfer form may - Feb. 28, 2021, with a valid Trapping License have a representative present the hide Conservation License, you will be required and upon completion of mandatory wolf- to show a valid Montana Driver’s License and skull to a Montana FWP official for trapping certification. Persons could take up inspection. See mandatory reporting (MDL), a valid Montana Identification Card to five wolves via any combination of hunting (MIC), or a valid Tribal Identification Card. requirements section for details. and trapping (maximum harvest of five wolves • Collared wolves can be lawfully taken, but • If your MDL or MIC has been issued for per person). For hunting, a separate license less than six months, you may be required they provide important information for is required for each wolf. For trapping, only a monitoring populations and managing to show additional proof of residency. An Trapping License is required. out-of-state driver’s license is NOT an livestock depredations. • A Wolf License is available at all Fish, • A wolf harvest must be reported within acceptable form of ID for resident license Wildlife & Parks offices, FWP license purchases. Contact your local FWP office 24 hours. providers, and online at fwp.mt.gov. • Any Wolf Management Unit (WMU) can for specifics. close upon a 24-hour notice. • A Wolf License must be purchased by • A person is NOT considered a resident for the February 28, 2021. Hunting purposes of this section if the person claims • Electronic calls can be used for wolf hunting. • A Wolf License purchased after August 31 residence in any other state or country for Trapping may not be used until 24 hours after the any purpose. license is issued. • WMU 313 is closed to wolf trapping in the • The Conservation License allows hunters, Hunter/Trapper Education Deckard Flats to Trail Creek Wolf Trapping Requirements Closure Area. anglers, and trappers access to all legally • Wolf trap pan tension must be at least 10 accessible state school trust lands. Contact Hunter Education for Firearm and Archery pounds in Regions 1,2,3,4, and 5. a DNRC office for regulations. • If you were born after January 1, 1985, you • Trappers must immediately dispatch a Licensing – Youth Hunting are required to show proof of completing trapped wolf by gunshot – unless otherwise Opportunities a Montana Hunter Safety and Education authorized not to do so by FWP prior to Course (or an approved Hunter Safety wolf-trapping efforts. A resident or nonresident youth 12 years of age Course from any other state or province) or older may hunt any game species for which prior to applying for or purchasing a Regulations Adopted by Fish their license is valid. Those who will reach 12 hunting license, whether the hunting & Wildlife Commission years of age by January 16, 2021, may hunt any license is for the rifle or archery season. game species, for which their license is valid, • Bowhunter requirements - in order to Regulations for season dates, structures, after August 15 of the 2020 license year. Proof and restrictions were adopted by the F&W purchase a Montana Bow and Arrow of hunter education must be presented at the license, a hunter must provide a certificate Commission on February 13, 2020, under the time of purchase. authority granted in MCA 87-1-301 and are of completion of a National Bowhunter • Apprentice Hunters - are not eligible to hunt Education Course or provide any prior valid March 1, 2020, through March 15, 2021. wolves. Visit fwp.mt.gov for details. The F&W Commission reserves the authority year’s archery license from any state or • In order to carry or use a firearm for any province. to amend the seasons, limits and regulations reason, a youth under 14 years of age must herein if deemed necessary for wildlife be accompanied by a person having charge • Montana law requires members of the management purposes. Statutes and other or custody of the youth, or be under the armed forces and their dependents information, including other agencies’ supervision of a qualified firearms safety stationed in Montana to present a Montana restrictions, are provided as a courtesy and instructor or an adult 18 years of age or older hunter education certificate or similar do not fall under Commission authority. Martha who has been authorized by the youth’s certificate from any state or province when Williams, Director. parent or guardian, MCA 45-8-344. purchasing any Montana hunting license. Discrimination Prohibited – State and Federal • Duplicates – Montana certificates of laws, Title VI of Civil Rights Act of 1964, Residency completion for the Montana hunter Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, education and/or bowhunter education Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act It is unlawful to swear to or to affirm a false statement in order to obtain an original or courses may be obtained from FWP’s of 1990, the Age Discrimination Act of 1975, website. and Title IX of the Education Amendments of duplicate resident hunting and/or fishing license OR to assist an unqualified applicant Wolf Trapper Certification – A person must 1972, prohibit discrimination on the basis of attend and complete a wolf-trapping race, color, sex, age, religion, national origin, or in obtaining a resident license. Resident certification class before setting any trap disability. Anyone believing he or she has been for a wolf. Completion of either the Idaho discriminated against (as described above) • To be a legal Montana resident and eligible or Montana wolf-trapping certification in any FWP program, activity, or facility may to purchase any Montana resident fishing, class will be recognized as meeting this write to FWP Human Resources, 1420 East hunting, and trapping licenses, as per MCA requirement. A certificate will be awarded Sixth Avenue, PO Box 200701, Helena, MT 87-2-102, you must: to those completing the Montana trapping 59620-0701 or the office of Equal Opportunity, - Claim Montana as your principal or certification class. This certification must U.S. Department of the Interior, Washington, primary home or place of abode be in possession of any person setting wolf D.C. 20240 - Have been physically living in Montana for traps and/or harvesting a wolf by trap. at least 180 consecutive days immediately Definitions prior to purchasing a resident license Hunter with a Disability Legal Wolf – Any male or female wolf, - Register your vehicle(s) in Montana If you or someone you know has a disability and/ including young-of-the-year. - Be registered to vote in Montana if you’re or is aging, and is in need of assistive technology Wolf Management Unit (WMU) – Areas registered to vote (AT) or adaptive equipment to help you participate in outdoor recreation, please contact: that define Montana’s wolf-hunting and - Not possess current (or have applied for MonTech at the University trapping districts as specified under any) resident hunting, fishing, or trapping of Montana Rural Institute “Wolf Management Unit (WMU) Legal privileges in another state or country 29 McGill Hall Descriptions.” - File Montana state income tax returns Missoula, MT 59803 as a resident, if you are required to file (406) 243-5751 montech.ruralinstitute.umt.edu/ 2 Turn In Poachers. Enough is Enough! Make the call: 1-800-847-6668 License Chart similar devices. These limitations shall not exclude the mechanical leverage advantage The following licenses, for the purpose of wolf hunting, are valid March 1, 2020, through the provided by eccentric wheels or cams, so dates listed in these regulations and are subject to quota closures. long as the available energy stored in the LICENSE REQUIREMENTS COST bent limbs of the bow is the sole result of a Annual fee charged at the time the hunter purchases their $10 Resident single, continuous, and direct pulling effort Base Hunting License by the shooter. first hunting license. $15 Nonresident $4 Resident - The bow must be hand-held. One hand shall 12-17, 62+ hold the bow and the other hand draw the Required prerequisite at the time the hunter purchases bowstring. The bowstring must be moved Conservation License $8 Resident their first hunting or fishing license. and/or held at all points in the draw cycle $10 Nonresident entirely by muscle power of the shooter until Wolf License release. The bowstring must be released as Must be purchased by Feb. 28, 2021. A wolf-hunting $12 Resident without a a direct and conscious action of the shooter, license purchased after August 31 may not be used until Sportsmans or either relaxing the tension of the fingers or 24 hours after the license is issued. Maximum of 5 per $50 triggering the release action of a hand-held Combination person. Nonresident License release aid. Exception: Physically disabled bowhunters Wolf License with Only valid for the first wolf license purchased after $10 Resident certified by FWP with the Permit To Modify a Sportsmans purchasing a sportsman or combination license.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Alaska's Predator Control Programs
    Alaska’sAlaska’s PredatorPredator ControlControl ProgramsPrograms Managing for Abundance or Abundant Mismanagement? In 1995, Alaska Governor Tony Knowles responded to negative publicity over his state’s predator control programs by requesting a National Academy of Sciences review of Alaska’s entire approach to predator control. Following the review Governor Knowles announced that no program should be considered unless it met three criteria: cost-effectiveness, scientific scrutiny and broad public acceptability. The National Academy of Sciences’ National Research Council (NRC) released its review, Wolves, Bears, and Their Prey in Alaska, in 1997, drawing conclusions and making recommendations for management of Alaska’s predators and prey. In 1996, prior to the release of the NRC report, the Wolf Management Reform Coalition, a group dedicated to promoting fair-chase hunting and responsible management of wolves in Alaska, published Showdown in Alaska to document the rise of wolf control in Alaska and the efforts undertaken to stop it. This report, Alaska’s Predator Control Programs: Managing for Abundance or Abundant Mismanagement? picks up where that 1996 report left off. Acknowledgements Authors: Caroline Kennedy, Theresa Fiorino Editor: Kate Davies Designer: Pete Corcoran DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE Defenders of Wildlife is a national, nonprofit membership organization dedicated to the protection of all native wild animals and plants in their natural communities. www.defenders.org Cover photo: © Nick Jans © 2011 Defenders of Wildlife 1130 17th Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20036-4604 202.682.9400 333 West 4th Avenue, Suite 302 Anchorage, AK 99501 907.276.9453 Table of Contents 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................... 2 2. The National Research Council Review ......................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Should We Hunt Gray Wolves in Michigan?
    SHOULD WE HUNT GRAY WOLVES IN MICHIGAN? AUGUST 2018 Dean’s Welcome Welcome, SEAS students! Before you know it, you will be boarding a bus with your classmates, headed for the University of Michigan Biological Station (the “Biostation”) in beautiful Northern Michigan—or “Up North” as Michiganders call it. There, during an immersive orientation experience, you will explore, learn, bond—and become an integral part of our community. This is just the beginning of your graduate career at SEAS, throughout which we will work together to solve some of the world’s most complex environmental problems. This is why you chose SEAS, and why we chose you. It is all very exciting, and we cannot wait to get started. So, why wait? The following case study details an active issue in the state of Michigan: whether or not to allow a public wolf hunt. During your time at the Biostation, you will be asked to examine the issue from opposing, nuanced perspectives, challenging your own gut reaction to the problem. Discussions will be guided by the scientific, political, economic, and social analyses included in these pages. You will actively collaborate with your classmates to uncover and synthesize facts, ultimately building a responsible, sustainable policy recommendation on Michigan’s wolf population. To prepare, simply read the case study and let it simmer. There is no need to do additional research. Enjoy your time at orientation. Get to know your classmates. Explore the gorgeous landscape. And then, come September 4th, join us back at the Dana Building ready to launch your graduate education and set out on a path of meaningful work—work that will have an impact on generations to come.
    [Show full text]
  • Impact of Wolf Hunting Policy on Moose Populations in Northern Minnesota Thomas J Mackey† and Thomas Bryce Kelly*
    Impact of wolf hunting policy on moose populations in northern Minnesota Thomas J Mackey† and Thomas Bryce Kelly* *Boston College, Chestnut Hill, MA. Email: [email protected] 5 † Boston College, Chestnut Hill, MA. Email: [email protected] s t n i r P e 10 r P 15 Abstract An ongoing and politically sensitive aspect of proper ecological stewardship revolves around improving the conditions and health of all of the species in the area of 20 concern including both predator and prey species. Human industrial activities have dramatically reduced the land area available to the native species which has placed stresses and fragility into the ecological web. Maintaining proper ecological dynamics has become a critical aspect of policy initiatives designed to safeguard our natural reserves including the establishment of ecological forests and sanctuaries. Herein we 25 outline our proposal to tackle a central issue in wildlife management: improving our knowledge of predator-prey dynamics that vary both temporally and specially in non- linear ways. By leveraging techniques pioneered in other disciplines in addition to the traditional methods, we aim to drastically improve our understanding of the Moose-Grey Wolf interaction and to develop a system with applicability in other regions and other 30 species. PeerJ PrePrints | http://dx.doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.769v2 | CC-BY 4.0 Open Access | rec: 31 Dec 2014, publ: 31 Dec 2014 2 | Mackey and Kelly Introduction Northern Minnesota exists at the southern boundary of Moose (Alces alces) distributions in central North America. The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources 5 (Minnesota DNR) conducts annual aerial plot surveys to estimate Moose populations.
    [Show full text]
  • February 2021 Wolf Hunting and Trapping Regulations
    FEBRUARY 2021 WOLF HUNTING AND TRAPPING REGULATIONS The Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources Provides equal opportunity in its employment, programs, services and functions under an Affirmative Action Plan. If you have any questions, please write to: Chief, Public Civil Rights, Office of Civil Rights, U.S. Department of the Interior, 1849 C. Street, NW, Washington, D.C. 20240. This publication is available in alternative format (large print, Braille, etc.) upon request. Please call Accessibility Coordinator at 608-267-7490 for more information. REMEMBER • You must notify the DNR within 24 hours of harvest by visiting GameReg. wi.gov or by calling 844-GAMEREG (844-426-3734 • You must also exhibit your wolf to an authorized DNR representative (usually a Conservation Warden) for registration and tagging no later than March 7, 2021. -Before registering a wolf with an authorized DNR representative, you must skin the animal and separate the pelt from the carcass. Be sure it is thawed out on the day of registration so that the registration tag can be attached. This does not need to be completed before registration for specimens going to a taxidermist. Persons who intend to have the wolf mounted by a taxidermist may exhibit the wolf to the department for registration without separating the pelt. The skinned carcass must be exhibited to the department within 30 days of registration. (Note: These animals must still be registered prior to taxidermy). -Contact the local Conservation Warden or wildlife biologist or call 888- 936-7463 to determine available times for registration. • This pamphlet gives a summary of Wisconsin’s wolf hunting and trapping laws and how they affect you; it is not a complete set of all the hunting- related laws.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation Plan for Gray Wolves in California PART I December 2016
    California Department of Fish and Wildlife Conservation Plan for Gray Wolves in California Part I December 2016 Charlton H. Bonham, Director Cover photograph by Gary Kramer This document should be cited as: Kovacs, K. E., K.E. Converse, M.C. Stopher, J.H. Hobbs, M.L. Sommer, P.J. Figura, D.A. Applebee, D.L. Clifford, and D.J. Michaels. Conservation Plan for Gray Wolves in California. 2016. California Department of Fish and Wildlife, Sacramento, CA 329 pp. The preparers want to acknowledge Department of Fish and Wildlife staff who contributed to the preparation of this document. They include Steve Torres, Angela Donlan, and Kirsten Macintyre. Further, we appreciate the agencies and staff from the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, Washington Department of Wildlife, and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service for their generous support in our efforts to prepare this document. We are also indebted to our facilitation experts at Kearns and West, specifically Sam Magill. Table of Contents – PART I INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................. 2 Plan Development ....................................................................................................................................... 2 Plan Goals ..................................................................................................................................................... 4 Summary of Historical Distribution and Abundance of Wolves in California .....................................
    [Show full text]
  • Comparative Patterns of Predation by Cougars and Recolonizing Wolves in Montana’S Madison Range
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln USDA National Wildlife Research Center - Staff U.S. Department of Agriculture: Animal and Publications Plant Health Inspection Service May 2007 Comparative Patterns of Predation by Cougars and Recolonizing Wolves in Montana’s Madison Range Todd C. Atwood Utah State University, Logan, UT Eric M. Gese USDA/APHIS/WS National Wildlife Research Center, [email protected] Kyran E. Kunkel Utah State University, Logan, UT Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/icwdm_usdanwrc Part of the Environmental Sciences Commons Atwood, Todd C.; Gese, Eric M.; and Kunkel, Kyran E., "Comparative Patterns of Predation by Cougars and Recolonizing Wolves in Montana’s Madison Range" (2007). USDA National Wildlife Research Center - Staff Publications. 696. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/icwdm_usdanwrc/696 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the U.S. Department of Agriculture: Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in USDA National Wildlife Research Center - Staff Publications by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Research Article Comparative Patterns of Predation by Cougars and Recolonizing Wolves in Montana’s Madison Range TODD C. ATWOOD,1,2 Department of Wildland Resources, Utah State University, Logan, UT 84322, USA ERIC M. GESE, United States Department of Agriculture–Animal Plant Health Inspection Service–Wildlife Services, National Wildlife Research Center, Department of Wildland Resources, Utah State University, Logan, UT 84322, USA KYRAN E. KUNKEL, Department of Wildland Resources, Utah State University, Logan, UT 84322, USA ABSTRACT Numerous studies have documented how prey may use antipredator strategies to reduce the risk of predation from a single predator.
    [Show full text]
  • Gray Wolves Are Undoubtedly Reclaiming Their Previous Territory at a Rapid Pace
    Species: Gray Wolf (Canis lupus) Diet: Carnivore Size: 26-32 inches tall; 4.5-6.5 feet long and one of the largest mammalian carnivores found in the Pacific West, next to the Grizzly Bear, Black Bear and Mountain Lion (Cougar) Weight: 55-130 lbs. Delta Pack gray wolf, Yellowstone National Park. Lifespan in the wild: 7-8 years Credit: USNPS. Diet: Primary prey consists of ungulates, or hoofed mammals, such as deer or elk. Though wolves generally rely on large prey species, they are opportunists and have also been known to consume smaller mammals, such as beavers or rabbits, as well as scavenge upon already-dead animals. During periods of abundant food, wolves can eat up to 30 pounds of meat per day. Fluctuating environmental conditions require wolves to adapt to sudden abundances of prey often followed by days of prey scarcity. Roosevelt bull elk. Behavior: Wolves are social animals that usually Credit: ODFW. live in packs. Packs are typically family groups that consist of a breeding male and female (also called the breeding pair) and their offspring. Sometimes called “alphas,” the breeding pair are usually responsible for tracking and hunting prey, establishing territories, finding den sites, and reproducing. Subordinate wolves often assist in rearing young pups, hunting, and other responsibilities. Sometimes wolves depart from their pack to establish new territories and form new packs. This is called dispersal. One of the most exciting aspects of wolf © Pacific Wolf Coalition, Summer 2017 1 research is our constantly-evolving understanding of their complex social dynamics. Communication is an important component of wolves’ social structures.
    [Show full text]
  • Is Niche Separation Between Wolves and Cougars Realized in the Rocky Mountains?
    Is niche separation between wolves and cougars realized in the Rocky Mountains? by Kerri Elizabeth Krawchuk A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Ecology Department of Biological Sciences University of Alberta © Kerri Elizabeth Krawchuk, 2014 ABSTRACT Multiple carnivore species can have greater population limiting effects than single carnivores. Two coexisting carnivores can only be similar up to a certain extent. I investigate how two carnivores, wolves (Canis lupus) and cougars (Puma concolor), coexist through niche partitioning in the central east slopes of the Alberta Rocky Mountains. Wolf packs spatio- temporally avoided other wolf packs more than they did cougars, while cougars avoided conspecifics as much as wolves. Reinforcing spatial separation, temporally wolves had two crepuscular movement peaks while cougars had just one. Male cougar movements peaked in the late evening and was high over night, while female cougar movement increased throughout the day and peaked in the evening. Female cougars selected different habitat features from male cougars and from wolves during both the day and night, while male cougars had more habitat selection differences from wolves at night. I found some evidence that cougars were more influenced by landscape features than wolves. Differences in the predators’ habitat selection were primarily for prey density contingent upon habitat features, likely related to maximizing hunting efficiency. Both species killed primarily deer (Odocoileus virginianus, O. hemionus), though wolves and male cougars killed and selected more large-bodied ungulate prey, such as elk (Cervus elaphus), moose (Alces alces) and/or feral horses (Equus calabus) than female cougars, who strongly selected for deer.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Adaptive Plasticity in a Major Evolutionary Transition
    Functional Blackwell Publishing Ltd Ecology 2007 The role of adaptive plasticity in a major evolutionary 21, 1154–1161 transition: early aquatic experience affects locomotor performance of terrestrial snakes F. AUBRET,*† X. BONNET‡ and R. SHINE* *University of Sydney, Biological Sciences A08, 2006 New South Wales, Australia, ‡Centre d’Etudes Biologiques de Chizé, CNRS, 79360 Villiers en Bois, France Summary 1. Many phylogenetic lineages of animals have undergone major habitat transitions, stimulating dramatic phenotypic changes as adaptations to the novel environment. Although most such traits clearly reflect genetic modification, phenotypic plasticity may have been significant in the initial transition between habitat types. 2. Elapid snakes show multiple phylogenetic shifts from terrestrial to aquatic life. We raised young tigersnakes (a terrestrial taxon closely related to sea-snakes) in either a terrestrial or aquatic environment for a 5-month period. 3. The snakes raised in water were able to swim 26% faster, but crawled 36% more slowly, than did their terrestrially-raised siblings. A full stomach impaired locomotor performance, but snakes were less impaired when tested in the environment in which they had been raised. 4. Thus, adaptively plastic responses to local environments may have facilitated aquatic performance (and impaired terrestrial performance) in ancestral snakes as they shifted from terrestrial to aquatic existence. 5. Such plasticity may have influenced the rate or route of this evolutionary transition between habitats, and should be considered when comparing habitat-specific locomotor abilities of present-day aquatic and terrestrial species. key-words: development, elapid, locomotion, phenotype Functional Ecology (2007) 21, 1154–1161 doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2435.2007.01310.x that vary over small spatial and temporal scales.
    [Show full text]
  • Predators in the 'Hood
    NEWSFOCUS on October 3, 2013 www.sciencemag.org At home. An American black bear roamed downtown Predators in the ‘Hood Aspen, Colorado, on a summer night. especially in cities of the western United States, seem willing to have them back, says As cougars, coyotes, and bears spread into backyards and downtowns, Stanley Gehrt, a wildlife biologist at Ohio science is helping to show how people and predators can coexist State University, Columbus, who tracks Downloaded from Chicago’s coyotes. That leaves scientists, TWO YEARS AGO, IN JUNE 2011, A COUGAR Once hunted nearly to extinction in conservationists, and wildlife managers wandered through backyards and peered the lower 48, America’s biggest preda- all scrambling to figure out how to best into homes in Milford, Connecticut, the tors are making a remarkable comeback. manage animals that literally live next door fi rst mountain lion in that state in more than Their return has sparked a range of emo- and are capable of killing humans. “If you’re 100 years. Later that same year, a gray wolf tions, from surprise and joy to demands that interested in large carnivores, it’s a very crossed the Oregon border into California, the the animals be harshly controlled, if not exciting time,” Gehrt says. “There are more fi rst wolf in that state in more than 80 years. shot outright. Europe is expe- people than ever and yet we’re Black bears now lumber through subdivisions riencing a similar resurgence, seeing a resurgence and accep- in Ohio and Missouri, states that were bearless and similar reactions (Science, Online tance of these predators.
    [Show full text]
  • 124214015 Full.Pdf
    PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI DEFENSE MECHANISM ADOPTED BY THE PROTAGONISTS AGAINST THE TERROR OF DEATH IN K.A APPLEGATE’S ANIMORPHS AN UNDERGRADUATE THESIS Presented as Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Sarjana Sastra in English Letters By MIKAEL ARI WIBISONO Student Number: 124214015 ENGLISH LETTERS STUDY PROGRAM DEPARTMENT OF ENGLISH LETTERS FACULTY OF LETTERS SANATA DHARMA UNIVERSITY YOGYAKARTA 2016 PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI DEFENSE MECHANISM ADOPTED BY THE PROTAGONISTS AGAINST THE TERROR OF DEATH IN K.A APPLEGATE’S ANIMORPHS AN UNDERGRADUATE THESIS Presented as Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Sarjana Sastra in English Letters By MIKAEL ARI WIBISONO Student Number: 124214015 ENGLISH LETTERS STUDY PROGRAM DEPARTMENT OF ENGLISH LETTERS FACULTY OF LETTERS SANATA DHARMA UNIVERSITY YOGYAKARTA 2016 ii PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI A SarjanaSastra Undergraduate Thesis DEFENSE MECIIAMSM ADOPTED BY TITE AGAINST PROTAGOMSTS THE TERROR OT OTATTT IN K.A APPLEGATE'S AAUMORPHS By Mikael Ari Wibisono Student Number: lz4ll4}ls Defended before the Board of Examiners On August 25,2A16 and Declared Acceptable BOARD OF EXAMINERS Name Chairperson Dr. F.X. Siswadi, M.A. Secretary Dra. Sri Mulyani, M.A., ph.D / Member I Dr. F.X. Siswadi, M.A. Member2 Drs. HirmawanW[ianarkq M.Hum. Member 3 Elisa DwiWardani, S.S., M.Hum Yogyakarta, August 31 z}rc Faculty of Letters fr'.arrr s41 Dharma University s" -_# 1,ffi QG*l(tls srst*\. \ tQrtnR<{l
    [Show full text]
  • Utah Wolf Management Plan
    UTAH WOLF MANAGEMENT PLAN Utah Division of Wildlife Resources Publication #: 05-17 Prepared by: The Utah Division of Wildlife Resources & The Utah Wolf Working Group UTAH WOLF MANAGEMENT PLAN Table of Contents List of Tables ........................................................................................... i List of Figures ......................................................................................... ii Executive Summary ................................................................................ iii Dedication ............................................................................................... iv Introduction ............................................................................................ 1 Part I. Gray Wolf Ecology and Natural History .................................... 4 Description ............................................................................................... 4 Distribution ............................................................................................... 4 Sign .......................................................................................................... 5 Taxonomy ................................................................................................ 5 Reproduction ............................................................................................ 6 Mortality .................................................................................................... 6 Social Ecology .........................................................................................
    [Show full text]