DOCSLIB.ORG

The Evidence Base for London's Local Industrial Strategy – Final Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Evidence Base for London's Local Industrial Strategy – Final Report The Evidence Base for London’s Local Industrial Strategy – Final report February 2020 The Evidence Base for London’s Local Industrial Strategy – Final report copyright Greater London Authority February 2020 Published by Greater London Authority City Hall The Queens Walk London SE1 2AA www.london.gov.uk Tel 020 7983 4000 Minicom 020 7983 4000 Acknowledgements GLA Economics would like to thank all colleagues at the GLA and in other organisations who contributed to this report, including: • Members of the Analytical Working Group, especially the ONS regional statisticians (Sukriti Verma and Tom Liu) for all their work on developing London-relevant statistics; • Gerard Burgess and Jorn Peters in the GLA Planning Directorate for their very valuable comments and contributions to Chapters 7 and 8; • Professor Stephen Roper at the Enterprise Research Centre (Warwick Business School) for his valuable advice on Chapter 6; • Central government colleagues on the Local Industrial Strategy Analytical Panel for their comments and suggestions. • The Local Industrial Strategy Evidence Base Independent Expert Panel – Professor Riccardo Crescenzi, Dr Margarethe Theseira and Professor Peter Tyler – for their extremely valuable reviewer comments. Cover photograph © Shutterstock For more information about this publication, please contact: GLA Economics Tel 020 7983 4000 Email [email protected] GLA Economics provides expert advice and analysis on London’s economy and the economic issues facing the capital. Data and analysis from GLA Economics form a basis for the policy and investment decisions facing the Mayor of London and the GLA group. GLA Economics uses a wide range of information and data sourced from third party suppliers within its analysis and reports. GLA Economics cannot be held responsible for the accuracy or timeliness of this information and data. The GLA will not be liable for any losses suffered or liabilities incurred by a party as a result of that party relying in any way on the information contained in this report. The Evidence Base for London’s Local Industrial Strategy – Final report Contents Executive summary ......................................................................................................................................... 2 1 Overview ................................................................................................................................................ 17 2 Productivity in London .......................................................................................................................... 32 3 Business Environment ............................................................................................................................ 47 4 People ................................................................................................................................................... 67 5 Infrastructure ......................................................................................................................................... 95 6 Ideas .................................................................................................................................................... 121 7 Places in London ................................................................................................................................. 152 8 London’s place in the UK .................................................................................................................... 173 Appendix to Chapter 2 ................................................................................................................................ 190 Appendix to Chapter 4 ................................................................................................................................ 191 Appendix to Chapter 6: London’s innovative sectors - strengths, opportunities and rationale for intervention ................................................................................................................................................ 193 GLA Economics 1 The Evidence Base for London’s Local Industrial Strategy – Final report Executive summary Introduction The Local Industrial Strategy (LIS) for London is an opportunity to shape a more inclusive and sustainable economy. One that improves living standards for all Londoners, creates opportunities across all parts of the city, supports the wider UK economy and is more environmentally sustainable. It is widely understood that improvements in productivity underpin increases in living standards and therefore are a necessary (although not sufficient) condition for inclusive growth. It is being increasingly recognised though (by the OECD among others) that the relationship also runs in the other direction – inequality can act as a drag on productivity. Policies that aim to address both inclusion and productivity – maximising synergies while managing potential trade-offs – are therefore needed to make progress towards the ultimate objective of inclusive growth1. In order to inform LIS development and priorities, the LIS evidence base report seeks to: • Reflect a wealth of evidence and analysis that the Greater London Authority (GLA) has developed over the years, including for example the Economic Evidence Base for London 2016, the draft London Plan 2017 and numerous technical publications by GLA Economics. • Consider future opportunities and challenges alongside the current strengths and weaknesses of London’s economy and recent history. • Provide, where feasible, more granular geographical detail to convey the complex and diverse nature of London’s economy. • Go beyond descriptive analysis to provide clear and useful policy insights. The rest of the Executive Summary introduces the overall theme for the London LIS; supporting productivity improvements to unlock more inclusive growth. It then provides an overview of the key findings on productivity in London and on the UK Industrial Strategy’s five foundations of productivity: Business Environment, People, Infrastructure, Ideas and Places. London’s economic performance London is a very successful economy; it has performed strongly over the past 20 years in terms of output and employment growth and it is pivotal to the UK economy. • London’s economic output (Gross Value Added - GVA) increased at an average rate of 3.1% per year between 1998 and 2017. In 2017 London’s GVA totalled £426.2 billion; twice the size of the economies of Scotland and Wales put together and accounting for 23.8% of UK GVA2. • London’s net contribution to the Exchequer in 2017/18 was around £34.3bn. • London’s level of productivity has historically been higher than in the rest of the country – between 19% and 31% higher than the UK average over the last 20 years3. Statistics based on different territorial definitions also point to London as being one of the most productive regions or metropolitan areas in Europe4. 1 See for example the blog by Gabriella Ramos (OECD Chief of Staff) for the OECD Forum 2016: http://www.oecd.org/social/productivity- equality-nexus.htm. 2 Based on the 2018 GVA release from the ONS - ONS (2018). ‘Regional gross value added (balanced) local authorities by NUTS1 region’. 3 Based on output per hour relative to the UK average (1997-2017). Source: ONS (2019), ‘Industry by region estimates of labour productivity: 2017’. 4 ONS (2018), ‘Regional and subregional productivity comparisons, UK and selected EU countries: 2014’, looking at regions, or OECD.Stat [accessed 19/06/2019], looking at metropolitan areas definitions. GLA Economics 2 The Evidence Base for London’s Local Industrial Strategy – Final report • The recession of 2008-09 was a serious hit for London’s economy given the contraction of key sectors in its economic base (especially the finance and insurance sector). On the other hand, London’s economy has shown a remarkable resilience in the post-recession years which other parts of the UK and of Europe lacked, especially in terms of jobs growth5. • Employment and unemployment rates are currently near historical highs/lows respectively (although unemployment rates in London have historically and consistently been above the UK average). • Notwithstanding Brexit-related uncertainty, long-term projections still point to London as a growing economy which will continue to create new employment. However, productivity growth in London has stalled since the financial crisis, as in the rest of the country. There are big differences in productivity performance between firms within sectors and between different parts of the city. • Running at just 0.3% per year on average, real productivity growth in London between 2010 and 2017 was more or less in-line with stalling productivity in the UK as a whole. • While most industry groups in London exhibit high levels of labour productivity compared to the rest of the UK, aggregate productivity benchmarks mask large variations in productivity performance between firms (and workers) within the same sectors. • GVA per hour worked in the most productive part of the capital (Inner London West) is over 42% higher than in the least productive part of London (Outer London South). Since 2010 productivity in real terms has actually declined in some parts of the capital6. The challenge of inclusive growth in London London has a major inequality problem, whether we look at wealth or income. Housing costs are a significant factor in determining this outcome. • New housing supply in London has failed to keep up with demand.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Tram Potential
    THE INTERNATIONAL LIGHT RAIL MAGAZINE www.lrta.org www.tautonline.com JULY 2019 NO. 979 GROWING LONDON’S TRAM POTENTIAL Brussels congress debates urban rail safety and sustainability Doha launches Metro Red line service US raises Chinese security concerns India plans ‘Metrolite’ for smaller cities Canberra Energy efficiency £4.60 Realising a 100-year Reduced waste and light rail ambition greater profitability 2019 ENTRIES OPEN NOW! SUPPORTED BY ColTram www.lightrailawards.com CONTENTS 244 The official journal of the Light Rail Transit Association 263 JULY 2019 Vol. 82 No. 979 www.tautonline.com EDITORIAL EDITOR – Simon Johnston [email protected] ASSOCIATE EDITOr – Tony Streeter [email protected] WORLDWIDE EDITOR – Michael Taplin [email protected] 256 NewS EDITOr – John Symons [email protected] SenIOR CONTRIBUTOR – Neil Pulling WORLDWIDE CONTRIBUTORS Tony Bailey, Richard Felski, Ed Havens, Andrew Moglestue, Paul Nicholson, Herbert Pence, Mike Russell, Nikolai Semyonov, Alain Senut, Vic Simons, Witold Urbanowicz, Bill Vigrass, Francis Wagner, Thomas Wagner, Philip Webb, Rick Wilson PRODUCTION – Lanna Blyth Tel: +44 (0)1733 367604 [email protected] NEWS 244 saving energy, saVING COST 258 Doha opens Metro Red line; US politicians Len Vossman explains some of the current DESIGN – Debbie Nolan raise Chinese security concerns; Brussels initiatives driving tramway and metro ADVertiSING celebrates ‘tramway 150’; Arizona’s Valley energy efficiency. COMMERCIAL ManageR – Geoff Butler Tel: +44 (0)1733 367610 Metro extends to Gilbert Rd; Bombardier [email protected] UK to build new Cairo monorail; Luas-style SYSTEMS FACTFILE: london trams 263 PUBLISheR – Matt Johnston system proposed for Ireland’s Cork; Neil Pulling looks at developments on the Kent-Essex tramway is feasible; India UK network formerly known as Tramlink.
    [Show full text]
  • Nottinghamshire's Sustainable Community Strategy
    Nottinghamshire’s Sustainable Community Strategy the nottinghamshire partnership all together better 2010-2020 Contents 1 Foreword 5 2 Introduction 7 3 Nottinghamshire - our vision for 2020 9 4 How we put this strategy together What is this document based on? 11 How this document links with other important documents 11 Our evidence base 12 5 Nottinghamshire - the timeline 13 6 Nottinghamshire today 15 7 Key background issues 17 8 Nottinghamshire’s economy - recession and recovery 19 9 Key strategic challenges 21 10 Our priorities for the future A greener Nottinghamshire 23 A place where Nottinghamshire’s children achieve their full potential 27 A safer Nottinghamshire 33 Health and well-being for all 37 A more prosperous Nottinghamshire 43 Making Nottinghamshire’s communities stronger 47 11 Borough/District community strategies 51 12 Next steps and contacts 57 Nottinghamshire’s Sustainable Community Strategy 2010-2020 l p.3 Appendices I The Nottinghamshire Partnership 59 II Underpinning principles 61 III Our evidence base 63 IV Consultation 65 V Nottinghamshire - the timeline 67 VI Borough/District chapters Ashfield 69 Bassetlaw 74 Broxtowe 79 Gedling 83 Mansfield 87 Newark and Sherwood 92 Rushcliffe 94 VII Case studies 99 VIII Other relevant strategies and action plans 105 IX Performance management - how will we know that we have achieved our targets? 107 X List of acronyms 109 XI Glossary of terms 111 XII Equality impact assessment 117 p.4 l Nottinghamshire’s Sustainable Community Strategy 2010-2020 1 l Foreword This document, the second community strategy for Nottinghamshire, outlines the key priorities for the county over the next ten years.
    [Show full text]
  • Sutton Link, Sutton Local Committee
    Sutton Link, Sutton Local Committee Daniel Doris - Major Scheme Programme Manager 6th September 2018 Background ● The Tram extension has been part of strategic planning policy for over 20 years. It is part of a shared aspiration to address the public transport deficit in South London, and support high quality sub-regional economic growth. ● Since 2013, Sutton and Merton have been working in collaboration with TfL, to undertake the necessary feasibility work to deliver the extension. ● A public consultation carried out by Sutton and Merton, supported by TfL, in 2014 received over 10,000 responses with 84% of people supporting the extension. In addition the scheme features in the Mayor’s Transport Strategy and Sutton’s Local Plan. ● TfL has publically committed £70m funding (from the Growth Fund). Furthermore, TfL have committed to undertaking the necessary feasibility works required to deliver a Transport & Works Act Order (TWAO) which is necessary to gain consent to deliver the scheme. The Benefits ● Extending the Tram network to Sutton would have a range of benefits for residents and businesses across south London addressing the lack of public transport investment in this part of outer London. ● The on road alignment (from Morden Road to Sutton Station, via St Helier Hospital) could improve access to Transport to 59,000* people in some of Sutton and Merton’s most deprived wards. ● It could facilitate the connections between key interchanges, such as Sutton station, Morden underground (Northern Line) and Wimbledon (National Rail Services and the District Line), improving connectivity for residents in both boroughs across south London and to central London.
    [Show full text]
  • Changes in the Ethnic Diversity of the Christian Population in England
    National Census 2001 and 2011 Changes in the Ethnic Diversity of the Christian Population in England between 2001 and 2011 East Midlands Region Council for Christian Unity 2014 CONTENTS Foreword from the Chair of the Council for Christian Unity Page 1 Summary and Headlines Page 2 Introduction Page 2 Christian Ethnicity - Comparison of 2001 and 2011 Census Data Page 5 In England Page 5 By region Page 8 Overall trends Page 24 Analysis of Regional data by local authority Page 27 Introduction Page 27 Tables and Figures Page 28 Annex 2 Muslim Ethnicity in England Page 52 Census 2001/2011 East Midlands CCU(14)C3 Changes in the Ethnic Diversity of the Christian Population in England between 2001 and 2011 Foreword from the Chair of the Council for Christian Unity There are great ecumenical, evangelistic, pastoral and missional challenges presented to all the Churches by the increasing diversity of Christianity in England. The comparison of Census data from 2001 and 2011about the ethnic diversity of the Christian population, which is set out in this report, is one element of the work the Council for Christian Unity is doing with a variety of partners in this area. We are very pleased to be working with the Research and Statistics Department and the Committee for Minority Ethnic Anglican Affairs at Church House, and with Churches Together in England on a number of fronts. We hope that the set of eight reports, for each of the eight regions of England, will be a helpful resource for Church Leaders, Dioceses, Districts and Synods, Intermediate Ecumenical Bodies and local churches.
    [Show full text]
  • The Concept of Identity in the East Midlands of England NATALIE
    The Concept of Identity in the East Midlands of England NATALIE BRABER Investigating feelings of identity in East Midlands adolescents Introduction When considering dialectal variation in the UK, linguists have frequently considered the North/South divide and the linguistic markers separating the two regions (see for example Trudgill, 1999; Wells, 1986). But it has been noted that this is not a straightforward division (e.g. Beal, 2008; Goodey, Gold, Duffett & Spencer, 1971; Montgomery, 2007; Wales, 2002). There are clear stereotypes for the North and South – but how do areas like the East Midlands fit into the picture? The boundaries between North and South are defined in different ways. Beal’s linguistic North does not include the East Midlands (Beal, 2008: 124- 5), neither does Wales’ (2002: 48). Trudgill states that in traditional dialectology the East Midlands area falls under ‘Central’ dialects, which come under the ‘Southern’ branch, but in modern dialectology it falls in the ‘North’. Hughes, Trudgill and Watt (2005: 70) contains a map which has the East Midlands in the North. Linguistically, the question has been raised whether there is a clear North/South boundary (see for example Upton (2012) where it is proposed that it is a transition zone). This paper revisits this question from the point of view of young people living in the East Midlands, to examine their sense of identity and whether this cultural divide is salient to them. The East Midlands is a problematic area in its definition geographically, and people may have difficulty in relating this to their own sense of identity.
    [Show full text]
  • Nottingham – 9/9A Carlton Road, Nottinghamshire NG3 2DG
    Nottingham – 9/9A Carlton Road, Nottinghamshire NG3 2DG Freehold Shop and Residential Investment Nottingham – 9/9A Carlton Road, Nottinghamshire NG3 2DG Freehold Shop and Residential Investment Investment Consideration: . Purchase Price: £125,000 . Gross Initial Yield: 6.67% . Rental Income: £8,340 p.a. VAT is NOT applicable to this property . Occupying a prominent roadside location . Convenient location, close to city centre . Comprises ground floor shop and a self-contained three-bedroom flat on the first and second floor . In a growth location with new developments nearby . Occupiers nearby include Motorpoint Arena, Pistachio, amongst other local traders Tenancies and Accommodation: Property Accommodation Lessee & Trade Term Current Rent £ p.a. Notes No. 9 Shop: 72.06 sq m (776 sq ft) Pantila Thai 5 years from £3,600 Note 1: FRI (Ground Floor Shop) Massage 1 June 2019 Note 2: Rent review on 01.06.20 and 01.06.22 No. 9A Flat - Comprises 3 Bedrooms, Living Room, Ktichen Individual 12 months £4,740 Note 1: AST (First/Second Floor Flat) and Bathroom since 2015 Note 2: Holding over 73 sq m (786 sq ft) Total £8,340 Nottingham – 9/9A Carlton Road, Nottinghamshire NG3 2DG Freehold Shop and Residential Investment Property Description: The property is arranged as a ground floor shop and a self-contained three-bedroom flat on the first and second floor. The property provides the following accommodation and dimensions: No. 9 (Ground Floor Shop): 72.06 sq m (776 sq ft) No. 9A (First/Second Floor Flat): 73 sq m (786 sq ft) Tenancy: The shop is at present let to Pantila Thai Massage for a term of 5 years from 1st June 2019 at a current rent of £3,600 per annum and the lease contains full repairing and insuring covenants.
    [Show full text]
  • Hotel Needs Assessment
    GVA RGA FINAL GVA 10 Stratton Street London W1J 8JR Hotel Needs Assessment Preston, Lancashire Prepared for: Preston City Council April 2013 Preston City Council Contents Contents 1. INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................................... 4 2. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................................................................... 6 3. PRESTON MARKET OVERVIEW........................................................................................................... 12 4. PRESTON HOTEL SUPPLY..................................................................................................................... 27 5. PRIMARY DEMAND RESEARCH ......................................................................................................... 38 6. PRESTON HOTEL PERFORMANCE ..................................................................................................... 43 7. HOTEL BENCHMARKING APPRAISAL................................................................................................ 48 8. HOTEL OPERATOR CONTEXT ............................................................................................................. 55 9. HOTEL DEVELOPMENT APPRAISAL ................................................................................................... 60 10. APPENDIX 1.........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Uclpartners Academic Health Science Partnership
    UCLPartners academic health science partnership Professor the Lord Ajay Kakkar, Chair, UCLPartners Professor Sir David Fish, Managing Director, UCLPartners Dr Charlie Davie, Director of UCLPartners AHSN Clare Panniker, Chief Executive, Basildon and Thurrock University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust What is UCLPartners? Six million population 23 healthcare organisations acute and 11 higher education institutes mental health trusts; community providers and research networks 20 Clinical Commissioning Groups (CCGs) Industry partnerships in research and 26 boroughs and local councils translation of innovation into health and wealth 2 Local Enterprise Partnership – key challenge • Working with the London Enterprise Panel, established by the Mayor of London • Professor Stephen Caddick, Vice Provost (Enterprise), UCL, is the only academic representative on the Panel • Key challenges of the panel: to compete with Boston and San Francisco; improve access to the NHS market to increase venture capital • How UCLPartners is contributing: working with industry to co-create technology and devices; creating long-term partnerships with industry and giving confidence to entrepreneurs, e.g. through new business models and procurement initiatives • Other areas of joint working: MedCity, Care City, London Health Commission, three London AHSNs and preparing to enable the success of the Francis Crick Institute 3 Defragmenting the pathway – an integrated journey to transform healthcare through innovation into practice Bringing together formal designations under
    [Show full text]
  • A13 Riverside Tunnel Road to Regeneration the Tunnel Is Essential to East London and Thames Gateway’S Economic Success the A13 Riverside Tunnel Road to Regeneration
    The A13 Riverside Tunnel Road to Regeneration The tunnel is essential to East London and Thames Gateway’s economic success The A13 Riverside Tunnel Road to Regeneration Thank you for taking the trouble to find out more about the proposed A13 Riverside Tunnel. The tunnelling of a 1.3km stretch of the A13 will not only improve traffic flow along this key route, mitigating the two notorious bottlenecks at the Lodge Avenue and Renwick Road junctions, but will also transform a severely blighted area. As well as creating a new neighbourhood of over 5,000 homes called Castle Green, the tunnel will act as a catalyst for the building of another 28,300 homes in London Riverside, while creating over 1,200 jobs and unlocking significant business and commercial growth in the surrounding area. The tunnel is essential to east London and the Thames Gateway’s economic success and will stimulate growth along its route as well as easing congestion. It also signifies a new way of working in this country adapted from successful models from other European cities. A large proportion of the scheme could be self-financing, with the majority of the funding being generated by the tunnel itself, through the land value uplift and sale of the homes, the community infrastructure levy and new homes bonus. If the government also supports our proposal for stamp duty devolution in Castle Green, then this would mean further significant funding for the scheme could be secured. Cllr Darren Rodwell Cllr Roger Ramsey Leader of Barking and Dagenham Council Leader of Havering Council Road to Regeneration 03 About the A13 The A13 is one of the busiest arterial routes into the capital, connecting the county of Essex with central London.
    [Show full text]
  • A Description of London's Economy Aaron Girardi and Joel Marsden March 2017
    Working Paper 85 A description of London's economy Aaron Girardi and Joel Marsden March 2017 A description of London's economy Working Paper 85 copyright Greater London Authority March 2017 Published by Greater London Authority City Hall The Queens Walk London SE1 2AA www.london.gov.uk Tel 020 7983 4922 Minicom 020 7983 4000 ISBN 978-1-84781-648-1 Cover photograph © London & Partners For more information about this publication, please contact: GLA Economics Tel 020 7983 4922 Email [email protected] GLA Economics provides expert advice and analysis on London’s economy and the economic issues facing the capital. Data and analysis from GLA Economics form a basis for the policy and investment decisions facing the Mayor of London and the GLA group. GLA Economics uses a wide range of information and data sourced from third party suppliers within its analysis and reports. GLA Economics cannot be held responsible for the accuracy or timeliness of this information and data. The GLA will not be liable for any losses suffered or liabilities incurred by a party as a result of that party relying in any way on the information contained in this report. A description of London's economy Working Paper 85 Contents Executive summary ...................................................................................................................... 2 1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 3 2 The structure of London’s local economies .........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Structures for Development: Getting Them Right
    1 Please do not quote until published, Feb 2008 Edwards, M (2008) 'Structures for development in Thames Gateway: getting them right' in London's Turning: the prospect of Thames Gateway Eds. Phil Cohen and Mike Rustin. London, Ashgate. Details at https://www.ashgate.com/shopping/title.asp?key1=&key2=&orig=results&isbn=0%207546%207063%205 Chapter sixteen Structures for development: getting them right Michael Edwards, Bartlett School of Planning, UCL The Thames Gateway is an enormous undertaking. In many respects it resembles some of the earlier major projects of British town planning like the Milton Keynes generation of new towns or the London's Docklands development. Like them, it may come to be regarded by some as a great achievement of public policy and by others as a great disaster. The fact that positive and negative views can be taken of the same project does not (or does not merely) reflect alternative subjective perspectives: it stems from the fact that there are real conflicts in the society and thus different criteria for judging success. The Thames Gateway project poses daunting choices for those with the power to decide on the future development of South East England. Government and the Mayor of London both agree that much of the wider South East's growth should be concentrated in the Thames estuary (DCMS 2006; Mayor of London 2004). They share the intention that London will expand to the East, not to the West, and that the rationality of capitalist growth is the unquestionable way forward. This chapter explores aspects of this supposed rationality, arguing that the aspirations of 'sustainability' and 'community' cannot be achieved in the neo-liberal framework which is on offer.
    [Show full text]
  • Competition, Cooperation, Co-Opetition. a Conceptualization of the ‘Network Brand’
    Competition, Cooperation, Co-opetition. A conceptualization of the ‘Network Brand’ Cecilia Pasquinelli Istituto di Management, Scuola Superiore Sant’Anna Abstract - Place branding relies on the assumption of inter-territorial competition which seems to be the overall approach to place management. Competition involves not only cities but also provinces, nations, states, villages and supra-national regions. However, there is room for sustaining that competition is not an exhaustive key for understanding regional development and, consequently, for interpreting place marketing and branding. Within the general frame of competition, regions and local areas may seek inter- territorial cooperation in order to enrich their offer and enhance their competitiveness. In this regard, a gap in place branding and marketing literature is identified and this paper contributes to filling it, by proposing a conceptualization of the “network brand”. Assuming cooperation/co-opetition as a way to face inter-territorial competition, this research is in charge of answering to the following research questions. Firstly, to what extent network and network brand building is a pragmatic process i.e. inspired by market principles, rather than being a political process i.e. highly related to power game emerging within and among the involved territories? Secondly, to what extent the network brand is a “post-modern” brand? A secondary research was carried out by reviewing 12 inter-territorial networking experiences in Europe and US. Concerning the first research question, evidence suggests that, beyond a surface of pragmatism, there might be a political process leading to the emergence of a network brand. Moreover, there is a chance that in some cases a pragmatic approach to networking tends to turn into a political process by means of institutional spillovers, turning the network into a political arena.
    [Show full text]