DOCSLIB.ORG

The American Community—American Indians and Alaska Natives: 2004 1 (I.E., Including Those Who Reported Table 2

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The American Community—American Indians and Alaska Natives: 2004 1 (I.E., Including Those Who Reported Table 2 The American Community— American Indians and Alaska Natives: 2004 Issued May 2007 American Community Survey Reports ACS-07 U.S. Department of Commerce U S C E N S U S B U R E A U Economics and Statistics Administration U.S. CENSUS BUREAU Helping You Make Informed Decisions Acknowledgments This report was drafted for the U.S. Census Bureau’s Racial Statistics Branch by staff of the Pew Hispanic Center, Washington, DC (Roberto Suro, Rakesh Kocchar, Jeffrey Passel, Gabriel Escobar, Sonya Tafoya, Richard Fry, Dulce Benevides, and Michelle Wunsch). Edward Spar and Frederick J. Cavanaugh of Sabre Systems, Inc. provided initial review of the report. Direction for the report was provided by Jorge H. del Pinal, former Assistant Division Chief, Special Population Statistics, Population Division. Overall direction was provided by Howard Hogan, Associate Director for Demographic Programs, and Enrique J. Lamas, Chief, Population Division. The report was finalized by Nicholas A. Jones, Population Division. Within the Population Division, Frank B. Hobbs and Claudette E. Bennett provided subject matter review and guid- ance; Stella U. Ogunwole, Letha L. Clinton, and Maryam Asi provided principal statistical assistance; and Anika Juhn and Pedro Martinez prepared the maps. Principal editorial review and guid- ance was provided by Marjorie F. Hanson, Data Integration Division. In addition, Lisa M. Blumerman, Kenneth R. Bryson, and Deborah H. Griffin of the American Community Survey Office provided helpful comments on this report. Dale Garrett, under the guidance of Alfredo Navarro and Anthony G. Tersine, Jr. of the Decennial Statistical Studies Division, conducted sampling review. Jan Sweeney, Theodora Forgione, and Jamie Peters of the Administrative and Customer Services Division, Walter C. Odom, Chief, provided publications and printing management, graphics design and composition, and editorial review for print and electronic media. General direction and production management were provided by Wanda Cevis, Chief, Publications Services Branch. The American Community— American Indians and Alaska Natives: 2004 INTRODUCTION Table 1. Household Population by Race and Hispanic Origin: 2004 This report presents a portrait of the (Data based on sample limited to the household population and exclude the population living in American Indian and Alaska Native institutions, college dormitories, and other group quarters. For information on confidentiality 1 protection, sampling error, nonsampling error, and definitions, see population in the United States. It is http://factfinder.census.gov/home/en/datanotes/exp_acs2004.html) part of the American Community Survey (ACS) report series. Percent of Race and Hispanic origin total Margin of Information on demographic, social, Population population error1 (±) economic, and housing characteris- Total . ................. 285,691,501 100.00 (X) tics in the tables and figures is based on data from the 2004 ACS White alone, not Hispanic . 192,362,875 67.33 0.01 Selected Population Profiles and American Indian and Alaska Native alone2 ... 2,151,322 0.75 0.02 Detailed Tables.2 The data for the Not Hispanic . 1,852,775 0.65 0.01 Hispanic . ................ 298,547 0.10 0.01 American Indian and Alaska Native population are based on responses American Indian and Alaska Native alone or in combination . .............. 4,006,160 1.40 0.02 to the 2004 ACS question on race, Not Hispanic . .................. 3,445,472 1.21 0.02 which asked all respondents to Hispanic . ......... 560,688 0.20 0.02 report one or more races.3 American Indian and Alaska Native in combination . 1,854,838 0.65 0.02 The 2004 ACS estimated the num- Not Hispanic . ............... 1,592,697 0.56 0.02 ber of American Indians and Alaska Hispanic . ................ 262,141 0.09 0.01 Natives to be about 4 million, or American Indian and Alaska Native and 1.4 percent of the U.S. household White . 1,370,675 0.48 0.02 4 population (Table 1). The number (X) Not applicable. of individuals who reported 1 This number, when added to and subtracted from the estimate, produces the 90-percent confidence interval around the estimate. American Indian and Alaska Native 2 This category includes people who reported only ‘‘American Indian or Alaska Native,’’ either by specifying one or more American Indian or Alaska Native tribes or tribal groupings or by responding with as their only race was about a generic term such as ‘‘American Indian’’ or ‘‘Alaska Native.’’ 2.2 million, or 0.8 percent of the Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2004 American Community Survey, Selected Population Profiles, population. About another 1.9 mil- S0201. lion reported their race as American Indian and Alaska Native including about 1.4 million people Data are reported for both the and one or more other races, who reported their race as American Indian and Alaska Native- American Indian and Alaska Native alone and the American Indian and 1 In the federal government, the category and White.5 The American Indian Alaska Native-alone-or-in- “American Indian or Alaska Native” refers to and Alaska Native-alone-or-in-com- combination populations. In this people having origins in any of the original peoples of North and South America (includ- bination population included about report, respondents who reported ing Central America) who maintain tribal 561,000 Hispanics, and the American Indian and Alaska Native affiliation or community attachment. 2 The 2004 ACS datasets, including American Indian and Alaska Native- and no other race are included in Selected Population Profiles and Detailed alone population included about the single-race or American Indian Tables, are available online in the American 6 FactFinder at <http://factfinder.census.gov>. 299,000 Hispanics. and Alaska Native-alone population 3 For further information on the content and format of the questionnaire, see <www.census.gov/acs/www/Downloads 5 The race-in-combination categories use Estimates may vary from the actual values /SQuest03.pdf>. the conjunction and in bold and italicized because of sampling error and other factors. 4 This report discusses data for the print to link the race groups that compose All comparative statements have undergone United States, including the 50 states and the combination. statistical testing and are significant at the the District of Columbia; it does not include 6 The estimates in this report are based 90-percent confidence level unless otherwise data for Puerto Rico. on responses from a sample of households. noted. U.S. Census Bureau The American Community—American Indians and Alaska Natives: 2004 1 (i.e., including those who reported Table 2. their race as one or more American American Indian and Alaska Native Household Population by Tribal Group: 2004 Indian and Alaska Native tribes and (Data based on sample limited to the household population and exclude the population living in no other race). Respondents who institutions, college dormitories, and other group quarters. For information on confidentiality protection, reported American Indian and sampling error, nonsampling error, and definitions, see http://factfinder.census.gov/home/en/datanotes/exp_acs2004.html) Alaska Native either alone or with one or more other race categories Percent of are included in the American American Indian and Tribal group Indian and Alaska Native-alone-or- Alaska Native- in-combination population. The alone Margin of 1 ± report also includes data for the Population population error ( ) non-Hispanic segments of these American Indian and 2 populations. Alaska Native alone ........... 2,151,322 100.0 (X) American Indian tribal grouping, specified . 1,729,574 80.4 0.88 Data on individuals who reported Apache . 66,048 3.1 0.63 that they were American Indian Blackfeet . 39,508 1.8 1.13 and Alaska Native and White, a Cherokee . ........... 331,491 15.4 0.83 Cheyenne . ......... 15,715 0.7 0.35 part of the in-combination popula- Chickasaw . ........ 12,773 0.6 0.27 tion, are shown separately in this Chippewa . ................ 92,041 4.3 0.47 report in the American Indian and Choctaw . 55,107 2.6 0.47 Creek . 27,243 1.3 0.26 Alaska Native and White category. Iroquois . .......... 50,982 2.4 0.51 Lumbee . 59,433 2.8 0.25 The term “American Indian and Navajo . 230,401 10.7 1.20 Alaska Native” is used to refer to Osage . ............. 13,982 0.6 0.25 0.16 the American Indian and Alaska Ottawa . ................ 12,824 0.6 Paiute . ............. 14,944 0.7 0.23 Native-alone population and the Pima . ............ 48,709 2.3 1.35 term “non-Hispanic White” is used Potawatomi . ........ 14,952 0.7 0.21 0.70 to refer to the White-alone, not Pueblo . ............ 69,203 3.2 Seminole . 12,578 0.6 0.29 Hispanic population. In the report Sioux . ......................... 67,666 3.1 0.70 graphics, the acronym “AIAN” is Tohono O’Odham . ................ 20,577 1.0 0.31 0.22 used to refer to the American Indian Yaqui . .......... 16,169 0.8 Yuman . ............ 10,419 0.5 0.78 and Alaska Native population. All other American Indian tribes3 ......... 446,809 20.8 1.27 American Indian tribes, not specified . 45,736 2.1 0.35 The American Indian and Alaska Alaska Native tribes, specified . ..... 89,462 4.2 0.37 Native population includes people Alaska Athabascan . .......... 12,370 0.6 0.17 who reported American Indian and Aleut . 11,037 0.5 0.16 Alaska Native or wrote in their Eskimo . ............. 35,951 1.7 1.16 Tlingit-Haida . ................. 18,677 0.9 0.67 principal or enrolled tribe or tribes All other Alaska Native tribes4 ........... 11,427 0.5 0.73 on the ACS question on race. Alaska Native tribes, not specified . 11,808 0.5 0.09 American Indian tribes or Alaska Native Among American Indians, Cherokee tribes, not specified5 ..................... 274,742 12.8 0.90 was the largest tribal grouping, (X) Not applicable.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • CMS Serving American Indians and Alaska Natives in California
    Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Serving American Indians and Alaska Natives in California Serving American Indians and Alaska Natives Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) staff work with beneficiaries, health care providers, state government, CMS contractors, community groups and others to provide education and address questions in California. American Indians and Alaska Natives If you have questions about CMS programs in relation to American Indians or Alaska Natives: • email the CMS Division of Tribal Affairs at [email protected], or • contact a CMS Native American Contact (NAC). For a list of NAC and their information, visit https://go.cms.gov/NACTAGlist Why enroll in CMS programs? When you sign up for Medicaid, the Children’s Health Insurance Program, or Medicare, the Indian health hospitals and clinics can bill these programs for services provided. Enrolling in these programs brings money into the health care facility, which is then used to hire more staff, pay for new equipment and building renovations, and saves Purchased and Referred Care dollars for other patients. Patients who enroll in CMS programs are not only helping themselves and others, but they’re also supporting their Indian health care hospital and clinics. Assistance in California To contact Indian Health Service in California, contact the California Area at (916) 930–3927. Find information about coverage and Indian health facilities in California. These facilities are shown on the maps in the next pages. Medicare California Department of Insurance 1 (800) 927–4357 www.insurance.ca.gov/0150-seniors/0300healthplans/ Medicaid/Children’s Health Medi-Cal 1 (916) 552–9200 www.dhcs.ca.gov/services/medi-cal Marketplace Coverage Covered California 1 (800) 300–1506 www.coveredca.com Northern Feather River Tribal Health— Oroville California 2145 5th Ave.
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 Profile of American Indians and Alaska Natives Age 65 and Over
    2018 Profile of American Indians and Alaska Natives Age 65 and Over October 2019 The Administration for Community Living, which includes the Administration on Aging, is an operating division of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. 1 Introduction In 2017, there were 50.9 million Americans age 65 and over and 6.5 million age 85 and over. The population age 65 and older is expected to increase to 94.7 million in 2060. The population age 85 and older is expected to more than double to 19 million during the same period. Among the population age 65 and over, there were 125 women for every 100 men. At age 85 and over, this ratio increased to 184 women for every 100 men. Along with these general trends for America’s older population, the American Indian and Alaska Native older population is also growing. Population and Projections of American Indians and Alaska Natives 65 and Over: 2017-2060 700,000 648,555 600,000 550,023 503,300 500,000 442,824 400,000 308,627 300,000 272,250 200,000 100,000 0 2017 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060 Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Population Estimates, 2017 and Population Projections, 2017 (revised) Note: Increments in years are uneven. Lighter bars indicate projections. The terms American Indians and Alaska Natives refer to American Indians and Alaska Natives who are not Hispanic and do not identify as more than one race. The non-Hispanic American Indian and Alaska Native population age 65 and over was 272,250 in 2017 and is projected to grow to more than 648,000 by 2060.
    [Show full text]
  • The Case of the Missing Ethnicity: Indians Without
    THE CASE OF THE MISSING ETHNICITY: INDIANS WITHOUT TRIBES IN THE 21ST CENTURY by Carolyn A. Liebler * University of Minnesota and Meghan Zacher * University of Minnesota CES 11-17 June, 2011 The research program of the Center for Economic Studies (CES) produces a wide range of economic analyses to improve the statistical programs of the U.S. Census Bureau. Many of these analyses take the form of CES research papers. The papers have not undergone the review accorded Census Bureau publications and no endorsement should be inferred. Any opinions and conclusions expressed herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the views of the U.S. Census Bureau. All results have been reviewed to ensure that no confidential information is disclosed. Republication in whole or part must be cleared with the authors. To obtain information about the series, see www.census.gov/ces or contact Cheryl Grim, Editor, Discussion Papers, U.S. Census Bureau, Center for Economic Studies 2K130B, 4600 Silver Hill Road, Washington, DC 20233, [email protected]. Abstract Among American Indians and Alaska Natives, most aspects of ethnicity are tightly associated with the person’s tribal origins. Language, history, foods, land, and traditions differ among the hundreds of tribes indigenous to the United States. Why did almost one million of them fail to respond to the tribal affiliation part of the Census 2000 race question? We investigate four hypotheses about why one-third of multiracial American Indians and one-sixth of single-race American Indians did not report a tribe: (1) survey item non-response which undermines all fill- in-the-blank questions, (2) a non-salient tribal identity, (3) a genealogy-based affiliation, and (4) mestizo identity which does not require a tribe.
    [Show full text]
  • LAYSAN ALBATROSS Phoebastria Immutabilis
    Alaska Seabird Information Series LAYSAN ALBATROSS Phoebastria immutabilis Conservation Status ALASKA: High N. AMERICAN: High Concern GLOBAL: Vulnerable Breed Eggs Incubation Fledge Nest Feeding Behavior Diet Nov-July 1 ~ 65 d 165 d ground scrape surface dip fish, squid, fish eggs and waste Life History and Distribution Laysan Albatrosses (Phoebastria immutabilis) breed primarily in the Hawaiian Islands, but they inhabit Alaskan waters during the summer months to feed. They are the 6 most abundant of the three albatross species that visit 200 en Alaska. l The albatross has been described as the “true nomad ff Pok e of the oceans.” Once fledged, it remains at sea for three to J ht ig five years before returning to the island where it was born. r When birds are eight or nine years old they begin to breed. y The breeding season is November to July and the rest of Cop the year, the birds remain at sea. Strong, effortless flight is commonly seen in the southern Bering Sea, Aleutian the key to being able to spend so much time in the air. The Islands, and the northwestern Gulf of Alaska. albatross takes advantage of air currents just above the Nonbreeders may remain in Alaska throughout the year ocean's waves to soar in perpetual fluid motion. It may not and breeding birds are known to travel from Hawaii to flap its wings for hours, or even for days. The aerial Alaska in search of food for their young. Albatrosses master never touches land outside the breeding season, but have the ability to concentrate the food they catch and it does rest on the water to feed and sleep.
    [Show full text]
  • Find Alaska Info!
    Find Alaska Info! Dear Student: Thank you for writing to request information about Alaska. This fl yer contains some interesting information about our great state. Alaska became the 49th state in 1959, right before Hawaii became the 50th state that same year. Many of Alaska’s 722,200 people live in modern cities, and many live in small remote villages where their families have lived for thousands of years. The population of Anchorage, Alaska’s largest city, is 296,000. Juneau (population 32,300) is the State Capital.. We also have a website where you can learn more about Alaska’s history, cultures, geography, animals, and more: http://alaska.gov/kids/ Here are other helpful websites: • For information about visiting Alaska, visit www.travelalaska.com • You can also visit the Alaska State Library on-line at www.lam.alaska.gov • Looking for wildlife info? Go to http://www.wildlife.alaska.gov • Want to know more about Alaska’s Forest and Park Lands? visit www.alaskacenters.gov Did you know? If you place Alaska, with all of its islands, on top of the “continental” United States, it spans from the Great Lakes to Texas, and from Florida to California. At 591,000 square miles, Alaska is larger than Texas, California, and Montana combined. The coastline of Alaska is longer than the coastline of the continental United States. Of Alaska’s 3 million lakes, the largest (Lake Iliamna) is the size of Connecticut. Alaska’s mainland is only 51 miles away from Russia. Alaska has 17 of the 20 highest mountains in North America (Denali is the highest at 20,320 feet).
    [Show full text]
  • State Abbreviations
    State Abbreviations Postal Abbreviations for States/Territories On July 1, 1963, the Post Office Department introduced the five-digit ZIP Code. At the time, 10/1963– 1831 1874 1943 6/1963 present most addressing equipment could accommodate only 23 characters (including spaces) in the Alabama Al. Ala. Ala. ALA AL Alaska -- Alaska Alaska ALSK AK bottom line of the address. To make room for Arizona -- Ariz. Ariz. ARIZ AZ the ZIP Code, state names needed to be Arkansas Ar. T. Ark. Ark. ARK AR abbreviated. The Department provided an initial California -- Cal. Calif. CALIF CA list of abbreviations in June 1963, but many had Colorado -- Colo. Colo. COL CO three or four letters, which was still too long. In Connecticut Ct. Conn. Conn. CONN CT Delaware De. Del. Del. DEL DE October 1963, the Department settled on the District of D. C. D. C. D. C. DC DC current two-letter abbreviations. Since that time, Columbia only one change has been made: in 1969, at the Florida Fl. T. Fla. Fla. FLA FL request of the Canadian postal administration, Georgia Ga. Ga. Ga. GA GA Hawaii -- -- Hawaii HAW HI the abbreviation for Nebraska, originally NB, Idaho -- Idaho Idaho IDA ID was changed to NE, to avoid confusion with Illinois Il. Ill. Ill. ILL IL New Brunswick in Canada. Indiana Ia. Ind. Ind. IND IN Iowa -- Iowa Iowa IOWA IA Kansas -- Kans. Kans. KANS KS A list of state abbreviations since 1831 is Kentucky Ky. Ky. Ky. KY KY provided at right. A more complete list of current Louisiana La. La.
    [Show full text]
  • Protecting the Civil Rights of American Indians and Alaska Natives
    Indian Working Group U.S. Department of Justice Introduction harm. The Division also protects inmates’ right [email protected] Civil Rights Division American Indians and Alaska Natives are to practice their religion without unnecessary The Division’s Indian Working Group helps the protected by federal civil rights laws. The Civil restriction. The laws we enforce do not cover Division enforce the laws and meet its Rights Division of the U.S. Department of federal facilities. Contact the Special Litigation responsibilities to Indian Country and Native Justice enforces federal laws barring Section to make a complaint. American people. The Working Group increases discrimination based on a person’s race, color, awareness of Native American civil rights issues Protecting the Civil Rights national origin, gender, sexual orientation, Police Misconduct within the Civil Rights Division, within the disability, or religion. National origin www.justice.gov/crt/split Department of Justice, and throughout the of American Indians discrimination includes failure to provide It is illegal for state or local law enforcement country. You may contact the Indian Working and Alaska Natives language services such as interpreters or offices to systematically deprive people of their Group by email at: translations for people who don’t speak English. rights. Federal laws protect people from [email protected]. The law forbids discrimination in education, constitutional violations such as excessive force; employment, credit, housing, public unlawful stops, searches, or arrests; and accommodations, voting, and in federally- discriminatory policing. We investigate For further information, or to funded and conducted programs, as well as hate misconduct based on race, color, national origin, file a complaint: crimes.
    [Show full text]
  • Overseas Expansion: Global Competition Over Resources and Power Led to American Expansion and Creating a Pacific Influence Empire
    Name __________________________________ Date _____________ S. S. 8 Statement of Inquiry Overseas Expansion: Global competition over resources and power led to American expansion and Creating a Pacific influence Empire ALASKA Prior to 1860, the Russians had a profitable seal and sea otter fur industry established off the coast of Alaska. After 1860, however, the Russians had killed off most of the furbearing animals. Russian interest in Alaska began to decline and the Russian government was looking to sell the land. In 1867, Russia offered to sell Alaska to the United States for $7.2 million. Secretary of State William Seward (under President Andrew Johnson) was interested in this offer. He argued that it was a great value at only 2 cents per acre and could provide natural resources such as fish, lumber, and minerals. It would also give the United States important seaports for dominating trade in the Pacific. Seward argued that if the United States did not purchase Alaska, another powerful nation would. However, some Americans objected to the purchase. They said that Alaska was a worthless wasteland. They called Alaska “Seward’s Icebox,” the “Polar Bear Garden” and “Seward’s Folly.” (folly=foolish) Others argued that the United States had no right to buy “outside territory,” land not connected to the United States. Seward finally won out. In April 1867, the United States agreed to purchase Alaska from the Russians. As a result of the purchase, the United States added about 600,000 square miles of land to its territory for only $7,200,000. Many Americans realized that this purchase was no mistake.
    [Show full text]
  • Multiracial in America Proud, Diverse and Growing in Numbers
    NUMBERS, FACTS AND TRENDS SHAPING THE WORLD FOR RELEASE JUNE 11, 2015 Multiracial in America Proud, Diverse and Growing in Numbers FOR FURTHER INFORMATION ON THIS REPORT: Kim Parker, Director of Social Trends Research Rich Morin, Senior Editor Juliana Menasce Horowitz, Associate Director Mark Hugo Lopez, Director of Hispanic Research Molly Rohal, Communications Manager 202.419.4372 www.pewresearch.org RECOMMENDED CITATION: Pew Research Center. 2015. “Multiracial in America: Proud, Diverse and Growing in Numbers.” Washington, D.C.: June 1 PEW RESEARCH CENTER About This Report This report, produced by Pew Research Center, examines the attitudes, experiences and demographic characteristics of multiracial Americans. The findings are based on data from two primary sources: A nationally representative survey of 1,555 multiracial Americans ages 18 and older, conducted online from Feb. 6 to April 6, 2015, and Pew Research analyses of data collected by the U.S. Census Bureau. Pew Research Center is a nonpartisan “fact tank” that informs the public about the issues, attitudes and trends shaping America and the world. It does not take policy positions. The center conducts public opinion polling, demographic research, content analysis and other data-driven social science research. It studies U.S. politics and policy; journalism and media; internet, science and technology; religion and public life; Hispanic trends; global attitudes and trends; and U.S. social and demographic trends. All of the center’s reports are available at www.pewresearch.org. Pew Research Center is a subsidiary of The Pew Charitable Trusts, its primary funder. While Pew Research Center is solely responsible for the content of this report, we received invaluable advice from Ann Morning, associate professor of Sociology at New York University; Aliya Saperstein, assistant professor of sociology at Stanford University; and Taeku Lee, professor of political science and law at the University of California, Berkeley.
    [Show full text]
  • Applied Cultural Anthropology in Alaska: New Directions Kerry D
    APPLIED CULTURAL ANTHROPOLOGY IN ALASKA: NEW DIRECTIONS Kerry D. Feldman Department of Anthropology, University of Alaska Anchorage, Anchorage, AK 99508; [email protected] INTRODUCTION This volume of the Alaska Journal of Anthropology (AJA) to an expanded post-colonial collaboration in Alaska brings together papers presented at the 2006 meet- anthropology, it is hoped that more essays by Alaska ing of the Society for Applied Anthropology (SfAA) in Native scholars and researchers will be submitted to AJA. Vancouver, B.C. In response to a request by the president The two papers by Smith et al. on nutrition among ru- of SfAA for a significant “Alaska presence” at this most ral and urban Alaska Natives were also primarily written northerly conference ever held by the SfAA, thirty-three by non anthropologists (co-author Wiedman of Florida papers were solicited and presented, many in the area of International University is an anthropologist and former cultural resource management (CRM), the rest in applied president of the National Association for the Practice of cultural anthropology. Although not the focus of this vol- Anthropology); other co-authors of this paper are mem- ume, CRM research is also a significant form of applied bers of Alaska tribal elders councils. Urban and applied archaeology/anthropology in Alaska, requiring in its full research often involves interdisciplinary and collaborative dimension a clear delineation of the human/cultural as- efforts as is evident in these papers. pects of such work and, where appropriate, framing the Finally, no prior volume of AJA has focused on ap- results in relevant anthropological theory.
    [Show full text]
  • Resource for Self-Determination Or Perpetuation of Linguistic Imposition: Examining the Impact of English Learner Classification Among Alaska Native Students
    EdWorkingPaper No. 21-420 Resource for Self-Determination or Perpetuation of Linguistic Imposition: Examining the Impact of English Learner Classification among Alaska Native Students Ilana M. Umansky Manuel Vazquez Cano Lorna M. Porter University of Oregon University of Oregon University of Oregon Federal law defines eligibility for English learner (EL) classification differently for Indigenous students compared to non-Indigenous students. Indigenous students, unlike non-Indigenous students, are not required to have a non-English home or primary language. A critical question, therefore, is how EL classification impacts Indigenous students’ educational outcomes. This study explores this question for Alaska Native students, drawing on data from five Alaska school districts. Using a regression discontinuity design, we find evidence that among students who score near the EL classification threshold in kindergarten, EL classification has a large negative impact on Alaska Native students’ academic outcomes, especially in the 3rd and 4th grades. Negative impacts are not found for non-Alaska Native students in the same districts. VERSION: June 2021 Suggested citation: Umansky, Ilana, Manuel Vazquez Cano, and Lorna Porter. (2021). Resource for Self-Determination or Perpetuation of Linguistic Imposition: Examining the Impact of English Learner Classification among Alaska Native Students. (EdWorkingPaper: 21-420). Retrieved from Annenberg Institute at Brown University: https://doi.org/10.26300/mym3-1t98 ALASKA NATIVE EL RD Resource for Self-Determination or Perpetuation of Linguistic Imposition: Examining the Impact of English Learner Classification among Alaska Native Students* Ilana M. Umansky Manuel Vazquez Cano Lorna M. Porter * As authors, we’d like to extend our gratitude and appreciation for meaningful discussion and feedback which shaped the intent, design, analysis, and writing of this study.
    [Show full text]
  • Working with American Indians and Alaska Natives Information and Tips for Agents and Brokers
    Working with American Indians and Alaska Natives Information and Tips for Agents and Brokers The Health Insurance Marketplace1 benefits American Indians and Alaska Natives (AI/ANs) by providing increased opportunities for affordable health coverage. This coverage can be through a qualified health plan (QHP) bought in the Marketplace, or through Medicaid or the Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP). For purposes of the Marketplace and this document, members of federally recognized Indian tribes and Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act (ANCSA) Corporation shareholders (regional or village) are referred to as AI/ANs. Indian Health Care Programs Many AI/ANs currently receive health care from Indian health care providers, which include health programs operated by the Indian Health Service (IHS), tribes and tribal organizations, and urban Indian organizations. These health programs are sometimes called ITUs (IHS/ Tribal/Urban), but are referred to in this document as Indian health care providers. Based on the Federal Government’s relationship with Indian tribes, health care is provided at no cost to AI/ANs. If AI/ANs enroll in QHPs through the Marketplace, they can continue to receive services from their local Indian health care provider. Indian health care providers can bill QHPs for services provided to their patients and the reimbursements collected benefit the entire tribal community. Marketplace Protections The Marketplace provides certain protections for AI/ANs: 1 Health Insurance MarketplaceSM and MarketplaceSM are service marks of the United States Department of Health & Human Services. When used in this document, the term “Health Insurance Marketplace” or “Marketplace” refers to FFMs, including FFMs where states perform plan management functions and State-based Marketplaces on the Federal Platform (SBM-FPs).
    [Show full text]