DOCSLIB.ORG

Programmatic Environmental Assessment of Field Operations in the Southeast and Gulf of Mexico National Marine Sanctuaries

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Programmatic Environmental Assessment of Field Operations in the Southeast and Gulf of Mexico National Marine Sanctuaries Programmatic Environmental Assessment of Field Operations in the Southeast and Gulf of Mexico National Marine Sanctuaries August 7, 2018 http://sanctuaries.noaa.gov National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration U.S. Secretary of Commerce Wilbur Ross Under Secretary of Commerce for Oceans and Atmosphere and NOAA Administrator RDML Tim Gallaudet, Ph.D., USN Ret. (acting) Assistant Administrator for Ocean Services and Coastal Zone Management, National Ocean Service Russell Callender, Ph.D. Office of National Marine Sanctuaries John Armor, Director Rebecca Holyoke, Deputy Director Matt Brookhart, Acting Southeast Atlantic, Gulf of Mexico and Caribbean Regional Director Cover Photo Diver with sponges and gorgonians. Gray’s Reef is home to a variety of vibrant invertebrates. Photo: NOAA Gray’s Reef National Marine Sanctuary. Table of Contents Acknowledgments ........................................................................................ iii Introduction .................................................................................................. iv 1.0 Purpose and Need ....................................................................................1 1.1 Purpose for the Action ............................................................................... 1 1.2 Need for the Action ..................................................................................... 1 2.0 Description of Proposed Action and Alternatives ................................2 2.1 Alternatives Considered but Not Analyzed in Further Detail .................. 3 2.2 Alternative 1: No Action/ Status Quo ........................................................ 3 2.2.1 Field Operations at Gray’s Reef NMS ............................................................................. 5 2.2.2 Field Operations at Florida Keys NMS ......................................................................... 14 2.2.3 Field Operations at Flower Garden Banks NMS ......................................................... 28 2.3 Alternative 2: Status Quo without Voluntary and Precautionary Procedures ...................................................................................................... 40 2.3.1 Gray’s Reef National Marine Sanctuary ....................................................................... 40 2.3.2 Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary ..................................................................... 40 2.3.3 Flower Garden Banks National Marine Sanctuary ...................................................... 41 3.0 Affected Environment .......................................................................... 42 3.1 Gray’s Reef National Marine Sanctuary .................................................. 43 3.1.1 Physical Environment .................................................................................................... 43 3.1.2 Biological Environment ................................................................................................. 44 3.1.3 Socioeconomic Environment ........................................................................................ 48 3.1.4 Maritime Heritage and Cultural Environment .............................................................. 49 3.2 Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary ................................................ 49 3.2.1 Physical Environment .................................................................................................... 49 3.2.2 Biological Environment ................................................................................................. 51 3.2.3 Socioeconomic Environment ........................................................................................ 54 3.2.4 Maritime Heritage and Cultural Environment .............................................................. 56 3.3 Flower Garden Banks National Marine Sanctuary ................................. 56 3.3.1 Physical Environment .................................................................................................... 56 3.3.2 Biological Environment ................................................................................................. 58 3.3.3 Socioeconomic Environment ........................................................................................ 60 3.3.4 Maritime Heritage and Cultural Environment .............................................................. 61 4.0 Environmental Consequences .............................................................. 62 4.1 Alternative 1 .............................................................................................. 63 4.1.1 Physical Environment .................................................................................................... 63 i 4.1.2 Biological Environment ................................................................................................. 74 4.1.3 Socioeconomic Resources ......................................................................................... 104 4.1.4 Maritime Heritage and Cultural Resources ................................................................ 111 4.2 Alternative 2 ............................................................................................ 118 4.2.1 Biological Environment ............................................................................................... 118 4.3 Cumulative Impacts ................................................................................ 119 4.3.1 Cumulative Effects on Physical Environment ........................................................... 119 4.3.2 Cumulative Effects on Biological Environment ........................................................ 120 4.3.3 Cumulative Effects on Socioeconomic Environment ............................................... 121 4.3.4 Cumulative Effects on Maritime Heritage and Cultural Environment ..................... 122 4.4 Conclusions ............................................................................................ 122 5.0 Consultations ....................................................................................... 129 5.1 Magnuson-Stevens Act .......................................................................... 129 5.1.1 Essential Fish Habitat Assessment ............................................................................ 130 5.2 Marine Mammal Protection Act ............................................................. 135 5.3 Endangered Species Act ........................................................................ 136 5.4 National Historic Preservation Act ........................................................ 138 5.5 Executive Order 12989, Environmental Justice ................................... 140 5.6 Executive Order 13158, Marine Protected Areas ................................. 140 5.7 Coastal Zone Management Act .............................................................. 140 6.0 References ............................................................................................ 142 Appendix A: Protected Species Lists ...................................................... 147 Appendix B: ONMS Vessels in the Southeast and Gulf of Mexico Region ..................................................................................................................... 155 Appendix C: Marine Mammals and Hearing Ranges in All SEGOM Sanctuaries ................................................................................................ 157 Appendix D: Consultation Letters .......................................................... 159 Appendix E: ONMS BMPs for Vessel Operations ................................ 160 ii Acknowledgements We would like to thank the following members of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Office of National Marine Sanctuaries for preparing this document: Sarah Fangman, Gray’s Reef National Marine Sanctuary, ONMS Emma Hickerson, Flower Garden Banks National Marine Sanctuary, ONMS Sarah Kinsfather, Planning and Policy Division, Headquarters, ONMS Lauri McLaughlin, Southeast, Gulf of Mexico and Caribbean region, ONMS Matt Nichols, Planning and Policy Division, Headquarters, ONMS Helene Scalliet, Planning and Policy Division, Headquarters, ONMS Jen Lechuga, Planning and Policy Division, Headquarters, ONMS Becky Shortland, Gray’s Reef National Marine Sanctuary, ONMS George Sedberry, Southeast, Gulf of Mexico and Caribbean region, ONMS Vicki Wedell, Planning and Policy Division, Headquarters, ONMS iii Introduction The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s (NOAA) Office of National Marine Sanctuaries (ONMS) serves as the trustee for the thirteen national marine sanctuaries and two marine national monuments (Figure 1). Together these protected areas encompass more than 600,000 square miles of ocean and Great Lakes waters from Washington State to the Florida Keys, and from New England to American Samoa. National marine sanctuaries are special areas set aside for long-term protection, conservation and management, and are part of our nation’s legacy to future generations. They contain deep ocean habitats of resplendent marine life, kelp forests, coral reefs, whale migration corridors, deep-sea canyons, historically significant shipwrecks, and other underwater archaeological sites. Each sanctuary is a unique place worthy of special protection. Because they serve as natural classrooms, cherished recreational spots and places for valuable commercial activities, national marine sanctuaries represent many things to many people. Organizationally,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • SEPTEMBER 6, 2021 Delmarracing.Com
    21DLM002_SummerProgramCover_ Trim_4.125x8.625__Bleed_4.375x8.875 HOME OF THE 2021 BREEDERS’ CUP JULY 16 - SEPTEMBER 6, 2021 DelMarRacing.com 21DLM002_Summer Program Cover.indd 1 6/10/21 2:00 PM DEL MAR THOROUGHBRED CLUB Racing 31 Days • July 16 - September 6, 2021 Day 8 • Friday July 30, 2021 First Post 4:00 p.m. These are the moments that make history. Where the Turf Meets the Surf Keeneland sales graduates have won Del Mar racetrack opened its doors (and its betting six editions of the Pacific Classic over windows) on July 3, 1937. Since then it’s become West the last decade. Coast racing’s summer destination where avid fans and newcomers to the sport enjoy the beauty and excitement of Thoroughbred racing in a gorgeous seaside setting. CHANGES AND RESULTS Courtesy of Equibase Del Mar Changes, live odds, results and race replays at your ngertips. Dmtc.com/app for iPhone or Android or visit dmtc.com NOTICE TO CUSTOMERS Federal law requires that customers for certain transactions be identi ed by name, address, government-issued identi cation and other relevant information. Therefore, customers may be asked to provide information and identi cation to comply with the law. www.msb.gov PROGRAM ERRORS Every effort is made to avoid mistakes in the of cial program, but Del Mar Thoroughbred Club assumes no liability to anyone for Beholder errors that may occur. 2016 Pacific CHECK YOUR TICKET AND MONIES BEFORE Classic S. (G1) CONFIRMING WAGER. MANAGEMENT ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBLITY FOR TRANSACTIONS NOT COMPLETED WHEN WAGERING CLOSES. POST TIMES Post times for today’s on-track and imported races appear on the following page.
    [Show full text]
  • Politecnico Di Milano Performance and Cost
    POLITECNICO DI MILANO Scuola di Ingegneria Industriale e dell’Informazione Corso di Laurea Magistrale in Ingegneria Energetica Dipartimento di Energia PERFORMANCE AND COST ASSESSMENT OF INTEGRATED SOLAR COMBINED CYCLES USING DIRECT STEAM GENERATION IN LINEAR COLLECTORS Relatore: Prof. Andrea GIOSTRI Co-Relatore: Prof. Marco BINOTTI Tesi di Laurea di: Angela D’Angelo, matricola 817329 Alessandra Ferrara, matricola 816318 Anno Accademico 2014-2015 Summary The incoming sun radiation can be converted in electricity directly with photovoltaic technology, or transferred to a working fluid and then converted into electric energy into a power plant. Costs of solar thermal collectors employed in stand-alone power plants are noticeably higher than more mature technologies one. A suitable alternative to exploit the solar thermal energy is the integration of solar collectors in already existing fossil-fuelled power plants; in this way, the investment cost of the power block is avoided and solar thermal energy is converted at higher efficiency. The present thesis work presents the analysis of several layouts of Integrated Solar Combined Cycle (ISCCs) in terms of nominal and annual performances and costs of the electricity. In the first part of the work, an analysis of the existing integrated plants and the state of the art of the ISCC technology have been presented. Advantages and disadvantages of the integration of solar collectors in different kind of power plants have been pointed out and a literature review of present studies about ISCCs has been made. Several commercial solar collectors have been analysed and a thermal model has been built to estimate the heat losses of collectors receiver.
    [Show full text]
  • Seminar on Hydraulic 3 ·"' ,,- Laboratory·~ Techniq~Es • , R And·
    Seminar on Hydraulic 3 ·"' ,,- Laboratory·~ Techniq~es • , r and·... Instrutnentation ' '\ -(,,: I ,;;;.,-. ..... '\ . ~ . October l r3, ~1980 l,' ~ ".,/ ',. .. : ~ - . ~~ -~ INTRODUCTION Since 1956 Government laboratories have been meeting to exchange ideas on hydraulic laboratory techniques and instrumentation. These meetings have been held at about 2-year intervals. This seminar was the eleventh of the series and represented a radical departure from the traditional participants. For the first time, university and private laboratories were invited to attend. This outside participation added additional spice to the meetings. To maximize the exchange of information, participation was limited by invitation to the major laboratories in the United States. A strong emphasis was placed upon discussions of what did not work as well as what was successful. In addition to the scheduled talks, an impromptu session was held to discuss "who knows about ?" One of the highlights of the seminar was a panel discussion following the banquet concerning the management of research from the Government, private industry, and university viewpoints. Surprisingly, there were far more similarities than differences between the three types of laboratories. The format of this report is an overall summary of each session, comments on each paper, followed by the papers. It was felt that this format promoted the greatest amount of candid response from the participants. Seminar Agenda Organizing Committee Danny L. King E. J. Carlson Henry T. Falvey Thomas J. Rhone Session
    [Show full text]
  • IMCA D022 the Diving Supervisor's Manual
    AB The International Marine Contractors Association The Diving Supervisor’s Manual IMCA D 022 www.imca-int.com May 2000, incorporating the May 2002 erratum AB The International Marine Contractors Association (IMCA) is the international trade association representing offshore, marine and underwater engineering companies. IMCA promotes improvements in quality, health, safety, environmental and technical standards through the publication of information notes, codes of practice and by other appropriate means. Members are self-regulating through the adoption of IMCA guidelines as appropriate. They commit to act as responsible members by following relevant guidelines and being willing to be audited against compliance with them by their clients. There are two core committees that relate to all members: Safety, Environment & Legislation Training, Certification & Personnel Competence The Association is organised through four distinct divisions, each covering a specific area of members’ interests: Diving, Marine, Offshore Survey, Remote Systems & ROV. There are also four regional sections which facilitate work on issues affecting members in their local geographic area – Americas Deepwater, Asia-Pacific, Europe & Africa and Middle East & India. IMCA D 022 The Diving Supervisor’s Manual was produced for IMCA, under the direction of its Diving Division Management Committee, by Paul Williams. www.imca-int.com/diving The information contained herein is given for guidance only and endeavours to reflect best industry practice. For the avoidance of doubt no legal liability shall attach to any guidance and/or recommendation and/or statement herein contained. The Diving Supervisor’s Manual First edition, 2000 Published by The International Marine Contractors Association Carlyle House, 235 Vauxhall Bridge Road, London SW1V 1EJ, UK www.imca-int.com © IMCA 2000 ISBN: 1-903513-00-6 The Diving Supervisor’s Manual Chapter 1 - Introduction.........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Brownie's THIRD LUNG
    BrMARINEownie GROUP’s Owner’s Manual Variable Speed Hand Carry Hookah Diving System ADVENTURE IS ALWAYS ON THE LINE! VSHCDC Systems This manual is also available online 3001 NW 25th Avenue, Pompano Beach, FL 33069 USA Ph +1.954.462.5570 Fx +1.954.462.6115 www.BrowniesMarineGroup.com CONGRATULATIONS ON YOUR PURCHASE OF A BROWNIE’S SYSTEM You now have in your possession the finest, most reliable, surface supplied breathing air system available. The operation is designed with your safety and convenience in mind, and by carefully reading this brief manual you can be assured of many hours of trouble-free enjoyment. READ ALL SAFETY RULES AND OPERATING INSTRUCTIONS CONTAINED IN THIS MANUAL AND FOLLOW THEM WITH EACH USE OF THIS PRODUCT. MANUAL SAFETY NOTICES Important instructions concerning the endangerment of personnel, technical safety or operator safety will be specially emphasized in this manual by placing the information in the following types of safety notices. DANGER DANGER INDICATES AN IMMINENTLY HAZARDOUS SITUATION WHICH, IF NOT AVOIDED, WILL RESULT IN DEATH OR SERIOUS INJURY. THIS IS LIMITED TO THE MOST EXTREME SITUATIONS. WARNING WARNING INDICATES A POTENTIALLY HAZARDOUS SITUATION WHICH, IF NOT AVOIDED, COULD RESULT IN DEATH OR INJURY. CAUTION CAUTION INDICATES A POTENTIALLY HAZARDOUS SITUATION WHICH, IF NOT AVOIDED, MAY RESULT IN MINOR OR MODERATE INJURY. IT MAY ALSO BE USED TO ALERT AGAINST UNSAFE PRACTICES. NOTE NOTE ADVISE OF TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS THAT REQUIRE PARTICULAR ATTENTION BY THE OPERATOR OR THE MAINTENANCE TECHNICIAN FOR PROPER MAINTENANCE AND UTILIZATION OF THE EQUIPMENT. REGISTER YOUR PRODUCT ONLINE Go to www.BrowniesMarineGroup.com to register your product.
    [Show full text]
  • California State University, Northridge an Ecological
    CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, NORTHRIDGE AN ECOLOGICAL AND PHYSIOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT OF TROPICAL CORAL REEF RESPONSES TO PAST AND PROJECTED DISTURBANCES A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Biology By Elizabeth Ann Lenz May 2014 The thesis of Elizabeth A. Lenz is approved by: Robert C. Carpenter, Ph.D. Date: Eric D. Sanford, Ph.D. Date: Mark A. Steele, Ph.D. Date: Peter J. Edmunds, Ph.D., Chair Date: California State University, Northridge ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank Dr. Peter J. Edmunds first and foremost for being my fearless leader and advisor - for the incredible opportunities and invaluable mentorship he has provided to me as a graduate student in the Polyp Lab. I am ever so grateful for his guidance, endless caffeinated energy, constructive critiques, and dry British humor. I would also like to thank my loyal committee members Drs. Robert Carpenter and Mark Steele at CSUN for their availability and expert advise during this process. Their suggestions have greatly contributed to my thesis. I would not only like to acknowledge Dr. Eric Sanford from UC Davis for serving on my committee, but thank him for his incessant support throughout my career over the last 7 years. I will always admire his contagious enthusiasm for invertebrates, passion for scientific research, and unlimited knowledge about marine ecology. My research would not have been possible without the technical support and assistance from my colleagues in Moorea, French Polynesia and St. John, USVI. I am grateful to Dr. Lorenzo Bramanti, Dr. Steeve Comeau, Vince Moriarty, Nate Spindel, Emily Rivest, Christopher Wall, Darren Brown, Alexandre Yarid, Nicolas Evensen, Craig Didden, the VIERS staff, and undergraduate assistants: Kristin Privitera-Johnson and Amanda Arnold.
    [Show full text]
  • Plant Healthcare Consultants
    Plant Healthcare Consultants American Society of Consulting Arborist ▪ International Society of Arboriculture Massachusetts Arborist Association ▪ Massachusetts Tree Wardens and Foresters Association TREE INVENTORIES ▪ APPRAISALS ▪ DIAGNOSIS ▪ TREE RISK ASSESSMENTS Site Impact Study - Tree Assessment & Appraisal Beatrice Circle, Belmont, MA 02478 Prepared for: Timothy Fallon 63 Beatrice Circle Belmont, MA 02478 Prepared by: Daniel E. Cathcart Certified Consulting Arborist Plant Healthcare Consultants 76 Stony Brook Rd Westford, MA 01886 July 6, 2020 Carl A. Cathcart ▪ Daniel E. Cathcart Plant Healthcare Consultants, Partnership 76 Stony Brook Rd. Westford, MA. 01886 ▪ Phone (978) 764-6549 ~ (617) 237-7695 [email protected] ▪ [email protected] ▪ www.treeconsultant.com Site Impact Study – Beatrice Circle, Belmont, MA – July 2020 Table of Contents Summary ...................................................................................................................................................................... 3 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................................. 3 Background & History................................................................................................................................................ 3 Assignment .................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • FIU-DOM-01 Revision-1 12/2019 10
    FIU-DOM-01 Revision -1 12/2019 1 11200 SW 8th Street, Miami Florida, 33199 http://www.fiu.edu TABLE of CONTENTS Section 1.00 GENERAL POLICY 6 1.10 Diving Standards 6 1.20 Operational Control 7 1.30 Consequence of Violation of Regulations by divers 9 1.40 Job Safety Analysis 9 1.50 Dive Team Briefing 10 1.60 Record Maintenance 10 Section 2.00 MEDICAL STANDARDS 11 2.10 Medical Requirements 11 2.20 Frequency of Medical Evaluations 11 2.30 Information Provided Examining Physician 11 2.40 Content of Medical Evaluations 11 2.50 Conditions Which May Disqualify Candidates from Diving (Adapted from Bove, 1998) 11 2.60 Laboratory Requirements for Diving Medical Evaluation and Intervals 12 2.70 Physician's Written Report 13 Section 3.00 ENTRY-LEVEL REQUIRMENTS 14 3.10 General Policy 14 Section 4.00 DIVER QUALIFICATION 14 4.10 Prerequisites 14 4.20 Training 15 4.30 FIU Working Diver Qualification 18 4.40 External (Non-FIU Employee) Diver Qualifications 18 4.50 Depth Certifications 22 4.60 Continuation of FIU Working Diver Certification 22 4.70 Revocation of Certification or Designation 23 4.80 Requalification After Revocation of Diving Privileges 23 4.90 Guest Diver 23 Section 5.00 DIVING REGULATIONS FOR SCUBA (OPEN CIRCUIT, COMPRESSED AIR) 24 5.10 Introduction 24 5.20 Pre-Dive Procedures 24 5.30 Diving Procedures 25 5.40 Post-Dive Procedures 30 5.50 Emergency Procedures 30 5.60 Flying After Diving or Ascending to Altitude (Over 1000 feet) 30 5.70 Record Keeping Requirements 30 FIU-DOM-01 Revision-1 12/2019 2 Section 6.00 SCUBA DIVING EQUIPMENT 32
    [Show full text]
  • Seeking Signals in The
    $: t j ! Ij ~ ,l IOJ I ~ , I I I! 1I I 1 " Edited by Elizabeth N. Shor Layout by jo p. griffith June 1997 Published by: Marine Physical Laboratory ofthe Scripps Institution of Oceanography University of California, San Diego We gratefully acknowledge the following for use of their photographs in this publication: Christine Baldwin W. Robert Cherry Defense Nuclear Agency Fritz Goro William S. Hodgkiss Alan C. Jones MPL Photo Archives SIO Archives (UCSD) Eric T. Slater SIO Reference Series 97-5 ii Contents Introduction: How MPL Came To Be Betty Shor 1 Carl Eckart and the Marine Physical Laboratory Leonard Liebermann 6 Close Encounter of the Worst Kind Fred Fisher and Christine Baldwin 9 Early Days of Seismic and Magnetic Programs at MPL Arthur D. Raft 10 Recollections of Work at the Marine Physical Laboratory: A Non-Academic Point of View Dan Gibson 23 Capricorn Expedition, 1952 Alan C. Jones 39 Que Sera Sera R. J. Smith 42 A Beginning in Undersea Research Fred Noel Spiess ....... 46 The Value of MPL to the Navy Charles B. Bishop 51 The Outhouse Fred Fisher ....... 54 Exploring the Gulf of Alaska and Beyond George G. Shor, Jr 55 Chinook Expedition, 1956 Alan C. Jones 59 Operation HARDTACK I W. Robert Cherry 62 DELTIC and DIMUS, Two Siblings Victor C. Anderson 65 MPL and ARTEMIS Victor C. Anderson 71 Early Days of MPL Christine Baldwin 78 There's Always a Way Around the Rules George G. Shor, Jr 82 iii A Saga from Graduate Student to FLIP Fred Fisher 85 Anchoring FLIP in Deep Water Earl Bronson 95 Then There was SLIP Fred Fisher ......
    [Show full text]
  • NSF Safety and Occupational Health Policy
    The National Science Foundation Office of Polar Programs Polar Environment, Safety & Health PESH-POL_2000.10a Effective Date: August 2018 Safety and Occupational Health Policy Review Date: August 2020 Table of Contents 1. Purpose ......................................................................................................... 1 2. Applicability and Compliance ..................................................................... 1 3. References .................................................................................................... 1 4. Objective ....................................................................................................... 1 5. General Safety Policy .................................................................................. 1 5.1. Responsibilities of Personnel ..................................................................... 2 5.2. Accident prevention ..................................................................................... 2 5.3. Risk Management ......................................................................................... 2 5.4. Suspend Operations .................................................................................... 3 6. Procedures ................................................................................................... 3 6.1. Reviews ......................................................................................................... 3 6.2. Occupational Safety and Health (OSH) Act Standards ............................. 3 6.3.
    [Show full text]
  • An Environmental Assessment of the John Pennekamp Coral Reef State Park and the Key Largo Coral Reef Marine Sanctuary (Unpublished 1983 Report)
    An environmental assessment of the John Pennekamp Coral Reef State Park and the Key Largo Coral Reef Marine Sanctuary (Unpublished 1983 Report) Item Type monograph Authors Voss, Gilbert L.; Voss, Nancy A.; Cantillo, Andriana Y.; Bello, Maria J. Publisher NOAA/National Ocean Service/National Centers for Coastal Ocean Science Download date 07/10/2021 01:47:07 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/1834/19992 NOAA/University of Miami Joint Publication NOAA Technical Memorandum NOS NCCOS CCMA 161 NOAA LISD Current References 2002-6 University of Miami RSMAS TR 2002-03 Coastal and Estuarine Data Archaeology and Rescue Program AN ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT OF THE JOHN PENNEKAMP CORAL REEF STATE PARK AND THE KEY LARGO CORAL REEF MARINE SANCTUARY (Unpublished 1983 Report) November 2002 US Department of Commerce University of Miami National Oceanic and Atmospheric Rosenstiel School of Marine and Administration Atmospheric Science Silver Spring, MD Miami, FL a NOAA/University of Miami Joint Publication NOAA Technical Memorandum NOS NCCOS CCMA 161 NOAA LISD Current References 2002-6 University of Miami RSMAS TR 2002-03 AN ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT OF THE JOHN PENNEKAMP CORAL REEF STATE PARK AND THE KEY LARGO CORAL REEF MARINE SANCTUARY (Unpublished 1983 Report) Gilbert L. Voss Rosenstiel School of Marine and Atmospheric Science University of Miami Nancy A. Voss Rosenstiel School of Marine and Atmospheric Science University of Miami Adriana Y. Cantillo NOAA National Ocean Service Maria J. Bello NOAA Miami Regional Library (Editors, 2002) November 2002 United States National Oceanic and Department of Commerce Atmospheric Administration National Ocean Service Donald L. Evans Conrad C. Lautenbacher, Jr.
    [Show full text]
  • Commonwealth Marine Reserves Review
    Chapter 3 Assessments of new scientific information to support Commonwealth marine reserve zoning and management decisions The Expert Scientific Panel (ESP) terms of reference included providing advice on options for zoning and allowed uses consistent with the Goals and principles for the establishment of the National Representative System of Marine Protected Areas in Commonwealth waters (the Goals and Principles). Noting the extensive scientific process that underpinned the design of the Commonwealth marine reserves (CMRs) proclaimed in 2012, as outlined in chapter 2, and mindful of work of the Bioregional Advisory Panel (BAP) to identify possible new zoning boundaries for the CMR estate, the ESP focused its work on this term of reference on new science directly relevant to the needs of the BAP. The BAP referred a number of matters to the ESP for advice. These matters related to areas of contention identified through the BAP consultation process. They are listed in table 3.1 and are addressed in this chapter. The associated findings were communicated to the BAP for consideration in formulating recommendations on zoning options. Broadly, these matters related to: • concerns about the applicability of Fishing Gear Risk Assessment (FGRA) findings to certain gear types in certain areas of the CMR estate (section 3.1) • concerns about the impact of recreational fishing (section 3.2) • concerns about the effectiveness of different zone types (section 3.3) • the need to have up-to-date scientific information for particular marine features and particular CMRs (sections 3.4 and 3.5). Table 3.1 Issues referred by the Bioregional Advisory Panel to the Expert Scientific Panel for advice Advice request CMR and/or network to Relevant which the request related section of ESP report Evaluate the process used to determine fishing gear risk for Estate-wide 2.3.5 CMRs.
    [Show full text]