Save Our Saugeen Shores, Inc. (Sos)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Save Our Saugeen Shores, Inc. (Sos) Deep Geologic Repository Joint Review Panel Commission d’examen conjoint du projet de stockage dans des couches géologiques profondes PMD 13-P1.130 File / dossier : 8.01.07 Date: 2013-08-13 Edocs: 4185365 Oral intervention from Intervention orale par Save Our Saugeen Shores Inc. Save Our Saugeen Shores Inc. In the Matter of À l’égard de Ontario Power Generation Inc. Ontario Power Generation Inc. Proposed Environmental Impact Statement Étude proposée pour l’énoncé des incidences for OPG’s Deep Geological Repository environnementales pour l’Installation de (DGR) Project for Low and Intermediate stockage de déchets radioactifs à faible et Level Waste moyenne activité dans des couches géologiques profondes Joint Review Panel Commission d’examen conjoint September 16 to October 12, 2013 16 septembre au 12 octobre 2013 WRITTEN SUBMISSION SAVE OUR SAUGEEN SHORES, INC. (SOS) In the Matter of Ontario Power Generation Inc. Proposed Environmental Impact Statement For OPG’s Deep Geological Repository (DGR) Project for Low and Intermediate Level Waste (L&ILW) Kincardine, Ontario To the Joint Review Panel September / October, 2013 Presented by Jill Taylor, President, Save Our Saugeen Shores, Inc. 1 Table of Contents 1. Why Are We Speaking Out? 2. Who Is Save Our Saugeen Shores, Inc. (SOS?) 3. OPG Environmental Impact Statement: A Plan with an Unacceptable Level of Risk 3.1 The Environmental Impact Statement Says: likely no significant risks 3.2 Conflicting Information 3.3 Understatement of Risk 4. Scientific, Social and Economic Concerns 4.1Why a DGR? 4.2 Cumulative Effects of One Aspect of Risk on Another in Time and Space 4.3 Cumulative Effects Assessment Table 10.4-1 and Analysis 4.4 Non-radiological Malfunctions and Accidents 4.5 A Science the Explains the Past But Cannot Predict the Future: Concerns about Geology and Safety 4.6 About $1-Billion 4.7 Residual and Adverse Effects of the DGR 4.8 What Beneficial Effects? 5. A Flawed Process of Consultation and Communication 5.1 Ethical Questions 5.2 Conflicts of Interest 5.3 One Community Choosing for All 5.4 Accepting Hosting Agreement Payouts: Infinite Obligation 5.5 Employment and Long-term Benefits Offered 5.6 The Fox in Charge of the Hen House 6. Misrepresentation of Information 6.1 What’s in a Name? 6.2 How is Radioactive Waste Classified? 6.3 How Less Than Candid Disclosure in Education Materials 6.4 Use of On-Side ‘Experts’ 7. Community Input 7.1 EIS and OPG Requirements 7.2 The Timeline 7.3 Public Attitude Analysis 2003, Intelliplus Ltd.: 7.4 Open Houses June 2003 7.5 Open Houses June 2007-10 7.6 Public Attitude Research (PAR) 2009 and the Socio-economic TSD Save Our Saugeen Shores, Inc. (SOS) 8. Lack of Informed Consent and Failure of Democracy 8.1 Poll to Test Willingness Left to Kincardine 8.2 The Telephone Poll of February 2005: not a Referendum or Vote 8.3 The Question that was Asked 8.4 Poll Results 8.5 Peer Review of Poll Results 9. Purchase of Support in Saugeen Shores and Adjacent Municipalities 9.1 Striking Deals 9.2 Was There an Official Agreement? 9.3 Presentations by OPG to Saugeen Shores Council, 2004 9.4 Was There an Official Agreement? 9.5 The Offer 10. How Well Informed Were People? 11. Continued Support by the Mayor of Saugeen Shores in 2012 11.1 Letter of Support June 26, 2012 11.2 SOS Deputation to Council June 25, 2012 11.3 Other Letters of Support as Unrepresentative CONCLUSION ENDNOTES APPENDICES 3 1.0 WHY ARE WE SPEAKING OUT? My name is Jill Taylor, and I represent Save Our Saugeen Shores, Inc. (SOS). We, the members of SOS, are here to object strenuously to the construction of a deep geological repository (DGR) at the Western Waste Management Facility (WWMF) for the disposal of radioactive nuclear waste. Through our own research and through reading of material prepared by or on behalf of Ontario Power Generation (OPG), we have apprised ourselves of the proposal before the Joint Review Panel for the Deep Geological Repository (in this report, DGR 1) for low and intermediate level waste (L&ILW). Save Our Saugeen Shores, Inc., is a grass-roots organization established in February, 2012, after residents of Saugeen Shores learned of their municipality’s plan to enter into the Nuclear Waste Management Organization’s (NWMO) process to find a site for all of Canada’s current and future used nuclear fuel. Since that time, the Town of Saugeen Shores has advanced to Stage 3 of the site-selection process for a DGR for the high level waste (HLW) — which we will refer to in this report as DGR 2 — along with 21 other towns, 6 of which are located in Bruce County. Shortly after we organized, in spite of alleged widely publicized communication and polling, many residents of Saugeen Shores learned for the first time of OPG’s plan to site DGR 1 (L&ILW) next to the Western Waste Management Facility (WWMF). The WWMF, located on the Bruce Nuclear Generating Station near Tiverton, Ont., is less than one kilometre from the shore of Lake Huron on which we reside, and only 12 kilometres from the boundary of our town. Our town is so close to the proposed DGR 1, that the Guidelines for the Preparation of OPG’s Environmental Impact Statement (EIS), under 5.1 Setting, even require the EIS to concisely describe the proximity of the DGR not only to Kincardine, but to the Town of Saugeen Shores. SOS believes siting a DGR for L&ILW in Kincardine is a dangerous and deeply flawed project. The burial plan for the waste raises on-going safety, health, environmental and socio-economic concerns. In addition, in our opinion, the educational and political process has also been fraught with conflicts of interest, misrepresentation and non- disclosure, as well as lack of democratic due process in the DGR planning. The disposal of ILW, some of which has the potential radioactive hazards of nuclear fuel waste and for comparable periods of time1, requires the same standards of technical safety, ethical awareness and social responsiveness as in planning for high-level radioactive waste disposal. Our research indicates that some of the L&ILW to be stored in the DGR is as highly radioactive and long-lasting as the isotopes from the irradiated Save Our Saugeen Shores, Inc. (SOS) nuclear fuel that has been discussed as being disposed of in the DGR 2. We are here to address the JRP from a neighbouring town because the municipal boundary of the Town of Kincardine does not constitute a physical barrier that could protect our town and Lake Huron itself from the risk of a negative impact. Because we are on the shore of the same body of water, because we share groundwater and air, because we share roads, local food and drinking water, we are integrally connected. Because the DGR construction may cause a threat to our safety and security, and negatively affect the value of our properties, and for a multitude of other reasons, we are here today. Up until now, we have been excluded from the process of community consultation. Despite public statements made by our mayors since 2004, and by OPG, there is no demonstrated willingness or support of the DGR 1 by Saugeen Shores residents. We were not, as promised to OPG by then-mayor Mark Kraemer, contacted by our municipality at any time to inform us about the DGR 1. Nor were we contacted by the municipality to inform us of Council’s support for the DGR 1 in Kincardine. None of our core membership has ever been polled, contacted or formally consulted during the process conducted by consultants assigned to reach out to municipalities adjacent to the Town of Kincardine. There is NO indication that 40% of the residents of Saugeen Shores endorsed the long term management plans proposed by OPG in the form of a DGR as is asserted by the EIS Volume 1. It is a major oversight that the municipality of Saugeen Shores did not seek to clearly and comprehensively inform all citizens of this very important plan for storage of radioactive waste. Further, to maintain that we were in support of the plan is simply untrue. If community consent is considered a pillar of the acceptability of the project for its proposed setting, consent has not been achieved. Everything that we cherish and wish to extend as a legacy to our children has to do with the protection of our Great Lakes heritage and environment. We have been taught since childhood, and continue to believe and to work toward a goal that all Ontarians are expected to embrace, to be good stewards of Lake Huron, the land and its setting. We expect no less of industry, our leaders and our neighbours. 2.0 WHO IS SAVE OUR SAUGEEN SHORES, INC. (SOS)? The mission of SOS is to provide public education and raise awareness about the health, environmental, and socio-economic risks of radioactive waste and prevent its deep burial in Saugeen Shores, its neighbouring regions and the Great Lakes Basin. We took on this task after observing that our municipal council, rather than providing a range of educational materials about this issue, chose to display almost uniformly pro- DGR 2 information on its website and in NWMO-sponsored kiosks at the municipal 5 offices. SOS maintains there should not be DGRs for any nuclear waste anywhere in the Great Lakes Basin, due to the potential for radioactive contamination of this precious resource — the drinking water of 40 million people — and the potential for other adverse environmental, social, health and economic impacts from a DGR.
Recommended publications
  • July 2019 Newsletter 2.Indd
    56 Lindsay Road 5 BY-LAW ENFORCEMENT FIRST NATIONS Lion’s Head, Ontario NBP’s By-law Enforcement Officer is available to LAND CLAIM UPDATE MUNICIPALITY OF N0H 1W0 address your concerns regarding noise, animal Recent articles and news stories advise that control, signage, property standards, zoning, preliminary court proceedings have commenced NORTHERN BRUCE parking, etc. Please write or call the By-law for the First Nations Land Claim. The Nawash and PENINSULA July 2019 Enforcement Officer at (519) 793-3522, X235 or by- Saugeen First Nations, who identify themselves Newsletter [email protected]. We handle complaints in collectively as the Saugeen Ojibway Nation (SON), MUNICIPALITY OF Telephone 519-793-3522 • Fax 519-793-3823 a confidential manner unless, of course, disclosure claim rights to territory which includes lands in the NORTHERN BRUCE PENINSULA Website: www.northbrucepeninsula.ca becomes necessary, then the informant may be Bruce Peninsula (being original unopened road required as a witness in court. allowances and unopened shore allowances) and much of the waters of Georgian Bay and Lake WHEN DO I NEED AN APPOINTMENT Huron. SHORT TERM ACCOMMODATIONS STUDY WITH THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT? The Municipality of Northern Bruce Peninsula is undertaking a study to examine The Chief Building Official (CBO), Wendy Elliott, As part of the claim, SON is seeking the return of Short Term Accommodations (STA’s) and consideration of policy development. will only be accepting appointments on Monday, the Bruce Peninsula lands still owned by Canada Tuesday and Wednesday mornings and Thursday and/or Ontario. The claim does NOT include Skelton Brumwell and Associates have been retained as project lead.
    [Show full text]
  • Situation Report #258: COVID-19 Grey Bruce Health Unit | Incident Management System Nov
    Situation Report #258: COVID-19 Grey Bruce Health Unit | Incident Management System Nov. 30, 2020 Current Situation: Ontario Public Health Classification Level Yellow Stay Calm, Stay Kind, Stay Well Follow the 3 Ws – Washing hands frequently, Watching distance (ideally 6ft), and Wear face covering correctly, and the 2 As - Avoid Crowds and Arrange for outdoor activities instead of indoors whenever possible Testing and case counts reported as of 15:30 hrs, Nov. 30, 2020: 9 new case(s) reported in past 24 hours in Grey Bruce; Kincardine - 3, Arran-Elderslie - 2, Hanover – 1, Grey Highlands – 1, Southgate – 1, West Grey – 1 336 confirmed cases to date (current cumulative total) 50 active case(s) 7 – Active Probable Cases o Probable cases are not lab confirmed, but high-risk contacts of an active case, and also symptomatic 216 High Risk Contacts associated with active cases. 272 recovered cases; 15 cases referred to other health units 0 confirmed case(s) currently hospitalized in Grey Bruce 0 death(s) 37 cases reported in Health Care Workers working in Grey Bruce Active Outbreaks: 1 Facility(ies) in COVID-19 outbreak. Reported in Long-Term Care/Retirement Homes o Golden Dawn Senior Citizen Home (Long-Term Care) 0 Facility(ies) in COVID-19 outbreak. Reported in Schools 0 Facility(ies) in COVID-19 outbreak. Reported in Childcare Centres Actions Taken In the Past 24 Hours: Public Health has been actively engaged to support schools with ongoing updates and consultation meetings with local Boards and officials from all schools in Grey and Bruce GBHU COVID-19 Team continue with case and contact management, reporting, and responding to COVID-19 related calls.
    [Show full text]
  • Phase 1 Geoscientific Desktop Preliminary Assessment of Potential
    Phase 1 Geoscientific Desktop Preliminary Assessment of Potential Suitability for Siting a Deep Geological Repository for Canada’s Used Nuclear Fuel MUNICIPALITIES OF ARRAN-ELDERSLIE, BROCKTON AND SOUTH BRUCE, TOWNSHIP OF HURON-KINLOSS AND TOWN OF SAUGEEN SHORES, ONTARIO APM-REP-06144-0108 JUNE 2014 This report has been prepared under contract to the NWMO. The report has been reviewed by the NWMO, but the views and conclusions are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of the NWMO. All copyright and intellectual property rights belong to the NWMO. For more information, please contact: Nuclear Waste Management Organization 22 St. Clair Avenue East, Sixth Floor Toronto, Ontario M4T 2S3 Canada Tel 416.934.9814 Toll Free 1.866.249.6966 Email [email protected] www.nwmo.ca Phase 1 Geoscientific Desktop Preliminary Assessment of Potential Suitability for Siting a Deep Geological Repository for Canada’s Used Nuclear Fuel Municipalities of Arran-Elderslie, Brockton and South Bruce, Township of Huron-Kinloss and Town of Saugeen Shores Revision: 0 (Final) Prepared for: Nuclear Waste Management Organization 22 ST. Clair Avenue East, 6th Floor Toronto, Ontario M4T 2S3 Prepared by: Document ID: Sed Sites_Main Report_ June 30_R0 NWMO Report Number: APM-REP-06144-0108 June 2014 Geoscientific Desktop Suitability Assessment Study Sedimentary Sites, Southern Ontario Final Report Phase 1 Geoscientific Desktop Preliminary Assessment of Potential Suitability for Siting a Deep Geological Repository for Canada’s Used Title: Nuclear Fuel,
    [Show full text]
  • Bruce Peninsula Press
    Highway 26 East KIA OF OWEN SOUND 519-371-4447 across from Montana’s www.kiaowensound.ca 1-800-930-5616 Newsstand Price $1.50 + HST ruceThe eninsula ress B P P Since 1988 DELIVERING LOCAL NEWS TO THE NORTHERN BRUCE PENINSULA FOR 30 YEARS 2021 Number Two February 9 to March 9, 2021 Golden Dawn Residents and Staff Immunized With First Dose Of Covid-19 Vaccine By Joanne Rodgers, Bruce Peninsula Press Nora Foster, a seventy-one year old resident at Golden Dawn Senior Citizen Home in Lion’s Head became the first person to be vaccinated for COVID-19 in Northern Bruce. On 15 January 2021, Grey Bruce Health Unit administered approximately 79 shots of the first dose of the Pfizer BioNtech COVID-19 vaccine to residents, staff and some essential caregivers. (See Media Release from Public Health Grey Bruce page 8). Bert Niehof, an essential caregiver received the vaccine along with his hundred year old mother. He says it was a Photo Credit: Jasmine Brough, Bruce Peninsula Press fairly painless experience for both him and Forty Hills Ranch Llama Trekking in Support of Local Foodbank his mother. He was told to wait 15 minutes after being immunized to ensure he did Photo: The Forty Hills Ranch owners Keith and Mary Fowler with llamas (L-R) Skittles and Jazzy and alpaca Mr. not have an allergic reaction. A day later Gibbs. From February 9th - 23rd Forty Hills Ranch is offering llama trekking with all proceeds going to the Lion’s he reported that he felt a slight soreness Head Food Bank.
    [Show full text]
  • The Town of Saugeen Shores 1 Table of Contents
    20 21 The Town of Saugeen Shores 1 Table of Contents 04 Message from 14 Business & Investment 20 Transportation 26 Community Services the Mayor The Economy Travel Health Care Small Business Long Term Care 06 History Lifestyle Construction 22 Places of Worship Port Elgin Agriculture & Manufacturing Recreation Schools Southampton Tourism Arts, Culture & Heritage Housing 28 In Their Own Words 12 People Nuclear Nuclear Innovation Institute Utilities Ages 30 Contact Us Gender 18 Labour Force Population Major Field of Study Education Labour Force by Industry Labour Force by Occupation 2 3 Message from the Mayor Welcome to Saugeen Shores – to Ontario’s major urban hubs including Toronto, Guelph, advocate for the support of our local economy. to be for any business looking to expand, collaborate and grow. I invite you to come join our community– as Kitchener, Waterloo, Hamilton, London and Barrie. Business owners, young families, remote workers, the fastest growing community in a visitor, a business owner, or as one of the growing As communities across the country battled and and retirees are drawn to our growing and increasingly number of people who are choosing to call Saugeen the region and a hub for innovation continue to battle the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic diverse community– attracted by an unparalleled Shores home. on Canada’s clean energy frontier. Saugeen Shores businesses and community members quality of life and close proximity to major employers, have adapted and changed the way they do business including the world’s largest nuclear generating facility, Bordered in the west by one of the world’s largest and deliver services.
    [Show full text]
  • Census Release IV: Income
    Census Release IV: Income October 6, 2017. For information, contact Shelby Huffman, x1306, or Virginia McFarland, x1522 Contents Data Sources ........................................................................................................................................................................... 1 Key Indicators .......................................................................................................................................................................... 1 Household Income .............................................................................................................................................................. 1 Household Income: Ten-Year Change ............................................................................................................................. 2 Individual Income ................................................................................................................................................................ 3 Individual Income: By Gender ......................................................................................................................................... 3 Employment Income ........................................................................................................................................................... 4 Employment Income: By Gender .................................................................................................................................... 4 Low Income ........................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Census Release II: Population by Age and Sex, Dwelling Characteristics
    Census Release II: Population by Age and Sex, Dwelling Characteristics May 30, 2017. For information, contact Virginia McFarland, x1522 Data Source ............................................................................................................................................................................. 2 Population Age Distribution, Grey Bruce Overview ................................................................................................................ 3 Household and Dwelling Characteristics, Overview ............................................................................................................... 6 Percentage of Dwellings Occupied by Usual Residents ...................................................................................................... 6 Household Size .................................................................................................................................................................... 7 Dwelling Type ...................................................................................................................................................................... 8 Geographic Profiles ................................................................................................................................................................. 9 Ontario ................................................................................................................................................................................ 9 Grey Bruce Health
    [Show full text]
  • 519-396-7006 2845 Sd
    Lake Range Realty Ltd. Brokerage THE THE INDEPENDENTINDEPENDENT CELL 519-668-8006 OFFICE 519-395-3959 Jen Edwards Sales Representative www.lakerangerealty.ca extraextraVOL 5, ISSUE 20 | KINCARDINE, ONTARIO | THURSDAY, MAY 21, 2020 Sunny skies and a gentle breeze made for a picture-perfect walk on the lakeside boardwalk on May 13. (Tammy Schneider photo) WHAT YOU'RE MISSING THISFOR WEEK YOUR SUBSCRIPTION IN TO THE KINCARDINE INDEPENDENT, • Notes from Kincardine Council CALL 519-396-3111 OR EMAIL [email protected] • Brucelea Haven update Only $48 per year anywhere in Canada. Online subscriptions also available. • 211 is a community resource ‘YOUR HOMETOWN CONNECTION’ Lake Range Realty Ltd. Brokerage The Kincardine 519 440-3022 PM40005269 R08067 THE MarleneBroker Gibson THE VOL 44,NDEPENDENT ISSUE 31 www.MarleneGibsonRealEstate.ca I NDEPENDENTNDEPENDENT II KINCARDINE, ONTARIO NOW PLAYING | Wednesday, July 31, 2019 AY, JUNE 27, 2019 MIDNIGHT HOUR The Magic of Motown $1.50 INCLUDING HST JULY 30 - AUG 1 REACH MORE READERS FOR ONE | KINCARDINE, ONTARIO | THURSD 1-877-396-5722 extraVOL 4, ISSUE 26 extra Construction begins on Ask us about special pricing for both publications natural gas distribution LOW PRICE! system Epcor Natural Gas Limited Part nership is constructing a natural gas distribution system that will serve - the communities of Chesley, Paisley, Inverhuron, Tiverton, Kincardine, Lurgan Beach, Point Clark, Ripley, Lucknow and the Bruce Energy Cen tre. The Ontario Energy Board ap - The Kincardine proved Epcor’s Leave to Construct application earlier this month. - The crew from the Fa The distribution system will con Georgian Bay. Story sist of two components: a larger ir Jeanne tied up the riggi diameter mainline that will be the and photo can be found on - ng as the tall ship prepared backbone of the system and transport page 13.
    [Show full text]
  • Beach Stewardship Guide for the Township of Huron-Kinloss
    Beach Stewardship Guide For the Township of Huron-Kinloss Prepared by the Lake Huron Centre for Coastal Conservation 1 Beach Stewardship Guide for Huron-Kinloss © 2007, The Lake Huron Centre for Coastal Conservation ISBN 978-0-9783621-3-3 Recommended Citation: Peach, G.H., 2007. Beach Stewardship Guide for Huron-Kinloss. Prepared by the Lake Huron Centre for Coastal Conservation. Funding for this guide was made possible through Environment Canada’s Habitat Stewardship Program for Species at Risk. This project was done in partnership with the Pitcher’s Thistle- Dune Grasslands Recovery Team, Bruce Resource Stewardship Network, and the Township of Huron-Kinloss. 2 Page 3 Beach Stewardship Guide Beach Stewardship Guide for the Township of Huron-Kinloss Prepared by the Lake Huron Centre for Coastal Conservation Steering Committee: Geoff Peach, Project Coordinator, the Coastal Centre Jim Armstrong, Point Clark Doug Brown, Lurgan-Blair’s Grove Beach Association Carol Enright, Point Clark Mike Fair, Township of Huron-Kinloss Harold Helfenstein, Emmerton Beach Barry McPherson, Bruce Beach Association Don Thorpe, Point Clark Beach Association Mary-Rose Walden, Township of Huron-Kinloss Brian Watt, Boiler Beach John Welwood, Lurgan-Blair’s Grove Beach Association October, 2007 3 4 Table of Contents Executive Summary 7 Introduction 9 Beach and Dune Stewardship 11 Invasive Species 32 Nearshore Water Quality 34 Beach Education and Communication 47 Rules and Regulations 52 Glossary 60 References 63 Appendices 65 Appendix A—Control of Invasive Plants Appendix B—Harvesting Marram Grass Appendix C– Native Dune Plant Identification Guide Appendix D—Beach Code of Conduct Appendix E– Educational Signs 5 6 Page 7 Beach Stewardship Guide Executive Summary This Beach Stewardship Guidefor Huron-Kinloss describes the main issues identifiedby residents and the municipality at a public meeting in August 2006.
    [Show full text]
  • Community Profile
    Community Profile MUNICIPALITY OF BROCKTON, ONTARIO APM-REP-06144-0116 NOVEMBER 2014 This report has been prepared under contract to the NWMO. The report has been reviewed by the NWMO, but the views and conclusions are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of the NWMO. All copyright and intellectual property rights belong to the NWMO. For more information, please contact: Nuclear Waste Management Organization 22 St. Clair Avenue East, Sixth Floor Toronto, Ontario M4T 2S3 Canada Tel 416.934.9814 Toll Free 1.866.249.6966 Email [email protected] www.nwmo.ca Nuclear Waste Management Organization (NWMO) Community Profile: Brockton, Ontario Environment Nuclear Waste Management Organization (NWMO) Community Profile: Brockton, Ontario Prepared by: AECOM 105 Commerce Valley Drive West, Floor 7 905 886 7022 tel Markham, ON, Canada L3T 7W3 905 886 9494 fax www.aecom.com Project Number: 60300337 Date: November, 2014 Nuclear Waste Management Organization (NWMO) Community Profile: Brockton, Ontario Statement of Qualifications and Limitations The attached Report (the “Report”) has been prepared by AECOM Canada Ltd. (“Consultant”) for the benefit of the client (“Client”) in accordance with the agreement between Consultant and Client, including the scope of work detailed therein (the “Agreement”). The information, data, recommendations and conclusions contained in the Report (collectively, the “Information”): is subject to the scope, schedule, and other constraints and limitations in the Agreement and the qualifications contained
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 Status of Waste Management Report Bruce County
    2018 Status of Waste Management Report Bruce County November 2019 Bruce County Transportation & Environmental Services Department ` Table of Contents Executive Summary ....................................................................................... 3 Introduction ................................................................................................ 4 Background ................................................................................................. 4 County Responsibilities ................................................................................ 4 Municipal Responsibilities ............................................................................. 5 Policy Framework ......................................................................................... 5 Current Waste Management System .................................................................... 8 Waste Reduction ........................................................................................ 8 Waste Disposal .......................................................................................... 8 Waste Diversion ........................................................................................ 16 Monitoring ................................................................................................. 22 Waste Management Opportunities ..................................................................... 23 Disposal ................................................................................................. 23 Diversion
    [Show full text]
  • Zoning By-Law Amendment  Local Official Plan  County Plan Amendment Amendment
    File Number: Planning and Development Department Date Received: Form One Property and Applicant Information Please Note that the Planning Act requires that a complete application be filed before it can be considered. You need to complete this form as well as the Additional Requirements for the specific application you are making. Please look at the Information For Applicants sheet for your type of application. General Information You are encouraged to discuss your application with the Planner for your municipality, and with the appropriate officials of the local municipality. You may also contact your local Planner by way of the County of Bruce website (www.brucecounty.on.ca) ‘Living Here’, ‘Housing and Property’ ‘Land Use Planning’, then select your municipality. At this point you will be provided with contact information for the planning hub and staff. Staff can provide you with information about your application. To avoid delay in processing, you should gather information about your property, and examine the provisions of Official Plans and Zoning By-Laws in force and effect. Incomplete Applications May Be Refused The Planning Act requires that complete applications be filed before the application(s) may be considered. The requirements for a complete application are defined in the Planning Act, its regulations, the Bruce County Official Plan and in Local Municipal Official Plans. Applications may be refused when incomplete. A complete application consists of Form 1 (Property and Applicant Information) completed and signed; a scalable and detailed site plan (examples of which are attached to the specific application guides), two (2) paper copies and one (1) electronic copy (Word or PDF) of supplementary documents including reports, studies, maps and schedules as required, together with the associated development application fees (see Table of Fees at end of Form One).
    [Show full text]