Tippah County Mineral Resources

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Tippah County Mineral Resources MISSISSIPPI STATE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WILLIAM CLIFFORD MORSE, Ph. D. Director BULLETIN 42 TIPPAH COUNTY MINERAL RESOURCES GEOLOGY By LOUIS COWLES CONANT, Ph.D. TESTS By THOMAS EDWIN McCUTCHEON, B. S., Ccr. Engr. UNIVERSITY, MISSISSIPPI 1941 Please do not destroy this report; rather return it to the Mississippi Geological Survey, University, Mississippi, and receive postage refund. MISSISSIPPI STATE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WILLIAM CLIFFORD MORSE, Ph. D. DIRECTOR BULLETIN 42 TIPPAH COUNTY MINERAL RESOURCES GEOLOGY By LOUIS COWLES CONANT, Ph. D. TESTS By THOMAS EDWIN McCUTCHEON, B. S., Cer. Engr. Prepared in cooperation with the Tippah citizens and the VVPA as a report on O.P.465-63-3-275 UNIVERSITY, MISSISSIPPI 194* MISSISSIPPI GEOLOGICAL SURVEY COMMISSION His Excellency, Paul Burney Johnson Governor Hon. Joseph Sloan Vandiver State Superintendent of Education Hon. William David McCain Director, Dept. of Archives and History Hon. Alfred Benjamin Butts Chancellor, University of Mississippi Hon. Duke Humphrey .... President, Mississippi State College STAFF William Clifford Morse, Ph.D. Director Calvin S. Brown, D.Sc, Ph.D. Archeologist Louis Cowles Conant, Ph.D. Assistant Geologist Thomas Edwin McCutcheon, B.S. Cer. Engr Ceramic Engineer Laura Cameron, B.A _. Secretary and Librarian Alta Ray Gault, M.S. Technician SUPERVISORS' Franklin Earl Vestal, M.S. ... Assistant Geologist Harlan Richard Bergquist, Ph.D. Assistant Geologist Richard Randall Priddy, Ph.D. Assistant Geologist Malcolm Rogers Livingston. B.S.E., M.S. Chemical Technician Roy Mills _. Potter Technician • Pay Roll of WPA. LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL Office of the State Geological Survey University, Mississippi December 10, 1940 To His Excellency, Governor Paul Burney Johnson, Chairman, and Members of the Geological Commission Gentlemen: Herewith is Bulletin 42, Tippah County Mineral Resources—Geology by Louis Cowles Conant, Ph.D.; Tests by Thomas Edwin McCutcheon, B.S. Cer. Engr.—the fourth in a series of bulletins that the Mississippi Geological Survey as sponsor to WPA project 4847 pledged itself to publish. The report is the fruit of the splendid cooperation on the part of the civic organizations of Ripley, the citizens of that city and of Tippah County with their State Geological Survey. Many citizens have contributed time and substance, for which the State Geologist is profoundly grateful—especially has Mr. Lee Cox, to mention only one of a number, labored for the success of the survey. The survey, of course, would not have been possible without the WPA grant. The report reveals a number of valuable mineral deposits which await only commercial development to yield a substantial income. The tests show that the Porters Creek clay (middle phase) produces a porous material which, on crushing, forms one of the strongest light-weight aggregates for concrete known to the industry—a material not only light in weight but one which has excellent insulating qualities and one which should supply a great need. Very sincerely yours, William Clifford Morse, State Geologist and Director TIPPAH COUNTY MINERAL RESOURCES 5 CONTENTS GEOLOGY Page Introduction 11 Geography ... 12 Communication 12 Population and schools 13 Agriculture 13 Labor 14 Topography 14 Climate 15 Drainage and water resources 16 General geology . 16 Stratigraphy—Mesozoic group . ... 21 Cretaceous system 21 Selma chalk 21 Ripley formation 21 General features .... 21 Transitional gray clay 22 Coon Creek tongue 22 McNairy sand tongue 23 Upper tongue 24 Owl Creek formation 25 Stratigraphy—Cenozoic group . 27 Paleocene system—Midway series 27 Clayton formation .... 27 General features 27 Basal limestone and marl member 29 Upper member 31 Porters Creek clay 33 General features ..... 33 Basal phase . 34 Typical phase . 35 Laminated upper phase 36 Tippah sand member 37 Bauxite-kaolin zone 39 Paleocene-Eocene (Midway-Wilcox) contact ... 41 Eocene system—Wilcox series .... 43 Ackerman formation 43 Basal clays . 43 Basal sand member 44 Upper clay member 45 6 MISSISSIPPI STATE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Page Holly Springs sand -- 46 Post-Eocene deposits . 47 Pliocene or Pleistocene —. 47 Stream terraces _ 47 Pleistocene and Recent 48 Flood plain alluvium 48 Colluvium -... 49 Structural geology _ — 50 Economic geology ._ — 52 Introductory statement _ 52 Ceramic clays _- 52 Introductory statement _ .._ _ 52 H. A. Hopper area _ _. 55 R. O. Patrick property — 57 J. C. McElwain property _ 57 J. S. Pearce property _ 57 E. P. Barber property- 58 Mark Hill region _ ~ 58 D. D. Hill—T. H. Burford properties 59 W. L. Roberson property _ 60 Flat Rock Church district _ 60 J. M. Gunter—Jim Hill properties 62 Bauxite 63 Ocher 64 Porters Creek clay.._ — — - 65 Bentonite _— __ 65 Siderite — ....- 66 Sand — — - 67 Marl _ 68 Phosphate _ -— . 69 Lignite _ _ _ - — 69 Oil and gas _..- ..... 70 Test hole records _... 70 Acknowledgments _ _ 107 References — _ 108 TIPPAH COUNTY MINERAL RESOURCES 7 TESTS Page Introduction _ _. .... Ill Relation between stratigraphy and classification of clays 112 Classification of clays and minerals 116 General 116 Classification 117 Laboratory tests of clays and minerals ... 125 Region A _ 125 Physical properties in the unburned state 126 Screen analyses 127 Chemical analyses 130 Pyro-physical properties 131 Region B ..._ 140 Physical properties in the unburned state 140 Screen analyses _ 141 Chemical analyses _ 142 Pyro-physical properties 143 Region C 145 Physical properties in the unburned state _ 145 Screen analyses _ 146 Chemical analyses 147 Pyro-physical properties 148 Region D _.... 153 Physical properties in the unburned state 153 Pyro-physical properties 154 Region E 157 Physical properties in the unburned state ... 157 Screen analyses ._ _ 158 Chemical analyses .. 162 Pyro-physical properties 163 Region F 167 Physical properties in the unburned state 167 Screen analyses 168 Chemical analyses 170 Pyro-physical properties 171 Region G - _ 176 Physical properties in the unburned state 176 Pyro-physical properties 177 Region H 180 Physical properties in the unburned state 180 Screen analysis 180 Chemical analysis _ 181 Pyro-physical properties 181 Porters Creek clay, upper phase _ ..... 182 Physical properties in the unburned state 182 Pyro-physical properties 182 Porters Creek clay, middle phase 183 Physical properties in the unburned state 183 Screen analyses 183 8 MISSISSIPPI STATE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Page Chemical analyses _ _ 183 Pyro-physical properties — „ 184 Porters Creek clay, lower phase _ 186 Physical properties in the unburned state _ 186 Pyro-physical properties 186 Bauxite _ _ _.. 187 Chemical analyses 187 Marl _ „ _ 188 Screen analyses ._ _. 188 Chemical analysis _ 189 Ocher ..._ „ __ 189 Screen analyses _ ... 189 Sand ._ _.. 190 Screen analyses __ .._. .. 190 Possibilities for utilization 191 Kaolinitic clays „ 191 Pottery clays _ ...__ 193 Brick and tile clays ..._ 195 Highly ferruginous clays __ 196 Clays of composite samples 196 Clays grading into the Porters Creek formation _ . 197 Clays of the Porters Creek formation, upper phase 197 Clays of the Porters Creek formation, middle phase.- 198 Properties _ 198 Possibilities _ _ ..._ _ 200 Clays of the Porters Creek formation, lower phase 201 Bauxite _ _ 202 Marl _ _ 202 Ocher _ 202 Sand „ _. 203 Experimental investigations of the Porters Creek clay, middle phase 203 General ..._ — 203 Rotary drilling mud _ _ 203 Functions and properties of mud fluid used in rotary drilling.... 203 Experimental data _ _ ___. _ 205 Summary and conclusions ___ 211 Burned light-weight aggregate ._ 212 Experimental procedure — 213 Experimental data — —— 214 Summary and conclusions 215 Laboratory procedure _ — 217 Preparation _ _. 217 Forming of test pieces- .... _ 218 Plastic, dry, and working properties 218 Fired properties „ _ _ 218 Chemical analyses 219 Conversion table — — _ 221 Screen analyses _ 222 Acknowledgments ._ _— — 222 Index __ _ 223 TIPPAH COUNTY MINERAL RESOURCES 9 ILLUSTRATIONS GEOLOGY Page Figure 1.—Map showing the location of Tippah County 12 Figure 2.—View across the Flatwoods, looking north from the top of Blue Mountain .15 Figure 3.—Generalized east-west cross section of Tippah County ... 18 Figure 4.—Type locality of the Owl Creek formation 25 Figure 5.—Small scale faulting in the Clayton formation 31 Figure 6.—Fifty-foot bluff of Porters Creek clay on the Kate Davis place 35 Figure 7.—Exposure of Tippah sand in recent culvert excavation 38 Figure 8.—Paleocene-Eocene (Midway-Wilcox) contact in a railroad cut about a quarter of a mile north of Walnut 42 Figure 9.—Interbedded white sandy bauxite and red Wilcox sand 43 Figure 10.—Clay-ball breccia in the basal Ackerman red sand 45 Figure 11.—Tubular and corrugated ferruginous sandstone concretions in red Wilcox sand 46 Figure 12.—Terrace formed about 1865 by the slipping of a portion of a hill of Porters Creek clay 50 Figure 13.—Map of Tippah County showing the places from which sam ples were obtained 54 Figure 14.—Map of the H. A. Hopper area 55 Figure 15.—Map of the area west of Blue Mountain 58 Figure 16.—Highway Department sand pit near north edge of Walnut .... 67 TESTS Figure 17.—Thermal dehydration curves of typical clays . 113 Figure 18.—Thermal dehydration curve of the Porters Creek clay (mid dle phase) 205 Figure 19.—Relation between viscosity and specific gravity of drilling fluid. Porters Creek clay (middle phase) 206 Figure 20—Properties of light-weight Porters Creek clay aggregate con crete 216 Figure 21.—Olsen 50-ton testing machine in the laboratory of the School of Engineering at the University of Mississippi used in deter mining the crushing strength.. 217 Index—Page references to test holes 223 Plate 1.—Geologic map of Tippah County .. Back TIPPAH COUNTY MINERAL RESOURCES GEOLOGY LOUIS COWLES CONANT, Ph.D. INTRODUCTION The field work on which this report is based was conducted from May to September, 1938, under the joint auspices of the Federal Works Progress Administration and the Mississippi Geological Sur vey, as one unit in a state-wide study of the mineral resources of Mississippi.
Recommended publications
  • Press Release, P
    MFA Boston, Museum to Launch First Online Catalogue, Press Release, p. 1 Contact: Karen Frascona 617.369.3442 [email protected] FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE MUSEUM OF FINE ARTS, BOSTON, TO LAUNCH ITS FIRST ONLINE CATALOGUE, PAINTINGS OF THE AMERICAS BOSTON, MA (February 16, 2012)—Just in time for Presidents’ Day, the Museum of Fine Arts, Boston (MFA), will debut on February 20 its first online catalogue, Paintings of the Americas. The free digital publication, available at www.mfa.org/americanpaintings, will feature a selection of more than 400 paintings from its collection of nearly 2,000 (including new acquisitions) created by artists from the 17th through the 20th centuries. The online catalogue was produced to complement the Museum’s Art of the Americas Wing. This is the first publication in a generation to document the MFA’s world-renowned holdings of American paintings, along with those that represent the broader Paintings of the Americas is the MFA’s first online catalogue, which is offered for free at www.mfa.org/americanpaintings spectrum of the Americas. With its elegant design, ease of use, and access to a wide range of information, Paintings of the Americas tells a compelling story through a chronological exploration of diverse works from North, Central, and South America. It also showcases masterworks by John Singleton Copley, Mary Cassatt, John Singer Sargent, Thomas Eakins, Winslow Homer, Georgia O’Keeffe, and Wifredo Lam. Support for this publication was provided by the Mr. and Mrs. Raymond J. Horowitz Foundation for the Arts, the Ann and William Elfers Publication Fund, the Wyeth Foundation for American Art, and the Vance Wall Foundation.
    [Show full text]
  • Contacts: Karen Frascona Amelia Kantrovitz 617.369.3442 617.369.3447 [email protected] [email protected]
    Contacts: Karen Frascona Amelia Kantrovitz 617.369.3442 617.369.3447 [email protected] [email protected] FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE NAGOYA/BOSTON MUSEUM OF FINE ARTS CELEBRATES 15th ANNIVERSARY WITH MILLET, BARBIZON AND FONTAINEBLEAU EXHIBITION BOSTON, MA—In April 2014, Japan’s Nagoya/Boston Museum of Fine Arts (N/BMFA) and the Museum of Fine Arts, Boston (MFA), celebrate the 15th anniversary of America’s first and only sister museum in Asia. Throughout the partnership, which has welcomed more than 4 million visitors to the N/BMFA since 1999, numerous exhibitions have brought Boston’s artistic treasures to Japan. To mark the anniversary, and celebrate the Museum’s historic relationship with Japan, the MFA has organized Millet, Barbizon and Fontainebleau, which is on view in Nagoya April 19–August 31, 2014. A highlight of the exhibition, Jean-François Millet’s masterpiece The Sower (1850), will travel to Japan along with a number of important works from the MFA’s renowned collection of French paintings from the mid-19th century. In Japan, Millet, Barbizon and The Sower, 1850, Fontainebleau also travels to the Museum of Art, Kochi, and the Mitsubishi Ichigokan Jean-François Millet Museum, Tokyo. Additionally, a series of special events and programs in Nagoya surrounding the 15-year anniversary includes a Directors' Dialogue with Dr. Shunkichi Baba, Director of the N/BMFA, and Malcolm Rogers, the MFA’s Ann and Graham Gund Director. This exhibition of 64 paintings displays one of the world’s premier collections of landscape art from 19th-century France, and features artists including Millet, Camille Corot, Narcisse Virgile Diaz de la Penã, Théodore Rousseau and Claude Monet.
    [Show full text]
  • 3.7 CULTURAL RESOURCES 3. 7 .1 Existing Conditions
    3.7 CULTURAL RESOURCES 3. 7 .1 Existing Conditions Information provided within the cultural resource overview of the Salton Sea Anomaly area has been obtained from: record search data (Imperial Valley College Museum and San Diego Museum of Man); survey/excavation reports (Rogers 1966; Mccown 1953-1957; Gallegos 1980); and personal communication (Gallegos 1981). A detailed cultural resource overview is located in Appendix 3. 7 of this report. The liter­ ature search survey encompasses a 111,444 acre (45,119 ha) study region. Moreover, approximately 54 percent of the study area is covered by the Salton Sea. The entire project area contains recorded evidence of historic and prehistoric occupation/land use. At various times in the prehistoric past the study region was covered by a large inter­ mittent body of water referred to as Lake Cahuilla. The anthropological implications of the former lake are outstanding. Lake Cahuilla created a rich environment for fish, shellfish, birds, mammals and man during the past 2000 years. This data as pertains to the Salton Sea Anomaly area is best preserved along the relict 40-foot MSL (12 m) shoreline. The studies of Malcolm Rogers and B.E. Mccowan stand out as being the most interesting for the amount and kinds of materials encountered. Radiocarbon dates identify these areas as post AD 1400. Sites contain .a range of materials, including midden, bone, shell, pottery, lithics, milling tools and charcoal. Rogers reports one resource located within the study area as a four-mile long occupation site. During the J past four decades much has passed to change the character of cultural resources along the relict shoreline; natural agencies, gravel quarries, water conveyances and access roads, plus recreational activities have all disturbed a large share of archaeological sites.
    [Show full text]
  • Propaganda Found in the Museum of Fine Arts, Boston, Massachusetts
    RIVIER ACADEMIC JOURNAL, VOLUME 3, NUMBER 2, FALL 2007 PROPAGANDA FOUND IN THE MUSEUM OF FINE ARTS, BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS Christina Caruso* Undergraduate Student, B.A. in Communications Program, Rivier College In today’s society, propaganda is visible in every direction we turn. It floods the television, Internet and radio. It is disseminated through the government, opinion leaders, and our friends. It is hard to determine the difference between propaganda and persuasion; however, there is a fine line between the two. I pose the question: Is it typical for an art museum to employ propaganda? This could be the case with the Museum of Fine Arts in Boston, Massachusetts. Through a discussion of propaganda and its features, the Boston Museum of Fine Arts will be analyzed to prove if propaganda is present in their architecture and the way it is guided by its current director, Malcolm Rogers. And, even if propagandistic, is the museum sticking to their mission statement which is to “[house] and [preserve] preeminent collections and [aspire] to serve a wide variety of people through direct encounters with works of art” (mfa.org). This paper will discuss what propaganda is, and if the MFA Boston is trying to employ propaganda. The Museum of Fine Arts in Boston, Massachusetts, is one of the largest museums in the United States. The original museum was founded in 1870 and was located in a Gothic Revival building on Copley Square, in the Back Bay neighborhood of Boston. It moved to its current location on Huntington Avenue, in 1909. It is a significantly imposing structure, with its modern, yet Romanesque concrete columns located and facing the colleges, businesses and residences in the surrounding areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Schmitz, M. D. 2000. Appendix 2: Radioisotopic Ages Used In
    Appendix 2 Radioisotopic ages used in GTS2020 M.D. SCHMITZ 1285 1286 Appendix 2 GTS GTS Sample Locality Lat-Long Lithostratigraphy Age 6 2s 6 2s Age Type 2020 2012 (Ma) analytical total ID ID Period Epoch Age Quaternary À not compiled Neogene À not compiled Pliocene Miocene Paleogene Oligocene Chattian Pg36 biotite-rich layer; PAC- Pieve d’Accinelli section, 43 35040.41vN, Scaglia Cinerea Fm, 42.3 m above base of 26.57 0.02 0.04 206Pb/238U B2 northeastern Apennines, Italy 12 29034.16vE section Rupelian Pg35 Pg20 biotite-rich layer; MCA- Monte Cagnero section (Chattian 43 38047.81vN, Scaglia Cinerea Fm, 145.8 m above base 31.41 0.03 0.04 206Pb/238U 145.8, equivalent to GSSP), northeastern Apennines, Italy 12 28003.83vE of section MCA/84-3 Pg34 biotite-rich layer; MCA- Monte Cagnero section (Chattian 43 38047.81vN, Scaglia Cinerea Fm, 142.8 m above base 31.72 0.02 0.04 206Pb/238U 142.8 GSSP), northeastern Apennines, Italy 12 28003.83vE of section Eocene Priabonian Pg33 Pg19 biotite-rich layer; MASS- Massignano (Oligocene GSSP), near 43.5328 N, Scaglia Cinerea Fm, 14.7 m above base of 34.50 0.04 0.05 206Pb/238U 14.7, equivalent to Ancona, northeastern Apennines, 13.6011 E section MAS/86-14.7 Italy Pg32 biotite-rich layer; MASS- Massignano (Oligocene GSSP), near 43.5328 N, Scaglia Cinerea Fm, 12.9 m above base of 34.68 0.04 0.06 206Pb/238U 12.9 Ancona, northeastern Apennines, 13.6011 E section Italy Pg31 Pg18 biotite-rich layer; MASS- Massignano (Oligocene GSSP), near 43.5328 N, Scaglia Cinerea Fm, 12.7 m above base of 34.72 0.02 0.04 206Pb/238U
    [Show full text]
  • Mineral Resources of the Illinois Basin in the Context of Basin Evolution
    Mineral Resources of the Illinois Basin in the Context of Basin Evolution St. Louis, Missouri, January 22-23,1992 Program and Abstracts Edited by Martin B. Goldhaber and J. James Eidel U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 92-1 This report is preliminary and has not been edited or reviewed for conformity with U.S. Geological Survey, Illinois State Geological Survey, Kentucky Geological Survey, Missouri Division of Geology and Land Survey, and Indiana Geological Survey standards. PREFACE The mineral resources of the U.S. midcontinent were instrumental to the development of the U.S. economy. Mineral resources are an important and essential component of the current economy and will continue to play a vital role in the future. Mineral resources provide essential raw materials for the goods consumed by industry and the public. To assess the availability of mineral resources and contribute to the abib'ty to locate and define mineral resources, the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) has undertaken two programs in cooperation with the State Geological Surveys in the midcontinent region. In 1975, under the Conterminous U.S. Mineral Assessment Program (CUSMAP) work began on the Rolla 1° X 2° Quadrangle at a scale of 1:250,000 and was continued in the adjacent Springfield, Harrison, Joplin, and Paducah quadrangles across southern Missouri, Kansas, Illinois, Arkansas, and Oklahoma. Public meetings were held in 1981 to present results from the Rolla CUSMAP and in 1985 for the Springfield CUSMAP. In 1984, the Midcontinent Strategic and Critical Minerals Project (SCMP) was initiated by the USGS and the State Geological Surveys of 16 states to map and compile data at 1:1,000,000 scale and conduct related topical studies for the area from latitude 36° to 46° N.
    [Show full text]
  • Bedrock Geology of the Southern Half of the Knox 30
    Bedrock Geology of the Southern Half of the TODD A. THOMPSON, STATE GEOLOGIST Knox 30- X 60-Minute Quadrangle, Indiana By Patrick I. McLaughlin, Alyssa M. Bancroft, and Matthew R. Johnson Bloomington, Indiana 2021 -86°0'00" -86°15'00" 5 000 -86°7'30" 5 000 580000E 5 000 -86°22'30" 5 000 5 000 565000E 70 E 75 E -87°0'00" -86°52'30" -86°45'00" 5 000 5 000 -86°37'30" 5 000 5 000 -86°30'00" 545000E 50 E 55 E 60 E 505 515000E 520 25 E 30 E 35 E 40 E 146859 520 10 Summit Chapel 159301 Rutland Winona 17 Y 560 Argos T Da Houghton Y Lake 158174 Da 144404 N T Da 600 Round 560 4565000N U N 4565000N O U Lake 146860 Dt C 600 162469 O E 500 S C Da 10 10 Dunns ER 162054 Bass ORT Lake 143696 Old Tip Bridge P PER 39 Town Da AS S 400 E J 162049 Da 31 W 560 143695 0 North 0 0 520 146870 1 159302 W 600 S Judson Culver MUCKSHAW RD MUCKSHAW S 10 10 146864 Tippecanoe Dt Dt Maxinkuckee Lake COUNTY MARSHALL Dt Maxinkuckee Dt COUNTY KOSCIUSKO STARKE COUNTY STARKE 560 Aldine MARSHALL COUNTY Tefft San Pierre Lost 19 Da Lena Park Lake 146875 4560000N 35 4560 Da Bass 331 560 Station 117 Da Da Hartz Da Lake 600 560 Walnut 140912 Da Mentone 421 159300 CR 800 N 25 Ora MARSHALL COUNTY STARKE COUNTY 600 STARKE COUNTY 110 110 141955 PULASKI COUNTY Langenbahn FULTON COUNTY 158173 158082 PULASKI COUNTY Lake 560 17 Dt Da Radioville Dt 520 Richland Monterey Tiosa Talma Center 136071 39 Denham 560 31 136072 45 000 45 000 55 N Dt 141952 55 N 600 Zink 141951 141959 136070 Lake Beardstown Delong 140891 Clarks 144534 Dt 560 136073 Dt 520 Sevastopol Da 140894 144535 Dt 41°7'30" Dt
    [Show full text]
  • Paleoecological Analysis of the Clayton Formation (Paleocene) Near Malvern, Arkansas
    The University of Southern Mississippi The Aquila Digital Community Honors Theses Honors College Spring 5-2017 Paleoecological Analysis of the Clayton Formation (Paleocene) near Malvern, Arkansas Brenna J. Hart University of Southern Mississippi Follow this and additional works at: https://aquila.usm.edu/honors_theses Part of the Paleontology Commons Recommended Citation Hart, Brenna J., "Paleoecological Analysis of the Clayton Formation (Paleocene) near Malvern, Arkansas" (2017). Honors Theses. 513. https://aquila.usm.edu/honors_theses/513 This Honors College Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Honors College at The Aquila Digital Community. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of The Aquila Digital Community. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The University of Southern Mississippi Paleoecological Analysis of the Clayton Formation (Paleocene) near Malvern, Arkansas by Brenna Hart A Thesis Submitted to the Honors College of The University of Southern Mississippi in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Bachelor of Science in the Department of Geography and Geology May 2017 II Approved by ________________________________ Franklin Heitmuller, Ph.D., Associate Professor Department of Geography and Geology ________________________________ Mark Puckett, Ph.D., Chair Department of Geography and Geology ________________________________ Ellen Weinauer, Ph.D., Dean Honors College III Abstract The Clayton Formation is a section of the Midway Group immediately above the Cretaceous-Paleogene boundary that contains marine fossils from the Paleocene Epoch. The formation is composed of glauconitic sand, clay, marl, and limestone. Fossils within the formation commonly occur in clay or are concentrated in conglomeratic lag lenses.
    [Show full text]
  • The Pueblo in the Mojave Sink: an Archaeological Myth
    California State University, San Bernardino CSUSB ScholarWorks Theses Digitization Project John M. Pfau Library 2002 The pueblo in the Mojave Sink: An archaeological myth Barbara Ann Loren-Webb Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.lib.csusb.edu/etd-project Part of the Archaeological Anthropology Commons Recommended Citation Loren-Webb, Barbara Ann, "The pueblo in the Mojave Sink: An archaeological myth" (2002). Theses Digitization Project. 2107. https://scholarworks.lib.csusb.edu/etd-project/2107 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the John M. Pfau Library at CSUSB ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses Digitization Project by an authorized administrator of CSUSB ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE PUEBLO IN THE MOJAVE SINK: AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL MYTH A Thesis Presented to the Faculty of California State University, San Bernardino In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Masters of Arts in Interdisciplinary Studies by Barbara Ann Loren-Webb March 2003 THE PUEBLO IN THE MOJAVE SINK: AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL MYTH A Thesis Presented to the Faculty of California State University, San Bernardino by Barbara Ann Loren-Webb March 2003 Approved by: Russell Barber, Chair, Anthropology Date Pete Robertshesw, Anthropology ABSTRACT In 1929 Malcolm Rogers published a paper in which he stated that there was evidence of an Anasazi or Puebloan settlement or pueblo, in the Mojave Sink Region of the Mojave Desert. Since then, archaeologists have cited Rogers' publication and repeated his claim that such a pueblo was located in the Western Mojave Desert. The purpose of this thesis started out as a review of the existing evidence and to locate this pueblo.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 11. Glacial Lithofacies and Stratigraphy
    CHAPTER GLACIAL LITHOFACIES AND STRATIGRAPHY 11 J. Lee British Geological Survey, Nottingham, United Kingdom 11.1 INTRODUCTION Reconstructing the environments, dynamics, and record of past glaciation requires a detailed knowl- edge of both the products of glaciation—effectively the sediments, landforms, and glacitectonic structures that we see in the geological record, and the genetic processes that formed them (Fig. 11.1). Such an understanding of glacial deposits, landforms, and processes underpins our understanding of glacier behaviour, the links between ice masses, climate change, and other feed- back mechanisms, and the applied significance of glaciated terrains from the perspective of resources and geohazards (Fig. 11.1). Building all of this knowledge into a robust geological model requires the employment of a systematic methodology for describing, recording, and interpreting geological evidence. For glacial sediments the principal method, and one routinely employed elsewhere in sedimentology, is the hierarchical lithofacies approach. In turn, understanding how these lithofacies and other glacial features (e.g., landforms and glacitectonic structures) fit together and correlate in both time and space is called stratigraphy. Stratigraphy is a key concept within geology. It enables the development of a framework of events and features that describe both the evolution of a geological succession and how that succession fits into the wider palaeoenvironmental picture or Earth system. Within the context of glacial geology, e.g., a succession of glacigenic sediments and landforms in the Great Lakes region of Canada might document the repeated glaciation of the area. Studying the sediments (lithofacies) and landforms plus their temporal and spatial relationships (stratigraphy), would enable the number of ice advances, their flow directions, and associated geological processes to be reconstructed.
    [Show full text]
  • Plate 80 NEW Combined Strat Column Platetlhedits
    GEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF ALABAMA PLATE 80 Highland Rim and Piedmont Province Cumberland Plateau Alabama Valley and Ridge Piedmont Upland Chronostratigraphy East Gulf INNER NORTHERN PIEDMONT SOUTHERN PIEDMONT WESTERN VALLEY AND RIDGE EASTERN VALLEY AND RIDGE PIEDMONT THEM NW SE Coastal Plain Lithostratigraphic Units A NORTHERN PIEDMONT SERIES TALLADEGA COOSA TALLAPOOSA Group SERIES DADEVILLE OPELIKA PINE MTN. UCHEE SERIES SERIES SYSTEM SYSTEM SYSTEM SYSTEM ERATHEM ERATHEM SW NE ERATHEM W E SW NE SW NE ER BLOCK BLOCK BLOCK COMPLEX COMPLEX BLOCK BLOCK Holocene Alluvial and terrace deposits Alluvial and Alluvial and Alluvial and Alluvial and Alluvial and Alluvial and Alluvial and terrace deposits terrace deposits terraceLow-Grade deposits Metamorphicterrace deposits Rocks terrace deposits terrace deposits terrace deposits ERNARY Alluvial, coastal, and terrace deposits T A Paleozoic* Hillabee Greenstone QUATERNARY CENOZOIC Pleistocene CENOZOIC QU QUATERNARY Talladega Group Chulafinnee Schist Citronelle Formation PENNSYLVANIAN Silurian? - Jemison Chert Pliocene ? Upper Devonian Butting Ram Sandstone Graham Ferry Formation Lay Dam Formation Pottsville Formation PENNSYLVANIAN Pottsville Formation Pottsville Formation Pascagoula Formation Cambrian ? Heflin Phyllite Miocene Hattiesburg Formation Miocene Series NEOGENE Undifferentiated Parkwood Pennington Parkwood Parkwood and Parkwood Silacauga Marble Group Pennington Fms. Gantts Quarry Formation Catahoula Formation Fm. Fm. Formation Formation Cambrian?- Almond undifferentiated Gooch Branch Chert Ordovician?
    [Show full text]
  • Ge-259267-18
    GE-259267-18 NEH Application Cover Sheet (GE-259267) Exhibitions: Planning PROJECT DIRECTOR Mr. Jeffrey Forgeng E-mail: [email protected] Curator of arms & armor and medieval art Phone: 508.793.4481 55 Salisbury St Fax: Worcester, MA 01609-3123 USA Field of expertise: Medieval Studies INSTITUTION Worcester Art Museum Worcester, MA 01609-3123 APPLICATION INFORMATION Title: Permanent Installation of Medieval Arms & Armour Grant period: From 2018-04-02 to 2019-03-29 Project field(s): Arts, General; Military History; Medieval History Description of project: The Worcester Art Museum seeks funding from the NEH to support planning activities for the long-term installation of its collection of arms and armor. WAM acquired the highly significant collection in 2014 from the Higgins Armory Museum and plans to design an innovative installation, consisting partly of open storage, with emphasis on accessibility, both physical and intellectual. The grant would help fund preparatory activities including specialist review of the collection, brainstorming by regional academics and educators to suggest possible interpretive approaches, and consultation with interpretation and design specialists to turn these ideas into concrete plans for a compelling and engaging installation that will appeal to diverse audiences. The installation’s core humanities concepts will be the contrast between the superficial purpose of the objects and their actual complex functions, and the meaning of their enduring power as symbols today when they are no longer in actual use. BUDGET Outright Request 40,000.00 Cost Sharing 112,309.00 Matching Request 0.00 Total Budget 152,309.00 Total NEH 40,000.00 GRANT ADMINISTRATOR Mr.
    [Show full text]