BEFORE the STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION MAHARASHTRA – KONKAN REGION Appeal Under Section 19(3) of RTI Act 2005. Appeal No. KR-238/2008 Shri Mohammad Harun Kureshi, …

BEFORE THE STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION MAHARASHTRA – KONKAN REGION Appeal under Section 19(3) of RTI Act 2005. Appeal No. KR-238/2008 Shri Mohammad Harun Kureshi, ….. Appellant Madina Mutan Shop, Rabodi No.1,Thane..: 400 602. . V/s Public Information Officer, ….. Respondent Public Relation Officer, Thane Municipal Corporation, Pachapakhadi, Thane..

The Appellate Authority, Municipal Commissioner, Thane Municipal Corporation, Pachapakhadi, Thane.

Facts: The appellant by an application dated 5.4.2007 asked information regarding details of action taken against illegal meat sale on 18th April 2006. Interim Decision.

The appeal application has been perused. The papers attached do not show that this matter has been examined and considered at the level of the First Appellate Authority. I remand this appeal to the First Appellate Authority for giving a hearing to the appellant and for giving a reasoned decision with a view to facilitate flow of maximum information to the appellant. A compliance report should be submitted, within 45 days by the First Appellant Authority, to me. The Public Information Officer should bring this decision to the notice of his First Appellate Authority to avoid delay and penal action. Sd/--- (Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 20th June, 2008. Decision.

Appellant is present. First Appellate Authority Dr. R.T. Kendre, Medical Officer of Health, Thane Municipal Corporation is present. The matter has been already be decided vide Appeal No. KR-110/2008 before the Commission. Another appeal on the same original application cannot be entertained.

(Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 1st April, 2009.

- 1 - BEFORE THE STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION MAHARASHTRA – KONKAN REGION Appeal under Section 19(3) of RTI Act 2005. Appeal No.KR-768/2008 Shri Bhushan Uttamrao Tayade, ….. Appellant R. C. F. Colony, B/24/3, Alibag-Raigad, Dist. Raigad -402 209. V/s. Public Information Officer, ….. Respondent Tahsildar Office, Sangavo, Daryapur, Dist. Amravati.

The Appellate Authority, Sub-Divisional Officer, Daryapur, Tal. Daryapur, Dist. Amravati.

Facts: A copy of the above appeal is annexed. Interim Decision

The information sought is of a factual nature. Primafacia no law points are involved. I remand this case to the First Appellate Authority. He should invite the appellant for a hearing and thereafter give a reasoned decision with a view to provide maximum information to the appellant. A compliance report should be submitted to me within 45 days. Sd/--- (Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 9th July, 2008. Decision.

Appellant is present. Representative of First appellate Authority, Shri P.P. Solanke, Awal Karkun ( Sanjay Gandhi Yojana) is present.

Case has been perused in consultation with appellant. It is seen that the information sought by appellant has been substantially made available.

The appeal concludes.

(Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 1st April, 2009.

- 2 -

BEFORE THE STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION MAHARASHTRA – KONKAN REGION Appeal under Section 19(3) of RTI Act 2005. Appeal No.KR- 391/2008 Shri Suresh Ghevarchand Sharma, ….. Appellant. Garden View, Building – B, 103, Virat Nagar, Post: Virar, Taluka : Vasai, District :Thane ; 401 303. V/s. Public Information Officer, ….. Respondent Head Mistress, Zilla Parishad Nehru Hindi Vidyalaya, Virar, Taluka ; Vasai, Dist ; Thane.

The Appellate Authority, Head Mistress, Zilla Parishad Nehru Hindi Vidyalaya, Virar, Taluka ; Vasai, Dist ; Thane.

Facts: A copy of the above appeal is annexed. Interim Decision It would be necessary to know the present status of this case. Appellant filed the first appeal u/s 19 (1) of the Right To Information Act but primafacie there is no decision by First Appellate Authority. I, therefore, remand this case to the First Appellate Authority for inviting and giving a hearing to the appellant for examining the points raised by him in his appeal with a view to provide maximum information if due under the act and give appellant better satisfaction by issuing a reasoned order. A compliance report should be sent within 45 days by the First Appellate Authority to me. Sd/--- (Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 31st July, 2008. Decision.

Appellant is present. Public Information Officer Shri J.R. Kamble, Office Superintendent of Block Education Officer, Vasai and Smt. Vimala Prakash Shesha, Head Mistress, Zilla Parishad Nehru Vidhyalaya Virar are present.

Appellant is raising new points about information in his appeal. Information about original matters has been substantially provided.

The appeal concludes.

(Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 1st April, 2009. - 3 -

BEFORE THE STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION MAHARASHTRA – KONKAN REGION Appeal under Section 19(3) of RTI Act 2005. Appeal No. KR-76/2008 Shri Shakil Ahmed Tayyab Momin, ….. Appellant House No.180/A, Kotargate, Islampura, Bhivandi, Dist-Thane.

V/s Public Information Officer, ….. Respondent Dy. City Engineer (Works) Bhivandi-Nijampur Municipal Corporation, Bhivandi, Dist. Thane.

The Appellate Authority, City Engineer, Bhivandi-Nijampur Municipal Corporation, Bhivandi, Dist. Thane

Facts: The appellant by an application dated 27.11.06 asked for information regarding details of acquisition in survey No.93/32 at Fatima Nagar, (Tayyab Nagar ) Nagaon-2 Bhivandi.

Interim Decision

The appeal application has been perused. There is an indication that the First Appellate Authority considered this case and gave a decision on 15.6.2006. Much time has passed since then and therefore, it would be necessary to know the present status of this case. I, therefore, remand this case to the First Appellate Authority for inviting and giving a hearing to the appellant for examining the points raised by him in his appeal with a view to provide maximum information if due under the act and give appellant better satisfaction. A compliance report should be sent within 45 days. The Public Information Officer should bring this decision to the notice of his First Appellate Authority to avoid delay. Sd/--- (Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 18th June, 2008. Decision

Appellant is present. Public Information Officer, Shri Shan Ali Sayyad, Deputy Engineer and First Appellate Authority Shri N.T. Patil, City Engineer, Bhiwandi-Najampur City Municipal Corporation are present. Panchanama of the lands under question have been given to the appellant in July 2007. Public Information Officer undertakes to give a letter about the payment of compensation to the appellant. Public Information Officer has not acted on the decision of the First Appellate Authority. He should be careful in future. The appeal concludes.

(Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 2 April, 2009.

- 4 -

BEFORE THE STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION MAHARASHTRA – KONKAN REGION Appeal under Section 19(3) of RTI Act 2005. Appeal No.KR-1158/2008

Shri Yadav Ravji Gangaram, ….. Appellant. At & Post : Oras-Sindhudurgnagari, Taluka : Kudal, District : Sindhudurg.

V/s.

Public Information Officer, ….. Respondent Inspector ( Postage), Kankavali Sub Division, Kankavali, Taluka : Kankavali, District : Sindhudurg.

The Appellate Authority, Inspector ( Postage), Kankavali Sub Division, Kankavali, Taluka : Kankavali, District : Sindhudurg.

Facts: A copy of the above appeal is annexed.

Interim Decision

Appellant filed the first appeal u/s 19 (1) of the Right To Information Act but primafacie there is no decision by First Appellate Authority.

A compliance report should be sent within 45 days by the First Appellate Authority to me.

Sd/--- (Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 28th November, 2008. Decision

Appellant is present. Shri Deepak Pandurang Bhovar, Post office Inspector, Kankavali is present. The Postal Department comes under Central Information Commission and therefore no further action from this Commission.

(Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:-2nd April, 2009.

- 5 - ¸üÖ•µÖ ´ÖÖ×ÆüŸÖß †ÖµÖÖêÖ, ´ÖÆüÖ¸üÖÂ™Òü, úÖëúÖ ÖÓ›ü¯Ößšü µÖÖÓ“Öê ÃÖ´ÖÖê¸ü ´ÖÖ×ÆüŸÖß“ÖÖ †×¬ÖúÖ¸ü †×¬Ö×ÖµÖ´Ö 2005 “Öê ú»Ö´Ö 19(3) †¾ÖµÖê Û¾¤üŸÖßµÖ †×¯Ö»Ö. †×¯Ö»Ö Îú´ÖÖÓú : êú†Ö¸ü-1959/2008 ÁÖß ×Ö×ŸÖÖ •ÖµÖ¾ÖÓŸÖ ¤êü¿Ö´ÖãÖ, ... †×¯Ö»ÖúŸÖÖÔ ¤îü×Öú ØÆü¤ãü ÃÖÓÖÏÖ´Ö úÖµÖÖÔ»ÖµÖ, ¿ÖÖò¯Ö ÖÓ²Ö¸ü 1, †Ö×¤üŸµÖ†¯ÖÖ™Ôü´Öë™ü, ÃÖ¾ÖÖì¤üµÖ ÖÖ¸ü, ²Ö¤ü»ÖÖ¯Öæ¸ü (¯Ö.), ×•Ö»ÆüÖ : šüÖÖê. ×¾Ö¹ý¬¤ü •ÖÖ ´ÖÖ×ÆüŸÖß †×¬ÖúÖ¸üß, ... ÃÖÖ´ÖÖê¾ÖÖ»Öê ¤ãüµµÖ´Ö ×Ö²ÖÓ¬Öú, ´Öã¦üÖÓú ¿Öã»ú, ú»µÖÖÖ-2, ŸÖÖ»ÖãúÖ ú»µÖÖÖ,×•Ö»ÆüÖ : šüÖÖê.

¯ÖÏ£Ö´Ö †×¯Ö»ÖßµÖ ¯ÖÏÖ×¬ÖúÖ¸üß, ×•Ö»ÆüÖ ×Ö²ÖÓ¬Öú, ´Öã¦üÖÓú ¿Öã»ú, ×•Ö»ÆüÖ×¬ÖúÖ¸üß úÖµÖÖÔ»ÖµÖ ‡´ÖÖ¸üŸÖ,šüÖÖê, ×•Ö»ÆüÖ : šüÖÖê.

ÃÖÖê²ÖŸÖ : †×¯Ö»ÖÖ“Öß ¯ÖÏŸÖ •ÖÖê›ü»Öß †ÖÓÆêü. †ÓŸÖ×¸ü´Ö †Ö¤êü¿Ö

´ÖÖ×ÆüŸÖß“ÖÖ †×¬ÖúÖ¸ü †×¬Ö×ÖµÖ´Ö 2005 “Öê ú»Ö´Ö 19(1) †¾ÖµÖê †×¯Ö»ÖúŸÖÖÔ µÖÖÓÖß ¤üÖÖ»Ö êú»Öê»µÖÖ ¯ÖÏ£Ö´Ö †×¯Ö»ÖÖ¾Ö¸ü, ¯ÖÏ£Ö´Ö †×¯Ö»ÖßµÖ ¯ÖÏÖ×¬ÖúÖ¸üß µÖÖÓÖß ×ÖÖÔµÖ ×¤ü»µÖÖ“Öê ÃÖéúŸÖ¤ü¿ÖÔÖß †ÖœüôæûÖ µÖêŸÖ ÖÖÆüß. µÖÖÃŸÖ¾Ö, ÃÖ¤ü¸ü ¯ÖÏú¸üÖß ´Öß †ÃÖê ×Ö¤ìü¿Ö ¤êüŸÖÖê úß, ¯ÖÏ£Ö´Ö †×¯Ö»ÖßµÖ ¯ÖÏÖ×¬ÖúÖ¸üß µÖÖÓÖß †×¯Ö»ÖúŸÖÖÔ µÖÖÓÖÖ ÃÖãÖÖ¾ÖÖß“Öß ‹ú ÃÖÓ¬Öß ¤êü‰úÖ †×¯Ö»ÖúŸÖÖÔ µÖÖÓÖß Û¾¤üŸÖßµÖ †×¯Ö»ÖÖŸÖ ˆ¯ÖÛÃ£ÖŸÖ êú»Öê»µÖÖ ´ÖãªÖÓ“ÖÖ ×¾Ö“ÖÖ¸ü ú¸üµÖÖÓŸÖ µÖÖ¾ÖÖ ¾Ö †×¯Ö»ÖúŸÖÖÔ µÖÖÓÖß †×¯Ö»ÖÖŸÖ ˆ¯ÖÛÃ£ÖŸÖ êú»Öê»µÖÖ ´ÖãªÖÓ¾Ö¸ü ¯Ö×¸ü¯ÖãÖÔ ´ÖÖ×ÆüŸÖß, †×¬Ö×ÖµÖ´ÖÖŸÖß»Ö ŸÖ¸üŸÖã¤üßÖãÃÖÖ¸ü ˆ¯Ö»Ö²¬Ö ú¹ýÖ ¤êüµÖÖ“µÖÖ¥üÂ™üßÖê ¯ÖÏ£Ö´Ö †×¯Ö»ÖßµÖ ¯ÖÏÖ×¬ÖúÖ¸üß µÖÖÓÖß µÖÖ ¯ÖÏú¸üÖß ÃÖúÖ¸üÖ †Ö¤êü¿Ö ¯ÖÖ¸üßŸÖ ú¸üÖ¾ÖêŸÖ, •ÖêÖê ú¹ýÖ †×¯Ö»ÖúŸÖÖÔ µÖÖÓ“Öê ÃÖ´ÖÖ¬ÖÖÖ ÆüÖê‡Ô»Ö ˆ¯Ö¸üÖêŒŸÖ ¯ÖÏ´ÖÖÖê êú»Öê»µÖÖ úÖµÖÔ¾ÖÖÆüß“ÖÖ úÖµÖÔ¯ÖæŸÖá †Æü¾ÖÖ»Ö 45 ×¤ü¾ÖÃÖÖÓŸÖ ¯ÖÏ£Ö´Ö †×¯Ö»ÖßµÖ ¯ÖÏÖ×¬ÖúÖ¸üß µÖÖÓÖß †ÖµÖÖêÖÖÃÖ ÃÖÖ¤ü¸ü ú¸üÖ¾ÖÖ.

ÃÖÖê²ÖŸÖ : ¾Ö¸üß»Ö ¯ÖÏ´ÖÖÖê. ÃÖÆüß/-- úÖëúÖ ³Ö¾ÖÖ, ( Ö¾ÖßÖ ãú´ÖÖ¸ü ) ²Öê»ÖÖ¯Öæ¸ü, Ö¾Öß ´ÖãÓ²Ö‡Ô : 400 614. ¸üÖ•µÖ ´ÖÖ×ÆüŸÖß †ÖµÖãŒŸÖ, ×¤üÖÖÓú : 18 ×›üÃÖë²Ö¸ü, 2008. úÖëúÖ ÖÓ›ü¯Ößšü †Ö¤êü¿Ö †×¯Ö»ÖÖ£Öá ˆ¯ÖÛÃ£ÖŸÖ †ÖÆêüŸÖ. •ÖÖ ´ÖÖ×ÆüŸÖß †×¬ÖúÖ¸üß, ÁÖß ¾Æüß.‹ÃÖ.³ÖÖ»Öê¸üÖ¾Ö, ÃÖÆü ¤ãüµµÖ´Ö ×Ö²ÖÓ¬Öú, ¾ÖÖÔ-2 ú»µÖÖÖ Îú´ÖÖÓú 2 ¾Ö ¯ÖÏ£Ö´Ö †×¯Ö»ÖßµÖ ¯ÖÏÖ×¬ÖúÖ¸üß ÁÖß ¸ü.¤ü. ¤ü´ÖúÖë›ü¾ÖÖ¸ü, ÃÖÆü ×•Ö»ÆüÖ ×Ö²ÖÓ¬Öú, ¾ÖÖÔ-1, šüÖÖê ¿ÖÆü¸ü ˆ¯ÖÛÃ£ÖŸÖ †ÖÆêüŸÖ. úÖÖ¤ü¯Ö¡ÖÓÖÓ“Öß ŸÖ¯ÖÖÃÖÖß ú¸üµÖÖÓŸÖ †Ö»Öß. ×¤üÖÖÓú 7/2/2009 “µÖÖ ¯Ö¡ÖÖ¾ÖµÖê •ÖÖ ´ÖÖ×ÆüŸÖß †×¬ÖúÖ¸üß µÖÖÓÖß ¯ÖµÖÖÔ¯ŸÖ ´ÖÖ×ÆüŸÖß ˆ¯Ö»Ö²¬Ö êú»Öê»Öß †ÖÆêü. †×¯Ö»Ö ÃÖÓ¯ÖãÂ™üÖŸÖ µÖêŸÖê. úÖëúÖ ³Ö¾ÖÖ, ( Ö¾ÖßÖ ãú´ÖÖ¸ü ) ²Öê»ÖÖ¯Öæ¸ü, Ö¾Öß ´ÖãÓ²Ö‡Ô : 400 614. ¸üÖ•µÖ ´ÖÖ×ÆüŸÖß †ÖµÖãŒŸÖ, ×¤üÖÖÓú : 2 ‹×¯ÖÏ»Ö, 2009. úÖëúÖ ÖÓ›ü¯Ößšü - 6 - BEFORE THE STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION MAHARASHTRA – KONKAN REGION Appeal under Section 19(3) of RTI Act 2005. Appeal No.KR- 2686/2008 Shri Kiran M. Rathod, ….. Appellant. Deputy.Engineer, Mira-Bhayander Municipal Corporation, Bhayandar, District : Thane. V/s. Public Information Officer, ….. Respondent Deputy Engineer, Encroachment & Illegal Constructions, Mira-Bhayander Municipal Corporation, Bhayandar, District : Thane.

The Appellate Authority, Municipal Deputy Commissioner, Mira-Bhayander Municipal Corporation, Bhayandar, District : Thane.

Facts: A copy of the above appeal is annexed.

Interim Decision It would be necessary to know the present status of this case. The information requested is of a factual nature. He filed the first appeal u/s 19 (1) of the Right To Information Act,2005 and the First Appellate Authority gave a decision. The appellant says that he has not got the information. I, therefore, remand this case to the First Appellate Authority for inviting and giving a hearing to the appellant for examining the points raised by him in his appeal with a view to provide maximum information if due under the act and give appellant better satisfaction by issuing a reasoned order. A compliance report should be sent within 45 days by the First Appellate Authority to me. Sd/--- (Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 21st July, 2008. Decision

Public Information Officer Shri Kiran Rathod, Deputy Engineer Mira- Bhayandar Municipal Corporation is present. The First Appellate Authority Shri Omprakash Divte, Deputy Municipal Commissioner has given a letter dated 31.3.2009 that the information sought by the appellant has already been supplied. The First Appellate Authority by an order dated 30.1.2008 in First Appeal No.12/2007-08 has imposed a penalty of Rs.100/- on the Public Information Officer. Since the First Appellate Authority is not empowered to impose penalty under the R.T.I. Act, 2005. The order dated 30.1.2008 as far as the imposition of penalty is concerned is set side. The remaining decision survives. The appeal concludes.

(Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:-2nd April, 2009. - 7 -

BEFORE THE STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION MAHARASHTRA – KONKAN REGION Appeal under Section 19(3) of RTI Act 2005. Appeal No.KR- 2038/2008

Shri Sandeep Ramchandra Khirade, ….. Appellant. At : Ganeshpuri, Taluka:Bhiwandi, District : Thane.

V/s.

Public Information Officer, ….. Respondent Gram Sevak, Gram Panchayat, Ganeshpuri, Taluka : Bhiwandi,Dist : Thane.

The Appellate Authority, Extension Officer, Gram Panchayat, Panchayat Samiti, Bhiwandi, Taluka : Bhiwandi, Dist : Thane.

Facts: A copy of the above appeal is annexed. Interim Decision

It would be necessary to know the present status of this case.

Appellant filed the first appeal u/s 19 (1) of the Right To Information Act but primafacie there is no decision By First Appellate Authority.

A compliance report should be sent within 45 days by the First Appellate Authority to me.

Sd/--- (Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 22nd July, 2008. Conclusion

First Appellate Authority has given a decision on 7.3.2009.

(Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:-2nd April, 2009.

- 8 - BEFORE THE STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION MAHARASHTRA – KONKAN REGION Appeal under Section 19(3) of RTI Act 2005. Appeal No./ KR-1915/08

Shri Shivanand R. Ankolekar, Appellant A-8, M.I.D.C., Flatted Factory, L.B.S., Marg., Wagle Estate, Thane (W), District : Thane : 400 604.

V/s.

Public Information Officer … .. Respondent Deputy Engineer & PA-1, M.I.D.C. Division-1, Wagle Estate, Thane (W), District : Thane ; 400 604.

The Appellate Authority Executive Engineer & PA-1, M.I.D.C. Division-1, Wagle Estate, Thane (W), District : Thane ; 400 604.

Facts Please see appeal application annexed.

Interim Decision

First Appellate Authority should furnish his comments on the grounds of appeal mentioned in the attached appeal application within 15 days. Sd/--- (Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:-15th December, 2008. Decision

Appellant is present. Public Information Officer Shri P.S. Jadhav, Deputy Engineer and Shri V.B. Targe, First Appellate Authority and Executive Engineer are present. Case discussed in great detail. It is seen that the First Appellate Authority has given a decision on his application after giving a hearing on 14.11.2008. I am in general agreement with the First Appellate Authority. The appeal concludes.

(Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:-2nd April, 2009.

- 9 -

BEFORE THE STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION MAHARASHTRA – KONKAN REGION Appeal under Section 19(3) of RTI Act 2005. Appeal No.KR-194/2009

Shri Habib Ibrahim Khot, ….. Appellant At : Padmavati Bldg., 1st floor, Flat No. 5, Shivaji Chowk, Pen, Taluka Pan, Dist : Raigad.

V/s.

Public Information Officer, ….. Respondent Sub Divisional Police Officer, Pen Sub Division, Taluka Pen, Dist :Raigad.

The Appellate Authority, Additional Police Superintendent, Raigad-Alibag.

Facts:

A copy of the above appeal is annexed.

Decision

Appellant is present. Public Information Officer Shri A. P. Chavan, Sub Divisional Police Officer Pen is present. The First Appellate Authority has given a decision on 26.12.2009 with which I am in general agreement. However, as discussed, the Public Information Officer should give the Inward and Outward Number of the complaint application against the applicant for bringing the fact to the notice of the Court, if he so wishes. The appeal concludes.

(Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 4th April, 2009.

- 10 - BEFORE THE STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION MAHARASHTRA – KONKAN REGION Appeal under Section 19(3) of RTI Act 2005. Appeal No.KR- 860/2008 Shri Sohansingh Arjunsingh Labana, ….. Appellant Krishna Car Decorator, Kalyan-Ambarnath Road, Ulhasnagar : 3, Dist : Thane. . V/s. Public Information Officer, ….. Respondent Town Planner, (Town Planning Deptt.), Ulhasnagar Municiapl Corporation, Ulhasnagar-3, Dist : Thane.

The Appellate Authority, Deputy Municipal Commissioner, Ulhasnagar Municiapl Corporation, Ulhasnagar-3, Dist : Thane.

Facts: A copy of the above appeal is annexed. Interim Decision

Much time has passed since the original application was made and therefore, it would be necessary to know the present status of this case.

I, therefore, remand this case to the First Appellate Authority for inviting and giving a hearing to the appellant for examining the points raised by him in his appeal with a view to provide maximum information if due under the act and give appellant better satisfaction by issuing a reasoned order. This may be done even if the First Appellate Authority may have given an earlier decision which would automatically stand modified by the First Appellate Authority’s new decision.

A compliance report should be sent within 45 days by the First Appellate Authority to me.

Sd/---- (Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 9th July, 2008. Decision

Appellant is present. First Appellate Authority Shri A.P. Gurgule, Town Planner is present. The Public Information Officer has remained absent today as well as on previous two occasions i.e. on 13.2.2009 and 24.3.2009. His explanation for absence and non supply of information is received and orders about that will issue separately. The appellant says that he has received the information on 26.3. 2009.

(Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 4th April, 2009. - 11 - BEFORE THE STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION MAHARASHTRA – KONKAN REGION Appeal under Section 19(3) of RTI Act 2005. Appeal No.KR- 1653 /2008 Shri Vinaykumar R. Thakkar, … Appellant. Plot No.134/2, Jawaharnagar, Goregaon(West), Mumbai 400 062. V/s. Public Information Officer, ….. Respondent Deputy Superintendent of Police, Thane Rural, District Thane.

The Appellate Authority, Superintendent of Police, Thane Rural, District Thane.

Facts: A copy of the above appeal is annexed.

Interim Decision

Appellant is present. Public Information Officer is absent without any pre-intimation and has thereby caused obstruction in the implementation of the R.T. I. Act, 2005. The Public Information Officer should cause within 15 days why penalty should not imposed on him under Section 20 of the R.T.I. Act, 2005. Sd/-- Konkan Bhavan, (Navin Kumar) Belapur, Navi Mumbai. State Information Commissioner Date:- 15th November, 2008. Konkan Region

Decision

Appellant is not present. Public Information Officer Smt. R.R. Redkar, Deputy Superintendent of Police, Thane Rural is present.

The First Appellate Authority gave a decision on 27.6.2007, but the same has been only half implemented. The enquiry is over and a punishment order is issued on 14.3.2008, but the copy of same is still not given to the appellant.

The present Public Information Officer now undertakes to give the necessary copies of the punishment order and the relevant report to the appellant by 15.4.2009.

The appeal concludes.

Konkan Bhavan, (Navin Kumar) Belapur, Navi Mumbai. State Information Commissioner Date:- 4th April, 2009. Konkan Region

- 12 -

¸üÖ•µÖ ´ÖÖ×ÆüŸÖß †ÖµÖÖêÖ, ´ÖÆüÖ¸üÖÂ™Òü, úÖëúÖ ÖÓ›ü¯Ößšü µÖÖÓ“Öê ÃÖ´ÖÖê¸ü ´ÖÖ×ÆüŸÖß“ÖÖ †×¬ÖúÖ¸ü †×¬Ö×ÖµÖ´Ö 2005 “Öê ú»Ö´Ö 19(3) †¾ÖµÖê Û¾¤üŸÖßµÖ †×¯Ö»Ö. †×¯Ö»Ö Îú´ÖÖÓú : êú†Ö¸ü-1198/2008

ÁÖß ´ÖÆëü¦ü •Öß †×œüµÖÖ, ... †×¯Ö»ÖúŸÖÖÔ ÃÖß/8,ÃÖÓ¬µÖÖ ¸üÖÖ úÖê.†Öò¯Ö.ÆüÖîØÃÖÖ ÃÖÖêÃÖÖµÖ™üß, †ÖÖÏÖ ¸üÖê›ü, ú»µÖÖÖ : 421 301, ×•Ö»ÆüÖ šüÖÖê. ×¾Ö¹ý¬¤ü

•ÖÖ ´ÖÖ×ÆüŸÖß †×¬ÖúÖ¸üß, ... ¯ÖÏ×ŸÖ¾ÖÖ¤üß. ÖÖ¸ü ¸ü“ÖÖÖúÖ¸ü (ú.×¾Ö.), ú»µÖÖÖ-›üÖë×²Ö¾Ö»Öß ´ÖÆüÖÖÖ¸ü ¯ÖÖ×»ÖúÖ, ú»µÖÖÖ, ŸÖÖ»ÖãúÖ ú»µÖÖÖ, ×•Ö»ÆüÖ šüÖÖê.

¯ÖÏ£Ö´Ö †×¯Ö»ÖßµÖ ¯ÖÏÖ×¬ÖúÖ¸üß, ÃÖÆüÖµµÖú ÃÖÓ“ÖÖ»Öú, ÖÖ¸ü ¸ü“ÖÖÖ, ú»µÖÖÖ-›üÖë×²Ö¾Ö»Öß ´ÖÆüÖÖÖ¸ü ¯ÖÖ×»ÖúÖ, ú»µÖÖÖ, ŸÖÖ»ÖãúÖ ú»µÖÖÖ, ×•Ö»ÆüÖ šüÖÖê.

¯ÖÆüÖ¾Öê : ÃÖÖê²ÖŸÖ †×¯Ö»Ö †•ÖÔ •ÖÖê›ü»ÖÖ †ÖÆêü.

×ÖÖÔµÖ

†×¯Ö»ÖÖ£Öá ˆ¯ÖÛÃ£ÖŸÖ †ÖÆêüŸÖ. •ÖÖ ´ÖÖ×ÆüŸÖß †×¬ÖúÖ¸üß ÁÖß ¸üÖ•Öê¿Ö Ö. ´ÖÖê¸êü, ÖÖ¸ü ¸ü“ÖÖÖúÖ¸ü (ú.×¾Ö.), ú»µÖÖÖ-›üÖë×²Ö¾Ö»Öß ´ÖÆüÖÖÖ¸ü ¯ÖÖ×»ÖúÖ, ú»µÖÖÖ ˆ¯ÖÛÃ£ÖŸÖ †ÖÆêüŸÖ. ÃÖÖÖê»Ö “Ö“ÖÖÔ —ÖÖ»Öß. †×¯Ö»ÖÖ£Öá µÖÖÓÖÖ ×¾ÖúÖÃÖ µÖÖê•ÖÖê“ÖÖ ÃÖÓ²ÖÓ×¬ÖŸÖ ÖúÖ¿ÖÖ ¤êüµÖÖÓŸÖ †Ö»Öê»ÖÖ †ÖÆêü. †×¯Ö»ÖÖ£Öá µÖÖÓÖß †Ö¯Ö»µÖÖ •Ö×´ÖÖß“Öß ´ÖÖê•ÖÖß ú¹ýÖ “ÖãŸÖã:×ÃÖ´ÖÖ ×ÖÛ¿“ÖŸÖ ú¹ýÖ ‘ÖêÖê µÖÖêµÖ ÆüÖê‡Ô»Ö. ŸµÖÖÖÓŸÖ¸ü ´ÖÆüÖÖÖ¸ü ¯ÖÖ×»ÖêúÖê ŸµÖÖÓ“µÖÖ •Ö×´ÖÖß´Ö¬µÖê ¯ÖÏ¾Öê¿Ö ú¸üµÖÖú¸üßŸÖÖÓ ¸üÃŸµÖÖÃÖÓ²ÖÓ¬Öß“µÖÖ ¯ÖÏ¿ÖÖ¾Ö¸ü µÖÖêµÖ ŸÖß úÖµÖÔ¾ÖÖÆüß ú¸üÖ¾Öß. †×¯Ö»Ö ÃÖÓ¯ÖãÂ™üÖŸÖ µÖêŸÖê.

úÖëúÖ ³Ö¾ÖÖ, ( Ö¾ÖßÖ ãú´ÖÖ¸ü ) ²Öê»ÖÖ¯Öæ¸ü, Ö¾Öß ´ÖãÓ²Ö‡Ô ¸üÖ•µÖ ´ÖÖ×ÆüŸÖß †ÖµÖãŒŸÖ, ×¤üÖÖÓú 4 ‹×¯ÖÏ»Ö, 2009. úÖëúÖ ÖÓ›ü¯Ößšü - 13 -

BEFORE THE STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION MAHARASHTRA – KONKAN REGION Appeal under Section 19(3) of RTI Act 2005. Appeal No.KR-2540/2008 Shri Ramesh Vijay Pandit, ….. Appellant At. Post- Halvan, Brahmin Wadi, Tal. Kankavali, Dist-Sindhudurg. V/s. Public Information Officer, ….. Respondent Resident Naib Tahsildar, Tahsildar Office Kankavali, Tal. Kankavali, Dist-Sindhudurg.

The Appellate Authority, Tahsildar, Tahsildar Office Kankavali, Tal. Kankavali, Dist-Sindhudurg.

Facts: A copy of the above appeal is annexed.

Interim Decision

It would be necessary to know the present status of this case. The information requested is of a factual nature. Appellant filed the first appeal u/s 19 (1) of the Right To Information Act 2005 and the First Appellate Authority gave a decision. The appellant says that he has not got the information. I, therefore, remand this case to the First Appellate Authority for inviting and giving one more hearing to the appellant for examining the points raised by him in his appeal with a view to provide maximum information if due under the act and give appellant better satisfaction by issuing another reasoned order to the supercession of the earlier order. A compliance report should be sent within 45 days by the First Appellate Authority to me.

Sd/--- (Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 22nd July, 2008. Decision

First Appellate Authority has given a decision on 14.11.2008. The appellant says that there has been much delay in supplying the information. Original application is dated 1.11.2007. Thus there is a delay of more than one year in supplying the information. The then Public Information Officer Shri J.N. Katkar, Resident Naib Tahsildar should show cause within 15 days, why Penal action should not betaken against him.

Konkan Bhavan, (Navin Kumar) Belapur, Navi Mumbai. State Information Commissioner Date:- 4th April, 2009. Konkan Region - 14 -

ÁÖß ÃÖÓ×¤ü¯Ö ²ÖÖôûéúÂÖ ¾ÖŸÖÔú, ... †×¯Ö»ÖÖ£Öá ¸üÖ. ˆ´Öêôê, ŸÖÖ»ÖãúÖ : ¾ÖÃÖ‡Ô, ×•Ö»ÆüÖ šüÖÖê. : 401 202.

×¾Ö¹ý¬¤ü

•ÖÖ ´ÖÖ×ÆüŸÖß †×¬ÖúÖ¸üß ŸÖ£ÖÖ ... ¯ÖÏ×ŸÖ¾ÖÖ¤üß ŸÖ»ÖÖšüß ÃÖ•ÖÖ ¯ÖÖ¸üÖêôû, ŸÖÖ»ÖãúÖ : ¾ÖÃÖ‡Ô, ×•Ö»ÆüÖ šüÖÖê. : 401 202.

¯ÖÏ£Ö´Ö †×¯Ö»ÖßµÖ ¯ÖÏÖ×¬ÖúÖ¸üß ŸÖ£ÖÖ ´ÖÓ›üôû †×¬ÖúÖ¸üß, ´ÖÖÓ›ü¾Öß (±úÖ¤ü¸ü¾ÖÖ›üß-ÖÖê×Ö¾Ö¸êü)ü, ŸÖÖ»ÖãúÖ : ¾ÖÃÖ‡Ô, ×•Ö»ÆüÖ šüÖÖê. : 401 202.

¯ÖÆüÖ¾Öê : ÃÖÖê²ÖŸÖ †×¯Ö»ÖÖ“Öß ¯ÖÏŸÖ •ÖÖê›ü»Öß †ÖÆêü.

×ÖÖÔµÖ

†×¯Ö»ÖÖ£Öá ˆ¯ÖÛÃ£ÖŸÖ †ÖÆêüŸÖ.

¯ÖÏ£Ö´Ö †×¯Ö»ÖßµÖ ¯ÖÏÖ×¬ÖúÖ¸üß µÖÖÓÖß ×¤üÖÖÓú 27/8/2008 ¸üÖê•Öß ×ÖÖÔµÖ ×¤ü»Öê»ÖÖ †ÖÆêü. ŸµÖÖ“µÖÖ¿Öß ´Öß ÃÖÆü´ÖŸÖ †ÖÆêü.

†×¯Ö»Ö ÃÖÓ¯ÖãÂ™üÖŸÖ µÖêŸÖê.

úÖëúÖ ³Ö¾ÖÖ, ( Ö¾ÖßÖ ãú´ÖÖ¸ü ) ²Öê»ÖÖ¯Öæ¸ü, Ö¾Öß ´ÖãÓ²Ö‡Ô ¸üÖ•µÖ ´ÖÖ×ÆüŸÖß †ÖµÖãŒŸÖ, ×¤üÖÖÓú : 4 ‹×¯ÖÏ»Ö, 2009. úÖëúÖ ÖÓ›ü¯Ößšü

- 15 -

BEFORE THE STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION MAHARASHTRA – KONKAN REGION Appeal under Section 19(3) of RTI Act 2005. Appeal No.KR-335/2009

Shri Mallikarjun Ganpati Tulse, ….. Appellant 1171/1, A Sidhartha, Near Ambarnath Post Office, Taluka : Ambernath, District : Thane.421 501. V/s. Public Information Officer, Director, Directorate of Insurance, Maharashtra State, Bandra (E), Mumbai : 400 051. ….. Respondent

The Appellate Authority, Director, Directorate of Insurance, Maharashtra State, Bandra (E), Mumbai : 400 051..

Facts: A copy of the above appeal is annexed.

Decision

Appellant is present. Public Information Officer, Shri L.M. Khan, Assistant Director of Insurance and First Appellate Authority Shri H.M. Deshpande, Director of Insurance, M.S., Mumbai are present.

The case has been discussed in great details.

The appellant was suspended during 1993-98, a Departmental Enquiry conducted and some punishment awarded. The First Appellate Authority should give the copy of suspension order and the report of the Enquiry Officer free of cost.

The appeal concludes.

(Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 6th April, 2009.

- 16 -

BEFORE THE STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION MAHARASHTRA – KONKAN REGION Appeal under Section 19(3) of RTI Act 2005. Appeal No.KR- 281/2009

Shri Kisan Hari Mukadam, ….. Appellant. At & Post ; Kasarvadavali, Ghod Bunder Rd., Taluka & Dist : Thane. . V/s.

Public Information Officer, ….. Respondent Joint District Registrar Grade-1, Thane City, Collector Office Bldg., 4th floor, Thane,District : Thane.

The Appellate Authority, Deputy Registrar Inspector General & Dy. Controller of Stamps, Konkan Division, Thane. District : Thane.

Facts:

A copy of the above appeal is annexed.

Decision

Appellant is present. Public Information Officer Shri R.D. Damkondwar, Joint

District Registrar, Class-I and First Appellate Authority Smt. Vandana Suryavanshi, Deputy

Inspector General of Registration, Konkan Region are present.

Case discussed in great detail. The decision of First Appellate Authority dated

17.11.2008 is set-aside. The First Appellate Authority should give another hearing to the appeallant before 30th May, 2009 and issue a reasoned decision with a view to give maximum information to the appellant.

(Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 6th April, 2009..

- 17 -

BEFORE THE STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION MAHARASHTRA – KONKAN REGION Appeal under Section 19(3) of RTI Act 2005. Appeal No.KR- 333/2009

Shri Vishwanath Keshav Chaudhari, ….. Appellant. At ; Salvad ( Pasthal), Taluka : Palghar, District : Thane.401 504.

V/s.

Public Information Officer, ….. Respondent Assistant Registrar, Co-opeartive Societies, Palghar, Taluka : Palghar, Dist : Thane.

The Appellate Authority, District Deputy Registrar, Co-operative Societies, Vardhavat Mansion, 1st floor, Shivaji Path, Thane (W), Dist : Thane : 400 601.

Facts:

A copy of the above appeal is annexed.

Decision

Appellant is absent. Public Information Officer is represented by Shri A.D. Patil, Assistant Registrar, First Appellate Authority is represented by Smt. S.K. Chopdekar, Assistant Registrar, from the office of District Deputy Registrar, Thane.

Case taken up on merits. The First Appellate Authority has given a reasoned decision with which I am in general agreement.

(Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 6th April, 2009.

- 18 -

BEFORE THE STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION MAHARASHTRA – KONKAN REGION Appeal under Section 19(3) of RTI Act 2005. Appeal No.KR- 285/2009

Shri Shivanand R. Ankolekar, ….. Appellant. A-8, M.I.D.C., Flatted Factory, L.B.S. Marg, Wagle Estate, Thane (W), District : Thane.401 504.

V/s.

Public Information Officer, ….. Respondent Assistant Commissioner of Police, Wagle Estate Division, Thane, Dist : Thane.

The Appellate Authority, Deputy Commissioner of Police, Zone – V, Thane City Police Commissionerate, Thane, Dist : Thane : 400 601.

Facts:

A copy of the above appeal is annexed.

Decision

Appellant is present. Public Information Officer Dr. V.M. Rathod, Assistant Commissioner of Police, Wagle Estate, Thane is present.

Case discussed in detail. First Appellate Authority has given a hearing and decision to the appellant vide letter dated 30.1.2009. Public Information Officer says that while investigating the complaint of appellant, the statement of one Shri Pradip Padmakar Joshi was recorded. A copy of the same, report of the Senior Inspector of Police, who investigated the case, addressed to State Public Information Officer be given to the appellant within 7 days.

(Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 6th April, 2009.

- 19 -

BEFORE THE STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION MAHARASHTRA – KONKAN REGION Appeal under Section 19(3) of RTI Act 2005. Appeal No.KR-1526/2008

Smt. Prita Prafulla Gharat, ….. Appellant. At ; Salvad ( Gharatwadi), Taluka : Palghar, District : Thane.401 504. V/s.

Public Information Officer, ….. Respondent Dy. Executive Engineer, Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Co. Ltd Takka Vasahat, Tal : Panvel, Dist : Raigad.

The Appellate Authority, Executive Engineer, Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Co. Ltd., Takka Vasahat, Taluka : Panvel, District : Raigad.

Facts:

A copy of the above appeal is annexed.

Decision

Appellant is absent. Public Information Officer Shri Narayanan, Deputy Executive Engineer, Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited, Takka Vasahat, Taluka : Panvel, District : Raigad is present.

The First Appellate Authority gave two opportunities for hearing which are not availed by the appellant. The First Appellate Authority then sent the relevant information to the appellant vide his letter of 11.7.2008.

The appeal concludes.

(Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 6th April, 2009.

- 20 -

BEFORE THE STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION MAHARASHTRA – KONKAN REGION Appeal under Section 19(3) of RTI Act 2005. Appeal No.KR-310/2009

Shri Pramod Surajmal Jadhav, ….. Appellant. Police Naik, Buckle No. 1290, Reserve Police Inspector’s office, (H.Q.), Office of the Commissioner of Police, C.B.D., Belapur, Navi Mumbai : 400 614.

V/s.

Public Information Officer, ….. Respondent Assistant Police Commissioner, Spl Branch, Office of the Commissioner of Police, C.B.D., Belapur, Navi Mumbai : 400 614.

The Appellate Authority, Deputy Commissioner of Police, Office of the Commissioner of Police, C.B.D., Belapur, Navi Mumbai : 400 614.

Facts:

A copy of the above appeal is annexed.

Decision

Appellant is present. Public Information Officer Shri V.P. Chavan, Administrative Officer, Office of the Commissioner of Police, C.B.D.,Belapur Navi Mumbai is present.

Case discussed in great detail. The First Appellate Authority has given a reasoned decision with which I am in general agreement. The appeal concludes.

(Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 6th April, 2009.

- 21 -

BEFORE THE STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION MAHARASHTRA – KONKAN REGION Appeal under Section 19(3) of RTI Act 2005. Appeal No.KR-334/2009

Shri Vitthal Dadarao Waghmare, ….. Appellant. 411, Opp. Vidhya Prasarak High School, Belapurgaon, Sector-19/20, Navi Mumbai : 400 614.

V/s.

Public Information Officer, ….. Respondent Chief Officer, Municipal Council Parbhani, District : Parbhani.

The Appellate Authority, Office of the Collector, Parbhani, ( Nagar Palika Prashasan ), District : Parbhani.

Facts:

A copy of the above appeal is annexed.

Decision

Appellant is absent. Public Information Officer Shri B.S. Dughate, Junior Engineer and First Appellate Authority Shri V.B. Nilawadh, Chief Officer, Municipal Council, Parbhani are present.

Case examined on merits. First Appellate Authority has given a reasoned decision on 12.1.2009 with which I am in general agreement.

This appeal, therefore, concludes.

(Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 6th April, 2009.

- 22 -

BEFORE THE STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION MAHARASHTRA – KONKAN REGION Appeal under Section 19(3) of RTI Act 2005. Appeal No. KR-356/2009

Shri R.R. Tripathi, ….. Appellant 101, F-Wing, Shanti Sagar Complex, Devji Nagar Road, Anjurphata, Bhiwandi, Taluka : Bhiwandi, Dist : Thane. . V/s

Public Information Officer, ….. Respondent Assistant Police Commissioner, East Division, Bhiwandi, Taluka : Bhiwandi, Dist : Thane.

The Appellate Authority, Deputy Commissioner of Police, Zone-2, Bhiwandi, Taluka : Bhiwandi, Dist : Thane

Facts: A copy of above appeal is annexed

Decision.

Appellant is present. Public Information Officer Shri S.N. Jadhav, Assistant Police Commissioner, East Division, Bhiwandi is present. I am in general agreement with the decision of the First Appellate Authority given on 21.2.2009. It is however, seen that information asked vide item No. 5 & 6 is of a general nature and can be given. Public Information Officer agrees to give this information within a week.

The appeal concludes.

(Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 8th April, 2009..

- 23 - BEFORE THE STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION MAHARASHTRA – KONKAN REGION Appeal under Section 19(3) of RTI Act 2005. Appeal No.KR-2460/2008

Shri Sahadev Ramchandra Zende, ….. Appellant. At : Bharat-Bhim, 6264, Budhawar Peth, Chhatre Talim Galli, Miraj, District : Sangli, V/s. Public Information Officer, ….. Respondent Shirastedar, Office of the Sub Divisional Officer, Chiplun, Taluka : Chiplun, District : Ratnagiri.

The Appellate Authority, Sub Divisional Officer, Chiplun, Chiplun Sub Division, Taluka : Chiplun, District : Ratnagiri.

Facts: A copy of the above appeal is annexed.

Interim Decision

Appellant filed the first appeal u/s 19 (1) of the Right To Information Act but primafacie there is no decision by First Appellate Authority.

A compliance report should be sent within 45 days by the First Appellate Authority to me.

Sd/--- (Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 14th October, 2008. Decision.

Appellant is absent. Public Information Officer Shri S.A. Gite, Shirastedar, Sub Divisional Officer, Chiplun Sub Division is present. Case taken up on merits. First Appellate Authority has given a decision dated 24.12.2007. I am in general agreement with the same. The appeal concludes.

(Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 8th April, 2009.. - 24 - BEFORE THE STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION MAHARASHTRA – KONKAN REGION Appeal under Section 19(3) of RTI Act 2005. Appeal No.KR-1482/2008 Shri Gangadhar Yadav, ….. Appellant. Room No. 2, Sop Villa, Plot No. 6, Opp. Bank of Maharashtra, Above Hanuman Mandir,Shivaji Chowk, Kalyan (W), Dist : Thane. V/s. Public Information Officer, ….. Respondent Sub Registrar, Kalyan, Taluka : Kalyan, Dist : Thane.

The Appellate Authority, Joint District Registrar, Thane City, Vardhavat Mansion, Shivaji Path, Thane, Dist ; Thane.

Facts: A copy of the above appeal is annexed.

Interim Decision Appellant filed the first appeal u/s 19 (1) of the Right To Information Act but primafacie there is no decision by First Appellate Authority. I, therefore, remand this case to the First Appellate Authority for inviting and giving a hearing to the appellant for examining the points raised by him in his appeal with a view to provide maximum information if due under the act and give appellant better satisfaction by issuing a reasoned order. A compliance report should be sent within 45 days by the First Appellate Authority to me.

Sd/--- (Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 18th October, 2008. Decision

Appellant’s representative Shri J.B. Shah is present. Public Information Officer Shri M.L. Puralkar, Joint Sub Registrar, Kalyan and First Appellate Authority Shri R.D. Damkondwar, Joint District Registrar-Class-I, Thane (City) are present. Case discussed in great detail. First Appellate Authority had given a decision on 17.11.2007 with which I am in general agreement. No compliance report was sent by First Appellate Authority on the basis of previous Interim Decision. First Appellate Authority should be more careful in future. As far as present appeal is concerned it stands concluded.

(Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 8th April, 2009.

- 25 - BEFORE THE STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION MAHARASHTRA – KONKAN REGION Appeal under Section 19(3) of RTI Act 2005. Appeal No.KR- 1621/2008 Shri Sachhinand Kondaji Pachapute, ….. Appellant. At : M.H.B. 89/571, S.P. Nagar, Ambernath (W), : 421 501, Dist : Thane. V/s. Public Information Officer, ….. Respondent Shri Vighnahar Sugar Industries, At : Nivrutti Nagar, ( Dhalewadi), Post : Shiroli Bk., Taluka ; Junnar, District : Pune : 410 511.

The Appellate Authority, Shri Vighnahar Sugar Industries, At : Nivrutti Nagar, ( Dhalewadi), Post : Shiroli Bk., Taluka ; Junnar, District : Pune : 410 511.

Facts: A copy of the above appeal is annexed. Interim Decision Appellant filed the first appeal u/s 19 (1) of the Right To Information Act but primafacie there is no decision by First Appellate Authority. I, therefore, remand this case to the First Appellate Authority for inviting and giving a hearing to the appellant for examining the points raised by him in his appeal with a view to provide maximum information if due under the act and give appellant better satisfaction by issuing a reasoned order. A compliance report should be sent within 45 days by the First Appellate Authority to me.

Sd/--- (Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 19th September, 2008. Decision

Appellant is present. Representative of Public Information Officer, Shri S.K. Varpe, Shri Vighnahar Sugar Industries, Nivrutti Nagar, ( Dhalewadi), Post : Shiroli Bk., Taluka ; Junnar, District : Pune is present. Information has been provided by the Public Information Officer in the month of November, 2008. Which means considerable delay beyond 30 days. A show cause notice should be issued separately for Penal Action for this delay.

As far as information is concerned this appeal concludes.

(Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:-8th April, 2009 - 26 -

BEFORE THE STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION MAHARASHTRA – KONKAN REGION Appeal under Section 19(3) of RTI Act 2005. Appeal No.KR-376/2009

Shri Hiralal Ramnarayan Gupta, ….. Appellant Gupta Estate, Anand Koliwada, Mumbra, Taluka & District ; Thane.

V/s.

Public Information Officer, ….. Respondent Deputy Medical Health Officer, Thane Municipal Corporation, Pachapakhadi, Chandanwadi, Dr. Almeda Road, Thane.

The Appellate Authority, Medical Health Officer, Thane Municipal Corporation, Pachapakhadi, Chandanwadi, Dr. Almeda Road, Thane.

Facts: A copy of the above appeal is annexed.

Decision

Appellant is present. Public Information Officer Dr. Sadanand K. Waghchaure, Deputy Medical Health Officer, Thane Municipal Corporation is present.

First Appellate Authority has given a decision on 11.9.2008 with which I am in general agreement.

There is, however, an initial delay in supplying the information for which a notice should issue separately.

The appeal concludes.

(Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 9th April, 2009.

- 27 -

BEFORE THE STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION MAHARASHTRA – KONKAN REGION Appeal under Section 19(3) of RTI Act 2005. Appeal No.KR-351/2009

Shri Rajesh Shankardayal Kalwar, ….. Appellant Nana Master Nagar, Mudre Khurd, Taluka : Karjat, Dist : Raigad.

V/s.

Public Information Officer, ….. Respondent Tahsil Office, Karjat, Taluka Karjat, District : Raigad.

The Appellate Authority, Tahsildar, Karjat. Tahsil Office, Karjat, Taluka Karjat, District : Raigad.

Facts: A copy of the above appeal is annexed.

Decision

Appellant is present. He says that in this case he is aggrieved by delay. Original application was dated 25.6.2008, but no response was given till the First Appellate Authority gave a hearing and finally information was given on 17.10.2008. The then Public Information Officer

Shri Vikas Pawar, Awal Karkun (Supply), Tahsil Office, Karjat should explain why penal action should not be taken under Section 20 of the R.T.I. Act, 2005.

The appeal concludes as far as information is concerned.

(Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 9th April, 2009.

- 28 - BEFORE THE STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION MAHARASHTRA – KONKAN REGION Appeal under Section 19(3) of RTI Act 2005. Appeal No.KR- 1170/2008 Smt. Meera G. Khandagale, ….. Appellant. RH-4, P-5, Sector-6, Vashi, Navi Mumbai : V/s. Public Information Officer, ….. Respondent Assistant Commissioner of Police, Office of the Commissioner of Police, Navi Mumbai, C.B.D., Belapur, Navi Mumbai : 400 614.

The Appellate Authority, Assistant Commissioner of Police, Office of the Commissioner of Police, Navi Mumbai, C.B.D., Belapur, Navi Mumbai : 400 614.

Facts: A copy of the above appeal is annexed. Interim Decision

Appellant filed the first appeal u/s 19 (1) of the Right To Information Act but primafacie there is no decision by First Appellate Authority. I, therefore, remand this case to the First Appellate Authority for inviting and giving a hearing to the appellant for examining the points raised by him in his appeal with a view to provide maximum information if due under the act and give appellant better satisfaction by issuing a reasoned order. A compliance report should be sent within 45 days by the First Appellate Authority to me. Sd/--- (Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 6th January, 2009.

Decision

Appellant is present. Public Information Officer Shri M.S. Jadhav, Assistant Commissioner of Police( Administration), Navi Mumbai is present. Case discussed in great detail. Some information already been given. Public Information Officer should give more information about :- (a) No. of cases investigated, number of cases where charge-sheet filed, number of cases where conviction ordered. (b) No. of cases of Departmental Enquiry, number of cases where punishment given.

(Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 9th April, 2009.

- 29 -

BEFORE THE STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION MAHARASHTRA – KONKAN REGION Appeal under Section 19(3) of RTI Act 2005. Appeal No.KR-1948/2008

Shri Ramchandra Raghav Wakade, ….. Appellant House No. 592, Near Neelima Hotel, Alibag, Taluka : Alibag, District : Raigad.

V/s.

Public Information Officer, ….. Respondent Chief Officer, Alibag Municipal Council, Taluka : Alibag, Dist. : Raigad.

The Appellate Authority, Deputy Commissioner ( General Administrastion), Office of the Divisional Commissioner, Konkan Division, 1st floor, Konkan Bhavan, Navi Mumbai : 400 614.

Facts: A copy of the above appeal is annexed.

Decision

Appellant is present. Public Information Officer Shri V.D. Dake, Chief Officer, Alibag Municipal Council and First Appellate Authority Smt. Ujwala Bhagat, Leave Reserve Chief Officer, Nagar Palika Prashasan, Divisional Commissioner’s Office, Konkan Division, Navi Mumbai are present. Case discussed in great detail. It seems that all the information that was available has been given. There is, therefore, no need to interfere with the decision of First Appellate Authority dated 6.9.2009. The appellant has raised some issues about one building belonging to the Municipal Council. The Chief Officer should in due course look into these aspects in accordance with rules. This appeal concludes.

(Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 9th April, 2009.

- 30 - BEFORE THE STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION MAHARASHTRA – KONKAN REGION Appeal under Section 19(3) of RTI Act 2005. Appeal No.KR- 158/2008 Shri Prabhakar Bhimrao Dhotre, ….. Appellant Shri Laxmikeshav Secondary School, Kasop-Phanpos, Tal. & Dist. Ratnagiri. . V/s. Public Information Officer, ….. Respondent Education Department, (Secondary Division) Zilla Parishad, Sangli. Dist. Sangli.

The Appellate Authority, Education Officer, (Secondary) Zilla Parishad, Sangli. Dist. Sangli.

Facts: The appellant by an application dated 27.3.2007 asked information regarding MVAT Act 2002.

Interim Decision

Appellant is absent. Public Information Officer Shri N.B. Patil, Education Officer,

Secondary, Zilla Parishad, Sangli is present.

It is seen that, Education Officer (Zilla Parishad, Sangli), has submitted a report dated 10.2.2009 to Deputy Director of Education about the date of Birth of the appellant. A copy of the report has been sent to the appellant.

The appeal stands disposed.

(Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 9th April, 2009.

- 31 - ¸üÖ•µÖ ´ÖÖ×ÆüŸÖß †ÖµÖÖêÖ, ´ÖÆüÖ¸üÖÂ™Òü, úÖëúÖ ÖÓ›ü¯Ößšü µÖÖÓ“Öê ÃÖ´ÖÖê¸ü ´ÖÖ×ÆüŸÖß“ÖÖ †×¬ÖúÖ¸ü †×¬Ö×ÖµÖ´Ö 2005 “Öê ú»Ö´Ö 19(3) †¾ÖµÖê Û¾¤üŸÖßµÖ †×¯Ö»Ö. †×¯Ö»Ö Îú´ÖÖÓú : êú†Ö¸ü- 1911/2008 ÁÖß .¿Ö×¿ÖúÖÓŸÖ úÖôæû ¸üÖê›ü¯ÖÖ»Öú¸ü, ÁÖß.×¿Ö¾ÖÖÓÖÖ úÖê-†Öò¯Ö.ÆüÖî.ÃÖÖêÃÖÖµÖ™üß, †ê-302, ÃÖêŒ™ü¸ü ÖÓ.9, Ö×¾ÖÖ ¯ÖÖ¾Öê»Ö,×•Ö.¸üÖµÖÖ›ü. ... †×¯Ö»ÖúŸÖÖÔ ×¾Ö¹ý¬¤ü •ÖÖ ´ÖÖ×ÆüŸÖß †×¬ÖúÖ¸üß, ... ÃÖÖ´ÖÖê¾ÖÖ»Öê ¤ãüµµÖ´Ö ×Ö²ÖÓ¬Öú, ¯ÖÖ¾Öê»Ö-3 (¾ÖÖÔ-2), ×•Ö»ÆüÖ- ¸üÖµÖÖ›ü.

¯ÖÏ£Ö´Ö †×¯Ö»ÖßµÖ ¯ÖÏÖ×¬ÖúÖ¸üß, ÃÖÆü×Ö²ÖÓ¬Öú-(¾ÖÖÔ-1 (×Ö.ÁÖê), †×»Ö²ÖÖÖ, ×•Ö»ÆüÖ-¸üÖµÖÖ›ü. †ÓŸÖ×¸ü´Ö †Ö¤êü¿Ö

µÖÖÃŸÖ¾Ö, ÃÖ¤ü¸ü ¯ÖÏú¸üÖß ´Öß †ÃÖê ×Ö¤ìü¿Ö ¤êüŸÖÖê úß, ¯ÖÏ£Ö´Ö †×¯Ö»ÖßµÖ ¯ÖÏÖ×¬ÖúÖ¸üß µÖÖÓÖß †×¯Ö»ÖúŸÖÖÔ µÖÖÓÖÖ ÃÖãÖÖ¾ÖÖß“Öß ‹ú ÃÖÓ¬Öß ¤êü‰úÖ †×¯Ö»ÖúŸÖÖÔ µÖÖÓÖß Û¾¤üŸÖßµÖ †×¯Ö»ÖÖŸÖ ˆ¯ÖÛÃ£ÖŸÖ êú»Öê»µÖÖ ´ÖãªÖÓ“ÖÖ ×¾Ö“ÖÖ¸ü ú¸üµÖÖÓŸÖ µÖÖ¾ÖÖ ¾Ö •Ö¸ü ´ÖÖÖÖß êú»Öê»Öß ´ÖÖ×ÆüŸÖß ‹úÖ ¯ÖêÖÖ †×¬Öú •ÖÖ ´ÖÖ×ÆüŸÖß †×¬ÖúÖ-µÖÖÓ¿Öß ÃÖÓ²ÖÓ×¬ÖŸÖ †ÃÖê»Ö ŸÖ¸ü ŸµÖÖ ÃÖ¾ÖÖÕÖÖ ÃÖãÖÖ¾ÖÖßÃÖ ²ÖÖê»Ö¾ÖÖ¾Öê †Ö×Ö ŸµÖÖÖÓŸÖ¸ü †×¯Ö»ÖúŸÖÖÔ µÖÖÓÖß †×¯Ö»ÖÖŸÖ ˆ¯ÖÛÃ£ÖŸÖ êú»Öê»µÖÖ ´ÖãªÖÓ¾Ö¸ü ¯Ö×¸ü¯ÖãÖÔ ´ÖÖ×ÆüŸÖß, †×¬Ö×ÖµÖ´ÖÖŸÖß»Ö ŸÖ¸üŸÖã¤üßÖãÃÖÖ¸ü ˆ¯Ö»Ö²¬Ö ú¹ýÖ ¤êüµÖÖ“µÖÖ¥üÂ™üßÖê ¯ÖÏ£Ö´Ö †×¯Ö»ÖßµÖ ¯ÖÏÖ×¬ÖúÖ¸üß µÖÖÓÖß µÖÖ ¯ÖÏú¸üÖß ÃÖúÖ¸üÖ †Ö¤êü¿Ö ¯ÖÖ¸üßŸÖ ú¸üÖ¾ÖêŸÖ, •ÖêÖê ú¹ýÖ †×¯Ö»ÖúŸÖÖÔ µÖÖÓ“Öê ÃÖ´ÖÖ¬ÖÖÖ ÆüÖê‡Ô»Ö

ˆ¯Ö¸üÖêŒŸÖ ¯ÖÏ´ÖÖÖê êú»Öê»µÖÖ úÖµÖÔ¾ÖÖÆüß“ÖÖ úÖµÖÔ¯ÖæŸÖá †Æü¾ÖÖ»Ö 45 ×¤ü¾ÖÃÖÖÓŸÖ ¯ÖÏ£Ö´Ö †×¯Ö»ÖßµÖ ¯ÖÏÖ×¬ÖúÖ¸üß µÖÖÓÖß †ÖµÖÖêÖÖÃÖ ÃÖÖ¤ü¸ü ú¸üÖ¾ÖÖ.

ÃÖÖê²ÖŸÖ : ¾Ö¸üß»Ö ¯ÖÏ´ÖÖÖê. ÃÖÆüß/- úÖëúÖ ³Ö¾ÖÖ, ( Ö¾ÖßÖ ãú´ÖÖ¸ü ) ²Öê»ÖÖ¯Öæ¸ü, Ö¾Öß ´ÖãÓ²Ö‡Ô : 400 614. ¸üÖ•µÖ ´ÖÖ×ÆüŸÖß †ÖµÖãŒŸÖ, ×¤üÖÖÓú : 29 ×›üÃÖë²Ö¸ü, 2008. úÖëúÖ ÖÓ›ü¯Ößšü †Ö¤êü¿Ö

†×¯Ö»ÖÖ£Öá ˆ¯ÖÛÃ£ÖŸÖ. Ó•ÖÖ ´ÖÖ×ÆüŸÖß †×¬ÖúÖ¸üß ÁÖß´ÖŸÖß †Ó.†. ŸÖÖÓ¤üôêû, ÃÖÆüÖµµÖú ¤ãüµµÖ´Ö ×Ö²ÖÓ¬Öú ¾ÖÖÔ-2, ŸÖÃÖê“Ö ¯ÖÏ£Ö´Ö †×¯Ö»ÖßµÖ †×¬ÖúÖ¸üß, ‹´Ö.‹ÃÖ. Ö¯Öì, ÃÖÆüÖµµÖú ×•Ö»ÆüÖ ×Ö²ÖÓ¬Öú †×»Ö²ÖÖÖ ˆ¯ÖÛÃ£ÖŸÖ †ÖÆêüŸÖ. ÃÖÖÖê»Ö “Ö“ÖÖÔ —ÖÖ»Öß. ¯ÖÏ£Ö´Ö †×¯Ö»ÖßµÖ ¯ÖÏÖ×¬ÖúÖ¸üß µÖÖÓÖß ×¤üÖÖÓú 16/1/2009 ¸üÖê•Öß ×ÖÖÔµÖ ×¤ü»Öê»ÖÖ †ÖÆêü. ÃÖãÖÖ¾ÖÖß“µÖÖ ¤ü¸ü´µÖÖÖ †×¯Ö»ÖúŸµÖÖÔÃÖ †Ö¾Ö¿µÖú †ÃÖ»Öê»µÖÖ ¤üÃŸÖ‹ê¾Ö•ÖÖÓ“Öß ¯ÖÏŸÖ ¾Ö ¯Ö¡Ö ×¤üÖÖÓú 1/9/2008 “Öß ¯ÖÏŸÖ ˆ¯Ö»Ö²¬Ö ú¹ýÖ ×¤ü»Öß. †×¯Ö»Ö ÃÖÓ¯ÖãÂ™üÖŸÖ µÖêŸÖê.

úÖëúÖ ³Ö¾ÖÖ, ( Ö¾ÖßÖ ãú´ÖÖ¸ü ) ²Öê»ÖÖ¯Öæ¸ü, Ö¾Öß ´ÖãÓ²Ö‡Ô : 400 614. ¸üÖ•µÖ ´ÖÖ×ÆüŸÖß †ÖµÖãŒŸÖ, ×¤üÖÖÓú : 9 ‹×¯ÖÏ»Ö 2009. úÖëúÖ ÖÓ›ü¯Ößšü

- 32 -

BEFORE THE STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION MAHARASHTRA – KONKAN REGION Appeal under Section 19(3) of RTI Act 2005. Appeal No.KR-1923/2008

Shri Manohar Tukaram Halade, ….. Appellant 102, Sachin Co-op.Hsg., Society, 113, Model Town, J.P. Road, Andheri (W), Mumbai : 400 053.

V/s.

Public Information Officer, ….. Respondent Gram Sevak, Nathawade, Gram Panchayat, Nathawade, Taluka : Vaibhavwadi, Dist : Sindhudurg.

The Appellate Authority, Block Development Officer, Panchayat Samiti, Vaibhavwadi, Dist : Sindhudurg.

Facts: A copy of the above appeal is annexed.

†Ö¤êü¿Ö

†×¯Ö»ÖÖ£Öá ˆ¯ÖÛÃ£ÖŸÖ. •ÖÖ ´ÖÖ×ÆüŸÖß †×¬ÖúÖ¸üß ÁÖß Ö¤üÖ±ú, ÖÏÖ´Ö ×¾ÖúÖÃÖ †×¬ÖúÖ¸üß, ÖÖ¬Ö¾Ö›êü, ÓŸÖÖ»ÖãúÖ ¾Öî³Ö¾Ö¾ÖÖ›üß ŸÖÃÖê“Ö ¯ÖÏ£Ö´Ö †×¯Ö»ÖßµÖ †×¬ÖúÖ¸üß, ÁÖß †Ö¸ü.¾Æüß. ÖÖë¬Öôûß, úÖ †×¬ÖúÖ¸üß, ¯ÖÓ“ÖÖµÖŸÖ ÃÖ×´ÖŸÖß, ¾Öî³Ö¾Ö¾ÖÖ›üß ˆ¯ÖÛÃ£ÖŸÖ †ÖÆêüŸÖ. µÖÖ ¯ÖÏú¸üÖÖ²Ö§ü»Ö ÃÖÖÖê»Ö “Ö“ÖÖÔ —ÖÖ»Öß ¾Ö ¯ÖÏú¸üÖÖ“Öê úÖÖ¤ü¯Ö¡Ö ŸÖ¯ÖÖÃÖµÖÖÓŸÖ †Ö»Öê. •ÖÖ ´ÖÖ×ÆüŸÖß †Û¬ÖúÖ¸üß µÖÖÓ“Öêú›æüÖ ŸµÖÖÓ“Öê ÃŸÖ¸üÖ¾Ö¸ü †×³Ö»ÖêÖÖÓÖãÃÖÖ¸ü †×¬ÖúÖ-†×¬Öú ´ÖÖ×ÆüŸÖß ¤êüµÖÖ“Öê ¯ÖÏµÖŸÖ —ÖÖ»Öê»Öê †ÖÆêüŸÖ. ŸÖ£ÖÖ×¯Ö, •ÖÖ ´ÖÖ×ÆüŸÖß †×¬ÖúÖ¸üß µÖÖÓÖß ‹ú ×Ö×¸üÖÖ ¤êü‰úÖ úÖÓÆüß †×¬Öú ´ÖÖ×ÆüŸÖß ¤êüŸÖÖÓ µÖêŸÖ †ÃÖê»Ö ŸÖ¸ü ¯ÖÏµÖŸÖ ú¸üÖ¾ÖêŸÖ. †×¯Ö»Ö ÃÖÓ¯ÖãÂ™üÖŸÖ µÖêŸÖê.

- 33 -

BEFORE THE STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION MAHARASHTRA – KONKAN REGION Appeal under Section 19(3) of RTI Act 2005. Appeal No.KR-447 & 450/2009

Shri Sachhidanand Kondaji Pachapute, ….. Appellant. M.H.B. 89/571, S.P. Nagar, Ambarnath (W), District : Thane : 421 501..

V/s.

Public Information Officer, ….. Respondent Office Superintendent, Panchayat Samiti Office, Junner, Taluka ; Junner, District : Pune.

The Appellate Authority, Block Development Officer, Panchayat Samiti, Junner, Taluka ; Junner, District : Pune.

Facts:

A copy of the above appeal is annexed.

×ÖÖÔµÖ

†×¯Ö»ÖÖ£Öá ˆ¯ÖÛÃ£ÖŸÖ.

†×¯Ö»ÖÖÃÖÓÓ²ÖÓÓ¬Öß úÖÖ¤ü¯Ö¡ÖÖÓ“Öê †¾Ö»ÖÖêúÖ êú»µÖÖÖÓŸÖ¸ü Ã¯ÖÂ™ü ÆüÖêŸÖê úß, †×¯Ö»ÖúŸÖÖÔ Æêü ÁÖß ¯ÖãÓ›ü»Ößú ÃÖÖêÖã

¯ÖÖ“Ö¯ÖãŸÖê µÖÖÓ“µÖÖ ÃÖê¾ÖÖ ¯ÖãÛÃŸÖúÖÓŸÖß»Ö †ÃÖ»Öê»Öß ´ÖÖ×ÆüŸÖß ¯ÖÏÖ¯ŸÖ ú¹ý ‡Û“”ûŸÖÖŸÖ. Æüß ´ÖÖ×ÆüŸÖß ¾µÖŒŸÖßÖŸÖ Ã¾Ö¹ý¯ÖÖ“Öß †ÖÆêü ¾Ö

ÁÖß ¯Öã›Óü»Ößú ÃÖÖêÖã ¯ÖÖ“Ö¯ÖãŸÖê µÖÖÓÖß µÖÖ²Ö§ü»Ö Æü¸üúŸÖ ‘ÖêŸÖ»Öê»Öß †ÖÆêü †ÃÖê ¯ÖÏ£Ö´Ö †×¯Ö»ÖßµÖ ¯ÖÏÖ×¬ÖúÖ¸üß µÖÖÓ“µÖÖ ×¤üÖÖÓú 16/2/2009

¸üÖê•Öß“µÖÖ ×ÖÖÔµÖÖ¾Ö¹ýÖ ×¤üÃÖŸÖê. ´ÆüÖæÖ ´ÖÖ×ÆüŸÖß ¤êüÖê µÖÖêµÖ ÆüÖêÖÖ¸ü ÖÖÆüß.

¤üÖêÆüß †×¯Ö»Öê ÃÖÓ¯ÖãÂ™üÖŸÖ µÖêŸÖÖŸÖ.

úÖëúÖ ³Ö¾ÖÖ, ( Ö¾ÖßÖ ãú´ÖÖ¸ü ) ²Öê»ÖÖ¯Öæ¸ü, Ö¾Öß ´ÖãÓ²Ö‡Ô : 400 614. ¸üÖ•µÖ ´ÖÖ×ÆüŸÖß †ÖµÖãŒŸÖ, ×¤üÖÖÓú : 13 ‹×¯ÖÏ»Ö 2009. úÖëúÖ ÖÓ›ü¯Ößšü

- 34 -

BEFORE THE STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION MAHARASHTRA – KONKAN REGION Appeal under Section 19(3) of RTI Act 2005. Appeal No.KR-1832/2008

Shri Birpal Ramchandra Kashyap, ….. Appellant Dixit Niwas, Mor Bunglow, Agashi Road, Virar (W), Dist : Thane..

V/s.

Public Information Officer, ….. Respondent Virar Municipal Council, Virar, Taluka : Vasai, Dist : Thane.

The Appellate Authority, Administrative Officer, Virar Municipal Council, Virar, Taluka : Vasai, Dist : Thane.

Facts:

A copy of the above appeal is annexed.

†Ö¤êü¿Ö

†×¯Ö»ÖÖ£Öá ˆ¯ÖÛÃ£ÖŸÖ. Ó•ÖÖ ´ÖÖ×ÆüŸÖß †×¬ÖúÖ¸üß ÁÖß´ÖŸÖß ÛÃ´ÖŸÖÖ ¤ü. ³ÖÖê‡Ô¸ü, ¾Ö×¸üÂšü ×»Ö×¯Öú ˆ¯ÖÛÃ£ÖŸÖ †ÖÆêüŸÖ

¯ÖÏ£Ö´Ö †×¯Ö»ÖßµÖ ¯ÖÏÖ×¬ÖúÖ¸üß µÖÖÓÖß ×ÖÖÔµÖ ×¤ü»Öê»ÖÖ †ÖÆêü. ŸÖÖê µÖÖêµÖ ¾ÖÖ™üŸÖÖê.

†×¯Ö»Ö ÃÖÓ¯ÖãÂ™üÖŸÖ µÖêŸÖê.

- 35 -

BEFORE THE STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION MAHARASHTRA – KONKAN REGION Appeal under Section 19(3) of RTI Act 2005. Appeal No.KR-381/2009

Shri Mohan Dattatraya Chandan, ….. Appellant. C/o. Smt. S.R. Patange, 19, Pandurang Niwas,Hanuman Society, Nandivalu Rd., Dombivali (E), District : Thane : 421 201..

V/s.

Public Information Officer, ….. Respondent Secretary/Chairman, Ganesh Nagar Aadarsh Griha Nirman Mandal Ltd., Manda-Titwala, Taluka : Kalyan, Dist : Thane.

The Appellate Authority, Deputy Registrar, Co-operative Societies, Kalyan Taluka, Malhar Sankul Bldg.,1st floor, Near Moninder Singh High-School, Agra Road, Ghodekhot Ali, Kalyan (W), Dist : Thane.

Facts:

A copy of the above appeal is annexed.

×ÖÖÔµÖ

†×¯Ö»ÖÖ£Öá †Öã¯ÖÛÃ£ÖŸÖ. Ó•ÖÖ ´ÖÖ×ÆüŸÖß †×¬ÖúÖ¸üß ÁÖß ¯ÖÓ›üßŸÖ ÖÖ¸üÖµÖÖ ãúôûúÖá, ÃÖ×“Ö¾Ö ˆ¯ÖÛÃ£ÖŸÖ †ÖÆêüŸÖ

ÃÖ×“Ö¾Ö, ÖÖê¿ÖÖÖ¸ü †Ö¤ü¿ÖÔ ÖéÆü ×Ö´ÖÖÔÖ ÃÖÓÃ£ÖÖ µÖÖÓÖß †×¯Ö»ÖúŸµÖÖÔÃÖ ²ÖÓ¬Ö¯Ö¡ÖÖ“µÖÖ ¾ÆüÖ‰ú“ÖÃÖÔ“Öß ¯ÖÏŸÖ ´ÖÖê±úŸÖ,

¸ü×•ÖÃ™ü›Ôü ¯ÖÖêÃ™ü ‹. ›üß. ¾¤üÖ¸üÖ ¯ÖÖšü×¾ÖÖê“Öê ´ÖÖµÖ êú»Öê †ÖÆêü. ŸµÖÖ“Ö ¯ÖÏ´ÖÖÖê úÖµÖÔ¾ÖÖÆüß ¾ÆüÖ¾Öß.

†×¯Ö»Ö ÃÖÓ¯ÖãÂ™üÖŸÖ µÖêŸÖê.

- 36 -

BEFORE THE STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION MAHARASHTRA – KONKAN REGION Appeal under Section 19(3) of RTI Act 2005. Appeal No.KR- 341/2009

1. Shri Anwar M. Isahak Momin, ….. Appellant. 2. Shri Mansoor Ahamad Gulam Mustafa Momin, House No. 17, Jaitunpura, Bhiwandi, Taluka : Bhiwandi, District : Thane..

V/s.

Public Information Officer, ….. Respondent Senior Sanitary Inspector (Health), Bhiwandi-Nijampur City Municipal Corporation, Taluka : Bhiwandi, District : Thane.

The Appellate Authority, Deputy Municipal Commissioner, (H.Q.), Bhiwandi-Nijampur City Municipal Corporation, Taluka : Bhiwandi, District : Thane

Facts:

A copy of the above appeal is annexed.

Decision

Appellants are present. Public Information Officer Shri J.S. Khatib, Inspector, Bhiwandi-Nijampur City Municipal Corporation is present. Case has been discussed in great detail. the First Appellate Authority has already given a decision on 25.9.2008 which is upheld. The appeal concludes.

(Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 13th April, 2009.

- 37 - BEFORE THE STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION MAHARASHTRA – KONKAN REGION Appeal under Section 19(3) of RTI Act 2005. Appeal No.KR-366/2009

1. Shri Anwar M. Isahak Momin, ….. Appellant. House No. 17, Jaitunpura, Bhiwandi, Kotargate, Bhiwandi, Taluka : Bhiwandi, District : Thane..

V/s.

Public Information Officer, ….. Respondent City Development Officer, Bhiwandi-Nijampur City Municipal Corporation, Taluka : Bhiwandi, District : Thane.

The Appellate Authority, Deputy Municipal Commissioner (H.Q.), Bhiwandi-Nijampur City Municipal Corporation, Taluka : Bhiwandi, District : Thane.

Facts:

A copy of the above appeal is annexed.

×ÖÖÔµÖ

†×¯Ö»ÖÖ£Öá ˆ¯ÖÛÃ£ÖŸÖ. Ó

¯ÖÏ£Ö´Ö †×¯Ö»ÖßµÖ ¯ÖÏÖ×¬ÖúÖ¸üß µÖÖÓÖß ×¤üÖÖÓú 16/9/2008 ¸üÖê•Öß ×¤ü»Öê»ÖÖ ×ÖÖÔµÖ µÖÖêµÖ †ÖÆêü. µÖÖ ¯ÖÏú¸üÖÖŸÖ

´ÖÆüÖÖÖ¸ü ¯ÖÖ×»ÖêúÖê µÖÖêµÖ ŸÖß úÖµÖÔ¾ÖÖÆüß ú¸üÖ¾Öß.

†×¯Ö»Ö ÃÖÓ¯ÖãÂ™üÖŸÖ µÖêŸÖê.

- 38 -

BEFORE THE STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION MAHARASHTRA – KONKAN REGION Appeal under Section 19(3) of RTI Act 2005. Appeal No.KR- 678/2008

Shri Sanjeev Kumar Bansal, ….. Appellant 436, Pocket-2, Mayur Vihar, Phase-2, Delhi-11 0 091. . V/s. Public Information Officer, ….. Respondent City Industrial & Development Corpn. Ltd., CIDCO Bhavan, C.B.D.Belapur, Navi Mumbai-

The Appellate Authority, Chief Manager,(Administration) City Industrial & Development Corpn. Ltd., CIDCO Bhavan, C.B.D.Belapur, Navi Mumbai- 400 614.

Facts: A copy of the above appeal is annexed. Interim Decision Much time has passed since the original application was made and therefore, it would be necessary to know the present status of this case. I, therefore, remand this case to the First Appellate Authority for inviting and giving a hearing to the appellant for examining the points raised by him in his appeal with a view to provide maximum information if due under the act and give appellant better satisfaction by issuing a reasoned order. This may be done even if the First Appellate Authority may have given an earlier decision which would automatically stand modified by the First Appellate Authority’s new decision. A compliance report should be sent within 45 days by the First Appellate Authority to me.

Sd/--- (Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 20th August, 2008. Decision

Appellant is absent. First Appellate Authority Shri J.B. Khanvilkar, General Manager, CIDCO Ltd., is present.

It is seen that the First Appellate Authority has given a decision on 07.11.2008. Thereafter information has been supplied vide CIDCO’s letter of 04.12.2008.

The appeal concludes.

(Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:-15th April, 2009. - 39 -

BEFORE THE STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION MAHARASHTRA – KONKAN REGION Appeal under Section 19(3) of RTI Act 2005. Appeal No.KR-921 & 1843/2008 Shri Madan Damale, ….. Appellant At & Post ; Weral, Taluka : Khed, District : Ragnagiri : 415 621. V/s. Public Information Officer, ….. Respondent Sub Divisional Police Officer, Khed Sub Division, Dist : Ratnagiri.

The Appellate Authority, Superintendent of Police, Ratnagiri, District : Ratnagiri.

Facts: A copy of the above appeal is annexed.

Interim Decision Much time has passed since the original application was made and therefore, it would be necessary to know the present status of this case. I, therefore, remand this case to the First Appellate Authority for inviting and giving a hearing to the appellant for examining the points raised by him in his appeal with a view to provide maximum information if due under the act and give appellant better satisfaction by issuing a reasoned order. This may be done even if the First Appellate Authority may have given an earlier decision which would automatically stand modified by the First Appellate Authority’s new decision. A compliance report should be sent within 45 days by the First Appellate Authority to me.

Sd/--- (Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 8th July, 2008. Decision

Appellant is absent. Public Information Officer Smt. Namrate Ganesh Patil, Sub Divisional Police Officer, Khed is present.

First Appellate Authority has given a decision on 6.9.2008 with which I am in general agreement. This appeal concludes. Similarly this disposes off Appeal No. 1843 of the same appellant as the issues are same.

(Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 15th April, 2009.

- 40 - BEFORE THE STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION MAHARASHTRA – KONKAN REGION Appeal under Section 19(3) of RTI Act 2005. Appeal No.KR-34/2009

Shri Borse Jagdeep Himatrao, ….. Appellant C/0. Shri Goswami Devendra Amrut, A-Type, A-4/46, Near Gawaskar Maidan, Sector-2, C.B.D., Belapur, Navi Mumbai : 400 614.

V/s.

Public Information Officer, ….. Respondent Assistant Director, Directorate of Training and Vocational Education, Maharashtra State, 3, Mahapalika Marg, Post Box No. 10036, Mumbai : 400 001.

The Appellate Authority, Assistant Director, Directorate of Training and Vocational Education, Maharashtra State, 3, Mahapalika Marg, Post Box No. 10036, Mumbai : 400 001.

Facts: A copy of the above appeal is annexed.

Decision

Appellant is present. Public Information Officer Shri S.P.Nyayanit, Assistant Director and First Appellate Authority Shri R.T. Kamble, Deputy Director of Training and Vocational Education, Mumbai are present.

The First Appellate Authority has given a decision on issues raised in this appeal as well as the Appeal No. KR-1566/2008.

I am in general agreement with the decision.

The two appeals ( KR-34/2009 and KR-1566/2008) concludes.

(Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 15th April, 2009.

BEFORE THE STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION MAHARASHTRA – KONKAN REGION Appeal under Section 19(3) of RTI Act 2005. - 41 - Appeal No.KR-441/2009

Shri Shivanand R. Ankolekar, ….. Appellant A-8, M.I.D.C.,Flatted Factory, L.B.S. Marg, Wagle Estate, Thane (W), District : Thane : 400 604.

V/s.

Public Information Officer, ….. Respondent Area Manager (1), M.I.D.C., Thane Region, Thane (W) District : Thane : 400 604.

The Appellate Authority, Regional Officer, M.I.D.C., Thane Region, Thane (W) District : Thane : 400 604.

Facts: A copy of the above appeal is annexed.

×ÖÖÔµÖ

†×¯Ö»ÖÖ£Öá †Öã¯ÖÛÃ£ÖŸÖ. •ÖÖ ´ÖÖ×ÆüŸÖß †×¬ÖúÖ¸üß ÁÖß ‹ÃÖ.›üß. ´Ö¤üÖê, Öê¡Ö ¾µÖ¾ÖÃ£ÖÖ¯Öú, ´ÖÆüÖ¸üÖÂ™Òü †ÖîªÖê×Öú ×¾ÖúÖÃÖ ´ÖÆüÖ´ÖÓ›üôû úÖµÖÖÔ»ÖµÖ, šüÖÖê ˆ¯ÖÛÃ£ÖŸÖ †ÖÆêüŸÖ. úÖÖ¤ü¯Ö¡Öê ŸÖ¯ÖÖÃÖµÖÖÓŸÖ †Ö»Öß. ¯ÖÏ£Ö´Ö †×¯Ö»ÖßµÖ ¯ÖÏÖ×¬ÖúÖ¸üß µÖÖÓÖß ×¤üÖÖÓú 29/1/2009 ¸üÖê•Öß ×¤ü»Öê»ÖÖ ×ÖÖÔµÖ µÖÖêµÖ ¾ÖÖ™üŸÖÖê. †×¯Ö»Ö ÃÖÓ¯ÖãÂ™üÖŸÖ µÖêŸÖê.

úÖëúÖ ³Ö¾ÖÖ, ( Ö¾ÖßÖ ãú´ÖÖ¸ü ) ²Öê»ÖÖ¯Öæ¸ü, Ö¾Öß ´ÖãÓ²Ö‡Ô : 400 614. ¸üÖ•µÖ ´ÖÖ×ÆüŸÖß †ÖµÖãŒŸÖ, ×¤üÖÖÓú : 15 ‹×¯ÖÏ»Ö 2009. úÖëúÖ ÖÓ›ü¯Ößšü

BEFORE THE STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION MAHARASHTRA – KONKAN REGION Appeal under Section 19(3) of RTI Act 2005. Appeal No.KR-383/2009 - 42 -

Shri Hareshwar Daji Parab, ….. Appellant 3, Vishal Niwas, Behind Rajaram Patil Chawl, Atali Gaon, Kalyan, Taluka : Kalyan, District : Thane 421 102.

V/s.

Public Information Officer, ….. Respondent Head Health Inspector, Kalyan-Dombivali Municipal Corporation, A-Prabhag Area, Vadvali, Taluka : Kalyan, District : Thane.

The Appellate Authority, Ward Officer, A-Ward Area, Kalyan-Dombivali Municipal Corporation, Taluka : Kalyan, District : Thane.

Facts: A copy of the above appeal is annexed.

†Ö¤êü¿Ö

†×¯Ö»ÖÖ£Öá ˆ¯ÖÛÃ£ÖŸÖ. •ÖÖ ´ÖÖ×ÆüŸÖß †×¬ÖúÖ¸üß ÁÖß †ÖÖÃŸÖßÖ ‘Öã™êü, ¯ÖÏ. ¯ÖÏ´ÖãÖ †Ö¸üÖêµÖ ×Ö×¸üÖú ŸÖÃÖê“Ö ¯ÖÏ£Ö´Ö †×¯Ö»ÖßµÖ ¯ÖÏÖ×¬ÖúÖ¸üß ÁÖß ÃÖÓ•ÖµÖ •ÖÖ¬Ö¾Ö, ¯ÖÏ³ÖÖÖ Öê¡Ö †×¬ÖúÖ¸üß, †-¯ÖÏ³ÖÖÖ, ú»µÖÖÖ-›üÖêØ²Ö¾Ö»Öß ´ÖÆüÖÖÖ¸ü ¯ÖÖ×»ÖúÖ ˆ¯ÖÛÃ£ÖŸÖ †ÖÆêüŸÖ. ÃÖÖÖê»Ö “Ö“ÖÖÔ —ÖÖ»Öß. †×¯Ö»ÖúŸµÖÖÔÃÖ ¯ÖÏµÖÖÔ¯ŸÖ ´ÖÖ×ÆüŸÖß ¯Öã¸ü×¾ÖµÖÖÓŸÖ †Ö»Öê»Öß †ÖÆêü. ´ÖÖ×ÆüŸÖß ŸÖßÖ ÃÖÓÖÖúÖ¾Ö¸ü ™Óüú×»Ö×ÖŸÖ êú»Öê»µÖÖ ¯ÖéÂ™üÖÓ“Öß †ÖÆêü ¾Ö ŸµÖÖú¸üßŸÖÖÓ ¹ý¯ÖµÖê 45/- ¿Öã»ú ‘ÖêµÖÖÓŸÖ †Ö»Öê»Öê †ÖÆêü. µÖÖ ÃÖÓ²ÖÓ¬Öß“Öê ´ÖÆüÖÖÖ¸ü ¯ÖÖ×»Öêú“Öê ¯Ö×¸ü¯Ö¡Öú †×¯Ö»ÖúŸµÖÖÔÃÖ ˆ¯Ö»Ö²¬Ö ú¹ýÖ ×¤ü»Öê •ÖÖ‡Ô»Ö, †µÖ£ÖÖ, ¹ý¯ÖµÖê 39/- ¯Ö¸üŸÖ êú»Öê •ÖÖŸÖß»Ö †ÃÖê •ÖÖ ´ÖÖ×ÆüŸÖß †×¬ÖúÖ¸üß µÖÖÓÖß ´ÖÖµÖ êú»Öê. †×¯Ö»Ö ÃÖÓ¯ÖãÂ™üÖŸÖ µÖêŸÖê.

BEFORE THE STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION MAHARASHTRA – KONKAN REGION Appeal under Section 19(3) of RTI Act 2005. Appeal No.KR-1973/2008

- 43 -

Shri Santosh Bhiku Kurankar, ….. Appellant. Office of the Chief Engineer, Brihan Mumbai Municipal Corporation, Shri Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj Mandai Bldg., Mata Ramabai Ambedkar Marg, 4th floor, Paltan Road, Mumbai : 400 001. . V/s.

Public Information Officer, ….. Respondent Tahsil Office, Shrivardhan, Taluka : Shiravardhan, District : Raigad.

The Appellate Authority, Tahsildar, Shrivardhan, Tahsil Office, Shrivardhan, Taluka : Shiravardhan, District : Raigad.

Facts : A copy of the above appeal is annexed

×ÖÖÔµÖ

†×¯Ö»ÖÖ£Öá ˆ¯ÖÛÃ£ÖŸÖ.

¯ÖÏ£Ö´Ö †×¯Ö»ÖßµÖ ¯ÖÏÖ×¬ÖúÖ¸üß µÖÖÓÖß ×¤üÖÖÓú 14/8/2008 ¸üÖê•Öß ÃÖ´ÖµÖÖµÖßú ×ÖÖÔµÖ ×¤ü»Öê»ÖÖ †ÖÆêü ŸÖÖê µÖÖêµÖ ¾ÖÖ™üŸÖÖê.

†×¯Ö»Ö ÃÖÓ¯ÖãÂ™üÖŸÖ µÖêŸÖê.

úÖëúÖ ³Ö¾ÖÖ, ( Ö¾ÖßÖ ãú´ÖÖ¸ü ) ²Öê»ÖÖ¯Öæ¸ü, Ö¾Öß ´ÖãÓ²Ö‡Ô : 400 614. ¸üÖ•µÖ ´ÖÖ×ÆüŸÖß †ÖµÖãŒŸÖ, ×¤üÖÖÓú : 21 ‹×¯ÖÏ»Ö, 2009. úÖëúÖ ÖÓ›ü¯Ößš

BEFORE THE STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION MAHARASHTRA KONKAN REGION Appeal under Section 19(3) of RTI Act 2005. Appeal No./ KR- 348 /09 - 44 -

Shri Suresh G. Sharma, ….. Appellant Garden View Building, B-103, Viratnagar,Virar(West), Taluka Vasai, Dist:- Thane.

V/s

Public Information Officer … .. Respondent Deputy Director, Correspondence Training Scheme, Maharashtra State Educational Research & Training Council, Pune-30.

The Appellate Authority, Correspondence Training Scheme, Maharashtra State Educational Research & Training Council, Pune-30.

Facts : Please see Appeal application annexed.

×ÖÖÔµÖ

†×¯Ö»ÖÖ£Öá ˆ¯ÖÛÃ£ÖŸÖ. ¯ÖÏ£Ö´Ö †×¯Ö»ÖßµÖ †×¬ÖúÖ¸üß ÁÖß ‹. †Ö¸ü. ¸üÖ•ÖÖã¹ý, ¯ÖÏ. ÃÖÆü ÃÖÓ“ÖÖ»Öú, †Ö×Ö •ÖÖ ´ÖÖ×ÆüŸÖß †×¬ÖúÖ¸üß ÁÖß ¸üÖ.ÖÖ. •ÖÖ¬Ö¾Ö, ˆ¯Ö ÃÖÓ“ÖÖ»Öú, ´ÖÆüÖ¸üÖÂ™Òü ¸üÖ•µÖ ¿ÖîÖ×Öú ÃÖÓ¿ÖÖê¬ÖÖ ¾Ö ¯ÖÏ×¿ÖÖÖ ¯Ö×¸üÂÖ¤ü, ¯ÖãÖê ˆ¯ÖÛÃ£ÖŸÖ †ÖÆêüŸÖ. ¯ÖÏ£Ö´Ö †×¯Ö»ÖßµÖ †×¬ÖúÖ¸üß µÖÖÓÖß ×¤üÖÖÓú 7/10/2008 ¸üÖê•Öß ×ÖÖÔµÖ ×¤ü»Öê»ÖÖ †ÖÆêü ¾Ö ÃÖ¤ü¸ü ×ÖÖÔµÖ µÖÖêµÖ ×¤üÃÖŸÖ †ÖÆêü. †×¯Ö»Ö ÃÖÓ¯ÖãÂ™üÖŸÖ µÖêŸÖê.

BEFORE THE STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION MAHARASHTRA – KONKAN REGION Appeal under Section 19(3) of RTI Act 2005. Appeal No.KR-370/2008 Smt. Sangita Raymond Gonsalvis, ….. Appellant Sutarbhat Saloli, Girij, Post- Vasai, - 45 - District-Thane-401 201. V/s. Public Information Officer, ….. Respondent Chief Administrator, CIDCO Corporation, Vasai Road (E), Post-Navghar, Dist-Thane-401201.

The Appellate Authority, Additional Chief Planner (NT), CIDCO Bhavan, C. B. D.-Belapur, Navi Mumbai-400 614

†×¯Ö»ÖÖ£Öá †Öã¯ÖÛÃ£ÖŸÖ. ¯ÖÏ£Ö´Ö †×¯Ö»ÖßµÖ †×¬ÖúÖ¸üß ÁÖß ×ú¸üÖ †Ó. Ø¿Ö¤êü,†×ŸÖ×¸üŒŸÖ ´ÖãµÖ ×ÖµÖÖê•ÖÖúÖ¸ü, ×ÃÖ›üúÖê ´ÖµÖÖÔ×¤üŸÖ ŸÖÃÖê“Ö •ÖÖ ´ÖÖ×ÆüŸÖß †×¬ÖúÖ¸üß ÁÖß´ÖŸÖß ´Öê¬ÖÖ •Ö. »Ö¾ÖÓ¤êü, ¯ÖÏ¿ÖÖÃÖú (¾Ö.×¾Ö.) ˆ¯ÖÛÃ£ÖŸÖ †ÖÆêüŸÖ. ¯ÖÏ£Ö´Ö †×¯Ö»ÖßµÖ †×¬ÖúÖ¸üß µÖÖÓÖß ×¤üÖÖÓú 26/03/2009 ¸üÖê•Öß ×ÖÖÔµÖ ×¤ü»Öê»ÖÖ †ÖÆêü ŸÖÖê µÖÖêµÖ ¾ÖÖ™üŸÖÖê. µÖÖ ×ÖÖÔµÖÖÖãÃÖÖ¸ü †ÖÖ×¬ÖéúŸÖ ²ÖÖÓ¬ÖúÖ´Ö ¯ÖÖ›üµÖÖÃÖÓ²ÖÓ¬Öß •Öß úÖµÖÔ¾ÖÖÆüß —ÖÖ»Öß †ÃÖê»Ö ŸµÖÖ ÃÖÓ²ÖÓ¬Öß“Öß ´ÖÖ×ÆüŸÖß †×¯Ö»ÖúŸµÖÖÔÃÖ úôû¾ÖÖ¾Öß. †×¯Ö»Ö ÃÖÓ¯ÖãÂ™üÖŸÖ µÖêŸÖê.

úÖëúÖ ³Ö¾ÖÖ, ( Ö¾ÖßÖ ãú´ÖÖ¸ü ) ²Öê»ÖÖ¯Öæ¸ü, Ö¾Öß ´ÖãÓ²Ö‡Ô : 400 614. ¸üÖ•µÖ ´ÖÖ×ÆüŸÖß †ÖµÖãŒŸÖ, ×¤üÖÖÓú : 21 ‹×¯ÖÏ»Ö, 2009. úÖëúÖ ÖÓ›ü¯Ößš ¸üÖ•µÖ ´ÖÖ×ÆüŸÖß †ÖµÖÖêÖ, ´ÖÆüÖ¸üÖÂ™Òü, úÖëúÖ ÖÓ›ü¯Ößšü µÖÖÓ“Öê ÃÖ´ÖÖê¸ü ´ÖÖ×ÆüŸÖß“ÖÖ †×¬ÖúÖ¸ü †×¬Ö×ÖµÖ´Ö 2005 “Öê ú»Ö´Ö 19(3) †¾ÖµÖê Û¾¤üŸÖßµÖ †×¯Ö»Ö. †×¯Ö»Ö Îú´ÖÖÓú : êú†Ö¸ü-1928 /2008 ÁÖß ¾ÖÃÖÓŸÖ ÖÖ‰ú ´ÆüÖ¡Öê, ... †×¯Ö»ÖúŸÖÖÔ ¸üÖ.¸üÖÓ•ÖÖÖê»Öß, ¯ÖÖê. ¤üÖÓ. ›êüú¸ü¾ÖÖ›üß,

- 46 - ÓŸÖÖ»ÖãúÖ : ×³Ö¾ÖÓ›üß, ×•Ö»ÆüÖ : šüÖÖê. ×¾Ö¹ý¬¤ü •ÖÖ ´ÖÖ×ÆüŸÖß †×¬ÖúÖ¸üß, ... ÃÖÖ´ÖÖê¾ÖÖ»Öê ÃÖÆüÖµµÖú ¯ÖÖê»ÖßÃÖ †ÖµÖãŒŸÖ, ¯Öæ¾ÖÔ ×¾Ö³ÖÖÖ, ŸÖÖ»ÖãúÖ ×³Ö¾ÖÓ›üß, ×•Ö»ÆüÖ : šüÖÖê.

¯ÖÏ£Ö´Ö †×¯Ö»ÖßµÖ ¯ÖÏÖ×¬ÖúÖ¸üß, ¯ÖÖê»ÖßÃÖ ˆ¯Ö †ÖµÖãŒŸÖ, ¯Ö×¸ü´ÖÓ›üôû-2, ×³Ö¾ÖÓ›üß, ŸÖÆü×ÃÖ»Ö úÖµÖÖÔ»ÖµÖ, ×³Ö¾ÖÓ›üß •Ö¾Öôû, ŸÖÖ»ÖãúÖ : ×³Ö¾ÖÓ›üß, ×•Ö»ÆüÖ šüÖÖê. †ÓŸÖ×¸ü´Ö †Ö¤êü¿Ö ¯ÖÏ£Ö´Ö †×¯Ö×»ÖµÖ †×¬ÖúÖ¸üß µÖÖÓÖß µÖÖ ¯ÖÏú¸üÖÖŸÖ ×ÖÖÔµÖ ×¤ü»µÖÖ“Öê ×¤üÃÖæÖ µÖêŸÖê. ŸÖ£ÖÖ×¯Ö, ÃÖ¤ü¸ü ×ÖÖÔµÖÖÖê †×¯Ö»ÖúŸµÖÖÔ“Öê ÃÖ´ÖÖ¬ÖÖÖ —ÖÖ»Öê ÖÃÖ»µÖÖ´Öãôêû ŸµÖÖÓÖß ú»Ö´Ö 19 (3) †¾ÖµÖê Û¾¤üŸÖßµÖ †×¯Ö»Ö ¤üÖÖ»Ö êú»Öê †ÖÆêü (¯ÖÏŸÖ ÃÖÖê²ÖŸÖ ÃÖÓ»ÖÖ). †×¯Ö»ÖúŸÖÖÔ µÖÖÓÖß ¾ÖÃŸÖãÛÃ£ÖŸÖß¤ü¿ÖÔú ´ÖÖ×ÆüŸÖß“Öß ´ÖÖÖÖß êú»Öê»Öß †ÖÆêü. ´Ö»ÖÖ †ÃÖê ¾ÖÖ™üŸÖê úß, ¯ÖÏ£Ö´Ö †×¯Ö»ÖßµÖ †×¬ÖúÖ¸üß µÖÖÓÖß †×¯Ö»ÖúŸÖÖÔ µÖÖÓ“Öê¿Öß ¯ÖãÆüÖ ‹ú¤üÖ “Ö“ÖÖÔ/×¾Ö“ÖÖ¸ü ×¾Ö×Ö´ÖµÖ ú¹ýÖ •ÖÖÃŸÖßŸÖ •ÖÖÃŸÖ ´ÖÖ×ÆüŸÖß ¤êüµÖÖÃÖÓ¤ü³ÖÖÔŸÖ ¯ÖÏµÖŸÖ êú»µÖÖÃÖ ¾Ö ŸµÖÖ´Öãôêû †×¯Ö»ÖúŸµÖÖÔ“Öê ÃÖ´ÖÖ¬ÖÖÖ —ÖÖ»Öê ŸÖ¸ü †ÖµÖÖêÖÖú›êü µÖêµÖÖú¸üßŸÖÖÓ ÃÖ¾ÖÔ ¯ÖÖúÖ¸üÖÓ“ÖÖ ¾Öêôû, ¯ÖÏ¾ÖÖÃÖ Ö“ÖÔ ¾Ö ŸµÖÖ´Öãôêû ŸµÖÖÓÖÖ ÆüÖêÖÖ¸üß ŸÖÃÖ¤üß ™üÖôûŸÖÖ µÖêŸÖß»Ö. µÖÖÃŸÖ¾Ö, ´Öß Æêü †×¯Ö»Ö ¯ÖÏ£Ö´Ö †×¯Ö»ÖßµÖ ¯ÖÏÖ×¬ÖúÖ¸üß µÖÖÓ“Öêú›êü ×¸ü´ÖÖÓ›ü ú¸üßŸÖ †ÖÆêü. ŸµÖÖÓÖß †×¯Ö»ÖúŸÖÖÔ µÖÖÓÖÖ ¯ÖãÆüÖ ÃÖãÖÖ¾ÖÖß“Öß ‹ú ÃÖÓ¬Öß ¤êü‰úÖ †×¯Ö»ÖúŸÖÖÔ µÖÖÓÖß ˆ¯ÖÛÃ£ÖŸÖ êú»Öê»µÖÖ ´ÖãªÖÓ“ÖÖ ×¾Ö“ÖÖ¸ü ú¸üµÖÖÓŸÖ µÖÖ¾ÖÖ ¾Ö ¿ÖŒµÖŸÖÖê ¯Ö×¸ü¯ÖãÖÔ ´ÖÖ×ÆüŸÖß ¤êüµÖÖ“µÖÖ¥üÂ™üßÖê úÖµÖÔ¾ÖÖÆüß ú¸üÖ¾Öß ¾Ö µÖÖ ¯ÖÏú¸üÖß ÃÖ´ÖµÖÖµÖßú †Ö¤êü¿Ö ¯ÖÖ×¸üŸÖ ú¸üÖ¾ÖêŸÖ, •ÖêÖê ú¹ýÖ †×¯Ö»ÖúŸÖÖÔ µÖÖÓ“Öê ÃÖ´ÖÖ¬ÖÖÖ ÆüÖê‡Ô»Ö. ¯ÖÏ£Ö´Ö †×¯Ö»ÖßµÖ ¯ÖÏÖ×¬ÖúÖ¸üß µÖÖÓÖß µÖÖ ÃÖÓ¤ü³ÖÖÔŸÖ µÖÖ¯Öã¾Öá †Ö¤êü¿Ö ×ÖÖÔ×´ÖŸÖ êú»Öê †ÃÖ»Öê ŸÖ¸üß ˆ¯Ö¸üÖêŒŸÖ ¯ÖÏ´ÖÖÖê úÖµÖÔ¾ÖÖÆüß ú¹ýÖ Ö¾µÖÖÖê †Ö¤êü¿Ö ¯ÖÖ¸üßŸÖ ú¸üÖ¾ÖêŸÖ, ´ÆüÖ•Öê ŸµÖÖÓ“ÖÖ µÖÖ¯Öã¾Öá“ÖÖ ×ÖÖÔµÖ †Ö¯ÖÖê†Ö¯Ö ÃÖã¬ÖÖ¸üßŸÖ ÆüÖê‡Ô»Ö. ˆ¯Ö¸üÖêŒŸÖ ¯ÖÏ´ÖÖÖê êú»Öê»µÖÖ úÖµÖÔ¾ÖÖÆüß“ÖÖ úÖµÖÔ¯ÖæŸÖá †Æü¾ÖÖ»Ö 45 ×¤ü¾ÖÃÖÖÓŸÖ ¯ÖÏ£Ö´Ö †×¯Ö»ÖßµÖ ¯ÖÏÖ×¬ÖúÖ¸üß µÖÖÓÖß †ÖµÖÖêÖÖÃÖ ÃÖÖ¤ü¸ü ú¸üÖ¾ÖÖ. ŸÖ£ÖÖ×¯Ö, •Ö¸ü ¯ÖÏ£Ö´Ö †×¯Ö»ÖßµÖ †×¬ÖúÖ¸üß µÖÖÓ“Öß †¿Öß šüÖ´Ö ¬ÖÖ¸üÖÖ †ÃÖê»Ö úß, Û¾¤üŸÖßµÖ ÃÖãÖÖ¾ÖÖß ¤êü‰úÖ úÖÓÆüß ÃÖÖ¬µÖ ÆüÖêÖÖ¸ü ÖÖÆüß. ŸÖ¸ü ŸµÖÖÓÖß •ÖÖê›ü»Öê»µÖÖ †×¯Ö»Ö †•ÖÖÔŸÖ ˆ¯ÖÛÃ£ÖŸÖ êú»Öê»µÖÖ ´ÖãªÖÓ¾Ö¸ü ´Öã§êü×ÖÆüÖµÖ ÃÖ×¾ÖÃŸÖ¸ü †×³Ö¯ÖÏÖµÖ 15 ×¤ü¾ÖÃÖÖÓŸÖ †ÖµÖÖêÖÖÃÖ ÃÖÖ¤ü¸ü ú¸üÖ¾ÖÖ.

ÃÖÆüß/- úÖëúÖ ³Ö¾ÖÖ, ( Ö¾ÖßÖ ãú´ÖÖ¸ü ) ²Öê»ÖÖ¯Öæ¸ü, Ö¾Öß ´ÖãÓ²Ö‡Ô : 400 614. ¸üÖ•µÖ ´ÖÖ×ÆüŸÖß †ÖµÖãŒŸÖ, ×¤üÖÖÓú : 16 ×›üÃÖë²Ö¸ü, 2008. úÖëúÖ ÖÓ›ü¯Ößšü ×ÖÖÔµÖ

†×¯Ö»ÖÖ£Öá ˆ¯ÖÛÃ£ÖŸÖ. •ÖÖ ´ÖÖ×ÆüŸÖß †×¬ÖúÖ¸üß ÁÖß ‹ÃÖ.‹Ö. •ÖÖ¬Ö¾Ö, ÃÖÆüÖµµÖú ¯ÖÖê»ÖßÃÖ †ÖµÖãŒŸÖ, ×³Ö¾ÖÓ›üß ¯Öã¾ÖÔ ×¾Ö³ÖÖÖ ˆ¯ÖÛÃ£ÖŸÖ †ÖÆêüŸÖ. ¯ÖÏ£Ö´Ö †×¯Ö»ÖßµÖ ¯ÖÏÖ×¬ÖúÖ¸üß µÖÖÓÖß ×¤üÖÖÓú 22/1/2009 ¸üÖê•Öß ×ÖÖÔµÖ ×¤ü»Öê»ÖÖ †ÖÆêü ŸÖÖê µÖÖêµÖ †ÖÆêü. †×¯Ö»ÖúŸµÖÖÔÃÖ ´ÖÖ×ÆüŸÖß ¯ÖÏÖ¯ŸÖ —ÖÖ»Öê»Öß †ÖÆêü.

†×¯Ö»Ö ÃÖÓ¯ÖãÂ™üÖŸÖ µÖêŸÖê.

úÖëúÖ ³Ö¾ÖÖ, ( Ö¾ÖßÖ ãú´ÖÖ¸ü ) ²Öê»ÖÖ¯Öæ¸ü, Ö¾Öß ´ÖãÓ²Ö‡Ô : 400 614. ¸üÖ•µÖ ´ÖÖ×ÆüŸÖß †ÖµÖãŒŸÖ, ×¤üÖÖÓú : 21 ‹×¯ÖÏ»Ö, 2009. úÖëúÖ ÖÓ›ü¯Ößš BEFORE THE STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION MAHARASHTRA – KONKAN REGION Appeal under Section 19(3) of RTI Act 2005. Appeal No.KR-1801/2008

- 47 - Shri Naresh Tahilramani, ….. Appellant. Flat No. 203, Gokuldham Society, Behind Prakash Foot Centre, Netaji Road, Ulhasnagar : 4 ( District : Thane ). . V/s.

Public Information Officer, ….. Respondent Executive Engineer, Public Works Department, Ulhasnagar Municipal Corporation, Ulhasnagar : 3, District : Thane.

The Appellate Authority, Executive Engineer, Public Works Department, Ulhasnagar Municipal Corporation, Ulhasnagar : 3, District : Thane.

Facts : A copy of the above appeal is annexed.

Decision

Appellant is absent. Public Information Officer Shri Ramesh B. Shirke, Executive Engineer, Ulhasnagar Municipal Corporation, Ulhasnagar is present.

The appeal is mainly about contradictory information given to the appellant and his son-in-law for the same question. Copy of the explanation sent by the Public Information Officer vide letter dated 25th November, 2008 may be sent to the appellant. The Public Information Officer should be more careful in these matters.

This appeal concludes. The Complaint No. 324/2008 stands disposed.

(Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 21st April,2009.

BEFORE THE STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION MAHARASHTRA – KONKAN REGION Appeal under Section 19(3) of RTI Act 2005. Appeal No.KR-1964/2008

- 48 -

Shri Ninad Gajanan Salavkar, ….. Appellant. Manore Bldg., 2nd floor, Near Datta Mandir, Dev Ali, Pen, Taluka : Pen, District : Raigad. . V/s.

Public Information Officer, ….. Respondent Deputy Superintendent of Police, Office of the Superintendent of Police, Raigad-Alibag.

The Appellate Authority, Deputy Superintendent of Police, Office of the Superintendent of Police, Raigad-Alibag.

Facts : A copy of the above appeal is annexed.

×ÖÖÔµÖ

†×¯Ö»ÖÖ£Öá ˆ¯ÖÛÃ£ÖŸÖ.

¯ÖÏ£Ö´Ö †×¯Ö»ÖßµÖ ¯ÖÏÖ×¬ÖúÖ¸üß µÖÖÓÖß ×¤üÖÖÓú 15/9/2008 ¸üÖê•Öß ×ÖÖÔµÖ ×¤ü»Öê»ÖÖ †ÖÆêü ŸÖÖê µÖÖêµÖ ¾ÖÖ™üŸÖÖê.

†×¯Ö»Ö ÃÖÓ¯ÖãÂ™üÖŸÖ µÖêŸÖê.

BEFORE THE STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION MAHARASHTRA – KONKAN REGION Appeal under Section 19(3) of RTI Act 2005. Appeal No.KR-2562/2008 - 49 - Shri Jaywant Ganpat Jadhav, ….. Appellant. At: Kumbharshiv, Post : Vadvali, Taluka ; Bhiwandi, District : Thane : V/s. Public Information Officer, ….. Respondent Extension Officer, (Gram Panchayat), Panchayat Samiti, Bhiwandi, Tal ; Bhiwandi, Dist ; Thane.

The Appellate Authority, Block Development Officer, Panchayat Samiti, Bhiwandi, Tal : Bhiwandi, Dist : Thane.

Facts: A copy of the above appeal is annexed.

Interim Decision It would be necessary to know the present status of this case. Appellant filed the first appeal u/s 19 (1) of the Right To Information Act but primafacie there is no decision By First Appellate Authority. I, therefore, remand this case to the First Appellate Authority for inviting and giving a hearing to the appellant for examining the points raised by him in his appeal with a view to provide maximum information if due under the act and give appellant better satisfaction by issuing a reasoned order. A compliance report should be sent within 45 days by the First Appellate Authority to me. Sd/--- (Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 19th July, 2008. Decision

Appellant is present. Public Information Officer Shri Santosh Belkede, Extension Officer, Gram Panchayat, Panchayat Samiti, Bhwandi and First Appellate Authority Shri M.S. Sawadkar, Block Development Officer, P.S. Bhiwandi are present. All information has been given to the appellant. First Appellate Authority will enquire into the reasons for delay and submit his recommendation for punitive action within 15 days. The appeal concludes.

Konkan Bhavan, (Navin Kumar) Belapur, Navi Mumbai. State Information Commissioner Date:- 21st April, 2009. Konkan Region BEFORE THE STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION MAHARASHTRA – KONKAN REGION Appeal under Section 19(3) of RTI Act 2005. Appeal No.KR-1997/2008

- 50 - Shri Suresh Kumar Jain, D-63,Maker Kundan Garden, Juhu Road, Santacruz (W), Mumbai: 400 049. ….. Appellant.

V/s.

Public Information Officer, ….. Respondent Manager (Town Services), CIDCO Limited,. CIDCO Bhawan, C.B.D., Belapur, Navi Mumbai ; 400 614.

The Appellate Authority, General Manager (Administration), CIDCO Limited,. CIDCO Bhawan, C.B.D., Belapur, Navi Mumbai ; 400 614.

Facts : A copy of the above appeal is annexed.

Decision

Appellant is absent.. Public Information Officer Shri V.S. Marathe, Manager (Town Services), CIDCO Limited and First Appellate Authority Shri J. B. Khanvilkar, General Manager (Administration), CIDCO Limited are present. First Appellate Authority has given a decision on 25.10.2007 with which I am in general agreement. The Public Information Officer has thereafter supplied the information vide his letter dated 9.1.2009. There has been inordinate delay in implementing the decision of First Appellate Authority. The Public Information Officer should therefore show cause why penal action should not ensue.

(Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 21st April,2009.

BEFORE THE STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION MAHARASHTRA – KONKAN REGION Appeal under Section 19(3) of RTI Act 2005. Appeal No.KR-453/2009

Shri C.P. Singh, ….. Appellant. - 51 - 02, TPS VI, Santaacruz (W), Mumbai : 400 054. V/s. Public Information Officer (VV), C.I.D.C.O. Vasai, Ambika Commercial Complex, 2nd floor, Vasai (E), Dist: Thane : 401 210. ….. Respondent

The Appellate Authority, Additional Chief Planner ( VV/NT), CIDCO. Limited, CIDCO Bhavan, C.B.D., Belapur, Navi Mumbai : 400 614.

Facts: A copy of the above appeal is annexed.

×ÖÖÔµÖ

úÖëúÖ ³Ö¾ÖÖ, ( Ö¾ÖßÖ ãú´ÖÖ¸ü ) ²Öê»ÖÖ¯Öæ¸ü, Ö¾Öß ´ÖãÓ²Ö‡Ô : 400 614. ¸üÖ•µÖ ´ÖÖ×ÆüŸÖß †ÖµÖãŒŸÖ, ×¤üÖÖÓú : 22 ‹×¯ÖÏ»Ö, 2009. úÖëúÖ ÖÓ›ü¯Ößšü.

BEFORE THE STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION MAHARASHTRA – KONKAN REGION Appeal under Section 19(3) of RTI Act 2005. Appeal No.KR-414/2009 - 52 -

Shri Nazresh Maikal Mankar, ….. Appellant Near Pachubunder- Swadhaya Pariwar, Taluka Post : Vasai, Dist : Thane : 401 201.

V/s.

Public Information Officer, ….. Respondent Head Clerk, Vasai Machhimar Sarvodaya Sahakari Sanstha, Pachubunder, Taluka Post : Vasai, Dist : Thane : 401 201.

The Appellate Authority, Regional Dairy Development Officer, Thane Konkan Bhavan, 2nd floor, Navi Mumbai ; 400 614.

Facts: A copy of the above appeal is annexed.

Decision

Appellant is absent. Public Information Officer Shri Miltan Pedru Saudiya, Secretary, Vasai Machhimar Sarvodaya Sahakari Sanstha, Pachubunder is present.

First Appellate Authority has given a decision on 30-12-2008. Thereafter Public Information Officer has given inspection on 21.1.2009 where appellant remained present. Then on 22.1.2009 the Public Information Officer has called upon the appellant to deposit Rs. 500/- and take the information. But the appellant has not come forward. The appellant should approach the Public Information Officer during office hours and take the information if he so wishes.

(Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 22nd April, 2009.

BEFORE THE STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION MAHARASHTRA – KONKAN REGION Appeal under Section 19(3) of RTI Act 2005. Appeal No.KR-439/2009

Shri Mirza Jakir Gafoor Baig, ….. Appellant

- 53 - Amin Phalake Chawl, House No. 10/31, Bunder Road, Parasi Galli, Kalyan(W), Taluka : Kalyan, Dist : Thane.

V/s.

Public Information Officer, ….. Respondent Administrative Officer, Education Mandal, Bhiwandi-Nijampur City Municipal Corporation, Taluka ; Bhiwandi, Dist : Thane.

The Appellate Authority, Administrative Officer, Education Mandal, Bhiwandi-Nijampur City Municipal Corporation, Taluka ; Bhiwandi, Dist : Thane.

Facts: A copy of the above appeal is annexed.

×ÖÖÔµÖ

†×¯Ö»ÖÖ£Öá ˆ¯ÖÛÃ£ÖŸÖ. ¯ÖÏ£Ö´Ö †×¯Ö»ÖßµÖ †×¬ÖúÖ¸üß ÁÖß †Ö¸ü. ²Öß. £ÖÖê¸üÖŸÖ, ¯ÖÏ¿ÖÖÃÖúßµÖ †×¬ÖúÖ¸üß ×³Ö¾ÖÓ›üß ´ÖÆüÖÖÖ¸ü ¯ÖÖ×»ÖúÖ ŸÖÃÖê“Ö •ÖÖ ´ÖÖ×ÆüŸÖß †×¬ÖúÖ¸üß ÁÖß •Öê. ‹. ¿ÖêÖ, ¯ÖÏ¿ÖÖÃÖÖ †×¬ÖúÖ¸üß, ×³Ö¾ÖÓ›üß ´ÖÆüÖÖÖ¸ü ¯ÖÖ×»ÖúÖ ˆ¯ÖÛÃ£ÖŸÖ †ÖÆêüŸÖ. ÃÖÖÖê»Ö “Ö“ÖÖÔ —ÖÖ»Ößü. ¯ÖÏ£Ö´Ö †×¯Ö»ÖßµÖ †×¬ÖúÖ¸üß µÖÖÓÖß ×¤üÖÖÓú 21/2/2009 ¸üÖê•Öß ×¤ü»Öê»ÖÖ ×ÖÖÔµÖ µÖÖêµÖ †ÖÆêü. ¯Ö¸ÓüŸÖã ŸµÖÖ“Öß ¯ÖãÖÔ †Ó´Ö»Ö²Ö•ÖÖ¾ÖÖß —ÖÖ»Öê»Öß ÖÖÆüß. •ÖÖ ´ÖÖ×ÆüŸÖß †×¬ÖúÖ¸üß µÖÖÓÖß 7 ×¤ü¾ÖÃÖÓÖŸÖ ´ÖãªÖ Îú´ÖÖÓú 2, 3, 4 ¾Ö 5 ÃÖÓ²ÖÓ¬Öß ÃÖÓ¯ÖãÖÔ ´ÖÖ×ÆüŸÖß †×¯Ö»ÖúŸµÖÖÔÃÖ ªÖ¾Öß ¾Ö ŸµÖÖÖãÃÖÖ¸ü †Öã¯ÖÖ»ÖÖ †Æü¾ÖÖ»Ö †ÖµÖÖêÖÖÃÖ ÃÖÖ¤ü¸ü ú¸üÖ¾ÖÖ. †×¯Ö»Ö ÃÖÓ¯ÖãÂ™üÖŸÖ µÖêŸÖê.

BEFORE THE STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION MAHARASHTRA – KONKAN REGION Appeal under Section 19(3) of RTI Act 2005. Appeal No.KR-417/2009

- 54 - Shri Satish Birajdar, ….. Appellant Block No. 4/10, Elora Hsg. Society, Dindayal Road, Vishnu Nagar, Dombivali (W), Dist : Thane. 421 202.

V/s.

Public Information Officer, ….. Respondent Office of the Education Officer (Primary), Zilla Parishad, Thane, Dist. : Thane.

The Appellate Authority, Education Officer (Primary), Zilla Parishad, Thane, Dist. : Thane.

Facts: A copy of the above appeal is annexed.

×ÖÖÔµÖ

†×¯Ö»ÖÖ£Öá †Öã¯ÖÛÃ£ÖŸÖ. •ÖÖ ´ÖÖ×ÆüŸÖß †×¬ÖúÖ¸üß ÁÖß ‹Ö. ¾Æüß. ¯ÖÖ™üß»Ö, †×¬ÖÖú, ¯ÖÏÖ£Ö×´Öú, ×•Ö»ÆüÖ ¯Ö×¸üÂÖ¤ü, šüÖÖê ˆ¯ÖÛÃ£ÖŸÖ †ÖÆêüŸÖ. ¯ÖÏ£Ö´Ö †×¯Ö»ÖßµÖ †×¬ÖúÖ¸üß µÖÖÓÖß ×¤üÖÖÓú 28/2/2009 ¸üÖê•Öß ×ÖÖÔµÖ ×¤ü»Öê»ÖÖ †ÖÆêü ¾Ö ŸÖÖê µÖÖêµÖ ¾ÖÖ™üŸÖÖê. †×¯Ö»Ö ÃÖÓ¯ÖãÂ™üÖŸÖ µÖêŸÖê.

BEFORE THE STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION MAHARASHTRA – KONKAN REGION Appeal under Section 19(3) of RTI Act 2005. Appeal No.KR-443/2009

- 55 -

Shri Hasmukh Madhavji Thakkar, ….. Appellant 117, Bazarpeth, Bhiwandi, Taluka Bhiwandi, Dist : Thane.

V/s.

Public Information Officer, ….. Respondent Assistant Registrar, Co-operative Societies, Bhiwandi, Taluka : Bhiwandi, Dist : Thane.

The Appellate Authority, District Deputy Registrar, Co-operative Societies, Vardhavat Mansion, 1st floor, Shivaji Path, Thane (W), Dist : Thane.

Facts: A copy of the above appeal is annexed.

×ÖÖÔµÖ

†×¯Ö»ÖÖ£Öá ˆ¯ÖÛÃ£ÖŸÖ. ¯ÖÏ£Ö´Ö †×¯Ö»ÖßµÖ †×¬ÖúÖ¸üß µÖÖÓ“Öê ¯ÖÏ×ŸÖ×Ö¬Öß ÁÖß´ÖŸÖß ÃÖã.îú. “ÖÖê¯Ö›êüú¸ü, ÃÖÆüÖµµÖú ×Ö²ÖÓ¬Öú, ÃÖÆüúÖ¸üß ÃÖÓÃ£ÖÖ, šüÖÖê †Ö×Ö •ÖÖ ´ÖÖ×ÆüŸÖß †×¬ÖúÖ¸üß ÁÖß ‹ÃÖ. ²Öß. †Ó¬ÖÖ¸êü, ÃÖÆüÖµµÖú ×ÓÖ²ÖÓ¬Öú ÃÖÆüúÖ¸üß ÃÖÓÃ£ÖÖ, ×³Ö¾ÖÓ›üß ˆ¯ÖÛÃ£ÖŸÖ †ÖÆêüŸÖ. “Ö“ÖÖÔ —ÖÖ»Öß. ¯ÖÏ£Ö´Ö †×¯Ö»ÖßµÖ †×¬ÖúÖ¸üß µÖÖÓÖß ×¤üÖÖÓú 29/12/2008 ¸üÖê•Öß ×¤ü»Öê»ÖÖ ×ÖÖÔµÖ µÖÖêµÖ ¾ÖÖ™üŸÖÖê. ×Ö¾Ö›üÖãú ÃÖÓ²ÖÓ¬Öß“Öß ´ÖÖ×ÆüŸÖß ×ÃÖ»Ö ²ÖÓ¤ü —ÖÖ»Öê»Öß †ÖÆêü ŸÖß ˆ×“ÖŸÖ µÖÖµÖÖ»ÖµÖÖ“µÖÖ ×ÖÖÔµÖÖ ×¿Ö¾ÖÖµÖ ˆ‘Ö›æüÖ ¤êüÖê µÖÖêµÖ ÆüÖêÖÖ¸ü ÖÖÆüß. †×¯Ö»Ö ÃÖÓ¯ÖãÂ™üÖŸÖ µÖêŸÖê.

úÖëúÖ ³Ö¾ÖÖ, ( Ö¾ÖßÖ ãú´ÖÖ¸ü ) ²Öê»ÖÖ¯Öæ¸ü, Ö¾Öß ´ÖãÓ²Ö‡Ô : 400 614. ¸üÖ•µÖ ´ÖÖ×ÆüŸÖß †ÖµÖãŒŸÖ, ×¤üÖÖÓú : 22 ‹×¯ÖÏ»Ö, 2009. úÖëúÖ ÖÓ›ü¯Ößš

BEFORE THE STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION MAHARASHTRA – KONKAN REGION Appeal under Section 19(3) of RTI Act 2005. Appeal No.KR-454/2009

- 56 - Shri Rajaram R. Nikumbh, ….. Appellant Chandrika Palace, Plot No.224, Opp.Bagade Decorators Ulhasnagar-4. Dist-Thane. V/s. Public Information Officer, ….. Respondent Education Officer, Education Department, Kalyan-Dombivli Municipal Corporation, Kalyan, District-Thane.

The Appellate Authority, Adminisrative Officer, Education Department, Kalyan-Dombivli Municipal Corporation, Kalyan, District-Thane.

Facts: A copy of the above appeal is annexed.

Decision

Appellant is present. Public Information Officer Shri J.J. Tadvi, Edcuation Extension Officer, Kalyan-Dombivli Municipal Corporation and First Appellate Authority Shri G.V. Kulkarni, Administrative Officer, Kalyan-Dombivli Municipal Corporation are present.

First Appellate Authority has already given a decision on the applicant’s application with which I am in general agreement. The applicant’s main grievance is about the non payment of salary to about 119 Primary School teachers who did not get salary from1.1. 2004 to 18.4.2004. This matter pertains to internal administration of Municipal Corporation. The Commissoner, Kalyan-Dombivli Municipal Corporation should give a hearing to the appellant with a view to sort out this difficulty.

The appeal concludes.

(Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 22nd April, 2009. ¸üÖ•µÖ ´ÖÖ×ÆüŸÖß †ÖµÖÖêÖ, ´ÖÆüÖ¸üÖÂ™Òü, úÖëúÖ ÖÓ›ü¯Ößšü µÖÖÓ“Öê ÃÖ´ÖÖê¸ü ´ÖÖ×ÆüŸÖß“ÖÖ †×¬ÖúÖ¸ü †×¬Ö×ÖµÖ´Ö 2005 “Öê ú»Ö´Ö 19(3) †¾ÖµÖê Û¾¤üŸÖßµÖ †×¯Ö»Ö. †×¯Ö»Ö Îú´ÖÖÓú : êú†Ö¸ü-193 /2009 ÃÖÖî.ÃÖãÖ¤üÖ ´Ö¬ÖãÃÖã¤üÖ ÃÖÖ´ÖÓŸÖ, ´Öã.†ÖÖÓ¤ü¾ÆüÖôû, ¯ÖÖê.ãÓú³ÖÖ¸ü³ÖÖ™ü, ŸÖÖ.´ÖÖ»Ö¾ÖÖ, ×•Ö»ÆüÖ-ØÃÖ¬Öã¤ãüÖÔ. ... †×¯Ö»ÖúŸÖÖÔ - 57 - ×¾Ö¹ý¬¤ü •ÖÖ ´ÖÖ×ÆüŸÖß †×¬ÖúÖ¸üß, úÖ †×¬ÖúÖ¸üß, ÖÏÖ´Ö ×¾ÖúÖÃÖ ¾Ö •Ö»ÖÃÖÓ¬ÖÖ¸üÖ ×¾Ö³ÖÖÖ, ´ÖÓ¡ÖÖ»ÖµÖ, ´ÖãÓ²Ö‡Ô- 400 032. ... ÃÖÖ´ÖÖê¾ÖÖ»Öê

¯ÖÏ£Ö´Ö †×¯Ö»ÖßµÖ ¯ÖÏÖ×¬ÖúÖ¸üß, ˆ¯Ö ÃÖ×“Ö¾Ö, ÖÏÖ´Ö ×¾ÖúÖÃÖ ¾Ö •Ö»ÖÃÖÓ¬ÖÖ¸üÖ ×¾Ö³ÖÖÖ, ´ÖÓ¡ÖÖ»ÖµÖ, ´ÖãÓ²Ö‡Ô- 400 032. †ÓŸÖ×¸ü´Ö †Ö¤êü¿Ö ¯ÖÏ£Ö´Ö †×¯Ö×»ÖµÖ †×¬ÖúÖ¸üß µÖÖÓÓÖß µÖÖ ¯ÖÏú¸üÖÖŸÖ ×ÖÖÔµÖ ×¤ü»µÖÖ“Öê ×¤üÃÖæÖ µÖêŸÖê. ŸÖ£ÖÖ×¯Ö, ÃÖ¤ü¸ü ×ÖÖÔµÖÖÖê †×¯Ö»ÖúŸµÖÖÔ“Öê ÃÖ´ÖÖ¬ÖÖÖ —ÖÖ»Öê ÖÃÖ»µÖÖ´Öãôêû ŸµÖÖÓÖß ú»Ö´Ö 19 (3) †¾ÖµÖê Û¾¤üŸÖßµÖ †×¯Ö»Ö ¤üÖÖ»Ö êú»Öê †ÖÆêü (¯ÖÏŸÖ ÃÖÖê²ÖŸÖ ÃÖÓ»ÖÖ). †×¯Ö»ÖúŸÖÖÔ µÖÖÓÖß ¾ÖÃŸÖãÛÃ£ÖŸÖß¤ü¿ÖÔú ´ÖÖ×ÆüŸÖß“Öß ´ÖÖÖÖß êú»Öê»Öß †ÖÆêü. ´Ö»ÖÖ †ÃÖê ¾ÖÖ™üŸÖê úß, ¯ÖÏ£Ö´Ö †×¯Ö»ÖßµÖ †×¬ÖúÖ¸üß µÖÖÓÖß †×¯Ö»ÖúŸÖÖÔ µÖÖÓ“Öê¿Öß ¯ÖãÆüÖ ‹ú¤üÖ “Ö“ÖÖÔ/×¾Ö“ÖÖ¸ü ×¾Ö×Ö´ÖµÖ ú¹ýÖ •ÖÖÃŸÖßŸÖ •ÖÖÃŸÖ ´ÖÖ×ÆüŸÖß ¤êüµÖÖÃÖÓ¤ü³ÖÖÔŸÖ ¯ÖÏµÖŸÖ êú»µÖÖÃÖ ¾Ö ŸµÖÖ´Öãôêû †×¯Ö»ÖúŸµÖÖÔ“Öê ÃÖ´ÖÖ¬ÖÖÖ —ÖÖ»Öê ŸÖ¸ü †ÖµÖÖêÖÖú›êü µÖêµÖÖú¸üßŸÖÖÓ ÃÖ¾ÖÔ ¯ÖÖúÖ¸üÖÓ“ÖÖ ¾Öêôû, ¯ÖÏ¾ÖÖÃÖ Ö“ÖÔ ¾Ö ŸµÖÖ´Öãôêû ŸµÖÖÓÖÖ ÆüÖêÖÖ¸üß ŸÖÃÖ¤üß ™üÖôûŸÖÖ µÖêŸÖß»Ö. µÖÖÃŸÖ¾Ö, ´Öß Æêü †×¯Ö»Ö ¯ÖÏ£Ö´Ö †×¯Ö»ÖßµÖ ¯ÖÏÖ×¬ÖúÖ¸üß µÖÖÓ“Öêú›êü ¯ÖãÖÔ¯ÖÏê×ÂÖŸÖ ( ×¸ü´ÖÖÓ›ü) ú¸üßŸÖ †ÖÆêü. ŸµÖÖÓÖß †×¯Ö»ÖúŸÖÖÔ µÖÖÓÖÖ ¯ÖãÆüÖ ÃÖãÖÖ¾ÖÖß“Öß ‹ú ÃÖÓ¬Öß ¤êü‰úÖ †×¯Ö»ÖúŸÖÖÔ µÖÖÖßÓ ˆ¯ÖÛÃ£ÖŸÖ êú»Öê»µÖÖ ´ÖãªÖÓ“ÖÖ ×¾Ö“ÖÖ¸ü ú¸üµÖÖÓŸÖ µÖÖ¾ÖÖ ¾Ö ¿ÖŒµÖŸÖÖê ¯Ö×¸ü¯ÖãÖÔ ´ÖÖ×ÆüŸÖß ¤êüµÖÖ“µÖÖ¥üÂ™üßÖê úÖµÖÔ¾ÖÖÆüß ú¸üÖ¾Öß ¾Ö •Ö¸ü ´ÖÖÖÖß êú»Öê»Öß ´ÖÖ×ÆüŸÖß ‹úÖ ¯ÖêÖÖ †×¬Öú •ÖÖ ´ÖÖ×ÆüŸÖß †×¬ÖúÖ-µÖÖÓ¿Öß ÃÖÓ²ÖÓ×¬ÖŸÖ †ÃÖê»Ö ŸÖ¸ü ŸµÖÖ ÃÖ¾ÖÖÕÖÖ ÃÖãÖÖ¾ÖÖßÃÖ ²ÖÖê»Ö¾ÖÖ¾Öê †Ö×Ö ŸµÖÖÖÓŸÖ¸ü µÖÖ ¯ÖÏú¸üÖß ÃÖ´ÖµÖÖµÖßú †Ö¤êü¿Ö ¯ÖÖ×¸üŸÖ ú¸üÖ¾ÖêŸÖ, •ÖêÖê ú¹ýÖ †×¯Ö»ÖúŸÖÖÔ µÖÖÓ“Öê ÃÖ´ÖÖ¬ÖÖÖ ÆüÖê‡Ô»Ö. ¯ÖÏ£Ö´Ö †×¯Ö»ÖßµÖ ¯ÖÏÖ×¬ÖúÖ¸üß µÖÖÓÖß µÖÖ ÃÖÓ¤ü³ÖÖÔŸÖ µÖÖ¯Öã¾Öá †Ö¤êü¿Ö ×ÖÖÔ×´ÖŸÖ êú»Öê †ÃÖ»Öê ŸÖ¸üß ˆ¯Ö¸üÖêŒŸÖ ¯ÖÏ´ÖÖÖê úÖµÖÔ¾ÖÖÆüß ú¹ýÖ Ö¾µÖÖÖê †Ö¤êü¿Ö ¯ÖÖ¸üßŸÖ ú¸üÖ¾ÖêŸÖ, ´ÆüÖ•Öê ŸµÖÖÓ“ÖÖ µÖÖ¯Öã¾Öá“ÖÖ ×ÖÖÔµÖ †Ö¯ÖÖê†Ö¯Ö ÃÖã¬ÖÖ¸üßŸÖ ÆüÖê‡Ô»Ö. ˆ¯Ö¸üÖêŒŸÖ ¯ÖÏ´ÖÖÖê êú»Öê»µÖÖ úÖµÖÔ¾ÖÖÆüß“ÖÖ úÖµÖÔ¯ÖæŸÖá †Æü¾ÖÖ»Ö 45 ×¤ü¾ÖÃÖÖÓŸÖ ¯ÖÏ£Ö´Ö †×¯Ö»ÖßµÖ ¯ÖÏÖ×¬ÖúÖ¸üß µÖÖÓÖß †ÖµÖÖêÖÖÃÖ ÃÖÖ¤ü¸ü ú¸üÖ¾ÖÖ. ŸÖ£ÖÖ×¯Ö, •Ö¸ü ¯ÖÏ£Ö´Ö †×¯Ö»ÖßµÖ †×¬ÖúÖ¸üß µÖÖÓ“Öß †¿Öß šüÖ´Ö ¬ÖÖ¸üÖÖ †ÃÖê»Ö úß, Û¾¤üŸÖßµÖ ÃÖãÖÖ¾ÖÖß ¤êü‰úÖ úÖÓÆüß ÃÖÖ¬µÖ ÆüÖêÖÖ¸ü ÖÖÆüß. ŸÖ¸ü ŸµÖÖÓÖß •ÖÖê›ü»Öê»µÖÖ †×¯Ö»Ö †•ÖÖÔŸÖ ˆ¯ÖÛÃ£ÖŸÖ êú»Öê»µÖÖ ´ÖãªÖÓ¾Ö¸ü ´Öã§êü×ÖÆüÖµÖ ÃÖ×¾ÖÃŸÖ¸ü †×³Ö¯ÖÏÖµÖ 15 ×¤ü¾ÖÃÖÖÓŸÖ †ÖµÖÖêÖÖÃÖ ÃÖÖ¤ü¸ü ú¸üÖ¾ÖÖ. ÃÖÆüß/- úÖëúÖ ³Ö¾ÖÖ, ( Ö¾ÖßÖ ãú´ÖÖ¸ü ) ²Öê»ÖÖ¯Öæ¸ü,Ö¾Öß ´ÖãÓ²Ö‡Ô : 400 614. ¸üÖ•µÖ ´ÖÖ×ÆüŸÖß †ÖµÖãŒŸÖ, ×¤üÖÖÓú : 3 ±êú²ÖÎã¾ÖÖ¸üß,2009. úÖêúÖ ÖÓ›ü¯Ößšü ×ÖÖÔµÖ

†×¯Ö»ÖÖ£Öá †Öã¯ÖÛÃ£ÖŸÖ. ¯ÖÏ£Ö´Ö †×¯Ö»ÖßµÖ †×¬ÖúÖ¸üß ÁÖß ¯ÖÏúÖ¿Ö ×Æü»Öìêú¸ü, ˆ¯Ö ÃÖ×“Ö¾Ö ŸÖÃÖê“Ö •ÖÖ ´ÖÖ×ÆüŸÖß †×¬ÖúÖ¸üß ÁÖß ¸üÖ•Öë¦ü ¾ÖÖ‘Ö, úÖ †×¬ÖúÖ¸üß, ÖÏÖ´Ö ×¾ÖúÖÃÖ ¾Ö •Ö»Ö ÃÖÓ¬ÖÖ¸üÖ ×¾Ö³ÖÖÖ ˆ¯ÖÛÃ£ÖŸÖ †ÖÆêüŸÖ. ¯ÖÏ£Ö´Ö †×¯Ö»ÖßµÖ †×¬ÖúÖ¸üß µÖÖÓÖß ×¤üÖÖÓú 19/11/2008 ¸üÖê•Öß ×ÖÖÔµÖ ×¤ü»Öê»ÖÖ †ÖÆêü ¾Ö ŸÖÖê µÖÖêµÖ ¾ÖÖ™üŸÖÖê. †×¯Ö»Ö ÃÖÓ¯ÖãÂ™üÖŸÖ µÖêŸÖê.

BEFORE THE STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION MAHARASHTRA – KONKAN REGION Appeal under Section 19(3) of RTI Act 2005. Appeal No.KR-436/2009

Shri C.P. Singh, ….. Appellant. - 58 - 02, TPS VI, Santaacruz (W), Mumbai : 400 054.

V/s.

Public Information Officer (VV), C.I.D.C.O. Vasai, Ambika Commercial Complex, 2nd floor, Vasai (E), Dist: Thane : 401 210. ….. Respondent

The Appellate Authority, Additional Chief Planner ( VV/NT), CIDCO. Limited, CIDCO Bhavan, C.B.D., Belapur, Navi Mumbai : 400 614.

Facts: A copy of the above appeal is annexed.

×ÖÖÔµÖ

†×¯Ö»ÖÖ£Öá ˆ¯ÖÛÃ£ÖŸÖ. ¯ÖÏ£Ö´Ö †×¯Ö»ÖßµÖ †×¬ÖúÖ¸üß ÁÖß ×ú¸üÖ †Ó. Ø¿Ö¤êü, †×ŸÖ×¸üŒŸÖ ´ÖãµÖ ×ÖµÖÖê•ÖÖúÖ¸ü, ×ÃÖ›üúÖê ´ÖµÖÖÔ×¤üŸÖ ˆ¯ÖÛÃ£ÖŸÖ †ÖÆêüŸÖ. ÃÖÖÖê»Ö “Ö“ÖÖÔ —ÖÖ»Öê»Öß †ÖÆêü. µÖÖ †×¯Ö»ÖÖŸÖ ¯ÖÏ£Ö´Ö †×¯Ö»ÖßµÖ †×¬ÖúÖ¸üß µÖÖÓÖß ×ÖÖÔµÖ ×¤ü»ÖÖ †ÖÆêü. ×ÖÖÔµÖ µÖÖêµÖ †ÖÆêü. ¯ÖÏ£Ö´Ö †×¯Ö»ÖßµÖ ¯ÖÏÖ×¬ÖúÖ¸üß µÖÖÓÖß ŸµÖÖÓ“µÖÖ †Ö¤êü¿ÖÖ“µÖÖ ¿Öê¾Ö™ü“µÖÖ ¯Ö×¸ü“”êû¤üÖŸÖ ˆ»»Öê×Ö»Öê»Öê ×¤üÖÖÓú 9/8/2007 “µÖÖ †Ö¤êü¿ÖÖ“Öß ¯ÖÏŸÖ †×¯Ö»ÖúŸµÖÖÔÃÖ ´ÖÖê±úŸÖ ¯ÖãÆüÖ ˆ¯Ö»Ö²¬Ö ú¹ýÖ ªÖ¾Öß. †×¯Ö»Ö ÃÖÓ¯ÖãÂ™üÖŸÖ µÖêŸÖê.

BEFORE THE STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION MAHARASHTRA – KONKAN REGION Appeal under Section 19(3) of RTI Act 2005. Appeal No.KR-438/2009

Shri C.P. Singh, ….. Appellant. - 59 - 02, TPS VI, Santaacruz (W), Mumbai : 400 054.

V/s.

Public Information Officer (VV), C.I.D.C.O. Vasai, Ambika Commercial Complex, 2nd floor, Vasai (E), Dist: Thane : 401 210. ….. Respondent

The Appellate Authority, Additional Chief Planner ( VV/NT), CIDCO. Limited, CIDCO Bhavan, C.B.D., Belapur, Navi Mumbai : 400 614.

Facts: A copy of the above appeal is annexed.

×ÖÖÔµÖ

BEFORE THE STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION MAHARASHTRA – KONKAN REGION Appeal under Section 19(3) of RTI Act 2005. Appeal No.KR-399/2009

Shri Vasant Vithoba Sarphare, ….. Appellant - 60 - At & Post : Vatul, Taluka : Rajapur, District : Ratnagiri : 415 643.

V/s.

Public Information Officer, ….. Respondent Gram Sevak, Vatul, Gram Panchayat, Vatul, Taluka : Rajapur, Dist : Ratnagiri.

The Appellate Authority, Extension Officer, ( Gram Panchayat), Panchayat Samiti, Rajapur, Taluka ; Rajapur, Dist : Ratnagiri.

Facts: A copy of the above appeal is annexed.

×ÖÖÔµÖ

†×¯Ö»ÖÖ£Öá ˆ¯ÖÛÃ£ÖŸÖ. ¯ÖÏ£Ö´Ö †×¯Ö»ÖßµÖ †×¬ÖúÖ¸üß ÁÖß ¯Öß. ²Öß. ²ÖÖ´ÖÖê, ×¾ÖÃŸÖÖ¸ü †×¬ÖúÖ¸üß (ÖÏÖ´Ö ¯ÖÓ“ÖÖµÖŸÖ), ¯ÖÓ“ÖÖµÖŸÖ ÃÖ×´ÖŸÖß, ¸üÖ•ÖÖ¯Öæ¸ü ŸÖÃÖê“Ö •ÖÖ ´ÖÖ×ÆüŸÖß †×¬ÖúÖ¸üß ÁÖß †×Ö»Ö ¾ÖÖ. ×¯Öšü»Öêú¸ü, ÖÏÖ´Ö ÃÖê¾Öú, ÖÏÖ´Ö ¯ÖÓ“ÖÖµÖŸÖ ¾ÖÖ™æüôû, ŸÖÖ»ÖãúÖ ¸üÖ•ÖÖ¯Öæ¸ü ˆ¯ÖÛÃ£ÖŸÖ †ÖÆêüŸÖ. ÃÖÖÖê»Ö “Ö“ÖÖÔ —ÖÖ»Ößü. ¯ÖÏ£Ö´Ö †×¯Ö»ÖßµÖ †×¬ÖúÖ¸üß µÖÖÓÖß ×¤üÖÖÓú 5/1/2009 ¸üÖê•Öß ×ÖÖÔµÖ ×¤»Öêü»ÖÖ †ÖÆêü ŸÖÖê µÖÖêµÖ ¾ÖÖ™üŸÖÖêü. †×¯Ö»Ö ÃÖÓ¯ÖãÂ™üÖŸÖ µÖêŸÖê.

BEFORE THE STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION MAHARASHTRA – KONKAN REGION Appeal under Section 19(3) of RTI Act 2005. Appeal No. KR-14/2008

- 61 - Shri Vasant Nau Mhatre,,, ….. Appellant At : Ranjnoli, Post : Dandekarwadi,, Taluka : Bhiwandi, Dist : Thane. V/s Public Information Officer, ….. Respondent Superintending Engineer, Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Co. Ltd., Tejswini, Bhiwandi. Dist : Thane.

The Appellate Authority, Superintending Engineer, Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Co. Ltd., Tejswini, Bhiwandi. Dist : Thane.

Facts: The appellant by an application dated 22/4/2006 asked for information regarding installation of LT line of village Ranjnoli. Interim Decision The appeal application has been perused. The papers attached do not show that this matter has been examined and considered at the level of the First Appellate Authority. I remand this appeal to the First Appellate Authority for giving a hearing to the appellant and for giving a reasoned decision with a view to facilitate flow of maximum information to the appellant. A compliance report should be submitted, within 45 days by the First Appellant Authority, to me. The Public Information Officer should bring this decision to the notice of his First Appellate Authority to avoid delay and penal action. Sd/-- (Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:-17th June, 2008. Decision

Appellant is absent. Public Information Officer Shri S. Anand, Executive Engineer, Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Ltd., Nodal office Bhiwandi is present. Appellant has communicate that he is satisfied with the information received by him ( vide letter dated 22.4.2009 ). The appeal concludes.

(Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 22nd April,2009.

BEFORE THE STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION MAHARASHTRA – KONKAN REGION Appeal under Section 19(3) of RTI Act 2005. Appeal No.KR-440/2009

- 62 -

Shri Shivanand R. Ankolekar ….. Appellant Flatted Factory, L.B.S. Marg, Wagle Estate,Thane (W) : 400 604.

V/s.

Public Information Officer, ….. Respondent Area Manager-III, M.I.D.C., Thane Region, Thane :400 604.

The Appellate Authority, Regional Officer, M.I.D.C., Thane Region, Thane :400 604.

Facts: A copy of the above appeal is annexed.

Decision

Appellant is absent. Public Information Officer Shri R.G. Pandav, Area Manager, M.I.D.C. is present.

Case taken up on merits. First Appellate Authority has given a decision on 9.2.2009 with which I am in general agreement.

The appeal concludes.

(Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 22nd April, 2009.

- 63 -