DOCSLIB.ORG

Votes and Proceedings

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Votes and Proceedings No. 151 Tuesday 12 June 2018 Votes and Proceedings Corrected 31 July 2018 The House met at 11.30 am. Prayers 1 Questions to the Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy 2 Alcohol (Minimum Pricing) (England): Motion for leave to bring in a Bill (Standing Order No. 23) Ordered, That leave be given to bring in a Bill to make provision about the minimum price at which alcohol may be sold from licensed premises in England; and for connected purposes; That Fiona Bruce, Sir David Amess, Jack Brereton, Dr Lisa Cameron, Alex Cunningham, Sir Jeffrey M. Donaldson, Frank Field, Norman Lamb, Sir Edward Leigh, Jeremy Lefroy, Dr Philippa Whitford and Dr Sarah Wollaston present the Bill. Fiona Bruce accordingly presented the Bill. Bill read the first time; to be read a second time on Friday 26 October, and to be printed (Bill 223). 3 European Union (Withdrawal) Bill: Programme (No. 3) Motion made and Question put forthwith (Standing Order No. 83A(7)), That the following provisions shall apply to the European Union (Withdrawal) Bill for the purpose of supplementing the Orders of 11 September 2017 (European Union (Withdrawal) Bill (Programme)) and 16 January 2018 (European Union (Withdrawal) Bill (Programme) (No. 2)): Consideration of Lords Amendments (1) Proceedings on consideration of Lords Amendments shall be completed in two days. 2 Votes and Proceedings: 12 June 2018 No. 151 (2) The proceedings shall be taken in the order shown in the first column of the following Table. (3) The proceedings shall (so far as not previously concluded) be brought to a conclusion at the times specified in the second column of the Table. Table Lords Amendments Time for conclusion of proceedings Nos. 110, 128, 37, 39, 125, 19, 52, 10, 43, Three hours after the commencement of 45, 20, 11 to 14, 18, 21 to 23, 44, 47, 102 proceedings on consideration of Lords to 107, 112, 113, 115 to 119, 121 to 124, Amendments on the first day 126, 127, 130 to 134, 136 to 140, 142 to 148, 150, 152, 154, 156 to 158, 171, and 172. Nos. 25, 15 to 17, 26 to 31, 46, 48 to 50, Six hours after the commencement of 54 to 101, 108, 109, 111, 114, 120, 129, proceedings on consideration of Lords 135, 141, 149, 151, 153, 155, 162, 165, Amendments on the first day 169, and 173 to 196. Nos. 51, 1, 2, 5, 53, 4, 3, 24, 32, 6 to 9, 33 Six hours after the commencement of to 36, 38, 40 to 42, 159 to 161, 163, 164, proceedings on consideration of Lords 166 to 168, and 170. Amendments on the second day Subsequent stages (4) Any further Message from the Lords may be programmed.—(Secretary David Davis.) The House divided. Division No. 165. Ayes: 321 (Tellers: Paul Maynard, Stuart Andrew). Noes: 304 (Tellers: Thangam Debbonaire, Jeff Smith). Question accordingly agreed to. 4 European Union (Withdrawal) Bill: Consideration of Lords Amendments (first day) The Speaker announced that Lords Amendments 3, 13, 18, 22, 72, 103 and 121 to 124 engaged Commons financial privilege. Lords Amendment 110 Motion made and Question proposed, That this House disagrees with the Lords in their Amendment 110.—(Secretary David Davis.) The Speaker announced a time limit on backbench speeches (Standing Order No. 47(1)). At 4.15 pm, the debate was interrupted (Programme Order, today). It being three hours after the commencement of proceedings on consideration of Lords Amendments on the first day, the Chair put the Questions necessary to bring proceedings on Lords Amendments 110, 128, 37, 39, 125, 19, 52, 10, 43, 45, 20, 11 to 14, 18, 21 to 23, 44, 47, 102 to 107, 112, 113, 115 to 119, 121 to 124, 126, 127, 130 to 134, 136 to 140, 142 to 148, 150, 152, 154, 156 to 158, 171 and 172 to a conclusion (Programme Order, today). The following Questions were put forthwith (Standing Order No. 83F). (1) That this House disagrees with the Lords in their Amendment 110 (Question already proposed from the Chair). The House divided. No. 151 Votes and Proceedings: 12 June 2018 3 Division No. 166. Ayes: 324 (Tellers: Paul Maynard, Stuart Andrew). Noes: 302 (Tellers: Thangam Debbonaire, Jeff Smith). Question agreed to. Lords Amendment 110 accordingly disagreed to. (2) That this House disagrees with the Lords in their Amendment 128 (Question on any Motion moved by a Minister of the Crown to disagree with a Lords amendment).— (Secretary David Davis.) The House divided. Division No. 167. Ayes: 325 (Tellers: Paul Maynard, Stuart Andrew). Noes: 304 (Tellers: Thangam Debbonaire, Jeff Smith). Question agreed to. Lords Amendment 128 accordingly disagreed to. (3) That this House disagrees with the Lords in their Amendment 37 (Question on any Motion moved by a Minister of the Crown to disagree with a Lords amendment).— (Secretary David Davis.) The House divided. Division No. 168. Ayes: 326 (Tellers: Paul Maynard, Stuart Andrew). Noes: 301 (Tellers: Thangam Debbonaire, Jeff Smith). Question agreed to. Lords Amendment 37 accordingly disagreed to. (4) That this House disagrees with the Lords in their Amendment 39 (Question on any Motion moved by a Minister of the Crown to disagree with a Lords amendment).— (Secretary David Davis.) The House divided. Division No. 169. Ayes: 324 (Tellers: Jo Churchill, Nigel Adams). Noes: 302 (Tellers: Thangam Debbonaire, Jeff Smith). Question agreed to. Lords Amendment 39 accordingly disagreed to. (5) That this House disagrees with the Lords in their Amendment 125 (Question on any Motion moved by a Minister of the Crown to disagree with a Lords amendment).— (Secretary David Davis.) The House divided. Division No. 170. Ayes: 328 (Tellers: Jo Churchill, Nigel Adams). Noes: 297 (Tellers: Thangam Debbonaire, Jeff Smith). Question agreed to. 4 Votes and Proceedings: 12 June 2018 No. 151 Lords Amendment 125 accordingly disagreed to. (6) That this House disagrees with the Lords in their Amendment 19 (Question on any Motion moved by a Minister of the Crown to disagree with a Lords amendment).— (Secretary David Davis.) The House divided. Division No. 171. Ayes: 324 (Tellers: Jo Churchill, Nigel Adams). Noes: 298 (Tellers: Thangam Debbonaire, Jeff Smith). Question agreed to. Lords Amendment 19 accordingly disagreed to. (7) That Amendments (a) and (b) be made to the Bill in lieu of Lords Amendment 19 disagreed to (Single Question on any amendments moved by a Minister of the Crown relevant to the Lords Amendment).—(Secretary David Davis.) Question agreed to. (8) That this House disagrees with the Lords in their Amendment 52 (Question on any Motion moved by a Minister of the Crown to disagree with a Lords amendment).— (Secretary David Davis.) The House divided. Division No. 172. Ayes: 326 (Tellers: Craig Whittaker, Andrew Stephenson). Noes: 301 (Tellers: Thangam Debbonaire, Jeff Smith). Question agreed to. Lords Amendment 52 accordingly disagreed to. (9) That this House disagrees with the Lords in their Amendment 10 (Question on any Motion moved by a Minister of the Crown to disagree with a Lords amendment).— (Secretary David Davis.) The House divided. Division No. 173. Ayes: 320 (Tellers: Craig Whittaker, Andrew Stephenson). Noes: 305 (Tellers: Thangam Debbonaire, Jeff Smith). Question agreed to. Lords Amendment 10 accordingly disagreed to. (10) That this House disagrees with the Lords in their Amendment 43 (Question on any Motion moved by a Minister of the Crown to disagree with a Lords amendment).— (Secretary David Davis.) The House divided. Division No. 174. Ayes: 322 (Tellers: Craig Whittaker, Andrew Stephenson). Noes: 306 (Tellers: Thangam Debbonaire, Jeff Smith). Question agreed to. Lords Amendment 43 accordingly disagreed to. No. 151 Votes and Proceedings: 12 June 2018 5 (11) That this House disagrees with the Lords in their Amendment 45 (Question on any Motion moved by a Minister of the Crown to disagree with a Lords amendment).— (Secretary David Davis.) The House divided. Division No. 175. Ayes: 317 (Tellers: Paul Maynard, Andrew Stephenson). Noes: 306 (Tellers: Thangam Debbonaire, Jeff Smith). Question agreed to. Lords Amendment 45 accordingly disagreed to. (12) That this House disagrees with the Lords in their Amendment 20 (Question on any Motion moved by a Minister of the Crown to disagree with a Lords amendment).— (Secretary David Davis.) The House divided. Division No. 176. Ayes: 321 (Tellers: Paul Maynard, Stuart Andrew). Noes: 305 (Tellers: Thangam Debbonaire, Jeff Smith). Question agreed to. Lords Amendment 20 accordingly disagreed to. (13) That this House agrees with the Lords in their Amendments 11 to 14, 18, 21 to 23, 44, 47, 102 to 107, 112, 113, 115 to 119, 121 to 124, 126, 127, 130 to 134, 136 to 140, 142 to 148, 150, 152, 154, 156 to 158, 171 and 172 (Question put forthwith by the Speaker that this House agrees with the Lords in all the remaining Lords amendments). Question agreed to. Lords Amendments 11 to 14, 18, 21 to 23, 44, 47, 102 to 107, 112, 113, 115 to 119, 121 to 124, 126, 127, 130 to 134, 136 to 140, 142 to 148, 150, 152, 154, 156 to 158, 171 and 172 accordingly agreed to, with Commons financial privilege waived in respect of Lords Amendments 13, 18, 22, 103 and 121 to 124. Lords Amendment 25 At 7.15 pm, proceedings were interrupted (Programme Order, today). It being six hours after the commencement of proceedings on consideration of Lords Amendments on the first day, the Chair put the Questions necessary to bring proceedings on Lords Amendments 25, 15 to 17, 26 to 31, 46, 48 to 50, 54 to 101, 108, 109, 111, 114, 120, 129, 135, 141, 149, 151, 153, 155, 162, 165, 169 and 173 to 196 to a conclusion (Programme Order, today).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • View Questions Tabled on PDF File 0.16 MB
    Published: Tuesday 17 November 2020 Questions tabled on Monday 16 November 2020 Includes questions tabled on earlier days which have been transferred. T Indicates a topical oral question. Members are selected by ballot to ask a Topical Question. † Indicates a Question not included in the random selection process but accepted because the quota for that day had not been filled. N Indicates a question for written answer on a named day under S.O. No. 22(4). [R] Indicates that a relevant interest has been declared. Questions for Answer on Tuesday 17 November Questions for Written Answer 1 N Tim Loughton (East Worthing and Shoreham): To ask the Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster and Minister for the Cabinet Office, how many deaths there were from seasonal flu in each month of the last three years. [Transferred] (114757) 2 Preet Kaur Gill (Birmingham, Edgbaston): To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, what his policy is on ending public financing of fossil fuels overseas; and if he will make a statement. [Transferred] (91999) 3 N Hilary Benn (Leeds Central): To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, whether public (a) demonstrations, (b) marches and (c) picketing are permitted under The Health Protection (Coronavirus, Restrictions) (England) (No. 4) Regulations 2020. [Transferred] (114777) 4 Jon Trickett (Hemsworth): To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, whether local councils have the jurisdiction to issue self-isolation payments to people who have been instructed to self-isolate but do not possess a reference number from NHS Test and Trace.
    [Show full text]
  • THE 422 Mps WHO BACKED the MOTION Conservative 1. Bim
    THE 422 MPs WHO BACKED THE MOTION Conservative 1. Bim Afolami 2. Peter Aldous 3. Edward Argar 4. Victoria Atkins 5. Harriett Baldwin 6. Steve Barclay 7. Henry Bellingham 8. Guto Bebb 9. Richard Benyon 10. Paul Beresford 11. Peter Bottomley 12. Andrew Bowie 13. Karen Bradley 14. Steve Brine 15. James Brokenshire 16. Robert Buckland 17. Alex Burghart 18. Alistair Burt 19. Alun Cairns 20. James Cartlidge 21. Alex Chalk 22. Jo Churchill 23. Greg Clark 24. Colin Clark 25. Ken Clarke 26. James Cleverly 27. Thérèse Coffey 28. Alberto Costa 29. Glyn Davies 30. Jonathan Djanogly 31. Leo Docherty 32. Oliver Dowden 33. David Duguid 34. Alan Duncan 35. Philip Dunne 36. Michael Ellis 37. Tobias Ellwood 38. Mark Field 39. Vicky Ford 40. Kevin Foster 41. Lucy Frazer 42. George Freeman 43. Mike Freer 44. Mark Garnier 45. David Gauke 46. Nick Gibb 47. John Glen 48. Robert Goodwill 49. Michael Gove 50. Luke Graham 51. Richard Graham 52. Bill Grant 53. Helen Grant 54. Damian Green 55. Justine Greening 56. Dominic Grieve 57. Sam Gyimah 58. Kirstene Hair 59. Luke Hall 60. Philip Hammond 61. Stephen Hammond 62. Matt Hancock 63. Richard Harrington 64. Simon Hart 65. Oliver Heald 66. Peter Heaton-Jones 67. Damian Hinds 68. Simon Hoare 69. George Hollingbery 70. Kevin Hollinrake 71. Nigel Huddleston 72. Jeremy Hunt 73. Nick Hurd 74. Alister Jack (Teller) 75. Margot James 76. Sajid Javid 77. Robert Jenrick 78. Jo Johnson 79. Andrew Jones 80. Gillian Keegan 81. Seema Kennedy 82. Stephen Kerr 83. Mark Lancaster 84.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Archived BBC Public Responses to Complaints
    Archived BBC public responses to complaints 2019 This Week, BBC One, 10 January 2019 Summary of complaint We received complaints from people who felt Owen Jones was treated in a disrespectful manner while appearing as a guest on the programme. Our response Following the verbal abuse which he and others had sustained from protesters outside Parliament, Owen Jones, journalist, left wing commentator and activist, used his “Take of the Week” section to give his personal take on the current state of political discourse, the rise of the far right and, as he deemed, the reasons for this. This is a prominent section of the programme in which the author gives their views unchallenged. During his video and the studio discussion which followed, Mr Jones made allegations about the Conservative Party and right wing media which some would consider contentious. As our audience would expect, Andrew scrutinised what Mr Jones said. Michael Portillo, who disagreed with Mr Jones, also gave his opinion. Mr Jones was given ample time to express his views and respond to points made to him. When Mr Jones made allegations about The Spectator magazine and Andrew’s role with the publication. Andrew legitimately pointed out that this was nothing to do with the BBC and it wasn’t right for Mr Jones to use the programme to make personal accusations against him. Today, BBC Radio 4, 26 January 2019 Summary of complaint We received a range of complaints following the interview of Helen McEntee. Some listeners felt the tone and content were not appropriate, suggesting a personal bias from the interviewer.
    [Show full text]
  • Political Affairs Digest a Daily Summary of Political Events Affecting the Jewish Community Scottish Council of Jewish Communities
    4 July 2018 Issue 1,660 Political Affairs Digest A daily summary of political events affecting the Jewish Community Scottish Council of Jewish Communities SCoJeC Contents Home Affairs Foreign Affairs Israel Relevant Legislation Consultations Home Affairs House of Lords Written Answers Terrorism Baroness Uddin (Non-affiliated) [HL8797] To ask Her Majesty's Government how many (1) Muslim, and (2) non-Muslim women have been remanded or convicted under any terrorism legislation since 2010. Lord Keen of Elie: 28 women have been remanded or convicted under terrorism legislation since 2010. Of these, 27 were Muslim and 1 was non-Muslim. https://www.parliament.uk/business/publications/written-questions-answers- statements/written-question/Lords/2018-06-19/HL8797/ Terrorism Baroness Uddin (Non-affiliated) [HL8798] To ask Her Majesty's Government what is the average length of sentence for (1) Muslim, and (2) non-Muslim women convicted under any terrorism legislation since 2010. Lord Keen of Elie: It is not possible to determine the average sentence length of a cohort that includes indeterminate sentences. The Home Office releases statistics quarterly on The Operation of Police Powers under the Terrorism Act 2000 and subsequent legislation. The most recent publication was released on 14 June 2018 and includes public statistics relating to sentence length of all offenders convicted under this Act since 2009-10 until 2017-18. These can be found using the following link: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attac hment_data/file/716000/police-powers-terrorism-mar2018-hosb0918.pdf. https://www.parliament.uk/business/publications/written-questions-answers- statements/written-question/Lords/2018-06-19/HL8798/ TOP 1 Israel Westminster Hall Debate UK-Israel Trade col 63WH Chris Green (Conservative): … The Prince’s visit to Israel last week was a strong symbolic sign that the relationship between our two great nations is better than ever.
    [Show full text]
  • Religious Right
    Is there a ‘Religious Right’ Emerging in Britain? Is there a ‘Religious Right’ Emerging in Britian? Andy Walton in Britian? Andy Emerging Right’ ‘Religious a Is there Recent years have seen an increasing number of This report gives a reliable overview of evidence claims that a US-style Religious Right either exists or concerning the purported rise of the Christian is rapidly emerging in Britain. This report examines Right in Britian. Drawing on new research, it profiles Is there a ‘Religious Right’ whether or not the claims are accurate. several new Christian groups. By placing them in context, it shows why rumours that an American- Superficially, it argues, the case looks quite strong: style movement is crossing the Atlantic are greatly there is evidence of greater co-ordination among exaggerated. Christian groups with a strong socially-conservative Emerging in Britain? commitment, in particular relating to human Linda Woodhead, Professor of Sociology of sexuality, marriage, family life, and religious freedom, Religion, Lancaster University about which they are vocal and often willing to resort to legal action. This is a familiar picture within US This is a measured and thoughtful piece of research, politics. contributing to a topic where there is too much heat Andy Walton and too little light in contemporary debate. It assesses However, on closer inspection, research and analysis the presence – or, rather, the current absence – of a suggest that it is highly misleading to describe this coherent ‘Religious Right’ in British politics through with phenomenon as a US-style Religious Right. For a a detailed comparison with the characteristics of the number of reasons – economic, social, ecclesiastical movement in the US.
    [Show full text]
  • 26/03/2015 Luciana Berger Written Question in Vitro Fertilisation 26/03
    Date Member(s) Type Topic (click for transcript) 26/03/2015 Luciana Berger Written Question In Vitro Fertilisation 26/03/2015 Fiona Bruce Written Question Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome 25/03/2015 Jim Dowd Written Question Domestic Violence 25/03/2015 Jim Shannon Written Question Contraceptives: Inflammatory Bowel Disease 25/03/2015 Andrew Smith Written Question Democratic Republic of Congo 25/03/2015 Nicholas Brown Written Question International Assistance 24/03/2015 Richard Fuller Written Question Immigrants: Pregnant Women 24/03/2015 Andrew Smith Written Question Rape: Democratic Republic of Congo 23/03/2015 Jamie Reed Written Question Midwives 23/03/2015 Fiona Bruce Written Question Abortion 20/03/2015 Fiona Bruce Written Question Contraceptives: Young People 20/03/2015 Fiona Bruce Written Question Contraceptives 18/03/2015 Mark Pawsey, Ann Clwyd, Malcolm Bruce, Valerie Vaz, Mary Oral Questions Female Genital Mutilation / Early Forced Marriage Macleod 18/03/2015 Graeme Morrice Early Day Motion Hormone Pregnancy Test Drugs 18/03/2015 Seema Malhotra Written Question Council of Europe Convention on Preventing and Combating Violence against Women and Domestic Violence 18/03/2015 Mike Freer Written Question Human Papillomavirus: Vaccination 17/03/2015 Frank Field, Emily Thornberry, Henry Smith, Fiona Mactaggart, Legislation Modern Slavery Bill [Consideration of Lords Amendments] David Burrowes, David Hanson, Michael Connarty, Mark Durkan, Caroline Spelman, Chloe Smith, Andrew Stunell, Caroline Nokes, Heather Wheeler, Paul Blomfield,
    [Show full text]
  • The Business Magazine for East Cheshire
    THE CHAMBER THE BUSINESS MAGAZINE FOR EAST CHESHIRE April 2013 / Issue 40 GOLF DAY FANtaSTIC EVENING at THIS 11TH JUNE 2013 YEARS BUSINESS AWARDS BUSINESS OF THE YEAR AWARD WINNERS 2013 - DIAMOND ELECTRONICS Fiona Bruce MP speaks about The Congleton Link Road in Parliament PARLIAMENtary DEbatE 2 - Patrons of the Chamber The Chamber Magazine www.eastcheshirechamber.co.uk Chairman’s Comments - 3 Patrons of the Chamber Meet the Chairman’s Chamber Team Comments This time last year I wrote in this column of the great success the Business Awards were and that they were the best awards night ever. I was wrong, because this year’s awards surpassed even last year’s success. The quality of this event continues to grow and one wonders Berisfords are the UK’s largest producer For all your PC & Laptop Repairs, Virus If you’re looking for BMW Sales, Service, of Ribbons, Bows and Trimmings. Innovation, Removal, Software Installations, Custom Parts or require an Approved body repair, what can be done to take it to another level. The answer, of course, Quality and Service are the key to their success PC Builds, Data Recovery and Hardware call into Blue Bell or visit is wait and see! Westfields, Middlewich Road, as one of the few remaining British Fitting, we’re here to help. www.thebluebellgroup.co.uk Sandbach, Cheshire CW11 1HZ Textile Manufacturers. Unit 1 Martin Court, West Street, Blue Bell BMW Crewe, Fourth Avenue, I would like to offer my congratulations to all of the winners and thank Tel: 0300 123 5500 PO Box 2, Thomas Street, Congleton, Cheshire CW12 1JR Weston Road, Crewe, Cheshire CW1 6XH everyone for taking part so enthusiastically in the Chambers big event of www.cheshireeast.gov.uk Marie Shenton David Watson Jackie Randles Congleton, Cheshire CW12 1EF Tel: 01260 280001 Tel: 01270 212525 Chairman Chief Executive Chamber Manager the year.
    [Show full text]
  • The Human Rights Implications of Brexit
    House of Commons House of Lords Joint Committee on Human Rights The human rights implications of Brexit Fifth Report of Session 2016–17 HL PAPER 88 HC 695 House of Commons House of Lords Joint Committee on Human Rights The human rights implications of Brexit Fifth Report of Session 2016–17 Report, together with formal minutes relating to the report Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed 14 December 2016 Ordered by the House of Lords to be printed 14 December 2016 HL PAPER 88 HC 695 Published on 19 December 2016 by authority of the House of Lords and House of Commons Joint Committee on Human Rights The Joint Committee on Human Rights is appointed by the House of Lords and the House of Commons to consider matters relating to human rights in the United Kingdom (but excluding consideration of individual cases); proposals for remedial orders, draft remedial orders and remedial orders. The Joint Committee has a maximum of six Members appointed by each House, of whom the quorum for any formal proceedings is two from each House. Current membership HOUSE OF COMMONS Ms Harriet Harman QC MP (Labour, Camberwell and Peckham) (Chair) Fiona Bruce MP (Conservative, Congleton) Ms Karen Buck MP (Labour, Westminster North) Jeremy Lefroy MP (Conservative, Stafford) Mark Pritchard MP (Conservative, The Wrekin) Amanda Solloway MP (Conservative, Derby North) HOUSE OF LORDS Baroness Hamwee (Liberal Democrat) Baroness Lawrence of Clarendon (Labour) Baroness Prosser (Labour) Lord Trimble (Conservative) Lord Woolf (Crossbench) Powers The Committee has the power to require the submission of written evidence and documents, to examine witnesses, to meet at any time (except when Parliament is prorogued or dissolved), to adjourn from place to place, to appoint specialist advisers, and to make Reports to both Houses.
    [Show full text]
  • Freedom, Responsibility and the State: Curbing Over-Mighty Government
    Freedom, Responsibility and the State Curbing Over-Mighty Government Jacob Rees -Mogg Martin Vickers Zac Goldsmith James Morris Jason McCartney John Stevenson Craig Whittaker Fiona Bruce Simon Reevell David Mowat Edited by Sheila Lawlor POLITEIA A FORUM FOR SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC THINKING POLITEIA A Forum for Social and Economic Thinking Politeia commissions and publishes discussions by specialists about social and economic ideas and policies. It aims to encourage public discussion on the relationship between the state and the people. Its aim is not to influence people to support any given political party, candidates for election, or position in a referendum, but to inform public discussion of policy. The forum is independently funded, and the publications do not express a corporate opinion, but the views of their individual authors. www.politeia.co.uk Freedom, Responsibility and the State Curbing Over-Mighty Government Jacob Rees-Mogg Martin Vickers Zac Goldsmith James Morris Jason McCartney John Stevenson Craig Whittaker Fiona Bruce Simon Reevell David Mowat Edited by Sheila Lawlor POLITEIA 2012 First published in 2012 by Politeia 33 Catherine Place London SW1E 6DY Tel. 0207 799 5034 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.politeia.co.uk © Politeia 2012 Series No. 79 ISBN 978-0-9571872-2-1 Cover design by John Marenbon Printed in Great Britain by: Blisset Bookbinders Roslin Road Acton, London W3 8DH THE AUTHORS* Jacob Rees-Mogg is MP for North East Somerset and a member of the Procedure and European Scrutiny Committees. Before entering Parliament he founded Somerset Capital Management, which he now runs. Martin Vickers is MP for Cleethorpes, having been a party agent and local councillor before that.
    [Show full text]
  • Fiona Bruce.Indd
    Fiona Bruce MP Congleton Coronavirus (COVID-19) Advice & Support Information It is right that the government has taken these unprecedented decisions and these extraordinary measures. Unless we get coronavirus under control then the danger is it will overwhelm all of our CORONAVIRUS vital services and cause much greater loss of life. PROTECT YOURSELF & OTHERS NEW RULES ON STAYING AT HOME AND AWAY FROM OTHERS Every citizen must comply with these new measures. The relevant NHS HEALTH INFORMATION AND ADVICE authorities, including the police, will be given the powers to enforce For the most up to date guidance please visit: them – including through fi nes and dispersing gatherings. The www.nhs.uk/conditions/coronavirus-covid-19/ Government will look again at these measures, and relax them if the evidence shows this is possible. You should only leave the house for Everyone must stay at home to help stop the spread of coronavirus. one of four reasons. This includes people of all ages – even if you do not have any 1. Shopping for basic necessities; food and medicine as infrequent symptoms or other health conditions. as possible. What to do if you have coronavirus symptoms 2. One form of exercise a day; a run, walk, or cycle - alone or with Continue to stay at home if you have either: members of your household. • a high temperature – this means you feel hot to touch on your 3. Any medical need, or to provide care or to help a vulnerable chest or back (you do not need to measure your temperature) person. • a new, continuous cough – this means coughing a lot for more 4.
    [Show full text]
  • The Implications for Scotland of Both the Strategic Defence and Security Review and the Comprehensive Spending Review
    House of Commons Scottish Affairs Committee The implications for Scotland of both the Strategic Defence and Security Review and The Comprehensive Spending Review Oral and written evidence Oral evidence taken and ordered by The House of Commons to be printed 3 November 2010 and 7 June 2011 HC 580 i-ii Published on 7 February 2012 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £8.50 The Scottish Affairs Committee The Scottish Affairs Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the expenditure, administration, and policy of the Scotland Office (including (i) relations with the Scottish Parliament and (ii) administration and expenditure of the offices of the Advocate General for Scotland (but excluding individual cases and advice given within government by the Advocate General)). Current membership Mr Ian Davidson (Labour/Co-op, Glasgow South West) (Chair) Fiona Bruce (Conservative, Congleton) Mike Freer (Conservative, Finchley and Golders Green) Jim McGovern (Labour, Dundee West) Iain McKenzie MP (Lab, Inverclyde) Graeme Morrice MP (Lab, Livingston) David Mowat (Conservative, Warrington South) Fiona O’Donnell (Labour, East Lothian) Simon Reevell (Conservative, Dewsbury) Mr Alan Reid (Liberal Democrat, Argyll and Bute) Lindsay Roy (Labour, Glenrothes) Dr Eilidh Whiteford (Scottish National Party, Banff and Buchan) The following members were also members of the committee during the Parliament: Cathy Jamieson (Labour/Co-op, Kilmarnock and Loudoun) Fiona O’Donnell (Labour, East Lothian) Mark Menzies (Conservative, Fylde) Julian Smith (Conservative, Skipton and Ripon) Powers The committee is one of the departmental select committees, the powers of which are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No.
    [Show full text]
  • Middlewich Road, Sandbach, Cheshire (Ref 10/3471C )
    Martyn Twigg Our Ref: APP/R0660/A/10/2141564 Fox Strategic Land and Property Ltd Your Ref: Gladman House Alexandria Way Congleton Cheshire CW12 1LB 17 October 2013 Dear Mr Twigg TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1990 - SECTION 78 APPEAL BY FOX STRATEGIC LAND AND PROPERTY LAND OFF ABBEY ROAD AND MIDDLEWICH ROAD, SANDBACH, CHESHIRE (REF 10/3471C ) 1. I am directed by the Secretary of State to refer to the report of the Inspector, Ruth V MacKenzie BA (Hons) MRTPI who held a public local inquiry on 19, 20 and 27 April 2011 into your client’s appeal under Section 78 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 against the decision of Cheshire East Council (the Council) to refuse outline planning permission for up to 280 dwellings, landscaping, open space, highways and associated works (ref.10/3471C). The Inspector recommended that the appeal be dismissed. The Inspector’s report accompanied the Secretary of State’s letter of 7 February 2013, which indicated that he was, in principle, minded to disagree with the Inspector’s recommendation and allow the appeal and grant planning permission, subject to the receipt of a satisfactory planning obligation to address the deficiencies related to affordable housing. He accordingly deferred his decision to enable the matter to be addressed. Inspector’s recommendation and summary of the decision 2. For the reasons set out in this letter the Secretary of State disagrees with the Inspector’s recommendation to dismiss the appeal. He allows the appeal and grants planning permission for the proposed development. This decision letter replaces the minded to letter of 7 February 2013.
    [Show full text]