DOCSLIB.ORG

Eruditio Ardescens an Inquiry in the Early Creed of Romans 1:3-4

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Eruditio Ardescens an Inquiry in the Early Creed of Romans 1:3-4 Eruditio Ardescens The Journal of Liberty Baptist Theological Seminary Volume 2 Issue 2 Article 4 2016 An Inquiry in the Early Creed of Romans 1:3-4: Does the Word ὉΡΙΖΩ Support an Adoptionistic Christianity? Nicholas Dodson Brian Scalise Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/jlbts Part of the Biblical Studies Commons, Christian Denominations and Sects Commons, Christianity Commons, Comparative Methodologies and Theories Commons, Ethics in Religion Commons, History of Christianity Commons, History of Religions of Eastern Origins Commons, History of Religions of Western Origin Commons, Liturgy and Worship Commons, Missions and World Christianity Commons, Practical Theology Commons, and the Religious Thought, Theology and Philosophy of Religion Commons Recommended Citation Dodson, Nicholas and Scalise, Brian (2016) "An Inquiry in the Early Creed of Romans 1:3-4: Does the Word ὉΡΙΖΩ Support an Adoptionistic Christianity?," Eruditio Ardescens: Vol. 2 : Iss. 2 , Article 4. Available at: https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/jlbts/vol2/iss2/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Scholars Crossing. It has been accepted for inclusion in Eruditio Ardescens by an authorized editor of Scholars Crossing. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Dodson and Scalise AN INQUIRY IN THE EARLY CREED OF ROMANS 1:3-4: DOES THE WORD ὉΡΙΖΩ SUPPORT AN ADOPTIONISTIC CHRISTIANITY? Nicholas Dodson and Brian Scalise1 INTRODUCTION It is not uncommon to consider Romans 1:3 – 4 to be a creed that predates its appearance in St. Paul’s Epistle to the Romans.2 Designated this way, these verses become a lens to visit what the earliest Christians believed about Jesus Christ. Within this creedal language, the Greek word ὁρίζω (appointed, decided, determined, demarcated) appears ambivalent about what it conveys concerning Jesus’ pre-incarnate divinity. This creedal text, from Romans 1:3 – 4 states: . περὶ τοῦ υἱοῦ αὐτοῦ τοῦ γενομένου ἐκ σπέρματος Δαυὶδ κατὰ σάρκα, τοῦ ὁρισθέντος υἱοῦ θεοῦ ἐν δυνάμει κατὰ πνεῦμα ἁγιωσύνης ἐξ ἀναστάσεως νεκρῶν, Ἰησοῦ Χριστοῦ τοῦ κυρίου ἡμῶν. concerning His Son, Jesus Christ our Lord, who (be)came from the seed of David according to the flesh, who was appointed the Son of God in power according to the Spirit of holiness out of [or “by”] the resurrection of the dead. If the meaning of ὁρίζω (ὁρισθέντος) remains ambivalent,3 then it is possible that the earliest Christians understood ὁρίζω to mean that, at some point in time, God “decided” to make Jesus 1 Nicholas Dodson is Assistant Professor of Biblical Language and Christian Studies at Truett-McConnell College and Instructor of Religion at Liberty University School of Divinity. Brian T. Scalise is Instructor of Apologetics and Theology at Liberty University School of Divinity 2 Grant R. Osborne, Romans, The IVP New Testament Commentary Series, eds. Grant R. Osborne, D. Stuart Briscoe, Haddon Robinson (Downers Grove: Intervarsity Press, 2004), Part 1, sec. 1, subsec. 2 (vv. 1:2 – 4); James D. G. Dunn, The Theology of Paul the Apostle (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1998), chap. 4, sec. 7:3; J. A. Fitzmyer, Romans (New York: Double Day, 1993), 229 – 230. 3 The following authors opt to translate for ὁρίζω with the significance of appointed, installed, or established, but without implying the connotation of adoptionism. Anders Nygren, Commentary on Romans (London: Augsburg Fortress, 1978); F. R. Fay and Christian Friedrich Kling Lange, The Epistle of Paul to the Romans (Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1976), chap. 1, I, vv. 1:3 – 4; R. C. H. Lenski, The Interpretation of St. Paul’s Epistle to the Romans (Minneapolis: Augsburg Publishing House, 1961), chap. 1, 4. Lenski prefers “ordained”; Notes for The NET Bible: a New Approach to Translation, Thoroughly Documented with 60,932 Notes by the Translators and Editors (Biblical Studies Press, L.L.C., 2005), “Notes on Romans,” part 1 (“Notes on Romans 1”), sec. 4 (“Notes for 1:4”). Logos Bible Software. The NET translators observe that Jesus was not just appointed the Son of God, but the Son-of-God-in-power. Royce Gordon Gruenler in Evangelical Commentary on the Bible makes the same point; Royce Gordon Gruenler, Evangelical Commenary on the Bible, ed. Walter Elwell (Grand Rapids: Baker, 1995), 1 Dodson and Scalise the Son of God. This would suggest that there was a very early tradition of adoptionism — believing that Jesus was a human who was adopted by God, becoming the Son of God.4 If, however, ὁρίζω means that God “demarcated” Jesus as the Son of God, then the orthodox position holds true; God merely shows Jesus to be the Son of God, or following a well- represented description, God “marks out” Jesus as the eternal divine Son.5 To contribute to this conversation, we narrow attention to ὁρίζω’s usage in the Old Testament Apocrypha, Pseudepigrapha, and the Septuagint in order to delimit its semantic value for evaluating its meaning in Romans 1:3 – 4. Although the New Testament’s usage of ὁρίζω is important, if Romans 1:3 – 4 was part of early Christian worship and therefore predates the New Testament’s writing, investigating ὁρίζω’s meanings antecedent to its usage in early Christian worship correctly situates the term’s usage historically.6 “Romans,” part I, b; Albert L. Lukaszewski, The Lexham Greek New Testament: Expansions and Annotations, eds. Albert L. Lukaszewski, Mark Dubis, and J. Ted Blakley (Logos Research Systems, 2010), “Romans 1:4.”; Dunn, Theology of Paul, chap. 4, sec.10. 3. Dunn argues directly against adoptionism. 4 Ernst Käsemann, Commentary on Romans, trans. Geoffrey W. Bromiley (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1994), 11 – 12; L. Gaston, Paul and the Torah (Vancouver: University of British Columbia, 1987), 113, n.1; Bart D. Ehrman, Did Jesus Exist?: The Historical Argument for Jesus of Nazareth, (New York: HarperOne, 2012), 111. Paul supposedly corrects the creed when he uses it, which accounts for Paul being consistent in the Book of Romans with his own view of Christ as preincarnately divine but suggests that Paul is subtly trying to change the Roman Christians’ mind on the matter with very minute changes: 1) the addition of ἐν δυνάμει, “in power,” and 2) the lead, in … περὶ τοῦ υἱοῦ αὐτοῦ, “…concerning God’s Son.” 5 Translations and scholars who opt for the denotation of “mark out” or “demarcate” follow. Revised Standard Version; New American Standard Bible; New English Bible; Good News Bible; Edgar J. Goodspeed: The New Testament: an American Translation (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1923); N. T. Wright, The Resurrection of the Son of God, Vol. 3 of Christian Origins and the Question of God, (Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 2003), 243; Leon Morris, The Epistle to the Romans, The Pillar New Testament Commentary, ed. D. A. Carson (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1988), I, A, 4. Logos Bible Software; Robert Mounce, Romans, Vol. 27 of The New American Commentary, eds. Ray Clendenen, Kenneth Matthews, David Dockery, L. Russ Bush, Duane Garrett, Larry Walker, Richard Melick Jr., Paige Patterson, Curtis Vaughan, Linda Scott, and Marc Jolley (Nashville: Broadman & Holman, 1995), I, 1, 1:3 – 4. Logos Bile Software; Barclay Newman and Eugene Nida, Romans: a Translator’s Handbook on Paul’s Letter to the Romans (New York: United Bible Societies, 1973), chap. 1, Rom. 1:3b – 4; Marvin R. Vincent, Word Studies in the New Testament, Vol. 3 of 4 (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1985), chap. 1, 4; Grant R. Osborne, Romans, Part 1, sec. 1, subsec. 2 (vv. 1:2 – 4). Logos Bible Software; John R. W. Stott, Romans: Good News for the World. The Bible Speaks Today (Downers Grove: Intervarsity Press, 1994), 50; Max Zerwick S. J., trans., revised, and adapted by Mary Grosvenor, Analysis Philologica Novi Testamenti Graeci [A Grammatical Analysis of the Greek New Testament], unabridged, 5th, rev. ed. (Rome: Editrice Pontificio Istituto Biblico Roma, 1996), “Romans,” v. 4. 6 Lk. 22:22, Acts 2:23, 10:42, 11:29, 17:26, 31, Rom. 1:4, Heb. 4:7. 2 Dodson and Scalise Analyzing ὁρίζω’s semantic domain in this extra-canonical literature and the Septuagint along with its syntactical constructions will give a certain range of possibilities, either strengthening or weakening the adoptionistic thesis.7 This delimiting of ὁρίζω by inquiry into these sources acts as a supplement for what already exists on the topic. In the Old Testament Apocrypha, forms of ὁρίζω appear only in 3 Maccabees. The Old Testament Pseudepigrapha contains seven occurrences: three times in the Sibylline Oracle and once each in 1 Enoch, Apocalypse of Moses, Prayer of Manasseh, and History of the Rechabites. There are nineteen occurrences in the Septuagint (LXX hereafter). Three denotations for ὁρίζω exist in this literature as demonstrable in what follows. DETERMINING FOR ONESELF 3 MACCABEES 5:42 Ὅθεν ὁ κατὰ πάντα Φάλαρις βασιλεὺς ἐνπληθυνθεὶς ἀλογιστίας, καὶ τὰς γινομένας πρὸς ἐπισκοπὴν τῶν Ἰουδαίων ἐν αὐτῷ μεταβολὰς τῆς ψυχῆς παρ᾽ οὐδὲν ἡγούμενος, ἀτελέστατον βεβαίως ὅρκον ὁρισάμενος τούτους μὲν ἀνυπερθέτως πέμψειν εἰς ᾅδην ἐν γόνασιν καὶ ποσὶν θηρίων ᾐκισμένους, The king, just like another Phalaris, a prey to thoughtlessness, made no account of the changes which his own mind had undergone, issuing in the deliverance of the Jews. He swore a fruitless oath, and determined forthwith to send them to Hades, crushed by the knees and feet of the elephants.8 Here, the aorist, middle participle, ὁρισάμενος, is functioning as an independent participle (i.e., like a finite indicative verb). Independent verbal participles trace to Semitic influence and, so, it is not impossible that an independent verbal participle would be seen here in 3 Maccabees. However, as they are quite rare, it could be seen as an adverbial participle, rendered, “. indeed firmly determining with an oath to send them forthwith into Hades . 7 Many scholars have increasingly begun to treat the Old Testament Apocrypha and Pseudepigrapha as valuable for New Testament research.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Romans 8:1 Commentary
    Romans 8:1 Commentary PREVIOUS NEXT Click chart to enlarge Chart from recommended resource Jensen's Survey of the NT - used by permission Romans Overview Chart - Charles Swindoll Source: Dr David Cooper Click to Enlarge ROMANS ROAD to RIGHTEOUSNESS Romans 1:18-3:20 Romans 3:21-5:21 Romans 6:1-8:39 Romans 9:1-11:36 Romans 12:1-16:27 SIN SALVATION SANCTIFICATION SOVEREIGNTY SERVICE NEED WAY LIFE SCOPE SERVICE FOR OF OF OF OF SALVATION SALVATION SALVATION SALVATION SALVATION God's Holiness God's Grace God's Power God's Sovereignty Gods Glory In In In In The Condemning Justifying Sanctifying Saving Object of Sin Sinners Believers Jew and Gentile Service Deadliness Design Demonstration of Salvation of Sin of Grace Power Given Promises Fulfilled Paths Pursued Righteousness Righteousness Righteousness Righteousness Righteousness Needed Credited Demonstrated Restored to Israel Applied God's Righteousness God's Righteousness God's Righteousness God's Righteousness God's Righteousness IN LAW IMPUTED OBEYED IN ELECTION DISPLAYED Slaves to Sin Slaves to God Slaves Serving God Doctrine Duty Life by Faith Service by Faith Modified from Irving L. Jensen's chart above R Ruin (Romans 1:17 – 3:20) – The utter sinfulness of humanity O Offer (Romans 3:21-31) – God’s offer of justification by grace M Model (Romans 4:1-25) – Abraham as a model for saving faith A Access (Romans 5:1-11) – The benefits of justification N New Adam (Romans 5:12-21) – We are children of two “Adams” S Struggle w/ Sin (Romans 6:1-8:39) Struggle, sanctification, and victory Romans 8:1 Therefore there is now no condemnation for those who are in Christ Jesus.
    [Show full text]
  • Early Church Fathers and Adoptionism
    Early Church Fathers and Adoptionism Sample statements Because of the nature of adoptionism its central question inevitably is when did humanity blend with divinity? (All emphasis added). Shepherd of Hermas (dated from AD 85-165) "The Holy Pre-existent Spirit. Which created the whole creation, God made to dwell in flesh that he desired. This flesh, therefore, in which the Holy Spirit dwelt, was subject unto the Spirit, walking honorably in holiness and purity, without in any way defiling the Spirit. When then it had lived honorably in chastity, and had labored with the Spirit, and had cooperated with it in everything, behaving itself boldly and bravely, he chose it as a partner with the Holy Spirit; for the career of this flesh pleased [the Lord], seeing that, as possessing the Holy Spirit, it was not defiled upon the earth. He therefore took the son as adviser and the glorious angels also, that this flesh too, having served the Spirit unblamably, might have some place of sojourn, and might not seem to have lost the reward for its service; for all flesh, which is found undefiled and unspotted, wherein the Holy Spirit dwelt, shall receive a reward." Theodotus via Hippolytus of Rome (d. AD 235) Refutation of All Heresies, Book VII, Chapter 23. “The Heresy of Theodotus” “But there was a certain Theodotus, a native of Byzantium, who introduced a novel heresy. He announces tenets concerning the originating cause of the universe, which are partly in keeping with the doctrines of the true Church, in so far as he acknowledges that all things were created by God.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Ted Kirnbauer Romans 16 9/2/18 Chapter 16 Is Paul's Conclusion To
    1 Ted Kirnbauer Romans 16 9/2/18 Chapter 16 is Paul’s conclusion to this great letter and his personal greetings and commendations to individuals he knows in Rome. Many in this list of names are only mentioned here, but even this teaches us many things about the infant church and culture into which it was born. In chapter 15 Paul had spoken of a mutual indebtedness among believers. The Gentiles were indebted to the Jewish believers for the salvation they enjoyed, so they gave a financial gift to help the Jewish Christians in Rome who were destitute (15:27). By receiving the gift, the Jews would then be indebted to the Gentile believers for their help. This is part of the beauty of the church. The church is a gathering of people who depend on one another. In Romans 15:5–7 Paul said, “May the God who gives perseverance and encouragement grant you to be of the same mind with one another according to Christ Jesus, so that with one accord you may with one voice glorify the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ. Therefore, accept one another, just as Christ also accepted us to the glory of God.” In Romans 16, this theme is applied to specific individuals. In this passage, Paul mentions 26 individuals, two families, and possibly three house churches (it is unclear what “those of Aristobulus” [16:10] and “those of Narcissus” [16:11] refer to. Although most translations insert the words, “of the household of” or “of the family of,” those additions are not present in the original Greek.
    [Show full text]
  • Romans 7: an Old Covenant Struggle Seen Through New Covenant Eyes
    MSJ 30/2 (Fall 2019) 277–302 ROMANS 7: AN OLD COVENANT STRUGGLE SEEN THROUGH NEW COVENANT EYES Jay Street, ThM The Master’s Seminary Romans 7 is possibly one of the most cherished texts in church history. But it is also one of the most controversial passages in Scripture. Many resonate with Paul’s ambivalence and insist that Paul is speaking about the Christian’s daily struggle with sin. Others strongly disagree and purport that Paul’s struggle is too defeating for the Christian life, and he must be speaking for unbelievers. However, it will be argued in this article that both sides of the debate have been speaking past each other for centuries because both sides are asking the wrong question. This is not a passage about whether Paul is speaking as a Christian or not, but whether Paul is speaking as someone under the Old Covenant or the New Covenant. Thus, when the reader’s perspective is properly adjusted, he can rightly ascertain Paul’s spiritual status in the passage—Paul is speaking as a believer under the Old Covenant before the inauguration of the New Covenant. * * * * * Introduction Most people do not realize it, but their vision is clouded. This is not referring to physical blindness or short-sightedness, but to the popular evangelical perception of one biblical passage—Romans 7:14–25. Today, this text is as popular as it is contro- versial.1 Not only is the passage well-known, it has actually been one of the most cherished biblical texts in history. This is especially the case for those who have ad- vocated that Romans 7 conveys the Christian’s battle with sin, because many have discovered an inviting home in this emotional, heart-wrenching text.
    [Show full text]
  • Wesleyan Spirit-Christology
    Wesleyan Spirit-Christology: inspiration from the theology of Samuel Chadwick Full version of a paper presented at the Oxford Institute of Methodist Theological Studies, August 2018 by George Bailey, [email protected] Lecturer in Mission and Wesleyan Studies, Cliff College, Derbyshire, UK Presbyteral Minister in Leeds North and East Methodist Circuit, UK Introduction This paper explores the theology of Samuel Chadwick (1860-1932) and demonstrates that within it there is a Spirit Christology in a Wesleyan framework. Spirit Christology has been the subject of theological investigation in recent decades, with proposals being made for ways to add to or adapt the more dominant Logos Christologies of the Western theological tradition so that the work of the Holy Spirit in Jesus in the Gospels, and in the experience of Christians, can be better accounted for.1 Chadwick’s theology is brought into debate with this more recent conversation, and is found to be in many ways in line with the Spirit Christology being proposed. This is not an aspect of Chadwick’s theology that has been given attention previously and new suggestions are made as to his place in the tradition of Wesleyan theology. In the process, Chadwick’s sources are considered, including the ways that he draws on a Wesleyan theology of perfection, mid to late nineteenth century language of Pentecost and baptism of the Spirit, early twentieth century liberal Protestant theological work, and his potential relationship with the seventeenth century puritan, John Owen. Most academic interest in Chadwick to date has focused on more practical issues. However, although Chadwick was primarily concerned with holiness and evangelism, it was only by the work of Holy Spirit that he experienced these being effective in his life and the life of churches, and consequently the Holy Spirit constituted the main content of his teaching to prepare people for evangelism.
    [Show full text]
  • Romans 7 Pastor Jeremy Cagle, March 18, 2018
    Romans 7 Pastor Jeremy Cagle, March 18, 2018 Go ahead and turn in your Bibles to the book of Romans. And as you're doing that this morning, we're in a series called "The Book of Romans in Three Months", where we're looking at the Book of Romans over a three month, or 12-week period of time. We're surveying the book and flying over it so you can get the big picture. And the big picture of Romans is this, Jesus saves sinners. The big idea of the book is found in chapter 1, verse 18, if you want to look there with me. Paul writes and he says, "For I am not ashamed of the gospel. For it is the power of God for salvation to everyone who believes." Romans is about the power of God for salvation. It's about the gospel, or the good news, and its ability to change lives. In the 1800s, a painting was found in an art gallery in Chicago called "The Rock of Ages," which showed a person clinging to a cross that was firmly embedded in a rock. And as the wind and the waves beat against him, and the ocean crashed at his feet, the man was saved. That's what the book of Romans is about. It's about clinging to the Rock of ages and being delivered. It's about being saved from the storm. I don't have to ask you whether you're in a storm this morning. I'm guessing that you are.
    [Show full text]
  • Early-Christianity-Timeline.Pdf
    Pagan Empire Christian Empire 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 1 AD Second 'Bishop' of Rome. Pupil of Student of Polycarp. First system- Bishop of Nyssa, brother of Basil. Pope. The Last Father of the Peter. Author of a letter to Corinth, atic theologian, writing volumi- Bishop of Original and sophisticated theologi- model of St Gregory the Church. First of the St John of (1 Clement), the earliest Christian St Clement of Rome nously about the Gospels and the St Irenaeus St Cyprian Carthage. an, writing on Trinitarian doctrine Gregory of Nyssa an ideal Scholastics. Polymath, document outside the NT. church, and against heretics. and the Nicene creed. pastor. Great monk, and priest. Damascus Former disciple of John the Baptist. Prominent Prolific apologist and exegete, the Archbishop of Constantinople, St Leo the Pope. Able administrator in very Archbishop of Seville. Encyclopaedist disciple of Jesus, who became a leader of the most important thinker between Paul brother of Basil. Greatest rhetorical hard times, asserter of the prima- and last great scholar of the ancient St Peter Judean and later gentile Christians. Author of two St Justin Martyr and Origen, writing on every aspect stylist of the Fathers, noted for St Gregory Nazianzus cy of the see of Peter. Central to St Isidore world, a vital link between the learning epistles. Source (?) of the Gospel of Mark. of life, faith and worship. writing on the Holy Spirit. Great the Council of Chalcedon. of antiquity and the Middle Ages. Claimed a knowledge and vision of Jesus independent Pupil of Justin Martyr. Theologian.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecumenical Councils Preparing for Next Week (Disciple 6–Eucharist 1)
    January St. Dominic’s RCIA Program Disciple The Church: 15 History & Teaching 4 Goal • Having switched the Disciple 4 & 5 weeks, we looks at an overview of the Sacraments last week (Disciple 5), and explored the Sacraments of Baptism and Confirmation. These Sacraments are two of the three that initiate us into the Church community, and into Christ’s body and mission. This week we’ll continue to unpack the meaning of Church by looking broadly at its history one the last 2000 years. We’ll also explore it’s role as Teacher. How does the Church function in and through history? How does God walk with the Church through it all? Agenda • Welcome/Housekeeping (10) • Questions & Answers • Introduction to the Rosary (15) Discussion (15): • If the Church is The Body of Christ, what does this mean for Christ’s presence in the world through history and in the world today? • What do I admire about the Catholic Church’s activity in history? Does any part of the Church’s activity in history disturb or upset me? • How do I (might I) listen to what the Church has to say today? What is my approach/attitude to the Church as “Teacher”? • Presentation: The Church: History (35) • Break (10) • Presentation: The Church: Teaching & Belief (30) • Discussion (time permitting): • What is special to this moment in history? • What is the Good News of Christ & the Church that speaks to this moment in history? • How can the body of Christ proclaim & witness the Gospel and walk with others today? Housekeeping Notes • Rite of Acceptance: February 10th at the 11:30am and 5:30 Masses.
    [Show full text]
  • Romans 1 8-17 How to Impact Your World for Christ 6 17 18
    Romans 1:8-17 How To Impact Your World For Christ WREFC 6/17/18 In 1903, a group of seventeen men got together to form a new political organization. By 1917, this group of seventeen had grown to 40,000. They became powerful enough to overthrow the Czar of Russia. Before the Berlin Wall fell in 1989, communism dominated up to two-thirds of the globe. We still must ask ourselves how seventeen men made such an impact upon the world in less than 75 years. I believe the answer is simple: The men who founded the Communist Party were committed to the philosophical teachings of Karl Marx. They had no plan B. They were sold-out. Nothing was going to deter them in their cause to spread the atheistic gospel of dialectical materialism. I want to ask you some very important questions this morning: Are you a person who longs to impact your world for Jesus Christ? Are you sold out to spreading the gospel of biblical Christianity? I suspect that some of you are tired of going through the motions at church? Maybe you feel unfulfilled in your job. Perhaps you’re bored with retirement. You’re thinking “There’s got to me more to life than what I’m doing now.” I’m convinced that the Lord is looking for men and women who yearn for a satisfying and fulfilling mission in life. If you are a FAT person, God can use you in ministry. And by FAT, I mean F.A.T. as in Faithful, Available, and Teachable.
    [Show full text]
  • This Worldwide Movement // Romans 16 // Romans # 31
    This Worldwide Movement // The whole letter is worth a read, but one of my favorite sections reads like this: Romans 16 // Romans # 31 I was initially disappointed at being categorized as an extremist, [but] as I continued to think about the matter I gradually gained a measure Martin Luther King Day of satisfaction from the label. This weekend is MLK Day--a time where we celebrate, remember, and Was not Jesus an extremist for love? “Love your enemies, bless them prayerfully continue to pursue the legacy Dr. King championed. that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully use you, and persecute you.” In April 1963, Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. sat in a small, solitary jail cell in Birmingham, and it’s there he penned his now famous “Letter from a Was not Amos an extremist for justice? “Let justice roll down like Birmingham Jail.” Dr. King’s letter confronted inaction and passivity with waters and righteousness like an ever-flowing stream.” the authority of a biblical worldview, particularly one shaped by the gospel. We often talk about Dr. King’s vision of racial equality. But “Letter from a Was not Paul an extremist for the gospel? “I bear in my body the marks Birmingham Jail” reminds us that this wasn’t Dr. King’s vision. It was God’s of the Lord Jesus.” vision. Was not Martin Luther an extremist for justification by faith? “Here I Dr. King called for an end to racial injustice not by appealing to political stand; I cannot do otherwise.
    [Show full text]
  • Trinitarian/Christological Heresies Heresy Description Origin Official
    Trinitarian/Christological Heresies Official Heresy Description Origin Other Condemnation Adoptionism Belief that Jesus Propounded Theodotus was Alternative was born as a by Theodotus of excommunicated names: Psilanthro mere (non-divine) Byzantium , a by Pope Victor and pism and Dynamic man, was leather merchant, Paul was Monarchianism. [9] supremely in Rome c.190, condemned by the Later criticized as virtuous and that later revived Synod of Antioch presupposing he was adopted by Paul of in 268 Nestorianism (see later as "Son of Samosata below) God" by the descent of the Spirit on him. Apollinarism Belief proposed Declared to be . that Jesus had by Apollinaris of a heresy in 381 by a human body Laodicea (died the First Council of and lower soul 390) Constantinople (the seat of the emotions) but a divine mind. Apollinaris further taught that the souls of men were propagated by other souls, as well as their bodies. Arianism Denial of the true The doctrine is Arius was first All forms denied divinity of Jesus associated pronounced that Jesus Christ Christ taking with Arius (ca. AD a heretic at is "consubstantial various specific 250––336) who the First Council of with the Father" forms, but all lived and taught Nicea , he was but proposed agreed that Jesus in Alexandria, later exonerated either "similar in Christ was Egypt . as a result of substance", or created by the imperial pressure "similar", or Father, that he and finally "dissimilar" as the had a beginning declared a heretic correct alternative. in time, and that after his death. the title "Son of The heresy was God" was a finally resolved in courtesy one.
    [Show full text]
  • One Hour in Romans” As a Survey Lesson to Give You a Broad Brush Over the Book As Foundation to the More In-Depth Study of Romans on Our Bible Bus Journey
    DR. J. VERNON MCGEE BEFORE YOU BEGIN You are about to spend time in one of the most important books of the Bible. For many in every generation, God has used this book of Romans to change thinking, deepen faith, and comfort hearts. It could be that God will use this study in your life to teach, comfort, convict, encourage, or stir you towards a deeper faith in Him and greater effectiveness in living the Christian life. Before you dive in, ask Him to do that right now. Pause as you begin and ask Him to quiet your heart and awaken your mind to the greatest subject of the ages: His great salvation. Invite Him to do whatever work He wants in your heart as you discover the depth of this eternal truth. Dr. McGee believed the book of Romans to be so important, he didn’t want you to miss anything God has for you in its pages. He prepared this “One Hour in Romans” as a survey lesson to give you a broad brush over the book as foundation to the more in-depth study of Romans on our Bible Bus journey. We’ve also added a few questions at the end of each section to encourage you to stop and ask—“What did I just learn?” and “How might God want me to apply this to my life?” These prompts can be engaged with individually or as a group. If you’ve been on the Bible Bus for long, you know that in the beginning of every complete journey through the whole Word of God, Dr.
    [Show full text]