Cabinet Manual 2017
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Cabinet Office Consultation on 'Better Use of Data in Government
Cabinet Office consultation on ‘Better use of data in government’ Response from the CLOSER Consortium CLOSER (Cohorts and Longitudinal Studies Enhancement Resources) is funded by the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) and Medical Research Council (MRC) to maximise the use, value and impact of the UK’s longitudinal studies. The network brings together eight leading longitudinal studies, the British Library and the UK Data Archive. CLOSER’s response to the consultation predominantly reflects our interest in being able to link individual administrative records to longitudinal survey data collected from that same individual. The linking of these two forms of data offers potential that exceeds the sum of the two approaches in isolation. While administrative records can provide enviable coverage and frequency, they rarely provide the richness and depth that comes from survey data collected to tackle specific research questions; conversely, survey data collection can be costly and challenging to administer, leading to missing data and possible biases which can be overcome by using administrative records to fill in the missing information. Consequently, combining the two can yield considerable benefits. For example, recent analysis of the National Pupil Database (NPD) and Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA) found higher participation rates in higher education among a range of groups including ethnic-minorities.1 However, those records could not help explain these differences in participation; exploring this required linking individual -
The Constitutional Role of the Privy Council and the Prerogative 3
Foreword The Privy Council is shrouded in mystery. As Patrick O’Connor points out, even its statutory definition is circular: the Privy Council is defined by the Interpretation Act 1978 as the members of ‘Her Majesty’s Honourable Privy Council’. Many people may have heard of its judicial committee, but its other roles emerge from the constitutional fog only occasionally – at their most controversial, to dispossess the Chagos Islanders of their home, more routinely to grant a charter to a university. Tracing its origin back to the twelfth or thirteen century, its continued existence, if considered at all, is regarded as vaguely charming and largely formal. But, as the vehicle that dispossessed those living on or near Diego Garcia, the Privy Council can still display the power that once it had more widely as an instrument of feudal rule. Many of its Orders in Council bypass Parliament but have the same force as democratically passed legislation. They are passed, unlike such legislation, without any express statement of compatibility with the European Convention on Human Rights. What is more, Orders in Council are not even published simultaneously with their passage. Two important orders relating to the treatment of the Chagos Islanders were made public only five days after they were passed. Patrick, originally inspired by his discovery of the essay that the great nineteenth century jurist Albert Venn Dicey wrote for his All Souls Fellowship, provides a fascinating account of the history and continuing role of the Privy Council. He concludes by arguing that its role, and indeed continued existence, should be subject to fundamental review. -
Product Catalog | Volume 2 | Volume Catalog Product
Product Catalog | Volume 2 Catalog | Volume Product Hirsh® Product Catalog | Volume 2 Advantages Of Hirsh Products Hirsh Industries, LLC manufactures and supplies metal filing, storage and organizational products for personal and commercial use. We have a storage solution for any office need. Our products work together to provide a comprehensive, functional and stylish storage system. Hirsh has had an aggressive growth strategy through investment and expansion both organically as well as through acquisitions. Our expanding portfolio of value engineered products have applications in government, education and business markets. We pride ourselves on providing quality products that represent outstanding value to end users, supply chain excellence and world class customer service. Founded In 1924 A Broad Assortment Of Products Hirsh Industries has Commercial Grade File Cabinets operated continuously Hirsh’s commercial grade filing products offer premium features and unmatched value. since 1924 when it With added functionality and ergonomic design, these cabinets are welcome additions began as the W.P. to any office. All of our cabinets are built of steel and feature ball-bearing slides providing a long-lasting and durable product made for high-volume, daily use. Hirsh’s broad line of Johnson Company file cabinets include vertical, lateral and pedestal files. Affordable prices make these filing which specialized in products a great value and smart choice. Unmatched Value Quality Construction Premium Features metal fabrication. W.P. Johnson eventually Credenza Cabinets For small or large offices, the combination of our credenza cabinets offer a variety of open Practical solutions with Durable desking and Thoughtful designs narrowed its focus and closed configurations that support accessible and secured storage solutions. -
Justice Joe Williams
Managing the collision between two worlds First Law of Aotearoa 1200-1840 . Kupe’s laws . Adapted to new conditions . A system of values and principles for the organisation and administration of kin communities . Whanaungatanga – centrality of kinship and careful attention to relationships . Mana – principles of leadership and individual dignity . Tapu – behavioural control and sacred/ profane divide . Utu – reciprocity obligation . Kaitiakitanga – obligation to care for one’s own Flexible and consensus based within a system that naturally defers to mana and collective will Second Law of New Zealand 1840-1985 . Central authority with unrelated officials dispensing its law . Individual dignity and autonomy of subjects/ citizens . Economic and some social relationships among people defined by contract . Relationships with the environment, moveables and (eventually) intangibles defined through concept of property First and Second Laws collide . Treaty is a legal nullity – Māori rights are statutory only; otherwise Crown ‘of necessity is to be the sole arbiter of its own justice’ . Native title not justiciable except through statute – recognition conditional on detribalisation of title . Recognition of tikanga is temporary expedient on a linear path to extinction and assimilation – NLC applies custom to extinguish it; quasi custom RM courts eventually abolished; autonomous native districts under s 71 Constitution Act never implemented Whanaungatanga . Whanaungatanga rendered redundant as determinant of rights . Property rights take over . Whanaungatanga removed as a driver of wealth . Wage labour takes over . Whanaungatanga removed as a mechanism of social control . Police and the courts take over Third Law of Aotearoa-New Zealand 1985-present New legal culture in which tikanga mainstreamed . Reinvention of Treaty as creature of law and Treaty settlement process created – Waitangi Tribunal . -
Boston Symphony Orchestra Concert Programs, Summer, 2001, Tanglewood
SEMI OIAWA MUSIC DIRECTOR BERNARD HAITINK PRINCIPAL GUEST CONDUCTOR • i DALE CHIHULY INSTALLATIONS AND SCULPTURE / "^ik \ *t HOLSTEN GALLERIES CONTEMPORARY GLASS SCULPTURE ELM STREET, STOCKBRIDGE, MA 01262 . ( 41 3.298.3044 www. holstenga I leries * Save up to 70% off retail everyday! Allen-Edmoi. Nick Hilton C Baccarat Brooks Brothers msSPiSNEff3svS^:-A Coach ' 1 'Jv Cole-Haan v2^o im&. Crabtree & Evelyn OB^ Dansk Dockers Outlet by Designs Escada Garnet Hill Giorgio Armani .*, . >; General Store Godiva Chocolatier Hickey-Freeman/ "' ft & */ Bobby Jones '.-[ J. Crew At Historic Manch Johnston & Murphy Jones New York Levi's Outlet by Designs Manchester Lion's Share Bakery Maidenform Designer Outlets Mikasa Movado Visit us online at stervermo OshKosh B'Gosh Overland iMrt Peruvian Connection Polo/Ralph Lauren Seiko The Company Store Timberland Tumi/Kipling Versace Company Store Yves Delorme JUh** ! for Palais Royal Phone (800) 955 SHOP WS »'" A *Wtev : s-:s. 54 <M 5 "J* "^^SShfcjiy ORIGINS GAUCftV formerly TRIBAL ARTS GALLERY, NYC Ceremonial and modern sculpture for new and advanced collectors Open 7 Days 36 Main St. POB 905 413-298-0002 Stockbridge, MA 01262 Seiji Ozawa, Music Director Ray and Maria Stata Music Directorship Bernard Haitink, Principal Guest Conductor One Hundred and Twentieth Season, 2000-2001 SYMPHONY HALL CENTENNIAL SEASON Trustees of the Boston Symphony Orchestra, Inc. Peter A. Brooke, Chairman Dr. Nicholas T. Zervas, President Julian Cohen, Vice-Chairman Harvey Chet Krentzman, Vice-Chairman Deborah B. Davis, Vice-Chairman Vincent M. O'Reilly, Treasurer Nina L. Doggett, Vice-Chairman Ray Stata, Vice-Chairman Harlan E. Anderson John F. Cogan, Jr. Edna S. -
DEPA Treaty of Waitangi New Zealand August 2019
DEPA IN CONFIDENCE Digital Economy Partnership Agreement (DEPA) Non-Paper from New Zealand: The Treaty of Waitangi August 2019 Text for DEPA: Treaty of Waitangi 1. Provided that such measures are not used as a means of arbitrary or unjustified discrimination against persons of the other Parties or as a disguised restriction on trade in goods, trade in services and investment, nothing in this Agreement shall preclude the adoption by New Zealand of measures it deems necessary to accord more favourable treatment to Maori in respect of matters covered by this Agreement, including in fulfilment of its obligations under the Treaty of Waitangi. 2. The Parties agree that the interpretation of the Treaty of Waitangi, including as to the nature of the rights and obligations arising under it, shall not be subject to the dispute settlement provisions of this Agreement. [Cross reference TBC] shall otherwise apply to this Article. A panel established under [Cross reference TBC] may be requested to determine only whether any measure referred to in paragraph 1 is inconsistent with a Party’s rights under this Agreement. Note that the text used for DEPA is the same as text in the P4, CPTPP and Singapore- New Zealand FTA but would be updated if no dispute settlement provisions. Summary The Treaty of Waitangi (the Treaty) is a founding document of New Zealand of the greatest constitutional importance. The Treaty provides a framework for the ongoing relationship of partnership between the Crown (represented by the Government of New Zealand) and Māori, the indigenous people of New Zealand. As part of the principle of partnership between the two signatories of the Treaty, it is important that recognition be given to the special place of the Treaty in New Zealand. -
Page 1 Halsbury's Laws of England (3) RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE
Page 1 Halsbury's Laws of England (3) RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE CROWN AND THE JUDICIARY 133. The monarch as the source of justice. The constitutional status of the judiciary is underpinned by its origins in the royal prerogative and its legal relationship with the Crown, dating from the medieval period when the prerogatives were exercised by the monarch personally. By virtue of the prerogative the monarch is the source and fountain of justice, and all jurisdiction is derived from her1. Hence, in legal contemplation, the Sovereign's Majesty is deemed always to be present in court2 and, by the terms of the coronation oath and by the maxims of the common law, as also by the ancient charters and statutes confirming the liberties of the subject, the monarch is bound to cause law and justice in mercy to be administered in all judgments3. This is, however, now a purely impersonal conception, for the monarch cannot personally execute any office relating to the administration of justice4 nor effect an arrest5. 1 Bac Abr, Prerogative, D1: see COURTS AND TRIBUNALS VOL 24 (2010) PARA 609. 2 1 Bl Com (14th Edn) 269. 3 As to the duty to cause law and justice to be executed see PARA 36 head (2). 4 2 Co Inst 187; 4 Co Inst 71; Prohibitions del Roy (1607) 12 Co Rep 63. James I is said to have endeavoured to revive the ancient practice of sitting in court, but was informed by the judges that he could not deliver an opinion: Prohibitions del Roy (1607) 12 Co Rep 63; see 3 Stephen's Commentaries (4th Edn) 357n. -
British Reaction to the Sepoy Mutiny, 1857-1858 Approved
BRITISH REACTION TO THE SEPOY MUTINY, 1857-1858 APPROVED: Major /Professor mor Frotessar of History Dean' ot the GraduatGradua' e ScHooT* BRITISH REACTION TO THE SEPOY MUTINY, 1857-185S THESIS Presented to the Graduate Council of the North Texas State University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS By Samuel Shafeeq Denton, Texas August, 1970 PREFACE English and Indian historians have devoted considerable research and analysis to the genesis of the Sepoy Mutiny of 1857 but have ignored contemporary British reaction to it, a neglect which this study attempts to satisfy. After the initial, spontaneous, condemnation of Sepoy atrocities, Queen Victoria, her Parliament, and subjects took a more rational and constructive attitude toward the insurrection in India, which stemmed primarily from British interference in Indian religious and social customs, symbolized by the cartridge issue. Englishmen demanded reform, and Parliament-- at once anxious to please the electorate and to preserve the valuable colony of India--complied within a year, although the Commons defeated the first two Indian bills, because of the interposition of other foreign and domestic problems. But John Bright, Lord Edward Stanley, William Gladstone, Benjamin Disraeli, and their friends joined forces to pass the third Indian bill, which became law on August 2, 1858. For this study, the most useful primary sources are Parliamentary Debates. Journals of the House of Commons and Lords, British and Foreign State' Papers, English Historical Queen Victoria's Letters , and the Annual' Re'g'i'st'er. Of the few secondary works which focus on British reac- tion to the Sepoy Mutiny, Anthony Wood's Nineteenth Centirr/ Britain, 1815-1914 gives a good account of British politics after the Mutiny. -
CITY of SAN JOSE, CALIFORNIA Office of the Ci~, Clerk 200 East Santa Clara Street San Jos~, California 95113 Telephone (408) 535-1260 FAX (408) 292-6207 City Clerk
CITY OF SAN JOSE, CALIFORNIA Office of the Ci~, Clerk 200 East Santa Clara Street San Jos~, California 95113 Telephone (408) 535-1260 FAX (408) 292-6207 City Clerk STATE OF CALIFORNIA) COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA) CITY OF SAN JOSE) I, Dennis Hawkins, City Clerk & Ex-Officio Clerk of the Council of and for the City of San Jose, in said County of Santa Clara, and State of California, do hereby certify that "Ordinance No. 29153", the original copy of which is attached hereto, was passed for publication of title on the 25th day of September, 2012, was published in accordance with the provisions of the Charter of the City of San Jose, and was given final reading and adopted on the 16th day of October, 2012, by the following vote: AYES: CAMPOS, CHU, CONSTANT, HERRERA, KALRA, LlCCARDO, NGUYEN, OLIVERIO, PYLE, ROCHA; REED. NOES: NONE. ABSENT: NONE. DISQUALIFIED: NONE. VACANT: NONE. Said ordinance is effective as of 16th day of November, 2012. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the corporate seal of the City of San Jose, this 17th day of October, 2012. (SEAL). DENNIS HAWKINS, CMC CITY CLERK & EX-OFFICIO CLERK OF THE CITY COUNCIL /rmk RD:RG ORD. NO. 29153 9/25/2012 ORDINANCE NO. 29153 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CiTY OF SAN JOSE AMENDING TITLE 23 OF THE SAN JOSE MUNICIPAL CODE BY AMENDING SECTIONS 23.02.290, 23.02.940, AND 23.02.1110, AND ADDING A NEW SECTION 23.02.493, TO CHAPTER 23.02, AMENDING SECTIONS 23.04.020 AND 23.04.120 OF CHAPTER 23.04, ALL TO AMEND SIGNAGE REGULATIONS PERTAINING TO SERVICE STATION CANOPY SIGNAGE, AMENDING -
Cabinet Secretary for Culture and External Affairs.Dot
Rt Hon Michael Gove MP Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster Cabinet Office 70 Whitehall London SW1A 2AS __ 17 June 2020 Dear Michael In our joint statement of 14 June, which expressed disappointment in your decision not to request an extension to transition before we had an opportunity to discuss this crucial matter ahead of the high level political stocktake, we said that we would write to you on the subject of ‘rebooting’ the process of engagement between the UK and Devolved Governments on the EU-UK negotiations. This letter sets out our thinking on this important subject. We have, in the meantime, received your letter of 14 June responding to our statement. As you acknowledged, we have different views on the way forward and our governments are not going to agree on the core fundamental positions with regard to the EU-UK future relationship. To our mind, this is all the more reason for us to re-double our efforts to work together for the benefit of business and communities in all parts of the United Kingdom, particularly as the option of an extension will no longer be open to the UK after the end of this month. It was because of the immutability of that deadline within the Withdrawal Agreement that we were so disappointed that the final decision was taken in advance of the meeting. While we have had the opportunity to register our views on this issue on several occasions, we would point out the difference between the quantity of meetings and other contacts between our administrations, and the quality of the engagement. -
Cabinet Room Scope and Content Notes
WHITE HOUSE TAPES CABINET ROOM CONVERSATIONS Nixon Presidential Materials Staff National Archives and Records Administration Linda Fischer Mark Fischer Ronald Sodano February 2002 NIXON WHITE HOUSE TAPES CABINET ROOM TAPES On October 16, 1997, the Nixon Presidential Materials staff opened eighty-three Nixon White House tapes containing conversations which took place within the Cabinet Room from February 16, 1971 through July 18, 1973. This release consisted of approximately 436 conversations and totaled approximately 154 hours. The Cabinet Room was one of seven locations in which conversations were surreptitiously taped. The complete Cabinet Room conversations are available to the public on reference cassettes C1 – C251 During review of the Cabinet Room tapes, approximately 78 hours of conversations were withdrawn under the provisions of the Presidential Recordings and Materials Preservation Act of 1974 (PRMPA) (44 USC 2111 note) and Executive Order (EO) 12356. These segments were re-reviewed under EO 12958 (April 17, 1995). As a result, the Nixon Presidential Materials Staff was able to open approximately 69 hours of previously restricted audio segments. The declassified segments were released on February 28, 2002, and are available as excerpted conversation segments on reference cassettes E504 – E633. These recorded White House tapes are part of the Presidential historical materials of the Nixon Administration. These materials are in the custody of the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) under the provisions of the PRMPA. Access to the Nixon Presidential materials is governed by the PRMPA and its implementing public access regulations. A Brief History of the White House Taping System In February 1971, the United State Secret Service (USSS), at the request of the President, installed listening devices in the White House. -
Cabinet Office – Annual Report and Accounts 2020-21
Annual Report and Accounts 2020-21 HC 391 Annual Report and Accounts 2020-21 (for period ended 31 March 2021) Accounts presented to the House of Commons pursuant to Section 6 (4) of the government Resources and Accounts Act 2000 Annual Report presented to the House of Commons by Command of Her Majesty Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed on 15 July 2021 HC 391 This is part of a series of departmental publications which, along with the Main Estimates 2021-22 and the document Public Expenditure: Statistical Analyses 2019, present the government’s outturn for 2020-21 and planned expenditure for 2021-22. © Crown copyright 2021 This publication is licensed under the terms of the Open Government Licence v3.0 except where otherwise stated. To view this licence, visit nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-Government-licence/version/3 Where we have identified any third-party copyright information you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. This publication is available at: www.gov.uk/official-documents Any enquiries regarding this publication should be sent to us at: [email protected] ISBN – 978-1-5286-2550-0 CCS – CCS0421468362 07/21 Printed on paper containing 75% recycled fibre content minimum. Printed in the UK by the APS Group on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office. Contents Directors’ Report 7 Foreword 8 Ministers and Board Members 10 Permanent Secretary’s perspective on performance 14 Cabinet Office Lead Non-Executive’s Report 17 Performance Report 19 Cabinet Office Overview 20 Long Term Expenditure Trends 24 Supporting the Government response to COVID-19 27 Strategic Objectives 32 Governance Report 55 Statement of Accounting Officer’s responsibilities 56 Governance Statement 58 Accountability Report 75 Remuneration and staff report 76 1.