DOCSLIB.ORG

Mars Balloon Drone

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Mars Balloon Drone Planetary Balloon Missions Revisited Planetary Balloon Missions Revisited John Vistica November 2016 Introduction: NASA introduced the concept of sending a superpressure balloon to Mars over a decade ago. I’ve always liked the idea of exploring Mars with up close images of ever-changing landscapes and had hoped that we would see this happen. NASA and JPL have also proposed a number of other balloon missions to Venus and elsewhere; however, it seems that nothing has gone beyond the proposal and fundamental testing stages and the latest papers on the subject are years old. Planetary Balloon Missions Revisited What’s New: A standard superpressure balloon has no means of changing its altitude, but there has been a fundamental advancement in superpressure balloons in the last few years allowing for a low tech means of variable altitude control. I am referring to GoogleX’s Project Loon to bring internet access to far off places here on Earth. Along with their ingenious means for altitude control they have also made significant advancements in producing consistent flawless polyethylene superpressure balloons able to maintain altitude up to six months without loss of helium. • How can we re-imagine previous mission proposals for superpressure balloons on Mars and Venus by applying this new method of variable altitude control? • How can variable altitude control expand the mission capabilities for planetary exploration? Personal Note: I am a space enthusiast and a recent Aerobot fan. I don’t know anyone at Google, NASA, JPL, SpaceX, or any other organization mentioned in this presentation. Planetary Balloon Missions Revisited Recent Mars and Venus Balloon Mission Proposals Here are three missions that will be covered in this presentation: Mars Aerobot / Balloon: This was a 2001 mission proposal for a 10,500 m3 superpressure balloon with a float altitude of 6.5 km and a payload of 15 kg and a diameter of 27 m. It would be able to traverse the majority of Mars landscapes at that altitude. For reference, since altitude is measured by the average elevation at Mars’ equator and Curiosity’s Gale Crater landing site is at -4.4 km, it would fly 10.9 km above Gale Crater. Mars Aerobot - Image credit: NASA/JPL VALOR: Part of the Venus Design Reference Mission (VDRM). Two superpressure balloons designed for a fixed altitude of 55.5 km where Earth-like temperature and pressure conditions exist. This is in the mid-level cloud layers of Venus where clouds range from 40 km to 60+ km. Mission duration: 30 days (battery dependent). Scientific Payload 22.5 kg. Diameter 7.1 m. Additional references: VEXAG: Venus Exploration Analysis Group Venus VALOR - Image credit: NASA/JPL VEXAG: Roadmap for Venus Exploration (2014) VME: Venus Mobile Explorer: A surface lander probe that, after first analyzing an initial landing site, expands a stainless steel bellows with helium causing the probe to float to second site for additional analysis. Mission duration: 1 hour descent and 5 hours after landing. Lander 650 kg + Bellows System 1132 kg. Venus VME - Image credit: NASA/JPL Planetary Balloon Missions Revisited GoogleX’s Project Loon Background: I highly recommend watching the set of 2013 GoogleX Project Loon YouTube videos for a very good overview of their balloon development and altitude control system. Variable Altitude Control: Basically GoogleX partnered with Raven Aerostar to develop and successfully demonstrate Image Credit: Google Loon Balloon (15m x 12m) altitude and flight path control utilizing an inner bladder envelope within the main fixed-volume superpressure envelope. Filling the bladder with outside air increases overall density of the balloon causing it to lower its altitude. By changing altitude it can catch different directional winds and thus steer itself using known weather patterns. This method completely avoids the classic and limiting ballast and venting methods for altitude control. Their balloons can maintain altitude for as long as six Image Credit: Google Loon Altitude Adjustments months before being remotely brought down for recovery. Patents: Google has patents for both the bladder buoyancy control method and an alternate method using a diaphragm connected at the circumference of the balloon. For a Loon balloon the bladder method is used, but for more extreme altitude control to dive to the surface of Mars or Venus the diaphragm method would use much less material so that is what Image Credit: Google Image Credit: Google Patent is assumed in this study. Patent for Bladder Method for Diaphragm Method Planetary Balloon Missions Revisited Buoyancy Fundamentals For A Loon-Based Balloon Buoyancy Equation: For simple balloons, lift mass for neutral buoyancy is based on the density of the air minus the density of the internal gas (helium) times the volume of the balloon (V0). For a more complex diaphragm balloon (Figure 1) this becomes: Lift mass = (Density_Air0 * V0) – (Density_He * V1) – (Density_Air2 * V2) Design Lift Mass: (See Appendix B for full equations) 1. Select a target max altitude for the balloon and determine the air density conditions using available atmospheric profile equations or data. 2. Select a V0 volume. 3. Calculate design lift (kg) for V0. This is when V2 = 0 and V1 = V0. This is the total mass of the balloon + payload for neutral buoyancy at the maximum altitude. 4. Select a design ΔP1 at max altitude. This is the differential pressure between P1 and P0 and dictates the initial helium load. It should be sufficiently high to ensure that the balloon does not depressurize under any ambient conditions expected in the operating altitudes. Ideally it should be well below the design limit of the balloon ΔPmax to facilitate altitude changing operations without adding excessive stress. Altitude Control System: 1. Pump in external air into V2 volume thus compressing V1. As V2 increases the Figure 1: Superpressure balloon with diaphragm overall weight of the balloon increases and the balloon will drop until the outside • P1 = P2 density balances the equation again. • ΔP1 = P1 – P0 2. Lowest altitude is only restricted by external conditions such as temperature and • V0 = V1 + V2 pressure that the balloon and payload material can handle (e.g. Venus). • T0 = T1 = T2 * 3. Using target altitude’s ambient values calculate V1, V2, and P1. Adjust V2 to the * This ignores heat transfer rates. In reality desired volume. there would be sensors monitoring internal 4. The differential pressure (ΔP1 = P1-P0) cannot exceed the maximum operating internal and external conditions to drive real-time pressure differential limit (ΔPmax). Increase V2 until ΔP1 = ΔPmax. Let the balloon drop responses with known heat transfer info. in altitude so that P0 increases. Increase V2 again in this controlled fashion until V2 equals the target value. Once conditions (T1, P1,V1,V2) settle out the balloon should be at target altitude. Planetary Balloon Missions Revisited Mars Balloon Mission Planetary Balloon Missions Revisited Mars Red Loon Mars Aerobot / Balloon: This was a 2001 mission proposal for a 10,500 m3 superpressure balloon with a fixed float altitude of 6.5 km and a payload of 15 kg and a diameter of 27 m. It would be able to traverse the majority of Mars landscapes at that altitude. For reference, since altitude is measured by the average elevation at Mars’ equator and Curiosity’s Gale Crater landing site is at -4.4 km, the balloon elevation would be 10.9 km above Gale Crater. Introducing the Mars Red Loon: Mars Aerobot - Image credit: NASA/JPL and Global Aerospace (‘Red Loon’ is just what I am calling a Mars version of a diaphragm-controlled balloon in this presentation.) • Take GoogleX’s off-the-shelf Loon balloon, and adapt it for Mars (diaphragm rather than bladder). • Select the design maximum altitude. • Upsize as necessary for larger payloads. For Earth at 27 km altitude, the standard operating altitude for a Loon, the conditions are already very close to those of Mars. GoogleX and Raven Aerostar have engineered a superpressure balloon for commercial purposes that is ideal for the next stage of exploring Mars. Planetary Balloon Missions Revisited Mars Red Loon – Mission Capabilities • Able to navigate over most the planet (Mars Elevation Map). Pretty much everything in the northern hemisphere is in reach. Limited only by the design altitude (maximum attainable altitude when V2 = 0). A set of design altitudes from 4.0 km to 6.5 km are examined in the presentation. • Steerable navigation utilizing wind directions at varying altitudes. Won’t be quite as accurate without Earth’s weather satellite info, but that is part of the adventure. • Able to land anywhere it can fly. The balloon can land and park itself as long as we want as many times as we want. By continuing to increase V2 after landing, the gondola becomes an anchor. Vent off V2 and the balloon is airborne again. • Characterize atmospheric conditions at varying altitudes (gas analysis, temperature, pressure, wind direction, wind speed, etc.). Greatly expand our understanding of the Martian atmosphere. • Provide ever-changing panoramic images and data on a daily basis. Provide up close validation of what we are seeing in the satellite imaging. • Able to travel over the landscape at whatever altitude we choose up to the design altitude…with appropriate aerobot safeguards to avoid approaching hazards. Want to cruise at 1 km and then drop into that approaching canyon at 100 m for a closer look?...no problem! • Presently we are limited to one landing site per mission with years in between. So far they are limited to low altitude ‘safe’ places to optimize the chance of a successful landing. I suspect that there are a lot of interesting places to explore on Mars that don’t make the list. A Red Loon would be able to drop in on dozens if not hundreds of diverse places.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Mars, the Nearest Habitable World – a Comprehensive Program for Future Mars Exploration
    Mars, the Nearest Habitable World – A Comprehensive Program for Future Mars Exploration Report by the NASA Mars Architecture Strategy Working Group (MASWG) November 2020 Front Cover: Artist Concepts Top (Artist concepts, left to right): Early Mars1; Molecules in Space2; Astronaut and Rover on Mars1; Exo-Planet System1. Bottom: Pillinger Point, Endeavour Crater, as imaged by the Opportunity rover1. Credits: 1NASA; 2Discovery Magazine Citation: Mars Architecture Strategy Working Group (MASWG), Jakosky, B. M., et al. (2020). Mars, the Nearest Habitable World—A Comprehensive Program for Future Mars Exploration. MASWG Members • Bruce Jakosky, University of Colorado (chair) • Richard Zurek, Mars Program Office, JPL (co-chair) • Shane Byrne, University of Arizona • Wendy Calvin, University of Nevada, Reno • Shannon Curry, University of California, Berkeley • Bethany Ehlmann, California Institute of Technology • Jennifer Eigenbrode, NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center • Tori Hoehler, NASA/Ames Research Center • Briony Horgan, Purdue University • Scott Hubbard, Stanford University • Tom McCollom, University of Colorado • John Mustard, Brown University • Nathaniel Putzig, Planetary Science Institute • Michelle Rucker, NASA/JSC • Michael Wolff, Space Science Institute • Robin Wordsworth, Harvard University Ex Officio • Michael Meyer, NASA Headquarters ii Mars, the Nearest Habitable World October 2020 MASWG Table of Contents Mars, the Nearest Habitable World – A Comprehensive Program for Future Mars Exploration Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Why NASA Consistently Fails at Congress
    W&M ScholarWorks Undergraduate Honors Theses Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects 6-2013 The Wrong Right Stuff: Why NASA Consistently Fails at Congress Andrew Follett College of William and Mary Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/honorstheses Part of the Political Science Commons Recommended Citation Follett, Andrew, "The Wrong Right Stuff: Why NASA Consistently Fails at Congress" (2013). Undergraduate Honors Theses. Paper 584. https://scholarworks.wm.edu/honorstheses/584 This Honors Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects at W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Undergraduate Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Wrong Right Stuff: Why NASA Consistently Fails at Congress A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree of Bachelors of Arts in Government from The College of William and Mary by Andrew Follett Accepted for . John Gilmour, Director . Sophia Hart . Rowan Lockwood Williamsburg, VA May 3, 2013 1 Table of Contents: Acknowledgements 3 Part 1: Introduction and Background 4 Pre Soviet Collapse: Early American Failures in Space 13 Pre Soviet Collapse: The Successful Mercury, Gemini, and Apollo Programs 17 Pre Soviet Collapse: The Quasi-Successful Shuttle Program 22 Part 2: The Thin Years, Repeated Failure in NASA in the Post-Soviet Era 27 The Failure of the Space Exploration Initiative 28 The Failed Vision for Space Exploration 30 The Success of Unmanned Space Flight 32 Part 3: Why NASA Fails 37 Part 4: Putting this to the Test 87 Part 5: Changing the Method.
    [Show full text]
  • 2. Going to Mars
    aMARTE A MARS ROADMAP FOR TRAVEL AND EXPLORATION Final Report International Space University Space Studies Program 2016 © International Space University. All Rights Reserved. The 2016 Space Studies Program of the International Space University (ISU) was hosted by the Technion – Israel Institute of Technology in Haifa, Israel. aMARTE has been selected as the name representing the Mars Team Project. This choice was motivated by the dual meaning the term conveys. aMARTE first stands for A Mars Roadmap for Travel and Exploration, the official label the team has adopted for the project. Alternatively, aMARTE can be interpreted from its Spanish roots "amarte," meaning "to love," or can also be viewed as "a Marte," meaning "going to Mars." This play on words represents the mission and spirit of the team, which is to put together a roadmap including various disciplines for a human mission to Mars and demonstrate a profound commitment to Mars exploration. The aMARTE title logo was developed based on sections of the astrological symbols for Earth and Mars. The blue symbol under the team's name represents Earth, and the orange arrow symbol is reminiscent of the characteristic color of Mars. The arrow also serves as an invitation to go beyond the Earth and explore our neighboring planet. Electronic copies of the Final Report and the Executive Summary can be downloaded from the ISU Library website at http://isulibrary.isunet.edu/ International Space University Strasbourg Central Campus Parc d’Innovation 1 rue Jean-Dominique Cassini 67400 Illkirch-Graffenstaden France Tel +33 (0)3 88 65 54 30 Fax +33 (0)3 88 65 54 47 e-mail: [email protected] website: www.isunet.edu I.
    [Show full text]
  • Mars Sample Return Using Commercial Capabilities: Mission Architecture Overview
    IEEE Aerospace Conference Yellowstone Conference Center in Big Sky Montana Session: 2.06 Future Missions & Enabling Technologies for In Situ Exploration, Sample Returns Sat 3/1/2014 Sat 3/8/2014 http://www.aeroconf.org/ Authors: Andrew A. Gonzales, NASA Ames Research Center Lawrence G. Lemke, NASA Ames Research Center Carol R. Stoker , NASA Ames Research Center Nicolas T. Faber, Stinger Ghaffarian Technologies Margaret S. Race, SETI Institute Mars Sample Return Using Commercial Capabilities: Mission Architecture Overview Mars Sample Return (MSR) is the highest priority science mission for the next decade as recommended by the recent Decadal Survey of Planetary Science. This paper presents an overview of a feasibility study for an MSR mission. The objective of the study was to determine whether emerging commercial capabilities can be used to reduce the number of mission systems and launches required to return the samples, with the goal of reducing mission cost. We report the feasibility of a complete and closed MSR mission design using the following scenario that covers three synodic launch opportunities, beginning with the 2022 opportunity: A Falcon Heavy injects a SpaceX Red Dragon capsule and trunk onto a Trans Mars Injection (TMI) trajectory. The capsule is modified to carry all the hardware needed to return samples collected on Mars including a Mars Ascent Vehicle (MAV), an Earth Return Vehicle (ERV), and hardware to transfer a sample collected in a previously landed rover mission to the ERV. The Red Dragon descends to land on the surface of Mars using Super Sonic Retro Propulsion (SSRP). After previously collected samples are transferred to the ERV, the single-stage MAV launches the ERV from the surface of Mars.
    [Show full text]
  • Space News Update – May 2019
    Space News Update – May 2019 By Pat Williams IN THIS EDITION: • India aims to be 1st country to land rover on Moon's south pole. • Jeff Bezos says Blue Origin will land humans on moon by 2024. • China's Chang'e-4 probe resumes work for sixth lunar day. • NASA awards Artemis contract for lunar gateway power. • From airport to spaceport as UK targets horizontal spaceflight. • Russian space sector plagued by astronomical corruption. • Links to other space and astronomy news published in May 2019. Disclaimer - I claim no authorship for the printed material; except where noted (PW). INDIA AIMS TO BE 1ST COUNTRY TO LAND ROVER ON MOON'S SOUTH POLE India will become the first country to land a rover on the Moon's the south pole if the country's space agency "Indian Space Research Organisation (ISRO)" successfully achieves the feat during the country's second Moon mission "Chandrayaan-2" later this year. "This is a place where nobody has gone. All the ISRO missions till now to the Moon have landed near the Moon's equator. Chandrayaan-2, India’s second lunar mission, has three modules namely Orbiter, Lander (Vikram) & Rover (Pragyan). The Orbiter and Lander modules will be interfaced mechanically and stacked together as an integrated module and accommodated inside the GSLV MK-III launch vehicle. The Rover is housed inside the Lander. After launch into earth bound orbit by GSLV MK-III, the integrated module will reach Moon orbit using Orbiter propulsion module. Subsequently, Lander will separate from the Orbiter and soft land at the predetermined site close to lunar South Pole.
    [Show full text]
  • Espinsights the Global Space Activity Monitor
    ESPInsights The Global Space Activity Monitor Issue 1 January–April 2019 CONTENTS SPACE POLICY AND PROGRAMMES .................................................................................... 1 Focus .................................................................................................................... 1 Europe ................................................................................................................... 4 11TH European Space Policy Conference ......................................................................... 4 EU programmatic roadmap: towards a comprehensive Regulation of the European Space Programme 4 EDA GOVSATCOM GSC demo project ............................................................................. 5 Programme Advancements: Copernicus, Galileo, ExoMars ................................................... 5 European Space Agency: partnerships continue to flourish................................................... 6 Renewed support for European space SMEs and training ..................................................... 7 UK Space Agency leverages COMPASS project for international cooperation .............................. 7 France multiplies international cooperation .................................................................... 7 Italy’s PRISMA pride ................................................................................................ 8 Establishment of the Portuguese Space Agency: Data is King ................................................ 8 Belgium and Luxembourg
    [Show full text]
  • 2015 October
    TTSIQ #13 page 1 OCTOBER 2015 www.nasa.gov/press-release/nasa-confirms-evidence-that-liquid-water-flows-on-today-s-mars Flash! Sept. 28, 2015: www.space.com/30674-flowing-water-on-mars-discovery-pictures.html www.space.com/30673-water-flows-on-mars-discovery.html - “boosting odds for life!” These dark, narrow, 100 meter~yards long streaks called “recurring slope lineae” flowing downhill on Mars are inferred to have been formed by contemporary flowing water www.space.com/30683-mars-liquid-water-astronaut-exploration.html INDEX 2 Co-sponsoring Organizations NEWS SECTION pp. 3-56 3-13 Earth Orbit and Mission to Planet Earth 13-14 Space Tourism 15-20 Cislunar Space and the Moon 20-28 Mars 29-33 Asteroids & Comets 34-47 Other Planets & their moons 48-56 Starbound ARTICLES & ESSAY SECTION pp 56-84 56 Replace "Pluto the Dwarf Planet" with "Pluto-Charon Binary Planet" 61 Kepler Shipyards: an Innovative force that could reshape the future 64 Moon Fans + Mars Fans => Collaboration on Joint Project Areas 65 Editor’s List of Needed Science Missions 66 Skyfields 68 Alan Bean: from “Moonwalker” to Artist 69 Economic Assessment and Systems Analysis of an Evolvable Lunar Architecture that Leverages Commercial Space Capabilities and Public-Private-Partnerships 71 An Evolved Commercialized International Space Station 74 Remembrance of Dr. APJ Abdul Kalam 75 The Problem of Rational Investment of Capital in Sustainable Futures on Earth and in Space 75 Recommendations to Overcome Non-Technical Challenges to Cleaning Up Orbital Debris STUDENTS & TEACHERS pp 85-96 Past TTSIQ issues are online at: www.moonsociety.org/international/ttsiq/ and at: www.nss.org/tothestarsOO TTSIQ #13 page 2 OCTOBER 2015 TTSIQ Sponsor Organizations 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Robotics and Automation for “Icebreaker” B.J
    ROBOTICS AND AUTOMATION FOR “ICEBREAKER” B.J. Glass (1), G. Paulsen(2), A. Dave (1), C. McKay(1) (1) NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA 94035 USA; Email: [email protected] (2) Honeybee Robotics, Pasadena, CA 91103 USA; Email: [email protected] ABSTRACT components that will penetrate below the ground, and place these inside a biobarrier. To prevent The proposed “Icebreaker” mission is a return to spores from traveling onto the drill auger/bit via the Mars polar latitudes first visited by the Phoenix sample transfer, there must be an air gap between mission in 2007-08. Exploring and interrogating the sterilized drill and a less-sterilized robotic the shallow subsurface of Mars from the surface sample delivery subsystem that could contact the will require some form of excavation and “dirty” spacecraft instruments (which will not be penetration, with drilling being the most mature heat sterilized to Viking standards). approach. A series of 0.5-5m automated rotary and rotary-percussive drills developed over the past Since 2006, NASA has developed a Discovery- decade by NASA Ames and Honeybee Robotics class mission concept, called "Icebreaker" (Fig. 1), provide a capability that could fly on a Mars which is a Lockheed-Martin (Phoenix-derived) surface mission within the next decade. Surface Mars polar lander with life and organics detection robotics have been integrated for sample transfer to instruments and a 1m sampling drill [4]. The deck instruments, and the Icebreaker sample Icebreaker science payload has since 2010 also acquisition system has been tested successfully in been the baseline science payload for developing a Mars chambers and analog field sites to depths joint NASA-commercial Mars astrobiology between 1-3m.
    [Show full text]
  • Espinsights the Global Space Activity Monitor
    ESPInsights The Global Space Activity Monitor Issue 6 April-June 2020 CONTENTS FOCUS ..................................................................................................................... 6 The Crew Dragon mission to the ISS and the Commercial Crew Program ..................................... 6 SPACE POLICY AND PROGRAMMES .................................................................................... 7 EUROPE ................................................................................................................. 7 COVID-19 and the European space sector ....................................................................... 7 Space technologies for European defence ...................................................................... 7 ESA Earth Observation Missions ................................................................................... 8 Thales Alenia Space among HLS competitors ................................................................... 8 Advancements for the European Service Module ............................................................... 9 Airbus for the Martian Sample Fetch Rover ..................................................................... 9 New appointments in ESA, GSA and Eurospace ................................................................ 10 Italy introduces Platino, regions launch Mirror Copernicus .................................................. 10 DLR new research observatory ..................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Summary of the Presentations, Discussion, and Main Outcomes of the 33Rd MEPAG Meeting February 22-23, 2017 @ Monrovia, CA
    Summary of the presentations, discussion, and main outcomes of the 33rd MEPAG meeting February 22-23, 2017 @ Monrovia, CA Posted agenda and presentation files: http://mepag.nasa.gov/meetings.cfm?expand=m33 This summary presents an overview of discussion at the meeting as well as presentation materials. Completed March 16, 2017 and posted to https://mepag.jpl.nasa.gov/meeting/2017- 03/Summary_MEPAG33_v5.pdf. Key MEPAG Announcements • Please send any feedback via the email [email protected]. • We welcome Don Banfield as the new Goals Committee Chair. o We thank Vicky Hamilton for her effort as the Goals Committee Chair that resulted in the 2012 and 2015 Goals Document revisions. o The full Goals Committee membership is listed at https://mepag.jpl.nasa.gov/about.cfm. o A first task will be to examine the key Mars Polar Science questions resulting from the recent Mars Polar Science conference, as presented by Isaac Smith at the meeting. • The Mars International Collaboration Science Analyis Group (MIC-SAG) report was completed and presented to the MEPAG community by Chair Bruce Jakosky. • We discussed possibly having the next MEPAG “face to face” meeting during the week of July 10, 2017. Such a meeting would be finalized once NASA receives additional information regarding future planning that can be disseminated and discussed with the community. More information on this is expected by late March. • A proposal was presented for quarterly MEPAG events, with at least one and possibly two meetings to be face-to-face and others to be conducted as virtual events. This suggestion was generally supported and plans for a first virtual panel will be explored in the near future.
    [Show full text]
  • AEROSPACE Magazine App, for an Online Account and Pay Your Subscription Expanded Our E-Library Resources and Launched a Straight Away
    AE December 2020 ROSPACE SMART AIRLINER CABINS UK INTEGRATED REVIEW: ALREADY DEAD? CHANGING BUSINESS AVIATION’S IMAGE www.aerosociety.com December 2020 MARS ATTRACTS V olume 47 Number 12 RED PLANET GETS SET FOR NEW ROBOT VISITORS Royal A eronautical Society 11–15 & 19–21 JANUARY 2021 | ONLINE AN E X P A N DEXPERIENCE E D The world’s largest event for aerospace research and development just got bigger! The virtual 2021 AIAA SciTech Forum has expanded into eight days of programming over a two-week time frame. The new format offers a convenient, condensed daily schedule, allowing you to balance your work load and home life while attending a virtual event. Each day will be anchored by a high-level keynote or lecture, with 2,500+ technical presentations, panels, and special sessions scheduled throughout the forum. The forum will explore the functional role and importance of diversity in advancing the aerospace industry. Hear from high-profile industry leaders as they provide perspectives on how diversification of teams, industry sectors, technologies, and design cycles can all be leveraged toward innovation. REGISTER NOW aiaa.org/2021SciTech Volume 47 Number 12 December 2020 EDITORIAL Contents Lost Moon? Regulars 4 Radome 12 Transmission After a week of nail-biting excitement, last month saw a new president The latest aviation and Your letters, emails, tweets aeronautical intelligence, and social media feedback. elected in the US, Joe Biden. Although he is yet to be formally elected by analysis and comment. the Electoral College and inaugurated in January, it is extremely unlikely that 58 The Last Word this will be overturned.
    [Show full text]
  • The Deep Space Network Committee on the Review of Progress Toward Implementing the Decadal Survey Vision & Voyages for Planetary Sciences Joseph Lazio L
    The Deep Space Network Committee on the Review of Progress toward Implementing the Decadal Survey Vision & Voyages for Planetary Sciences Joseph Lazio L. Benner, A. Bhanji, A. Biswas, W. Klipstein, S. Lichten, J. Statman, S. Townes © 2017 California Institute of Technology. Government sponsorship acknowledged. Deep Space Network Topics - Deep Space communications and navigation - Planetary radar - Future planning Canberra Goldstone Madrid2 Planetary Sciences-DSN Partnership Don’t Leave Earth Without Us! Voyager 1 Voyager 2 Dawn Cassini New Horizons Geotail Mars Odyssey Curiosity Opportunity MOM Mars Reconnaissance Mars TGO ARTEMIS OSIRIS REx XMM Cluster JUNO Akatsuki MAVEN Mars Express Orbiter Chandra MMS STEREO Wind DSCOVR Spitzer SOHO Kepler Hayabusa-2 ACE LRO Solar Probe Plus TESS JWST BepiColumbo InSight Mars 2020 Europa GSSR Planetary Sciences Vision 2050 3 Telemetry, Tracking, & Command: 5 Year Monthly Data, Averaged over All Missions DSN Network Data Delivery (Fiscal) 100%100.0% 99.5% 99%99.0% 98.5% 98.0% 97.5% • Telemetry • Command 97%97.0% NASA requirement: 95% • RadioMetric Typical DSN performance > 99% • Combined 96.5% 96.0% 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2011-05 2011-11 2012-05 2012-07 2013-01 2013-07 2014-01 2014-03 2014-09 2015-03 2015-09 2015-11 2016-05 2016-11 2017-05 2011-01 2011-03 2011-07 2011-09 2012-01 2012-03 2012-09 2012-11 2013-03 2013-05 2013-09 2013-11 2014-05 2014-07 2014-11 2015-01 2015-05 2015-07 2016-01 2016-03 2016-07 2016-09 2017-01 2017-03 Network Telemetry % Network Command % Network RadioMetric % Combined % Poly.
    [Show full text]