DOCSLIB.ORG

Sarahsaurus Aurifontanalis from the Early Jurassic Kayenta Formation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Sarahsaurus Aurifontanalis from the Early Jurassic Kayenta Formation RESEARCH ARTICLE Anatomy and systematics of the sauropodomorph Sarahsaurus aurifontanalis from the Early Jurassic Kayenta Formation 1,2 1 Adam D. MarshID *, Timothy B. Rowe 1 The Jackson School of Geosciences, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, United States of America, 2 Division of Science and Resource Management, Petrified Forest National Park, Arizona, United States of America * [email protected] a1111111111 a1111111111 a1111111111 Abstract a1111111111 a1111111111 Sarahsaurus aurifontanalis, from the Kayenta Formation of Arizona, is one of only three sauropodomorph dinosaurs known from the Early Jurassic of North America. It joins Anchi- saurus polyzelus, from the older Portland Formation of the Hartford Basin, and Seitaad reussi, from the younger Navajo Sandstone of Utah, in representing the oldest North Ameri- OPEN ACCESS can sauropodomorphs. If it is true that sauropodomorphs were absent from North America Citation: Marsh AD, Rowe TB (2018) Anatomy and during the Late Triassic, the relationship among these three dinosaurs offers a test of the systematics of the sauropodomorph Sarahsaurus mechanisms that drove recovery in North American biodiversity following the end-Triassic aurifontanalis from the Early Jurassic Kayenta extinction event. Here we provide the first thorough description of Sarahsaurus aurifontana- Formation. PLoS ONE 13(10): e0204007. https:// doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0204007 lis based on completed preparation and computed tomographic imaging of the holotype and referred specimens. With new anatomical data, our phylogenetic analysis supports the con- Editor: William Oki Wong, Indiana University Bloomington, UNITED STATES clusion that Sarahsaurus aurifontanalis is nested within the primarily Gondwanan clade Massospondylidae, while agreeing with previous analyses that the three North American Received: December 4, 2017 sauropodomorphs do not themselves form an exclusive clade. A revised diagnosis and Accepted: September 1, 2018 more thorough understanding of the anatomy of Sarahsaurus aurifontanalis support the Published: October 10, 2018 view that independent dispersal events were at least partly responsible for the recovery in Copyright: This is an open access article, free of all North American vertebrate diversity following a major extinction event. copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 public domain dedication. Data Availability Statement: Locality information Introduction and the fossils of TMM 43646-2 are available at the Univeristy of Texas Vertebrate Paleontology Lab in In the late 19th Century O. C. Marsh of the Yale Peabody Museum described the first remains Austin, TX (Accession number: A2000.43646). of North American early sauropodomorph dinosaurs, from the Early Jurassic Portland Forma- Linear measurements and phylogenetic character- tion of Massachusetts and Connecticut [1±6]. Several names were coined for these specimens, taxon matrices for all analyses in the paper are but most recent authors consider all this material to represent a single taxon, and most (but included as supplemental information. Digital videos of CT renderings and the CT data not all) recognize Anchisaurus (Ammosaurus) polyzelus as its valid name [7±10]. We follow themselves are available at The University of Texas this convention below. High-Resolution X-Ray Computed Tomography Several decades would pass before additional early sauropodomorph specimens were found Facility (www.ctlab.geo.utexas.edu). in North America, and nearly a century before informative new specimens were recovered. PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0204007 October 10, 2018 1 / 108 Anatomy and systematics of Sarahsaurus aurifontanalis Funding: This research was funded by the Jackson The next sauropodmorph to be described was a fragmentary postcranial skeleton collected by School of Geosciences and the National Science Lionel F. Brady of the Museum of Northern Arizona. It was found in northern Arizona in the Foundation (NSF EAR 1258878, EAR 1561622, EAR 1160721, EAR 0948842, and IIS-0531767) to uppermost formation of the Glen Canyon Group, the Early Jurassic Navajo Sandstone. Brady TBR. Andrew Milner and the St. George Dinosaur referred this material to Anchisaurus (Ammosaurus)[11, 12], believing this taxon to be a thero- Discovery Site at Johnson Farm funded Brian pod dinosaur. Galton [7, 13] later correctly interpreted Anchisaurus (Ammosaurus) as an early Engh's art of the Kayenta fauna. The funders had sauropodomorph, to which he referred Brady's material plus a second fragmentary specimen no role in study design, data collection and from the Navajo Sandstone of Arizona that was collected by Charles L. Camp for the Univer- analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the sity of California Museum of Paleontology. Yates [8] subsequently argued that the two Navajo manuscript. Sandstone specimens represented a single taxon and that it was distinct from Anchisaurus Competing interests: The authors have declared (Ammosaurus). He thought it was possibly related to Massospondylus carinatus [14] from that no competing interests exist. southern Africa, but he deemed the material too incomplete for a definitive referral. Abbreviations: BP, Evolutionary Studies Institute Between 1976 and 1978, a joint expedition from the Museum of Northern Arizona and (formerly the Bernard Price Institiute for Harvard's Museum of Comparative Zoology (MCZ) explored another part of the Glen Canyon Paleontological Research), Johannesburg, South Group in northern Arizona, the so-called `SiltyFacies' of the Early Jurassic Kayenta Formation, Africa; BSP, Bayerische Staatssammlung fuÈr PalaÈontologie und Historische Geologie, MuÈnchen, which underlies and interfingers with the Navajo Sandstone. They collected a single broken Germany; LV, Lufeng Dinosaur Museum, Jingshan, sauropodomorph skull and associated postcranial fragments from the base of a geographic fea- Yunnan Province, China; MCP, Museu de Ciêncian ture known as `RockHead.' Owing to the questionable taxonomic identity (below), we infor- e Tecnologia PUCS, Porto Alegre, Brazil; MCZ, maly designate this as the `RockHead specimen.' The specimen was reposited in the MCZ Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard (MCZ 8893). University, Cambridge, Massachusetts; SMNS, Staatliches Museum fuÈr Naturkunde, Stuttgart, In the initial description [15], the Rock Head specimen was referred to Massospondylus sp., Germany; TMM, Vertebrate Paleontology a well-known taxon represented by numerous relatively complete skeletons from multiple Laboratory, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, localities in southern Africa [14]. Its identification as Massospondylus sp. was taken as evidence Texas. further supporting the concept that a cosmopolitan dinosaur fauna of low taxonomic diversity occupied Pangaea in the Late Triassic and Early Jurassic [9, 10, 16±18]. Subsequent workers expressed doubts about its referral to Massospondylus sp., and it became known as `the unnamed Kayenta prosauropod' (e.g., [19] p. 27, [20]). Uncertainty about its identity also raised some of the first doubts to be cast over the prevailing view of cosmopolitan dinosaur faunas of low taxonomic diversity across Pangaea in the Late Triassic and Early Jurassic. In 2006, the sauropodomorph ªFendusaurus eldoniº from the Early Jurassic McCoy Brook Formation of Nova Scotia was named on a very poorly preserved specimen and given prelimi- nary description in an unpublished dissertation [21]. A formal description and diagnosis has yet to be published. In 2010, preliminary descriptions of two new early sauropodomorphs from the Glen Can- yon Group of the Colorado Plateau were published. The first was Seitaad ruessi, described by Sertich and Loewen [22] based on a single, partial skeleton lacking the skull. It was the third sauropodomorph specimen reported from the Navajo Sandstone; it was collected in southern Utah by the Utah Museum of Natural History [22, 23]. Seitaad ruessi was postulated to have affinities either to plateosaurid or to massospondylid sauropodomorphs, but its incomplete- ness left a measure of phylogenetic uncertainty that was compounded by more general uncer- tainty and poor phylogenetic resolution for this early history of the sauropodomorph lineage [24, 25]. The two specimens previously reported from the Navajo Sandstone were found to compare favorably to Seitaad ruessi, but they were considered too fragmentary for a confident referral [22]. Next to be described was Sarahsaurus aurifontanalis, based on two partial skeletons [25]. Both individuals were collected from a single quarry in the Silty Facies of the Kayenta Forma- tion during a collaborative survey by The University of Texas Vertebrate Paleontology Labora- tory and the Navajo Nation EcoScouts that took place between 1997±2000. In the initial diagnosis and description of Sarahsaurus aurifontanalis, the holotype was designated as the more mature and complete of the two skeletons and the only one that included parts of a PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0204007 October 10, 2018 2 / 108 Anatomy and systematics of Sarahsaurus aurifontanalis disarticuated skull; the less-mature and less-complete skeleton was designated the paratype [25]. In this initial description, the Rock Head skull was provisionally referred to Sarahsaurus aurifontanalis. Below, we present a more detailed description of the
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Princeton Field Guide to Dinosaurs, Second Edition
    MASS ESTIMATES - DINOSAURS ETC (largely based on models) taxon k model femur length* model volume ml x specific gravity = model mass g specimen (modeled 1st):kilograms:femur(or other long bone length)usually in decameters kg = femur(or other long bone)length(usually in decameters)3 x k k = model volume in ml x specific gravity(usually for whole model) then divided/model femur(or other long bone)length3 (in most models femur in decameters is 0.5253 = 0.145) In sauropods the neck is assigned a distinct specific gravity; in dinosaurs with large feathers their mass is added separately; in dinosaurs with flight ablity the mass of the fight muscles is calculated separately as a range of possiblities SAUROPODS k femur trunk neck tail total neck x 0.6 rest x0.9 & legs & head super titanosaur femur:~55000-60000:~25:00 Argentinosaurus ~4 PVPH-1:~55000:~24.00 Futalognkosaurus ~3.5-4 MUCPv-323:~25000:19.80 (note:downsize correction since 2nd edition) Dreadnoughtus ~3.8 “ ~520 ~75 50 ~645 0.45+.513=.558 MPM-PV 1156:~26000:19.10 Giraffatitan 3.45 .525 480 75 25 580 .045+.455=.500 HMN MB.R.2181:31500(neck 2800):~20.90 “XV2”:~45000:~23.50 Brachiosaurus ~4.15 " ~590 ~75 ~25 ~700 " +.554=~.600 FMNH P25107:~35000:20.30 Europasaurus ~3.2 “ ~465 ~39 ~23 ~527 .023+.440=~.463 composite:~760:~6.20 Camarasaurus 4.0 " 542 51 55 648 .041+.537=.578 CMNH 11393:14200(neck 1000):15.25 AMNH 5761:~23000:18.00 juv 3.5 " 486 40 55 581 .024+.487=.511 CMNH 11338:640:5.67 Chuanjiesaurus ~4.1 “ ~550 ~105 ~38 ~693 .063+.530=.593 Lfch 1001:~10700:13.75 2 M.
    [Show full text]
  • Download the Article
    A couple of partially-feathered creatures about the The Outside Story size of a turkey pop out of a stand of ferns. By the water you spot a flock of bigger animals, lean and predatory, catching fish. And then an even bigger pair of animals, each longer than a car, with ostentatious crests on their heads, stalk out of the heat haze. The fish-catchers dart aside, but the new pair have just come to drink. We can only speculate what a walk through Jurassic New England would be like, but the fossil record leaves many hints. According to Matthew Inabinett, one of the Beneski Museum of Natural History’s senior docents and a student of vertebrate paleontology, dinosaur footprints found in the sedimentary rock of the Connecticut Valley reveal much about these animals and their environment. At the time, the land that we know as New England was further south, close to where Cuba is now. A system of rift basins that cradled lakes ran right through our region, from North Carolina to Nova Scotia. As reliable sources of water, with plants for the herbivores and fish for the carnivores, the lakes would have been havens of life. While most of the fossil footprints found in New England so far are in the lower Connecticut Valley, Dinosaur Tracks they provide a window into a world that extended throughout the region. According to Inabinett, the By: Rachel Marie Sargent tracks generally fall into four groupings. He explained that these names are for the tracks, not Imagine taking a walk through a part of New the dinosaurs that made them, since, “it’s very England you’ve never seen—how it was 190 million difficult, if not impossible, to match a footprint to a years ago.
    [Show full text]
  • The Origin and Early Evolution of Dinosaurs
    Biol. Rev. (2010), 85, pp. 55–110. 55 doi:10.1111/j.1469-185X.2009.00094.x The origin and early evolution of dinosaurs Max C. Langer1∗,MartinD.Ezcurra2, Jonathas S. Bittencourt1 and Fernando E. Novas2,3 1Departamento de Biologia, FFCLRP, Universidade de S˜ao Paulo; Av. Bandeirantes 3900, Ribeir˜ao Preto-SP, Brazil 2Laboratorio de Anatomia Comparada y Evoluci´on de los Vertebrados, Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales ‘‘Bernardino Rivadavia’’, Avda. Angel Gallardo 470, Cdad. de Buenos Aires, Argentina 3CONICET (Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Cient´ıficas y T´ecnicas); Avda. Rivadavia 1917 - Cdad. de Buenos Aires, Argentina (Received 28 November 2008; revised 09 July 2009; accepted 14 July 2009) ABSTRACT The oldest unequivocal records of Dinosauria were unearthed from Late Triassic rocks (approximately 230 Ma) accumulated over extensional rift basins in southwestern Pangea. The better known of these are Herrerasaurus ischigualastensis, Pisanosaurus mertii, Eoraptor lunensis,andPanphagia protos from the Ischigualasto Formation, Argentina, and Staurikosaurus pricei and Saturnalia tupiniquim from the Santa Maria Formation, Brazil. No uncontroversial dinosaur body fossils are known from older strata, but the Middle Triassic origin of the lineage may be inferred from both the footprint record and its sister-group relation to Ladinian basal dinosauromorphs. These include the typical Marasuchus lilloensis, more basal forms such as Lagerpeton and Dromomeron, as well as silesaurids: a possibly monophyletic group composed of Mid-Late Triassic forms that may represent immediate sister taxa to dinosaurs. The first phylogenetic definition to fit the current understanding of Dinosauria as a node-based taxon solely composed of mutually exclusive Saurischia and Ornithischia was given as ‘‘all descendants of the most recent common ancestor of birds and Triceratops’’.
    [Show full text]
  • The Sauropodomorph Biostratigraphy of the Elliot Formation of Southern Africa: Tracking the Evolution of Sauropodomorpha Across the Triassic–Jurassic Boundary
    Editors' choice The sauropodomorph biostratigraphy of the Elliot Formation of southern Africa: Tracking the evolution of Sauropodomorpha across the Triassic–Jurassic boundary BLAIR W. MCPHEE, EMESE M. BORDY, LARA SCISCIO, and JONAH N. CHOINIERE McPhee, B.W., Bordy, E.M., Sciscio, L., and Choiniere, J.N. 2017. The sauropodomorph biostratigraphy of the Elliot Formation of southern Africa: Tracking the evolution of Sauropodomorpha across the Triassic–Jurassic boundary. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 62 (3): 441–465. The latest Triassic is notable for coinciding with the dramatic decline of many previously dominant groups, followed by the rapid radiation of Dinosauria in the Early Jurassic. Among the most common terrestrial vertebrates from this time, sauropodomorph dinosaurs provide an important insight into the changing dynamics of the biota across the Triassic–Jurassic boundary. The Elliot Formation of South Africa and Lesotho preserves the richest assemblage of sauropodomorphs known from this age, and is a key index assemblage for biostratigraphic correlations with other simi- larly-aged global terrestrial deposits. Past assessments of Elliot Formation biostratigraphy were hampered by an overly simplistic biozonation scheme which divided it into a lower “Euskelosaurus” Range Zone and an upper Massospondylus Range Zone. Here we revise the zonation of the Elliot Formation by: (i) synthesizing the last three decades’ worth of fossil discoveries, taxonomic revision, and lithostratigraphic investigation; and (ii) systematically reappraising the strati- graphic provenance of important fossil locations. We then use our revised stratigraphic information in conjunction with phylogenetic character data to assess morphological disparity between Late Triassic and Early Jurassic sauropodomorph taxa. Our results demonstrate that the Early Jurassic upper Elliot Formation is considerably more taxonomically and morphologically diverse than previously thought.
    [Show full text]
  • Massospondylus Carinatus Owen 1854 (Dinosauria: Sauropodomorpha) from the Lower Jurassic of South Africa: Proposed Conservation of Usage by Designation of a Neotype
    Massospondylus carinatus Owen 1854 (Dinosauria: Sauropodomorpha) from the Lower Jurassic of South Africa: Proposed conservation of usage by designation of a neotype Adam M. Yates1* & Paul M. Barrett2 1Bernard Price Institute for Palaeontological Research, University of the Witwatersrand, Private Bag 3, WITS, 2050 Johannesburg, South Africa 2Department of Palaeontology, The Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London, SW7 5BD, U.K. Received 17 February 2010. Accepted 12 November 2010 The purpose of this article is to preserve the usage of the binomen Massospondylus carinatus by designating a neotype specimen. Massospondylus is the most abundant basal sauropodomorph dinosaur from the Early Jurassic strata of southern Africa. This taxon forms the basis for an extensive palaeobiological literature and is the eponym of Massospondylidae and the nominal taxon of a biostratigraphical unit in current usage, the ‘Massospondylus Range Zone’. The syntype series of M. carinatus (five disarticulated and broken vertebrae) was destroyed during World War II, but plaster casts and illustrations of the material survive. Nonetheless, these materials cannot act as type material for this taxon under the rules of the ICZN Code. In order to avoid nomenclatural instability, we hereby designate BP/1/4934 (a skull and largely complete postcranial skeleton) as the neotype of Massospondylus carinatus. Keywords: Dinosauria, Sauropodomorpha, Massospondylidae, Massospondylus, Massospondylus carinatus, neotype, South Africa, upper Elliot Formation, Early Jurassic. INTRODUCTION same taxon, possibly even the same individual, as at least Richard Owen described and named Massospondylus some of the syntype series of Massospondylus carinatus. carinatus (1854, p. 97) with carinatus as the type species of Their initial separation from Massospondylus carinatus the genus by monotypy.
    [Show full text]
  • Dinosaurs British Isles
    DINOSAURS of the BRITISH ISLES Dean R. Lomax & Nobumichi Tamura Foreword by Dr Paul M. Barrett (Natural History Museum, London) Skeletal reconstructions by Scott Hartman, Jaime A. Headden & Gregory S. Paul Life and scene reconstructions by Nobumichi Tamura & James McKay CONTENTS Foreword by Dr Paul M. Barrett.............................................................................10 Foreword by the authors........................................................................................11 Acknowledgements................................................................................................12 Museum and institutional abbreviations...............................................................13 Introduction: An age-old interest..........................................................................16 What is a dinosaur?................................................................................................18 The question of birds and the ‘extinction’ of the dinosaurs..................................25 The age of dinosaurs..............................................................................................30 Taxonomy: The naming of species.......................................................................34 Dinosaur classification...........................................................................................37 Saurischian dinosaurs............................................................................................39 Theropoda............................................................................................................39
    [Show full text]
  • A Re-Evaluation of the Enigmatic Dinosauriform Caseosaurus Crosbyensis from the Late Triassic of Texas, USA and Its Implications for Early Dinosaur Evolution
    A re-evaluation of the enigmatic dinosauriform Caseosaurus crosbyensis from the Late Triassic of Texas, USA and its implications for early dinosaur evolution MATTHEW G. BARON and MEGAN E. WILLIAMS Baron, M.G. and Williams, M.E. 2018. A re-evaluation of the enigmatic dinosauriform Caseosaurus crosbyensis from the Late Triassic of Texas, USA and its implications for early dinosaur evolution. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 63 (1): 129–145. The holotype specimen of the Late Triassic dinosauriform Caseosaurus crosbyensis is redescribed and evaluated phylogenetically for the first time, providing new anatomical information and data on the earliest dinosaurs and their evolution within the dinosauromorph lineage. Historically, Caseosaurus crosbyensis has been considered to represent an early saurischian dinosaur, and often a herrerasaur. More recent work on Triassic dinosaurs has cast doubt over its supposed dinosaurian affinities and uncertainty about particular features in the holotype and only known specimen has led to the species being regarded as a dinosauriform of indeterminate position. Here, we present a new diagnosis for Caseosaurus crosbyensis and refer additional material to the taxon—a partial right ilium from Snyder Quarry. Our com- parisons and phylogenetic analyses suggest that Caseosaurus crosbyensis belongs in a clade with herrerasaurs and that this clade is the sister taxon of Dinosauria, rather than positioned within it. This result, along with other recent analyses of early dinosaurs, pulls apart what remains of the “traditional” group of dinosaurs collectively termed saurischians into a polyphyletic assemblage and implies that Dinosauria should be regarded as composed exclusively of Ornithoscelida (Ornithischia + Theropoda) and Sauropodomorpha. In addition, our analysis recovers the enigmatic European taxon Saltopus elginensis among herrerasaurs for the first time.
    [Show full text]
  • The Anatomy and Phylogenetic Relationships of Antetonitrus Ingenipes (Sauropodiformes, Dinosauria): Implications for the Origins of Sauropoda
    THE ANATOMY AND PHYLOGENETIC RELATIONSHIPS OF ANTETONITRUS INGENIPES (SAUROPODIFORMES, DINOSAURIA): IMPLICATIONS FOR THE ORIGINS OF SAUROPODA Blair McPhee A dissertation submitted to the Faculty of Science, University of the Witwatersrand, in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science. Johannesburg, 2013 i ii ABSTRACT A thorough description and cladistic analysis of the Antetonitrus ingenipes type material sheds further light on the stepwise acquisition of sauropodan traits just prior to the Triassic/Jurassic boundary. Although the forelimb of Antetonitrus and other closely related sauropododomorph taxa retains the plesiomorphic morphology typical of a mobile grasping structure, the changes in the weight-bearing dynamics of both the musculature and the architecture of the hindlimb document the progressive shift towards a sauropodan form of graviportal locomotion. Nonetheless, the presence of hypertrophied muscle attachment sites in Antetonitrus suggests the retention of an intermediary form of facultative bipedality. The term Sauropodiformes is adopted here and given a novel definition intended to capture those transitional sauropodomorph taxa occupying a contiguous position on the pectinate line towards Sauropoda. The early record of sauropod diversification and evolution is re- examined in light of the paraphyletic consensus that has emerged regarding the ‘Prosauropoda’ in recent years. iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First, I would like to express sincere gratitude to Adam Yates for providing me with the opportunity to do ‘real’ palaeontology, and also for gladly sharing his considerable knowledge on sauropodomorph osteology and phylogenetics. This project would not have been possible without the continued (and continual) support (both emotionally and financially) of my parents, Alf and Glenda McPhee – Thank you.
    [Show full text]
  • Re-Description of the Sauropod Dinosaur Amanzia (“Ornithopsis
    Schwarz et al. Swiss J Geosci (2020) 113:2 https://doi.org/10.1186/s00015-020-00355-5 Swiss Journal of Geosciences ORIGINAL PAPER Open Access Re-description of the sauropod dinosaur Amanzia (“Ornithopsis/Cetiosauriscus”) greppini n. gen. and other vertebrate remains from the Kimmeridgian (Late Jurassic) Reuchenette Formation of Moutier, Switzerland Daniela Schwarz1* , Philip D. Mannion2 , Oliver Wings3 and Christian A. Meyer4 Abstract Dinosaur remains were discovered in the 1860’s in the Kimmeridgian (Late Jurassic) Reuchenette Formation of Moutier, northwestern Switzerland. In the 1920’s, these were identifed as a new species of sauropod, Ornithopsis greppini, before being reclassifed as a species of Cetiosauriscus (C. greppini), otherwise known from the type species (C. stewarti) from the late Middle Jurassic (Callovian) of the UK. The syntype of “C. greppini” consists of skeletal elements from all body regions, and at least four individuals of diferent sizes can be distinguished. Here we fully re-describe this material, and re-evaluate its taxonomy and systematic placement. The Moutier locality also yielded a theropod tooth, and fragmen- tary cranial and vertebral remains of a crocodylomorph, also re-described here. “C.” greppini is a small-sized (not more than 10 m long) non-neosauropod eusauropod. Cetiosauriscus stewarti and “C.” greppini difer from each other in: (1) size; (2) the neural spine morphology and diapophyseal laminae of the anterior caudal vertebrae; (3) the length-to-height proportion in the middle caudal vertebrae; (4) the presence or absence of ridges and crests on the middle caudal cen- tra; and (5) the shape and proportions of the coracoid, humerus, and femur.
    [Show full text]
  • The Pelvic and Hind Limb Anatomy of the Stem-Sauropodomorph Saturnalia Tupiniquim (Late Triassic, Brazil)
    PaleoBios 23(2):1–30, July 15, 2003 © 2003 University of California Museum of Paleontology The pelvic and hind limb anatomy of the stem-sauropodomorph Saturnalia tupiniquim (Late Triassic, Brazil) MAX CARDOSO LANGER Department of Earth Sciences, University of Bristol, Wills Memorial Building, Queens Road, BS8 1RJ Bristol, UK. Current address: Departamento de Biologia, Universidade de São Paulo (USP), Av. Bandeirantes, 3900 14040-901 Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil; [email protected] Three partial skeletons allow a nearly complete description of the sacrum, pelvic girdle, and hind limb of the stem- sauropodomorph Saturnalia tupiniquim, from the Late Triassic Santa Maria Formation, South Brazil. The new morphological data gathered from these specimens considerably improves our knowledge of the anatomy of basal dinosaurs, providing the basis for a reassessment of various morphological transformations that occurred in the early evolution of these reptiles. These include an increase in the number of sacral vertebrae, the development of a brevis fossa, the perforation of the acetabulum, the inturning of the femoral head, as well as various modifications in the insertion of the iliofemoral musculature and the tibio-tarsal articulation. In addition, the reconstruction of the pelvic musculature of Saturnalia, along with a study of its locomotion pattern, indicates that the hind limb of early dinosaurs did not perform only a fore-and-aft stiff rotation in the parasagittal plane, but that lateral and medial movements of the leg were also present and important. INTRODUCTION sisting of most of the presacral vertebral series, both sides Saturnalia tupiniquim was described in a preliminary of the pectoral girdle, right humerus, partial right ulna, right fashion by Langer et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Dinosaur Species List E to M
    Dinosaur Species List E to M E F G • Echinodon becklesii • Fabrosaurus australis • Gallimimus bullatus • Edmarka rex • Frenguellisaurus • Garudimimus brevipes • Edmontonia longiceps ischigualastensis • Gasosaurus constructus • Edmontonia rugosidens • Fulengia youngi • Gasparinisaura • Edmontosaurus annectens • Fulgurotherium australe cincosaltensis • Edmontosaurus regalis • Genusaurus sisteronis • Edmontosaurus • Genyodectes serus saskatchewanensis • Geranosaurus atavus • Einiosaurus procurvicornis • Gigantosaurus africanus • Elaphrosaurus bambergi • Giganotosaurus carolinii • Elaphrosaurus gautieri • Gigantosaurus dixeyi • Elaphrosaurus iguidiensis • Gigantosaurus megalonyx • Elmisaurus elegans • Gigantosaurus robustus • Elmisaurus rarus • Gigantoscelus • Elopteryx nopcsai molengraaffi • Elosaurus parvus • Gilmoreosaurus • Emausaurus ernsti mongoliensis • Embasaurus minax • Giraffotitan altithorax • Enigmosaurus • Gongbusaurus shiyii mongoliensis • Gongbusaurus • Eoceratops canadensis wucaiwanensis • Eoraptor lunensis • Gorgosaurus lancensis • Epachthosaurus sciuttoi • Gorgosaurus lancinator • Epanterias amplexus • Gorgosaurus libratus • Erectopus sauvagei • "Gorgosaurus" novojilovi • Erectopus superbus • Gorgosaurus sternbergi • Erlikosaurus andrewsi • Goyocephale lattimorei • Eucamerotus foxi • Gravitholus albertae • Eucercosaurus • Gresslyosaurus ingens tanyspondylus • Gresslyosaurus robustus • Eucnemesaurus fortis • Gresslyosaurus torgeri • Euhelopus zdanskyi • Gryponyx africanus • Euoplocephalus tutus • Gryponyx taylori • Euronychodon
    [Show full text]
  • Rodrigo Temp Müller
    UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DE SANTA MARIA CENTRO DE CIÊNCIAS NATURAIS E EXATAS PROGRAMA DE PÓS-GRADUAÇÃO EM BIODIVERSIDADE ANIMAL Rodrigo Temp Müller DESCRIÇÃO E POSICIONAMENTO FILOGENÉTICO DE UM NOVO ESPÉCIME DE SAUROPODOMORFA DA FORMAÇÃO CATURRITA Santa Maria, RS, Brasil 2016 Rodrigo Temp Müller DESCRIÇÃO E POSICIONAMENTO FILOGENÉTICO DE UM NOVO ESPÉCIME DE SAUROPODOMORFA DA FORMAÇÃO CATURRITA Dissertação apresentada ao Curso de Mestrado do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Biodiversidade Animal, Área de Concentração em Sistemática e Biologia Evolutiva, da Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM, RS), como requisito parcial para obtenção do grau de Mestre em Ciências Biológicas - Área Biodiversidade Animal. Orientador: Prof. Dr. Sérgio Dias da Silva Co-orientador: Prof Dr. Max Cardoso Langer Santa Maria, RS, Brasil 2016 Rodrigo Temp Müller DESCRIÇÃO E POSICIONAMENTO FILOGENÉTICO DE UM NOVO ESPÉCIME DE SAUROPODOMORFA DA FORMAÇÃO CATURRITA Dissertação apresentada ao Curso de Mestrado do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Biodiversidade Animal, Área de Concentração em Sistemática e Biologia Evolutiva, da Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM, RS), como requisito parcial para obtenção do grau de Mestre em Ciências Biológicas - Área Biodiversidade Animal. Aprovado em 22 de Fevereiro de 2016: Sérgio Dias da Silva, Dr. (Presidente/Orientador) Felipe Lima Pinheiro, Dr. (UNIPAMPA) Marco Brandalise de Andrade, Dr. (PUCRS) Santa Maria, RS 2016 AGRADECIMENTOS Aos meus pais, Estefânia Temp Müller e Gercides Müller por todo o apoio das diversas maneiras. Cada parte deste e qualquer outro estudo que eu venha a desenvolver terá algo de vocês. Ao Dr. Sérgio Dias da Silva pela orientação ao longo do mestrado e por possibilitar que eu continue fazendo o que gosto.
    [Show full text]