Can free software replace proprietary software for graphic production? Investigating to which extent free software can be used for book and magazine production. 2013-04-25 Staffan Melin, D89,
[email protected] Master´s thesis in Media Technology, School of Computer Science and Communication at the Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License. Abstract Free and open source software is widely used. At the same time there are several areas where it is not. One of these is graphic production where the applications from Adobe – Indesign, Photoshop and Illustrator – dominates. In this thesis I start by describing a workflow for graphic production. Next I research the field of free software and put together a set of tools that fit into this workflow. The choices are made on the basis of functionality and how they work together. I then go on to apply these tools to two real world scenarios: production of a book and a magazine. The results show that free software can be used for graphic production without any loss of quality and only minor problems compared to the proprietary tools. A look into future development shows that the bulk of these problems are being taken care of by the open source community. Keywords: free software, open source, proprietary software, graphic production, graphic design, FLOSS, FOSS, layout, libre, Scribus, Inkscape, GIMP, GNOME Color Manager. Sammanfattning Fri och open source programvara används på många områden. Samtidigt finns det många områden där det inte används. Ett av dessa är grafisk produktion där programmen från Adobe – Indesign, Photoshop och Illustrator – dominerar.