Chapter 3 Biodiversity in the Ocean and Its Ecosystem Service

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Chapter 3 Biodiversity in the Ocean and Its Ecosystem Service Chapter 3 Biodiversity in the ocean and its ecosystem service In this chapter, functions of the ocean and the current status of the marine biodiversity at the global level and for water around Japan will be identified and summarized to provide prerequisites for preparation of the basic concepts for conservation and sustainable use of marine biodiversity. 1. What are the biodiversity and various fauna and flora. circulations occur there. Evaporation of water the ecosystem service? The blessings people can obtain from such from the ocean plays a major role in sustaining Ever since beginning of its primitive form, ecosystems where various organisms interact the atmosphere-to-land circulation of water. life has repeated adaptation, evolution and are called “ecosystem services.” They include Along with water, the ocean transports heat, extinction in response to various changes “provisioning services” of resources such as it mitigates drastic changes of the climate of environment on the Earth, to create the seafood and the genetic resources for medicine, through its interactions with the atmosphere, present diversity of as many as 30 million “regulating services” for stable climate and and maintains the temperature within the species4 and their associations. “Biodiversity” clean water, “cultural services” to provide acceptable range for occurrence and growth could be referred to as the “character” and recreational and mental benefits such as sea of organisms. The ocean is deeply involved in “interconnection” of life created through the bathing, and “supporting services” such as the weather around the world and the climate long history of evolution. Human being is one nutrient circulation and photosynthesis5. kinetics. There occur and grow a variety of of the species which constitute the biodiversity, Facilitation of the objectives of the Convention organisms in the ocean, and diverse ecosystems and the biodiversity provides foundation for its on Biological Diversity, or conservation and are established there. survival. sustainable use of the biodiversity requires In recent years, there is increasing attention In the Convention on Biological Diversity, understanding of the fact that there are multiple on relationship between the ocean and the “biodiversity” is defined as the variability levels of the biodiversity as mentioned above, climate change. The ocean has not only a lot of among all organisms. Included are not only and it is important to address all levels rather water but also a plenty of carbon as a “carbon “species diversity” which is occurrence of than any single level. reservoir”. Annual net primary production of various species of fauna and flora, but also marine phytoplankton would be around 50 “intra-species (genetic) diversity” which is 2. Functions of the ocean and billion tons of carbon equivalent. This would variation in a single species according to characteristics of its ecosystems be almost equal to that of terrestrial plants, and localities, etc., and “ecosystem diversity” which (1) Physical functions and blessings from the ocean is very important as a sink for carbon refers to the variety of ecosystems such as the ocean dioxide. forests, rivers, tidal flats and coral reefs, which Ocean covers an extensive part of the Human life has been closely related to the are composed of the interrelation between Earth, and large-scale horizontal and vertical ocean with multi-functions ever since the 4 Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005) Ecosystem and Human Well-being Vol.1. 5 Field, C. B., M. J. Behrenfeld, J. T. Randerson and P. Falkowski (1998) Primary production of the biosphere: Integrating terrestrial and oceanic components. Science 281: 237-240. 8 Marine Biodiversity Conservation Strategy Chapter 3 Biodiversity in the ocean and its ecosystem service primary producer in the ocean, and this is Approximately a half of the world’s ocean quite different from the terrestrial ecosystem is ocean flats, or flat bottoms. However, four where large plants such as trees are the major plates collide to each other in marine areas producer. In the ocean, turnover of the primary around the Japanese Archipelago on the eastern production occurs quickly and the material edge of the Eurasian Continent, and their circulation rate through the grazing food chain submersions have created marine trenches and and microbial food chain is high. Materials, the diverse and complex bottom topography therefore, do not stay for a long time in the with drastic changes in water depth. It is ancient times. As the quantity and quality of form of the primary producers as on land. characteristic to Japan that the majority of its human activities increase, there occurs more For example, at transition regions where exclusive economic zone is deep water, with utilization of the ocean. different ocean currents or water bodies are limited shallow water over the continental shelf Direct blessings from the ocean to human in contact, cold seawater with rich nutrients and within the inland sea and bay. beings include means for transportation, supply mixes with warm surface water to stimulate As for the average water depth around of food, water, mineral and energy, and space productions of phytoplankton and attract many Japan, the East China Sea is shallow and for recreation and mental stability. In particular, organisms of higher trophic levels in the food around 300m deep, but the Sea of Japan and unexploited energy and mineral resources have web. However, one must keep in mind that the Sea of Okhotsk are about 1700m deep, and been recently identified in the ocean through the status of ecosystems changes drastically the Pacific Ocean is around 4200m deep8. A Chapter 3 various surveys and researches on the ocean. with changes of physicochemical conditions. relatively gentle continental shelf of 0 to 200m When such resources are utilized, efforts have For instance, environmental changes due to deep extends out from the continent in the East to be made to accomplish their sustainable the global-scale climate change, such as the China Sea southwest to the line between the development, and to establish and maintain an regime shift with intervals of several decades Korean Peninsula and the Noto Peninsula and ecosystem service the ocean and its Biodiversity in international order on the use of energy and and El Niño and La Niña, significantly alter in water west to Hokkaido and coastal water of mineral resources. productions and distributions of organisms. the Sea of Okhotsk. On the Pacific side, there Approximately 230 thousand species6 have are very steep bottom topographies down to (2) Characteristics of marine ecosystems been identified for marine organisms, but the depth of 4,000 to 6,000m, such as the Japan Important in consideration on the marine our knowledge on marine species is limited Trench and the Izu-Ogasawara Trench running environment and the ecosystems there is the compared to terrestrial ones. Many new species south from Honshu and the Nansei Islands existence of an extensive water body. In the are still discovered even in shallow waters, Trench (Ryukyu Trench) from Kyushu to ocean, there are layers with different water and it is expected that there are many unknown Okinawa. There are also a series of seamounts flow at different depths, and organisms and species. As for higher taxa, among all of the such as the Nansei Islands Ridge (Ryukyu ecosystems distribute three-dimensionally. 35 animal phyla7, 34 of them include species Ridge) and the Izu-Ogasawara Ridge on the Plants with photosynthesis as primary occurring in the ocean, and 16 phyla are found Pacific side. There are relatively wide undersea producers occur in photic zones down to about only in the ocean. It could be said that there are basins at the depth of about 2,000m, such as the 200m from the water surface, and on sea more morphological variations among marine Japan Basin in the Sea of Japan and the Kuril bottoms of the shallow coastal water. There organisms than terrestrial ones. Basin in the Sea of Okhotsk. occur completely different ecosystems in the Diverse environment is created in Japanese deep sea. (3) Characteristics of the marine environment water due to many warm and cold currents In the ocean, many organisms migrate for and ecosystems around Japan such as the Kuroshio Current (warm current) a long distance during their life history. In Japan is surrounded on its four sides by the addition, water, or where they occur and grow, Pacific Ocean, the East China Sea, the Sea also moves around. These lead to very high of Japan and the Sea of Okhotsk. Consisting mobility of organisms. In other words, there is of approximately 6,000 islands including a highly continuous space from the polar region Hokkaido, Honshu, Shikoku, Kyushu and to the tropics, and complex interactions among Okinawa, Japan has one of the world’s widest organisms exist over a wide area. closed sea and exclusive economic zone of Microscopic phytoplankton is the major approximately 4.47 million km2 around it. 6 Fujikura et al, (2010) Marine Biodiversity in Japanese Waters. PLoS ONE 7 According to the classification by The Union of Japanese Societies for Systematic Biology 8 National Institutes of Natural Sciences, National Astronomical Observatory of Japan (2009) Chronological Scientific Tables 2010 Marine Biodiversity Conservation Strategy 9 and the Oyashio Current (cold current) flowing rich in biodiversity. For example, the “intertidal water, coastal ecosystems maintain habitats and along Japan, and the Japanese Archipelago of zone” between the high tide and low tide lines environment for organisms, and they contribute numerous islands extending from the south to repeatedly emerges and submerges with the significantly to the protection of biodiversity. north with a wide range of climate zones from tidal rhythm. Duration of time under seawater Under unique environments such as the deep subarctic to tropical ones. In the north, drift ice varies depending on the height to produce sea and the hydrothermal vent, there occur covers the Sea of Okhotsk in winter, and unique differences in environmental factors such as organisms completely different from those in habitat and environment are created by sea ice.
Recommended publications
  • Ecological Principles and Function of Natural Ecosystems by Professor Michel RICARD
    Intensive Programme on Education for sustainable development in Protected Areas Amfissa, Greece, July 2014 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Ecological principles and function of natural ecosystems By Professor Michel RICARD Summary 1. Hierarchy of living world 2. What is Ecology 3. The Biosphere - Lithosphere - Hydrosphere - Atmosphere 4. What is an ecosystem - Ecozone - Biome - Ecosystem - Ecological community - Habitat/biotope - Ecotone - Niche 5. Biological classification 6. Ecosystem processes - Radiation: heat, temperature and light - Primary production - Secondary production - Food web and trophic levels - Trophic cascade and ecology flow 7. Population ecology and population dynamics 8. Disturbance and resilience - Human impacts on resilience 9. Nutrient cycle, decomposition and mineralization - Nutrient cycle - Decomposition 10. Ecological amplitude 11. Ecology, environmental influences, biological interactions 12. Biodiversity 13. Environmental degradation - Water resources degradation - Climate change - Nutrient pollution - Eutrophication - Other examples of environmental degradation M. Ricard: Summer courses, Amfissa July 2014 1 1. Hierarchy of living world The larger objective of ecology is to understand the nature of environmental influences on individual organisms, populations, communities and ultimately at the level of the biosphere. If ecologists can achieve an understanding of these relationships, they will be well placed to contribute to the development of systems by which humans
    [Show full text]
  • An Introduction to Coastal and Marine Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services
    Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change, Government of India Curriculum on Coastal and Marine Biodiversity and Protected Area Management Module 1 An Introduction to Coastal and Marine Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services For Field-Level MPA Managers Imprint Training Resource Material: Coastal and Marine Biodiversity and Protected Area Management for Field-Level MPA Managers Module 1: An Introduction to Coastal and Marine Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services Module 2: Coastal and Marine Biodiversity and Ecosystems Services in the Overall Environment and Development Context Module 3: Mainstreaming Coastal and Marine Biodiversity into Overall Development and Environmental Planning Module 4: Coastal and Marine Protected Areas and Sustainable Fisheries Management Module 5: Governance, Law and Policies for Managing Coastal and Marine Ecosystems, Biodiversity and Protected Areas Module 6: Assessment and Monitoring of Coastal and Marine Biodiversity and Relevant Issues Module 7: Effective Management Planning of Coastal and Marine Protected Areas Module 8: Communicating Coastal and Marine Biodiversity Conservation and Management Issues ISBN 978-81-933282-1-7 October 2015 Published by: Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH Wildlife Institute of India (WII) Indo-German Biodiversity Programme P.O. Box 18, Chandrabani A-2/18, Safdarjung Enclave Dehradun 248001 New Delhi 110029, India Uttarakhand, India T +91-11-4949 5353 T +91-135-2640 910 E [email protected] E [email protected] W http://www.indo-germanbiodiversity.com W www.wii.gov.in GIZ is a German government-owned not-for-profit enterprise supporting sustainable development. This training resource material has been developed under the Human Capacity Development component of the project ‘Conservation and Sustainable Management of Existing and Potential Coastal and Marine Protected Areas (CMPA)’, under the Indo-German Biodiversity Programme, in partnership with the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change (MoEFCC), Government of India.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecosystem Diversity Report George Washington National Forest Draft EIS April 2011
    Appendix E Ecosystem Diversity Report George Washington National Forest Draft EIS April 2011 U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service Southern Region Ecosystem Diversity Report George Washington National Forest April 2011 Appendix E Ecosystem Diversity Report George Washington National Forest Draft EIS April 2011 Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS .............................................................................................................. I 1.0 INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................................. 1 2.0 ECOLOGICAL SUSTAINABILITY EVALUATION PROCESS ................................... 3 3.0 ECOLOGICAL SYSTEMS .................................................................................................. 7 3.1 Background and Distribution of Ecosystems ..................................................................................................... 7 North-Central Appalachian Acidic Swamp ............................................................................................................ 10 3.2 Descriptions of the Ecological Systems ............................................................................................................ 10 3.2.1 Spruce Forest: Central and Southern Appalachian Spruce-Fir Forest .......................................................... 10 3.2.2 Northern Hardwood Forest : Appalachian (Hemlock)- Northern Hardwood Forest ..................................... 11 3.2.3 Cove Forest: Southern and Central
    [Show full text]
  • Global Marine Biodiversity Trends 95
    Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 2006. 31:93-122 doi: 10.1146/annurev.energy.31.020105.100235 Copyright (c) 2006 by Annual Reviews. All rights reserved First published online as a Review in Advance on August 10, 2006 G lobal M a r in e B iodiversity T r e n d s Enric Sala and Nancy Knowlton Center for Marine Biodiversity and Conservation, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California 92093-0202; email: [email protected], [email protected] Key Words historical change, human impacts, natural disturbances ■ Abstract Marine biodiversity encompasses all levels of complexity of life in the sea, from within species to across ecosystems. At all levels, marine biodiversity has naturally exhibited a general, slow trajectory of increase, punctuated by mass extinc­ tions at the evolutionary scale and by disturbances at the ecological scale. In historical times, a synergy of human threats, including overfishing, global warming, biological introductions, and pollution, has caused a rapid decline in global marine biodiversity, as measured by species extinctions, population depletions, and community homog­ enization. The consequences of this biodiversity loss include changes in ecosystem function and a reduction in the provision of ecosystem services. Global biodiversity loss will continue and likely accelerate in the future, with potentially more frequent ecological collapses and community-wide shifts. However, the timing and magnitude of these catastrophic events are probably unpredictable. CONTENTS INTRODUCTION
    [Show full text]
  • Ecological Sustainability
    ECOLOGICAL SUSTAINABILITY INTRODUCTION Over the last half-century, ecologists have learned much about how ecosystems contribute to the fulfillment of human life. Most obviously, ecosystems provide many of the goods that are harvested and traded in the human economy -- food, fiber, timber, forage, biomass fuels, and many pharmaceuticals (Daily 1997a). Ecosystems also provide indirect benefits to humans through their impacts on nutrient flux and cycling, mitigation of flood and drought, and maintenance of biodiversity, all of which feedback in important ways on the production of ecosystem goods that humans directly derive from ecosystems (Chapin et al. 1996). Finally, ecosystems also provide less tangible, but equally important, benefits in the form of recreational, spiritual, and intellectual stimulation (Postel and Carpenter 1997). Despite widespread public awareness of the direct benefits that humans derive from ecosystems, the full magnitude of benefits attributable to ecosystems is woefully underappreciated by the public (Daily 1997b). The public’s failure to recognize these benefits increases the likelihood that natural resources will be managed and developed in a manner that leads to ecosystem degradation. Such resource development, in conjunction with increasing human populations and land use intensification, can stress ecosystems to a point where their ability to provide the aforementioned benefits is compromised (Rapport et al. 1985). Concern that the human enterprise may jeopardize the viability of ecosystems (Vitousek et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Indicators of Biodiversity for Ecologically Sustainable Forest Management
    Essays Indicators of Biodiversity for Ecologically Sustainable Forest Management DAVID B. LINDENMAYER,* CHRIS R. MARGULES,† AND DANIEL B. BOTKIN‡ *Centre for Resource and Environmental Studies & Department of Geography, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia, email [email protected] †CSIRO Division of Wildlife and Ecology, GPO Box 284, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia, email [email protected] ‡George Mason University, Fairfax, VA 22202, and The Center for the Study of the Environment, P.O. Box 6945, Santa Barbara, CA 93160, U.S.A., email [email protected] Abstract: The conservation of biological diversity has become one of the important goals of managing for- ests in an ecologically sustainable way. Ecologists and forest resource managers need measures to judge the success or failure of management regimes designed to sustain biological diversity. The relationships between potential indicator species and total biodiversity are not well established. Carefully designed studies are re- quired to test relationships between the presence and abundance of potential indicator species and other taxa and the maintenance of critical ecosystem processes in forests. Other indicators of biological diversity in forests, in addition or as alternatives to indicator species, include what we call structure-based indicators. These are stand-level and landscape-level (spatial) features of forests such as stand structural complexity and plant species composition, connectivity, and heterogeneity. Although the adoption of practices to sustain (or recreate) key characteristics of forest ecosystems appear intuitively sensible and broadly consistent with cur- rent knowledge, information is lacking to determine whether such stand- and landscape-level features of for- ests will serve as successful indices of (and help conserve) biodiversity.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ocean Genome: Conservation and the Fair, Equitable and Sustainable Use of Marine Genetic Resources
    Commissioned by BLUE PAPER The Ocean Genome: Conservation and the Fair, Equitable and Sustainable Use of Marine Genetic Resources LEAD AUTHORS Robert Blasiak, Rachel Wynberg, Kirsten Grorud-Colvert and Siva Thambisetty CONTRIBUTING AUTHORS Narcisa M. Bandarra, Adelino V.M. Canário, Jessica da Silva, Carlos M. Duarte, Marcel Jaspars, Alex D. Rogers, Kerry Sink and Colette C.C. Wabnitz oceanpanel.org About the High Level Panel for a Sustainable Ocean Economy The High Level Panel for a Sustainable Ocean Economy (Ocean Panel) is a unique initiative by 14 world leaders who are building momentum for a sustainable ocean economy in which effective protection, sustainable production and equitable prosperity go hand in hand. By enhancing humanity’s relationship with the ocean, bridging ocean health and wealth, working with diverse stakeholders and harnessing the latest knowledge, the Ocean Panel aims to facilitate a better, more resilient future for people and the planet. Established in September 2018, the Ocean Panel has been working with government, business, financial institutions, the science community and civil society to catalyse and scale bold, pragmatic solutions across policy, governance, technology and finance to ultimately develop an action agenda for transitioning to a sustainable ocean economy. Co-chaired by Norway and Palau, the Ocean Panel is the only ocean policy body made up of serving world leaders with the authority needed to trigger, amplify and accelerate action worldwide for ocean priorities. The Ocean Panel comprises members from Australia, Canada, Chile, Fiji, Ghana, Indonesia, Jamaica, Japan, Kenya, Mexico, Namibia, Norway, Palau and Portugal and is supported by the UN Secretary-General's Special Envoy for the Ocean.
    [Show full text]
  • Marine Ecosystems and Fisheries
    MARINE ECOSYSTEMS AND FISHERIES Balancing Ecosystem Sustainability and the Socio-Economics of Fisheries This Report Is Part Of The Ocean On The Edge Series Produced By The Aquarium Of The Pacific As Products Of Its National Conference—Ocean On The Edge: Top Ocean Issues, May 2009 2 MARINE ECOSYSTEMS AND FISHERIES Ocean on the Edge: Top Ocean Issues Making Ocean Issues Come Alive for the Public The conference brought together leading marine scientists and engineers, policy-makers, film-makers, exhibit designers, informal science educators, journalists and communicators to develop a portfolio of models for communicating major ocean issues to the public. This report is one of a series of reports from that conference. The reports include: Coastal Hazards, Marine Ecosystems and Fisheries, Pollution in the Ocean, and Critical Condition: Ocean Health and Human Health. There is also a series of briefer reports on film-making, kiosk messaging design, and communicating science to the public. All reports are available at www.aquariumofpacific.org MARINE ECOSYSTEMS AND FISHERIES 3 4 MARINE ECOSYSTEMS AND FISHERIES Acknowledgements Support for the “Ocean on the Edge Confer- and Robert Stickney, PhD. Participants fluctu- ence: Top Ocean Issues” was provided by ated during the various workshop sessions. NOAA, the National Science Foundation, Corinne Monroe and Alexi Holford were Southern California Edison, SAVOR, the Long the rapporteurs. Contributors to this report Beach Convention Center, and the Aquarium who provided editorial comments were Mark of the Pacific. Helvey and Craig Heberer of NOAA and members of his staff. This report was facilitat- We are grateful to the Conference’s National ed by Corinne Monroe with assistance from Advisory Panel that provided valuable guid- Erica Noriega.
    [Show full text]
  • Effects of Biodiversity on Ecosystem Functioning: a Consensus of Current Knowledge
    Ecological Monographs, 75(1), 2005, pp. 3±35 q 2005 by the Ecological Society of America ESA Report EFFECTS OF BIODIVERSITY ON ECOSYSTEM FUNCTIONING: A CONSENSUS OF CURRENT KNOWLEDGE D. U. HOOPER,1,16 F. S . C HAPIN, III,2 J. J. EWEL,3 A. HECTOR,4 P. I NCHAUSTI,5 S. LAVOREL,6 J. H. LAWTON,7 D. M. LODGE,8 M. LOREAU,9 S. NAEEM,10 B. SCHMID,4 H. SETAÈ LAÈ ,11 A. J. SYMSTAD,12 J. VANDERMEER,13 AND D. A. WARDLE14,15 1Department of Biology, Western Washington University, Bellingham, Washington 98225 USA 2Institute of Arctic Biology, University of Alaska, Fairbanks, Alaska 99775 USA 3Institute of Paci®c Islands Forestry, Paci®c Southwest Research Station, USDA Forest Service, 1151 Punchbowl Street, Room 323, Honolulu, Hawaii 96813 USA 4Institute of Environmental Sciences, University of Zurich, Winterthurerstrasse 190, CH-8057 ZuÈrich, Switzerland 5CEBC-CNRS, 79360 Beauvoir-sur-Niort, France 6Laboratoire d'Ecologie Alpine, CNRS UMR 5553, Universite J. Fourier, BP 53, 38041 Grenoble Cedex 9, France 7Natural Environment Research Council, Polaris House, North Star Avenue, Swindon SN2 1EU, UK 8Department of Biological Sciences, P.O. Box 369, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, Indiana 46556-0369 USA 9Laboratoire d'Ecologie, UMR 7625, Ecole Normale SupeÂrieure, 46 rue d'Ulm, 75230 Paris Cedex 05, France 10Department of Ecology, Evolution and Environmental Biology, Columbia University, 1200 Amsterdam Avenue, New York, New York 10027 USA 11University of Helsinki, Department of Ecological and Environmental Sciences, Niemenkatu 73, FIN-15140 Lahti, Finland 12U.S. Geological Survey, Mount Rushmore National Memorial, 13000 Highway 244, Keystone, South Dakota 57751 USA 13Department of Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109 USA 14Landcare Research, P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • Diversity of Plant Species in Paddy Ecosystem in West Sumatra, Indonesia
    BIODIVERSITAS ISSN: 1412-033X Volume 18, Number 3, July 2017 E-ISSN: 2085-4722 Pages: 1218-1225 DOI: 10.13057/biodiv/d180346 Diversity of plant species in paddy ecosystem in West Sumatra, Indonesia ENIE TAURUSLINA AMARULLAH1,2,♥, TRIZELIA3, YAHERWANDI3, HASMIANDY HAMID3 1Food and Horticulture Plant Protection Office of West Sumatra. Complex Agriculture Office, Jl. Raya Padang-Indarung Km.8, Bandar Buat, Padang 25231, West Sumatra, Indonesia. Tel. +62-751-72701, Fax. +62-751-72702, ♥email: [email protected] 2 Universitas Andalas, Campus Limau Manih, Padang 24063, West Sumatra, Indonesia 3Departement of Plant Protection, Faculty of Agriculture, Universitas Andalas. Campus Limau Manih, Padang 24063, West Sumatra, Indonesia Manuscript received: 21 September 2016. Revision accepted: 25 July 2017. Abstract. Tauruslina EA, Trizelia, Yaherwandi, Hamid H. 2017. Diversity of plant species in paddy ecosystem in West Sumatra. Biodiversitas 18: 1218-1225. Community is a group of living things which have adjusted and inhabited a natural habitat. Characteristics of the community in an environment are its diversity. The diversity of the plants is a plant species that occupy an ecosystem. The research was aimed at determining species diversity, the dominance of plant species and summed dominance ratio (SDR) in paddy ecosystem. The plant samples were taken from the location of endemic areas of brown plant hopper in Tanjung Mutiara Subdistrict, Agam District West Sumatra. Sampling was done by using two methods, (i) survey methods with direct data collection; (ii) squares method, observation of sample plots in the field. The level of diversity of plant species was analyzed using diversity index of Shannon- Wiener (H’).
    [Show full text]
  • Sample Student Edition CHAPTER 6 for Review Purposes Only 2
    Sample Student Edition CHAPTER 6 For Review Purposes Only 2 BiologyMiller & Levine ogy Student Edition Sampler Biol Chapter 6 Communities and Ecosystem Dynamics Miller & Levine & Miller Chapter Opener/Case Study .......................................... 4 Lesson 6.1 Habitats, Niches, and Species Interactions .................... 6 Lesson 6.2 Succession .................................................................... 14 Lesson 6.3 Biodiversity, Ecosystems, and Resilience ..................... 18 Case Study Wrap-Up ................................................... .22 Study Guide .................................................................. 24 Performance-Based Assessment ................................. .26 Assessment ................................................................... 28 End-of-Course Assessment .......................................... 31 3 Communities and CHAPTER 6 Ecosystem Dynamics CASE STUDY 6.1 6.2 6.3 Habitats, Niches, and Succession Biodiversity, Ecosystems, How do species interactions shape Go Online to Species Interactions and Resilience access your digital course. ecosystems? VIDEO As dusk falls over Yellowstone National Park, elk emerge from dense woods to browse on ten- Beavers build dams that der willows along a stream. Suddenly, they freeze. An instant later, wolves dash from the forest, AUDIO shape river ecosystems. aiming for a kill. The elk react in the nick of time, bolting out of reach. This hunt, like most, has INTERACTIVITY failed. But those elk have been attacked here before. Will
    [Show full text]
  • CHAPTER 12 the Critical Ecosystem Assessment Model (Cream)
    CHAPTER 12 The Critical Ecosystem Assessment Model (CrEAM): Identifying Healthy Ecosystems for Environmental Protection Planning Mary L. White1, Charles G. Maurice1, Amy Mysz1, Thomas Brody1 1United States Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5 ABSTRACT The Critical Ecosystems Assessment Model (CrEAM) is a screening tool that evaluates the ecological condition of undeveloped landscapes across the Midwest States of Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Minne- sota, Ohio, and Wisconsin. Landscape-level ecological condition is defined by three equally weighted assessment criteria: 1) ecosystem diversity, 2) stressors, and 3) rarity. We defined ecological diversity as the predicted diversity of populations, communities, and ecosystems; stressors as the amount of fragmentation, and chemical and physical pressure; and rarity as both land cover rarity and biological rarity. The Critical Ecosystems Assessment Model (CrEAM) integrates data that describe these three criteria in a geographic information system (GIS). The base map of the CrEAM is a matrix of 300m x 300m cells generated by aggregating the 30 x 30 meter pixels of the 1992 National Land Cover Da- tabase (1992 NLCD). Data from the 1992 NLCD, along with twelve other pre-existing data sets were processed to generate twenty indicators of condition: four for diversity, twelve for stressors, and four for rarity. The data in each layer provide a measurable output for each of the cells in the matrix. These measures were normalized. Results were generated for each criterion and combined into a final com- posite map depicting landscape-level ecological condition. Field validation is underway. The resulting scores from these maps were compared with a previous analysis of the same six states, where natural resource partners identified the ecosystems that were most important to them and where they were concentrating their efforts.
    [Show full text]