DOCSLIB.ORG

Lowes Creek Maryland Precinct ABORIGINAL CULTURAL HERITAGE ASSESSMENT REPORT for Macarthur Developments

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Lowes Creek Maryland Precinct ABORIGINAL CULTURAL HERITAGE ASSESSMENT REPORT for Macarthur Developments c Lowes Creek Maryland Precinct ABORIGINAL CULTURAL HERITAGE ASSESSMENT REPORT For Macarthur Developments Public Version – Site Locations Removed September 2018 EXTENT HERITAGE / Lowes Creek Maryland Precinct: Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Assessment Report i Document Control Page AUTHOR/HERITAGE ADVISOR: Emma Beckett & Fenella Atkinson CLIENT: Macarthur Developments PROJECT NAME: SYD16178 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Lowes Creek Maryland Precinct, Camden LGA EXTENT HERITAGE PTY LTD INTERNAL REVIEW/SIGN OFF WRITTEN BY DATE VERSION REVIEWED APPROVED Emma Beckett & Fenella Atkinson 22.9.16 Desktop Alan Williams Fenella Atkinson & Emma Beckett 13.3.16 Draft Alan Williams Fenella Atkinson 30.3.17 Final Draft Alan Williams Fenella Atkinson & Alan Williams 24.4.17 Final Draft Fenella Atkinson 6.12.17 Final Bridget San Miguel 18.09.18 Minor Fenella Atkinson Revisions Copyright and Moral Rights Historical sources and reference materials used in the preparation of this report are acknowledged and referenced in figure captions or in text citations. Reasonable effort has been made to identify, contact, acknowledge and obtain permission to use material from the relevant copyright owners. Unless otherwise specified in the contract terms for this project Extent Heritage Pty Ltd: • Vests copyright of all material produced by Extent Heritage Pty Ltd (but excluding pre-existing material and material in which copyright is held by a third party) in the client for this project (and the client’s successors in title); • Retains the use of all material produced by Extent Heritage Pty Ltd for this project for Extent Heritage Pty Ltd’s ongoing business and for professional presentations, academic papers or publications. EXTENT HERITAGE / Lowes Creek Maryland Precinct: Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Assessment Report ii Executive Summary Extent Heritage Pty Ltd has been commissioned by Macarthur Developments (the proponent), to prepare an Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Assessment Report (ACHAR) for the Lowes Creek Maryland Precinct within the South West Growth Area (hereafter the ‘study area’). The study area has been released for urban development by the Government’s Precinct Acceleration Protocol, which allows for the early release of land for the development of Growth Centres (DPE, 2016). The report has been completed in accordance with the following relevant guidelines: • Guide to Investigating, Assessing and Reporting on Aboriginal Cultural Heritage in NSW (Office of Environment and Heritage [OEH] 2011). • Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Consultation Requirements for Proponents 2010 (Department of Environment, Climate Change and Water [DECCW] 2010a). • Code of Practice for Archaeological Investigation of Aboriginal Objects in New South Wales (DECCW 2010b). • Precinct assessment method for Aboriginal cultural heritage in the Sydney Growth Centres (Context Pty Ltd 2006a). • Protocol for Aboriginal Stakeholder Involvement in the Assessment of Aboriginal Heritage in the Sydney Growth Centres (Context Pty Ltd 2006b). Results The investigation undertaken for the ACHAR has resulted in the identification of an Aboriginal heritage resource that can be discussed according to four overlapping categories: • 22 identified Aboriginal archaeological sites. These generally consist of small artefact distributions and isolated objects found on the ground surface in disturbed areas (where ground surface visibility is high). Most are considered to be of low scientific significance, given the disturbed context, although sites with associated potential archaeological deposit have been assessed as having moderate scientific significance. One culturally scarred tree has also been recorded, and is considered to be of moderate scientific significance. • Zones of medium and high Aboriginal archaeological potential. These areas have been identified based on previous archaeological studies in the region, which indicate that areas in close proximity to water sources have potential for cultural materials. Archaeological sites of higher scientific significance are likely to be located within these zones. • Areas of high cultural value. These areas have been identified tentatively, based on the results of the Aboriginal community consultation undertaken to date, and of previous heritage assessments in the local region. They include relatively undisturbed locations in which one or more archaeological sites are present; and significant landforms such as Lowes Creek, the Maryland ridge and the Birling spur. • Potential contact and post-contact Aboriginal archaeological remains. Aboriginal individuals are known to have been employed by Robert Lowe, the owner of Birling in the 19th Century. Any associated archaeological evidence would be located within the former homestead complex. Although no direct documentary evidence has been found, the history of the local area indicates that Aboriginal people may also have camped on this property, and on nearby Maryland, in the 19th century. There is some potential for the presence of associated Aboriginal (contact and post-contact) archaeological remains in these areas. However, the evidence EXTENT HERITAGE / Lowes Creek Maryland Precinct: Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Assessment Report iii presently available does not suggest that this potential for contact or post-contact cultural materials is any more likely within the wider study area than the general region. Further investigation is required in order to characterise the resource. In particular, the presence of archaeological deposits within the areas of potential has not yet been confirmed. The following additional research is recommended: • Continued Aboriginal community consultation to provide an assessment of the social / spiritual significance of the archaeological resource, and further detail regarding any intangible values. • Archaeological test excavation of the three identified sites that have potential archaeological deposits. • Archaeological test excavation to determine the presence and nature of the archaeological remains within the areas of high and medium archaeological potential. The results of this investigation would provide data for the following: • To allow exploration of avoidance of key sites/deposits and/or minimise impact where possible. • To allow a more detailed impact assessment to be made, and appropriate management measures to be developed. • To provide adequate documentation for an AHIP application, if required. The additional investigation will be undertaken following approval of the ILP, and the results will inform detailed master planning for the study area. Aboriginal community consultation Aboriginal community consultation, in accordance with the OEH guidelines, has resulted in the identification of 19 Registered Aboriginal Parties (RAPs) with an interest in the project. Comments received to date from the RAPs relate to the pre- and post-contact Aboriginal heritage values of the locality and the study area specifically, and to involvement of RAP representatives in the heritage management process. In brief: • Members of some of the RAPs grew up in the area; localities mentioned include Appin, Camden, Liverpool, Bringelly, Airds and Campbelltown. • The area is significant due to the presence of archaeological remains relating to past Aboriginal occupation, and due to continued Aboriginal occupation in the contact and post-contact period. • Archaeological test excavation will be required in order to properly understand the Aboriginal heritage of the study area. • Aboriginal archaeological sites should be protected. • Conservation of Aboriginal sites will require Aboriginal community consultation, and protection from impact of any sort. • If Aboriginal objects are recovered from archaeological investigations, they should be reburied on site close to their original location. • RAP representatives should be involved in all Aboriginal heritage investigation and management works undertaken for the proposed development. • RAP representatives should monitor earthworks. • The watercourses running through the study area should be protected. • The new development should incorporate Aboriginal heritage interpretation, including use of Aboriginal names, and construction of a keeping place and/or exhibition centre. Consultation undertaken by Extent Heritage for an earlier project also identified a concern with the potential presence of contact-period Aboriginal sites within the Maryland property. EXTENT HERITAGE / Lowes Creek Maryland Precinct: Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Assessment Report iv Potential impact Rezoning of the study area will not in itself result in Aboriginal heritage impact. However, the potential heritage impact of development in accordance with the zoning proposed in the Indicative Layout Plan (IILP) has been assessed. A detailed impact assessment will be developed once the recommended further investigation has been completed. It is expected that the recommended investigation and detailed assessment will be undertaken following approval of the ILP and during the master planning phase of the project. • Identified Aboriginal archaeological sites. There is potential for full conservation of 11 of the 22 identified Aboriginal archaeological sites within the study area. The information presently available indicates that redevelopment according to the ILP will result in complete removal of nine of the 22 sites, and partial removal of one more. Proposed zoning that will result in development where impact may be avoided includes passive open space, environmental conservation,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Appendix 3 – Maps Part 5
    LEGEND LGAs Study area FAIRFIELD LGA ¹ 8.12a 8.12b 8.12c 8.12d BANKSTOWN LGA 8.12e 8.12f 8.12i ROCKDALE LGA HURSTVILLE LGA 8.12v 8.12g 8.12h 8.12j 8.12k LIVERPOOL LGA NORTH BOTANY BAY CITY OF KOGARAH 8.12n 8.12o 8.12l 8.12m 8.12r 8.12s 8.12p 8.12q SUTHERLAND SHIRE 8.12t 8.12u COORDINATE SCALE 0500 1,000 2,000 PAGE SIZE FIG NO. 8.12 FIGURE TITLE Overview of Site Specific Maps DATE 17/08/2010 SYSTEM 1:70,000 A3 © SMEC Australia Pty Ltd 2010. Meters MGA Z56 All Rights Reserved Data Source - Vegetation: The Native Vegetation of the Sydney Metropolitan Catchment LOCATION I:Projects\3001765 - Georges River Estuary Process Management Authority Area (Draft) (2009). NSW Department of Environment, Climate Change PROJECT NO. 3001765 PROJECT TITLE Georges River Estuary Process Study CREATED BY C. Thompson Study\009 DATA\GIS\ArcView Files\Working files and Water. Hurstville, NSW Australia. LEGEND Weed Hotspot Priority Areas Study Area LGAs Riparian Vegetation & EEC (Moderate Priority) Riparian Vegetation & EEC (High Priority) ¹ Seagrass (High Priority) Saltmarsh (High Priority) Estuarine Reedland (Moderate Priority) Mangrove (Moderate Priority) Swamp Oak (Moderate Priority) Mooring Areas River Area Reserves River Access Cherrybrook Park Area could be used for educational purposes due to high public usage of the wharf and boat launch facilities. Educate on responsible use of watercraft, value of estuarine and foreshore vegetation and causes and outcomes of foreshore FAIRFIELD LGA erosion. River Flat Eucalypt Forest Cabramatta Creek (Liverpool LGA) - WEED HOT SPOT Dominated by Balloon Vine (Cardiospermum grandiflorum) and River Flat Eucalypt Forest Wild Tobacco Bush (Solanum mauritianum).
    [Show full text]
  • Download the Paper (Pdf)
    Department of Agriculture, Fisheries & Forestry ASSESSMENT OF RISK OF SPREAD FOR STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT OF THE CORE ALLIGATOR WEED INFESTATIONS IN AUSTRALIA - TAKING STOCK FINAL REPORT October 2008 Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry Assessment of Risk of Spread for Strategic Management of the Core Alligator Weed Infestations in Australia- ‘Taking Stock’ CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL FOR ISSUE OF DOCUMENTS Report Title: Final Report Document Status: Final Report Document No: NE210541-2008 Date of Issue: 10/10/2008 Assessment of Risk of Spread for Strategic Management Client: Department of Agriculture, Project Title: of the Core Alligator Weed Infestations in Australia - Fisheries & Forestry Taking Stock Comments: Position Name Signature Date Prepared by: Principal Consultant Dr. Nimal Chandrasena 10 October 2008 DAFF, CMAs, DPI, Peer Review by: LGAs and various Given in acknowledgements July-August 2008 others For further information on this report, contact: Name: Dr. Nimal Chandrasena Title: Principal Ecologist, Ecowise Environmental Address: 24 Lemko Place, Penrith, NSW 2750 Phone: 4721 3477 Mobile: 0408 279 604 E-mail: [email protected] Document Revision Control Version Description of Revision Person Making Issue Date Approval 1 Working Draft Dr. Nimal Chandrasena 27 July 2008 2 Final Draft Dr. Nimal Chandrasena 10 October 2008 © Ecowise Environmental Pty Ltd This Report and the information, ideas, concepts, methodologies, technologies and other material remain the intellectual property of Ecowise Environmental Pty Ltd. Disclaimer This document has been prepared for the Client named above and is to be used only for the purposes for which it was commissioned. No warranty is given as to its suitability for any other purpose.
    [Show full text]
  • Cabramatta Creek Floodplain Management Study & Plan
    CABRAMATTA CREEK FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT STUDY & PLAN Overlooking Cabramatta Creek and Warwick Farm Racecourse during the 1986 flood (photo courtesy Liverpool City Council) UPDATED REPORT October 2004 Bewsher Consulting Pty Ltd Floodplain Management Consultants LIVERPOOL CITY COUNCIL FAIRFIELD CITY COUNCIL CABRAMATTA CREEK FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT STUDY & PLAN UPDATED REPORT OCTOBER 2004 Prepared by: BEWSHER CONSULTING PTY LTD P O BOX 352 EPPING NSW 1710 Telephone (02) 9868 1966 Facsimile (02) 9868 5759 E-mail: [email protected] ACN 003137068 Cabramatta Creek Floodplain Management Study and Plan Bewsher Consulting Pty Ltd Updated Report, October 2004 J1150-FPMS-V3.doc TABLE OF CONTENTS Page SUMMARY 1 1. INTRODUCTION 5 1.1 ABOUT THE UPDATED STUDY 5 1.2 OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY 5 1.3 THE STUDY AREA 6 1.4 THE GOVERNMENT’S FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT PROCESS 6 1.5 THE STUDY TEAM 9 1.6 OUTCOMES OF THE STUDY 9 2. BACKGROUND INFORMATION 11 2.1 PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION 11 2.2 HISTORY OF FLOODING 12 2.3 AERIAL MAPPING 14 2.4 SOCIAL CONTEXT 14 2.5 ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES 18 2.6 PLANNING ISSUES 18 2.7 PREVIOUS INVESTIGATIONS 19 2.8 INVESTIGATIONS UNDERTAKEN SINCE 1999 22 3. ANALYSIS OF FLOOD BEHAVIOUR 26 3.1 METHODOLOGY 26 3.2 RAFTS HYDROLOGIC MODELLING 26 3.3 UPDATED RAFTS MODEL 27 3.4 RMA-2V HYDRAULIC MODELLING 29 3.5 EXISTING FLOOD CONDITIONS 31 3.6 FLOOD BEHAVIOUR FOR DIFFERENT DEVELOPMENTSCENARIOS 36 3.7 ACCURACY OF MODEL RESULTS 36 3.8 RECENT FLOOD MODELLING 37 3.8 FLOOD RISK MAPPING 39 4. FLOOD DAMAGE ASSESSMENT 41 4.1 FLOOD DAMAGES DATA BASE 41 4.2 TYPES OF FLOOD DAMAGE 42 4.3 BASIS OF FLOOD DAMAGES CALCULATIONS 43 4.4 SUMMARY OF FLOOD DAMAGES 44 4.5 SUMMARY OF PROPERTY INUNDATION 47 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Government Gazette No 164 of Friday 23 April 2021
    GOVERNMENT GAZETTE – 4 September 2020 Government Gazette of the State of New South Wales Number 164–Electricity and Water Friday, 23 April 2021 The New South Wales Government Gazette is the permanent public record of official NSW Government notices. It also contains local council, non-government and other notices. Each notice in the Government Gazette has a unique reference number that appears in parentheses at the end of the notice and can be used as a reference for that notice (for example, (n2019-14)). The Gazette is compiled by the Parliamentary Counsel’s Office and published on the NSW legislation website (www.legislation.nsw.gov.au) under the authority of the NSW Government. The website contains a permanent archive of past Gazettes. To submit a notice for gazettal, see the Gazette page. By Authority ISSN 2201-7534 Government Printer NSW Government Gazette No 164 of 23 April 2021 DATA LOGGING AND TELEMETRY SPECIFICATIONS 2021 under the WATER MANAGEMENT (GENERAL) REGULATION 2018 I, Kaia Hodge, by delegation from the Minister administering the Water Management Act 2000, pursuant to clause 10 of Schedule 8 to the Water Management (General) Regulation 2018 (the Regulation) approve the following data logging and telemetry specifications for metering equipment. Dated this 15 day of April 2021. KAIA HODGE Executive Director, Regional Water Strategies Department of Planning, Industry and Environment By delegation Explanatory note This instrument is made under clause 10 (1) of Schedule 8 to the Regulation. The object of this instrument is to approve data logging and telemetry specifications for metering equipment that holders of water supply work approvals, water access licences and Water Act 1912 licences and entitlements that are subject to the mandatory metering equipment condition must comply with.
    [Show full text]
  • SBS 8 1973 Symposium
    PROGRAMME ",d ABSTRACTS loc the EI GHT H SYMP O SI UM "ADVANCES IN THE STUDY OF THE SYDNEY BASIN" DEPARTMENT Of GEOLOGY THE UNIVERSITY OF NEWCA STLE N.S.w., 2306 THE UNIVERSITY OF NEWCASTLE DEPARTMENT OF GEOLOGY • .... • . ~ .' PROGRAMME and ABSTRACTS for the EIGHTH SYMPOSIUM on "ADVANCES IN THE STUDY OF THE SYDNEY BASIN" 27th April to the 29th April, 1973 Convenor: ASSOC. PROF. C. F. K. DIESSEL Department of Geology, The University of Newcastle 559.4405 Advances in the study of the Sydney Basin; abstracts of the symposia: (annual) 1st symposium 1966 to 4th symposium 1969. Newcastle, University of Newcastle, Department of Geology. Published as one volume with individual title pages. From 5th symposium 1970 title changed to Advances in the study of the Sydney Basin; programme and abstracts, which see also. Geology - N.S.W. - Congresses University of Newcastle - Department of Geology Symposium on Advances in the study of the Sydney Basin, University of Newcastle (s) 559.4405 Advances in the study of the Sydney Basin; programme and abstracts of the symposia: (annual) 5th symposium 1970 to date. Newcastle, University of Newcastle, De­ partment of Geology. Previously known as Advances in the study of the Sydney Basin; abstracts of the symposia, which see also. Geology - N.S.W. - Congresses University of Newcastle - Department of Geology Symposium on Advances in the study of the Sydney Basin, University of Newcastle (5) 2 • :.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.: .. :.: .. :.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.: .. :.. :.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.: .. :.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:. :.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.: . • FORWARD Welcome to the Eighth Newcastle Symposium. This year the format of the Symposium has been chang­ ed to allow greater participation on the part of all regis­ trants.
    [Show full text]
  • Orielton Park Homestead Estate Landscape Conservation Management Plan Prepared by Tropman & Tropman Architects
    Orielton Park Homestead Estate 183 The Northern Road, Harrington Park, NSW Landscape Conservation Management Plan prepared for Dandaloo Developments Pty Ltd NSW SEPTEMBER 2017 REF: 1321: LCMP Issue 06 Tropman & Tropman Architects Architecture Conservation Landscape Interiors Urban Design Interpretation 55 Lower Fort Street Sydney NSW 2000 Phone: (02) 9251 3250 Fax: (02) 9251 6109 Website: www.tropmanarchitects.com.au Email: [email protected] TROPMAN AUSTRALIA PTY LTD ABN 71 088 542 885 INCORPORATED IN NEW SOUTH WALES Lester Tropman Architects Registration: 3786 John Tropman Architects Registration: 5152 Tropman & Tropman Architects i Orielton Park Homestead Estate Ref: 1321: LCMP Landscape Conservation Management Plan SEPTEMBER 2017 Report Register The following table is a report register tracking the issues of the Orielton Park Homestead Estate Landscape Conservation Management Plan prepared by Tropman & Tropman Architects. Tropman & Tropman Architects operate under a quality management system, and this register is in compliance with this system. Project Issue Description Prepared Checked Issued To Issue Date Ref No. No. by by 1321:LCMP 01 Draft Orielton Park Lester Lester Terry Goldacre 16.01.14 Homestead Estate Tropman Tropman Trevor Jensen Landscape Conservation Joanne By Email Management Plan Lloyd Draft Orielton Park Lester Lester Terry Goldacre November 1321:LCMP 02 Homestead Estate Tropman Tropman Trevor Jensen 2014 Landscape Conservation Linda By Email Management Plan Storey Orielton Park Homestead Lester Lester
    [Show full text]
  • Cabramatta Creek Flood Investigation
    The quality of this digital copy is an accurate reproduction of the original print copy b J U g f O < 5 s u b r a r J&.&£/ E UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES WATER RESEARCH LABORATORY REPORT No. 25 k |. Cabramatta Creek Flood Investigation Hoxton Park — Green Valley Housing Development *>y E, M. Laurenson SEPTEMBER, I960 The University of Hew South Wales WATER RESEARCH LABORATORY »T , r * *f| -^K * * ■ i „■;,. OABRAMATTA CREEK FLOOD INVESTIGATION Horton Park ~ Green Valley Housing Development by EoMo USJBESSOB Report to The Housing Commission of New South Wales September 1960o https://doi.org/10.4225/53/578821948edbe MTlIt LAfiUIWtU*! (i) PR-'gACS This investigation was undertaken "by the Water Research Laboratory of the University of lew South Wales? Manly Vale N«S»W0 for Uni search Ltd© on behalf of the Housing Ooranieeion of lew South Wales© The investigation was carried out by Hr0 Hole Laurenson BoEo,AoM.XoE©, Ausi®, Lecturer in Civil Engineering® Some of the routine computations and drafting was performed by members of the University0 s technical staff under Mrohaurenson0 s direction© Land survey data, aerial photographs and the general plan of the proposed development scheme were provided by the Housing Commission of New South Wales© Some of the information used in the hydrologic investigation was drawn from data obtained from nearby experimental catchments operated by the School of Civil Engineering of the University of New South Wales© The study was commenced on 15th July 19^0 and completed on 21st September I960© Ho R? Valientins
    [Show full text]
  • Greater Macarthur Investigation Area Aboriginal and Historic Heritage Gap Analysis • October 2015 0 ARCHAEOLOGICAL & HERITAGE MANAGEMENT SOLUTIONS
    ARCHAEOLOGICAL & HERITAGE MANAGEMENT SOLUTIONS Greater Macarthur Investigation Area Aboriginal and Historic Heritage - Gap Analysis and Future Direction Final Department of Planning & Environment 25 May 2015 Greater Macarthur Investigation Area Aboriginal and Historic Heritage Gap Analysis • October 2015 0 ARCHAEOLOGICAL & HERITAGE MANAGEMENT SOLUTIONS AUTHOR/HERITAGE ADVISOR Alan Williams, Matthew Kelly, Ngaire Richards PROPONENT Department of Planning & Environment Greater Macarthur Aboriginal and Historic Cultural PROJECT NAME Heritage - Gap Analysis and Future Direction Various REAL PROPERTY DESCRIPTION DATE 7 October 2015 AHMS INTERNAL REVIEW/SIGN OFF WRITTEN BY DATE VERSION REVIEWED APPROVED 1 Susan McIntyre- AW, MK, NR 2.4.15 Preliminary Fenella Atkinson Tamwoy 2 Final Susan McIntyre- Susan McIntyre- AW, MK 25.5.15 Draft Tamwoy Tamwoy AW 7.10.15 Final Minor edits Copyright and Moral Rights Historical sources and reference materials used in the preparation of this report are acknowledged and referenced in figure captions or in text citations. Reasonable effort has been made to identify, contact, acknowledge and obtain permission to use material from the relevant copyright owners. Unless otherwise specified in the contract terms for this project AHMS: Vests copyright of all material produced by AHMS (but excluding pre-existing material and material in which copyright is held by a third party) in the client for this project (and the client’s successors in title); Retains the use of all material produced by AHMS for this project for AHMS ongoing business and for professional presentations, academic papers or publications. Greater Macarthur Investigation Area Aboriginal and Historic Heritage Gap Analysis • October 2015 1 ARCHAEOLOGICAL & HERITAGE MANAGEMENT SOLUTIONS CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • State of the Cumberland Plain Report 2017-2018
    About this report The Cumberland Plain, Western Sydney is our home - and it is in crisis. Government policy on population, planning and biodiversity are driving some of the highest rates of landclearing seen anywhere in the world and forcibly displacing entire rural communities. Our communities and our ecosystems are at breaking point: this is a war on people, community and the wild. This report outlines the state of the natural environment of Cumberland Plain in 2018 in our own voices. The Cumberland Plain is more than just an ecosystem or a calculation of hectares conserved and lost: it is our home and the traditional lands of the Darug and Gundungurra people. This report presents a review of the state of the environment in Western Sydney from the voices of local experts and volunteers here on the ground. The report has been published by the The Greater Sydney Landcare Network (GSLN), a membership-based community organisation that aims to support individuals and groups who are working to protect, restore and improve the natural environment of Greater Sydney. The report has been developed collectively through the Cumberland Conservation Network (CCN), an informal network of over 80 local conservation-minded people in Western Sydney. The CCN brings together the local environment groups, community champions, Bushcare and Landcare leaders, teachers, ecologists and government staff to provide a common voice on issues we care about. A number of incorporated groups have also provided support to this report including: ● Greater Sydney Landcare Network ● National Parks Association - Macarthur Branch ● Blacktown & District Environment Group ● Mulgoa Landcare ● Razorback Environment Protection Society Cover: Eastern Grey Kangaroos at Shanes Park.
    [Show full text]
  • 7. Moorebank Hydrogeological Landscape
    7. Moorebank Hydrogeological Landscape MOOREBANK, CHIPPING NORTON, LOCALITIES GEORGES HALL, LANSDOWNE, FAIRFIELD EAST Land Salt Salinity Export TYPE AREA MOOREBANK Moderate Low GRID REFERENCE 297700 mE 6270000 mN (Z 56) Water EC GEOLOGY SHEET PENRITH 1:100 000 Low CONFIDENCE LEVEL MEDIUM O V E R V I E W The Moorebank Hydrogeological Landscape (HGL) is characteristic of areas of Neogene (Pliocene) alluvial deposits contained within the floodplain of the Georges River, particularly around Chipping Norton Lake in the suburbs of Chipping Norton, Moorebank, Lansdowne, Georges Hall and Fairfield East. Landscape features typically include broad, flat alluvial plains, splays and levees which are intersected by present day drainage channels and narrow drainage lines. This HGL is distinguished from other areas within the Sydney Metropolitan CMA by its very flat, broad and low lying alluvial plain and slowed flow/ponding within the bend in the Georges River around the Chipping Norton Lake area. The bend in the river has allowed Tertiary Alluvium to form the very flat lying landscape. The Moorebank HGL is distinct from the Parramatta/Georges River HGL because of this terminal-like ponding of the river, and that it is not heavily influenced by acid sulfate soils which produce a different salinity signature. This HGL comprises Neogene Alluvium (clayey quartzose sand and clay under the Georges River as part of the old fluvial environment) with small areas of Hawkesbury Sandstone (medium to very coarse-grained sandstone, minor laminated mudstone and siltstone lenses), and Wianamatta Group Shales and Sandstone (Ashfield Shale which is dark-grey to black claystone-siltstone and fine sandstone-siltstone laminite, and some Bringelly shale which is shale, carbonaceous claystone, claystone, laminite, fine to medium-grained lithic sandstone, rare coal and tuff).
    [Show full text]
  • Land Capability, Salinit R Ty & Cont North We M Report 73 Taminatio
    Report on Land Capability, Salinity & Contamination Investigation Volume 1 - Introduction Vineyard Precinct North West Priority Growth Area Prepared for Mott MaccDonald Pty Ltd Project 73895 Report 73895-1, Volume 1 Rev 1 November 2016 Douglas Partners Pty Ltd ABN 75 053 980 117 www.douglaspartners.com.au 96 Hermitage Road West Ryde NSW 2114 PO Box 472 West Ryde NSW 1685 Phone (02) 9809 0666 Fax (02) 9809 4095 Page i of vii Executive Summary 1. Introduction This report provides the results of the Land Capability, Salinity and Contamination Investigation for the Vineyard Precinct of the North West Priority Growth Area (the Precinct). The investigation has been conducted to support the current rezoning process, which is proposed to be conducted in a staged manner. The rezoning will allow for urban development, including residential and employment related development. 2. Summary of Land Capability Investigation Geotechnical Results 2.1 Geology A review of available geology maps for the Precinct (Penrith 1:100 000 Geological Series Sheet 1) indicates that the Precinct is underlain rocks of the Wianamatta Group (Ashfield Shale, Minchinbury Sandstone and Bringelly Shale) as well as by Quaternary and Tertiary age sediments (associated with recent and ancient watercourses). In summary, the underlying geology and lateral extent of the formations and associated soils comprise; Ashfield Shale (mapping unit Rwa) underlies much of the mid-slope parts of the Precinct, and this formation typically comprises shale, laminite and dark grey siltstone sometimes with a relatively deep, clay soil profile. the more elevated ridge line along the northern boundary area, as well as the north-western part of the Precinct are mapped as being underlain by Bringelly Shale (mapping unit Rwb).
    [Show full text]
  • The Geology of NSW
    The Geology of NSW The geological characteristics and history of NSW with a focus on coal seam gas (CSG) resources A report commissioned for the NSW Chief Scientist’s Office, May, 2013. Authors: Dr Craig O’Neill1, [email protected] Dr Cara Danis1, [email protected] 1Department of Earth and Planetary Science, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, 2109. Contents A brief glossary of terms i 1. Introduction 01 2. Scope 02 3. A brief history of NSW Geology 04 4. Evolution of the Sydney­Gunnedah­Bowen Basin System 16 5. Sydney Basin 19 6. Gunnedah Basin 31 7. Bowen Basin 40 8. Surat Basin 51 9. Clarence­Moreton Basin 60 10. Gloucester Basin 70 11. Murray Basin 77 12. Oaklands Basin 84 13. NSW Hydrogeology 92 14. Seismicity and stress in NSW 108 15. Summary and Synthesis 113 ii A brief Glossary of Terms The following constitutes a brief, but by no means comprehensive, compilation of some of the terms used in this review that may not be clear to a non‐geologist reader. Many others are explained within the text. Tectono­thermal: The involvement of either (or both) tectonics (the large‐scale movement of the Earth’s crust and lithosphere), and geothermal activity (heating or cooling the crust). Orogenic: pertaining to an orogen, ie. a mountain belt. Associated with a collisional or mountain‐building event. Ma: Mega‐annum, or one million years. Conventionally associated with an age in geochronology (ie. million years before present). Epicratonic: “on the craton”, pertaining to being on a large, stable landmass (eg.
    [Show full text]