Final Report Annexes

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Final Report Annexes BANGLADESH WATER DEVELOPMENT BOARD THE PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF BANGLADESH THE PROJECT FOR CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT OF MANAGEMENT FOR SUSTAINABLE WATER RELATED INFRASTRUCTURE IN THE PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF BANGLADESH FINAL REPORT ANNEXES SEPTEMBER 2017 JAPAN INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION AGENCY (JICA) IDEA Consultants, Inc. INGEROSEC Corporation GE EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCE Co., Ltd. JR 17-110 LIST OF ANNEXES ANNEX 1: Design Manual for River Embankment ANNEX 2: Construction Manual for River Embankment ANNEX 3: Operation and Maintenance Manual for Hydraulic Structures ANNEX 4: User’s’ Manual for O&M GIS Database ANNEX 5: Action Plan for Dissemination and Effective Use of Manuals ANNEX 1: Design Manual for River Embankment BANGLADESH WATER DEVELOPMENT BOARD THE PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF BANGLADESH DESIGN MANUAL FOR RIVER EMBANKMENT IN BANGLADESH September 2017 PREPARED BY THE PROJECT FOR CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT OF MANAGEMENT FOR SUSTAINABLE WATER RELATED INFRASTRUCTURE Table of Content PREFACE ................................................................................................................................................ 1 1. PREREQUISITES CONCERNING RIVER EMBANKMENT DESIGN ..................................... 4 2. BASICS OF EMBANKMENT DESIGN ....................................................................................... 7 2.1 Required Functions of Embankments (General) .......................................................................... 7 2.2 Types of Embankments .................................................................................................................. 11 2.3 Embankment Design Procedure ................................................................................................... 11 2.4 Alignment of Embankment ........................................................................................................... 13 2.5 Set-Back .......................................................................................................................................... 14 2.6 Design Crest Level .......................................................................................................................... 14 2.6.1 Design Flood Level ................................................................................................................. 16 2.6.2 Selection of Design Flood Occurrence Frequency ................................................................... 18 2.6.3 Free Board ................................................................................................................................ 22 2.6.4 Extra Banking .......................................................................................................................... 24 2.7 Crest Width ..................................................................................................................................... 27 2.8 Side Slope ........................................................................................................................................ 28 2.9 Berm and Borrow Pits ................................................................................................................... 28 2.10 Selection of embankment materials ........................................................................................ 29 2.11 Compaction .................................................................................................................................. 31 3. DESIGN SPECIFICATION .......................................................................................................... 32 3.1 Slope Protection work .................................................................................................................... 32 3.1.1 General ..................................................................................................................................... 32 3.1.2 Projection of block .................................................................................................................. 32 3.1.3 Design of Revetments for embankment slope ......................................................................... 33 3.1.4 Block placement with open join .............................................................................................. 37 3.1.5 Toe Wall (Foundation work for slope protection blocks) ........................................................ 38 3.2 Seepage Protection Works ............................................................................................................. 39 3.2.1 General ..................................................................................................................................... 39 3.2.2 Methods in Embankment Body for Seepage Protection .......................................................... 39 (1) Cross Sectional Expansion Method ..................................................................... 39 (2) Surface Covering Method.................................................................................... 40 (3) Drain Method ...................................................................................................... 40 3.2.3 Method in Foundation Ground for Seepage Protection ........................................................... 43 (1) Method for shallow permeable foundation .......................................................... 43 1) River Side Seepage Control Method ....................................................................... 43 (2) Method for intermediate permeable foundation ..................................................... 44 (3) Method for deep permeable foundation ................................................................. 44 3.3 Toe Protection Works and Foot Protection Works ...................................................................... 45 i 3.4 Transition zone works and Edge Wall ......................................................................................... 45 3.5 Design of Crossing Structure of Embankment ........................................................................... 46 46 4. VERIFICATION OF EMBANKMENT SAFETY........................................................................ 47 4.1 General ............................................................................................................................................ 47 4.2 Verification of Embankment Safety with respect to Seepage ..................................................... 48 4.2.1 Embankment failure caused by Seepage .................................................................................. 48 4.2.2 Seepage Line and Piping .......................................................................................................... 50 4.2.3 Circular Slip (Sliding) .............................................................................................................. 51 4.3 Verification of Embankment Safety with respect to Erosion ................................................. 54 4.4 Verification of Embankment Safety with respect to Earthquake .............................................. 55 4.4.1 General ................................................................................................................................. 55 4.4.2 Basic policy .......................................................................................................................... 55 4.4.3 Determination of potential for liquefaction .......................................................................... 56 4.4.4 Liquefaction judgment and embankment stability calculation ............................................. 56 4.4.5 Calculation of subsidence amount ........................................................................................ 57 4.4.6 Strengthening work method ................................................................................................. 60 4.5 Verification of Embankment Safety with respect to bearing capacity of foundation ground .......................................................................................................................................................... 60 4.5.1 General ................................................................................................................................. 60 4.5.2 Process of sliding failure due to insufficient bearing capacity of a soft ground .................. 61 4.5.3 Soil constants for circular slide calculation of soft ground .................................................. 62 4.5.4 Countermeasures for stability of embankment constructed on soft ground ............................ 63 Annex-1 Pilot Project Design Report Annex-2 Assessment on Earthquake Resistance of the Embankment Appendix Assessment on Stability of Existing Embankment which is subject to flood water ii Preface The Standard Design Manual, comprising information and guidelines necessary for detailed design of structures pertaining to flood management works, irrigation works, drainage and road works of BWDB, was compiled by BWDB based on various overseas texts, publications, manuals and designs, etc. in 1995. The Design Manual for River Embankment in Bangladesh (Below, referred to as “design manual”) is prepared after reviewing the concerned sections of the current Standard Design Manual that pertains to river embankment design while taking the following points into consideration. (1) Almost the entire national land of Bangladesh is spread out over the downstream floodplains of three major rivers, the Ganges
Recommended publications
  • 1 Hydrological Impacts of Climate Change on Rice
    Hydrological impacts of climate change on rice cultivated riparian wetlands in the Upper Meghna River Basin (Bangladesh and India) Mohammed M. Rahman a,b,*, Julian R. Thompson b, and Roger J. Flower b a Department of Irrigation and Water Management, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh, Bangladesh b Wetland Research Unit, Department of Geography, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK * Corresponding author: email [email protected] Tel: +88 01717 825850; Fax: +88 091 61510 Abstract Riparian depressional wetlands (haors) in the Upper Meghna River Basin of Bangladesh are invaluable agricultural resources. They are completely flooded between June and November and planted with Boro rice when floodwater recedes in December. However, early harvest period (April/May) floods frequently damage ripening rice. A calibrated/validated Soil and Water Assessment Tool for riparian wetland (SWATrw) model is perturbed with bias free (using an improved quantile mapping approach) climate projections from 17 general circulation models (GCMs) for the period 2031–2050. Projected mean annual rainfall increases (200–500 mm per 7–10%). However, during the harvest period lower rainfall (21–75%) and higher evapotranspiration (1–8%) reduces river discharge (5–18%) and wetland inundation (inundation fraction declines of 0.005–0.14). Flooding risk for Boro rice consequently declines (rationalized flood risk reductions of 0.02–0.12). However, the loss of cultivable land (15.3%) to increases in permanent haor inundation represents a major threat to regional food security. Keywords haor wetlands; Boro rice; floods; Bangladesh; climate change; SWAT 1 Introduction The potential consequences of climate change on hydrological processes and associated sectors such as water resources, agriculture, aquatic ecology and human livelihoods have been extensively documented (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • The Conservation Action Plan the Ganges River Dolphin
    THE CONSERVATION ACTION PLAN FOR THE GANGES RIVER DOLPHIN 2010-2020 National Ganga River Basin Authority Ministry of Environment & Forests Government of India Prepared by R. K. Sinha, S. Behera and B. C. Choudhary 2 MINISTER’S FOREWORD I am pleased to introduce the Conservation Action Plan for the Ganges river dolphin (Platanista gangetica gangetica) in the Ganga river basin. The Gangetic Dolphin is one of the last three surviving river dolphin species and we have declared it India's National Aquatic Animal. Its conservation is crucial to the welfare of the Ganga river ecosystem. Just as the Tiger represents the health of the forest and the Snow Leopard represents the health of the mountainous regions, the presence of the Dolphin in a river system signals its good health and biodiversity. This Plan has several important features that will ensure the existence of healthy populations of the Gangetic dolphin in the Ganga river system. First, this action plan proposes a set of detailed surveys to assess the population of the dolphin and the threats it faces. Second, immediate actions for dolphin conservation, such as the creation of protected areas and the restoration of degraded ecosystems, are detailed. Third, community involvement and the mitigation of human-dolphin conflict are proposed as methods that will ensure the long-term survival of the dolphin in the rivers of India. This Action Plan will aid in their conservation and reduce the threats that the Ganges river dolphin faces today. Finally, I would like to thank Dr. R. K. Sinha , Dr. S. K. Behera and Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Protection of Endangered Ganges River Dolphin in Brahmaputra River, Assam, India
    PROTECTION OF ENDANGERED GANGES RIVER DOLPHIN IN BRAHMAPUTRA RIVER, ASSAM, INDIA Final Technical Report to Sir Peter Scott Fund, IUCN Report submitted by - Abdul Wakid, Ph. D. Programme Leader Gangetic Dolphin Research & Conservation Programme, Aaranyak Survey, Beltola, Guwahati-781028 Assam, India Gill Braulik Sea Mammal Research Unit University of St. Andrews St. Andrews, Fife KY16 8LB, UK Page | 2 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT We are expressing our sincere thanks to Sir Peter Scott Fund of IUCN for funding this project. We are thankful to the Department of Environment & Forest (wildlife) and the management authority of Kaziranga National Park, Government of Assam for the permission to carry out the study, especially within Kaziranga National Park. Without the tremendous help of Sanjay Das, Dhruba Chetry, Abdul Mazid and Lalan Sanjib Baruah, the Project would not have reached its current status and we are therefore grateful to all these team members for their field assistance. The logistic support provided by the DFO of Tinsukia Wildlife Division and the Mongoldoi Wildlife Division are highly acknowledged. Special thanks to Inspector General of Police (special branch) of Assam Police Department for organizing the security of the survey team in all districts in the Brahamputra Valley. In particular Colonel Sanib, Captain Amrit, Captain Bikash of the Indian Army for the security arrangement in Assam-Arunachal Pradesh border and Assistant Commandant Vijay Singh of the Border Security Force for security help in the India-Bangladesh border area. We also express our sincere thanks to the Director of Inland Water Transport, Alfresco River Cruise, Mr. Kono Phukan, Mr. Bhuban Pegu and Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation of Gangetic Dolphin in Brahmaputra River System, India
    CONSERVATION OF GANGETIC DOLPHIN IN BRAHMAPUTRA RIVER SYSTEM, INDIA Final Technical Report A. Wakid Project Leader, Gangetic Dolphin Conservation Project Assam, India Email: [email protected] 2 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT There was no comprehensive data on the conservation status of Gangetic dolphin in Brahmaputra river system for last 12 years. Therefore, it was very important to undertake a detail study on the species from the conservation point of view in the entire river system within Assam, based on which site and factor specific conservation actions would be worthwhile. However, getting the sponsorship to conduct this task in a huge geographical area of about 56,000 sq. km. itself was a great problem. The support from the BP Conservation Programme (BPCP) and the Rufford Small Grant for Nature Conservation (RSG) made it possible for me. I am hereby expressing my sincere thanks to both of these Funding Agencies for their great support to save this endangered species. Besides their enormous workload, Marianne Dunn, Dalgen Robyn, Kate Stoke and Jaimye Bartake of BPCP spent a lot of time for my Project and for me through advise, network and capacity building, which helped me in successful completion of this project. I am very much grateful to all of them. Josh Cole, the Programme Manager of RSG encouraged me through his visit to my field area in April, 2005. I am thankful to him for this encouragement. Simon Mickleburgh and Dr. Martin Fisher (Flora & Fauna International), Rosey Travellan (Tropical Biology Association), Gill Braulik (IUCN), Brian Smith (IUCN), Rundall Reeves (IUCN), Dr. A. R. Rahmani (BNHS), Prof.
    [Show full text]
  • Impacts of Tipaimukh Dam on the Down-Stream Region in Bangladesh: a Study on Probable EIA
    www.banglajol.info/index.php/JSF Journal of Science Foundation, January 2015, Vol. 13, No.1 pISSN 1728-7855 Original Article Impacts of Tipaimukh Dam on the Down-stream Region in Bangladesh: A Study on Probable EIA M. Asaduzzaman1, Md. Moshiur Rahman 2 Abstract Amidst mounting protests both at home and in lower riparian Bangladesh, India is going ahead with the plan to construct its largest and most controversial 1500 mw hydroelectric dam project on the river Barak at Tipaimukh in the Indian state Manipur. In the process, however, little regard is being paid to the short and long-term consequences on the ecosystem, biodiversity or the local people in the river’s watershed and drainage of both upper and low reparian countries . This 390 m length and 162.8 m. high earthen-rock filled dam also has the potential to be one of the most destructive. In India too, people will have to suffer a lot for this mega project. The total area required for construction including submergence area is 30860 ha of which 20797 ha is forest land, 1195 ha is village land, 6160 ha is horticultural land, and 2525 ha is agricultural land. Cconstruction of the massive dam and regulate water flow of the river Barak will have long adverse effects on the river system of Surma and Kushiyara in the north-eastern region of Bangladesh which will obviously have negative impacts on ecology, environment, agriculture, bio-diversity, fisheries, socio-economy of Bangladesh. To assess the loss of Tipaimukh dam on downstream Bangladesh, an Eivironmental Impact Assessment (EIA) has been conducted based on probable affect parametes.
    [Show full text]
  • Pilot Project Report
    Appendix-2 THE PROJECT FOR CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT OF MANAGEMENT FOR SUSTAINABLE WATER RELATED INFRASTRUCTURE IN THE PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF BANGLADESH PILOT PROJECT REPORT JUNE 2017 JICA EXPERT TEAM A.2-1 Appendix-2 A.2-2 Appendix-2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents List of Tables List of Figures List of Attachment 1. General .......................................................................................................................................... 1 2. Selection of the Contractor ............................................................................................................ 2 2.1 Notification of Tender ................................................................................................................. 2 2.2 Tender, Tender Opening and Evaluation ..................................................................................... 2 2.3 Contract and Amendment of Contract ......................................................................................... 2 3. Implementation of the PRW .......................................................................................................... 4 3.1 Outline of the Works ................................................................................................................... 4 3.2 Organization of construction supervision .................................................................................... 7 3.3 Progress of the Works .................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Opportunities for Benefit Sharing in the Meghna Basin, Bangladesh And
    Opportunities for benefit sharing in the Meghna Basin, Bangladesh and India Scoping study Building River Dialogue and Governance (BRIDGE) Opportunities for benefit sharing in the Meghna Basin, Bangladesh and India Scoping study The designation of geographical entities in this report, and the presentation of the material, do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of IUCN concerning the legal status of any country, territory, or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The views expressed in this publication don’t necessarily reflect those of IUCN, Oxfam, TROSA partners, the Government of Sweden or The Asia Foundation. The research to produce this report was carried out as a part of Transboundary Rivers of South Asia (TROSA) programme. TROSA is a regional water governance programme supported by the Government of Sweden and implemented by Oxfam and partners in Bangladesh, India, Myanmar and Nepal. Comments and suggestions from the TROSA Project Management Unit (PMU) are gratefully acknowledged. Special acknowledgement to The Asia Foundation for supporting BRIDGE GBM Published by: IUCN, Bangkok, Thailand Copyright: © 2018 IUCN, International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources Reproduction of this publication for educational or other non-commercial purposes is authorised without prior written permission from the copyright holder provided the source is fully acknowledged. Reproduction of this publication for resale or other commercial purposes is prohibited without prior written permission of the copyright holder. Citation: Sinha, V., Glémet, R. & Mustafa, G.; IUCN BRIDGE GBM, 2018. Benefit sharing opportunities in the Meghna Basin. Profile and preliminary scoping study, Bangladesh and India.
    [Show full text]
  • 44167-015: Flood and Riverbank Erosion Risk Management
    Environmental Impact Assessment (draft) Project No.: 44167-015 August 2020 (2 of 2) Bangladesh: Flood and Riverbank Erosion Risk Management Investment Program – Project 2 Prepared by the Bangladesh Water Development Board for the Asian Development Bank. This environmental impact assessment is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB's Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. Your attention is directed to the “terms of use” section on ADB’s website. In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area. August 2020 page i 10 ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVES 368. The three sub-reaches selected for Project-2 of the FRERMIP physical works: JRB-1, JLB-2 and PBL-1, were chosen from 13 sub-reaches into which the FRERMIP program area was divided based on discussions among BWDB, ADB and the PPTA consultant. These 13 sub-reaches were evaluated using a multi-criteria assessment approach taking into consideration three primary criteria (riverbank erosion, flooding, and poverty) and several secondary criteria (related to planning, design, cost-benefit and safeguards issues). Of the six sub-reaches scoring highest1, these three sub-reaches were screened out due to a lack of active erosion and/or conflicts with other immediately planned interventions. 369. While riverbank protection was placed according to immediate needs especially for growth centers (“something to defend”), embankment construction considered alternatives especially for the area JLB-2.
    [Show full text]
  • Bibiyana II Gas Power Project
    Draft Environment and Social Compliance Audit Project Number: 44951 July 2014 BAN: Bibiyana II Gas Power Project Prepared by Bangladesh Centre for Advanced Studies and ENVIRON UK Limited for Summit Bibiyana II Power Company Limited The environment and social compliance audit report is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB's Board of Directors, Management, or staff. Your attention is directed to the “Terms of Use” section of this website. In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area. Preliminary Environmental and Social Audit (Construction Phase) Summit Bibiyana II Power Company Limited Project Parkul, Nabigonj, Habigonj, Bangladesh Prepared for: Summit Bibiyana II Power Company Limited Date and Version: July 2014 nd 2 Draft, Version 1 Author: Bangladesh Centre for Advanced Studies (BCAS) House 10, Road 16A, Gulshan-1, Dhaka-1212, Bangladesh Tel: (880-2) 8818124-27, 8852904, 8851237, Fax: (880-2) 8851417 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.bcas.net Contributor: ENVIRON UK Limited 8 The Wharf, Bridge Street, Birmingham, UK Tel: +44 (0)121 616 2180 Version Control The Preliminary Environmental and Social Audit report has been subject to the following revisions: First Draft Title: Preliminary Environmental and Social Audit report Date: July 2014 Author: Bangladesh Centre for Advanced Studies (BCAS) Contributor: ENVIRON UK Ltd Second Draft Title: Preliminary Environmental and Social Audit report Date: July 2014 Author: Bangladesh Centre for Advanced Studies (BCAS) Contributor: ENVIRON UK Ltd Table of Contents 1.
    [Show full text]
  • BAN: Urban Public and Environment Health Sector Development Program: Sylhet Secondary Transfer Stations
    Initial Environmental Examination ___ March 2013 BAN: Urban Public and Environment Health Sector Development Program: Sylhet Secondary Transfer Stations Prepared by the Local Government Division, Ministry of Local Government, Rural Development and Cooperatives, Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh for the Asian Development Bank CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS (as of 8 April 2013) Currency unit – Taka (Tk) Tk.1.00 = $0.01281 $1.00 = Tk. 78.075 ABBREVIATIONS ADB – Asian Development Bank BBS – Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics BCC – Behavior Change Communication BOD – Biochemical Oxygen Demand CC – City Corporations CCPIU - City Corporations Program Implementation Units COD – Chemical Oxygen Demand DES – Domestic Environmental Specialist DLS - Department of Livestock Services DO – Dissolved Oxygen DoE – Department of Environment DSC – Design, Supervision, and Construction Consultant DSCC – Dhaka South City Corporation DWASA – Dhaka Water Supply and Sewerage Authority EA – executing agency ECC – Environmental Clearance Certificate EIA – Environmental Impact Assessment EMP – Environmental Management Plan EU – European Unions HDPE – High Density Poly-Ethylene IEE – Initial Environmental Examination IES – International Environmental Specialist IMA – Independent Monitoring Agency LGD – Local Government Division LGRDC – Ministry of Local Government, Rural Development and Cooperatives NGO – nongovernmental organization OM – Operations Manual O&M – operation and maintenance PPTA – Project Preparation Technical Assistance RCC – Reinforced Cement
    [Show full text]
  • Promoting Trade and Tourism in Transboundary Waterways of Meghna Basin
    Promoting Trade and Tourism in Transboundary Waterways of Meghna Basin Promoting Trade and Tourism in Transboundary Waterways of Meghna Basin Published By D-217, Bhaskar Marg, Bani Park, Jaipur 302016, India Tel: +91.141.2282821, Fax: +91.141.2282485 Email: [email protected], Web site: www.cuts-international.org © CUTS International, 2019 First published: June 2019 Citation: CUTS (2019), Promoting Trade and Tourism in Transboundary Waterways of Meghna Basin Photographs: Karimganj Steamerghat (Assam) and Shnongpdeng (Meghalaya) ISBN: 978-81-8257-278-2 Printed in India by M S Printer, Jaipur This document is the output of the study designed and implemented by CUTS International and its strategic partner - Unnayan Shamannay - which contributes to the project ‘Inclusive Cross-border trade in Meghna Basin in South Asia’. More details are available at: www.cuts-citee.org/IW/ This work was carried out as part of the Transboundary Rivers of South Asia (TROSA, 2017-2021) – a regional water governance programme supporting poverty reduction initiatives in the river basins of Ganges-Brahmaputra- Meghna (GBM) and Salween. The programme is implemented by Oxfam and partners in Nepal, India, Bangladesh and Myanmar and funded by the Government of Sweden. Views expressed in this publication are those of the CUTS International and do not represent that of Oxfam or Government of Sweden. #1907, Suggested Contribution ₹250/US$25 2 Promoting Trade and Tourism in Transboundary Waterways of Meghna Basin Contents Abbreviations ......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Pdf | 661.81 Kb
    FLOOD INFORMATION CENTRE FLOOD FORECASTING & WARNING CENTRE BANGLADESH WATER DEVELOPMENT BOARD WAPDA BUILDING, 8TH FLOOR, DHAKA. E-mail: [email protected], [email protected], Site: http://www.ffwc.gov.bd Tel: 9553118, 9550755 Fax: 9557386 RAINFALL AND RIVER SITUATION SUMMARY AS ON JULY 26, 2016 OUTLOOK The Brahmaputra-Jamuna, Ganges-Padma and Surma-Kushiyara river systems are in rising trend. The Brahmaputra-Jamuna and Ganges-Padma river systems may likely to continue rising in next 72 hours. The Surma-Kushiyara river systems may likely to remain steady in next 24 hours. Flood Situation in some parts of low lands adjacent to Brahmaputra and Jamuna Rivers at Kurigram, Gaibandha, Jamalpur, Bogra, Serajganj, Natore districts, Ganges-Padma rivers at Rajbari, Manikganj, Munshiganj and Shariotpur districts may likely continue to deteriorate while Surma-Kushiyara rivers at Sylhet and Sunamganj districts may likely to remain steady in next 48 hours. Buriganga, Balu, Turag, Lakhya rivers around Dhaka City are in rising trend which may likely to continue in next 48 hours. Staions Above Danger Levels: As on 26 July 2016 09:00 am: Station name River Rise(+)/Fall(-) (cm) Above Danger during last 24 hours Level (cm) Kurigram Dharla -2 +98 Gaibandha Ghagot +39 +58 Chilmari Brahmaputra +10 +80 Bahadurabad Jamuna +19 +82 Sariakandi Jamuna +15 +62 Kazipur Jamuna +21 +29 Serajganj Jamuna +21 +43 Aricha Jamuna +18 0 Singra Gur +7 +8 Baghabari Atrai +19 +44 Elasin Dhaleswari +17 +89 Goalundo Padma +17 +35 Bhagyakul Padma +9 +7 Sureswar Padma -11 +4 Kanaighat Surma -4 +24 Sylhet Surma +3 +2 Sunamganj Surma -3 +79 Durgapur Someswari +157 +25 Jariajanjail Kangsha +14 +117 B.
    [Show full text]