DOCSLIB.ORG

Local Public Companies in the 25 Countries of The

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Local Public Companies in the 25 Countries of The LOCAL PUBLIC COMPANIES IN THE 15 MEMBERS EU AUSTRIA BELGIUM DENMARK FINLAND FRANCE GERMANY GREECE IRELAND ITALY NETHERLANDS PORTUGAL SPAIN SWEDEN UNITED CZECH ESTONIA HUNGARY LATVIA LITHUANIA POLAND SLOVAKIA SLOVENIA THE 10 NEW MEMBERS EU THE 25 COUNTRIES OF THE EUROPEAN UNION BEFORE 05.2004 (A) (B) (DK) ( FIN ) (F) (D) (GR) ( IRL ) (I) (NL) (P) (E) (S) KINGDOM (UK) REPUBLIC (CZ) ( EST ) (H) (LV) (LT) (P) (SK) (SLO) 8.1 million inhabitants 10.3 million inhabitants 5.3 million inhabitants 5.2 million inhabitants 59.5 million inhabitants 82.2 million inhabitants 10.6 million inhabitants 3.8 million inhabitants 57.8 million inhabitants 16.0 million inhabitants 10.0 million inhabitants 39.5 million inhabitants 8.9 million inhabitants 58.9 million inhabitants 10.3 million inhabitants 1.4 million inhabitants 10.0 million inhabitants 2.4 million inhabitants 3.7 million inhabitants 38.6 million inhabitants 5.4 million inhabitants 2.0 million inhabitants Capital city: Madrid Capital city: Wien Capital city: Brussels Capital city: Copenhagen Capital city: Helsinki Capital city: Paris Capital city: Berlin Capital city: Athens Capital city: Dublin Capital city: Rome Capital city: Amsterdam Capital city: Lisbon Capital city: Stockholm Capital city: London Capital city: Prague Capital city: Tallin Capital city: Budapest Capital city: Riga Capital city: Vilnius Capital city: Warsaw Capital city: Bratislava Capital city: Ljubljana Decentralised organisation: Decentralised organisation: Decentralised organisation: Decentralised organisation: Decentralisaed organisation: Decentralised organisation: Decentralised organisation: Decentralised organisation: Decentralised organisation: Decentralised organisation: Decentralised organisation: Decentralised organisation: Decentralised organisation: Decentralised organisation: Decentralised organisation: NLY Decentralised organisation: 589 municipalities (communes) Decentralised organisation: Decentralised organisation: Decentralised organisation: Decentralised organisation: Decentralised organisation: 8,106 municipalities (municipios) Decentralised organisation: 34 county councils, 2 regional 6,258 municipalities (obec) 247 municipalities (towns - linnad - 3,158 municipalities (község 547 municipalities (novads expec- 61 municipalities (savivaldybe) 2,489 municipalities (gmina) 2,920 municipalities (obec) among 193 municipalities (obcina) O 36,565 municipalities (communes) 13,854 municipalities (Gemeinden) 8,101 municipalities (comuni) 4,037 parishes (freguesias) 50 provinces (provincias) KOMMUNALE UNTERNEHMEN IN DEN 25 2,359 municipalities (Gemeinden) 10 provinces (provinces) 275 municipalities (kommuners) 448 municipalities (kunta) 96 departments (départements) 323 districts (Kreise) 133 rural communities (koinotita) 5 city councils and 80 town 504 municipalities (gemeente) 278 municipalities (municipalités) 290 municipalities (Kommun) assemblies, 1 regional parliament 14 regions (kraje) and rural municipalities - vallad) and város) ted to merge into 100 in 2004) Local government satellites: 373 counties (powiat) which 39 city districts Local government satellites: ONLY CYPRUS LUXEMBOURG LOCAL PUBLIC Local government satellites: 14 counties (amstskommuners) 900 municipalities (dimi) authorities 103 provinces (provinces) 12 provinces (provincie) 17 autonomous communities 20 counties (Landstigs) 36 metropolitain districts councils, LOCAL PUBLIC Local government satellites: Local government satellites: 22 regions (régions) Local government satellites: Local government satellites: Local government satellites: Local government satellites: 19 counties (megye) 26 counties public institutions 16 regions (województwa) 8 regions (Vyssie uzemmne celky) inter-municipal structures (regipe) & MALTA 589 public social welfare centers 50 departments (nomi) 29 county councils 20 regions (regioni) (comunidades autonomas) 238 rural district councils, DOES NOT HAVE COMPANIES = municipal internal bodies (Regiebe- Local government satellites: 250 inter-municipal structures and Local government satellites: municipal internal bodies (Regiebe- Local government satellites: 2 metropolitan areas (area metro- Local government satellites: inter-municipal structures inter-municipal structures Local government satellites: Local government satellites: 3,325 budgetary organisations Local government satellites: Local government satellites: public communal institutions COMPANIES = (centres publics d'aide sociale) Local government satellites: Local government satellites: 33 boroughs, 26 districts, DON'THAVE MITGLIEDSSTAATEN DER EUROPÄISCHEN UNION trieben, Eigenbetrieben) inter-municipal structures 19 inter-municipal regional 19,000 inter-municipal structures Local government satellites: 8 regional authorities inter-municipal structures politana) 1,047 inter-municipal structures 120 foundations 12,167 contributory organisations budgetary organisations budgetary organisations local government agencies 108 municipal enterprises inter-municipal structures 826 contributory organisations municipal internal bodies LOCAL PUBLIC LPCS 125 polders and wateringues trieb, Eigenbetrieb) 100 unitary authorities LPCS inter-municipal structures (Gemein- 224 local public companies structures (among which 2,360 with own tax inter-municipal structures Local government satellites: 2,000 inter-municipal structures water boards (Waterschappen) 44 municipal internal bodies (ser- (among which mancomunidades) 44 partnerships (příspěvkové organizace) (valla- või linnavalitsuse hallatav (önkormányzati intézmények) (pašvaldības aentūra) local public companies 6,948 budgetary organisations (príspevkové organizácie) 60 local public companies LPCS 3,378 church councils (fabriques inter-municipal structures (among Local government satellites: COMPANIES revenue) 314 aziende speciali e consortili vizços municipalizados) organismos autonomos administra- deverbände) d'églises) (offentige-private selskaber) 648 municipal internal bodies which Zweckverbände) 1,116 local public companies joint committees local public companies 13 cooperative associations joint authorities budgetary organisations asutus) local public companies local public institutions (iestāde) (komunalny zakład budżetowy) 559 budgetary organisations 149 local public companies 944 local public companies 1,198 local public companies (Sem) local public companies local public companies 296 gestioni in economia 76 local public companies tivos and comerciales 1,750 local public companies 339 local public companies foundations (sihtasutus – SA) 669 local public companies 2,415 local public companies (rozpočtové organizácie) 243 local public companies 114 enti autonomi e pubblici 770 local public companies 185 local public companies (Eigengesellschaft, Beteiligungsgesellschaft) (empresas municipais e intermunicipais) (among which 1,669 Kommunala bolag) (regulated and non-regulated companies) 224 local public companies 239 local public companies (intercommunales) 649 local public companies (sociedades mercantiles) 1,450 LPCs and similar 243 LPCs (intercommunales) 224 LPCs 944 LPCs 1,198 LPCs (Sem) 3,500 LPCs and similar 1,116 LPCs 963 LPCs and similar (consorzi, 76 LPCs (empresas municipais e 770 LPCs (sociedades mercantiles) 1,750 LPCs 185 LPCs (regulated and 224 LPCs 669 LPCs 2,415 LPCs 239 LPCs 60 LPCs 11,600 identified 339 LPCs LPC (kommunale Unternehmen), Results: 1.9 billion € (offentige-private selskaber) Turnover: 2.1 billion € Turnover: 13.3 billion € (kommunale Unternehmen) Turnover: 447.6 million € SpA, SrL) among wich 649 LPCs intermunicipais) Turnover: 16 billion € non-regulated companies) Turnover: 150 million € Turnover: 718 million € Turnover*: 5.2 billion € 4,000 identified LPCs and similar LPCs LPC KEY € among which 149 LPCs Staff: 27,250 employees Staff: 66,426 employees Turnover: 82 billion € Staff: 27,500 employees (S.p.A., S.r.l.) Staff: 55,000 employees Staff: 10,900 employees Staff: 53,142 employees Staff*: 160,402 employees AND SIMILAR 130 billion na na na na 6 billion € turnover Staff: 44,000 employees Staff: 530,000 employees Turnover: 16.7 billion € FIGURES turnover (*LPCs with more than 9 employees) 225,000 employees KEY FIGURES 900,000 employees Staff: 152,662 employes First creations of local government First creations at the end of the First creations in 1980 First creations at the end of the First creations in 1920 First transformation of local govern- First creations in 1857, confirmed by First creation of local government LPCs existing since 10 years First creations in 1900 First creations in 1870 At the beginning of the 1990's, From 1990 on, municipal enterpri- Between 1989 and 1991, transfer Early 1990s, creation of local From 1995 on, creation of In 1990, creation of municipal entre- Since the 1991 Municipal Since 1993, transfer of State – early 1990's: related entities in 1900, transformed XIXth century, recognised by the XIXth century in the energy sector Increasing number in the 1980's, ment related entities into companies the 1954 Act related entities in 1905-1910, then Increasing number from 1980's on transfer of State-owned ses created by the transfer of State of State-owned enterprises to muni- government enterprises as a conse- municipal enterprises as a prises (przedsiębiorstwo komunalne) ownership Act, transfer of local ownership to municipalities and municipal 1921 Constitution organisations to the municipalities ownership to local governments cipalities and transformation of the quence of State ownership transfer consequence of transfer of State as a consequence
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Poland Europe UNITARY COUNTRY
    Poland EUROPe UNITARY COUNTRY Basic socio-economic indicators Income group - HIGH INCOME: OECD Local currency - Zloty (PLN) Population and geography Economic data AREA: 312 679 km2 GDP: 960.2 billion (current PPP international dollars) i.e. 24 952 dollars per inhabitant (2014) POPULATION: million inhabitants (2014), 38.484 REAL GDP GROWTH: 3.3% (2014 vs 2013) a decrease of 0.0% per year (2010-14) UNEMPLOYMENT RATE: 9% (2014) 2 DENSITY: 123 inhabitants/km FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT, NET INFLOWS (FDI): 17 275 (BoP, current USD millions, 2014) URBAN POPULATION: 60.6% of national population GROSS FIXED CAPITAL FORMATION (GFCF): 20% of GDP (2014) CAPITAL CITY: Warsaw (4.5% of national population) HUMAN DEVELOPMENT INDEX: 0.843 (very high), rank 36 Sources: OECD, Eurostat, World Bank, UNDP, ILO Territorial organisation and subnational government responsibilities MUNICIPAL LEVEL INTERMEDIATE LEVEL REGIONAL OR STATE LEVEL TOTAL NUMBER OF SNGs 2 478 380 16 2 874 municipalities counties regions (gmina) (powiat) (województwo) Average municipal size: 15 530 inhabitantS Main features of territorial organisation. Poland has a three-tier system of subnational government, enshrined in the Constitution ratified in 1997. The regional level (voivodeships) was created by the 1999 Local Government Organisation Act. The intermediate level is made up of counties which were abolished in 1975 and re-established in 1999. Among the counties, 314 are “rural counties” and 66 are urban municipalities with county status. Having more than 100 000 inhabitants, they exercise both municipal and county responsibilities. Municipalities, re-established in 1990, are divided into three categories: urban municipalities, rural municipalities and mixed municipalities.
    [Show full text]
  • Societies East European Politics &
    East European Politics & Societies http://eep.sagepub.com Leading the Way to Regionalization in Post-Communist Europe: An Examination of the Process and Outcomes of Regional Reform in Poland Jennifer A. Yoder East European Politics and Societies 2007; 21; 424 DOI: 10.1177/0888325407303786 The online version of this article can be found at: http://eep.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/21/3/424 Published by: http://www.sagepublications.com On behalf of: American Council of Learned Societies Additional services and information for East European Politics & Societies can be found at: Email Alerts: http://eep.sagepub.com/cgi/alerts Subscriptions: http://eep.sagepub.com/subscriptions Reprints: http://www.sagepub.com/journalsReprints.nav Permissions: http://www.sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav Citations http://eep.sagepub.com/cgi/content/refs/21/3/424 Downloaded from http://eep.sagepub.com at Glasgow University Library on January 9, 2009 Leading the Way to Regionalization in Post-Communist Europe: An Examination of the Process and Outcomes of Regional Reform in Poland Jennifer A. Yoder* This article examines Poland’s process of regionalization since the late 1990s. It identifies several factors that led Poland to introduce self-government at the regional level both earlier and to a greater extent than its neighbors in East Central Europe. The analysis then turns to the competences and financing of the Polish regions, or voivodeships. Although Poland has taken steps to decentralize, it remains a unitary state. Keywords: Poland; decentralization; regionalization; regions; self-government In 1998, the Poles elected members of new regional councils, fol- lowed by the Czechs in 2000, and the Slovaks in 2002.
    [Show full text]
  • Prezentacja Programu Powerpoint
    African swine fever in Poland – update General Veterinary Inspectorate 11 December 2018 Update on epizootic situation in pigs ASF outbreaks in pigs in 2018 1 January – 23 November 2018: 109 ASF outbreaks in pigs The last outbreak was confirmed on 19 September in backyard holding in the area listed in Part III of the Annex to CID 2014/709/EU In total 213 outbreaks since the first one in 2014 Update on epizootic situation in wild boar ASF cases in wild boar in 2018 1 January – 10 December 2018: 2286 ASF cases in wild boar In total 3190 cases since the first one on 17 February 2014 (10 December 2018) The cases of the ASF, there were confirmed in Part 1 or in Part 2 near the border with Part I of the Annex of CID 2014/709/UE, last amendment CID 2018/1856 3143 case of ASF (2018/2239) 1 shot wild boar (female, 1 y.o.) confirmed on 30.11.18. (part 1, Lubelskie Region) The results from NVRI: RT-PCR- /Elisa+, IPT+. The distance from nearest case of ASF- app.19 km. (2542 case of ASF - 1 dead wild boar, confirmed on 17.07.2018; RT-PCR+) The proposal of changes of the Annex to CID 2014/709 Enlargement of part 2: - municipality Werbkowice in hrubieszowski district - municipality Tyszowce and - part of municipality of Łaszczów North from the road no. 852 in tomaszowski district. Enlargement of Part 1: - municipality Rachanie in tomaszowski district. 3170 case of ASF (2018/2266) 1 shot wild boar (female, 2 y.o.) confirmed on 05.12.18 (Warmińsko – Mazurskie Region, part 1) The results from NVRI: RT-PCR+ The distance from nearest case of ASF –app.14 km.
    [Show full text]
  • Health Profile Poland
    State of Health in the EU Poland Country Health Profile 2017 European on Health Systems and Policies a partnership hosted by WHO b . Health in Poland The Country Health Profile series Contents The State of Health in the EU profiles provide a concise and 1 • HIGHLIGHTS 1 policy-relevant overview of health and health systems in the EU 2 • HEALTH IN POLAND 2 Member States, emphasising the particular characteristics and 3 • RISK FACTORS 5 challenges in each country. They are designed to support the efforts of Member States in their evidence-based policy making. 4 • THE HEALTH SYSTEM 6 5 • PERFORMANCE OF THE HEALTH SYSTEM 9 The Country Health Profiles are the joint work of the OECD and 5.1 Effectiveness 9 the European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies, in 5.2 Accessibility 11 cooperation with the European Commission. The team is grateful for the valuable comments and suggestions provided by Member 5.3 Resilience 14 States and the Health Systems and Policy Monitor network. 6 • KEY FINDINGS 16 Data and information sources The data and information in these Country Health Profiles are The calculated EU averages are weighted averages of the based mainly on national official statistics provided to Eurostat 28 Member States unless otherwise noted. and the OECD, which were validated in June 2017 to ensure the highest standards of data comparability. The sources and To download the Excel spreadsheet matching all the methods underlying these data are available in the Eurostat tables and graphs in this profile, just type the following Database and the OECD health database.
    [Show full text]
  • Country Compendium
    Country Compendium A companion to the English Style Guide July 2021 Translation © European Union, 2011, 2021. The reproduction and reuse of this document is authorised, provided the sources and authors are acknowledged and the original meaning or message of the texts are not distorted. The right holders and authors shall not be liable for any consequences stemming from the reuse. CONTENTS Introduction ...............................................................................1 Austria ......................................................................................3 Geography ................................................................................................................... 3 Judicial bodies ............................................................................................................ 4 Legal instruments ........................................................................................................ 5 Government bodies and administrative divisions ....................................................... 6 Law gazettes, official gazettes and official journals ................................................... 6 Belgium .....................................................................................9 Geography ................................................................................................................... 9 Judicial bodies .......................................................................................................... 10 Legal instruments .....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Does the Type of Business Activity
    ECONOMETRICS. EKONOMETRIA Advances in Applied Data Analysis Year 2018, Vol. 22, No. 3 ISSN 1507-3866; e-ISSN 2449-9994 DOES THE TYPE OF BUSINESS ACTIVITY AND THE ENTERPRISE LOCATION AFFECT A FIRM’S SURVIVAL? RESULTS OF AN ANALYSIS FOR NATURAL PERSONS CONDUCTING ECONOMIC ACTIVITY IN THE ŁÓDZKIE VOIVODSHIP Artur Mikulec University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland e-mail: [email protected] ORCID: 0000-0001-8249-2296 Małgorzata Misztal University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland e-mail: [email protected] ORCID: 0000-0002-8719-2097 © 2018 Artur Mikulec, Małgorzata Misztal This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial- -NoDerivs license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/) DOI: 10.15611/eada.2018.3.02 JEL Classification: C10, C14, C41 Abstract: The article presents the results of the duration analysis for 21,163 enterprises (natural persons conducting economic activity) established in the Łódzkie Voivodship in 2010 and observed until December 31, 2015. The Kaplan-Meier estimation of the survival function, the Cox proportional- hazards model and the recursive partitioning method (the CTree algorithm) are applied to achieve the goal of the conducted research i.e. to answer the following question: does the type of business activity and location of the enterprise affect its duration? Prediction error curves based on the bootstrap cross- validation estimates of the prediction error are used to assess and compare predictions obtained from all three models. On the basis of the analysis results it can be assumed that the type of business activity makes firms more varied due to their duration compared to their location.
    [Show full text]
  • Poznań County Guidebook Original Title: Przewodnik Po Powiecie Poznańskim Prepared By: Ziemowit Maląg Editing: Andrzej Ogórkiewicz Photographs: Ziemowit Maląg
    Poznań County Guidebook Poznań 2015 ####################### Title: Poznań County Guidebook Original title: Przewodnik po powiecie poznańskim Prepared by: Ziemowit Maląg Editing: Andrzej Ogórkiewicz Photographs: Ziemowit Maląg Photographs on the cover: dykban.pl Powiat Poznański ul. Jackowskiego 18 60-509 Poznań www.powiat.poznan.pl ISBN: 978-83-88993-13-8 Printing: Zakład Poligraficzny Tomasz Kędziora, Murowana Goślina 2015 2 ####################### POZNAŃ COUNTY GUIDEBOOK Poznań County is one of the biggest counties in Poland. It includes seventeen communities around the city of Poznań, which does not make the County itself. These 17 communities witnessed and still witness important and fas- cinating events depicted in the architecture or remnants presenting the living history of the region. The area is rich in unique landscapes, forests and numerous lakes. Nu- merous hiking trails suit walking, biking or car trips. They are good for short walks or weekend excursions, but also for big planned escapades and holidays. Presenting the Guidebook, we invite all sportsmen, tourists, recreation enthusiasts to visit Poznań County! Jan Grabkowski POZNAŃ STAROSTE 3 ####################### Walking Walking, roaming or gadabout. This is the kind of tourism we have known for years. All you need are good shoes and reasonable physical fit- ness. And of course, the strive to see interesting natural and tourist sites. These routes will let you do just that. Recently, the increasing popular- ity of walking with poles allows for combining recreation, or even sport, with tourism. Poznań County routes enable both ordinary and Nordic Walking. Several well designed routes are set near the Wielkopolski Nation- al Park (WNP) (‘Wielkopolski Park Narodowy’). The 75 km red route from Osowa Góra to Puszczykowo, Rogalin, Kórnik and Zaniemyśl, sit- uated beyond the Poznań County, is the longest.
    [Show full text]
  • Uclg Country Profiles
    UCLG COUNTRY PROFILES Republic of Poland ( Rzeczpospolita Polska) Capital: Warsaw Inhabitants: 38.500.696 (2007) Area: 312.679 km² 1. Introduction from different political group. The President of the Republic appoints the Prime Minister and the ministers; the Council of Ministers is answerable to the Sejm. After over 40-years of extremely centralised government during the communist period, the local government reform started in 1990 with the first fully democratic elections since before the Second World War to municipal (gmina) local governments taking place in May 1990. The second phase of decentralization Poland, with a population of 38.5 million reform took place in 1998 when two upper (2007) and area of 312,679 km², is the 8th tiers of elected self-governments were largest country in Europe (both in terms of created on a county (powiat) and regional area and population size). (województwo) level. The political system is defined by 1997 However, the gmina tier remains the only Constitution as a republic. The legislative one which is protected by the Polish power is vested in the Sejm (Diet – lower constitution, while the existence and shape chamber) and the Senate. The 460 of upper tiers is dependent on laws members of the Sejm are directly elected adopted by Parliament. The gmina is also according to a proportional system, the only tier enjoying a general whereas the 100 members of the Senate competence clause (although as many are directly elected according to a majority decisions of the Administrative Courts as system, both for a four year mandate. well as of the Constitutional Court suggest, the practical import of the clause is not The executive power is vested in the very significant, since it is often interpreted President of the Republic of Poland and the in a narrow way), while the ultra vires Council of Ministers.
    [Show full text]
  • Powiat Gmina Miejscowośd Liczba Ludności Węzeł WSS Kategoria
    Powiat Gmina Miejscowośd Liczba ludności Węzeł WSS Kategoria Inwestycje TP BSC_infrastrukturalne BSC_podstawowe BSC_NGA chodzieski Budzyo Brzekiniec 242 0 1b 0 B S B chodzieski Budzyo Budzyo 4 280 1 2b 1 S S B chodzieski Budzyo Bukowiec 359 0 1b 0 B S B chodzieski Budzyo Dziewoklucz 450 0 1a 0 B B B chodzieski Budzyo Grabówka 170 0 1b 0 B S B chodzieski Budzyo Kąkolewice 159 0 1b 0 B S B chodzieski Budzyo Niewiemko 42 0 1a 0 B B B chodzieski Budzyo Nowa Wieś Wyszyoska 102 0 1a 0 B B B chodzieski Budzyo Nowe Brzeźno 235 0 1b 0 B S B chodzieski Budzyo Ostrówki 257 0 1b 0 B S B chodzieski Budzyo Podstolice 304 0 1a 0 B B B chodzieski Budzyo Popielno 32 0 1a 0 B B B chodzieski Budzyo Prosna 406 0 1b 0 B S B chodzieski Budzyo Sokołowo Budzyoskie 503 1 1a 0 B B B chodzieski Budzyo Wyszynki 127 0 1b 0 B S B chodzieski Budzyo Wyszyny 783 1 2b 0 S S B chodzieski Chodzież Chodzież 19 604 1 7a 1 C C S chodzieski Chodzież Cisze 20 0 1a 0 B B B chodzieski Chodzież Ciszewo 5 0 1a 0 B B B chodzieski Chodzież Drzązgowo 4 0 1a 0 B B B chodzieski Chodzież Jacewko 2 0 1a 0 B B B chodzieski Chodzież Jacewo 0 0 1b 0 B S B chodzieski Chodzież Kamionka 71 0 1a 0 B B B chodzieski Chodzież Kierzkowice 42 0 1b 0 B S B chodzieski Chodzież Konstantynowo 116 0 1b 0 B S B chodzieski Chodzież Krystynka 47 0 1b 0 B S B chodzieski Chodzież Milcz 495 1 1b 0 B S B chodzieski Chodzież Mirowo 57 0 1a 0 B B B chodzieski Chodzież Nietuszkowo 354 0 2b 0 S S B chodzieski Chodzież Oleśnica 349 0 2b 0 S S B chodzieski Chodzież Pietronki 158 0 1b 0 B S B chodzieski Chodzież Podanin
    [Show full text]
  • Dissemination of Environmental Information and Its Effects
    DOI: 10.1515/nispa-2017-0010 Dissemination of Environmental Information and its Effects on Stakeholders’ Decision-Making: A Comparative Study between Swedish and Polish Municipalities Anna Cregård, Iwona Sobis Abstract According to Action Agenda 21, which was adopted at the Rio Conference in 1992, sustainable development is a major objective for local and global development. Eco- nomic growth, good living conditions, and protection of the earth’s natural environ- ment are important to all people in the world. Th is article focuses on one aspect of sustainable development, i.e. on environmental sustainability. Research shows that local government can take a leading position in protecting the natural environment and disseminating information on it among stakeholders. However, our knowledge about the dissemination of environmental information practices among stakehold- ers is limited. Th e purpose of this research is to fi ll a gap in current knowledge, to describe and compare the practical work with dissemination of such information among stakeholders in Swedish and Polish municipalities. Th e questions to be answered are: What environmental information is collected and produced by the local government ? At what stakeholders is such information targeted ? and What eff ects does it have on decision-making by stakeholders in the investigated municipalities ? Th e study is based on state regulations, the homepages of municipal offi ces, and policy documents, offi cial reports, and semi-structured interviews with key managers responsible for the protection of the natural environment in the studied municipalities. Data were collected from late 2015 to early 2017. Th is research indicates that dissemination of environmental information has a positive eff ect on the decision-making of internal stakeholders.
    [Show full text]
  • Toponymic Guidelines of Poland for Map Editors and Other Users
    E/CONF.94/CRP.7 23 May 2002 English only Eighth United Nations Conference on the Standardization of Geographical Names Berlin, 27 August-5 September 2002 Item 9 (e) of the provisional agenda* National standardization: toponymic guidelines for map editors and other editors Toponymic guidelines of Poland for map editors and other users Submitted by Poland** __________________ * E/CONF.94/1. ** Prepared by Izabella Krauze-Tomczyk, Head, Office of Geodesy and Cartography, Warsaw. 02-40647 (E) *0240647* E/CONF.94/CRP.7 “Toponymic Guidelines of Poland for Map Editors and Other Users” was published by the Head Office of Geodesy and Cartography and is its third edition. The changes introduced in the administrative division of the country led to the need to update the previous edition. The present publication takes the latest data in this field into account and is also a supplement and corrected version when compared with the 1999 edition. Among other features, the collection of entries in the glossary of terms and abbreviations has been substantially extended. The colour administrative map of Poland according to the state existing in 2002 is a supplement to the new version of “Toponymic Guidelines of Poland”. These guidelines containing the following: I. Language II. Geographical Names Standardization in Poland III. Sources IV. Glossary of Generic Terms and Country Names Appearing on Maps and in Map Legends V. List of Abbreviations on Maps VI. Administrative Division of the Republic of Poland 2 TOPONYMIC GUIDELINES OF POUND for Map Editors and Other Users GLOWNY URZAD GEODEZJI I KARTOGRAFII HEAD OFFICE OF GEODESY AND CARTOGRAPHY Warszawa 2002 TOPONYMIC GUIDELINES OF POLAND for Map Editors and Other Users Third Revised Edition GLOWNY URZAJ) GEODEZJII KARTOGRAFII HEAD OFFICE OF GEODESY AND CARTOGRAPHY Warszawa 2002 GLOWNY URZAJJ GEODEZJI I KARTOGRAFI1 Ul.
    [Show full text]
  • Investing in Urban Sustainable Development in Poland
    Investing in urban sustainable development in Poland Territorial diagnosis of competitiveness of urban areas in Poland Case study: Wielkopolska Michał Męczyński, Jędrzej Gadziński 19 Table of contents 1. Introduction 4 1.1. General objective of the study 4 1.2. Methodology 6 1.2.1. Quantitative research methods 8 1.2.2. Qualitative research methods – expert interviews 15 1.3. Review of the literature and statistical data 17 2. Demographic situation in Poland 19 2.1. Population number 19 2.2. Natural increase 21 2.3. Migration 26 2.3.1. Foreign migration after 1945 26 2.3.2. Foreign migration after 1989 29 2.3.3. Temporary foreign migration 34 2.4. Movement between urban-rural and urban-urban areas 43 2.5. Growth or decline scenarios for Poland and its urban areas 49 2.6. Scenarios derived from the observed trends 57 3. Territorial diagnostics – the competitiveness 63 of urban areas in Poland 3.1. Development path of urban areas in Poland 63 3.1.1. Development of the settlement system before World War II 63 3.1.2. Development of the settlement system after 1945 66 3.2. Evaluation of the competitiveness of Polish regions 70 3.2.1. Economic competitiveness 72 3.2.2. People – demographic and human resources 75 3.2.3. Society – social and political competitiveness 77 3.2.4. Place and environmental competitiveness 79 3.3. Development of urban metropolises in Poland 81 3.4. Growth and decline analysis 88 3.5. Supply and demand for urban assets and services 94 3.5.1.
    [Show full text]