Can Preliminary Evaluation Guide Implementation Effectiveness?

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Can Preliminary Evaluation Guide Implementation Effectiveness? UC Irvine UC Irvine Previously Published Works Title Governance issues in developing and implementing offsets for water management benefits: Can preliminary evaluation guide implementation effectiveness? Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/40k5w08m Journal WILEY INTERDISCIPLINARY REVIEWS-WATER, 2(2) ISSN 2049-1948 Authors Feldman, David L Sengupta, Ashmita Stuvick, Lindsey et al. Publication Date 2015 DOI 10.1002/wat2.1061 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California Focus Article Governance issues in developing and implementing offsets for water management benefits: Can preliminary evaluation guide implementation effectiveness? David L. Feldman,1∗ Ashmita Sengupta,2 Lindsey Stuvick,3 Eric Stein,2 Vin Pettigrove4 and Meenakshi Arora5 This article explores governance issues in developing innovative pollutant offset programs by focusing on a case study being piloted at the Gisborne Recycled Water Plant in Jackson Creek, a rural subcatchment of the Maribyrnong River north of Melbourne, Australia. The article offers preliminary lessons from the ongoing design and anticipated challenges facing this innovative program based on reflec- tions from the literature and project progress to-date. This case exemplifies a form of adaptive governance—an approach well suited to achieving broad sustainabil- ity objectives—and for which an early assessment is both appropriate and oppor- tune. Adaptive governance is characterized by governmental collaboration with civil society groups, social learning through public participation, and experimen- tation leading to more flexible policy outcomes. Early assessment affords the pos- sibility of midcourse corrections, drawing on experience acquired elsewhere. We contend that the approach being developed in Victoria through this pilot program has implications beyond the use of recycled wastewater for achieving various social objectives. It may also contribute to the development of an expansive water quality offset framework applicable to point source discharges, nonpoint source pollution, and sewerage overspills. Moreover, the approach can be applied to design of off- set systems elsewhere—with appropriate economic savings and effective applica- tion to multiple water quality challenges if potential problems are discerned early. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Howtocitethisarticle: WIREs Water 2015. doi: 10.1002/wat2.1061 INTRODUCTION ∗Correspondence to: [email protected] ater quality trading and offset programs are 1Planning, Policy and Design, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA Wpromising approaches to mitigate impacts of 2Southern California Coastal Water Research Project, Costa Mesa, pollutants in receiving water bodies. The underlying CA, USA concept is a credit-based system wherein a discharger 3Irvine Ranch Water District, Irvine, CA, USA earns ‘credit’ by measurably reducing a pollutant in 4 Aquatic Ecotoxicology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, discharged effluent. The credit can be traded with Victoria, Australia other dischargers, or applied toward another pollutant 5Infrastructure Engineering, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia by the same discharger. Trading schemes can range Conflict of interest: The authors have declared no conflicts of from multiparty trading markets1 to more holistic, interest for this article. The authors gratefully acknowledge financial multiobjective approaches having as their goal the support from the U.S. National Science Foundation Partnerships for International Research and Education (OISE-1243543). reduction of total pollutants at lower cost to society © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Focus Article wires.wiley.com/water coupled with the generation of other social benefits paper’s authors play various roles in establishing and (e.g., improved instream flow).2 implementing the offset scheme, including providing a The Jackson Creek Pilot Project in Victoria is detailed monitoring assessment to establish stressors intended to explore a trade-off among dissimilar pol- in Jackson Creek, and a preliminary rainfall-runoff lutants with different environmental impacts. The goal model to establish water quality and quantity impacts of this experiment is to develop a systematic approach under the current and future scenarios affecting land to measure net positive environmental benefits3 while use. Thus, by undertaking a proactive assessment also evaluating the effectiveness of a series of dis- effort, the investigators hope to incorporate social similar trade-offs revolving around the ‘triple bot- issues into the scheme deliberately. tom line’ (TBL)—a sustainable development principle Second, preference for an offset scheme is a pol- that aims to integrate social, economic, and environ- icy decision adopted by the principals—Victoria EPA mental objectives. In this experiment, offsets must be and Western Water—it was not chosen by the authors. cost effective and incorporate stakeholder and com- Thus, while our ultimate interest is in assessing the munity participation in the decision-making process program’s achievements—which will be done in a sec- to ensure that local values and interests inform final ond, later evaluation—at this point, we seek to iden- offset framework design.4,5 tify and anticipate potential challenges with the offset While water quality trading and offsets have scheme, as well as possible barriers to its acceptability existed for decades, and several agencies and other and collaborative success. In effect, such as assessment entities have provided financial and technical support can help to prescribe midcourse adjustments to better for their implementation,6 their practical success has hasten overall project effectiveness. thus far been limited.7 Among other reasons, tradi- This approach has a precedent. Past studies of tional water pollution governance systems limit the pollutant offset schemes, for example, have noted application and adoption of these schemes due to reg- the value in timing program evaluation to permit ulatory roadblocks or severe restrictions on offsets. a greater impact on design and to hasten relevant 11 We contend that adaptive governance, characterized adjustments early in the policy development cycle. by bottom-up, multi-actor collaboration, policy learn- We will conclude our preliminary assessment by ing mechanisms, and flexibility in managing resources describing the efficacy of such an offset scheme for under uncertain and dynamic social and environmen- balancing social values and environmental bene- tal conditions,8–10 can enhance their success. This is fits when both are measured on different scales, or because such schemes may better allow for integration when they prompt differing trade-offs in terms of of societal values in the offset development process as risk, gain, or desired outcome. While we can offer well as more effective elicitation of non-market con- only a progress report—since the scheme remains siderations in their design. Although Western Water, in early development—its value lies in reporting the principal entity responsible for the Jackson Creek possible impediments while they can be discerned Pilot project, has not explicitly embraced adaptive early enough to be managed, and so lessons can be governance in its offset program, the concept provides transferred elsewhere. a useful framework to assess challenges to the policy’s versatility, flexibility, and inclusiveness. JACKSON CREEK PILOT PROJECT The goal of this investigation is to use the Jack- son Creek pilot study to explore the role of adaptive Site governance in the early development of a water qual- Jackson Creek watershed is a rural subcatchment ity offset scheme—and its role in fostering publicly of the Maribyrnong River, northwest of Melbourne acceptable, ecologically sound outcomes. Western (Figure 1). The area currently supports low-density Water is exploring an offset scheme to trade point residential and agricultural land uses; however, Mel- source effluent discharge from the Gisborne Water bourne’s expanding Urban Growth Boundary has Recycling Plant (WRP) with diffuse pollution from placed significant population growth and develop- urban and agricultural discharge. The success of this ment pressures on the catchment. Regional planners approach, we believe, depends on both the technical project population in the upper catchment (e.g., robustness of the scheme and the adaptability of its Gisborne, New Gisborne) to double from a 2006 governance framework to changing regulatory pres- population of 6398 to 12,071 residents by 2021,11 sures, societal values, and environmental and climatic while the principal community in the lower portion conditions. of the watershed, Sunbury, will double from 36,789 Why conduct such an assessment now, in such to 73,462 residents between 2014 and 2036.12 an early phase? There are two reasons. First, the Melbourne’s regional transportation corridors will © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. WIREs Water Governance Issues in developing offsets for water management benefits Jackson creek and Mount macedon riddells creek catchments Riddells creek Riddells creek Rosslynne reservoir Gisborne Jackson creek Legend Jackson creek catchment Riddells creek catchment Towns Jackson creek and tributaries Sunbury Diggers rest 0 3 6 12 km FIGURE 1| Image of the Jackson Creek catchment area highlighting major population centers and geographic features. An inset of the greater Melbourne area provides a scalar reference for the catchment area image.
Recommended publications
  • Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Assessment
    Bulleen Precinct Plan Heritage Impact Assessment and Traditional Owner Engagement Sponsor: Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning (ABN: 90 719 052 204) Heritage Advisor: Jonathan Howell-Meurs Author: Brigid Hill, Melinda Albrecht, and Dr Josara de Lange Date of Completion: DRAFT 9 May 2019 www.alassoc.com.au Andrew Long + Associates Pty Ltd ACN 131 713 409 ABN 86 131 409 Photo caption (Cover plate): Yarra River, Banyule Flats, Viewbank, facing northeast (Hill 2019) Copyright © 2019 by Andrew Long and Associates Pty Ltd Bulleen Precinct Plan Aboriginal Heritage Impact Assessment and Traditional Owner Engagement Sponsor: Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning (ABN: 90 719 052 204) Heritage Advisors: Jonathan Howell-Meurs Authors: Brigid Hill, Melinda Albrecht, and Dr Josara de Lange Date of Completion: DRAFT 9 May 2019 Bulleen Precinct Plan – Aboriginal Heritage Impact Assessment ii Table of contents Table of contents ............................................................................................................................. iii Part 1 - Assessment .................................................................................................................................. 2 2. Introduction to the heritage impact assessment .................................................................................... 3 2.1 Purpose of the study ....................................................................................................................... 3 2.2 Access to Victorian Aboriginal Heritage
    [Show full text]
  • Victorian Water Quality Monitoring Annual Report: 2001
    Victorian Water Quality Monitoring Annual Report: 2001 Report prepared for Department of Sustainability and Environment By WATER ECOscience Pty Ltd WATER ECOscience Pty Ltd ACN 067 477 989 68 Ricketts Road Mt Waverley Victoria Australia 3149 Private Bag 1 Mt Waverley Victoria Australia 3149 telephone +61 3 9550 1000 facsimile +61 3 9543 7372 Report Number: 720/03 Project Number: 2900 MARCH 2003 “Victorian Water Quality Monitoring Annual Report: 2001” ISSN No: 1445-1646 VICTORIAN WATER QUALITY MONITORING ANNUAL REPORT: 2001 Table of Contents 1 INTRODUCTION...................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 WATER QUALITY LEGISLATION AND GUIDELINES............................................................................. 2 1.1.1 State Environment Protection Policies (SEPPs)...........................................................2 1.1.2 Water Quality Guidelines.............................................................................................4 1.1.3 Commonly Assessed Water Quality Parameters..........................................................4 1.2 CURRENT WATER QUALITY NETWORKS AND THEIR RESPECTIVE STATUS.......................................... 5 1.2.1 Victorian Water Quality Monitoring Network.................................................................5 Rivers and Streams Program ................................................................................................... 7 1.2.2 Environment Protection Authority Fixed Site Network
    [Show full text]
  • 1969 Annual Report of the Chief of Engineers on Civil Works Activities
    DEs -Nor CnUAJI N~eF ~)1A 1969 Annual Report of The Chief of Engineers on Civil Works Activities Department of the Army '.Corps of Engineers Volume H forL4 INDEX FISCAL YEAR 1969 PROPERTY o U. s. Agg I[RT4 INDEX The following abbreviations are used in the index: BERH Board of Engineers for Rivers and Harbors NPP Portland, Oreg., District CDC California Debris Commission NPS Seattle, Wash., District CERC Coastal Engineering Research Center NPW Walla Walla, Wash., District LMK Vicksburg, Miss., District ORD Ohio River Division LMM Memphis, Tenn., District ORH Huntington, W. Va., District LMN New Orleans, La., District ORL Louisville, Ky., District LMS St. Louis, Mo., District ORN Nashville, Tenn., District MR&T Mississippi River and Tributaries Project ORP Pittsburgh, Pa., District MRK Kansas City, Mo., District POD Pacific Ocean Division MRO Omaha, Nebr., District SAJ Jacksonville, Fla., District NAB Baltimore, Md., District SAM Mobile, Ala., District NAN New York, N.Y., District SAN Charleston, S.C., District NAO Norfolk, Va., District SAS Savannah, Ga., District NAP Philadelphia, Pa., District SAW Wilmington, N.C., District NCB Buffalo, N.Y., District SPK Sacramento, Calif., District NCC Chicago, Ill., District SPL Los Angeles, Calif., District NCE Detroit, Mich., District SPN San Francisco, Calif., District NCL U.S. Lake Survey SWA Albuquerque, N. Mex., District NCR Rock Island, Ill., District SWG Galveston, Tex., District NCS St. Paul, Minn., District SWL Little Rock, Ark., District NED New England Division SWT Tulsa, Okla., District NPA Alaska District A Algoma Harbor, Wis. (NCC) 908 Alhambra Creek, Calif. (SPN) 1057 Abbapoola Creek, S.C. (SAN) 287 Alhambra Wash, Calif.
    [Show full text]
  • The Wurundjeri Willam
    Cover illustration: Destruction of the Land The Red River Marlene Young-Scerri, Four different groups are depicted here Brabralung Dreaming with different markings. This land was once plentiful and well cared for by the After reading the brief you sent me I people and they had their own system was quite saddened to learn how the of burning off to encourage new growth land was abused and destroyed with no for the next season. thought given for future generations. Plant and animal life was lost for good Many of the plants have been destroyed and this drove the Aboriginal people to for good now, and the animals are not slaughter sheep to survive. living in the area any more except for perhaps some possums. This painting is of the Maribyrnong River, and the surrounding area. The red is Aboriginal people only hunted what they the blood that flowed in the river, while needed to eat, and the skins were used the colours on the outer side of the to make cloaks and to wrap babies. They riverbank are from the tanning process respected the animals, the land and the that polluted the river. The animal plant life, only taking what was needed, tracks are kangaroo, possum, emu and they always gave back to the land. and lizard, and there is also an eel trap. The Aboriginal people hunted all these animals for food and clothing. Possum Tracks Eel Trap Emu Tracks Lizard Tracks Camp Site Plants Maribrynong River Kangaroo Tracks Aboriginal Group 1 Aboriginal Group 2 Aboriginal Group 3 Aboriginal Group 4 Contents The Earliest Inhabitants of the City of Moonee Valley 2 Kinship Structure 4 Way of Life Pre-contact 6 Initial White Contact 10 Settler Impact 12 The Personalities 15 Historical Sites within the City 17 Bibliography 20 Acknowledgements 21 Warning: Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are warned that this publication contains names and/or images of people who are now deceased.
    [Show full text]
  • Victorian Statewide Summary
    Victorian Water Quality Monitoring Network Trend Analysis Victorian Statewide Summary Produced for the Department of Natural Resources and Environment by Sinclair Knight Merz Victorian Water Quality Monitoring Network Trend Analysis Victorian Statewide Summary Other reports in this series: Corangamite Catchment Management Authority Area East Gippsland Catchment Management Authority Area Glenelg Catchment Management Authority Area Goulburn Catchment Management Authority Area Mallee Catchment Management Authority Area North Central Catchment Management Authority Area North East Catchment Management Authority Area Port Phillip Catchment Management Authority Area West Gippsland Catchment Management Authority Area Wimmera Catchment Management Authority Area Prepared by W.E. Smith and R.J. Nathan Sinclair Knight Merz Executive Summary The Victorian Water Quality Monitoring Network (VWQMN) consists of around 280 stations located throughout Victoria. A range of water quality indicators are measured at these sites, and data has been measured for up to 25 years at approximately monthly intervals. While this data set represents a substantial body of information, to date there has been no systematic and consistent analysis of the data that provides an assessment of the temporal and spatial variation of the indicators. Such analysis can provide valuable information regarding the impacts of past management practices on catchment processes, the impact of land management practices and interventions, and the likely direction of future water quality changes. The scope of this report is to present a summary of the nature and significance of time trends in water quality data recorded at VWQMN sites across the whole of Victoria. Only stations with records greater than ten years were used, and the indicators considered were pH, turbidity, electrical conductivity (EC), total phosphorus and total nitrogen.
    [Show full text]
  • A Biography of George William Knight
    Of Railways, Wine and Flowers: A Biography of George William Knight Robyn Hunter Bachelor of Arts (La Trobe University), Graduate Diploma of Education (La Trobe University), Master of Education Studies (Federation University) This thesis is submitted in total fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Faculty of Education and the Arts Federation University P.O. Box 663 University Drive, Mount Helen Ballarat, Victoria, 3353, Australia Submitted for examination 1 May 2018 Abstract The title page photograph1 has been used for many decades as the quintessential representation of George William Knight (1832–1923), railway engineer, viticulturist, horticulturist and Bendigo Council’s building surveyor and city surveyor. He is cursorily remembered by railway, viticultural and horticultural historians and enthusiasts. However, he remained unknown by some of his descendants, including me. Yet, his contribution deserves to be recognised. Knight is representative of English, middle-class, liberal young men who flocked to Australia in the 1850s, but who did not obtain high political office or financial success. This study uses a biographical approach to explore his role in building Victoria. It examines his conflict with Bendigo councillors who could not abide his forthright stance or his refusal to acquiesce to their whims, a conflict that exploded into a vicious battle that Knight lost. Unshackled from council, he expended his huge intellectual and physical energy developing nurseries and vineyards. Yet, these battles with council are remembered, and Knight’s reputation has suffered because of them. This thesis examines misunderstandings surrounding class and reveals Knight to have been a member of the petty bourgeoisie—aspirational, yet understanding and empathetic towards working people.
    [Show full text]
  • Central Region
    Section 3 Central Region 55 3.1 Central Region overview ................................................................................................... 57 3.2 Yarra system ....................................................................................................................... 59 3.3 Tarago system .................................................................................................................... 65 3.4 Maribyrnong system .......................................................................................................... 70 3.5 Werribee system ................................................................................................................. 74 3.6 Moorabool system ............................................................................................................. 80 3.7 Barwon system .................................................................................................................. 85 3.7.1 Upper Barwon River .............................................................................................. 85 3.7.2 Lower Barwon wetlands ........................................................................................ 89 56 3.1 Central Region overview 3.1 Central Region overview There are six systems in the Central Region that can receive managed environmental flows: the Yarra and Tarago in the east and the Werribee, Maribyrnong, Moorabool and Barwon (upper Barwon River and lower Barwon wetlands) in the west. It is possible to move water between these systems
    [Show full text]
  • Salt Marsh Remnant (147 112) Are of Some Botanical Interest
    ... ,. \ ' r f I l ~- - ,,, . 4 t 1 1 1 1·~r111 11111111 ~~I t1l1111 ~11r111, 11~ 1r111 1,1r~ 111111111111111·11J111r1111111 3 101 0 00024448 5 Sites of Botanical Significance in the Western Region of Melbourne Keith McDougall 1987 ~... Prepared by: The Department of Geography, University of Melbourne Prepared for: Department of Conservation, Forests and Lands; Arthur Rylah Institute - Ecological Inventory and Evaluation Section This project was carried out with the support of the Department of Conservation, Forests and Lands, Victoria and the Melbourne Western Region Commission Incorporated. AU views expressed are those of the author and must not be taken as the official views of the Department of Conservation, Forests and Lands, or the Melbourne Western Region Commission Incorporated. Contents ABSTRACT 1 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 1 CHAPTER I Introduction Assessment of Significance 3 Survey Technique 3 How to Find Sites in the Report 3 Index of Sites by Municipality 4 Index of Sites by Significance 6 CHAPTER 2 The N4tural Features of the Region Introduction 9 Geology 9 Terrain 9 Climate 10 CHAPTER3 Vegetation of the Western Region of Melbourne Introduction 15 Plant Communities 15 Road and Rail Reserve Vegetation 20 Weeds 20 CHAPTER4 Sites of Botanical Significance Broadmeadows Mapsheet (B) 23 Maribyrnong Mapsheet (M) 24 Altona Bay Mapsheet (AB) 27 Sunshine Mapsheet (S) 29 Keilor Mapsheet (K) 49 Sydenham West Mapsheet (SW) 59 Truganina Mapsheet (T) 65 Werribee Mapsheet (W) 68 Manor Mapsheet (Ma) 70 Eynesbury Mapsheet (E) 73 Melton Mapsheet (Me) 78 Toolem Vale Mapsheet (TV) 84 Bullengarook Mapsheet (Bu) 89 Lerderderg Mapsheet (L) 91 Balliang Creek Mapsheet (BC) 97 You Yangs Mapsheet (YY) 101 Staughton Vale Mapsheet (SV) 104 I ngliston Mapsheet (1) 108 CHAPTERS References 112 APPENDIX 1 Presettlement Vegetation Map References 113 APPENDIX 2 Indigenous Species of the Western Melbourne Region 114 Abstract This study examines aspects of the natural vegeta­ scarps, which contained Stringybark Forests.
    [Show full text]
  • Classification Report June 2015 Sunbury Rings Cultural Landscape
    National Trust of Australia (Vic) Classification Report June 2015 Sunbury Rings Cultural Landscape Background The preparation of this classification makes particular reference to David Frankel, ‘Earth Rings at Sunbury, Victoria’, Archeol Oceania, 17, 1982, and the City of Hume: Heritage Study of the Former Shire of Bulla District, 1998 (David Moloney and Vicki Johnson), and the PSP1075 Lancefield Road Post-Contact Heritage Assessment, 2014 (Context). It should be noted that in the 1998 Moloney and Johnson study a substantially larger cultural landscape, that included Jacksons Creek south as well as north of Sunbury, was identified as being of national heritage significance. This classification only relates to the northern part of this landscape from Rupertswood in the south to Emu Bottom in the north. The classification work has also been informed by consultation with the Traditional Owners, the Wurundjeri Tribe Land and Compensation Cultural Heritage Council. A stakeholder facilitation day was convened by National Trust in March 2015 at Emu Bottom homestead attended by Wurundjeri elders and staff, together with Friends of Emu Bottom Wetlands, Hume City Council, Melbourne Water and the MPA. The draft classification document was subsequently referred to Wurundjeri for comment. It was confirmed 27 April 2015 that they support the NTAV classification. The Sunbury Rings Cultural Landscape contains a number of heritage elements that have discrete designations or registrations. The purpose of the classification is to recognise that the significance
    [Show full text]
  • Discover Sunbury
    Discover Sunbury. FIRST JOURNAL Sunbury’s Newest Living Destination Discover Sunbury. Welcome to the first issue of the Kingsfield Journal. These are your first steps towards a truly inspired lifestyle – where opportunities ARTIST IMPRESSION await and dreams become realised. COVER IMAGE Located 40 kilometres north-west of the Artist Impression. Kingsfield will Melbourne CBD and just a short trip from grow into a modern community. popular lifestyle destinations such as the CONTACT US Macedon Ranges, you will find Sunbury’s kingsfieldsunbury.com.au newest living destination. 0487 555 525 [email protected] LAND SALES OFFICE Welcome to Kingsfield, Sunbury. Visit our Land Sales Office Cnr Lancefield Rd and Gellies Rd, Sunbury VIC 3429 SOCIAL MEDIA 1 DISCOVER SUNBURY Let’s take a journey to learn the wonderful history of the region, explore the established convenience of Sunbury and experience the exciting Kingsfield vision, your new master planned community. 10 12 14 ~ Enjoy. KINGSFIELD VISION LIFESTYLE By the A fortunate Everything numbers. outlook. you need. 16 18 20 21 INTERVIEW COMMUTE EDUCATION SUSTAINABILITY Cafe owner, Always Focus on Discover Amanda. connected. learning. the future. 22 24 26 INTERVIEW HISTORY INTERVIEW Local fruitier, A colourful The Angus. history. Developer. 28 30 32 HISTORY INTERVIEW PLANNER Birth of Landscape Weekends the Ashes. Architect. at Kingsfield. 3 2 KINGSFIELDSUNBURY.COM.AU KINGSFIELDSUNBURY.COM.AU VISIT US Experience Kingsfield. MOREMAC PROPERTY GROUP IS A RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT SPECIALIST. THROUGH OUR DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES WE CREATE ... INSPIRING PLACES. Our communities are the product of our passion for and commitment to the creation of places that people will be proud to call home .
    [Show full text]
  • Parliamentary Inquiry Into Environmental Infrastructure for Growing Populations
    Level 3, 60 Leicester St Carlton Victoria 3053 Phone 03 9347 5188 [email protected] www.vnpa.org.au ABN 34 217 717 593 Parliamentary inquiry into environmental infrastructure for growing populations Submission by the Victorian National Parks Association 28/09/2020 Thank you for inviting submissions to this inquiry into the current and future arrangements to secure environmental infrastructure, particularly parks and open space, for a growing population in Melbourne and across regional centres. We hope that this inquiry will help to support better environmental urban planning and help to inform the improvement of the quality and accessibility of nature and open space for the health and enjoyment of all Victorians. Established in 1952, the VNPA is Victoria’s leading community based nature conservation organisation. We are an independent, non-profit, membership-based group, which exists to support better protection and management of Victoria’s biodiversity and natural heritage. We aim to achieve our vision by facilitating strategic campaigns and education programs, developing policies, undertaking hands-on conservation work, and by running bushwalking and outdoor activity programs which promote the care and enjoyment of Victoria’s natural environment. The following submission provides discussion and recommendations on 5 topics: 1. The importance of accessibility to nature and open space for urban populations 2. Enhancing Melbourne’s “Green Edge” 3. Planning, creating and enhancing urban nature space networks 4. Management and funding for national parks, metropolitan parks and natural areas 5. Blue Infrastructure – “Blue Wedges” and coasts Contact: Matt Ruchel Executive Director Victorian National Parks Association 1. The importance of accessibility to nature and open space for urban populations It is well known that spending time in nature is good for one’s physical and mental health, and this underpins Parks Victoria’s “healthy parks, healthy people” motto.
    [Show full text]
  • Bulla Bypass and Melbourne Airport Link to Outer Metropolitan Ring: Historical Archaeology Survey
    Bulla Bypass and Melbourne Airport Link to Outer Metropolitan Ring: Historical Archaeology Survey Heritage Victoria project number 4036 William Anderson, Vincent Clark, Annie Noble March 2013 2 Bulla Bypass and Melbourne Airport Link to Outer Metropolitan Ring Historical Archaeology Survey Heritage Victoria project number 4036 William Anderson, Vincent Clark, Annie Noble March 2013 11 / 240 Sydney Road, Coburg, Victoria 3058 207 Ashbourne Road, Woodend, Victoria 3442 4 Summary In advance of the planned construction of a road link between Melbourne Airport and the Outer Metropolitan Ring and a bypass of Bulla, Dr Vincent Clark & Associates was commissioned by VicRoads to undertake cultural heritage assessments, to comply with the Aboriginal Heritage Act 2006 and the Heritage Act 1995. This report contains the results of a ground survey undertaken in November and December 2011 as they relate to historical- period archaeology (a separate report is being prepared that deals with Aboriginal archaeology as part of a ‘cultural heritage management plan’ – Anderson: in prep.). A notice of intention to conduct an archaeological survey was submitted to Heritage Victoria on 4 November 2011, in accordance with s.131(1)(a) of the Heritage Act 1995, and Heritage Victoria replied on 8 November 2011, providing the project number 4036 (see Appendix 1). The study area is located between the upper Maribyrnong River valley and the upper reaches of Moonee Ponds Creek, between 19 km and 27 km northwest of Melbourne city centre, within Hume City Council local government area and the localities of Melbourne Airport, Greenvale, Oaklands Junction and Bulla. The area consists of an irregular shape that spans 561.2 hectares.
    [Show full text]