January 29, 2006 Marco Boyce Morris & Ritchie Associates, Inc. 18

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

January 29, 2006 Marco Boyce Morris & Ritchie Associates, Inc. 18 January 29, 2006 Marco Boyce Morris & Ritchie Associates, Inc. 18 Boulden Circle, Ste 36 Wilmington, DE 19720 RE: PLUS review – PLUS 2006-12-05; Steeplechase and Reserve at Steeplechase Dear Mr. Boyce: Thank you for meeting with State agency planners on January 3, 2006 to discuss the proposed plans for the Steeplechase and the Reserve at Steeplechase project to be located 1400 feet east of the intersection of Barrett’s Chapel and McGinnis Pond Road, north of Frederica. According to the information received, you are seeking site plan approval for 543 residential units on 177 acres. We have reviewed a similar project on the same parcel. It was known to us as "The Blessing Property" as PLUS 2006-01-02 on January 25, 2006. The developer was the same in both cases. The Blessing Property proposal contained 458 residential units, both single family detached and townhouses. This PLUS review supersedes our previous comments found in our letter dated February 15, 2006. Please note that changes to the plan, other than those suggested in this letter, could result in additional comments from the State. Additionally, these comments reflect only issues that are the responsibility of the agencies represented at the meeting. The developers will also need to comply with any Federal, State and local regulations regarding this property. We also note that as Kent County is the governing authority over this land, the developers will need to comply with any and all regulations/restrictions set forth by the County. PLUS 2006-12-05 Page 2 of 24 Executive Summary The following section includes some site specific highlights from the agency comments found in this letter. This summary is provided for your convenience and reference. The full text of this letter represents the official state response to this project. Our office notes that the applicants are responsible for reading and responding to this letter and all comments contained within it in their entirety. State Strategies/Project Location This project is located in Investment Level 3 according to the Strategies for State Policies and Spending. This site is also located in the Kent County Growth Zone. Investment Level 3 reflects areas where growth is anticipated by local, county, and state plans in the longer term future, or areas that may have environmental or other constraints to development. State investments will support growth in these areas, but please be advised that the State may have other priorities in the near term future. Street Design and Transportation DelDOT anticipates asking the developer to contribute to one significant road improvement project in the area: the Little Heaven Interchange Barratts Chapel Road is classified as a major collector road. DelDOT’s policy is to require dedication of sufficient land to provide a minimum right-of-way width of 40 feet from the centerline on collector roads. Therefore we will require right- of-way dedication along the frontage to provide any additional width needed from this project. This is a change from our previous PLUS comments on this project resulting from the reclassification of the road. DelDOT will also require that a paved multi-modal path, located in a 15-foot wide permanent easement, be provided across the frontage of the site. DelDOT recommends that driveway easements be provided to allow or the future connection of the three outparcels on the north side of Barratts Chapel Road to the proposed subdivision streets. The right-of-way for the easterly entrance road should be 60 feet wide all the way to the southerly loop road. PLUS 2006-12-05 Page 3 of 24 Several reduced right-of-way streets are proposed in the townhouse section. They appear to be alleys, and as such they would not qualify for State maintenance. If they are to be built for State maintenance, the radii of several horizontal curves will need to be increased to meet DelDOT standards. Natural and Cultural Resources The Division of Historical and Cultural Affairs would like the opportunity to examine the area prior to any ground-disturbing activities, to learn something about the known archaeological site’s nature and extent and to see if there are in fact any other archaeological sites on the parcel and to learn something about their location, nature, and extent. They would also like the opportunity to document the existing house prior to any demolition activities. Wetlands provide water quality benefits, attenuate flooding and provide important habitat for plants and wildlife. Particularly because of this area and its status as a State Resource Area, lots should be removed in their entirety from both the wetland and the forest surrounding it. Vegetated buffers of no less than 100 feet should be employed from the edge of the wetland complex. Large isolated pockets of open space are rarely used by residents. Eliminating these pockets will be beneficial to onsite natural resources by relocating open space areas adjacent to wetland and forest resources. To maximize the existing buffering capacity and wildlife habitat on site, it is recommended that lot lines and other infrastructure (such as storm water management ponds) be pulled out of the forest and that areas of community open space be designated along the forested/riparian areas. DNREC has records of Notropis chalybaeus (iron color shiner) within Pratt Branch at this site, which is also a State Natural Area. There are also records of rare plants just upstream and they may be within the project site as well. There are freshwater tidal scrub-shrub wetlands bordering the stream and this type of habitat is very significant as it is becoming quite rare in Delaware. The current site plan does not provide adequate buffers to protect water quality, rare species and the integrity of this freshwater wetland system. The site plan/application states that a 100-foot buffer from the center of the stream will be maintained; however, 100 feet from the center of the stream only extends to the crest of the slope. The lot lines extend to the crest of the slope. The 100-foot buffer should extend from the crest of the slope to the lot line, not the center of the stream to the crest of the slope as it is currently. In addition, the PLUS 2006-12-05 Page 4 of 24 proposed 50-foot tidal and 25-foot non-tidal wetland buffers are extremely inadequate and should be increased to 100 feet. Due to the importance of the forest on this parcel as a riparian and wetland buffer, a greater effort to maintain the existing forest should be made. Omitting some of the lots and infrastructure, especially in the southern part of the plan, would allow for greater forest preservation. Current site plans indicate that roughly 19 lots are within the existing Natural Area. The Office of Nature Preserves strongly recommends removal of lots in the forested portion of the site and respectfully requests the applicant consider dedicating the Natural Area as a Nature Preserve through a conservation easement or donation of land to the State. The following are a complete list of comments received by State agencies: Office of State Planning Coordination – Contact: David Edgell 739-3090 This project is located in Investment Level 3 according to the Strategies for State Policies and Spending. This site is also located in the Kent County Growth Zone. Investment Level 3 reflects areas where growth is anticipated by local, county, and state plans in the longer term future, or areas that may have environmental or other constraints to development. State investments will support growth in these areas, but please be advised that the State may have other priorities in the near term future. We encourage you to design the site with respect for the environmental features which are present. Please pay particular attention to the environmental design comments found later in this letter. Our office is encouraged that the developer is taking advantage of the Kent County Transfer of Development Rights (TDR) ordinance. We support equity transfer programs such as TDRs which preserve land in our rural areas while concentrating growth in designated growth zones where infrastructure and services will be available to new residents. In addition, Kent County’s ordinance contains high standards for subdivision design and architecture in TDR developments, which will assure that the development is unique, attractive, and of a high quality. Our office has no objections to the development of this parcel in accordance with all relevant Kent County codes and ordinances. As discussed at the PLUS meeting, we encourage the applicant to take advantage of the flexibility in the Kent County TDR ordinance to preserve additional open space and natural features on the site. On way to do this is to implement “big house” style condo units in place of some of the other unit types. These structures can be designed with the same mass and detailing as large single family homes, yet typically contain two or more PLUS 2006-12-05 Page 5 of 24 condo units. The same unit count desired by the developer can be maintained with a smaller footprint on the site, allowing for more open space, forest preservation, and natural buffers. These units would also diversify the housing offered in the project, and perhaps open a different market segment to the developer. Division of Historical and Cultural Affairs – Contact: Alice Guerrant 739-5685 This parcel contains a historic house (K-2747) and a prehistoric-period archaeological site (K-589). Both of these are within the south half of the development. Beers Atlas of 1868 shows the P. Grumell House within the north half and the R. Williams House within or very near the eastern edge of the north half.
Recommended publications
  • REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING SEPTEMBER 13, 2018 the Council Meeting Was Held at WILMAPCO, 850 Library Avenue, Suite 100, Newark, Delaware, on September 13, 2018
    REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING SEPTEMBER 13, 2018 The Council meeting was held at WILMAPCO, 850 Library Avenue, Suite 100, Newark, Delaware, on September 13, 2018. 1. CALL TO ORDER: Mr. John Sisson, Council Chair, opened the meeting at 6:35 p.m. 2. ROLL CALL: Members present: David Edgell, representing Connie Holland, Delaware Governor’s Appointee Gwinneth Kaminsky, representing Herb Inden, representing City of Wilmington Mayor, Michael S. Purzycki Heather Murphy, Maryland Governor’s Appointee Antoni Sekowski, representing Rich Hall, representing New Castle County Executive, Matthew Meyer Eric Sennstrom, representing Cecil County Executive, Alan McCarthy John Sisson, Delaware Transit Corporation Chief Executive Officer Michael Spencer, representing New Castle County Municipalities Joshua Thomas, representing Drew Boyce, representing Jennifer L. Cohan, DelDOT Secretary of Transportation Members absent: Mayor Robert Alt, representing Cecil County Municipalities Guests, Observers: None. Staff members: Dan Blevins, Principal Planner Janet Butler, Administrative Assistant Heather Dunigan, Principal Planner Sharen T. Elcock, Executive Assistant Dave Gula, Principal Planner Randi Novakoff, Outreach Manager Bill Swiatek, Principal Planner Jacob Thompson, Transportation Planner Tigist Zegeye, Executive Director Minutes prepared by Janet Butler 3. MINUTES: The July 12, 2018 meeting minutes were approved with a correction in the Council Member’s Reports, Mr. Hall said “decrease” not “increase” parking. ACTION: On motion by Mr. Sennstrom seconded by Mr. Spencer the Council approved the July 12, 2018 Council Meeting Minutes, with correction. Motion passed. (9-13-18–01) 1 PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD: None. COUNCIL MEMBERS’ AND DIRECTOR’S REPORT: 4. Chairperson’s Report: Mr. Sisson said DART December Service Changes public sessions will be held on Tuesday, September 18, 2018, from 11:00 a.m.
    [Show full text]
  • Walk It – Bike It – Share It
    CITY OF MILFORD WALK IT – BIKE IT – SHARE IT Bicycle & Pedestrian Master Plan | Gary Norris, AICP Table of Contents Needs ..................................................................................................... 26 I. INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE .......................................................... 3 Typical Facilities .................................................................................... 27 The Importance of Walking and Bicycling .......................................... 3 Pedestrian Goals and Objectives ........................................................ 28 II. EXISTING CONDITIONS....................................................................... 5 Bicycles .................................................................................................. 30 Existing Bicycle Facilities ....................................................................... 5 Goal ................................................................................. 30 Purpose .................................................................................................... 5 Objectives for Le Tour Bicyclists .......................................... 30 Content .................................................................................................... 5 Objectives for Spare Tire Bicyclists ...................................... 30 Bicycle Level of Service ....................................................................... 13 Objectives for Kickstand Bicyclists ....................................... 31
    [Show full text]
  • Christiana Town Center 9 Urban Air Adventure Park 260 33,513 Situate In: White Clay Creek, New Castle County, Delaware
    DELAWARE TURNPIKE I95 FUTURE RELIEF ROUTE CONNECTOR DELAWARE ROUTECHRISTIANA 1 DELAWARE ROUTE 273 MALL EDGE RUN RD SITE CHRISTIANA FASHION CENTER STANTON CHRISTIANA ROAD BROWNS LN CHAPMAN RD UNIVERSITY W MAIN STREET DELAWARE TURNPIKE I95 LAWRENCEPLAZA DR DELAWARE ROUTE 273 DELAWARE ROUTE 1 CHRISTIANA RD 221 LOADING ROUTE 273 (VARYING WIDTH R/W) LOADING LOADING LOADING 11 RED ROBIN 129 7,000 S.F. ELEC./ 1 SPRINK. LOADING LOADING 200' 175' 4 200' 8B RESTORATION 2 3 5 6 7 8A HARDWARE OLD NAVY STAPLES BED BATH JOANN BOSCOV'S BUY BUY BABY 9 CLUB CHAMPION 250' 170 10A 10B 10C 130' 10D FIVE BELOW 27 2,747 S.F. 19,000 S.F. 20,000 S.F. & BEYOND 36,250 S.F. 189,292 S.F. 30,057 S.F. 2,141 S.F. URBAN AIR ADVENTURE PARK 100' OUTLET 25200 S.F. 10,000 S.F. 25,200 S.F. 12,000 S.F. 100' 280' 37,500 S.F. GOLF 33,513 S.F. 31,000 S.F. 8000 S.F. 5A 155' 95' 100' 133' 20' 27' 260' 133' 100' 144' 120' LOADING 150' 50' 175' 305' LOADING 28,000 S.F. 17 323 216 100 360 LOADING W MAIN STREET 280' 12 FAMOUS 238 444 DAVE'S 7,500 S.F. 100' DUMPSTER AREA LOADING LOADING 132' 15 150 70' 184 8000 S.F. 90' 16 190 8,100 S.F. 149 LOADING 100' 92 90' 14 FUTURE RELIEF ROUTE CONNECTOR 115 13 8,000 S.F. 80' BERTUCCI'S 5,800 S.F. W MAIN STREET STORE TENANT FRONTAGE AREA (SQ.FT)+/- RESTORATION HARDWARE 1 155 31,000 OUTLET 2 OLD NAVY 95 19,000 3 STAPLES 100 20,000 EXISTING SWMA 4 BED BATH & BEYOND 150 37,500 BROWNS LANE 5 JOANN 175 36,250 NEURYS LANE 5A FIVE BELOW 50 8,000 6 BOSCOV'S 305 189,292 NEURYS LANE 7 BUY BUY BABY 133 30,057 LEASING PLAN 8A AVAILABLE 20 2,141 FOR 8B CLUB CHAMPION GOLF 27 2,747 CHRISTIANA TOWN CENTER 9 URBAN AIR ADVENTURE PARK 260 33,513 SITUATE IN: WHITE CLAY CREEK, NEW CASTLE COUNTY, DELAWARE nd Ass LEGEND: s a oc n ia Karins and Associates 10A FUTURE EXPANSION 55,200 ri t a N e date s ENGINEERS ● PLANNERS ● SURVEYORS K W E 1/14/19 RESTAURANT E S NEWARK, DE & GEORGETOWN, DE s n r g 10B FUTURE EXPANSION o www.karinsengineering.com 105,230 i n y GROSS LEASABLE AREA: 554,742 S.F.
    [Show full text]
  • Garrett Woods TIS Review Letter
    Nicole Majeski secretary June 17, 2021 Mr. Michael Kaszyski Duffield Associates, Inc. 5400 Limestone Road Wilmington, DE 19808 Dear Mr. Kaszyski: The enclosed Traffic Impact Study (TIS) review letter for the proposed Garrett Woods (Tax Parcels 10-028.00-052 and 10.028.00-030) development has been completed under the responsible charge of a registered professional engineer whose firm is authorized to work in the State of Delaware. They have found the TIS to conform to DelDOT’s Development Coordination Manual and other accepted practices and procedures for such studies. DelDOT accepts this letter and concurs with the recommendations. If you have any questions concerning this letter or the enclosed review letter, please contact me at (302) 760-2124. Sincerely, Claudy Joinville Project Engineer CJ:km Enclosures cc with enclosures: Mr. David Cantera, Owner Trustee Mr. Larry Tarabicos, Tarabicos Grosso Mr. David Edgell, Office of State Planning Coordination Mr. George Haggerty, New Castle County Department of Land Use Mr. Owen Robatino, New Castle County Department of Land Use Mr. Mark Wolanski, New Castle County Department of Land Use Mr. Mir Wahed, Johnson, Mirmiran & Thompson, Inc. Ms. Joanne Arellano, Johnson, Mirmiran & Thompson, Inc. DelDOT Distribution DelDOT Distribution Brad Eaby, Deputy Attorney General Shanté Hastings, Deputy Secretary J. Marc Coté, Director, Planning Mark Luszcz, Deputy Director, DOTS Todd Sammons, Assistant Director, Development Coordination T.William Brockenbrough, Jr., County Coordinator, Development Coordination
    [Show full text]
  • Delaware State Police Museum
    Delaware State Police A Memorial Tribute To Those Who Have Made The Supreme Sacrifice Dedicated to the Deceased Men and Women of the Delaware State Police “Be tou faitfl unt deat and I wil give you a crown of life.” Revelatons 2:16 Into your hands Father of mercies, we commend our deceased Troopers in the sure and certain hope that together with all who have died in the Christ, they will be raised on the last day. We pray for the relatives and friends who have been left behind. As we close the book of life on our deceased Troopers, we open a new book, which says, “You never lose what you love if you love what you lose”. May they rest in peace, Oscar H Frundt Father Oscar H. Frundt Catholic Chaplain Delaware State Police Trooper’s Pledge Humbly recognizing te responsibilites entustd t me as a member of te Department of Stat Police, an organizaton dedicatd t te preservaton of propert and human life. I pledge myself t perform my dutes honestly and faitfly t te best of my abilit and witout fear, favor or prejudice. I shal aid tose in danger or distess, and shal stive always t make my Stat and County a safer place in which t live. I shal wage unceasing war against crime in al its forms, and shal consider no sacrifice to great in te performance of my dut. I shal obey te laws of te Unitd Stats of America…and te Stat of Delaware… and shal support and defend teir consttutons against al enemies whomsoever, foreign and domestc.
    [Show full text]
  • REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN 2030 Table of Contents INTRODUCTION and the PLANNING PROCESS
    WILMINGTON AREA PLANNING COUNCIL REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN - 2030 UPDATE- Providing Guidance and Direction for Transportation Planning in New Castle County, Delaware and Cecil County, Maryland Adopted March 22, 2007 WILMAPCO REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN 2030 Table of Contents INTRODUCTION AND THE PLANNING PROCESS ........................................................................ 5 WHO IS WILMAPCO? ............................................................................................................................................................ 5 WHAT IS A REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN ............................................................................................................... 5 THE PLANNING PROCESS ....................................................................................................................................................... 6 HOW DOES THE RTP RELATE TO STATE, COUNTY, AND MUNICIPAL PLANS? .......................................................... 6 SECTION 1: WHERE HAVE WE BEEN: BUILDING ON TEN YEARS OF PROCESS? .................. 7 TEN YEARS OF PLANNING AND POLICY ............................................................................................................................. 7 OUR CHANGING REGION....................................................................................................................................................... 8 ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT: ACCOMPLISHMENTS, 1996-2006......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Kent County Levy Court Follow the 2018 Comprehensive Plan and Deny the Rezoning Request
    Kent County Department of Planning Services Division of Planning SARAH E. KEIFER, AICP Phone: 302/744-2471 Director of Planning Services FAX: 302/736-2128 KRISTOPHER S. CONNELLY, AICP Assistant Director of Planning Services STAFF RECOMMENDATION REPORT October 1, 2020 Application / Ordinance : CZ-20-03 / LC20-09 Applicant / Owner : Ching, LLC c/o Steve Martin Present Comprehensive Plan Designation : Low Density Residential Proposed Comprehensive Plan Designation : Highway Commercial Present Zoning District : AR (Agricultural Residential) Proposed Zoning District : BG (General Business) Relation to Growth Zone : Inside Area and Location : Three contiguous parcels totaling 4.55 + acres located at the intersection of Bay Road (DE Rt. 1) and Old Cemetery Road (Co. Rd. 402), north of Milford Kent County Property Identification Numbers : MD-00-152.00-01-44.00 (1.89 + acres residential) MD-00-152.00-01-44.03 (1.0 + acre residential) MD-00-152.00-01-67.00 (1.66 + acres wooded) I. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Based on the information presented, the Kent County Code, and the 2018 Comprehensive Plan, Staff recommends DENIAL of the request to amend the Zoning Map and Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map. • The proposed rezoning is located on the west side of Route 1 between the Town of Frederica and the City of Milford. There is currently a substantial inventory of vacant commercial land in this corridor. Located directly across Route 1 from the subject site, there are 2.96 + acres of vacant commercial land. Between the subject site and the City of Milford, there are 11.96 + acres of vacant commercial land, of which 5.18 + acres are KENT COUNTY COMPLEX 555 Bay Road Dover, DE 19901 (Handicapped Accessible) Staff Recommendation Report CZ-20-03 Ching, LLC October 1, 2020 Page 2 of 7 located on the west side of Route 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Stratesies for State Policies and Spendins
    Srars op Dor,.lwlRe Expcurrvn DepnRrvtnNt On'n'rcn on Srlrn PuNNrNc CooRnrNtrroN November 27,2017 Mr. Gregg V. Moore, P.E. Becker Morgan Group 309 South Govemors Avenue Dover, DE 19904 RE: PLUS review 2017-10-02; R. & W. Cricket Medical Dear Gregg: Thank you for meeting with State agency planers on October 25,2017 to discuss the proposed plans for the R. & W. Cricket Medical project. According to the information received you are seeking review of a rezoning of 18.32 acres from AR-1 to CR-l along Rt. 9 in Sussex County. Please note that changes to the plan, other than those suggested in this letter, could result in additional comments from the State. Additionally, these comments reflect only issues that are the responsibility of the agencies represented at the meeting. The developers will also need to comply with any Federal, State, and local regulations regarding this property. \ile also note that as Sussex County is the governing authority over this land, the developers will need to comply with any and all regulations/restrictions set forth by the County. Stratesies for State Policies and Spendins This project is located in Investment Level 3 according to the Strategies for State Policies and Spending. Investment Level 3 reflects areas where growth is anticipated by local, county, and state plans in the longer term future, or areas that may have environmental or other constraints to development. State investments may support future growth in these areas, but please be advised that the State has other priorities for the near future.
    [Show full text]
  • PLUS Review – PLUS 2007-10-09; Deep Valley Farm Subdivison
    December 3, 2007 Mr. Mark Davidson Design Consultants Group, LLC 18072 Davidson Drive Milton, DE 19968 RE: PLUS review – PLUS 2007-10-09; Deep Valley Farm Subdivison Dear Mr. Davidson: Thank you for meeting with State agency planners on October 31, 2007 to discuss the proposed plans for the Deep Valley Farm Subdivision project to be located on the south side of Delaware Route 9, approximately ¼ mile west of Route 1. According to the information received, you are seeking site plan approval for 183 residential units on 86 acres. Please note that changes to the plan, other than those suggested in this letter, could result in additional comments from the State. Additionally, these comments reflect only issues that are the responsibility of the agencies represented at the meeting. The developers will also need to comply with any Federal, State and local regulations regarding this property. We also note that as Sussex County is the governing authority over this land, the developers will need to comply with any and all regulations/restrictions set forth by the County. Executive Summary The following section includes some site specific highlights from the agency comments found in this letter. This summary is provided for your convenience and reference. The full text of this letter represents the official state response to this project. Our office PLUS 2007-10-09 Page 2 of 22 notes that the applicants are responsible for reading and responding to this letter and all comments contained within it in their entirety. State Strategies/Project Location The State Office of Planning and Coordination recognizes that the proposed development is located within a Level 2 / Level 3 Investment area near the community of Lewes and is an area that we anticipate future growth.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 2 1 | P a G E Chapter II- the D/KC
    Chapter II- THE D/KC MPO STUDY AREA CHARACTERISTICS AND PROJECTED CONDITIONS General Area Characteristics The D/KC MPO metropolitan planning area consists of Kent County, Delaware (the County). As the middle of the three counties in the state of Delaware, the County is situated between New Castle County (more intensely developed) to the north and Sussex County (predominantly rural) to the south. Although the three counties have different land use and transportation planning challenges, they share the fact that the Delaware Department of Transportation (DelDOT) is responsible for 90% of all roads within the State (DelDOT Annual Report and Transportation Facts, 2018, pp. 4). In addition to different land use and transportation challenges, all three counties have a designated Urbanized Area associated with a metropolitan planning organization (MPO). The Dover, Delaware Urbanized Area (UA) (established after the 1990 US Census) is located in the middle of the County and extends (after the 2010 Census) just north into New Castle County. The small portion of the Dover, Delaware UA that extends into New Castle County is supported by WILMAPCO (the MPO responsible for New Castle County) through an agreement. This chapter will focus on different types of land use information that helps define the general characteristics in the County and that help establish a baseline when measuring projected conditions out to 2045. Data An essential aspect of the MTP planning process includes obtaining and analyzing data to assist in the development of MTPs and, specifically, in this instance, the Innovation 2045 MTP Update. A variety of data and planning studies were collected and reviewed from federal, state, regional, and local agencies to ensure the latest available information was used to update Innovation 2045 MTP.
    [Show full text]
  • Current Corridor Plans
    SECTION 4: CURRENT CORRIDOR PLANS SR1 SR 1 - Dover Air Force Base south to Nassau Timeframe: 1991 - 1998 4 Status: Plan Completed Strategy for Delaware Route 1 The plan for Delaware Route 1 is to convert the corridor to limited access over time. This will be accomplished by: • Purchasing property rights (access rights, development rights, fee simple) as new devel- opment is proposed (reactive approach). We are considering taking a more proactive approach to purchase of property rights in the future. This will involve the development of criteria to prioritize property acquisitions. • Coordinate new development with proposed improvements. • Prioritize capital projects (i.e. interchanges, service roads) identified in the com- pleted corridor plan. Develop a monitoring/triggering program to better define the appropriate timing to construct proposed improvements. • Interim improvements - Determine whether less expensive interim improvements may be made. • Design and build capital projects as needed. (See Section 2 for specifics in Communities, Developing Areas, Secondary Developing areas and Rural locations) 4 CURRENT CORRIDOR PLANS SR1 SR 1 Background The SR 1 corridor includes all property with frontage on SR1 or located within 500 feet of its centerline. The limits of the SR1 corridor are the Dover Air Force Base (DAFB) to the north, and the Nassau overpass near Lewes to the south. The corridor is approximately 46 miles long, and extends through Kent and Sussex Counties. SR 1 serves as the main north-south highway to access the Delaware beach resort area. Prior to completion of the ten projects listed below, in addition to resort traffic, eastern Sussex County had been experiencing a high rate of growth in year-round residential traffic and supporting commercial development.
    [Show full text]
  • Srlrp Or Dnuwnnn Exscurryn Deplnruonr Onnrco Or Sure Pr.Annrnc Coonornarron
    Srlrp or Dnuwnnn Exscurryn DeplnruoNr Onnrco or Sure Pr.aNNrNc CoonornarroN August 2I,2019 Mr. Ron Sutton Civil Engineering Associates 55 West Main Street Middletown, DE 19709 RE: PLUS review 2019-07-03; Millville by the Sea Master Plan Dear Mr. Sutton: Thank you for meeting with State agency planners on July 24,2019 to discuss the proposed plans for the Millville by the Sea Master Plan project. According to the information received you are seeking review of a master plan for a 686.8 acre to include 2,885 residential units and 67.7 acres of commercial area. Please note that changes to the plan, other than those suggested in this letter, could result in additional comments from the State. Additionally, these comments reflect only issues that are the responsibility of the agencies represented at the meeting. As discussed at the meeting the master plan areas will not need to go back through PLUS for each site developer, however it may need to be reviewed again if additional lands are added, major changes are made to the overall site plan, or uses of the areas are changed; i.e, residential to commercial or commercial to residential. Ifchanges are planned, the developer should contact this office to discuss. The developers will also need to comply with any Federal, State, and local regulations regarding this property. We also note that as The T own of Millville is the governing authority over this land, the developers will need to comply with any and all regulations/restrictions set forth by the town. Stratesies for State Policies and Snendins This project is located in Investment Levels 2 and 3 according to the Strategies for State Policies and Spending.
    [Show full text]