Kent County Levy Court Follow the 2018 Comprehensive Plan and Deny the Rezoning Request

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Kent County Levy Court Follow the 2018 Comprehensive Plan and Deny the Rezoning Request Kent County Department of Planning Services Division of Planning SARAH E. KEIFER, AICP Phone: 302/744-2471 Director of Planning Services FAX: 302/736-2128 KRISTOPHER S. CONNELLY, AICP Assistant Director of Planning Services STAFF RECOMMENDATION REPORT October 1, 2020 Application / Ordinance : CZ-20-03 / LC20-09 Applicant / Owner : Ching, LLC c/o Steve Martin Present Comprehensive Plan Designation : Low Density Residential Proposed Comprehensive Plan Designation : Highway Commercial Present Zoning District : AR (Agricultural Residential) Proposed Zoning District : BG (General Business) Relation to Growth Zone : Inside Area and Location : Three contiguous parcels totaling 4.55 + acres located at the intersection of Bay Road (DE Rt. 1) and Old Cemetery Road (Co. Rd. 402), north of Milford Kent County Property Identification Numbers : MD-00-152.00-01-44.00 (1.89 + acres residential) MD-00-152.00-01-44.03 (1.0 + acre residential) MD-00-152.00-01-67.00 (1.66 + acres wooded) I. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Based on the information presented, the Kent County Code, and the 2018 Comprehensive Plan, Staff recommends DENIAL of the request to amend the Zoning Map and Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map. • The proposed rezoning is located on the west side of Route 1 between the Town of Frederica and the City of Milford. There is currently a substantial inventory of vacant commercial land in this corridor. Located directly across Route 1 from the subject site, there are 2.96 + acres of vacant commercial land. Between the subject site and the City of Milford, there are 11.96 + acres of vacant commercial land, of which 5.18 + acres are KENT COUNTY COMPLEX 555 Bay Road Dover, DE 19901 (Handicapped Accessible) Staff Recommendation Report CZ-20-03 Ching, LLC October 1, 2020 Page 2 of 7 located on the west side of Route 1. Between the subject site and the Town of Frederica, there are 101.81 + acres of vacant commercial land, of which 63.25 + acres are located on the west side of Route 1. Given the amount of vacant commercial land along Route 1 between Frederica and Milford, there does not yet appear to be significant development pressures to warrant an additional 4.55 + acres of commercial zoning. Furthermore, there is existing commercial zoning in the Town of Frederica and the City of Milford. Both incorporated towns have existing infrastructure to successfully sustain commercial development. • As the need for nonresidential development increases, concentrated development around municipalities not only reduces pressure on rural areas in the County through the reduction of sprawl, but allows for growth opportunities for those municipalities. The Regional Planning Commission should consider the potential impact commercial uses in the proposed location would have on development patterns in the County. • The subject site is not located within the Master Plan area where transportation infrastructure, market demand for new commercial uses, and economic potential is preferable to this incremental rezoning request. • The proposed rezoning fails to meet all of the conditions of approval for reclassification under Section 205-408 of Kent County Code: A. There was a mistake in the Zoning Map, or the character of the neighborhood has changed to such an extent that the Zoning Map should be changed. There was no mistake in the Zoning Map. The surrounding area is primarily zoned AR and AC, with BG zoning along Route 1 and six parcels zoned IL or IG within a half mile of the subject site. The parcel directly to the north of this site is zoned BG, contains approximately 19.47 + acres, and remains undeveloped. In addition, there are two parcels totaling 2.96 + acres fronting Route 1 directly across from the subject site that are zoned BG and remain undeveloped. The character of the surrounding area is predominantly agricultural and low density residential with some small-scale businesses utilizing a portion of the existing inventory of commercial land along Route 1. The landscape and physical character of the area has not changed in use or character to such an extent to grant an additional 4.55 + acres of commercial zoning. B. The new zoning classification conforms to the Comprehensive Plan for Kent County in relation to land use, number of dwelling units or type and intensity of nonresidential buildings and location. The proposed BG zoning district does not conform to the 2018 Comprehensive Plan as the subject site is designated for low density residential uses (Map 7B). Further, the subject site is not designated as a Commercial Area (Map 2A), which focuses on locations best suited for future commercial uses based on existing infrastructure. Although there is some commercial zoning along this Route 1 Staff Recommendation Report CZ-20-03 Ching, LLC October 1, 2020 Page 3 of 7 corridor, it is predominantly vacant or being used residentially and the overall intensity of the area has remained unchanged. The proposed reclassification does not conform to Chapter 2 Economic Development or Chapter 7 Land Use of the Comprehensive Plan. The policy emphasis and recommendations of these chapters focus on the importance of development within incorporated areas as they already have the required infrastructure necessary to support economic development in the County. The specific policy emphasis and recommendations include: • Support the economic development efforts of municipalities including downtown revitalization efforts. • Focus economic development as a whole toward areas where infrastructure exists or is planned for the immediate future. • Create economic centers of business and commerce around existing infrastructure and identify areas designated for industrial and business parks, large scale commercial uses, and neighborhood commercial uses. • Preserve areas for economic development opportunities by focusing on growth in Employment Centers, Commercial Areas, and Industrial Areas. • Develop in areas with adequate infrastructure and public services while protecting the natural resources and rural character of the County. C. Transportation facilities, water and sewerage systems, storm drainage systems, schools and fire suppression facilities adequate to serve the proposed use are either in existence or programmed for construction. The subject site does not fall within the designated Master Plan area where transportation facilities, water and sewerage systems, storm drain systems, and fire suppression facilities are available or planned. The subject site is located along the Route 1 corridor between two major transportation infrastructure investments, the South Frederica and Thompsonville intersections. The site has frontage on Old Cemetery Road, which is a secondary road. In a letter dated August 16, 2019, DelDOT advised that Old Cemetery Road would have to be realigned and widened to accommodate the site’s proposed trip generation, which is part of the land development proposal that has not yet been submitted to Kent County Planning. Although this application is for rezoning and not land development, it is worth mentioning that acceleration and deceleration lanes on Route 1 leading to/from the realigned Old Cemetery Road would be required, and the existing Route 1 medians would require channelization and would be closed. In addition, as part of a transportation study currently being Staff Recommendation Report CZ-20-03 Ching, LLC October 1, 2020 Page 4 of 7 conducted in this area, there is potential that access to the subject site will eventually be from a contemplated service/access road, which would be set back an adequate distance from Route 1 to provide ample storage space for traffic queuing along Old Cemetery Road. Kent County Public Works has completed a feasibility study for the subject site. However, the applicant has not petitioned the Levy Court for inclusion in the Kent County Sanitary Sewer District, and the subject site currently does not have access to central water service. D. There is compatibility between the uses of the property as reclassified and the surrounding land uses, so as to promote the health, safety and welfare of present and future residents of the county. There is little compatibility between the uses of the property as reclassified as the subject site is located within a predominantly low-density area with agricultural and residential uses. The zoning map is misleading as it gives the impression that commercial zoning equates to commercial use. Although there are commercially zoned properties along Route 1 in the surrounding area, there is a substantial inventory of vacant and undeveloped commercial land in this vicinity, and the few commercial uses that do exist trend towards smaller businesses. The majority of new commercial development and infrastructure are located closer to the municipalities to the north and south. If reclassified to commercial and developed as such, there will be an impact to the rural character of the surrounding area that exists. II. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: • The applicant is requesting an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map to revise the area of petition (4.55 + acres) from low density residential to highway commercial and rezone from AR to BG. • The subject site is comprised of three contiguous parcels. Parcels 4400 and 4403 are currently being used residentially. Parcel 6700 is undeveloped and almost entirely covered in forested freshwater wetlands. In addition to wetlands, all three parcels are impacted by a blue line stream. Given the size of the parcels, the building setbacks, the environmental impacts from the wetlands and stream, and the buffers required to protect these areas, there is a limited building envelope for commercial development. • The Office of State Planning and Coordination reviewed the application through the PLUS process on June 24, 2020. Their review includes recommendations from state agencies, including DelDOT, DNREC, the State Historic Preservation Office, and the Department of Agriculture. The PLUS report indicates that this project is located in an Investment Level 3 area where growth is anticipated by local, county, and State plans in the longer term future, or areas that may have environmental or other constraints to development.
Recommended publications
  • REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING SEPTEMBER 13, 2018 the Council Meeting Was Held at WILMAPCO, 850 Library Avenue, Suite 100, Newark, Delaware, on September 13, 2018
    REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING SEPTEMBER 13, 2018 The Council meeting was held at WILMAPCO, 850 Library Avenue, Suite 100, Newark, Delaware, on September 13, 2018. 1. CALL TO ORDER: Mr. John Sisson, Council Chair, opened the meeting at 6:35 p.m. 2. ROLL CALL: Members present: David Edgell, representing Connie Holland, Delaware Governor’s Appointee Gwinneth Kaminsky, representing Herb Inden, representing City of Wilmington Mayor, Michael S. Purzycki Heather Murphy, Maryland Governor’s Appointee Antoni Sekowski, representing Rich Hall, representing New Castle County Executive, Matthew Meyer Eric Sennstrom, representing Cecil County Executive, Alan McCarthy John Sisson, Delaware Transit Corporation Chief Executive Officer Michael Spencer, representing New Castle County Municipalities Joshua Thomas, representing Drew Boyce, representing Jennifer L. Cohan, DelDOT Secretary of Transportation Members absent: Mayor Robert Alt, representing Cecil County Municipalities Guests, Observers: None. Staff members: Dan Blevins, Principal Planner Janet Butler, Administrative Assistant Heather Dunigan, Principal Planner Sharen T. Elcock, Executive Assistant Dave Gula, Principal Planner Randi Novakoff, Outreach Manager Bill Swiatek, Principal Planner Jacob Thompson, Transportation Planner Tigist Zegeye, Executive Director Minutes prepared by Janet Butler 3. MINUTES: The July 12, 2018 meeting minutes were approved with a correction in the Council Member’s Reports, Mr. Hall said “decrease” not “increase” parking. ACTION: On motion by Mr. Sennstrom seconded by Mr. Spencer the Council approved the July 12, 2018 Council Meeting Minutes, with correction. Motion passed. (9-13-18–01) 1 PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD: None. COUNCIL MEMBERS’ AND DIRECTOR’S REPORT: 4. Chairperson’s Report: Mr. Sisson said DART December Service Changes public sessions will be held on Tuesday, September 18, 2018, from 11:00 a.m.
    [Show full text]
  • Walk It – Bike It – Share It
    CITY OF MILFORD WALK IT – BIKE IT – SHARE IT Bicycle & Pedestrian Master Plan | Gary Norris, AICP Table of Contents Needs ..................................................................................................... 26 I. INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE .......................................................... 3 Typical Facilities .................................................................................... 27 The Importance of Walking and Bicycling .......................................... 3 Pedestrian Goals and Objectives ........................................................ 28 II. EXISTING CONDITIONS....................................................................... 5 Bicycles .................................................................................................. 30 Existing Bicycle Facilities ....................................................................... 5 Goal ................................................................................. 30 Purpose .................................................................................................... 5 Objectives for Le Tour Bicyclists .......................................... 30 Content .................................................................................................... 5 Objectives for Spare Tire Bicyclists ...................................... 30 Bicycle Level of Service ....................................................................... 13 Objectives for Kickstand Bicyclists ....................................... 31
    [Show full text]
  • Christiana Town Center 9 Urban Air Adventure Park 260 33,513 Situate In: White Clay Creek, New Castle County, Delaware
    DELAWARE TURNPIKE I95 FUTURE RELIEF ROUTE CONNECTOR DELAWARE ROUTECHRISTIANA 1 DELAWARE ROUTE 273 MALL EDGE RUN RD SITE CHRISTIANA FASHION CENTER STANTON CHRISTIANA ROAD BROWNS LN CHAPMAN RD UNIVERSITY W MAIN STREET DELAWARE TURNPIKE I95 LAWRENCEPLAZA DR DELAWARE ROUTE 273 DELAWARE ROUTE 1 CHRISTIANA RD 221 LOADING ROUTE 273 (VARYING WIDTH R/W) LOADING LOADING LOADING 11 RED ROBIN 129 7,000 S.F. ELEC./ 1 SPRINK. LOADING LOADING 200' 175' 4 200' 8B RESTORATION 2 3 5 6 7 8A HARDWARE OLD NAVY STAPLES BED BATH JOANN BOSCOV'S BUY BUY BABY 9 CLUB CHAMPION 250' 170 10A 10B 10C 130' 10D FIVE BELOW 27 2,747 S.F. 19,000 S.F. 20,000 S.F. & BEYOND 36,250 S.F. 189,292 S.F. 30,057 S.F. 2,141 S.F. URBAN AIR ADVENTURE PARK 100' OUTLET 25200 S.F. 10,000 S.F. 25,200 S.F. 12,000 S.F. 100' 280' 37,500 S.F. GOLF 33,513 S.F. 31,000 S.F. 8000 S.F. 5A 155' 95' 100' 133' 20' 27' 260' 133' 100' 144' 120' LOADING 150' 50' 175' 305' LOADING 28,000 S.F. 17 323 216 100 360 LOADING W MAIN STREET 280' 12 FAMOUS 238 444 DAVE'S 7,500 S.F. 100' DUMPSTER AREA LOADING LOADING 132' 15 150 70' 184 8000 S.F. 90' 16 190 8,100 S.F. 149 LOADING 100' 92 90' 14 FUTURE RELIEF ROUTE CONNECTOR 115 13 8,000 S.F. 80' BERTUCCI'S 5,800 S.F. W MAIN STREET STORE TENANT FRONTAGE AREA (SQ.FT)+/- RESTORATION HARDWARE 1 155 31,000 OUTLET 2 OLD NAVY 95 19,000 3 STAPLES 100 20,000 EXISTING SWMA 4 BED BATH & BEYOND 150 37,500 BROWNS LANE 5 JOANN 175 36,250 NEURYS LANE 5A FIVE BELOW 50 8,000 6 BOSCOV'S 305 189,292 NEURYS LANE 7 BUY BUY BABY 133 30,057 LEASING PLAN 8A AVAILABLE 20 2,141 FOR 8B CLUB CHAMPION GOLF 27 2,747 CHRISTIANA TOWN CENTER 9 URBAN AIR ADVENTURE PARK 260 33,513 SITUATE IN: WHITE CLAY CREEK, NEW CASTLE COUNTY, DELAWARE nd Ass LEGEND: s a oc n ia Karins and Associates 10A FUTURE EXPANSION 55,200 ri t a N e date s ENGINEERS ● PLANNERS ● SURVEYORS K W E 1/14/19 RESTAURANT E S NEWARK, DE & GEORGETOWN, DE s n r g 10B FUTURE EXPANSION o www.karinsengineering.com 105,230 i n y GROSS LEASABLE AREA: 554,742 S.F.
    [Show full text]
  • Garrett Woods TIS Review Letter
    Nicole Majeski secretary June 17, 2021 Mr. Michael Kaszyski Duffield Associates, Inc. 5400 Limestone Road Wilmington, DE 19808 Dear Mr. Kaszyski: The enclosed Traffic Impact Study (TIS) review letter for the proposed Garrett Woods (Tax Parcels 10-028.00-052 and 10.028.00-030) development has been completed under the responsible charge of a registered professional engineer whose firm is authorized to work in the State of Delaware. They have found the TIS to conform to DelDOT’s Development Coordination Manual and other accepted practices and procedures for such studies. DelDOT accepts this letter and concurs with the recommendations. If you have any questions concerning this letter or the enclosed review letter, please contact me at (302) 760-2124. Sincerely, Claudy Joinville Project Engineer CJ:km Enclosures cc with enclosures: Mr. David Cantera, Owner Trustee Mr. Larry Tarabicos, Tarabicos Grosso Mr. David Edgell, Office of State Planning Coordination Mr. George Haggerty, New Castle County Department of Land Use Mr. Owen Robatino, New Castle County Department of Land Use Mr. Mark Wolanski, New Castle County Department of Land Use Mr. Mir Wahed, Johnson, Mirmiran & Thompson, Inc. Ms. Joanne Arellano, Johnson, Mirmiran & Thompson, Inc. DelDOT Distribution DelDOT Distribution Brad Eaby, Deputy Attorney General Shanté Hastings, Deputy Secretary J. Marc Coté, Director, Planning Mark Luszcz, Deputy Director, DOTS Todd Sammons, Assistant Director, Development Coordination T.William Brockenbrough, Jr., County Coordinator, Development Coordination
    [Show full text]
  • Delaware State Police Museum
    Delaware State Police A Memorial Tribute To Those Who Have Made The Supreme Sacrifice Dedicated to the Deceased Men and Women of the Delaware State Police “Be tou faitfl unt deat and I wil give you a crown of life.” Revelatons 2:16 Into your hands Father of mercies, we commend our deceased Troopers in the sure and certain hope that together with all who have died in the Christ, they will be raised on the last day. We pray for the relatives and friends who have been left behind. As we close the book of life on our deceased Troopers, we open a new book, which says, “You never lose what you love if you love what you lose”. May they rest in peace, Oscar H Frundt Father Oscar H. Frundt Catholic Chaplain Delaware State Police Trooper’s Pledge Humbly recognizing te responsibilites entustd t me as a member of te Department of Stat Police, an organizaton dedicatd t te preservaton of propert and human life. I pledge myself t perform my dutes honestly and faitfly t te best of my abilit and witout fear, favor or prejudice. I shal aid tose in danger or distess, and shal stive always t make my Stat and County a safer place in which t live. I shal wage unceasing war against crime in al its forms, and shal consider no sacrifice to great in te performance of my dut. I shal obey te laws of te Unitd Stats of America…and te Stat of Delaware… and shal support and defend teir consttutons against al enemies whomsoever, foreign and domestc.
    [Show full text]
  • REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN 2030 Table of Contents INTRODUCTION and the PLANNING PROCESS
    WILMINGTON AREA PLANNING COUNCIL REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN - 2030 UPDATE- Providing Guidance and Direction for Transportation Planning in New Castle County, Delaware and Cecil County, Maryland Adopted March 22, 2007 WILMAPCO REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN 2030 Table of Contents INTRODUCTION AND THE PLANNING PROCESS ........................................................................ 5 WHO IS WILMAPCO? ............................................................................................................................................................ 5 WHAT IS A REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN ............................................................................................................... 5 THE PLANNING PROCESS ....................................................................................................................................................... 6 HOW DOES THE RTP RELATE TO STATE, COUNTY, AND MUNICIPAL PLANS? .......................................................... 6 SECTION 1: WHERE HAVE WE BEEN: BUILDING ON TEN YEARS OF PROCESS? .................. 7 TEN YEARS OF PLANNING AND POLICY ............................................................................................................................. 7 OUR CHANGING REGION....................................................................................................................................................... 8 ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT: ACCOMPLISHMENTS, 1996-2006......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Stratesies for State Policies and Spendins
    Srars op Dor,.lwlRe Expcurrvn DepnRrvtnNt On'n'rcn on Srlrn PuNNrNc CooRnrNtrroN November 27,2017 Mr. Gregg V. Moore, P.E. Becker Morgan Group 309 South Govemors Avenue Dover, DE 19904 RE: PLUS review 2017-10-02; R. & W. Cricket Medical Dear Gregg: Thank you for meeting with State agency planers on October 25,2017 to discuss the proposed plans for the R. & W. Cricket Medical project. According to the information received you are seeking review of a rezoning of 18.32 acres from AR-1 to CR-l along Rt. 9 in Sussex County. Please note that changes to the plan, other than those suggested in this letter, could result in additional comments from the State. Additionally, these comments reflect only issues that are the responsibility of the agencies represented at the meeting. The developers will also need to comply with any Federal, State, and local regulations regarding this property. \ile also note that as Sussex County is the governing authority over this land, the developers will need to comply with any and all regulations/restrictions set forth by the County. Stratesies for State Policies and Spendins This project is located in Investment Level 3 according to the Strategies for State Policies and Spending. Investment Level 3 reflects areas where growth is anticipated by local, county, and state plans in the longer term future, or areas that may have environmental or other constraints to development. State investments may support future growth in these areas, but please be advised that the State has other priorities for the near future.
    [Show full text]
  • January 29, 2006 Marco Boyce Morris & Ritchie Associates, Inc. 18
    January 29, 2006 Marco Boyce Morris & Ritchie Associates, Inc. 18 Boulden Circle, Ste 36 Wilmington, DE 19720 RE: PLUS review – PLUS 2006-12-05; Steeplechase and Reserve at Steeplechase Dear Mr. Boyce: Thank you for meeting with State agency planners on January 3, 2006 to discuss the proposed plans for the Steeplechase and the Reserve at Steeplechase project to be located 1400 feet east of the intersection of Barrett’s Chapel and McGinnis Pond Road, north of Frederica. According to the information received, you are seeking site plan approval for 543 residential units on 177 acres. We have reviewed a similar project on the same parcel. It was known to us as "The Blessing Property" as PLUS 2006-01-02 on January 25, 2006. The developer was the same in both cases. The Blessing Property proposal contained 458 residential units, both single family detached and townhouses. This PLUS review supersedes our previous comments found in our letter dated February 15, 2006. Please note that changes to the plan, other than those suggested in this letter, could result in additional comments from the State. Additionally, these comments reflect only issues that are the responsibility of the agencies represented at the meeting. The developers will also need to comply with any Federal, State and local regulations regarding this property. We also note that as Kent County is the governing authority over this land, the developers will need to comply with any and all regulations/restrictions set forth by the County. PLUS 2006-12-05 Page 2 of 24 Executive Summary The following section includes some site specific highlights from the agency comments found in this letter.
    [Show full text]
  • PLUS Review – PLUS 2007-10-09; Deep Valley Farm Subdivison
    December 3, 2007 Mr. Mark Davidson Design Consultants Group, LLC 18072 Davidson Drive Milton, DE 19968 RE: PLUS review – PLUS 2007-10-09; Deep Valley Farm Subdivison Dear Mr. Davidson: Thank you for meeting with State agency planners on October 31, 2007 to discuss the proposed plans for the Deep Valley Farm Subdivision project to be located on the south side of Delaware Route 9, approximately ¼ mile west of Route 1. According to the information received, you are seeking site plan approval for 183 residential units on 86 acres. Please note that changes to the plan, other than those suggested in this letter, could result in additional comments from the State. Additionally, these comments reflect only issues that are the responsibility of the agencies represented at the meeting. The developers will also need to comply with any Federal, State and local regulations regarding this property. We also note that as Sussex County is the governing authority over this land, the developers will need to comply with any and all regulations/restrictions set forth by the County. Executive Summary The following section includes some site specific highlights from the agency comments found in this letter. This summary is provided for your convenience and reference. The full text of this letter represents the official state response to this project. Our office PLUS 2007-10-09 Page 2 of 22 notes that the applicants are responsible for reading and responding to this letter and all comments contained within it in their entirety. State Strategies/Project Location The State Office of Planning and Coordination recognizes that the proposed development is located within a Level 2 / Level 3 Investment area near the community of Lewes and is an area that we anticipate future growth.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 2 1 | P a G E Chapter II- the D/KC
    Chapter II- THE D/KC MPO STUDY AREA CHARACTERISTICS AND PROJECTED CONDITIONS General Area Characteristics The D/KC MPO metropolitan planning area consists of Kent County, Delaware (the County). As the middle of the three counties in the state of Delaware, the County is situated between New Castle County (more intensely developed) to the north and Sussex County (predominantly rural) to the south. Although the three counties have different land use and transportation planning challenges, they share the fact that the Delaware Department of Transportation (DelDOT) is responsible for 90% of all roads within the State (DelDOT Annual Report and Transportation Facts, 2018, pp. 4). In addition to different land use and transportation challenges, all three counties have a designated Urbanized Area associated with a metropolitan planning organization (MPO). The Dover, Delaware Urbanized Area (UA) (established after the 1990 US Census) is located in the middle of the County and extends (after the 2010 Census) just north into New Castle County. The small portion of the Dover, Delaware UA that extends into New Castle County is supported by WILMAPCO (the MPO responsible for New Castle County) through an agreement. This chapter will focus on different types of land use information that helps define the general characteristics in the County and that help establish a baseline when measuring projected conditions out to 2045. Data An essential aspect of the MTP planning process includes obtaining and analyzing data to assist in the development of MTPs and, specifically, in this instance, the Innovation 2045 MTP Update. A variety of data and planning studies were collected and reviewed from federal, state, regional, and local agencies to ensure the latest available information was used to update Innovation 2045 MTP.
    [Show full text]
  • Current Corridor Plans
    SECTION 4: CURRENT CORRIDOR PLANS SR1 SR 1 - Dover Air Force Base south to Nassau Timeframe: 1991 - 1998 4 Status: Plan Completed Strategy for Delaware Route 1 The plan for Delaware Route 1 is to convert the corridor to limited access over time. This will be accomplished by: • Purchasing property rights (access rights, development rights, fee simple) as new devel- opment is proposed (reactive approach). We are considering taking a more proactive approach to purchase of property rights in the future. This will involve the development of criteria to prioritize property acquisitions. • Coordinate new development with proposed improvements. • Prioritize capital projects (i.e. interchanges, service roads) identified in the com- pleted corridor plan. Develop a monitoring/triggering program to better define the appropriate timing to construct proposed improvements. • Interim improvements - Determine whether less expensive interim improvements may be made. • Design and build capital projects as needed. (See Section 2 for specifics in Communities, Developing Areas, Secondary Developing areas and Rural locations) 4 CURRENT CORRIDOR PLANS SR1 SR 1 Background The SR 1 corridor includes all property with frontage on SR1 or located within 500 feet of its centerline. The limits of the SR1 corridor are the Dover Air Force Base (DAFB) to the north, and the Nassau overpass near Lewes to the south. The corridor is approximately 46 miles long, and extends through Kent and Sussex Counties. SR 1 serves as the main north-south highway to access the Delaware beach resort area. Prior to completion of the ten projects listed below, in addition to resort traffic, eastern Sussex County had been experiencing a high rate of growth in year-round residential traffic and supporting commercial development.
    [Show full text]
  • Srlrp Or Dnuwnnn Exscurryn Deplnruonr Onnrco Or Sure Pr.Annrnc Coonornarron
    Srlrp or Dnuwnnn Exscurryn DeplnruoNr Onnrco or Sure Pr.aNNrNc CoonornarroN August 2I,2019 Mr. Ron Sutton Civil Engineering Associates 55 West Main Street Middletown, DE 19709 RE: PLUS review 2019-07-03; Millville by the Sea Master Plan Dear Mr. Sutton: Thank you for meeting with State agency planners on July 24,2019 to discuss the proposed plans for the Millville by the Sea Master Plan project. According to the information received you are seeking review of a master plan for a 686.8 acre to include 2,885 residential units and 67.7 acres of commercial area. Please note that changes to the plan, other than those suggested in this letter, could result in additional comments from the State. Additionally, these comments reflect only issues that are the responsibility of the agencies represented at the meeting. As discussed at the meeting the master plan areas will not need to go back through PLUS for each site developer, however it may need to be reviewed again if additional lands are added, major changes are made to the overall site plan, or uses of the areas are changed; i.e, residential to commercial or commercial to residential. Ifchanges are planned, the developer should contact this office to discuss. The developers will also need to comply with any Federal, State, and local regulations regarding this property. We also note that as The T own of Millville is the governing authority over this land, the developers will need to comply with any and all regulations/restrictions set forth by the town. Stratesies for State Policies and Snendins This project is located in Investment Levels 2 and 3 according to the Strategies for State Policies and Spending.
    [Show full text]