MONUMENTS MARKERS and TABLETS On
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
“It Rushed Into the Fight with Its Well
IRISH BRIGADE Edited by Robert McLernon IRISH BRIGADE “…It Rushed Into The Fight With Its Well-known Gallantry…” I often find tributes to the courage and gallantry of the Irish Brigade in combat. William F. Fox Regimental Losses In The Civil War (1889) Page 118: “The Irish Brigade was, probably, the best known of any brigade organization, it having made an unusual reputation for dash and gallantry. The remarkable precision of its evolutions under fire; its desperate attack on the impregnable wall at Marye’s Heights; its never failing promptness on every field, and its long continuous service, made for it a name inseparable from the history of the war.” Joseph G. Bilby Remember Fontenoy! Introduction: “It was, many said, the best brigade in the Army of the Potomac. Some said it was the best brigade in the whole Union army and perhaps the best infantry brigade on either side in the American Civil War. Others, with the perspective of history, have come to believe it may have been the best infantry brigade that ever was.” William F. Fox Final Report on the Battlefield of Gettysburg – New York at Gettysburg, p. 485: “It would be impossible to write the history of the Army of the Potomac without giving the highest of praise to the gallant Irish Brigade.” “Their deeds will be remembered in song and in story so long as the history of our country is read. Irishmen everywhere have reason to be proud of the Irish Brigade.” Speech of Col. James D. Brady, 63rd New York “The Irish Brigade’s loss of 961 soldiers killed or mortally wounded in action was exceeded by only two other brigades in the Union army.” Fox “Regimental Losses” The other two were the Vermont Brigade, and the Iron Brigade. -
VOL. XLIII, NO. 8 Michigan Regimental Round Table Newsletter—Page 1 August 2003
VOL. XLIII, NO. 8 Michigan Regimental Round Table Newsletter—Page 1 August 2003 "It wasn't like a battle at all…it was more like Indian warfare," remembered John McClure, a young private in the 14th Indiana Infantry. "I hid behind a tree and looked out. Across the way…was a rebel aiming at me. I put my hat on a stick…and stuck it out from behind the tree-as bait. Then I saw him peep out of the thicket and I shot him. It was the first time I'd ever seen the man I'd killed, and it was an awful feeling." This deadly incident, on May 5, 1864, was only one of such commonplace bloody episodes that occurred in the bitter struggle known as the Wilderness. Beginning in 1864 North and South stood in weary stalemate. All of the Federal victories from the previous year, including Gettysburg and Vicksburg, had seriously weakened the Confederacy, but, it remained bowed, not broken. For the North to win the war, now starting its fourth year, the Confederate armies must be crushed. The South, conversely, had one final hope: stymie the North's plans and count upon a war-weary Northern home front to force the conflict to the peace table. Now in early May of 1864, the two most notable titans of the Civil War, Ulysses S. Grant and Robert E. Lee, were about to come face-to-face in a final showdown to determine the war's outcome. Grant, whose roller coaster career had nearly ended on several occasions, was given the revitalized rank of Lieutenant General by President Lincoln, and the amazingly difficult task of besting the Army of Northern Virginia, something his predecessors had found nigh impossible. -
Pdf Images 83-95
Annual Catalogue OF THE.... i University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, Indiana. 1 8 9 3 - 9 4 . FIFTIETH Annual Catalogue ....of the.... University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, Indiana. 1 8 9 3=9 4 . PUBLISHED BY THE UNIVERSITY. TRIBUNE PRINTING COMPANY PRESS, SOUTH BEND, INDIANA. 0 MAR't TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY. 3 Board of Trustees. VERY REV. WILLIAM CORBY, C. S. C., P r e s id e n t . REV. DANIEL J. SPILLARD, C. S. C., V i c e -P r e s i d e n t . REV. ANDREW MORRISSEY, C. S. C., C h a n c e l l o r . REV. JOHN A. ZAHM, C. S. C., S e c r e t a r y . BRO. EDWARD, C. S. C., T r e a s u r e r . 4 UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME. Officers of the University. REV. ANDREW MORRISSEY, C. S. C., P r e s id e n t . R e v . JAM ES J. F R E N C H , C. S. C., Vice President and Director of Studies. R e v . MARTIN J. REGAN, C. S. C., Prefect of Discipline. R e v . D A N IE L J. S P IL L A R D , C. S. C., Prefect of Religion. BRO. PAUL, C. S. C., S e c r e t a r y . BRO. CELESTINE, C. S. C., A ssist a n t S e c r e t a r y . Assistant Prefects of Discipline. Brownson Hall. B ro . EMMANUEL, C. -
Farmington Town Clerks and Their Times CT
/-i-?f /{/C/•'{'> \-OtXcx FARMINGTON TOWN CLERKS' AND THEIR TIMES Of this book there have been printed four hundred copies of which this is Number':3.^^-^ ii t:? » — — '* • * ^I ■ * % ^ ^ '\ --^lAniy,-. 'tS Icn^^o-. P.^'^S-.;ivl''/^ ' jCc kii.iAUiM.i::'i.c^ heUoxYj- ike 'rrp^Kf^' 'S> ^" ■ tCboai-e/i loiliem-ion. /AG i-oo- X^tf.r ^(i^e- ^ fee ^ ^' X' fywtne^r //^Y ^^ •pLOjSf^'. xrKa^--YOttS h) ^'''ir ^'ty^^—'y'^^'^'nff/lt-nS'Sv'Z ^•'tmtrrv^^t oi- ine sj?>ft''*''»^'. ^ ^Z' pia6t'>oi/t Je^>^'^kk,p^« •-ptW:•^o^e^on. ff i:^(-{^ '{^(' £ef'j Mtrtidif^'lp ^n. ^AtLe-. p'?rtS-/' »vr ^ - -l-A-CS ^2y»tj Aoen.'. -ini Jriiriinx.^ U aU.C.'ite ■ /('iiij oik-etr- qx'ttu-.Sf^ ax\<^-%KCi(^:/^sff-S it/irAi a Ar- -p£i't-;i'^i^^»o'>^' ^ Ckiiit tuuif. \^tCc '•■- - f r*«f- ( - ~jr ^ ^ fl # • / -j-^ wteriftrx i*iri[£ ^ •■}\n^defm. bctC\f~ ! ^ ''Jo V^l?"'"'".-, bj^ati—. Af" •t;a/ZE ' o-'~" * J^"'";.-' / " •' '. -/a'c £ettde'. tif ■/'***^ AttrL <yf> ■ ♦ '-y /i -i-/.r ytd^n US ^f^J£2r^kc^ .y i i . J/ ♦/ /- ^...•_Z/x /_Z «^«>a h<?v!l ^I "W .£* cf Uifn > ' wtA:;, tti>j Ac A»t'- ^^/'is»«-5' ih'entfj^A hit'T-: Sf/n "-yiCCyi ^ /v/iLtt— i-it- iv'-^' *;.i * '"' :^, . ■ I 'tuLir^h.- (J'ARMINGTON TOWN GLERKR AND THEIR TIMES ■JS M (1645-1940) •UAH - L MH--VV-- • fSiJ-iJAr ,•.. .. .■: RSk''^. V ■ T BY MABEL S. H URLBURT A'y*: ■ . i;.'.-^ :- = ' ^ J-^'^.- V«^- a ^'/ s^apA of record dated 1650, of the agreement of distribution of land to the Tunxis Indians. -
Did Meade Begin a Counteroffensive After Pickett's Charge?
Did Meade Begin a Counteroffensive after Pickett’s Charge? Troy D. Harman When examining the strategy of Union Major General George Gordon Meade at the battle of Gettysburg, one discovers lingering doubts about his leadership and will to fight. His rivals viewed him as a timid commander who would not have engaged at Gettysburg had not his peers corralled him into it. On the first day of the battle, for instance, it was Major General John Fulton Reynolds who entangled the left wing of the federal army thirty miles north of its original defensive position at Westminster, Maryland. Under the circumstances, Meade scrambled to rush the rest of his army to the developing battlefield. And on the second day, Major General Daniel Sickles advanced part of his Union 3rd Corps several hundred yards ahead of the designated position on the army’s left, and forced Meade to over-commit forces there to save the situation. In both instances the Union army prevailed, while the Confederate high command struggled to adjust to uncharacteristically aggressive Union moves. However, it would appear that both outcomes were the result of actions initiated by someone other than Meade, who seemed to react well enough. Frustrating to Meade must have been that these same two outcomes could have been viewed in a way more favorable to the commanding general. For example, both Reynolds and Sickles were dependent on Meade to follow through with their bold moves. Though Reynolds committed 25,000 Union infantry to fight at Gettysburg, it was Meade who authorized his advance into south-central Pennsylvania. -
Gettysburg: Three Days of Glory Study Guide
GETTYSBURG: THREE DAYS OF GLORY STUDY GUIDE CONFEDERATE AND UNION ORDERS OF BATTLE ABBREVIATIONS MILITARY RANK MG = Major General BG = Brigadier General Col = Colonel Ltc = Lieutenant Colonel Maj = Major Cpt = Captain Lt = Lieutenant Sgt = Sergeant CASUALTY DESIGNATION (w) = wounded (mw) = mortally wounded (k) = killed in action (c) = captured ARMY OF THE POTOMAC MG George G. Meade, Commanding GENERAL STAFF: (Selected Members) Chief of Staff: MG Daniel Butterfield Chief Quartermaster: BG Rufus Ingalls Chief of Artillery: BG Henry J. Hunt Medical Director: Maj Jonathan Letterman Chief of Engineers: BG Gouverneur K. Warren I CORPS MG John F. Reynolds (k) MG Abner Doubleday MG John Newton First Division - BG James S. Wadsworth 1st Brigade - BG Solomon Meredith (w) Col William W. Robinson 2nd Brigade - BG Lysander Cutler Second Division - BG John C. Robinson 1st Brigade - BG Gabriel R. Paul (w), Col Samuel H. Leonard (w), Col Adrian R. Root (w&c), Col Richard Coulter (w), Col Peter Lyle, Col Richard Coulter 2nd Brigade - BG Henry Baxter Third Division - MG Abner Doubleday, BG Thomas A. Rowley Gettysburg: Three Days of Glory Study Guide Page 1 1st Brigade - Col Chapman Biddle, BG Thomas A. Rowley, Col Chapman Biddle 2nd Brigade - Col Roy Stone (w), Col Langhorne Wister (w). Col Edmund L. Dana 3rd Brigade - BG George J. Stannard (w), Col Francis V. Randall Artillery Brigade - Col Charles S. Wainwright II CORPS MG Winfield S. Hancock (w) BG John Gibbon BG William Hays First Division - BG John C. Caldwell 1st Brigade - Col Edward E. Cross (mw), Col H. Boyd McKeen 2nd Brigade - Col Patrick Kelly 3rd Brigade - BG Samuel K. -
Course Reader
Course Reader Gettysburg: History and Memory Professor Allen Guelzo The content of this reader is only for educational use in conjunction with the Gilder Lehrman Institute’s Teacher Seminar Program. Any unauthorized use, such as distributing, copying, modifying, displaying, transmitting, or reprinting, is strictly prohibited. GETTYSBURG in HISTORY and MEMORY DOCUMENTS and PAPERS A.R. Boteler, “Stonewall Jackson In Campaign Of 1862,” Southern Historical Society Papers 40 (September 1915) The Situation James Longstreet, “Lee in Pennsylvania,” in Annals of the War (Philadelphia, 1879) 1863 “Letter from Major-General Henry Heth,” SHSP 4 (September 1877) Lee to Jefferson Davis (June 10, 1863), in O.R., series one, 27 (pt 3) Richard Taylor, Destruction and Reconstruction: Personal Experiences of the Late War (Edinburgh, 1879) John S. Robson, How a One-Legged Rebel Lives: Reminiscences of the Civil War (Durham, NC, 1898) George H. Washburn, A Complete Military History and Record of the 108th Regiment N.Y. Vols., from 1862 to 1894 (Rochester, 1894) Thomas Hyde, Following the Greek Cross, or Memories of the Sixth Army Corps (Boston, 1894) Spencer Glasgow Welch to Cordelia Strother Welch (August 18, 1862), in A Confederate Surgeon’s Letters to His Wife (New York, 1911) The Armies The Road to Richmond: Civil War Memoirs of Major Abner R. Small of the Sixteenth Maine Volunteers, ed. H.A. Small (Berkeley, 1939) Mrs. Arabella M. Willson, Disaster, Struggle, Triumph: The Adventures of 1000 “Boys in Blue,” from August, 1862, until June, 1865 (Albany, 1870) John H. Rhodes, The History of Battery B, First Regiment Rhode Island Light Artillery, in the War to Preserve the Union (Providence, 1894) A Gallant Captain of the Civil War: Being the Record of the Extraordinary Adventures of Frederick Otto Baron von Fritsch, ed. -
Gettysburg Essay
Essential Civil War Curriculum | Garry E. Adelman Gettysburg | March 2017 The Battle of Gettysburg By Garry E. Adelman with James Taub, Civil War Trust fter his May 1863 victory at the Battle of Chancellorsville, Confederate General Robert E. Lee ordered his Army of Northern Virginia into the Blue Ridge A Mountains where his northward movement was screened by the terrain. Using what intelligence he could assemble, Union Major General Joseph Hooker, succeeded on June 28 by Major General George Gordon Meade, aimed to keep the main body of his Army of the Potomac between General Lee and the U.S. Capital at Washington. In late June, Confederate forces were spread out on a 90-mile front across south central Pennsylvania, with Union forces edging ever closer to the Southerners. Lacking most of his cavalry, which was engaged in a raid around the Federal army, General Lee was unaware of the approaching Federal forces until the end of June, whereupon he ordered his three corps to converge near Gettysburg. At that same time, the most advance Union element—Brigadier General John Buford’s cavalry division—arrived in Gettysburg on June 30, 1863. Buford saw the importance of controlling the network of ten Essential Civil War Curriculum | Copyright 2017 Virginia Center for Civil War Studies at Virginia Tech Page 1 of 9 Essential Civil War Curriculum | Garry E. Adelman Gettysburg | March 2017 roads that converged at the town square and deployed his brigades to the west and north of town. The stage was set for the bloodiest and most famous of all North American battles. -
A Defense of the 63Rd New York State Volunteer Regiment of the Irish Brigade Patricia Vaticano
University of Richmond UR Scholarship Repository Master's Theses Student Research 5-2008 A defense of the 63rd New York State Volunteer Regiment of the Irish Brigade Patricia Vaticano Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.richmond.edu/masters-theses Recommended Citation Vaticano, Patricia, "A defense of the 63rd New York State Volunteer Regiment of the Irish Brigade" (2008). Master's Theses. Paper 703. This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Research at UR Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of UR Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A DEFENSE OF THE 63RD NEW YORK STATE VOLUNTEER REGIMENT OF THE IRISH BRIGADE By PATRICIA VATICANO Master of Arts in History University of Richmond 2008 Dr. Robert C. Kenzer, Thesis Director During the American Civil War, New York State’s irrepressible Irish Brigade was alternately composed of a number of infantry regiments hailing both from within New York City and from within and without the state, not all of them Irish, or even predominantly so. The Brigade’s core structure, however, remained constant throughout the war years and consisted of three all-Irish volunteer regiments with names corresponding to fighting units made famous in the annuals of Ireland’s history: the 69th, the 88th, and the 63rd. The 69th, or Fighting 69th, having won praise and homage for its actions at First Bull Run, was designated the First Regiment of the Brigade and went on to even greater glory in the Civil War and every American war thereafter. -
The 3 U.S. Infantry During the Civil
The 3rd U.S. Infantry During the Civil War Ryan Quint. Table of Contents Introduction 2 Before the War: A Brief Introduction of the 3rd in the Antebellum Period 3 The War Starts 3 First Bull Run (Manassas) 5 The Peninsula and Seven Days 12 Second Bull Run (2nd Manassas) 21 Antietam 27 Fredericksburg 30 Chancellorsville 36 Gettysburg 41 New York 48 Bristoe Station, Rappahannock Station, and Mine Run 50 New York, Washington, and the end 54 Works Cited 57 Appendix I: Casualties 61 Appendix II- Bull Run 62 Appendix III- Seven Days 67 Appendix IV- Second Bull Run 77 Appendix V- Antietam 84 Appendix VI- Fredericksburg 88 Appendix VII- Chancellorsville 93 Appendix VIII- Gettysburg 98 Appendix IX- Rappahannock Station 106 Appendix X- Mine Run 108 1 Introduction It is my goal that this manual will be a quick-reference guide to names, dates, and locations having to do with the 3rd U.S. Regulars. This manual is by no means inclusive, and I welcome others’ suggestions. This manual will include battle maps, and photographs of key participants to do with the Regulars. At the end there will be a series of appendices that contain casualties and reports filed by individuals later contained in the Official Records of the War of Rebellion. There is a works cited, which also doubles as a suggested reading for those who wish to know more. I hope that this manual is helpful to any and all who wish to know more about the 3rd U.S. Buffsticks! -Ryan Quint Fredericksburg, 2013 2 Before the War: A Brief History of the 3rd in the antebellum period The 3rd U.S. -
The Regulars at Antietam: Opportunity Denied by Dave Welker © 2012
The Regulars at Antietam: Opportunity Denied By Dave Welker © 2012 The US Regulars played a vital role in the Battle of Antietam on September 17th, 1862, although this service is often largely overlooked in the standard histories. That the Regulars are once again left in the background of history could, on the one hand, reflect that the earliest histories of the battle on the Union side were mostly written by volunteers. Or it might be that the Regulars suffered relatively few casualties in comparison with the volunteer regiments, which admittedly did most of the often-horrific fighting that day. But most likely, it is the fact that what the Regulars actually did—as important as that was— wasn’t as important as the role they might have played if allowed to fight. But to understand why that was, we need to start at the beginning. The US Regulars marching into Maryland during the second week of September remained in the same organization they’d served in at the Second Battle of Bull Run barely a week earlier. They comprised the Second (“Regular”) Division of Major General Fitz John Porter’s V Corps, and were serving under Brigadier General George Sykes. Sykes’ First Brigade was led by Lieutenant Colonel Robert C. Buchanan and included the 3rd and 4th Regiments, as well as the 1st and 2nd Battalions of the 12th US Regiment and the 1st and 2nd Battalions of the 14th US Regiment. The Second Brigade was led by Major Charles S. Lovell and consisted of the 1st, 2nd, 6th, 10th, 11th, and 17th Regiments. -
From the President …
GRAND ARMY SCOUT Newsletter of the GAR Civil War Museum & Library Spring 2018 Where the Civil War comes alive! From the President …. Our Annual Meeting Each September the Grand Army of the Republic Civil BOARD OF DIRECTORS War Museum and Library holds its annual meeting. It is President HUGH BOYLE a meeting for the membership. It is at that time when Executive Director board members are elected, the museum status is HUGH BOYLE Vice President - Programs stated, such as the financial report. Accomplishments ANTHONY WASKIE, PH.D. Treasurer - Curator are reported and future plans and projects are offered. HERB KAUFMAN Secretary It is also at time for the members to voice the hopes for MARY ANN HARTNER the museum. It is the most important meeting of the Board Emeritus MARGARET E. ATKINSON th year. This year the meeting is on September 30 , the last Sunday of the WALT LAFTY – Research Administrator JOE PERRY – Librarian month. We ask all our membership to attend. MICHAEL E. PETER KATHLEEN M. SMITH – Membership, Special Events There are three board spots up for election. Herb Kaufman and Joe BOARD OF ADVISORS Perry, current board members have chosen to be in the election EDWIN BEARSS ALBERT EL process. Due to the untimely death of Teo Monteiro there is an open DR. GARY GROVE spot for the board. This is an election process and all spots are up for DR. ALLEN C. GUELZO election. Any member of the museum can be nominated by another ROBERT E. HANRAHAN, JR. LEON KING, ESQ. member, and that can be done by submitting a name to myself at JAMES M.