DOCSLIB.ORG

AUTUMN 2012 8/10/12 13:17 Page 1

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

sip AUTUMN 2012 8/10/12 13:17 Page 1 SCIENCE IN PARLIAMENT A proton collides with a proton The Higgs boson appears at last sip AUTUMN 2012 The Journal of the Parliamentary and Scientific Committee www.scienceinparliament.org.uk sip AUTUMN 2012 8/10/12 13:17 Page 2 Physics for All Science and engineering students are important for the future of the UK IOP wants to see more people studying physics www.iop.org / 35 $' 3$5/, $ LQGG sip AUTUMN 2012 8/10/12 13:17 Page 3 Last years's winter of discontent was indeed made SCIENCE IN PARLIAMENT glorious summer by several sons and daughters of York. So many medals in the Olympics were won by scions of Yorkshire that the county claimed tenth place in the medals table, something hard to accept on my side of the Pennines! As well as being fantastic athletic performances the Olympics and Paralympics were stunning demonstrations of the efficiency of UK engineering, and sip the imagination of British science. The Journal of the Parliamentary and Scientific Surely we have good reason to be all eagerly awaiting Andrew Miller MP Committee. Chairman, Parliamentary The Committee is an Associate Parliamentary the announcements from Stockholm of this year's Nobel and Scientific Group of members of both Houses of Prizes? Surely the Higgs boson will be recognised? John Committee Parliament and British members of the European Parliament, representatives of Ellis recently eloquently described the "legacy" of the scientific and technical institutions, industrial hadron collider and we would be missing an important organisations and universities. opportunity if we didn't use it to help inspire the next generation. This point was not missed by John Wormersley, Chief Executive of the Science and Technology Facilities Council, in the excitement of the 4th July announcement. Meanwhile back in Whitehall, David Willetts has made available some funding for the TSB, and also to help Science in Parliament has two main objectives: universities to meet the costs associated with open access 1. to inform the scientific and industrial communities of activities within Parliament publishing. of a scientific nature and of the progress of relevant legislation; However, within a few weeks we will start to understand 2. to keep Members of Parliament abreast of what effect on science admissions the crippling increase in scientific affairs. tuition fees has had. Let us hope that the salaries offered by future employers will enable graduates to meet their obligations! CONTENTS MARS – A HAPPY LANDING 2 PLUGGING IN 20 INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGY IN EDUCATION 40 Professor John Zarnecki Paul Davies Dr Ellie Dommett LARGE HADRON COLLIDER COMES TO HIV/AIDS AND TUBERCULOSIS IN THE GOLD SCIENCE AND THE DEVOLVED BODIES 41 PARLIAMENT 4 MINING INDUSTRY IN SOUTH AFRICA 22 SELECTED DEBATES 42 Professor John Womersley Rt Hon Peter Hain MP and Martin Caton MP HOUSE OF LORDS SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY HOW WE CAN MEET THE MEASUREMENT OBITUARY: The Rt Hon Lord Morris of Manchester 24 SELECT COMMITTEE 43 CHALLENGES OF THE COMING DECADE 6 THE QUEEN’S DIAMOND JUBILEE: A CELEBRATION Kamal Hossain HOUSE OF COMMONS SELECT COMMITTEE ON OF SCIENCE 25 SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY 44 MEETING THE NEED FOR PHYSICS TEACHERS 8 Ken Brown, Brian Cox, Paul Glendinning, Natasha Professor Peter Main McCarthy, Nancy Rothwell, Christopher White, Lesley PARLIAMENTARY OFFICE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY 46 BIOLOGY WEEK 2012 10 Yellowlees HOUSE OF COMMONS LIBRARY SCIENCE AND AN UNSCIENTIFIC CAMPAIGN 36 ANIMAL EXPERIMENTATION: ENVIRONMENT SECTION 48 ARE EU REGULATIONS ADEQUATE? 12 Bradley Keelor SCIENCE DIRECTORY 50 Addresses to the P&SC by Dr Judy MacArthur Clark, NORTHERN LIGHTS 38 Dr Maggy Jennings and Dr Stephen Mitchell Hazel Gibson SCIENCE DIARY 59 PARLIAMENTARY LINKS DAY 2012 18 Science in Parliament Vol 69 No 4 Autumn 2012 1 sip AUTUMN 2012 8/10/12 13:17 Page 4 MARS – A HAPPY LANDING The successful landing of inflated around the precious nylon ropes to a gentle landing. NASA’s Curiosity Rover, or Mars payload during the last stages of This technique has been Science Laboratory (MSL) descent. This works well but dubbed the “skycrane” for mission to give it its full name, there is a limit to the mass (and obvious reasons. But why not on August 6th 2012 was truly a therefore size) of payload which use the retro rockets for a slow great feat of space engineering. can be delivered in this way. controlled final descent all the Why, you may ask, as landers With the proposed MSL, we had way down you might ask? Well, and rovers have been delivered already reached that limit. So the exhaust from the rockets to the surface of Mars since as space engineers had to devise a would have thrown up so much far back as 1975. Well, the new scheme – and what they dust and debris from the Professor John Zarnecki answer, at least partly, lies in the came up with did almost seem Martian surface that the delicate Professor of Space Science, size and weight of the MSL. It like science fiction, even to the instruments would have been Planetary & Space Sciences Research Institute, The Open weighs in at a total of 899 kg, University only about 10% less than my car! Previous rovers, for example, . the most sophisticated array delivered to the surface of Mars of instruments ever . have ranged from a mere 10.5 kg for the Mars Pathfinder up to 185 kg each for the highly designers themselves! It damaged or even destroyed. successful Spirit and Opportunity involved an initial descent under Furthermore, the landing area rovers (although the total a parachute followed by the would have been significantly “landed” masses in all cases was firing of 8 retro rockets when the chemically altered by the rockets slightly greater than the rover payload was about 1 km above – and one of the prime aims of mass). The “traditional” the surface in order to slow the MSL is to carry out a technique for delivering a down the payload further. At this detailed chemical analysis of the package to the surface of Mars point, the designers’ imagination Martian surface. involved an atmospheric braking really took hold – they Because of the novelty of the at the top of the atmosphere developed a system which landing system, there was real followed by a parachute descent involved lowering the precious trepidation in the MSL team at and finally, if required, a fall payload from a height of some NASA and the research institutes cushioned by airbags which are 8 m above the surface on three and in the worldwide Mars community. But the landing . carry out a detailed chemical seems to have happened nearly flawlessly – a tribute to analysis of the Martian surface. outstanding design and a meticulous test programme designed to tease out any flaws on the Earth before launch rather than during the real landing! And what of MSL’s future? It carries the most sophisticated array of instruments ever sent to the Red planet, including some never before deployed there. We want to study Mars for several reasons – it is our near neighbour, made of much the same stuff as Earth and once, in NASA/JPL-Caltech/MSSS its early history, much warmer One of the earliest images taken by the Mast Camera on the Curiosity rover from the landing site. It shows and wetter and with a thicker interesting geology on the lower slopes of the nearby Mount Sharp. The region in the middle distance is believed to be an area of sand dunes which the rover will attempt to circumnavigate in order to reach the base atmosphere than now – of Mount Sharp where water is thought to have existed in the distant past. perhaps not too dissimilar to 2 Science in Parliament Vol 69 No 4 Autumn 2012 sip AUTUMN 2012 8/10/12 13:17 Page 5 early Earth. But somewhere 150 km sized impact crater . evolutionary paths of Earth and along the line, the evolutionary formed about 3.5 billion years paths of Earth and Mars have ago as a result of an asteroid Mars have diverged . diverged to make them rather impact with Mars. But the target different worlds today. Why? area was much smaller than this to address the above questions. the first controlled landing on That’s just one of the questions – it is an ellipse of 7 x 20 km at The 12 scientific instruments Mars in 1975. can be divided into the following that Planetologsts want to the base of a mountain within At the time of writing, MSL is broad categories: cameras, answer. Secondly, despite us the crater. This region was just coming to the end of its spectrometers, radiation having found exotic selected after painstaking work commissioning phase – all of detectors, environmental sensors environments elsewhere in the by Martian experts worldwide to the instruments and on board and atmospheric sensors. Taking Solar System, (such as certain of select the region most likely to systems, including the robot up nearly half of the entire the moons of Jupiter and show tangible signs of life arm, are being put through their payload is the SAM (Science Saturn), Mars probably still should it ever have existed. This paces. So far, almost everything Analysis at Mars) instrument for region shows distinctive is working to plan – and the presents the best chance of the purpose of analysing Rover has taken its first tentative elements and compounds that “steps”, moving for example are associated with life. Another 15m on Sol 22 (a Sol is a instrument is the ChemCam Martian day). which will employ Laser Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy, a MSL is a NASA mission with technique used in terrestrial two of the instruments coming applications but never so far also from Russia and Spain.
Recommended publications
  • Celebrating Alf's Act 50 Years of Disabled

    Celebrating Alf's Act 50 Years of Disabled

    Celebrating Alf’s Act 50 Years of Disabled People’s Rights Celebrate – Learn – Challenge Due to Covid-19 Manchester Histories Festival will be presenting its first ever DigiFest, taking place on Friday 4 & Saturday 5th September 2020. DigiFest 2020 will create a collective on-line space for disabled and non- disabled people to present their stories, ideas and content through our very own pop-up TV Studio, broadcasting live across the globe from Manchester. To enable us to make this an inspiring experience, Manchester Histories is calling out for ideas and digital content based around the themes of the festival which are Celebrate – Learn – Challenge. There are three ways you can get involved: 1.) Send us your ideas of what you would like to see happen as part of the live broadcast, these can be based around a discussion, debate, on-line panel, campaign, or an on-line competition or poll to find out people’s responses to 50 years of disabled people’s rights. Please complete the form below, sections 1 2 and 3. 1 2.) Send or link us to any pre-recorded digital content, such as videos, film, music, documentary, performance, or work that profiles or promotes your organisation/group that fit with the themes of the festival. Please complete form below, sections 1 2 and 4. 3.) Manchester Histories and partners are interested in getting responses from disabled people on Covid-19. It's important that we document these times in our history. Some of the responses will help shape and contribute to the live debate we are hosting on Saturday 5th September 2020, and some contributions may be used in the short films we are making about Alf Morris.
  • Sequencing As a Way of Work

    Sequencing As a Way of Work

    Edinburgh Research Explorer A new insight into Sanger’s development of sequencing Citation for published version: Garcia-Sancho, M 2010, 'A new insight into Sanger’s development of sequencing: From proteins to DNA, 1943-77', Journal of the History of Biology, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 265-323. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10739-009- 9184-1 Digital Object Identifier (DOI): 10.1007/s10739-009-9184-1 Link: Link to publication record in Edinburgh Research Explorer Document Version: Peer reviewed version Published In: Journal of the History of Biology Publisher Rights Statement: © Garcia-Sancho, M. (2010). A new insight into Sanger’s development of sequencing: From proteins to DNA, 1943-77. Journal of the History of Biology, 43(2), 265-323. 10.1007/s10739-009-9184-1 General rights Copyright for the publications made accessible via the Edinburgh Research Explorer is retained by the author(s) and / or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing these publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Take down policy The University of Edinburgh has made every reasonable effort to ensure that Edinburgh Research Explorer content complies with UK legislation. If you believe that the public display of this file breaches copyright please contact [email protected] providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 28. Sep. 2021 THIS IS AN ADVANCED DRAFT OF A PUBLISHED PAPER. REFERENCES AND QUOTATIONS SHOULD ALWAYS BE MADE TO THE PUBLISHED VERION, WHICH CAN BE FOUND AT: García-Sancho M.
  • Mothers in Science

    Mothers in Science

    The aim of this book is to illustrate, graphically, that it is perfectly possible to combine a successful and fulfilling career in research science with motherhood, and that there are no rules about how to do this. On each page you will find a timeline showing on one side, the career path of a research group leader in academic science, and on the other side, important events in her family life. Each contributor has also provided a brief text about their research and about how they have combined their career and family commitments. This project was funded by a Rosalind Franklin Award from the Royal Society 1 Foreword It is well known that women are under-represented in careers in These rules are part of a much wider mythology among scientists of science. In academia, considerable attention has been focused on the both genders at the PhD and post-doctoral stages in their careers. paucity of women at lecturer level, and the even more lamentable The myths bubble up from the combination of two aspects of the state of affairs at more senior levels. The academic career path has academic science environment. First, a quick look at the numbers a long apprenticeship. Typically there is an undergraduate degree, immediately shows that there are far fewer lectureship positions followed by a PhD, then some post-doctoral research contracts and than qualified candidates to fill them. Second, the mentors of early research fellowships, and then finally a more stable lectureship or career researchers are academic scientists who have successfully permanent research leader position, with promotion on up the made the transition to lectureships and beyond.
  • Cambridge's 92 Nobel Prize Winners Part 2 - 1951 to 1974: from Crick and Watson to Dorothy Hodgkin

    Cambridge's 92 Nobel Prize Winners Part 2 - 1951 to 1974: from Crick and Watson to Dorothy Hodgkin

    Cambridge's 92 Nobel Prize winners part 2 - 1951 to 1974: from Crick and Watson to Dorothy Hodgkin By Cambridge News | Posted: January 18, 2016 By Adam Care The News has been rounding up all of Cambridge's 92 Nobel Laureates, celebrating over 100 years of scientific and social innovation. ADVERTISING In this installment we move from 1951 to 1974, a period which saw a host of dramatic breakthroughs, in biology, atomic science, the discovery of pulsars and theories of global trade. It's also a period which saw The Eagle pub come to national prominence and the appearance of the first female name in Cambridge University's long Nobel history. The Gender Pay Gap Sale! Shop Online to get 13.9% off From 8 - 11 March, get 13.9% off 1,000s of items, it highlights the pay gap between men & women in the UK. Shop the Gender Pay Gap Sale – now. Promoted by Oxfam 1. 1951 Ernest Walton, Trinity College: Nobel Prize in Physics, for using accelerated particles to study atomic nuclei 2. 1951 John Cockcroft, St John's / Churchill Colleges: Nobel Prize in Physics, for using accelerated particles to study atomic nuclei Walton and Cockcroft shared the 1951 physics prize after they famously 'split the atom' in Cambridge 1932, ushering in the nuclear age with their particle accelerator, the Cockcroft-Walton generator. In later years Walton returned to his native Ireland, as a fellow of Trinity College Dublin, while in 1951 Cockcroft became the first master of Churchill College, where he died 16 years later. 3. 1952 Archer Martin, Peterhouse: Nobel Prize in Chemistry, for developing partition chromatography 4.
  • A Comparitive Study of Asymmetric Key Cryptography

    A Comparitive Study of Asymmetric Key Cryptography

    Vol-5 Issue-3 2019 IJARIIE-ISSN(O)-2395-4396 A COMPARITIVE STUDY OF ASYMMETRIC KEY CRYPTOGRAPHY Dr. Prashant P. Pittalia Associate Professor, Department of Computer Science, Gujarat, India ABSTRACT Cryptography is use to secure the computer networks. Cryptography converts the plain text into cipher text such a way that it is impossible for intruders to read and understand the content. Asymmetric key cryptography is based on the public key and private key concepts to support the confidentiality and authentication services in computer networks. This paper describes how confidentiality and authentication service provides by asymmetric key algorithms. In this paper the discussion and comparison of a asymmetric key algorithms like RSA, Diffie-Hellman, ElGamal and ECC. Keyword: - RSA, Authentication, Public key, Private Key, Confidentiality 1. INTRODUCTION Today in global village the internet security is the challenging aspect and cryptography is used for it. Cryptography is the mathematical techniques of information security. It supports confidentiality, privacy, and data integrity and entity authentication. Cryptography systems classified into two main categories symmetric-key cryptography that use a symmetric key used by both sender and recipient and a public-key cryptography that use two keys, a public key known to everyone in the network and a private key that is used by only the recipient of the messages. Symmetric algorithms use the same secret key for both encryption of plaintext and decryption of cipher text. The keys may be same or there may be an easy transformation to go between the two keys. The key is shared between the two parties (sender and receiver) who want to communicate.
  • Female Fellows of the Royal Society

    Female Fellows of the Royal Society

    Female Fellows of the Royal Society Professor Jan Anderson FRS [1996] Professor Ruth Lynden-Bell FRS [2006] Professor Judith Armitage FRS [2013] Dr Mary Lyon FRS [1973] Professor Frances Ashcroft FMedSci FRS [1999] Professor Georgina Mace CBE FRS [2002] Professor Gillian Bates FMedSci FRS [2007] Professor Trudy Mackay FRS [2006] Professor Jean Beggs CBE FRS [1998] Professor Enid MacRobbie FRS [1991] Dame Jocelyn Bell Burnell DBE FRS [2003] Dr Philippa Marrack FMedSci FRS [1997] Dame Valerie Beral DBE FMedSci FRS [2006] Professor Dusa McDuff FRS [1994] Dr Mariann Bienz FMedSci FRS [2003] Professor Angela McLean FRS [2009] Professor Elizabeth Blackburn AC FRS [1992] Professor Anne Mills FMedSci FRS [2013] Professor Andrea Brand FMedSci FRS [2010] Professor Brenda Milner CC FRS [1979] Professor Eleanor Burbidge FRS [1964] Dr Anne O'Garra FMedSci FRS [2008] Professor Eleanor Campbell FRS [2010] Dame Bridget Ogilvie AC DBE FMedSci FRS [2003] Professor Doreen Cantrell FMedSci FRS [2011] Baroness Onora O'Neill * CBE FBA FMedSci FRS [2007] Professor Lorna Casselton CBE FRS [1999] Dame Linda Partridge DBE FMedSci FRS [1996] Professor Deborah Charlesworth FRS [2005] Dr Barbara Pearse FRS [1988] Professor Jennifer Clack FRS [2009] Professor Fiona Powrie FRS [2011] Professor Nicola Clayton FRS [2010] Professor Susan Rees FRS [2002] Professor Suzanne Cory AC FRS [1992] Professor Daniela Rhodes FRS [2007] Dame Kay Davies DBE FMedSci FRS [2003] Professor Elizabeth Robertson FRS [2003] Professor Caroline Dean OBE FRS [2004] Dame Carol Robinson DBE FMedSci
  • RICHARD LAWRENCE MILLINGTON SYNGE BA, Phd(Cantab), Hondsc(Aberd), Hondsc(E.Anglia), Hon Dphil(Uppsala), FRS Nobel Laureate 1952

    RICHARD LAWRENCE MILLINGTON SYNGE BA, Phd(Cantab), Hondsc(Aberd), Hondsc(E.Anglia), Hon Dphil(Uppsala), FRS Nobel Laureate 1952

    RICHARD LAWRENCE MILLINGTON SYNGE BA, PhD(Cantab), HonDSc(Aberd), HonDSc(E.Anglia), Hon DPhil(Uppsala), FRS Nobel Laureate 1952 R L M Synge was elected FRSE in 1963. He was born in West Kirby, Cheshire, on 28 October 1914, the son of Katherine (née Swan) and Lawrence Millington Synge, a Liverpool Stockbroker. The family was known to be living in Bridgenorth (Salop) in the early sixteenth century. At that time the name was Millington and there is a story that a member of the family from Millington Hall in Rostherne (Cheshire) sang so beautifully before King Henry VIII that he was told to take the name Synge. There have been various spellings of the name and in the nineteenth century the English branch settled on Sing which they retained until 1920 when both R M and L M Sing (Dick's uncle and father respectively) changed their names by deed poll to Synge. In the 19th and 20th centuries the Sing/Synge family played a considerable part in the life of Liverpool and Dick's father was High Sheriff of Cheshire in 1954. Dick was educated at Old Hall, a prep school in Wellington (Salop) and where he became renowned for his ability in Latin and Greek, subjects which he continued to study with such success at Winchester that in December 1931 when, just turned 17, he was awarded an Exhibition in Classics by Trinity College, Cambridge. His intention was to study science and Trinity allowed Dick to switch from classics to the Natural Sciences Tripos. To prepare for the change he returned to Winchester in January 1932 to study science for the next 18 months and was awarded the senior science prize for 1933.
  • Electrochemical and Spectroelectrochemical Characterisation of Cyano and Trifluoromethyl

    Electrochemical and Spectroelectrochemical Characterisation of Cyano and Trifluoromethyl

    Electrochemical and Spectroelectrochemical characterisation of cyano and trifluoromethyl substituted polypyridines and their transition metal complexes Alexander R. L. Delf Thesis submitted for the degree of Ph.D. The University of Edinburgh May 2011 Declaration I hereby declare that this thesis has been entirely composed by myself and that the work described herein is my own except where clearly mentioned either in acknowledgement, reference or text. It has not been submitted in whole or in part for any other degree, diploma or other qualification. Alexander R. L. Delf May 2011 i Acknowledgments First and foremost I would like to thank Prof. Lesley Yellowlees for all of her help, advice, enthusiasm and bars of Swiss chocolate that she has given me during my time with “the lab rats”. But most of all I would like to thank her for believing in me when even I didn’t. Thanks have to go to Prof. Eric Mcinnes for the solid phase EPR simulations. I’d also like to thank the University of Edinburgh crystallography service for the crystal structures. For their help with NMR, Mass Spectrometry and CHN analysis thanks must go to Marika DeCremoux, Alan Talyor and Sylvia Williamson respectively. A special thank you has to go to Dr. Patricia Richardson of the EAsT Chem Research Computing Facility for her all her help and advice on all things computational and for long rambling discussions about interesting aspects of spectroscopy. For helpful discussions about the finer points of electrochemistry I’d like to thank Dr. Andy Mount, Dr. John Henry and Charlotte Brady. Thanks must also go to Dr.
  • Parliamentary Debates (Hansard)

    Parliamentary Debates (Hansard)

    Wednesday Volume 494 24 June 2009 No. 98 HOUSE OF COMMONS OFFICIAL REPORT PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) Wednesday 24 June 2009 £5·00 © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2009 This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Parliamentary Click-Use Licence, available online through the Office of Public Sector Information website at www.opsi.gov.uk/click-use/ Enquiries to the Office of Public Sector Information, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 4DU; Tel: 0044 (0) 208876344; e-mail: [email protected] 777 24 JUNE 2009 778 rightly made the case. I hope she will understand when I House of Commons point her to the work of the World Bank and other international financial institutions on infrastructure in Wednesday 24 June 2009 Ukraine and other countries. We will continue to watch the regional economic needs of Ukraine through our involvement with those institutions. The House met at half-past Eleven o’clock Mr. Gary Streeter (South-West Devon) (Con): Given PRAYERS the strategic significance of Ukraine as a political buffer zone between the EU and Russia, does the Minister not think that it was perhaps an error of judgment to close [MR.SPEAKER in the Chair] the DFID programme in Ukraine last year? It would be an utter tragedy if Ukraine’s democracy should fail, so BUSINESS BEFORE QUESTIONS should we not at the very least be running significant capacity-building programmes to support it? SPOLIATION ADVISORY PANEL Resolved, Mr. Thomas: We are running capacity-building programmes on democracy and good governance through That an Humble Address be presented to Her Majesty, That she will be graciously pleased to give directions that there be laid the Foreign and Commonwealth Office.
  • Chronically-Sick-Disabled-Persons-Act-Service.Pdf

    Chronically-Sick-Disabled-Persons-Act-Service.Pdf

    Westminster Abbey A SERVICE TO MARK THE 40TH ANNIVERSARY OF THE COMING INTO EFFECT OF THE CHRONICALLY SICK AND DISABLED PERSONS ACT (1970) Wednesday 30 March 2011 11.00 am THE CHRONICALLY SICK AND DISABLED PERSONS ACT 1970 In 1969, Alf Morris, then Labour MP for Manchester Wythenshawe, won first place in the ballot for Private Members’ Bills in the House of Commons. He chose to introduce a far-ranging Bill for chronically sick and disabled people. Drafted in less than three weeks, the Bill secured a Second Reading on 5 December 1969 and became law, in dramatic fashion, just ahead of the dissolution of Parliament for the General Election of 1970. The key provisions actually came into force early the following year. Since its implementation, official statistics show that it has helped over sixty million people – more than the present population of this country. Its principal provisions were: rights of access for disabled people to the built environment, including schools and universities the world’s first statutory provision for purpose-built housing for disabled people and help in adapting their homes practical help as of right for disabled people in their homes, including the installation of telephones for those house-bound, and access to transport and other services outside the home the world’s first recognition in law of autism and dyslexia the world’s first legislation for the needs of children who are both blind and pre-lingually deaf the world’s first Institute of Hearing Research The Bill’s philosophy was memorably expressed by the Lord Morris of Manchester, as Alf Morris MP , in the final words of his speech commending his Bill to the House of Commons on 5 December 1969 which we shall hear read in this service.
  • Edit Winter 2013/14

    Edit Winter 2013/14

    WINTER 2013|14 THE ALUMNI MAGAZINE + BILLET & GENERAL COUNCIL PAPERS LAUGHING MATTERS SKY HEAD OF COMEDY LUCY LUMSDEN ON THE FUNNY BUSINESS ROAD TO REFERENDUM HOW OUR EXPERTS ARE SHAPING THE DEBATE ALSO INSIDE AWARD-WINNING FILM'S STUNNING STORY | MEADOWS MEMORIES | ALUMNI WEEKEND PHOTOGRAPHS WINTER 2013|14 CONTENTS FOREWORD CONTENTS elcome to the Winter issue of Edit. The turn 12 26 W of 2014 heralds an exciting year for our staff, students and alumni, and indeed for Scotland. Our experts are part of history as they inform the debate on SAVE THE DATE the referendum (p10), while in a very different arena the 19 - 21 June 2014 University will play a major role in the Commonwealth Toronto, Canada Games in Glasgow (p5). In a nationwide public engagement project our researchers are exploring the 30 10 impact on Scotland of the First World War throughout the four years of its centenary (p17), and on p16 we look back at the heroism of an Edinburgh alumna during the conflict. If you are seeking light relief, you may have to thank Lucy Lumsden. She has commissioned some of 18 Britain's most successful television comedies of recent years, and in our interview (p8) she talks about the importance of making people laugh. We report on an exceptional string of successes, from Professor Peter Higgs's Nobel Prize (p5), to BAFTAs, including one for a documentary whose story is told by a remarkable 04 Update 18 What You Did Next Edinburgh graduate on pages 12-15. Find your friends in photos of our alumni weekend (p22) and, if you couldn't 08 The Interview 20 Edinburgh Experience Lucy Lumsden, make it, we hope to see you at the next one in 2015.
  • 2011 Gairdner Foundation Annual Report

    2011 Gairdner Foundation Annual Report

    2011 GAIRDNER FOUNDATION ANNUAL REPORT May 30, 2012 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ...................................................................................................................................... 2 HISTORY OF THE GAIRDNER FOUNDATION .............................................................................................. 3 MISSION,VISION ................................................................................................................................................ 4 GOALS .................................................................................................................................................................. 5 MESSAGE FROM THE CHAIR .......................................................................................................................... 6 MESSAGE FROM THE PRESIDENT/SCIENTIFIC DIRECTOR ..................................................................... 7 2011 YEAR IN REVIEW ..................................................................................................................................... 8 REPORT ON 2011 OBJECTIVES ..................................................................................................................... 12 THE YEAR AHEAD: OBJECTIVES FOR 2012 ............................................................................................... 13 2011 SPONSORS ................................................................................................................................................ 14 GOVERNANCE