DOCSLIB.ORG

The Clean Air Act of 1963: Postwar Environmental Politics and the Debate Over Federal Power

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Clean Air Act of 1963: Postwar Environmental Politics and the Debate Over Federal Power Digital Commons @ Georgia Law Scholarly Works Faculty Scholarship 7-1-2021 The Clean Air Act of 1963: Postwar Environmental Politics and the Debate Over Federal Power Adam D. Orford The Clean Air Act of 1963: Postwar Environmental Politics and the Debate Over Federal Power Adam D. Orford* ABSTRACT This Article explores the development of the Clean Air Act of 1963, the first law to allow the federal government to fight air pollution rather than study it. The Article focuses on the postwar years (1945-1963) and explores the rise of public health medical research, cooperative federalism, and the desire to harness the powers of the federal government for domestic social improvement, as key precursors to environmental law. It examines the origins of the idea that the federal government should "do something" about air pollution, and how that idea was translated, through drafting, lobbying, politicking, hearings, debate, influence, and votes, into a new commitment to a national program to end air pollution in the United States. In addition to presenting new perspectives on this understudied period in the development of environmental law, it is hoped that this work will shed some light on the nature of political opposition to environmental regulation, which today is one of the greatest challenges to effective pollution control. * Ph.D. Candidate, U.C. Berkeley Energy and Resources Group 2021; MPP/MA (Energy & Resources) U.C. Berkeley 2018, J.D. Columbia 2006. I am grateful to the Energy & Resources Group for the research grant to begin this project, and to the John F. Kennedy Presidential Library and Museum for research funding through the Theodore C. Sorensen Fellowship program. 1 Hastings Environmental Law Journal, Vol. 27, No. 2, Summer 2021 TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT ...................................................................................................... 1 INTRODUCTION............................................................................................3 I. AIR POLLUTION IN THE UNITED STATES IN 1960 ................... 6 A. THE PACE OF CHANGE..........................................................................7 B. RELEVANT IDEOLOGIES, INTERESTS, AND ADVOCACIES .................... 13 i. Postwar Liberalism and Modern Republicanism..........................14 ii. Public Health Institutions and Environmental Concerns .............. 16 iii. Smoke Abatement - Engineering and Irrelevance ....................... 20 iv. The Urban Lobby - Visions of a New Federalism.......................24 v. Conservatives - The Skeptical View ............................................ 27 v i. O ther Interests ............................................................................... 2 9 II. THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE CLEAN AIR ACT OF 1963.......31 A. 1948-1949: DONORA..........................................................................32 B. 1949-1958: EARLY DEBATE ON THE FEDERAL ROLE ......................... 35 C. 1958-1960: THE FLEMMING PROPOSAL .............................................. 43 D. 1961: THE AMA PROPOSALS..............................................................46 i. The Kennedy Administration Weighs In (February, June 1961)..47 ii. Hugh Mields' Contributions (February to November 1961)........49 iii. A Hearing in Birmingham (November 1961)...............................53 E. 1962: WASHINGTON HAPPENS ........................................................... 55 i. The Administration Position (February 1962)..............................55 ii. U rban Affairs (February 1962) ..................................................... 56 iii. The House Consolidated Bill (March to June 1962) .................... 57 iv. Roberts Delays (June to December 1962) .................................... 59 v. The Opposition Emerges (December 1962) ................................. 60 F. 1963: CALLING THE QUESTION .......................................................... 64 i. Voices of the New Year (January and February 1963) ................ 65 ii. The Opposition Speaks (March 1963)..........................................67 iii. The Muskie Treatment (September 1963) .................................... 71 iv. Votes and Passage (July to December 1963)................................72 CONCLUSION - THE BALANCE OF POWER SHIFTS...................74 2 Hastings Environmental Law Journal, Vol. 27, No. 2, Summer 2021 INTRODUCTION On December 11, 1963, the 88th Congress enacted a law "to improve, strengthen, and accelerate programs for the prevention and abatement of air pollution."' Press reports focused on the new law's allocation of $95 million ($800 million today2 ) for federal grants-in-aid to state pollution control programs, and it was typically framed as an incremental extension of the 1955 Air Pollution Control Act, which had piloted federal-state cooperative air pollution research at a smaller scale. Less remarked upon at the time, however, the new law also permitted the U.S. federal government to fight air pollution in American cities for the first time. This new authority - wrapped though it had been inside layer upon layer of procedural safeguards to ensure it would be difficult to use - was recognized both by its authors and by its opponents as a significant expansion of federal power. Only a single newspaper bothered to mention the law's official name: the Clean Air Act of 1963 (the "1963 Act").3 The 1963 Act remains obscure and understudied today,4 existing as it does under the shadow of the comprehensive 1970 amendments that form the foundation of U.S. national air pollution law to this day.s The 1963 Act is recognized as a contributor to the development of state regulatory programs, but otherwise as an ineffective precursor to more modern, 1. Clean Air Act of 1963, Pub. L. 88-206, 77 Stat. 392 (1963) (the "1963 Act") (codified as amended at 42 U.S.C. § 7401 (2020)). 2. All dollar equivalencies calculated using the U.S Inflation Calculator, https://perma.cc/LM6U-RDDK. 3. The short title is found at 1963 Act § 14, 77 Stat. 392, 401. For a typical report on the bill's passage, see Johnson Signs Fund Bill to Help States Fight Air Pollution, APPLETON POST-CRESCENT, Dec. 17, 1963, at 1. Reporters injurisdictions most active in air pollution control did note the enforcement elements. See, e.g., John H. Averill, House Approves Bill Giving US. Broad Smog Authority, THE LOs ANGELES TIMES, Dec. 11, 1963, at 3; Pollution Control Gets Teeth, THE PHILADELPHIA INQUIRER, Dec. 13, 1963, at 34. The one paper to mention the short title (based on searches of newspapers.com and ProQuest) was the Los Angeles Times. Robert C. Toth, U.S. Moves to Combat Increasing Air Pollution: FederalGovernment Given New Powers as Contamination Bill Hits $11 Billion Year, THE LOs ANGELES TIMES, Dec. 22, 1963, at B2. 4. There is very little literature on the 1963 Clean Air Act. The best is Randall P. Ripley, Congress and Clean Air: The Issue ofEnforcement, 1963, in CONGRESS AND URBAN PROBLEMS (1969). However, as discussed infra note 105, Ripley is a challenging source because it contains no citations. Unfortunately, nothing more recent has improved on it. Compare Arthur C. Stern, History of Air Pollution Legislation in the United States, 32 J. AIR POLLUT. CONTROL AssoC. 44-61 (1982). CHRISTOPHER J. BAILEY, CONGRESS AND AIR POLLUTION: ENVIRONMENTAL POLICIES IN THE USA 103-08 (1998). Arnold W. Reitze, Jr., The Legislative History of U.S. Air Pollution Control, 36 HOus. L. REv. 679-741, 689-90 (1999). Christopher D. Ahlers, Origins of the Clean Air Act: A New Interpretation, 45 ENVTL. L. 75-127, 84-94 (2015). WILLLAM H. RODGERS, JR., 1 ENVIRONMENTAL LAW 169- 184 (1986). 5. 42 U.S.C.§§ '7401-7671. 3 Hastings Environmental Law Journal, Vol. 27, No. 2, Summer 2021 successful legislation - that is, in comparison to the 1970 Act and its long decades of subsequent amendments and execution. However, while these comparisons are not unwarranted, this Article argues that they are insufficient, and that the 1963 Act stands on its own as a landmark environmental law, because it overcame the resistance to treating air pollution as a federal problem. It was a "foot in the door" toward a robust national air pollution enforcement program, a signature environmental legislative achievement of the Kennedy Administration, and a surprising outcome in a legislative context that was hostile to the expansion of federal power. To put the 1963 Act into its proper context, this Article proceeds in two Parts: - Part I provides background. Section I.A explores the physical and social trends and circumstances that defined air pollution as a policy problem circa 1960. Section I.B examines the relevant interests involved in air pollution - players in a world pre-dating the words "environmentalist" and "environmentalism" in their modern senses. By the end of Part I, the reader should have a clearer feeling for the world of air pollution politics circa 1960, when it was first suggested that a federal agency should have the authority to clean it up. - Part II describes the development of federal air pollution law, from its genesis through what would become the Clean Air Act of 1963, tracking in detail the bills, advocacy, hearings, and legislative actions that produced the text of the final law. The Part begins by examining the development of federal air pollution control legislation between 1948 and 1958. It then examines the development, from year to year, of the legislative proposals that would eventually form the Clean Air Act of 1963. Throughout the discussion, the Article
Load more

Recommended publications
  • LAW REVMV Volume 25 Fall 1997 Number 1
    NORTHERN KENTUCKY LAW REVMV Volume 25 Fall 1997 Number 1 Natural Resource and Environmental Law Issue ARTICLES Smog, Science & the EPA ............................................... Kevin D. Hill 1 Overview of Brownfield Redevelopment Initiatives: A Renaissance in the Traditional Command and Control Approach to Environmental Protection ................ Philip J. Schworer 29 American Mining Congress v. Army Corps of Engineers:Ignoring Chevron and the Clean Water Act's Broad Purposes ......................... BradfordC. Mank 51 SPECIAL ESSAY Comparative Risk Assessment and Environmental Priorities Projects: A Forum, Not a Formula ........................................ John S. Applegate 71 PRACTITIONER'S GUIDE The Use of Experts in Environmental Litigation: A Practitioner's Guide .................................. Kim K Burke 111 NOTE United States v. Ahmad: What You Don't Know Won't Hurt You. Or Will It? .................. MichaelE.M. Fielman 141 Special Feature Introduction to the Best Petitioner and Respondent Briefs from the Fifth Annual Salmon P. Chase College of Law Environmental Law Moot Court Competition ............................ M. PatiaR. Tabar 163 M oot Court Problem ....................................................................... 165 Best Brief, Petitioner ............................... University of Cincinnati 181 Best Brief, Respondent .............................. University of Wisconsin 209 ARTICLES SMOG, SCIENCE & THE EPA by Kevin D. Hill' The yellow fog that rubs its back upon the window-panes The yellow
    [Show full text]
  • Clean Air (Human Rights) Bill [HL]
    Clean Air (Human Rights) Bill [HL] CONTENTS 1Overview 2 Reviewing and revising the pollutants and limits in Schedules 1 to 4 3 Secretary of State’s duty: assessing air pollutants 4 Secretary of State’s duty: additional provisions 5Environment Agency 6 Committee on Climate Change 7 Local authorities 8 Civil Aviation Authority 9 Highways England 10 Historic England 11 Natural England 12 The establishment of the Citizens’ Commission for Clean Air 13 Judicial review and other legal proceedings 14 Duty to maintain clear air: assessment 15 Duty to maintain clean air: reporting 16 Environmental principles 17 Interpretation 18 Extent, commencement and short title Schedule 1 — Pollutants relating to local and atmospheric pollution Schedule 2 — Indoor air pollutants Schedule 3 — Pollutants causing primarily environmental harm Schedule 4 — Pollutants causing climate change Schedule 5 — The Protocols to the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe’s Convention on Long-Range Transboundary Air Pollution Schedule 6 — The clean air enactments Schedule 7 — Constitution of the Citizens’ Commission for Clean Air HL Bill 17 58/1 Clean Air (Human Rights) Bill [HL] 1 A BILL TO Establish the right to breathe clean air; to require the Secretary of State to achieve and maintain clean air in England and Wales; to involve Public Health England in setting and reviewing pollutants and their limits; to enhance the powers, duties and functions of the Environment Agency, the Committee on Climate Change, local authorities (including port authorities), the Civil Aviation Authority, Highways England, Historic England and Natural England in relation to air pollution; to establish the Citizens’ Commission for Clean Air with powers to institute or intervene in legal proceedings; to require the Secretary of State and the relevant national authorities to apply environmental principles in carrying out their duties under this Act and the clean air enactments; and for connected purposes.
    [Show full text]
  • Tackling Air Pollution in China—What Do We Learn from the Great Smog of 1950S in LONDON
    Sustainability 2014, 6, 5322-5338; doi:10.3390/su6085322 OPEN ACCESS sustainability ISSN 2071-1050 www.mdpi.com/journal/sustainability Article Tackling Air Pollution in China—What do We Learn from the Great Smog of 1950s in LONDON Dongyong Zhang 1,2, Junjuan Liu 1 and Bingjun Li 1,* 1 College of Information and Management Science, Henan Agricultural University, 15 Longzi Lake Campus, Zhengzhou East New District, Zhengzhou, Henan 450046, China; E-Mails: [email protected] (D.Z.); [email protected] (J.L.) 2 Center for International Earth Science Information Network, The Earth Institute, Columbia University, P.O. Box 1000 (61 Route 9W), Palisades, NY 10964, USA * Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mail: [email protected]; Tel.: +86-371-6355-8101. Received: 10 June 2014; in revised form: 21 July 2014 / Accepted: 29 July 2014 / Published: 18 August 2014 Abstract: Since the prolonged, severe smog that blanketed many Chinese cities in first months of 2013, living in smog has become “normal” to most people living in mainland China. This has not only caused serious harm to public health, but also resulted in massive economic losses in many other ways. Tackling the current air pollution has become crucial to China’s long-term economic and social sustainable development. This paper aims to find the causes of the current severe air quality and explore the possible solutions by reviewing the current literature, and by comparing China’s air pollution regulations to that of the post London Killer Smog of 1952, in the United Kingdom (UK).
    [Show full text]
  • Item 3 Glasgow City Council 24Th January 2013 Executive Committee
    Item 3 Glasgow City Council 24th January 2013 Executive Committee Report by Councillor Archie Graham, Depute Leader of the Council Contact: Annemarie O’Donnell, Executive Director of Corporate Services, Ext: 74522 PROPOSAL TO PROMOTE A PRIVATE BILL IN RELATION TO THE BURRELL COLLECTION Purpose of Report: To seek approval from the Executive Committee to promote a private bill in order to lift the restriction on overseas lending of the Burrell Collection. Recommendations: The Executive Committee is asked to: 1. Approve the promotion of a private bill in order to lift the restriction on overseas lending of the Burrell Collection; and 2. Refer this matter to the Council for approval in accordance with Standing Orders and s82 of the Local Government (Scotland ) Act 1973 Ward No(s): Citywide: 9 Local member(s) advised: Yes No consulted: Yes No PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING: Any Ordnance Survey mapping included within this Report is provided by Glasgow City Council under licence from the Ordnance Survey in order to fulfil its public function to make available Council-held public domain information. Persons viewing this mapping should contact Ordnance Survey Copyright for advice where they wish to licence Ordnance Survey mapping/map data for their own use. The OS web site can be found at <http://www.ordnancesurvey.co.uk> " If accessing this Report via the Internet, please note that any mapping is for illustrative purposes only and is not true to any marked scale 1. THE BURRELL COLLECTION 1.1 Sir William Burrell (1861 – 1958) was a Glaswegian shipping magnate who combined his business acumen with collecting art.
    [Show full text]
  • Political Ecology and Environmentalism in Britain
    Political Ecology and Environmentalism in Britain Political Ecology and Environmentalism in Britain Edited by Brendan Prendiville and David Haigron Political Ecology and Environmentalism in Britain Edited by Brendan Prendiville and David Haigron This book first published 2020 Cambridge Scholars Publishing Lady Stephenson Library, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE6 2PA, UK British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Copyright © 2020 by Brendan Prendiville, David Haigron and contributors All rights for this book reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the copyright owner. ISBN (10): 1-5275-4247-5 ISBN (13): 978-1-5275-4247-1 TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Tables and Figures ........................................................................ vii Introduction ................................................................................................ 1 Brendan Prendiville Chapter One .............................................................................................. 17 Political Ecology and Environmentalism in Britain: An Overview Brendan Prendiville Chapter Two ............................................................................................. 49 The Transformation of Climate Politics in the UK Neil Carter Chapter Three ..........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Clean Air Act, 1956: 4 & 5 Eliz
    Clean Air Act, 1956: 4 & 5 Eliz. 2, Part 52, 0108502821, 9780108502828, H.M. Stationery Office, 1956 DOWNLOAD http://bit.ly/1yqZhcQ http://goo.gl/RiYbC http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clean_Air_Act_1956_4__5_Eliz_2_Part_52 DOWNLOAD http://tiny.cc/cITAuJ http://bit.ly/1sAOtoH 1979 Convention on Long-Range Transboundary Air Pollution and, Pages 76-1999 , United Nations. Economic Commission for Europe, 1999, Law, 91 pages. European Environmental Law After Lisbon, J. H. Jans, Hans Vedder, 2012, Law, 560 pages. This leading monograph on European environmental law has been completely updated and revised, taking into account new case law of the Court of Justice, recent environmental. The Polluter-pays Principle Note on the Implementation of the Polluter-pays Principle, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Environment Directorate, 1974, Environmental policy, 6 pages. Kennet and Avon Canal , Geoprojects (Great Britain) Ltd, Jan 1, 1997, Boats and boating, . This tourist map of the Kennet and Avon Canal features the canal corridor at 1:53,750 showing facilities available to the boat user with details of boatyards, boat hire and. Air Pollution by Photochemical Oxidants , Ian Colbeck, A. Robert MacKenzie, 1994, Science, 376 pages. Hardbound. This book gives a detailed description of the observed behaviour of photochemical oxidants, especially ozone, on the urban, regional, and global scales. The volume. Environmental protection law and policy, Frederick R. Anderson, Daniel R. Mandelker, A. Dan Tarlock, Jun 1, 1990, Law, 914 pages. If you're ready to tackle the fundanmental questions surrounding modern environmental law, this comprehensive revision of the classic casebook is your ideal teaching tool. In.
    [Show full text]
  • Clean Air Act 1993
    Clean Air Act 1993 CHAPTER 11 LONDON: HMSO Clean Air Act 1993 CHAPTER 11 IA table showing the derivation of the provisions of this consolidation will be found at the end of this Act. The table has no official status.j ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS PART I DARK SMOKE Section 1. Prohibition of dark smoke from chimneys. 2. Prohibition of dark smoke from industrial or trade premises. 3. Meaning of "dark smoke". PART II SMOKE, GRIT, DUST AND FUMES Installation offurnaces 4. Requirement that new furnaces shall be so far as practicable smokeless. Limits on rate of emission of grit and dust 5. Emission of grit and dust from furnaces. Arrestment plant for furnaces 6. Arrestment plant for new non-domestic furnaces. 7. Exemptions from section 6. 8. Requirement to fit arrestment plant for burning solid fuel in other cases. 9. Appeal to Secretary of State against refusal of approval. Measurement of grit, dust and fumes 10. Measurement of grit, dust and fumes by occupiers. 11. Measurement of grit, dust and fumes by local authorities. 12. Information about furnaces and fuel consumed. Outdoor furnaces 13. Grit and dust from outdoor furnaces, etc. c. 11 Clean Air Act 1993 Height of chimneys Section 14. Height of chimneys for furnaces. 15. Applications for approval of height of chimneys of furnaces. 16. Height of other chimneys. Smoke nuisances in Scotland 17. Abatement of smoke nuisances in Scotland. PART III SMOKE CONTROL AREAS Creation of smoke control areas 18. Declaration of smoke control area by local authority. 19. Power of Secretary of State to require creation of smoke control areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Copyrighted Material
    BLUK116-Cooke May 18, 2009 14:32 Index 1APP 158, 162, 166 areas: surface area of a sphere 92 abatement 209, 210 Article 7 of Town and Country Planning Abraham Derby II 131 (General Development Procedure) Order Abraham Derby III 131 1995 160 abstractor 84 Articles of Agreement 9, 212 accounts department 6, 53, 118, 183 Artisans Dwelling Act 1875 137 actual sum 185 Arup Associates 195, 196, 197, 200, 201, 204, Agreement, The 2, 3, 4, 9, 11, 23, 60, 61, 62, 207, 208, 211, 217 86, 102, 110, 116, 165, 166, 172, 174, 182, 196, Ashlar buildings 35, 37, 39, 41 206, 210, 211, 212, 213, 214, 243 Asta Developments 25, 114, 247, 251, 254 Agricultural Holding Certificate 161 Asta Powerproject 247, 248, 251, 254 aircrete 26, 36, 86, 177 all in rates 88, 89 Bage, Charles 133 all risks cover 104 banksman 240 all risks insurance 104, 212 bar charts 110, 111, 117, 249, 252, all-in hourly rate 88 Bazalgette, Joseph 136, 137 all-in rate 88, 89 bench joiner 184, 189 allocations manager 252 bespoke contracts 108, 206, 211 appendix 10, 212 Better Places to Live by Design 157 Application for Outline Planning Permission bid 84, 85, 87, 195, 198, 213 With Some Matters Reserved 157 bills of quantities 215, 216 appraisal 61, 62, 65, 162, 163 Biodiversity and Geological Conservation Approved Code of Practice (ACoP) 242 166 approved documents 28, 149, 167, 177 biofuel boilers 204, 205 approved inspectors 175 BODMAS [BIDMAS] 91 approximate costing 20, 60, 61, 62, 184, 213, breeze blocks 36 215, 216, 217 brickwork 10, 25, 32, 35, 77, 79, 89, 92, 93, approximate sum 185 110, 112, 119, 135 Architect’s Act 1997 14 British Board of Agreement (BBA) 149, 150, Architect’s Instruction (AI) 120 170, 171 Architects Registration Board [ARB] 14 British Institute of Architectural Technologists architectural technologist 14, 18, 58, 63 [BIAT] 63 area dimensionCOPYRIGHTEDBritish MATERIAL Land Plc.
    [Show full text]
  • The Creation of Enemies: Investigating Conservative Environmental Polarization, 1945-1981
    The Creation of Enemies: Investigating Conservative Environmental Polarization, 1945-1981 by Adam Duane Orford A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Energy and Resources in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in Charge: Professor Daniel Kammen, Co-Chair Professor Katherine O’Neill, Co-Chair Professor Alastair Iles Professor Rebecca McLennan Spring 2021 © 2021 Adam Duane Orford all rights reserved Abstract The Creation of Enemies: Investigating Conservative Environmental Polarization, 1945-1981 by Adam Duane Orford Doctor of Philosophy in Energy and Resources University of California, Berkeley Professors Daniel Kammen and Katherine O’Neill, Co-Chairs This Dissertation examines the history of the conservative relationship with environmentalism in the United States between 1945 and 1981. In response to recent calls to bring the histories of U.S. political conservatism and environmentalism into conversation with each other, it investigates postwar environmental political history through the lens of partisan and ideological polarization and generates a research agenda for the field. It then contributes three new studies in conservative environmental politics: an analysis of the environmental rhetoric of a national business magazine; the legislative history of the first law to extend the power of the federal government to fight air pollution; and a history of the conservative response to Earth Day. It concludes that conservative opposition to environmentalism in the United States has been both ideological and situational. 1 Acknowledgements My most profound gratitude… To my parents, who always encouraged me to pursue my passions; To my wife, Dax, who knows what it takes to write a dissertation (I love you); And to all of the many people I have learned from at U.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Sixty Years Since the 1956 Clean Air Act: Are We Really Doing Enough to Reduce Air Pollution?
    The International Network of Environmental Forensics Bulletin 2016 – volume 1 Sixty years since the 1956 Clean Air Act: are we really doing enough to reduce air pollution? Ben Williams (Air Quality Management Resource Centre, University of the West of England, Bristol, England) In the year that the UK’s Clean Air Act Century air pollution as a result of coal smoke turns sixty, the head of public health at the forced Queen Eleanor to leave Nottingham and in World Health Organisation (WHO) declared the early 14th Century the burning of sea-coal by air pollution as a global health emergency craftsmen became prohibited in London. [1]. Globally, air pollution is responsible for 7 The principles of air pollution management were million premature deaths per year [2], set out by John Evelyn in the 17th Century. In equivalent to 1 in 8 of all recorded deaths. Fumifugium, 1661 [7], Evelyn proposed three Across Europe, 400,000 deaths were tenets of air quality management that still apply attributed to air pollution in 2012, whilst in to this day: the introduction of smokeless fuels, the UK over 50,000 deaths per year are due the substitution of ‘dirty’ fuels for cleaner ones to a combination of gaseous (nitrogen and the removal of polluting sources away from receptors. dioxide and ozone) and particulate matter (PM) air pollution [3]. On a local authority During the industrial revolution air pollution was scale, approximately 5% of all deaths in considered an inescapable and often welcome England and Wales are linked to air sign of economic virility. In 18th century pollution, although, based purely on PM, this Manchester, the first industrialised city, a is recognised as an underestimate [4].
    [Show full text]
  • Judicial Interpretations of the General Water Pollution Offences: an Internal Coherence Perspective
    JUDICIAL INTERPRETATIONS OF THE GENERAL WATER POLLUTION OFFENCES: AN INTERNAL COHERENCE PERSPECTIVE A thesis submitted to the University of Manchester for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy In the Faculty of Humanities 2019 MUNIRA PATEL SCHOOL OF LAW CONTENT PAGE (84,878 words) Contents CONTENT PAGE ....................................................................................................................................... 2 ABSTRACT ................................................................................................................................................ 6 DECLARATION .......................................................................................................................................... 8 COPYRIGHT STATEMENT ......................................................................................................................... 8 ACKNOWLEDGMENT ............................................................................................................................. 10 CHAPTER ONE: INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................. 13 1.1 Introduction..................................................................................................................................... 13 1.2 The Evolution of Environmental and Water Law ............................................................................. 14 1.2.1 European Environmental and Water Law and Policy ..................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Cr221-50 Years of Aq Conservation
    Fifty years of air quality conservation ooking back over 50 years, it is clear why attention published his seminal book, Atmospheric Diffusion: The As important today Lto air quality and its relationship with emissions has Dispersion of Windborne Material from Industrial and been, and still is, one of the leading activities carried out other Sources. In 1968 large-scale experiments were as it was by CONCAWE for its members. The concerns of the being carried out in the USA to determine input data for 50 years ago 1960s, addressed by enormous efforts over the follow- these types of stack models (which remained in use well ing 50 years, are centre stage again in the 2013 ‘Year into the 2000s). In 1968, the first revision of the UK of Air’ which re-focuses on urban air quality as it is Clean Air Act required tall stacks to ensure the ‘safe dis- affected by emissions from domestic, small industry, persion’ of industrial pollutants away from local sources. commercial and transport sources. The main difference is that now we deal in reducing residual risk as we Europe was also taking common action on environmen- move towards a policy target of ‘zero’ impact to human tal matters. The first European Action Programme health and the environment, whereas 50 years ago the started in 1973 and set the basis for what is now known need was to address visible impacts. as ‘sustainable development’. It recommended actions on the control of air and water pollution. The ‘polluter In 1963, air quality was very much poorer for many than pays’ principle was set out in 1974 in the Environmental it is now, especially in towns and cities.
    [Show full text]