DOCSLIB.ORG

QFT II Solution 7

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
QFT II Solution 7 QFT II FS 2019 Solution 7. Prof. M. Grazzini Exercise 1. Remaining Feynman rules for QCD Starting from the full QCD-Lagrangian with gauge-fixing and Fadeev-Popov term, 1 1 2 L = − F a F a,µν + ¯iD= − m − @µAa − c¯a@µDabcb ; (1) QCD 4 µν 2ξ µ µ find the terms of Lint contributing to the gluon-quark and the gluon-ghost vertices and derive the corre- sponding Feynman rules using path-integral methods. Solution. The first term, the pure Yang-Mills Lagrangian, only contributes to the gluon self- interaction we calculated on sheet 6. The gauge fixing term is quadratic in the fields and will therefore not contribute to any interaction. We are left with the second and fourth term, and the corresponding contributions to Lint will become obvious once we write out the covariant derivatives. For the quarks (fundamental representation) we have a a Dµ i = (@µδij − igtijAµ) j ; (S.1) and for the ghosts (adjoint representation) ab b ab abc c b Dµ c = (@µδ − gf Aµ)c : (S.2) With this we find gqq¯ ¯ a a gcc¯ abc µ a c b Lint = g itijA= j ; Lint = −gf (@ c¯ )Aµc ; (S.3) where we shifted the derivative to act on the anti-ghost by means of partial integration. To derive the vertices we expand the exponential in a a a Z[Jµ; a¯i; ai; η¯ ; η ] Z 4 1 δ 1 δ 1 δ 1 δ 1 δ a a a = N exp i d zLint a ; ; − ; a ; − a Z0[Jµ; a¯i; ai; η¯ ; η ] (S.4) i δJµ i δa¯i i δai i δη¯ i δη a a a to first order, as usual.a ¯i; ai are the sources for the quarks,η ¯ ; η for the ghosts and Jµ for the gluon-field. 1 Exercise 2. Gauge fixing in the path integral (a) Consider the action for pure electrodynamics Z 1 S = d4x − F F µν : ED 4 µν Perform the gauge fixing via the Faddeev{Popov method, using the non-linear gauge condition 1 G[A; Ω] = @ Aµ + ζA Aµ − Ω: µ 2 µ Invert the kinetic operators that appear in the action to find the propagators for the photon field and for the ghost field. Is the ghost field decoupled in this gauge? Show that in the limit ζ ! 0 the modified Lorenz gauge with gauge-fixing parameter ξ is restored. (b) Consider the action for pure Yang{Mills theory Z 1 S = d4x − F a F a µν : YM 4 µν Perform the gauge fixing via the Faddeev{Popov method using the axial gauge condition along a fixed four-vector nµ a µ a a G[A; Ω] = n Aµ − Ω : Invert the kinetic operators that appear in the action to find the propagators for the ghost field and for the gluon field. Under which condition do ghosts decouple from gluon fields in this gauge? How can this be exploited in practice? Solution. Recycled from FS17, S6E1. Original author: Simone Lionetti (a) The gauge-fixing term is 1 G[A] = @ Aµ + ζA Aµ − Ω; µ 2 µ whose gauge variation is, with δAµ = @µα, µ µ µ δG[A] = @µ@ α + ζAµ@ α = (@µ + ζAµ)@ α: We can express the functional determinant we get as δG[A] Z Z det = DcDc¯exp −i dx c¯@2 + ζA @µc δα µ in terms of the ghost/anti-ghost fields c=c¯. The kinetic term of the action is left untouched, therefore the photon propagator is again 1 GA (p) = g − (1 − ξ)p p =p2; µν p2 − i µν µ ν whereas the ghost propagator is trivially 1 Ggh(p) = : p2 − i 5 The Lagrangian that is obtained from the given gauge condition reads 0 LED = LED + Lgf + Lgh; 1 L0 = − F F µν; ED 4 µν 1 1 L = − [@ Aµ + ζA Aµ]2; gf 2ξ µ 2 µ 2 µ Lgh =c ¯(@ + ζAµ@ )c: (S.5) Note that this choice introduces gauge-dependent cubic and quartic photon couplings, which are an artefact of gauge fixing and will be exactly cancelled by ghost contributions. For every ζ 6= 0 ghosts do not decouple from the gauge field, and are in fact needed for the described cancellation to take place; in the limit ζ ! 0 their interaction with Aµ is negligible, only the ghost kinetic term survives and the c,c ¯ fields may be safely integrated out. We then recover the modified Lorenz gauge with gauge-fixing parameter ξ (also known as Rξ-gauge). (b) The gauge-fixing functional and Lagrangian are 1 G[A]a = nµAa ; L = − (nµAa )2: µ gf 2ξ µ a The gauge transformation of the gluon field Aµ is a a a b c δAµ = @µα + gfbc Aµα ; therefore we can write the functional determinant as δG[A] Z Z det = DcDc¯exp −i dx c¯anµ(δ @ + gf Ac )cb : δα ab µ abc µ The kinetic term for the ghost field leads to the propagator δ Ggh(p) = ab : ab n · p Finding the appropriate i prescription for denominators that are linear in p is a nontrivial problem (see e.g. Pokorski p. 132{133) and depends on whether n is space-like, light-like or time-like: the issue is therefore ignored in these solutions. Switching to momentum space, the kinetic term for the gluon field is Z d4p 1 − Aa (−p)KµνAb (p); (2π)4 2 µ ab ν where the kinetic operator reads µν 2 −1 Kab = δab gµνp − pµpν + ξ nµnν : We now look for a Green function of the kinetic operator, which in momentum space is defined by µν bc c µ Kab Gνρ = δaδρ : ab ab The colour structure is trivial, Gµν = δ Gµν. For the Lorentz part we can write down the most general tensor structure as Gρν = Gggρν + Gpppρpν + Gnnnρnν + Gnpnρpν + Gpnpρnν; 6 2 2 where Gg, Gpp, Gnn, Gnp and Gpn are functions of the Lorentz scalars p , n and n · p that we want to determine. The left hand side of equation ((b)) then becomes ρν 2 −1 ρν ρ ν ρ ν ρ ν ρ ν KµρG = (gµρp − pµpρ + ξ nµnρ)(Ggg + Gppp p + Gnnn n + Gnpn p + Gpnp n ) (S.6) 2 ν ν ν ν ν = p Ggδµ + Gpppµp + Gnnnµn + Gnpnµp + Gpnpµn ν 2 ν ν ν 2 ν − Ggpµp + Gppp pµp + Gnn(n · p)pµn + Gnp(n · p)pµp + Gpnp pµn −1 ν ν 2 ν 2 ν ν + ξ Ggnµn + Gpp(n · p)nµp + Gnnn nµn + Gnpn nµp + Gpn(n · p)nµn (S.7) 2 ν ν = fGgp gδµ − fGg + Gnp(n · p)gpµp 2 −1 2 ν + fGnnp + ξ [Gg + Gnnn + Gpn(n · p)]gnµn 2 −1 2 ν ν + fp Gnp + ξ [Gpp(n · p) + Gnpn ]gnµp − fGnn(n · p)gpµn : (S.8) ρ Requiring that this expression be equal to δµ for any vectors p and n, i.e. setting the coefficients of the first tensor structure in curly brackets to 1 and all others to zero, yields 5 conditions for 5 unknowns. We thus find 1 ξp2 + n2 1 G = ;G = − ;G = G = − ;G = 0; g p2 pp (n · p)2p2 np pn (n · p)p2 nn which gives the propagator in axial gauge δab p p p n + p n Gab = g − (ξp2 + n2) µ ν − µ ν ν µ : µν p2 µν (n · p)2 (n · p) Note that, because the kinetic operator is symmetric under the exchange of its Lorentz indices, its inverse retains this property as confirmed by Gnp = Gpn. We could have restricted the search of its inverse to this type of functions from the start: in this case we would have found 5 equations for 4 unknowns, one of which would have been just a consistency check. We observe that in the limit ξ ! 0 the gauge is fixed by the condition µ a n Aµ = 0; µν and the propagator inherits this property as nµGab = 0. In this limit, often one chooses a light-like reference vector, n2 = 0, so that the pµpν term in the propagator drops completely and many calculations become easier. Concerning the decoupling of ghosts, the only term µ a b c µ a of interaction for the ghosts is n fabcc¯ Aµc which is zero when n Aµ = 0 i.e. in the limit that was just considered. The presence of (n · p) in denominators, however, makes calculations very tough to manage beyond tree level, to the point that it would seem impossible to exploit the axial gauge. Luckily it is possible to consistently pick a different gauge for internal and external particles. One may thus choose axial gauge for external legs, which does not produce any nasty propagator in amplitude calculations, and use a different gauge (e.g. Feynman) for all internal lines. While such a procedure does not get rid of ghosts in loops, it allows at least to forget about diagrams with initial or final state ghosts. 7.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Quantum Gravity and the Cosmological Constant Problem
    Quantum Gravity and the Cosmological Constant Problem J. W. Moffat Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics, Waterloo, Ontario N2L 2Y5, Canada and Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario N2L 3G1, Canada October 15, 2018 Abstract A finite and unitary nonlocal formulation of quantum gravity is applied to the cosmological constant problem. The entire functions in momentum space at the graviton-standard model particle loop vertices generate an exponential suppression of the vacuum density and the cosmological constant to produce agreement with their observational bounds. 1 Introduction A nonlocal quantum field theory and quantum gravity theory has been formulated that leads to a finite, unitary and locally gauge invariant theory [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14]. For quantum gravity the finiteness of quantum loops avoids the problem of the non-renormalizabilty of local quantum gravity [15, 16]. The finiteness of the nonlocal quantum field theory draws from the fact that factors of exp[ (p2)/Λ2] are attached to propagators which suppress any ultraviolet divergences in Euclidean momentum space,K where Λ is an energy scale factor. An important feature of the field theory is that only the quantum loop graphs have nonlocal properties; the classical tree graph theory retains full causal and local behavior. Consider first the 4-dimensional spacetime to be approximately flat Minkowski spacetime. Let us denote by f a generic local field and write the standard local Lagrangian as [f]= [f]+ [f], (1) L LF LI where and denote the free part and the interaction part of the action, respectively, and LF LI arXiv:1407.2086v1 [gr-qc] 7 Jul 2014 1 [f]= f f .
    [Show full text]
  • QCD Theory 6Em2pt Formation of Quark-Gluon Plasma In
    QCD theory Formation of quark-gluon plasma in QCD T. Lappi University of Jyvaskyl¨ a,¨ Finland Particle physics day, Helsinki, October 2017 1/16 Outline I Heavy ion collision: big picture I Initial state: small-x gluons I Production of particles in weak coupling: gluon saturation I 2 ways of understanding glue I Counting particles I Measuring gluon field I For practical phenomenology: add geometry 2/16 A heavy ion event at the LHC How does one understand what happened here? 3/16 Concentrate here on the earliest stage Heavy ion collision in spacetime The purpose in heavy ion collisions: to create QCD matter, i.e. system that is large and lives long compared to the microscopic scale 1 1 t L T > 200MeV T T t freezefreezeout out hadronshadron in eq. gas gluonsquark-gluon & quarks in eq. plasma gluonsnonequilibrium & quarks out of eq. quarks, gluons colorstrong fields fields z (beam axis) 4/16 Heavy ion collision in spacetime The purpose in heavy ion collisions: to create QCD matter, i.e. system that is large and lives long compared to the microscopic scale 1 1 t L T > 200MeV T T t freezefreezeout out hadronshadron in eq. gas gluonsquark-gluon & quarks in eq. plasma gluonsnonequilibrium & quarks out of eq. quarks, gluons colorstrong fields fields z (beam axis) Concentrate here on the earliest stage 4/16 Color charge I Charge has cloud of gluons I But now: gluons are source of new gluons: cascade dN !−1−O(αs) d! ∼ Cascade of gluons Electric charge I At rest: Coulomb electric field I Moving at high velocity: Coulomb field is cloud of photons
    [Show full text]
  • The Positons of the Three Quarks Composing the Proton Are Illustrated
    The posi1ons of the three quarks composing the proton are illustrated by the colored spheres. The surface plot illustrates the reduc1on of the vacuum ac1on density in a plane passing through the centers of the quarks. The vector field illustrates the gradient of this reduc1on. The posi1ons in space where the vacuum ac1on is maximally expelled from the interior of the proton are also illustrated by the tube-like structures, exposing the presence of flux tubes. a key point of interest is the distance at which the flux-tube formaon occurs. The animaon indicates that the transi1on to flux-tube formaon occurs when the distance of the quarks from the center of the triangle is greater than 0.5 fm. again, the diameter of the flux tubes remains approximately constant as the quarks move to large separaons. • Three quarks indicated by red, green and blue spheres (lower leb) are localized by the gluon field. • a quark-an1quark pair created from the gluon field is illustrated by the green-an1green (magenta) quark pair on the right. These quark pairs give rise to a meson cloud around the proton. hEp://www.physics.adelaide.edu.au/theory/staff/leinweber/VisualQCD/Nobel/index.html Nucl. Phys. A750, 84 (2005) 1000000 QCD mass 100000 Higgs mass 10000 1000 100 Mass (MeV) 10 1 u d s c b t GeV HOW does the rest of the proton mass arise? HOW does the rest of the proton spin (magnetic moment,…), arise? Mass from nothing Dyson-Schwinger and Lattice QCD It is known that the dynamical chiral symmetry breaking; namely, the generation of mass from nothing, does take place in QCD.
    [Show full text]
  • Gauge-Fixing Degeneracies and Confinement in Non-Abelian Gauge Theories
    PH YSICAL RKVIE% 0 VOLUME 17, NUMBER 4 15 FEBRUARY 1978 Gauge-fixing degeneracies and confinement in non-Abelian gauge theories Carl M. Bender Department of I'hysics, 8'ashington University, St. Louis, Missouri 63130 Tohru Eguchi Stanford Linear Accelerator Center, Stanford, California 94305 Heinz Pagels The Rockefeller University, New York, N. Y. 10021 (Received 28 September 1977) Following several suggestions of Gribov we have examined the problem of gauge-fixing degeneracies in non- Abelian gauge theories. First we modify the usual Faddeev-Popov prescription to take gauge-fixing degeneracies into account. We obtain a formal expression for the generating functional which is invariant under finite gauge transformations and which counts gauge-equivalent orbits only once. Next we examine the instantaneous Coulomb interaction in the canonical formalism with the Coulomb-gauge condition. We find that the spectrum of the Coulomb Green's function in an external monopole-hke field configuration has an accumulation of negative-energy bound states at E = 0. Using semiclassical methods we show that this accumulation phenomenon, which is closely linked with gauge-fixing degeneracies, modifies the usual Coulomb propagator from (k) ' to Iki ' for small )k[. This confinement behavior depends only on the long-range behavior of the field configuration. We thereby demonstrate the conjectured confinement property of non-Abelian gauge theories in the Coulomb gauge. I. INTRODUCTION lution to the theory. The failure of the Borel sum to define the theory and gauge-fixing degeneracy It has recently been observed by Gribov' that in are correlated phenomena. non-Abelian gauge theories, in contrast with Abe- In this article we examine the gauge-fixing de- lian theories, standard gauge-fixing conditions of generacy further.
    [Show full text]
  • Gauge Symmetry Breaking in Gauge Theories---In Search of Clarification
    Gauge Symmetry Breaking in Gauge Theories—In Search of Clarification Simon Friederich [email protected] Universit¨at Wuppertal, Fachbereich C – Mathematik und Naturwissenschaften, Gaußstr. 20, D-42119 Wuppertal, Germany Abstract: The paper investigates the spontaneous breaking of gauge sym- metries in gauge theories from a philosophical angle, taking into account the fact that the notion of a spontaneously broken local gauge symmetry, though widely employed in textbook expositions of the Higgs mechanism, is not supported by our leading theoretical frameworks of gauge quantum the- ories. In the context of lattice gauge theory, the statement that local gauge symmetry cannot be spontaneously broken can even be made rigorous in the form of Elitzur’s theorem. Nevertheless, gauge symmetry breaking does occur in gauge quantum field theories in the form of the breaking of remnant subgroups of the original local gauge group under which the theories typi- cally remain invariant after gauge fixing. The paper discusses the relation between these instances of symmetry breaking and phase transitions and draws some more general conclusions for the philosophical interpretation of gauge symmetries and their breaking. 1 Introduction The interpretation of symmetries and symmetry breaking has been recog- nized as a central topic in the philosophy of science in recent years. Gauge symmetries, in particular, have attracted a considerable amount of inter- arXiv:1107.4664v2 [physics.hist-ph] 5 Aug 2012 est due to the central role they play in our most successful theories of the fundamental constituents of nature. The standard model of elementary par- ticle physics, for instance, is formulated in terms of gauge symmetry, and so are its most discussed extensions.
    [Show full text]
  • Operator Gauge Symmetry in QED
    Symmetry, Integrability and Geometry: Methods and Applications Vol. 2 (2006), Paper 013, 7 pages Operator Gauge Symmetry in QED Siamak KHADEMI † and Sadollah NASIRI †‡ † Department of Physics, Zanjan University, P.O. Box 313, Zanjan, Iran E-mail: [email protected] URL: http://www.znu.ac.ir/Members/khademi.htm ‡ Institute for Advanced Studies in Basic Sciences, IASBS, Zanjan, Iran E-mail: [email protected] Received October 09, 2005, in final form January 17, 2006; Published online January 30, 2006 Original article is available at http://www.emis.de/journals/SIGMA/2006/Paper013/ Abstract. In this paper, operator gauge transformation, first introduced by Kobe, is applied to Maxwell’s equations and continuity equation in QED. The gauge invariance is satisfied after quantization of electromagnetic fields. Inherent nonlinearity in Maxwell’s equations is obtained as a direct result due to the nonlinearity of the operator gauge trans- formations. The operator gauge invariant Maxwell’s equations and corresponding charge conservation are obtained by defining the generalized derivatives of the f irst and second kinds. Conservation laws for the real and virtual charges are obtained too. The additional terms in the field strength tensor are interpreted as electric and magnetic polarization of the vacuum. Key words: gauge transformation; Maxwell’s equations; electromagnetic fields 2000 Mathematics Subject Classification: 81V80; 78A25 1 Introduction Conserved quantities of a system are direct consequences of symmetries inherent in the system. Therefore, symmetries are fundamental properties of any dynamical system [1, 2, 3]. For a sys- tem of electric charges an important quantity that is always expected to be conserved is the total charge.
    [Show full text]
  • Avoiding Gauge Ambiguities in Cavity Quantum Electrodynamics Dominic M
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Avoiding gauge ambiguities in cavity quantum electrodynamics Dominic M. Rouse1*, Brendon W. Lovett1, Erik M. Gauger2 & Niclas Westerberg2,3* Systems of interacting charges and felds are ubiquitous in physics. Recently, it has been shown that Hamiltonians derived using diferent gauges can yield diferent physical results when matter degrees of freedom are truncated to a few low-lying energy eigenstates. This efect is particularly prominent in the ultra-strong coupling regime. Such ambiguities arise because transformations reshufe the partition between light and matter degrees of freedom and so level truncation is a gauge dependent approximation. To avoid this gauge ambiguity, we redefne the electromagnetic felds in terms of potentials for which the resulting canonical momenta and Hamiltonian are explicitly unchanged by the gauge choice of this theory. Instead the light/matter partition is assigned by the intuitive choice of separating an electric feld between displacement and polarisation contributions. This approach is an attractive choice in typical cavity quantum electrodynamics situations. Te gauge invariance of quantum electrodynamics (QED) is fundamental to the theory and can be used to greatly simplify calculations1–8. Of course, gauge invariance implies that physical observables are the same in all gauges despite superfcial diferences in the mathematics. However, it has recently been shown that the invariance is lost in the strong light/matter coupling regime if the matter degrees of freedom are treated as quantum systems with a fxed number of energy levels8–14, including the commonly used two-level truncation (2LT). At the origin of this is the role of gauge transformations (GTs) in deciding the partition between the light and matter degrees of freedom, even if the primary role of gauge freedom is to enforce Gauss’s law.
    [Show full text]
  • Modern Methods of Quantum Chromodynamics
    Modern Methods of Quantum Chromodynamics Christian Schwinn Albert-Ludwigs-Universit¨atFreiburg, Physikalisches Institut D-79104 Freiburg, Germany Winter-Semester 2014/15 Draft: March 30, 2015 http://www.tep.physik.uni-freiburg.de/lectures/QCD-WS-14 2 Contents 1 Introduction 9 Hadrons and quarks . .9 QFT and QED . .9 QCD: theory of quarks and gluons . .9 QCD and LHC physics . 10 Multi-parton scattering amplitudes . 10 NLO calculations . 11 Remarks on the lecture . 11 I Parton Model and QCD 13 2 Quarks and colour 15 2.1 Hadrons and quarks . 15 Hadrons and the strong interactions . 15 Quark Model . 15 2.2 Parton Model . 16 Deep inelastic scattering . 16 Parton distribution functions . 18 2.3 Colour degree of freedom . 19 Postulate of colour quantum number . 19 Colour-SU(3).............................. 20 Confinement . 20 Evidence of colour: e+e− ! hadrons . 21 2.4 Towards QCD . 22 3 Basics of QFT and QED 25 3.1 Quantum numbers of relativistic particles . 25 3.1.1 Poincar´egroup . 26 3.1.2 Relativistic one-particle states . 27 3.2 Quantum fields . 32 3.2.1 Scalar fields . 32 3.2.2 Spinor fields . 32 3 4 CONTENTS Dirac spinors . 33 Massless spin one-half particles . 34 Spinor products . 35 Quantization . 35 3.2.3 Massless vector bosons . 35 Polarization vectors and gauge invariance . 36 3.3 QED . 37 3.4 Feynman rules . 39 3.4.1 S-matrix and Cross section . 39 S-matrix . 39 Poincar´einvariance of the S-matrix . 40 T -matrix and scattering amplitude . 41 Unitarity of the S-matrix . 41 Cross section .
    [Show full text]
  • The Center Symmetry and Its Spontaneous Breakdown at High Temperatures
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by CERN Document Server THE CENTER SYMMETRY AND ITS SPONTANEOUS BREAKDOWN AT HIGH TEMPERATURES KIERAN HOLLAND Institute for Theoretical Physics, University of Bern, CH-3012 Bern, Switzerland UWE-JENS WIESE Center for Theoretical Physics, Laboratory for Nuclear Science and Department of Physics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA The Euclidean action of non-Abelian gauge theories with adjoint dynamical charges (gluons or gluinos) at non-zero temperature T is invariant against topologically non-trivial gauge transformations in the ZZ(N)c center of the SU(N) gauge group. The Polyakov loop measures the free energy of fundamental static charges (in- finitely heavy test quarks) and is an order parameter for the spontaneous break- down of the center symmetry. In SU(N) Yang-Mills theory the ZZ(N)c symmetry is unbroken in the low-temperature confined phase and spontaneously broken in the high-temperature deconfined phase. In 4-dimensional SU(2) Yang-Mills the- ory the deconfinement phase transition is of second order and is in the universality class of the 3-dimensional Ising model. In the SU(3) theory, on the other hand, the transition is first order and its bulk physics is not universal. When a chemical potential µ is used to generate a non-zero baryon density of test quarks, the first order deconfinement transition line extends into the (µ, T )-plane. It terminates at a critical endpoint which also is in the universality class of the 3-dimensional Ising model. At a first order phase transition the confined and deconfined phases coexist and are separated by confined-deconfined interfaces.
    [Show full text]
  • The Confinement Problem in Lattice Gauge Theory
    The Confinement Problem in Lattice Gauge Theory J. Greensite 1,2 1Physics and Astronomy Department San Francisco State University San Francisco, CA 94132 USA 2Theory Group, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Berkeley, CA 94720 USA February 1, 2008 Abstract I review investigations of the quark confinement mechanism that have been carried out in the framework of SU(N) lattice gauge theory. The special role of ZN center symmetry is emphasized. 1 Introduction When the quark model of hadrons was first introduced by Gell-Mann and Zweig in 1964, an obvious question was “where are the quarks?”. At the time, one could respond that the arXiv:hep-lat/0301023v2 5 Mar 2003 quark model was simply a useful scheme for classifying hadrons, and the notion of quarks as actual particles need not be taken seriously. But the absence of isolated quark states became a much more urgent issue with the successes of the quark-parton model, and the introduction, in 1972, of quantum chromodynamics as a fundamental theory of hadronic physics [1]. It was then necessary to suppose that, somehow or other, the dynamics of the gluon sector of QCD contrives to eliminate free quark states from the spectrum. Today almost no one seriously doubts that quantum chromodynamics confines quarks. Following many theoretical suggestions in the late 1970’s about how quark confinement might come about, it was finally the computer simulations of QCD, initiated by Creutz [2] in 1980, that persuaded most skeptics. Quark confinement is now an old and familiar idea, routinely incorporated into the standard model and all its proposed extensions, and the focus of particle phenomenology shifted long ago to other issues.
    [Show full text]
  • 8 Non-Abelian Gauge Theory: Perturbative Quantization
    8 Non-Abelian Gauge Theory: Perturbative Quantization We’re now ready to consider the quantum theory of Yang–Mills. In the first few sec- tions, we’ll treat the path integral formally as an integral over infinite dimensional spaces, without worrying about imposing a regularization. We’ll turn to questions about using renormalization to make sense of these formal integrals in section 8.3. To specify Yang–Mills theory, we had to pick a principal G bundle P M together ! with a connection on P . So our first thought might be to try to define the Yang–Mills r partition function as ? SYM[ ]/~ Z [(M,g), g ] = A e− r (8.1) YM YM D ZA where 1 SYM[ ]= tr(F F ) (8.2) r −2g2 r ^⇤ r YM ZM as before, and is the space of all connections on P . A To understand what this integral might mean, first note that, given any two connections and , the 1-parameter family r r0 ⌧ = ⌧ +(1 ⌧) 0 (8.3) r r − r is also a connection for all ⌧ [0, 1]. For example, you can check that the rhs has the 2 behaviour expected of a connection under any gauge transformation. Thus we can find a 1 path in between any two connections. Since 0 ⌦M (g), we conclude that is an A r r2 1 A infinite dimensional affine space whose tangent space at any point is ⌦M (g), the infinite dimensional space of all g–valued covectors on M. In fact, it’s easy to write down a flat (L2-)metric on using the metric on M: A 2 1 µ⌫ a a d ds = tr(δA δA)= g δAµ δA⌫ pg d x.
    [Show full text]
  • Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking in the Higgs Mechanism
    Spontaneous symmetry breaking in the Higgs mechanism August 2012 Abstract The Higgs mechanism is very powerful: it furnishes a description of the elec- troweak theory in the Standard Model which has a convincing experimental ver- ification. But although the Higgs mechanism had been applied successfully, the conceptual background is not clear. The Higgs mechanism is often presented as spontaneous breaking of a local gauge symmetry. But a local gauge symmetry is rooted in redundancy of description: gauge transformations connect states that cannot be physically distinguished. A gauge symmetry is therefore not a sym- metry of nature, but of our description of nature. The spontaneous breaking of such a symmetry cannot be expected to have physical e↵ects since asymmetries are not reflected in the physics. If spontaneous gauge symmetry breaking cannot have physical e↵ects, this causes conceptual problems for the Higgs mechanism, if taken to be described as spontaneous gauge symmetry breaking. In a gauge invariant theory, gauge fixing is necessary to retrieve the physics from the theory. This means that also in a theory with spontaneous gauge sym- metry breaking, a gauge should be fixed. But gauge fixing itself breaks the gauge symmetry, and thereby obscures the spontaneous breaking of the symmetry. It suggests that spontaneous gauge symmetry breaking is not part of the physics, but an unphysical artifact of the redundancy in description. However, the Higgs mechanism can be formulated in a gauge independent way, without spontaneous symmetry breaking. The same outcome as in the account with spontaneous symmetry breaking is obtained. It is concluded that even though spontaneous gauge symmetry breaking cannot have physical consequences, the Higgs mechanism is not in conceptual danger.
    [Show full text]