DOCSLIB.ORG

Quantum Field Theory II: Gauge Theories

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Quantum Field Theory II: Gauge Theories Quantum Field Theory II: Gauge Theories Lecture in WS 2019/20 at the KFU Graz Axel Maas 2 Contents 1 Introduction 1 2 Path integral 3 2.1 Heuristicintroduction ............................. 3 2.2 Functionalanalysis ............................... 7 2.3 Fermions..................................... 11 2.3.1 Grassmannvariables .......................... 11 2.3.2 Fermionicmatter ............................ 14 2.4 Free particles and generating functionals . .. 15 3 Abelian gauge theories 18 3.1 Globalsymmetries ............................... 18 3.2 ClassicalMaxwelltheory ............................ 21 3.3 QuantizationofMaxwelltheory . 23 3.4 Gauge-dependentcorrelationfunctions . ... 29 3.5 Matterfields................................... 31 4 Classical non-Abelian gauge theories 33 4.1 Somebasicsofgrouptheory .......................... 33 4.2 Orbitstructure ................................. 38 4.2.1 Orbits .................................. 38 4.2.2 (Non-)linear representations . 39 4.2.3 The little group . 40 4.3 Yang-Millstheory................................ 41 4.4 Yang-Millstheoryasgeometry. 45 4.5 Matter, representations, and coupling universality . ..... 47 5 Perturbative quantization of Yang-Mills theory 52 5.1 Quantization .................................. 52 i ii Contents 5.2 BRSTandasymptoticstates. .. .. 55 5.2.1 BRSTsymmetry ............................ 56 5.2.2 Constructingthephysicalstatespace . 59 5.2.2.1 Negative-normstates. 59 5.2.2.2 BRSTalgebra......................... 59 5.2.2.3 Statespace .......................... 61 5.2.2.4 Asymptoticspace....................... 62 5.3 Generalanti-fieldapproach. 65 5.3.1 Structureofgaugesymmetries. 65 5.3.1.1 Yang-Mills type . 65 5.3.1.2 Closure only on-shell . 66 5.3.1.3 Reducible gauge theories . 66 5.3.1.4 Reducibility on-shell . 67 5.3.2 BRSTconstructionrevisited . 67 5.3.3 Observables ............................... 70 5.3.4 Application as gauge-fixing to the path integral . 73 5.3.5 BeyondYang-Millstheory . 75 5.3.6 QuantumMasterEquation. 77 5.4 Ward-Takahashi and Slavnov-Taylor identities . ... 80 5.4.1 Ward-Takahashiidentities . 81 5.4.2 Slavnov-Taylor identities . 83 6 Perturbative treatment 86 6.1 Perturbationtheory............................... 86 6.1.1 Cross-sectionsanddecays . 86 6.1.2 Generalconstruction .......................... 88 6.2 Renormalization................................. 99 6.2.1 Cutoffregularization . .. .. 100 6.2.2 Renormalization prescription . 101 6.2.3 Counter-termstructure. 102 6.2.4 Renormalizationschemes. 105 6.2.5 Renormalizationgroup . 107 6.2.6 Gauge-symmetry-breakingregulators . 110 6.2.7 Dimensional regularization . 112 6.2.8 Lattice and infrared regularization . 114 6.2.9 Compositeoperators . .. .. 116 6.3 Examples of perturbative calculations . 117 Contents iii 6.3.1 Ghostself-energy ............................ 117 6.4 Running couplings, Landau poles, and asymptotic freedom . 122 7 Quantization beyond perturbation theory 125 7.1 The Gribov-Singer ambiguity . 126 7.2 Non-perturbativeBRSTsymmetry . 134 7.3 Gauge-invariance beyond perturbation theory . 138 7.3.1 Abelian gauge theories and the Dirac phase . 139 7.3.2 Composite states as physical degree of freedoms . 141 7.3.3 Gaugeinvarianceasredundancy. 143 7.3.4 Asymptoticstatespace. 143 8 Topology 145 8.1 Topological excitations . 145 8.1.1 Instantonsinquantummechanics . 145 8.1.1.1 Leadingorder......................... 145 8.1.1.2 Higher-ordercorrections . 148 8.1.1.3 Correctionsattwolooporder . 152 8.1.1.4 Instanton-Anti-Instanton interactions . 153 8.1.1.5 Fermions ........................... 153 8.1.2 Yang-Millstheory............................ 154 8.1.2.1 Topology ........................... 154 8.1.2.2 Tunneling . 155 8.1.2.3 θ vacua ............................ 161 8.1.2.4 Tunneling amplitude . 162 8.1.3 Lightfermions.............................. 162 8.2 Other topological excitations . 163 9 Anomalies 165 9.1 Introduction................................... 165 9.2 Globalanomalies ................................ 165 9.2.1 Classicallevel .............................. 166 9.2.2 One-loop violation . 168 9.3 Localanomalies................................. 171 9.3.1 Anomaliesasaquantumeffect. 172 9.3.2 Fullexpressionfortheanomaly . 173 9.3.3 Anomaly cancellation . 176 iv Contents 9.4 Relationtotopology .............................. 177 9.5 Wittenanomalies ................................ 179 9.6 AnomaliesintheBRSTframework . 180 Index 182 Chapter 1 Introduction Gauge theories play a fundamental role in all of modern fundamental physics, but are at the same time enigmatic and challenging. The aim of this lecture is to provide an introduction to their quantum version, in the form of quantum gauge theories. It turns out that a suitable language for these kind of theories is the path integral, which will therefore be introduced in chapter 2. This will be done in a first step for non-gauge theories, as this substantially simplifies it. Gauge theories will be then introduced only in chapter 3, starting with the extension of classical electrodynamics to quantum electro dynamics (QED). QED is a special case of a gauge theory, as it is related to an Abelian structure. The generalization to so-called non- Abelian gauge theories, or Yang-Mills theories, is necessary in particle physics, as they turn out to be a building block of the standard model. In fact, even classical general relativity can be considered to be a gauge theory of related type, and thus will any quantum version of it. Classical Yang-Mills theory will be introduced in chapter 4. Only in chapter 5 will Yang-Mills theory be quantized, as this requires much more techniques due to the non-Abelian nature. In fact, it will only be possible at this stage to quantize the theory at the level of perturbation theory. However, as both in practice and for the sake of concept formation perturbation theory is invaluable, this is anyhow a necessary step. This will be continued in chapter 6, where various perturbative processes will be discussed in detail. As at loop level also in gauge theories divergences arise, this will not be possible without an extensive discussion of this topic. After this, it is possible to delve into gauge theories beyond perturbation theory in chapter 7. This issue is indeed challenging, and not entirely solved until today. This will lead also to questions what are the physical degrees of freedom of gauge theories beyond perturbation theory, and will show that gauge symmetry leads to deeper ontological problems as well. Here QED will be again a role model, as it is possible to spell out both 1 2 the problem and solution in this case explicitly, although at the price of exponentially more complicated calculations. It will then be seen how this problem translates to non-Abelian gauge theories, and where the resolution becomes more involved. This lecture will not be able to cover actual calculations beyond perturbation theory, as the necessary methods are quiet involved, and thus deserve lectures of their own. These are available for lattice gauge theory and for functional methods, although this is not an exhaustive list of possible methods. Some other methods will be encountered in more specialized lectures. Finally, two generically important aspects, topology in chapter 8 and anomalies in chapter 9, will round out the discussion of gauge theories. However, gauge theories are a vast subject, and thus many issues can only be treated superficially. Especially, concrete realizations of gauge theories as theories of, e. g., the strong and weak forces require their own dedicated lecture. There is also a vast literature on gauge theories. In the preparation of this course, the following books and review articles have been used: Peskin et al. “An introduction to quantum field theory”, Perseus B¨ohm et al. “Gauge theories”, Teubner O’Raifertaigh, “Group structure of gauge theories”, Cambridge Weinberg, “The quantum theory of fields I+II”, Cambridge DeWitt, “The global approach to quantum field theory”, Oxford Haag, “Local quantum physics”, Springer Lavelle et al., “Constituent quarks from QCD”, Phys. Rept. 279 Maas, “Gauges bosons at zero and finite temperatures”, Phys. Rept. 524 Maas, “Brout-Englert-Higgs physics”, PPNP 106 Of course, these are my personal choices, and not necessarily the best ones to learn the topic from. Thus, I strongly recommend that any student should test various books and choose the one best suited for their own purposes. Chapter 2 Path integral While gauge theories can be formulated in canonical quantization this is at least cumber- some. As a consequence, it is used little in practice, and not every issue has even been treated in this approach. The path integral is a much more natural framework for gauge theories, which will become especially visible in chapter 5. Thus, it will be used exclusively in this lecture. In this chapter, the basic formulation of the path integral will be briefly reviewed, together with the necessary tools to treat both bosonic and fermionic particles. The application of perturbation theory and the derivation of Feynman rules will be discussed in chapter 6. 2.1 Heuristic introduction The path integral formulation is as axiomatic as is canonical quantization, it cannot be derived. However, it is possible to motivate it. This is done most easily by defining it as a limiting procedure, using a so-called lattice regularization. As the name implies, it works by replacing space-time with a finite lattice of discrete points. This technique will reappear again later
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Quantum Gravity and the Cosmological Constant Problem
    Quantum Gravity and the Cosmological Constant Problem J. W. Moffat Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics, Waterloo, Ontario N2L 2Y5, Canada and Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario N2L 3G1, Canada October 15, 2018 Abstract A finite and unitary nonlocal formulation of quantum gravity is applied to the cosmological constant problem. The entire functions in momentum space at the graviton-standard model particle loop vertices generate an exponential suppression of the vacuum density and the cosmological constant to produce agreement with their observational bounds. 1 Introduction A nonlocal quantum field theory and quantum gravity theory has been formulated that leads to a finite, unitary and locally gauge invariant theory [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14]. For quantum gravity the finiteness of quantum loops avoids the problem of the non-renormalizabilty of local quantum gravity [15, 16]. The finiteness of the nonlocal quantum field theory draws from the fact that factors of exp[ (p2)/Λ2] are attached to propagators which suppress any ultraviolet divergences in Euclidean momentum space,K where Λ is an energy scale factor. An important feature of the field theory is that only the quantum loop graphs have nonlocal properties; the classical tree graph theory retains full causal and local behavior. Consider first the 4-dimensional spacetime to be approximately flat Minkowski spacetime. Let us denote by f a generic local field and write the standard local Lagrangian as [f]= [f]+ [f], (1) L LF LI where and denote the free part and the interaction part of the action, respectively, and LF LI arXiv:1407.2086v1 [gr-qc] 7 Jul 2014 1 [f]= f f .
    [Show full text]
  • Gauge-Fixing Degeneracies and Confinement in Non-Abelian Gauge Theories
    PH YSICAL RKVIE% 0 VOLUME 17, NUMBER 4 15 FEBRUARY 1978 Gauge-fixing degeneracies and confinement in non-Abelian gauge theories Carl M. Bender Department of I'hysics, 8'ashington University, St. Louis, Missouri 63130 Tohru Eguchi Stanford Linear Accelerator Center, Stanford, California 94305 Heinz Pagels The Rockefeller University, New York, N. Y. 10021 (Received 28 September 1977) Following several suggestions of Gribov we have examined the problem of gauge-fixing degeneracies in non- Abelian gauge theories. First we modify the usual Faddeev-Popov prescription to take gauge-fixing degeneracies into account. We obtain a formal expression for the generating functional which is invariant under finite gauge transformations and which counts gauge-equivalent orbits only once. Next we examine the instantaneous Coulomb interaction in the canonical formalism with the Coulomb-gauge condition. We find that the spectrum of the Coulomb Green's function in an external monopole-hke field configuration has an accumulation of negative-energy bound states at E = 0. Using semiclassical methods we show that this accumulation phenomenon, which is closely linked with gauge-fixing degeneracies, modifies the usual Coulomb propagator from (k) ' to Iki ' for small )k[. This confinement behavior depends only on the long-range behavior of the field configuration. We thereby demonstrate the conjectured confinement property of non-Abelian gauge theories in the Coulomb gauge. I. INTRODUCTION lution to the theory. The failure of the Borel sum to define the theory and gauge-fixing degeneracy It has recently been observed by Gribov' that in are correlated phenomena. non-Abelian gauge theories, in contrast with Abe- In this article we examine the gauge-fixing de- lian theories, standard gauge-fixing conditions of generacy further.
    [Show full text]
  • Funaional Integration for Solving the Schroedinger Equation
    Comitato Nazionale Energia Nucleare Funaional Integration for Solving the Schroedinger Equation A. BOVE. G. FANO. A.G. TEOLIS RT/FIMÀ(7$ Comitato Nazionale Energia Nucleare Funaional Integration for Solving the Schroedinger Equation A. BOVE, G.FANO, A.G.TEOLIS 3 1. INTRODUCTION Vesto pervenuto il 2 agosto 197) It ia well-known (aee e.g. tei. [lj - |3| ) that the infinite-diaeneional r«nctional integration ia a powerful tool in all the evolution processes toth of the type of the heat -tanefer or Scbroediager equation. Since the 'ieid of applications of functional integration ia rapidly increasing, it *«*ae dcairahle to study the «stood from the nuaerical point of view, at leaat in siaple caaea. Such a orograa baa been already carried out by Cria* and Scorer (ace ref. |«| - |7| ), via Monte-Carlo techniques. We use extensively an iteration aethod which coneiecs in successively squa£ ing < denaicy matrix (aee Eq.(9)), since in principle ic allows a great accuracy. This aetbod was used only tarely before (aee ref. |4| ). Fur- chersjore we give an catiaate of che error (e«e Eqs. (U),(26)) boch in Che caaa of Wiener and unleabeck-Ometein integral. Contrary to the cur­ rent opinion (aae ref. |13| ), we find that the last integral ia too sen­ sitive to the choice of the parameter appearing in the haraonic oscilla­ tor can, in order to be useful except in particular caaea. In this paper we study the one-particle spherically sysssetric case; an application to the three nucleon probUa is in progress (sea ref. |U| ). St»wp«wirìf^m<'oUN)p^woMG>miutoN«i»OMtop«fl'Ht>p>i«Wi*faif»,Piijl(Mi^fcri \ptt,mt><r\A, i uwh P.ei#*mià, Uffcio Eanfeai SaMfiM», " ~ Hot*, Vi.1.
    [Show full text]
  • Gauge Symmetry Breaking in Gauge Theories---In Search of Clarification
    Gauge Symmetry Breaking in Gauge Theories—In Search of Clarification Simon Friederich [email protected] Universit¨at Wuppertal, Fachbereich C – Mathematik und Naturwissenschaften, Gaußstr. 20, D-42119 Wuppertal, Germany Abstract: The paper investigates the spontaneous breaking of gauge sym- metries in gauge theories from a philosophical angle, taking into account the fact that the notion of a spontaneously broken local gauge symmetry, though widely employed in textbook expositions of the Higgs mechanism, is not supported by our leading theoretical frameworks of gauge quantum the- ories. In the context of lattice gauge theory, the statement that local gauge symmetry cannot be spontaneously broken can even be made rigorous in the form of Elitzur’s theorem. Nevertheless, gauge symmetry breaking does occur in gauge quantum field theories in the form of the breaking of remnant subgroups of the original local gauge group under which the theories typi- cally remain invariant after gauge fixing. The paper discusses the relation between these instances of symmetry breaking and phase transitions and draws some more general conclusions for the philosophical interpretation of gauge symmetries and their breaking. 1 Introduction The interpretation of symmetries and symmetry breaking has been recog- nized as a central topic in the philosophy of science in recent years. Gauge symmetries, in particular, have attracted a considerable amount of inter- arXiv:1107.4664v2 [physics.hist-ph] 5 Aug 2012 est due to the central role they play in our most successful theories of the fundamental constituents of nature. The standard model of elementary par- ticle physics, for instance, is formulated in terms of gauge symmetry, and so are its most discussed extensions.
    [Show full text]
  • Operator Gauge Symmetry in QED
    Symmetry, Integrability and Geometry: Methods and Applications Vol. 2 (2006), Paper 013, 7 pages Operator Gauge Symmetry in QED Siamak KHADEMI † and Sadollah NASIRI †‡ † Department of Physics, Zanjan University, P.O. Box 313, Zanjan, Iran E-mail: [email protected] URL: http://www.znu.ac.ir/Members/khademi.htm ‡ Institute for Advanced Studies in Basic Sciences, IASBS, Zanjan, Iran E-mail: [email protected] Received October 09, 2005, in final form January 17, 2006; Published online January 30, 2006 Original article is available at http://www.emis.de/journals/SIGMA/2006/Paper013/ Abstract. In this paper, operator gauge transformation, first introduced by Kobe, is applied to Maxwell’s equations and continuity equation in QED. The gauge invariance is satisfied after quantization of electromagnetic fields. Inherent nonlinearity in Maxwell’s equations is obtained as a direct result due to the nonlinearity of the operator gauge trans- formations. The operator gauge invariant Maxwell’s equations and corresponding charge conservation are obtained by defining the generalized derivatives of the f irst and second kinds. Conservation laws for the real and virtual charges are obtained too. The additional terms in the field strength tensor are interpreted as electric and magnetic polarization of the vacuum. Key words: gauge transformation; Maxwell’s equations; electromagnetic fields 2000 Mathematics Subject Classification: 81V80; 78A25 1 Introduction Conserved quantities of a system are direct consequences of symmetries inherent in the system. Therefore, symmetries are fundamental properties of any dynamical system [1, 2, 3]. For a sys- tem of electric charges an important quantity that is always expected to be conserved is the total charge.
    [Show full text]
  • НОВОСИБИРСК Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics, 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia
    ИНСТИТУТ ЯДЕРНОЙ ФИЗИКИ им. Г.И. Будкера СО РАН Sudker Institute of Nuclear Physics P.G. Silvestrcv CONSTRAINED INSTANTON AND BARYON NUMBER NON­CONSERVATION AT HIGH ENERGIES BIJ'DKERINP «2­92 НОВОСИБИРСК Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics, 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia P.G.SUvestrov CONSTRAINED INSTANTON AND BARYON NUMBER NON-CONSERVATION AT HIGH ENERGIES BUDKERINP 92-92 NOVOSIBIRSK 1992 Constrained Instanton and Baryon Number Non­Conservation at High Energies P.G.Silvestrov1 Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics, 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia Abstract The total cross ­ section for baryon number violating processes at high energies is usually parametrized as <r«,toi oe exp(—.F(e)), where 5 = Л/З/EQ EQ = у/^ттпш/tx. In the present paper the third nontrivial term of the expansion is obtain^. The unknown corrections to F{e) are expected to be of 8 3 2 the order of c ' , but have neither (mhfmw) , nor log(e) enhance­ ment. The .total cross ­ section is extremely sensitive to the value of single Instanton action. The correction to Instanton action A5 ~ (mp)* log(mp)/</2 is found (p is the Instanton radius). For sufficiently heavy Higgs boson the p­dependent part of the Instanton action is changed drastically, in this case even the leading contribution to F(e), responsible for a growth of cross ­ section due to the multiple produc­ tion of classical W­bosons, is changed: ©Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics 'е­таЦ address! PStt.VESTBOV®INP.NSK.SU 1 Introduction A few years ago it was recognized, that the total cross­section for baryon 1БЭ number violating processes, which is small like ехр(­4т/а) as 10~ [1] 2 (where a = р /(4тг)) at low energies, may become unsuppressed at TeV energies [2, 3, 4].
    [Show full text]
  • Avoiding Gauge Ambiguities in Cavity Quantum Electrodynamics Dominic M
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Avoiding gauge ambiguities in cavity quantum electrodynamics Dominic M. Rouse1*, Brendon W. Lovett1, Erik M. Gauger2 & Niclas Westerberg2,3* Systems of interacting charges and felds are ubiquitous in physics. Recently, it has been shown that Hamiltonians derived using diferent gauges can yield diferent physical results when matter degrees of freedom are truncated to a few low-lying energy eigenstates. This efect is particularly prominent in the ultra-strong coupling regime. Such ambiguities arise because transformations reshufe the partition between light and matter degrees of freedom and so level truncation is a gauge dependent approximation. To avoid this gauge ambiguity, we redefne the electromagnetic felds in terms of potentials for which the resulting canonical momenta and Hamiltonian are explicitly unchanged by the gauge choice of this theory. Instead the light/matter partition is assigned by the intuitive choice of separating an electric feld between displacement and polarisation contributions. This approach is an attractive choice in typical cavity quantum electrodynamics situations. Te gauge invariance of quantum electrodynamics (QED) is fundamental to the theory and can be used to greatly simplify calculations1–8. Of course, gauge invariance implies that physical observables are the same in all gauges despite superfcial diferences in the mathematics. However, it has recently been shown that the invariance is lost in the strong light/matter coupling regime if the matter degrees of freedom are treated as quantum systems with a fxed number of energy levels8–14, including the commonly used two-level truncation (2LT). At the origin of this is the role of gauge transformations (GTs) in deciding the partition between the light and matter degrees of freedom, even if the primary role of gauge freedom is to enforce Gauss’s law.
    [Show full text]
  • Supersymmetric Path Integrals
    Communications in Commun. Math. Phys. 108, 605-629 (1987) Mathematical Physics © Springer-Verlag 1987 Supersymmetric Path Integrals John Lott* Department of Mathematics, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA Abstract. The supersymmetric path integral is constructed for quantum mechanical models on flat space as a supersymmetric extension of the Wiener integral. It is then pushed forward to a compact Riemannian manifold by means of a Malliavin-type construction. The relation to index theory is discussed. Introduction An interesting new branch of mathematical physics is supersymmetry. With the advent of the theory of superstrings [1], it has become important to analyze the quantum field theory of supersymmetric maps from R2 to a manifold. This should probably be done in a supersymmetric way, that is, based on the theory of supermanifolds, and in a space-time covariant way as opposed to the Hamiltonian approach. Accordingly, one wishes to make sense of supersymmetric path integrals. As a first step we study a simpler case, that of supersymmetric maps from R1 to a manifold, which gives supersymmetric quantum mechanics. As Witten has shown, supersymmetric quantum mechanics is related to the index theory of differential operators [2]. In this particular case of a supersymmetric field theory, the Witten index, which gives a criterion for dynamical supersymmetry breaking, is the ordinary index of a differential operator. If one adds the adjoint to the operator and takes the square, one obtains the Hamiltonian of the quantum mechanical theory. These indices can be formally computed by supersymmetric path integrals. For example, the Euler characteristic of a manifold M is supposed to be given by integrating e~L, with * Research supported by an NSF postdoctoral fellowship Current address: IHES, Bures-sur-Yvette, France 606 J.
    [Show full text]
  • 8 Non-Abelian Gauge Theory: Perturbative Quantization
    8 Non-Abelian Gauge Theory: Perturbative Quantization We’re now ready to consider the quantum theory of Yang–Mills. In the first few sec- tions, we’ll treat the path integral formally as an integral over infinite dimensional spaces, without worrying about imposing a regularization. We’ll turn to questions about using renormalization to make sense of these formal integrals in section 8.3. To specify Yang–Mills theory, we had to pick a principal G bundle P M together ! with a connection on P . So our first thought might be to try to define the Yang–Mills r partition function as ? SYM[ ]/~ Z [(M,g), g ] = A e− r (8.1) YM YM D ZA where 1 SYM[ ]= tr(F F ) (8.2) r −2g2 r ^⇤ r YM ZM as before, and is the space of all connections on P . A To understand what this integral might mean, first note that, given any two connections and , the 1-parameter family r r0 ⌧ = ⌧ +(1 ⌧) 0 (8.3) r r − r is also a connection for all ⌧ [0, 1]. For example, you can check that the rhs has the 2 behaviour expected of a connection under any gauge transformation. Thus we can find a 1 path in between any two connections. Since 0 ⌦M (g), we conclude that is an A r r2 1 A infinite dimensional affine space whose tangent space at any point is ⌦M (g), the infinite dimensional space of all g–valued covectors on M. In fact, it’s easy to write down a flat (L2-)metric on using the metric on M: A 2 1 µ⌫ a a d ds = tr(δA δA)= g δAµ δA⌫ pg d x.
    [Show full text]
  • The Uncertainty Principle: Group Theoretic Approach, Possible Minimizers and Scale-Space Properties
    The Uncertainty Principle: Group Theoretic Approach, Possible Minimizers and Scale-Space Properties Chen Sagiv1, Nir A. Sochen1, and Yehoshua Y. Zeevi2 1 Department of Applied Mathematics University of Tel Aviv Ramat-Aviv, Tel-Aviv 69978, Israel [email protected],[email protected] 2 Department of Electrical engineering Technion - Israel Institute of Technology Technion City, Haifa 32000, Israel [email protected] Abstract. The uncertainty principle is a fundamental concept in the context of signal and image processing, just as much as it has been in the framework of physics and more recently in harmonic analysis. Un- certainty principles can be derived by using a group theoretic approach. This approach yields also a formalism for finding functions which are the minimizers of the uncertainty principles. A general theorem which associates an uncertainty principle with a pair of self-adjoint operators is used in finding the minimizers of the uncertainty related to various groups. This study is concerned with the uncertainty principle in the context of the Weyl-Heisenberg, the SIM(2), the Affine and the Affine-Weyl- Heisenberg groups. We explore the relationship between the two-dimensional affine group and the SIM(2) group in terms of the uncertainty minimizers. The uncertainty principle is also extended to the Affine-Weyl-Heisenberg group in one dimension. Possible minimizers related to these groups are also presented and the scale-space properties of some of the minimizers are explored. 1 Introduction Various applications in signal and image processing call for deployment of a filter bank. The latter can be used for representation, de-noising and edge en- hancement, among other applications.
    [Show full text]
  • Functional Integration and the Mind
    Synthese (2007) 159:315–328 DOI 10.1007/s11229-007-9240-3 Functional integration and the mind Jakob Hohwy Published online: 26 September 2007 © Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007 Abstract Different cognitive functions recruit a number of different, often over- lapping, areas of the brain. Theories in cognitive and computational neuroscience are beginning to take this kind of functional integration into account. The contributions to this special issue consider what functional integration tells us about various aspects of the mind such as perception, language, volition, agency, and reward. Here, I consider how and why functional integration may matter for the mind; I discuss a general the- oretical framework, based on generative models, that may unify many of the debates surrounding functional integration and the mind; and I briefly introduce each of the contributions. Keywords Functional integration · Functional segregation · Interconnectivity · Phenomenology · fMRI · Generative models · Predictive coding 1 Introduction Across the diverse subdisciplines of the mind sciences, there is a growing awareness that, in order to properly understand the brain as the basis of the mind, our theorising and experimental work must to a higher degree incorporate the fact that activity in the brain, at the level of individual neurons, over neural populations, to cortical areas, is characterised by massive interconnectivity. In brain imaging science, this represents a move away from ‘blob-ology’, with a focus on local areas of activity, and towards functional integration, with a focus on the functional and dynamic causal relations between areas of activity. Similarly, in J. Hohwy (B) Department of Philosophy, Monash University, Clayton, VIC 3800, Australia e-mail: [email protected] 123 316 Synthese (2007) 159:315–328 theoretical neuroscience there is a renewed focus on the computational significance of the interaction between bottom-up and top-down neural signals.
    [Show full text]
  • Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking in the Higgs Mechanism
    Spontaneous symmetry breaking in the Higgs mechanism August 2012 Abstract The Higgs mechanism is very powerful: it furnishes a description of the elec- troweak theory in the Standard Model which has a convincing experimental ver- ification. But although the Higgs mechanism had been applied successfully, the conceptual background is not clear. The Higgs mechanism is often presented as spontaneous breaking of a local gauge symmetry. But a local gauge symmetry is rooted in redundancy of description: gauge transformations connect states that cannot be physically distinguished. A gauge symmetry is therefore not a sym- metry of nature, but of our description of nature. The spontaneous breaking of such a symmetry cannot be expected to have physical e↵ects since asymmetries are not reflected in the physics. If spontaneous gauge symmetry breaking cannot have physical e↵ects, this causes conceptual problems for the Higgs mechanism, if taken to be described as spontaneous gauge symmetry breaking. In a gauge invariant theory, gauge fixing is necessary to retrieve the physics from the theory. This means that also in a theory with spontaneous gauge sym- metry breaking, a gauge should be fixed. But gauge fixing itself breaks the gauge symmetry, and thereby obscures the spontaneous breaking of the symmetry. It suggests that spontaneous gauge symmetry breaking is not part of the physics, but an unphysical artifact of the redundancy in description. However, the Higgs mechanism can be formulated in a gauge independent way, without spontaneous symmetry breaking. The same outcome as in the account with spontaneous symmetry breaking is obtained. It is concluded that even though spontaneous gauge symmetry breaking cannot have physical consequences, the Higgs mechanism is not in conceptual danger.
    [Show full text]