Viral Surface Glycoproteins, Gp120 and Gp41, As Potential Drug Targets
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1 Oril Is Not Required for Virus Infection In
JOURNAL OF VIROLOGY, Nov. 1987, p. 3528-3535 Vol. 61, No. 11 0022-538X/87/113528-08$02.00/0 Copyright C 1987, American Society for Microbiology Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1 oriL Is Not Required for Virus Replication or for the Establishment and Reactivation of Latent Infection in Mice MARYELLEN POLVINO-BODNAR, PAULO K. ORBERG, AND PRISCILLA A. SCHAFFER* Laboratory of Tumor Virus Genetics, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, and Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115 Received 11 May 1987/Accepted 31 July 1987 During the course of experiments designed to isolate deletion mutants of herpes simplex virus type 1 in the gene encoding the major DNA-binding protein, ICP8, a mutant, d61, that grew efficiently in ICP8-expressing Vero cells but not in normal Vero cells was isolated (P. K. Orberg and P. A. Schaffer, J. Virol. 61:1136-1146, 1987). d61 was derived by cotransfection of ICP8-expressing Vero cells with infectious wild-type viral DNA and a plasmid, pDX, that contains an engineered 780-base-pair (bp) deletion in the ICP8 gene, as well as a spontaneous -55-bp deletion in OriL. Gel electrophoresis and Southern blot analysis indicated that d61 DNA carried both deletions present in pDX. The ability of d61 to replicate despite the deletion in OriL suggested that a functional OriL is not essential for virus replication in vitro. Because d61 harbored two mutations, a second mutant, ts+7, with a deletion in oriL-associated sequences and an intact ICP8 gene was constructed. Both d61 and ts+7 replicated efficiently in their respective permissive host cells, although their yields were slightly lower than those of control viruses with intact oriL sequences. -
Foamy Virus Assembly with Emphasis on Pol Encapsidation
Viruses 2013, 5, 886-900; doi:10.3390/v5030886 OPEN ACCESS viruses ISSN 1999-4915 www.mdpi.com/journal/viruses Review Foamy Virus Assembly with Emphasis on Pol Encapsidation Eun-Gyung Lee 1, Carolyn R. Stenbak 2 and Maxine L. Linial 1,* 1 Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Basic Sciences Division; 1100 Fairview Avenue North, Seattle, WA 98109, USA; E-Mails: [email protected] (EGL); [email protected] (MLL) 2 Seattle University, Biology Department; 901 12th Avenue, Seattle, WA 98122, USA; E-Mail: [email protected] * Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mail: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-206- 667-4442; Fax: +1-206-667-5939 Received: 31 January 2013; in revised form: 11 March 2013 / Accepted: 14 March 2013 / Published: 20 March 2013 Abstract: Foamy viruses (FVs) differ from all other genera of retroviruses (orthoretroviruses) in many aspects of viral replication. In this review, we discuss FV assembly, with special emphasis on Pol incorporation. FV assembly takes place intracellularly, near the pericentriolar region, at a site similar to that used by betaretroviruses. The regions of Gag, Pol and genomic RNA required for viral assembly are described. In contrast to orthoretroviral Pol, which is synthesized as a Gag-Pol fusion protein and packaged through Gag-Gag interactions, FV Pol is synthesized from a spliced mRNA lacking all Gag sequences. Thus, encapsidation of FV Pol requires a different mechanism. We detail how WT Pol lacking Gag sequences is incorporated into virus particles. In addition, a mutant in which Pol is expressed as an orthoretroviral-like Gag-Pol fusion protein is discussed. -
Topological Analysis of the Gp41 MPER on Lipid Bilayers Relevant to the Metastable HIV-1 Envelope Prefusion State
Topological analysis of the gp41 MPER on lipid bilayers relevant to the metastable HIV-1 envelope prefusion state Yi Wanga,b, Pavanjeet Kaurc,d, Zhen-Yu J. Sune,1, Mostafa A. Elbahnasawya,b,2, Zahra Hayatic,d, Zhi-Song Qiaoa,b,3, Nhat N. Buic, Camila Chilea,b,4, Mahmoud L. Nasre,5, Gerhard Wagnere, Jia-Huai Wanga,f, Likai Songc, Ellis L. Reinherza,b,6, and Mikyung Kima,g,6 aLaboratory of Immunobiology, Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02115; bDepartment of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115; cNational High Magnetic Field Laboratory, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL 32306; dDepartment of Physics, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL 32306; eDepartment of Biological Chemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115; fDepartment of Cancer Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215; and gDepartment of Dermatology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02215 Edited by Peter Palese, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, and approved September 23, 2019 (received for review July 18, 2019) The membrane proximal external region (MPER) of HIV-1 envelope immunologically vulnerable epitopes targeted by several of the most glycoprotein (gp) 41 is an attractive vaccine target for elicitation of broadly neutralizing antibodies (bNAbs) developed during the broadly neutralizing antibodies (bNAbs) by vaccination. However, course of natural HIV-1 infection (10–13). Insertion, deletion, current details regarding the quaternary structural organization of and mutations of residues in the MPER defined the functional the MPER within the native prefusion trimer [(gp120/41)3] are elu- importance of the MPER in Env incorporation, viral fusion, and sive and even contradictory, hindering rational MPER immunogen infectivity (14–16). -
The Nef-Infectivity Enigma: Mechanisms of Enhanced Lentiviral Infection Jolien Vermeire§, Griet Vanbillemont§, Wojciech Witkowski and Bruno Verhasselt*
View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by PubMed Central 474 Current HIV Research, 2011, 9, 474-489 The Nef-Infectivity Enigma: Mechanisms of Enhanced Lentiviral Infection Jolien Vermeire§, Griet Vanbillemont§, Wojciech Witkowski and Bruno Verhasselt* Department of Clinical Chemistry, Microbiology, and Immunology, Ghent University, Belgium Abstract: The Nef protein is an essential factor for lentiviral pathogenesis in humans and other simians. Despite a multitude of functions attributed to this protein, the exact role of Nef in disease progression remains unclear. One of its most intriguing functions is the ability of Nef to enhance the infectivity of viral particles. In this review we will discuss current insights in the mechanism of this well-known, yet poorly understood Nef effect. We will elaborate on effects of Nef, on both virion biogenesis and the early stage of the cellular infection, that might be involved in infectivity enhancement. In addition, we provide an overview of different HIV-1 Nef domains important for optimal infectivity and briefly discuss some possible sources of the frequent discrepancies in the field. Hereby we aim to contribute to a better understanding of this highly conserved and therapeutically attractive Nef function. Keywords: Nef, HIV, infectivity, viral replication, mutation analysis, envelope protein, cholesterol, proteasome. 1. INTRODUCTION 2. THE MULTIFACETED NEF PROTEIN Despite the globally declining number of new human As early as 1991, infections of rhesus monkeys with nef- immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infections [1] and the hopeful deleted simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) revealed a observation that cure from HIV infection does not seem dramatic reduction of viral loads and disease progression in impossible [2], the HIV pandemic still remains a very absence of nef [6]. -
HIV-1 Rev Downregulates Tat Expression and Viral Replication Via Modulation of NAD(P)H:Quinine Oxidoreductase 1 (NQO1)
ARTICLE Received 25 Jul 2014 | Accepted 22 Apr 2015 | Published 10 Jun 2015 DOI: 10.1038/ncomms8244 HIV-1 Rev downregulates Tat expression and viral replication via modulation of NAD(P)H:quinine oxidoreductase 1 (NQO1) Sneh Lata1,*, Amjad Ali2,*, Vikas Sood1,2,w, Rameez Raja2 & Akhil C. Banerjea2 HIV-1 gene expression and replication largely depend on the regulatory proteins Tat and Rev, but it is unclear how the intracellular levels of these viral proteins are regulated after infection. Here we report that HIV-1 Rev causes specific degradation of cytoplasmic Tat, which results in inhibition of HIV-1 replication. The nuclear export signal (NES) region of Rev is crucial for this activity but is not involved in direct interactions with Tat. Rev reduces the levels of ubiquitinated forms of Tat, which have previously been reported to be important for its transcriptional properties. Tat is stabilized in the presence of NAD(P)H:quinine oxidoreductase 1 (NQO1), and potent degradation of Tat is induced by dicoumarol, an NQO1 inhibitor. Furthermore, Rev causes specific reduction in the levels of endogenous NQO1. Thus, we propose that Rev is able to induce degradation of Tat indirectly by downregulating NQO1 levels. Our findings have implications in HIV-1 gene expression and latency. 1 Department of Microbiology, University College of Medical Sciences and Guru Teg Bahadur Hospital, Delhi 110095, India. 2 Laboratory of Virology, National Institute of Immunology, New Delhi 110067, India. * These authors contributed equally to this work. w Present address: Translational Health Science and Technology Institute, Faridabad, Haryana 121004, India. Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to A.C.B. -
Symposium on Viral Membrane Proteins
Viral Membrane Proteins ‐ Shanghai 2011 交叉学科论坛 Symposium for Advanced Studies 第二十七期:病毒离子通道蛋白的结构与功能研讨会 Symposium on Viral Membrane Proteins 主办单位:中国科学院上海交叉学科研究中心 承办单位:上海巴斯德研究所 1 Viral Membrane Proteins ‐ Shanghai 2011 Symposium on Viral Membrane Proteins Shanghai Institute for Advanced Studies, CAS Institut Pasteur of Shanghai,CAS 30.11. – 2.12 2011 Shanghai, China 2 Viral Membrane Proteins ‐ Shanghai 2011 Schedule: Wednesday, 30th of November 2011 Morning Arrival Thursday, 1st of December 2011 8:00 Arrival 9:00 Welcome Bing Sun, Co-Director, Pasteur Institute Shanghai 9: 10 – 9:35 Bing Sun, Pasteur Institute Shanghai Ion channel study and drug target fuction research of coronavirus 3a like protein. 9:35 – 10:00 Tim Cross, Tallahassee, USA The proton conducting mechanism and structure of M2 proton channel in lipid bilayers. 10:00 – 10:25 Shy Arkin, Jerusalem, IL A backbone structure of SARS Coronavirus E protein based on Isotope edited FTIR, X-ray reflectivity and biochemical analysis. 10:20 – 10:45 Coffee Break 10:45 – 11:10 Rainer Fink, Heidelberg, DE Elektromechanical coupling in muscle: a viral target? 11:10 – 11:35 Yechiel Shai, Rehovot, IL The interplay between HIV1 fusion peptide, the transmembrane domain and the T-cell receptor in immunosuppression. 11:35 – 12:00 Christoph Cremer, Mainz and Heidelberg University, DE Super-resolution Fluorescence imaging of cellular and viral nanostructures. 12:00 – 13:30 Lunch Break 3 Viral Membrane Proteins ‐ Shanghai 2011 13:30 – 13:55 Jung-Hsin Lin, National Taiwan University Robust Scoring Functions for Protein-Ligand Interactions with Quantum Chemical Charge Models. 13:55 – 14:20 Martin Ulmschneider, Irvine, USA Towards in-silico assembly of viral channels: the trials and tribulations of Influenza M2 tetramerization. -
Viroporins: Structures and Functions Beyond Cell Membrane Permeabilization
Editorial Viroporins: Structures and Functions beyond Cell Membrane Permeabilization José Luis Nieva 1,* and Luis Carrasco 2,* Received: 17 September 2015 ; Accepted: 21 September 2015 ; Published: 29 September 2015 Academic Editor: Eric O. Freed 1 Biophysics Unit (CSIC, UPV/EHU) and Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Department, University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU), P.O. Box 644, 48080 Bilbao, Spain 2 Centro de Biología Molecular Severo Ochoa (CSIC, UAM), c/Nicolás Cabrera, 1, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Cantoblanco, 28049 Madrid, Spain * Correspondence: [email protected] (J.L.N.); [email protected] (L.C.); Tel.: +34-94-601-3353 (J.L.N.); +34-91-497-8450 (L.C.) Viroporins represent an interesting group of viral proteins that exhibit two sets of functions. First, they participate in several viral processes that are necessary for efficient production of virus progeny. Besides, viroporins interfere with a number of cellular functions, thus contributing to viral cytopathogenicity. Twenty years have elapsed from the first review on viroporins [1]; since then several reviews have covered the advances on viroporin structure and functioning [2–8]. This Special Issue updates and revises new emerging roles of viroporins, highlighting their potential use as antiviral targets and in vaccine development. Viroporin structure. Viroporins are usually short proteins with at least one hydrophobic amphipathic helix. Homo-oligomerization is achieved by helix–helix interactions in membranes rendering higher order structures, forming aqueous pores. Progress in viroporin structures during the last 2–3 years has in some instances provided a detailed knowledge of their functional architecture, including the fine definition of binding sites for effective inhibitors. -
Patent Document US 06872395
I 1111111111111111 11111 111111111111111 1111111111 1111111111 lll111111111111111 US006872395B2 (12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 6,872,395 B2 Kawaoka (45) Date of Patent: Mar.29,2005 (54) VIRUSES COMPRISING MUTANT ION Mena, I., et al., "Rescue of a Synthetic Choramphenicol CHANNEL PROTEIN Acetyltransferase RNA into influenza Virus-Like Particles obtained from recombinant plasmids", J. of Virology, vol. (75) Inventor: Yoshihiro Kawaoka, Madison, WI 70, No. 8, XP002150091, 5016-5024, (Aug. 1996). (US) Neumann, G., et al., "Generation of influenza A Viruses entirely from cloned cDNAs", Proc. of the Nat'l Aca. of (73) Assignee: Wisconsin Alumni Research Sciences, USA, vol. 96, XP002150093, 9345-9350, (Aug. Foundation, Madison, WI (US) 1999). ( *) Notice: Subject to any disclaimer, the term of this Neumann, G., et al., "Plasmid-Driven Formation of Influ patent is extended or adjusted under 35 enza Virus-Like Particles", J. of Virology, vol. 74, No. 1, U.S.C. 154(b) by O days. XP002150094, 547-551, (Jan. 2000). Neumann, G., et al., "RNA Polymerase I-Mediated Expres sion of Influenza Viral RNA Molecules", Virology, vol. 202, (21) Appl. No.: 09/834,095 No. 1, XP000952667, 477-479, (Jul. 1994). (22) Filed: Apr. 12, 2001 Neirynck, S., et al., "A universal influenza A vaccine based on the extracellular domain of the M2 protein", Nature (65) Prior Publication Data Medicine, 5 (10), pp. 1157-1163, (Oct. 1999). US 2003/0194694 Al Oct. 16, 2003 Piller, S. C., et al., "Vpr protein of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 forms cation-selective channels in planar lipid Related U.S. Application Data bilayers", PNAS, 93, pp. -
How Influenza Virus Uses Host Cell Pathways During Uncoating
cells Review How Influenza Virus Uses Host Cell Pathways during Uncoating Etori Aguiar Moreira 1 , Yohei Yamauchi 2 and Patrick Matthias 1,3,* 1 Friedrich Miescher Institute for Biomedical Research, 4058 Basel, Switzerland; [email protected] 2 Faculty of Life Sciences, School of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1TD, UK; [email protected] 3 Faculty of Sciences, University of Basel, 4031 Basel, Switzerland * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: Influenza is a zoonotic respiratory disease of major public health interest due to its pan- demic potential, and a threat to animals and the human population. The influenza A virus genome consists of eight single-stranded RNA segments sequestered within a protein capsid and a lipid bilayer envelope. During host cell entry, cellular cues contribute to viral conformational changes that promote critical events such as fusion with late endosomes, capsid uncoating and viral genome release into the cytosol. In this focused review, we concisely describe the virus infection cycle and highlight the recent findings of host cell pathways and cytosolic proteins that assist influenza uncoating during host cell entry. Keywords: influenza; capsid uncoating; HDAC6; ubiquitin; EPS8; TNPO1; pandemic; M1; virus– host interaction Citation: Moreira, E.A.; Yamauchi, Y.; Matthias, P. How Influenza Virus Uses Host Cell Pathways during 1. Introduction Uncoating. Cells 2021, 10, 1722. Viruses are microscopic parasites that, unable to self-replicate, subvert a host cell https://doi.org/10.3390/ for their replication and propagation. Despite their apparent simplicity, they can cause cells10071722 severe diseases and even pose pandemic threats [1–3]. -
Opportunistic Intruders: How Viruses Orchestrate ER Functions to Infect Cells
REVIEWS Opportunistic intruders: how viruses orchestrate ER functions to infect cells Madhu Sudhan Ravindran*, Parikshit Bagchi*, Corey Nathaniel Cunningham and Billy Tsai Abstract | Viruses subvert the functions of their host cells to replicate and form new viral progeny. The endoplasmic reticulum (ER) has been identified as a central organelle that governs the intracellular interplay between viruses and hosts. In this Review, we analyse how viruses from vastly different families converge on this unique intracellular organelle during infection, co‑opting some of the endogenous functions of the ER to promote distinct steps of the viral life cycle from entry and replication to assembly and egress. The ER can act as the common denominator during infection for diverse virus families, thereby providing a shared principle that underlies the apparent complexity of relationships between viruses and host cells. As a plethora of information illuminating the molecular and cellular basis of virus–ER interactions has become available, these insights may lead to the development of crucial therapeutic agents. Morphogenesis Viruses have evolved sophisticated strategies to establish The ER is a membranous system consisting of the The process by which a virus infection. Some viruses bind to cellular receptors and outer nuclear envelope that is contiguous with an intri‑ particle changes its shape and initiate entry, whereas others hijack cellular factors that cate network of tubules and sheets1, which are shaped by structure. disassemble the virus particle to facilitate entry. After resident factors in the ER2–4. The morphology of the ER SEC61 translocation delivering the viral genetic material into the host cell and is highly dynamic and experiences constant structural channel the translation of the viral genes, the resulting proteins rearrangements, enabling the ER to carry out a myriad An endoplasmic reticulum either become part of a new virus particle (or particles) of functions5. -
(Infected Cell Protein 8) of Herpes Simplex Virus L*
THEJOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY Vol. 262, No. 9, Issue of March 25, pp. 4260-4266, 1987 0 1987 by The American Society of Biological Chemists, Inc Printed in U.S. A. Interaction between theDNA Polymerase and Single-stranded DNA- binding Protein (Infected Cell Protein 8) of Herpes Simplex Virus l* (Received for publication, September 22, 1986) Michael E. O’DonnellS, Per EliasQ,Barbara E. Funnellll, and I. R. Lehman From the Department of Biochemistry, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California 94305 The herpes virus-encoded DNA replication protein, ICP8 completely inhibits replication of singly primed ssDNA infected cell protein 8 (ICPS), binds specifically to templates by the herpespolymerase. On the other hand, ICP8 single-stranded DNA with a stoichiometry of one ICPS strongly stimulates replication of duplex DNA. It does so, molecule/l2 nucleotides. In the absence of single- however, onlyin the presence of anuclear extract from stranded DNA, it assembles into long filamentous herpes-infected cells. structures. Binding of ICPS inhibits DNA synthesis by the herpes-induced DNA polymerase on singly primed EXPERIMENTALPROCEDURES single-stranded DNA circles. In contrast, ICPS greatly Materials-DNase I and venom phosphodiesterase were obtained stimulates replication of circular duplex DNA by the from Worthington. The syntheticoligodeoxynucleotide (44-mer) was polymerase. Stimulation occurs only in the presence of synthesized by the solid-phase coupling of protected phosphoramidate a nuclear extract from herpes-infected cells. Appear- nucleoside derivatives (11).3H-Labeled #X ssDNA was a gift from ance of the stimulatory activity in nuclear extracts Dr. R. Bryant (this department). pMOB45 (10.5 kilobases) linear coincides closely with the time of appearance of her- duplex plasmid DNA was a gift from Dr. -
Filoviral Immune Evasion Mechanisms
Viruses 2011, 3, 1634-1649; doi:10.3390/v3091634 OPEN ACCESS viruses ISSN 1999-4915 www.mdpi.com/journal/viruses Review Filoviral Immune Evasion Mechanisms Parameshwaran Ramanan 1,3, Reed S. Shabman 2, Craig S. Brown 1,4, Gaya K. Amarasinghe 1,*, Christopher F. Basler 2,* and Daisy W. Leung 1,* 1 Department of Biochemistry, Biophysics and Molecular Biology, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011, USA 2 Department of Microbiology, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY 10029, USA 3 Biochemistry Graduate Program, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011, USA 4 Biochemistry Undergraduate Program, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011, USA * Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed; [email protected] (G.K.A); [email protected] (C.F.B); [email protected] (D.W.L.). Received: 11 August 2011 / Accepted: 15 August 2011 / Published: 7 September 2011 Abstract: The Filoviridae family of viruses, which includes the genera Ebolavirus (EBOV) and Marburgvirus (MARV), causes severe and often times lethal hemorrhagic fever in humans. Filoviral infections are associated with ineffective innate antiviral responses as a result of virally encoded immune antagonists, which render the host incapable of mounting effective innate or adaptive immune responses. The Type I interferon (IFN) response is critical for establishing an antiviral state in the host cell and subsequent activation of the adaptive immune responses. Several filoviral encoded components target Type I IFN responses, and this innate immune suppression is important for viral replication and pathogenesis. For example, EBOV VP35 inhibits the phosphorylation of IRF-3/7 by the TBK-1/IKKε kinases in addition to sequestering viral RNA from detection by RIG-I like receptors.