Single-Photon Three-Qubit Quantum Logic Using Spatial Light Modulators
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
ARTICLE DOI: 10.1038/s41467-017-00580-x OPEN Single-photon three-qubit quantum logic using spatial light modulators Kumel H. Kagalwala1, Giovanni Di Giuseppe 1,2, Ayman F. Abouraddy1 & Bahaa E.A. Saleh1 The information-carrying capacity of a single photon can be vastly expanded by exploiting its multiple degrees of freedom: spatial, temporal, and polarization. Although multiple qubits can be encoded per photon, to date only two-qubit single-photon quantum operations have been realized. Here, we report an experimental demonstration of three-qubit single-photon, linear, deterministic quantum gates that exploit photon polarization and the two-dimensional spatial-parity-symmetry of the transverse single-photon field. These gates are implemented using a polarization-sensitive spatial light modulator that provides a robust, non-interferometric, versatile platform for implementing controlled unitary gates. Polarization here represents the control qubit for either separable or entangling unitary operations on the two spatial-parity target qubits. Such gates help generate maximally entangled three-qubit Greenberger–Horne–Zeilinger and W states, which is confirmed by tomographical reconstruction of single-photon density matrices. This strategy provides access to a wide range of three-qubit states and operations for use in few-qubit quantum information processing protocols. 1 CREOL, The College of Optics & Photonics, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL 32816, USA. 2 School of Science and Technology, Physics Division, University of Camerino, Camerino 62032, Italy. Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to A.F.A. (email: [email protected]) NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | 8: 739 | DOI: 10.1038/s41467-017-00580-x | www.nature.com/naturecommunications 1 ARTICLE NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | DOI: 10.1038/s41467-017-00580-x – hotonic implementations of quantum logic gates1 7 are in which the degrees of freedom (DoFs) of single photons are largely unaffected by the deleterious effects of decoherence entangled via quantum non-demolition measurements to carry P 17 and can potentially integrate seamlessly with existing out computation in smaller, spatially separated sub-systems . technologies for secure quantum communication8.ToHowever, this technique requires a single-photon cross-phase circumnavigate challenges to realizing nonlinearity-mediated modulation. Few-qubit SPQL obviates the need for single-photon – photon–photon entangling interactions9 13, Knill, Laflamme, nonlinearities, but requires improvements in the generation and and Milburn (KLM) developed a quantum computing manipulation of entangled states in large-dimensional Hilbert protocol that is efficient and scalable—but probabilistic—using spaces spanning all photonic DoFs—spatial, temporal, and only single-photon sources, linear optical elements, polarization18, 19. Along this vein, recent efforts have focused on projective measurements, and single-photon detectors14.In the spatial DoF—orbital angular momentum (OAM)20, – contrast, single-photon quantum logic (SPQL) aims to exploit the spatial modes21, 22, or multiple paths23 25—in conjunction with potentially large information-carrying capacity of a single polarization. To date, SPQL demonstrations have been limited to photon to offer deterministic computation—at the expense of an two qubits and include controlled-NOT (CNOT) and SWAP exponential scale-up of resources with qubits. A quantum gates23, 24, implementation of the Deutsch algorithm26, quantum circuit in which a single photon encodes n qubits requires an key distribution (QKD) without a shared reference frame27, interferometric network with 2n paths15, 16. To curtail this mounting an attack on BB84 QKD28, and hyperentanglement- exponential rise in complexity, a hybrid approach was proposed assisted Bell-state analysis29. abPolarization x-Parity c y-Parity 〉 〉 ⎢ x ⎢ y +1 +1 0 0 Qubit –1 –1 representation 〉 〉 〉 〉 〉 〉 ⎢V ⎢H ⎢ex ⎢ox ⎢ey ⎢oy 〉 ⎢ 〉 ⎢H〉 ⎢ex ey – – – – ⎪D 〉 ⎪d 〉 ⎪d 〉 ⎪R 〉 –〉 x ⎪r–〉 y ⎪rx y + + +〉 ⎪ 〉 + ⎪r 〉 +〉 ⎪R +〉 rx 〉 y ⎪D ⎪dx ⎪dy Poincaré sphere Poincaré 〉 〉 ⎢ 〉 ⎪V ⎢ox oy – 2 – – – 2 2 – – 2 Pauli X Pauli HWP @ 45° PFX PFy Pauli Z Pauli HWP @ 0° SFX SFy – 2 – – – 2 2 –– 2 QWP @ 90° Rotation Pol-R @ PRX PRy QWP @ 0° e H ex y o oy V x Projection PBS PA X PA y Fig. 1 Toolbox for single-photon one-qubit operations for polarization and spatial-parity. a Hilbert space of polarization showing a schematic representation of the basis, the Poincaré sphere highlighting the fgjiV ; jiH , fgjiDþ ; jiDÀ , and fgjiRþ ; jiRÀ bases whose elements occupy antipodal positions; here þ p1ffiffi , À p1ffiffi , Rþ p1ffiffi i , and À p1ffiffi i . The Pauli X and Z operators are implemented by a jiD ¼ 2 ðÞjiH þ jiV jiD ¼ 2 ðÞjiH À jiV ji¼ 2 ðÞjiH þ jiV jiR ¼ 2 ðÞjiH À jiV half-wave plate (HWP) with the fast axis oriented at 45° and 0°, respectively; a rotation operator RP(θ) by a sequence of a quarter-wave plate (QWP), a HWP, and a QWP, oriented at 0°, θ, and 0°, respectively; while a polarizing beam splitter (PBS) projects onto the fgjiV ; jiH basis. b Same as a for the ÈÉx-parity Hilbert space. We show representative even and odd modes and the Poincaré-sphere representation of different parity bases fgjie ; jio , þ À þ À ; , and þ ; À whose elements occupy antipodal positions; here p1ffiffi , p1ffiffi , þ p1ffiffi i , and d jid fgjir jir d ¼ 2 ðÞjie þ jio jid ¼ 2 ðÞjie À jio jir ¼ 2 ðÞjie þ jio À p1ffiffi i . The parity X-operator (a parity flipper, PF) is implemented by a π phase-step along x; the parity Z (a spatial flipper, SF) by a Dove jir ¼ 2 ðÞjie À jio prism or a parity prism; a parity rotator (PR) by a phase-step θ along x, which rotates the state on the major circle connecting the states fgjie ; jio ; jirþ ; jirÀ ; and a modified MZI acts as a parity analyzer (PA) that projects onto the {jie ,jio } basis. c Same as b for the y-parity Hilbert space. All the parity-altering devices require a 90°-rotation around the propagation axis with respect to their x-parity counterparts 2 NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | 8: 739 | DOI: 10.1038/s41467-017-00580-x | www.nature.com/naturecommunications NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | DOI: 10.1038/s41467-017-00580-x ARTICLE a ⎜ 〉 x –– – –– – –– – –– – 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 +1 ⎜ 〉 ⎜ 〉 ⎜ 〉 〉 0 Vex Vox Hex ⎜Hox 〉 〉 〉 〉 –1 ⎜Vex ⎜Vox ⎜Hox ⎜Hex b – – – – 〉 2 2 2 2 ⎜ y –– –– –– –– +1 2 2 2 2 〉 ⎜Vo 〉 〉 〉 0 ⎜Vey y ⎜Hey ⎜Hoy 〉 〉 〉 〉 –1 ⎜Vey ⎜Voy ⎜Hoy ⎜Hey Fig. 2 Impact of a polarization-sensitive phase-only SLM on polarized single-photons. a Impact of a polarization-sensitive phase-only SLM on x-parity. The SLM imparts a phase step π along x. When the polarization is horizontal jiH , the SLM phase modulation results in a flip in the x-parity: jiex → ijiox and jiox → ijiex . When the polarization is vertical jiV , the x-parity is unchanged, regardless of the SLM phase: jiex → jiex and jiox → jiox . b Same as a applied to y-parity. The SLMs in a and b can thus be viewed as two-qubit quantum logic gates where polarization is the control qubit and x-ory-parity is the target qubit A different approach to exploiting the photon spatial DoF select which gate is implemented. We exploit these gates to makes use of its spatial-parity symmetry—whether it is even or generate single-photon three-qubit maximally entangled odd under inversion—regardless of the specific transverse spatial Greenberger–Horne–Zeilinger (GHZ) and W states43 from initial – profile30 32. Implementing this scheme with entangled photon generic, separable states. The performance of these logic gates is pairs enabled the violation of Bell’s inequality in the characterized by determining their truth tables and through spatial domain exploiting Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen states30, 33. quantum state tomography of the states produced when the gate In this approach, the parity symmetry of a single photon can is interrogated. Spatial-parity is analyzed using a balanced encode two qubits, one along each transverse coordinate, which Mach–Zehnder interferometer (MZI) containing an optical provides crucial advantages. First, because only the component that flips the spatial beam profile. In lieu of traditional internal transverse-parity symmetry is exploited, the need for Dove prisms that introduce unavoidable parasitic coupling interferometric stability required in multipath realizations is between polarization and spatial rotation44, 45, we exploit a eliminated. Second, the Cartesian x- and y-coordinates of the custom-designed “parity prism” that is polarization neutral and two-dimensional (2D) transverse field are treated symmetrically, thus facilitates precise projections in the parity sub-space. unlike the intrinsic asymmetry between the polar azimuthal and Our technique is a robust approach to the photonic radial coordinates used in OAM experiments. Therefore, the implementation of few-qubit quantum information processing same optical arrangement for manipulating the spatial-parity applications. Multiple SLMs may be cascaded to realize few-qubit symmetry along x (hereafter x-parity for brevity) can be protocols, and potentially for implementing quantum utilized for the y-parity after a rotation34, whereas error-correction codes46. The wide array of three-qubit states approaches for manipulating and analyzing radial accessible via this technique may help improve the violations of – optical modes along with OAM modes are lacking (see refs. 35 39 local realistic theories in experimental tests47 and enhance the for recent progress). Third, phase modulation of the single- sensitivity of quantum metrology schemes48. photon