Hexagonal Planning in Theory and Practice

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Hexagonal Planning in Theory and Practice Journal ofUrban Design,Vol. 5, No. 3, 237± 265, 2000 Hexagonal Planningin Theoryand Practice ERANBEN-JOSEPH & DAVIDGORDON ABSTRACT Residentialneighbourhood designs with street patterns basedupon hexagonal blockswere proposedby several planners in theearly 20th century. Urban designerssuch asCharles Lamb, NoulanCauchon and Barry Parker demonstrated the economic advan- tagesand ef® cient landuse generatedby hexagonal plans. By 1930, hexagonal planning was aleadingtheoretical alternative to therectangular gridfor residential subdivisions, but itwas displacedby the loop and cul-de-sac modeldeveloped in Radburn, New Jersey, byClarence Stein andHenry Wright.The paper chronologically reviews the various hexagonalplanning schemes andtheir designers. It considersthe advantages and disad- vantagesof hexagons, using their designers’ own wordsand drawings. Introduction In the realmof urban design, hexagonalplanning istoday virtually an unknown phenomenon, amere oddityamong a vastarray of ideologies, theories and methods.It regularly goesunnoticed by studentsof city planning andurban history.Yet, for a period of almost30 years, between 1904and 1934, it caught the attentionof variousplanners, engineers andarchitects who saw in ita promisingpanacea for the city’splanning illsand a replacement forthe uniform rectangularstreet grid. Striving toestablish visionary and idealistic schemes for aperfect physicalenvironment that would also improve social conditions, these individualsadvocated their ideasin papers andprofessional presentations for overa quarterof acentury. Yetnone were able tobuild their planson a large scale.Why wasthis so? Was it because in reality,as on paper, hexagonslooked toofar-fetched tobe aworkablesolution? What about the theory’ssuggested cost-effectivenessand ef® cient landuse pattern;were notthey anincentive for construction? Such idealizedgeometrical schemes for city design often remained theoretical. There havebeen manymore ideal cities on paper thanon the ground.When they were built, these ideal communitieswere often short-livedin their pure state.They were overtakenby the realityof the wayin whichpeople behave under normalconditions. As Lynch (1984,p. 48)suggested, ªSettlement formis the spatialarrangement of personsdoing things,the resulting spatial¯ owsof persons,goods, and information, and the physicalfeatures which modify space in someway signi® cantto those actions, including enclosures,surfaces, chan- nels,ambience, andobjectsº . Eran Ben-Joseph,Department of Urban Studiesand Planning, Massachusetts Instituteof Technology,77 Massachusetts Ave,Cambridge, MA 02139,USA. Email: [email protected]. DavidGordon, Schoolof Urban andRegional Planning, Queen’s University,Ontario, Canada. 1357± 4809 Print/1469± 9664 Online/00/030237-29 Ó 2000 Taylor &Francis Ltd DOI:10.1080/ 13574800020006653 238 E.Ben-Joseph& D.Gordon Geometricplans emerged througha rationalprocess unrelated toideal-city concepts.While we mightview hexagonalplanning asone of thosefanciful approachesto city design, we shouldnot dismiss it entirely. The conceptual frameworkthat delineates hexagonalplanning anddesign isoutlined in this paper througha review of professionalpublications, historical precedents and archivalresearch. The articlemainly addresses hexagonal planning atthe neighbourhood andmetropolitan scale, and largely ignoresother interesting hexagonalschemes in architecture(Bijlmermeer, Amsterdam;Le Mirail,Tou- louse) ortraf® c engineering (Buchanan,1963). Hexagonal planning’ skey advo- catesand its historical context are describe chronologicallybelow. Geometricapproaches to the planning of townsand villages have many precedents in the formof ancientcities (Castagnoli, 1971). The rectangulargrid wasby farthe mostprevalent design, withexamples in China,India, Rome and Greece (Kostof,1991). Octagonal layouts were alsopopular forideal citiessuch asPalmanova,Italy (1593), and Hamina, Finland (1723)(Johnston, 1983). Wren’s proposalfor rebuilding Londonafter the GreatFire (1666)combined gridswith octagonaland hexagonal geometry, but itwas not built (Figure 1).A small portionof Woodward’s1807 hexagonal/ rectangulargrid plan forDetroit was built before the townabandoned the ideain the 1820s(Figure 2).The Edinburgh New Town(1795) and Goderich, Ontario (1829), successfully incorporateda rectangulargrid andoctagonal squares. These elegant diagramswere often the exceptionsto the rule of the rectangulargrid. The gridironplan wasmandated by ordinancesin the Spanish Lawsof the Indies, the French Bastilletowns, the UKbylawhousing estatesand the 19th-centuryNorth American land surveys. In NorthAmerica, most towns from Edmonton to Mexico City were laidout in someform of rectangulargrid (Reps, 1969).When the modernurban planning movementbegan aroundthe turnof the 20thcentury, thisgrid wasan obvious targetfor reform, since itwas regarded as monotonous, excessively paved and open tothrough traf® c (Southworth& Ben-Joseph, 1997). GardenCities andGarden Suburbs as Alternatives for Residential Neighbour- hoods (1899±1930) Ebenezer Howard’sin¯uential book Tomorrow:A PeacefulPath to RealReform (1898)contained now-famous diagrams proposing garden citiesin acircular form.Even Howardregarded these drawingsas theoretical illustrations of his concept.The designers of Letchworth(1903), the ®rstgarden city,were given a free hand.The winning design in the limited competitionfor Letchworth was prepared by RaymondUnwin andBarry Parker, two architects deeply involved in socialreform. Miller (1989)suggests that the semi-octagonaldesign of the proposedtown centre (Figure 3)seems inspired by Wren’sproposalfor the business districtof London.However, Unwin andParker’s smallhouse group- ings became farmore in¯ uential. They experimented withsmall crescents and cul-de-sacsfor inexpensive cottagesin Letchworth’sresidentialareas. Unwin andParker’s design forHampstead Garden Suburb (1907±1910) ex- tended thistheme of informallyplanned residentialareas with detailed site planning formiddle-class homes, based upon smallcrescents and cul-de-sacs. Frederick LawOlmsted, Jr, took a similarapproach for an early US garden suburb in ForestHills Garden, New York(1911). He combined smallgroups withthe graceful curvilineardesigns pioneered by hisfather in 1869at River- eaoa Hexagonal Planning Figure 1. Christopher Wren’s plan for rebuilding London, 1666. Source: Unwin (1909). 239 240 E.Ben-Joseph& D.Gordon Figure 2. Woodward’shexagonal/rectangulargrid plan forDetroit, 1807. Source: Cauchon(1927). side,near Chicago. The OlmstedBros. ® rmproduced scoresof curvilinear subdivisionsin the USA andCanada in the early 20thcentury. TheCity Beautifuland the Grid (1904±1920) One ofthe principal disadvantagesof the rectangulargrid isthe dif® culty of diagonalmovements, which make up alargeproportion of urban trips.Urban designers often attemptedto combine diagonalboulevards with a background grid,following the example ofL’Enfant’ splan forWashington, DC (1793),or CerdaÂ’s plan forthe BarcelonaEnsanche (1864). The diagonalParisian boule- vardscreated by BaronHaussmann in the late19th century were particularly in¯uential, perhaps because the Ecoledes Beaux Arts was the dominantarchitec- turalschool of the day.The classicalarchitectural and urban design idealsof the Ecolewere reintroducedto North America in the World’sColumbian Exposition atChicagoin 1893.The fair’splan, coordinated by Daniel Burnham,had a strong in¯uence upon urban design practicefor the next 20years. Its vision of immense,white neo-classicalbuildings facing naturalisticlandscapes and lagoonscreated a powerful imagewhich was widely reproduced in early photographicsouvenirs. Attemptsto recreate the fair’simage became knownas the CityBeautiful movement(Wilson, 1989). Burnham and Edward Bennett’ splansfor San Fran- cisco(1904) and Chicago (1909) combined the existingcity grids with neo-classi- calcivic centres at the focusof the new diagonalavenues. Washington, DC, revived L’Enfant’splan in 1903,and Philadelphia inserteda majordiagonal avenue, the FairmountParkway, into Penn’ s1692grid plan.However, few other citieswere able tofollow Haussmann’s lead in cuttingnew diagonalboulevards though anexisting urban fabric.They often lackedthe ®nancialresources and expropriationpowers required tomatch Paris’s programme. By 1910,the City Beautiful wasunder attackfor its impracticality and overly aesthetic approach HexagonalPlanning 241 Figure 3. HampsteadGarden Suburb’s courtsand cul-de-sacs, Unwin andParker, 1905. Source:Unwin (1909). toplanning (Olmsted,1911), although diagonal boulevards were important elements ofplans for national capitals on vacant sites, like Grif® n’s Canberra (1912)(Figure 4),and Lutyens andBaker’s New Delhi (1913)(Figure 5). In aGrandyet PrudentManner: Charles Lamb and Rudolf MuÈller, Hexagonal Plans(1904± 1910) Cityplanning anddesign became asubject ofinterest in manycircles of engineers, sociologists,artists and craftsmen. Hexagonal plans were advocated by aNew Yorkarchitect and a Viennese engineer during the ®rstdecade of the 20thcentury. The New Yorkarchitect and art historian Charles Lamb prepared ahexagonalplan in 1904.Lamb specialized in ecclesiasticaland memorial architecture,designing the MadisonSquare Archas well asthe courtof honour ofthe Hudson±Fulton Celebration in 1909.Lamb believed thatarts and crafts were anintegralpart of architecture and city planning. He frequently addressed the need tobeautify New YorkCity through sculptures, fountains and statues as well asthrough the planning anddesign of streetsand city blocks (Gilmartin,
Recommended publications
  • Welcome to LONDON TOWN SQUARE
    Welcome to LONDON TOWN SQUARE 3545 - 32nd Avenue NE, Calgary,AB Partnership. Performance. Josh Rahme | 403.232.4333 Hani Abdelkader | 403.232.4321 Morena Ianniello | 587.293.3367 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] © 2017, Avison Young Real Estate Alberta Inc. All rights reserved. The information contained herein was obtained from sources which we deem reliable and, while thought to be correct, is not guaranteed by Avison Young. LONDON TOWN SQUARE RETAIL SPACE FOR LEASE 3545 - 32 Avenue NE, Calgary,AB Particulars Highlights UNIT SIZE (SF) OCCUPANCY - 120,304 sf community shopping centre located 205 1,521 Nov 1, 2018 in the northeast quadrant of Calgary 210 544 Immediately - Strong tenant mix, including London Drugs, TD 225 1,482 July 1, 2018 Canada Trust, Starbucks, Penningtons, and Liquor 235 1,318 May 1, 2018 Depot 239 944 Nov 1, 2018 555 1,200 Immediately - Located at the southwest corner of 32nd Avenue and 36th Street NE Rental rates: Market - Exposure to 44,000 vehicles per day along 36th Street NE CAM: $7.84 psf (2018 est.) LONDON TOWN SQUARE - Shadow anchored by Sunridge Mall, the largest 32 AVENUE NE AND 36 STREET NE | 3431Tax: – 3545 32 AVENUE$6.09 NE, psf CALGARY, (2018 est.) AB mall in northeast Calgary (+850,000 GLA) Zoning: C - C2 KEYPLAN CONCEPTUALTerm: PLAN ONLY 5 - 10 years BARLOW AVAILABLE TRAIL NE WHITEHORN DRIVE NE 32 AVENUE NE 32 Avenue32 AVENUE NE NE (27,000 vpd) 36 STREET NE 26 AVENUE NE TOTAL SITE AREA 10.37 ACRES 1,200 SF TOTAL SITE GLA 120,307 sf TOTAL PARKING 595 SPACES 500 PARKING RATIO 4.95/1,000 555 505 TENANTS 610 605 603 553 510 100 LONDON DRUGS 24,081 sf 205 PHO HA VIENTNAMESE NOODLE 1,521 sf (44,000 vpd) 210 LEASING OPPORTUNITY 546 sf 1,482 SF 215 PENNINGTON’S STORAGE 531 SF 544 SF 220 DR.
    [Show full text]
  • Town Square Park Master Plan Public Hearing Draft
    TOWN SQUARE PARK MASTER PLAN PUBLIC HEARING DRAFT MAY 2019 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The Municipality of Anchorage Parks and Recreation Department and the planning team would like to recognize and thank all the individuals and organizations who have worked to create the Town Square Park Master Plan. A special thanks to the members of the Citizen and Technical Advisory Groups for their dedication, insight and assistance. MUNICIPALITY OF CITIZEN ADVISORY ANCHORAGE GROUP MEMBERS PHOTO CREDITS Ethan Berkowitz, Mayor Radhika Krishna Bettisworth North, Erik Jones: cover, contents, 1, 7, 9, 21, 22, 23, 25-26, 28, 30, 33, 37, 42, Chris Schutte, Director of Economic and Shannon Kuhn Community Development 49, 55, 57, 59, 60, 65, 77-78, 78, 85, 87 Dianne Holmes John Rodda, Director of Parks & Recreation Tayna Iden P&R Horticulture Department: 59, 83 Josh Durand, Parks Superintendent Nancy Harbour James Starzec MOA Parks and Recreation, Steve Rafuse: 3, Nina Bonito Romine 4, 7, 8, 11, 13, 14, 17-18, 23 24, 27, 28, 30, PLANNING TEAM Jennifer Richcreek 32, 33, 35, 41, 45, 53, 58, 60, 61-62, 65-66, John Blaine 66, 68, 69, 75, 77, 83, 89, 95, 100 MOA PARKS & RECREATION Darrel Hess Steve Rafuse, Project Manager R&M Consultants, Van Le: 34 BETTISWORTH NORTH TECHNICAL ADVISORS Anchorage Downtown Partnership: 5-6, 17, Mark Kimerer, Landscape Architect 43-44, 57, 79-80, 81-82 Erik Jones, Landscape Designer GROUP MEMBERS R&M CONSULTANTS Jamie Boring Van Le, Planner Elise Huggins Taryn Oleson, Planner Erin Baca Katie Chan, Graphic Designer Sandy Potvin Sharon Chamard
    [Show full text]
  • The Grid As Generator, by Leslie Martin 1972
    Ch08-H6531.qxd 11/7/06 1:47 PM Page 70 8 The grid as generator† Leslie Martin [1972] 1 planner, have nevertheless been profoundly influ- enced by Sitte’s doctrine of the visually ordered city. The activity called city planning, or urban design, or The doctrine has left its mark on the images that are just planning, is being sharply questioned. It is not used to illustrate high density development of cities. It simply that these questions come from those who is to be seen equally in the layout and arrangement of are opposed to any kind of planning. Nor is it because Garden City development. The predominance of the so many of the physical effects of planning seem to visual image is evident in some proposals that work be piecemeal. For example roads can be proposed for the preservation of the past: it is again evident in without any real consideration of their effect on the work of those that would carry us on, by an environment; the answer to such proposals could imagery of mechanisms, into the future. It remains be that they are just not planning at all. But it is not central in the proposals of others who feel that, just this type of criticism that is raised. The attack is although the city as a total work of art is unlikely to be more fundamental: what is being questioned is the achieved, the changing aspect of its streets and adequacy of the assumptions on which planning squares may be ordered visually into a succession of doctrine is based.
    [Show full text]
  • Lautenschlagerstraße 23, Stuttgart, Germany
    Lautenschlagerstraße 23, Stuttgart, Germany View this office online at: https://www.newofficeeurope.com/details/serviced-offices-lautenschlagerstra- e-23-stuttgart This business centre, located at Lautenschlagerstraße 23, Stuttgart, offers modern office accommodation which is available on highly flexible agreements. Rental periods can range from just a day to a month or more, making this a very attractive prospect for those who do not require a long term business commitment. Multilingual staff are on hand to provide a manned reception, mail handling and management support. The property includes meeting rooms, comfortable lounge, 24/7 access and secure parking. Transport links Nearest tube: Schloßplatz/Friedrichsbau Nearest railway station: Stattgart Nearest road: Schloßplatz/Friedrichsbau Nearest airport: Schloßplatz/Friedrichsbau Key features 24 hour access Access to multiple centres nation-wide Board room Caterer services available Close to railway station Comfortable lounge Conference rooms Flexible contracts Lift Meeting rooms Modern interiors Multilingual staff Near to subway / underground station On-site management support Postal facilities/mail handling Reception staff Secure car parking Training rooms available Unbranded offices Unfurnished Virtual office available WC (separate male & female) Location This business centre is located within just a few minutes’ walk of Stuttgart’s largest and most popular town square, Schloßplatz. From here you can easily access the wonderful shopping street of Königstraße – said to be the country’s longest pedestrianised street. The popular Königsbau Passagen shopping mall is also just minutes from the business centre. The local area includes numerous bars, cafés and restaurants and a great variety of other attractions including a number of museums, several parks and two castles.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 3 the Development of North American Cities
    CHAPTER 3 THE DEVELOPMENT OF NORTH AMERICAN CITIES THE COLONIAL F;RA: 1600-1800 Beginnings The Character of the Early Cities The Revolutionary War Era GROWTH AND EXPANSION: 1800-1870 Cities as Big Business To The Beginnings of Industrialization Am Urhan-Rural/North-South Tensions ace THE ERA OF THE GREAT METROPOLIS: of! 1870-1950 bui Technological Advance wh, The Great Migration cen Politics and Problems que The Quality of Life in the New Metropolis and Trends Through 1950 onl tee] THE NORTH AMERICAN CIITTODAY: urb 1950 TO THE PRESENT Can Decentralization oft: The Sun belt Expansion dan THE COMING OF THE POSTINDUSTRIAL CIIT sug) Deterioration' and Regeneration the The Future f The Human Cost of Economic Restructuring rath wor /f!I#;f.~'~~~~'A'~~~~ '~·~_~~~~Ji?l~ij:j hist. The Colonial Era Thi: fron Growth and Expansion coa~ The Great Metropolis Emerges to tJ New York Today new SUMMARY Nor CONCLUSION' T Am, cent EUf( izati< citie weal 62 Chapter 3 The Development of North American Cities 63 Come hither, and I will show you an admirable cities across the Atlantic in Europe. The forces Spectacle! 'Tis a Heavenly CITY ... A CITY to of postmedieval culture-commercial trade be inhabited by an Innumerable Company of An· and, shortly thereafter, industrial production­ geL" and by the Spirits ofJust Men .... were the primary shapers of urban settlement Put on thy beautiful garments, 0 America, the Holy City! in the United States and Canada. These cities, like the new nations themselves, began with -Cotton Mather, seventeenth· the greatest of hopes. Cotton Mather was so century preacher enamored of the idea of the city that he saw its American urban history began with the small growth as the fulfillment of the biblical town-five villages hacked out of the wilder· promise of a heavenly setting here on earth.
    [Show full text]
  • Garden Cities Located in What Now Are the Suburbs of Berlin
    focus | 2009 | volume VI 53 GAR D EN CITIES: LESSONS FROM GERMANY Kar L ECKE R T Karl Eckert is a senior at Ebenezer Howard’s lessons and the Garden City movement spread throughout Europe the BCRP program, City between the end of the 19th century and the beginning of the 20th. In this article, Karl Eckert and Regional Planning Department, Cal Poly. discusses the origins of the movement and the translation of the concept to Germany. During a recent trip, he visited and studied tSiemensstadt and Britz, two garden cities located in what now are the suburbs of Berlin. In reading the book Cities of Tomorrow by Sir Peter Hall, one comes to realize the profession of planning is a relatively new field of expertise. Modern day city planning stems from the early 1900’s when the societies of the developing world were dealing with the menace of the urban slum, a new phenomenon spurred by industrial forces and a rise in migratory populations to major city centers for employment. Developing ideas that would counter-attack this dire urban condition would soon define and establish what is known today as city planning. Life in the Slums Peter Hall’s Cities of Tomorrow elaborates on how, during the period of 1880 to 1920, major cities such as London, Berlin, Paris and New York experienced complications with slum populations. These cities exhibited high concentrations of poor residents within areas defined by the lack of physical maintenance, crowded conditions, disregard for sanitation, and general social decline. Andrew Figure 1 Mearns, a pamphlet writer of the time, described the slums of London with clarity: The Siemens factory, which was the main employment outlet “Few who read these pages have any conception of what these pestilential human rookeries for those living in are, where tens of thousands are crowded together amidst horrors which call to mind what we Seimensstadt.
    [Show full text]
  • 2010 CNU Charter Awards Book
    TENTH ANNIVERSARY CONGRESS FOR THE NEW URBANISM CHARTER 0 1 0 CNUAWARD S 2 It is with great pleasure that we present the results of the first CNU JACKY GRIMSHAW Charter Awards Program…The , Vice-President of Policy, Center for Neighborhood Technology, Chicago, Illinois; diversity of architectural design ELIZABETH MOULE , Principal, Moule Polyzoides approaches demonstrates that it Architects & Urbanists, Pasadena, California; is possible to seamlessly link new PAUL MURRAIN , Urban Designer and INTBAU Visiting development to its surroundings Professor at the University of Greenwich, London, in many ways. England; JOE DISTEFANO , Principal, Calthorpe Ray Gindroz, Jury Chair 2001 Associates, Berkeley, California: MAGGIE CONNOR , Principal, Urban Design Associates, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; VINCE GRAHAM , JURY CHAIR , Founder, I’On Group, Charleston, South Carolina; DANA BEACH , Executive Director, Coastal Conservation League, Charleston, South Carolina 2010 MARKS THE TENTH YEAR OF THE CHARTER AWARDS. I had the honor of chairing a jury which included CNU Founders and current board members, veterans of past juries, and young designers new to the task. Members ably represented This year’s Charter Awards provide Given the growing alertness to reassuring evidence that these prin - TENTH ANNIVERSARY the community of competence which is the Congress for the New Urbanism. Bringing global climate change, our incipient ciples are widely understood and holistic knowledge and a passion for excellence, we met through a winter tempest in post-peak-oil era, and the turbulent economic times, we expanded our serving as the foundation for excel - CONGRESS FOR THE NEW URBANISM Charleston to review just under 100 projects. Submittals were down from recent years, lent work…The scope of the projects judging criteria, seeking…glimpses that received awards demonstrates but what we lacked in quantity was more than made up for in quality and sophistica - of a more sensible future, looking to that the New Urbanism goes well tion.
    [Show full text]
  • Planned Communities
    Planned Communities ROBERT C. WEAVER, Administrator, Housing and Home Finance Agency •WRITING IN the New York Times, Columnist James Reston recently noted that, "In a fit of exuberance or absentmindedness we have increased the population of the United States by over 50 million since 1945." As we all know, the exuberance and absentmindedness of which Reston spoke is con­ tinuing, and at such a pace that by the time the children of the past 15 years are grand­ parents, there will be another 125 million or so Americans. Morever, at least 85 per­ cent of the 300 million people in the nation will be living in urban places by the year 2000. This growth is the most portentous single fact of our time-always excepting the thermonuclear threat. It means that in the next 40 years we will have to build as much housing, industry, highways and related development as we have built in our previous history. And it means, moreover, that the amount of land consumed by urbanization will be at least double the acreage now urbanized. This tremendous population surge will be accommodated largely in what we today consider the metropolitan fringe, and, in many cases, in undeveloped or argricultural lands even farther out. By 2000, Megalopolis will be a fact, certainly the fast-growing East Coast "super-city" stretching from Boston to Richmond and the West Coast area b etween San Francisco and San Diego will appear, in another 40 years, as continuous urbanized places. The previous 40 years of metropolitan growth has produced a phenomenon variously know as "Spread City," "urban sprawl" and "slurbs." In other words, much of our suburban development heretofore has been a mess.
    [Show full text]
  • The Queen C Ity
    A Regional Action Plan for Downtown Buffalo Volume 1 – Overview Hub The Context for Decision Making The Queen City Anthony M. Masiello, MAYOR WWW. CITY- BUFFALO. COM November 2003 Downtown Buffalo 2002! DEDICATION To people everywhere who love Buffalo, NY and continue to make it an even better place to live life well. Program Sponsors: Funding for the Downtown Buffalo 2002! program and The Queen City Hub: Regional Action Plan for Downtown Buffalo was provided by four foundations and the City of Buffalo and supported by substantial in-kind services from the University at Buffalo, School of Architecture and Planning’s Urban Design Project and Buffalo Place Inc. Foundations: The John R. Oishei Foundation, The Margaret L. Wendt Foundation, The Baird Foundation, The Community Foundation for Greater Buffalo City of Buffalo: Buffalo Urban Renewal Agency Published by the City of Buffalo WWW. CITY- BUFFALO. COM October 2003 A Regional Action Plan for Downtown Buffalo Hub Volume 1 – Overview The Context for Decision Making The Queen City Anthony M. Masiello, MAYOR WWW. CITY- BUFFALO. COM October 2003 Downtown Buffalo 2002! The Queen City Hub Buffalo is both “the city of no illusions” and the Queen City of the Great Lakes. The Queen City Hub Regional Action Plan accepts the tension between these two assertions as it strives to achieve its practical ideals. The Queen City Hub: A Regional Action Plan for Downtown Buffalo is the product of continuing concerted civic effort on the part of Buffalonians to improve the Volume I – Overview, The Context for center of their city. The effort was led by the Decision Making is for general distribution Office of Strategic Planning in the City of and provides a specific context for decisions Buffalo, the planning staff at Buffalo Place about Downtown development.
    [Show full text]
  • Designing Planned Communities Is a Clear Statement of the Design Issues That Are Critical to Creating Livable and Well-Designed Planned Communities
    URBAN DEVELOPMENT DESIGNING PLANNED Th e compositional form of most planned communities defi nes their development struc- ture. Th ey became popular because of development problems that arose under traditional zoning and subdivision regulations, which did not originally include this concept. Th e zoning ordinance regulates land uses and lot sizes. Th e subdivision ordinance regulates DESIGNING PLANNED street and block layouts and requires developers to provide public infrastructure such as streets, sewers, and other utilities. Th ere is a gap here. Neither ordinance gives designers or developers the fl exibility to design a planned community that includes common open space, resource protection, and better and varied design. Th is book shows how to design COMMUNITIES planned communities that overcome these problems. “Designing Planned Communities is a clear statement of the design issues that are critical to creating livable and well-designed planned communities. Professor Man- delker draws on his long experience with planned community and land use regula- tion to explain the meaning of good design for planned communities. He shows how design concepts for planned communities can be translated into effective de- COMMUNITIES sign guidance by local governments. Examples of design standards are provided from comprehensive plans, design guidelines, design manuals, and planned community regulations. Throughout Designing Planned Communities, the reader is taken through the complex problems of design regulation to an eff ective design program that can create planned communities in which we want to live. Planners and lawyers will be interested in what Mandelker has to say about the design issues facing a growing number of planned communities throughout the country.
    [Show full text]
  • Main-Street-Antique-Guide.Pdf
    71277_antique guide.qxd 4/1/14 8:37 AM Page 1 Outside the Main Street promenade from 5. The original “Goldie’s Window” and wine storage cabinets; the unique sideboard Fremont Street This outstanding example of Victorian stained glass niche includes panels which depict characters and 1. The Blackhawk • Private Car 92, artistry originally graced Ms. Goldie Schiesser’s home in morals of Aesop’s Fables. the Private Rail Car used by St. Joseph, Missouri. Goldie refused to sell the window, 12. The Louisa Alcott uide Buffalo Bill. until finally an art dealer from Aspen, Colorado agreed This Pullman parlor car was Buffalo Bill Cody used this car to travel to buy the entire home. This is the original window built by the Pullman Company which was later reproduced by stained glass artist Mark to with his Wild West Show from 1906 until his in 1927, and was one in a death in 1917. Bogenrief. His replicas are located at several locations series of cars named for The car was built in 1903 by the Pullman throughout Main Street Station. women authors and poets. Palace Car Company, as the private car for 6. Fluted Columns from the Windsor Barracks. The car has been refurbished the president of the Chicago, Burlington & These cast iron columns originally supported the to provide an elegant cigar- Quincy Railroad. The interior contains a sitting room Barracks which housed the Army guards of the British Throne smoking lounge. with sleeping berths, a dining room, kitchen, and a in London, England. 13. Chandeliers from the Coca-Cola Building, bathroom with showers.
    [Show full text]
  • A Student's Guide to Study Abroad in Brussels
    A STUDENT’S GUIDE TO STUDY ABROAD IN BRUSSELS Prepared by the Center for Global Education CONTENTS Section 1: Nuts and Bolts 1.1 Contact Information & Emergency Contact Information 1.2 Program Participant List 1.3 Term Calendar 1.4 Passport & Visas 1.5 Power of Attorney/Medical Release 1.6 International Student Identity Card 1.7 Register to Vote 1.8 Travel Dates/Group Arrival 1.9 Orientation 1.10 What to Bring Section 2: Studying & Living Abroad 2.1 Academics Abroad 2.2 Money and Banking 2.3 Housing and Meals Abroad 2.4 Service Abroad 2.5 Email Access 2.6 Travel Tips Section 3: All About Culture 3.1 Experiential Learning: What it’s all about 3.2 Adjusting to a New Culture 3.3 Culture Learning: Customs and Values Section 4: Health and Safety 4.1 Safety Abroad: A Framework 4.2 Health Care and Insurance 4.3 Women’s Issues Abroad 4.4 HIV 4.5 Drugs 4.6 Traffic 4.7 Politics 4.8 Voting by Absentee Ballot Section 5: Coming Back 5.1 Registration & Housing 5.2 Reentry and Readjustment SECTION 1: Nuts and Bolts 1.1 CONTACT INFORMATION PROGRAM DIRECTOR IN BRUSSELS Dr. Virginie Goffaux Study Abroad Director Vesalius College Mailing address: Pleinlaan 2 1050 Brussels, Belgium Visiting Address: Triomflaan 32 1160 Brussels, Belgium Email: [email protected] Tel: +32 2 629 28 26 Cell: + 32 496 10 97 51 Fax: +32 2 880 12 51 24/7 Emergency cell phone: +32 473 881 221 CONTACT FOR HOUSING ISSUES Note: when dialing from the U.S.
    [Show full text]