DOCSLIB.ORG

Green Power Marketing Abroad: Recent Experience and Trends

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Green Power Marketing Abroad: Recent Experience and Trends May 2002 • NREL/TP-620-32155 Green Power Marketing Abroad: Recent Experience and Trends Lori Bird National Renewable Energy Laboratory Rolf Wüstenhagen University of St. Gallen (Switzerland) Jørn Aabakken National Renewable Energy Laboratory National Renewable Energy Laboratory 1617 Cole Boulevard Golden, Colorado 80401-3393 NREL is a U.S. Department of Energy Laboratory Operated by Midwest Research Institute • Battelle • Bechtel Contract No. DE-AC36-99-GO10337 May 2002 • NREL/TP-620-32155 Green Power Marketing Abroad: Recent Experience and Trends Lori Bird National Renewable Energy Laboratory Rolf Wüstenhagen University of St. Gallen (Switzerland) Jørn Aabakken National Renewable Energy Laboratory Prepared under Task No. AS72.1006 National Renewable Energy Laboratory 1617 Cole Boulevard Golden, Colorado 80401-3393 NREL is a U.S. Department of Energy Laboratory Operated by Midwest Research Institute • Battelle • Bechtel Contract No. DE-AC36-99-GO10337 NOTICE This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States government. Neither the United States government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States government or any agency thereof. Available electronically at http://www.osti.gov/bridge Available for a processing fee to U.S. Department of Energy and its contractors, in paper, from: U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information P.O. Box 62 Oak Ridge, TN 37831-0062 phone: 865.576.8401 fax: 865.576.5728 email: [email protected] Available for sale to the public, in paper, from: U.S. Department of Commerce National Technical Information Service 5285 Port Royal Road Springfield, VA 22161 phone: 800.553.6847 fax: 703.605.6900 email: [email protected] online ordering: http://www.ntis.gov/ordering.htm Printed on paper containing at least 50% wastepaper, including 20% postconsumer waste Acknowledgments This work was funded by the U.S. Department of Energy’s (DOE) Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. The authors also wish to thank the following reviewers for their thoughtful comments and suggestions: Allan Andersen of the Danish Society for the Conservation of Nature, Tore Brænd of the Norwegian Society for the Preservation of Nature, Paula Cribb of the Sustainable Energy Development Authority (Australia), Jon Dogterom of the Pembina Institute (Canada), Heddeke Heijnes of Greenprices (The Netherlands), Anne Louise Koefoed of the Norwegian School of Management, Sven Frauenfelder of Linder Kommunikation (Switzerland), Theresa Howland of Enmax (Canada), Tomas Kaberger of Ecotraffic (Sweden), Gero Lücking of Lichtblick (Germany), Maja Marlier of the ICHEC Business School (Belgium), Mika Ohbayashi of the Institute for Sustainable Energy Policies (Japan), Eveline Steinberger of Verbund (Austria), Ursula Stocker and Cornelia Brandes of Naturemade (Switzerland), Sven Teske of Greenpeace Energy (Germany), Sirkka Tepponen of the Finnish Association for Nature Conservation, Elaine Waterson of the Energy Saving Trust (United Kingdom), and Blair Swezey and Larry Goldstein of the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL). The authors would also like to thank Caroline Hopkins of the Swedish Society for Nature Conservation, Philip Lewis of the University of Vaasa (Finland), and Andrew Pape-Salmon of the Pembina Institute (Canada) for information they provided for early drafts. Lastly, the authors wish to thank Barbara Kündig for research support and Michelle Kubik of NREL for her editorial review. Acknowledgments ...................................................................1 Executive Summary.................................................................4 Introduction..............................................................................8 Method............................................................................................................... 9 Organization of the report .................................................................................. 9 Australia .................................................................................13 Power Industry Overview ................................................................................. 13 Green Power Marketing Activity....................................................................... 13 Policies Affecting the Green Power Market...................................................... 16 Outlook ............................................................................................................ 17 Canada....................................................................................18 Power Market Overview................................................................................... 18 Green Power Marketing Activity....................................................................... 18 Policies Affecting the Green Power Market...................................................... 21 Outlook ............................................................................................................ 21 Finland ....................................................................................22 Power Industry Overview ................................................................................. 22 Green Power Marketing Activity....................................................................... 22 Policies Affecting the Green Power Market...................................................... 23 Outlook ............................................................................................................ 24 Germany .................................................................................25 Power Industry Overview ................................................................................. 25 Green Power Marketing Activity....................................................................... 25 Policies Affecting the Green Power Market...................................................... 29 Outlook ............................................................................................................ 29 Japan ......................................................................................30 Power Market Overview................................................................................... 30 Green Power Marketing Activity....................................................................... 30 Policies Affecting the Green Power Market...................................................... 31 Outlook ............................................................................................................ 31 The Netherlands.....................................................................32 Power Market Overview................................................................................... 32 Green Power Marketing Activity....................................................................... 32 Public Policy Support for the Green Power Market .......................................... 35 Outlook ............................................................................................................ 36 Sweden ...................................................................................37 Power Industry Overview ................................................................................. 37 Green Power Marketing Activity....................................................................... 37 2 Policies Affecting the Green Power Market...................................................... 40 Outlook ............................................................................................................ 40 Switzerland.............................................................................41 Power Market Overview................................................................................... 41 Green Power Marketing Activity....................................................................... 41 Policies Affecting the Green Power Market...................................................... 44 Outlook ............................................................................................................ 44 United Kingdom .....................................................................45 Power Market Overview................................................................................... 45 Green Power Marketing Activity....................................................................... 45 Policies Affecting the Green Power Market...................................................... 48 Outlook ............................................................................................................ 48 Other Countries......................................................................49 Austria.............................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Plugging Ontario Into a Green Future a Renewable Is Doable Action Plan
    Plugging Ontario Into A Green Future A Renewable is Doable Action Plan Cherise Burda, THE PEMBINA INSTITUTE and Roger Peters NOVEMBER 2008 CANADIAN ENVIRONMENTAL LAW ASSOCIATION L’ASSOCIATION CANADIENNE DU DROIT DE L’ENVIRONNEMENT Plugging Ontario Into A Green Future A RENEWABLE IS DOABLE ACTION PLAN Cherise Burda, The Pembina Institute and Roger Peters NOVEMBER 2008 CANADIAN ENVIRONMENTAL LAW ASSOCIATION L’ASSOCIATION CANADIENNE DU DROIT DE L’ENVIRONNEMENT Burda, Cherise and Peters, Roger Plugging Ontario into a Green Future 1st Edition, published November 2008 Printed in Canada Production management: Lori Chamberland Editor: Margaret Chandler Design/Layout: J & W Communications Cover Photo: National Renewable Energy Laboratory ©2008 The Pembina Foundation ISBN 1-897390-17-3 For more information about this report please contact The Pembina Institute Suite 415 - 215 Spadina Avenue Toronto, Ontario Canada, M5T 2C7 Phone: 416-644-1016 Email: [email protected] Download additional copies of this publication from the Pembina Institute website: www.pembina.org and renewableisdoable.com. About Renewable s Renewable Is Doable is a joint inititative of the Pembina Institute Is Doable and World Wildlife Fund. It has now grown to include the David Suzuki Foundation, Greenpeace, Sierra Club and the Canadian Environmental Law Association. For more information about this publication and the Renewable is Doable campaign visit www.renewableisdoable.com. CANADIAN ENVIRONMENTAL LAW ASSOCIATION L’ASSOCIATION CANADIENNE DU DROIT DE L’ENVIRONNEMENT i i P L U G G I N G ONTARIO INTO A GREEN FUTURE s About the Cherise Burda Lead Authors Cherise joined Pembina after over 14 years working on environ- mental policy and legislative solutions in British Columbia.
    [Show full text]
  • The Next Frontier for Climate Action Decarbonizing Urban Freight in Canada
    The next frontier for climate action Decarbonizing urban freight in Canada Maddy Ewing, Carolyn Kim, Janelle Lee, Cedric Smith February 2020 updated July 2020 The next frontier for climate action About the Pembina Institute Decarbonizing urban freight in Canada The Pembina Institute is a national non-partisan think tank that advocates for strong, effective policies to All photos by Roberta Franchuk, Pembina Institute, unless support Canada’s clean energy transition. We employ otherwise indicated. multi-faceted and highly collaborative approaches to ©2020 The Pembina Institute change. Producing credible, evidence-based research and analysis, we consult directly with organizations All rights reserved. Permission is granted to reproduce all or to design and implement clean energy solutions, and part of this publication for non-commercial purposes, as long convene diverse sets of stakeholders to identify and as you cite the source. move toward common solutions. Recommended citation: Maddy Ewing, Carolyn Kim, Janelle Lee, Cedric Smith. The next frontier for climate action: Decarbonizing urban freight in Canada, The Pembina Institute, 2020. Additional copies of this publication may be downloaded from the Pembina Institute website, www.pembina.org. ———————————————————— pembina.org ———————————————————— twitter.com/pembina facebook.com/pembina.institute Contents The next frontier for climate action. 3 Businesses, municipalities act on climate. .5 Vancouver . 7 Calgary. .8 Edmonton . 9 Greater Toronto and Hamilton Area . .10 Ottawa. 11 Montreal. .12 Halifax. .13 Benefits of better urban freight management. 14 Key challenges to improving goods movement in cities. 16 Urban freight solutions. .17 Alternative delivery modes. .17 Alternative delivery models and technologies . 18 Recommendations. .20 2 The next frontier for climate action: Urban freight in Canada The next frontier for climate action Decarbonizing urban freight in Canada The world is at a climate tipping point.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Energy in the 21St Century: a Primer
    U.S. Energy in the 21st Century: A Primer March 16, 2021 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov R46723 SUMMARY R46723 U.S. Energy in the 21st Century: A Primer March 16, 2021 Since the start of the 21st century, the U.S. energy system has changed tremendously. Technological advances in energy production have driven changes in energy consumption, and Melissa N. Diaz, the United States has moved from being a net importer of most forms of energy to a declining Coordinator importer—and a net exporter in 2019. The United States remains the second largest producer and Analyst in Energy Policy consumer of energy in the world, behind China. Overall energy consumption in the United States has held relatively steady since 2000, while the mix of energy sources has changed. Between 2000 and 2019, consumption of natural gas and renewable energy increased, while oil and nuclear power were relatively flat and coal decreased. In the same period, production of oil, natural gas, and renewables increased, while nuclear power was relatively flat and coal decreased. Overall energy production increased by 42% over the same period. Increases in the production of oil and natural gas are due in part to technological improvements in hydraulic fracturing and horizontal drilling that have facilitated access to resources in unconventional formations (e.g., shale). U.S. oil production (including natural gas liquids and crude oil) and natural gas production hit record highs in 2019. The United States is the largest producer of natural gas, a net exporter, and the largest consumer. Oil, natural gas, and other liquid fuels depend on a network of over three million miles of pipeline infrastructure.
    [Show full text]
  • Powering Ahead! Making Sense of Business Models in Electric Vehicle Charging
    Powering ahead! Making sense of business models in electric vehicle charging October 2018 In association with Contents Acknowledgements 1 Foreword from Energy UK 2 Setting the scene 4 Our approach 5 Key findings 6 How the charging market stacks up 11 Where does charging take place and 14 how does it work? Bringing your business model to life 26 Deep dive on business models 28 What should you do next? 33 Strategy& is PwC’s global strategy consulting team. We help you transform your business by creating strategy that starts with your greatest strengths and builds in execution at every step. We call this strategy that works, and it delivers immediate impact and lasting value for you. As part of the PwC network, we combine 100 years of strategy consulting experience with PwC’s deep industry and functional capabilities. PwC has more than 250,000 people in 158 countries committed to delivering quality in assurance, tax, and advisory services. Acknowledgements To research and fully understand the constantly evolving landscape that is the electric vehicle charging market, we had the good fortune to speak to a number of companies and individuals who are at the very heart of this transformation. We would like to thank everyone who contributed to the report for their insights and time. Addison Lee – Andrew Wescott and Justin Patterson Chargemaster – Tom Callow Ecotricity – Mark Meyrick EDF Energy – Roy Collins ELEXON – Kevin Spencer Elsden Consultants – Miles Elsden Energy UK – Sam Hollister InstaVolt – Tim Payne National Grid – Graeme Cooper and Thomas Maidonis Ovo Energy – Tom Packenham Pivot Power – Matt Allen Pod Point – James McKemey ScottishPower – Malcom Paterson Tesla Western Power Distribution – Ben Godfrey Powering ahead! Making sense of business models in electric vehicle charging 1 Foreword from Energy UK Lawrence Slade Chief Executive I am delighted to work with PwC to bring their insight to investigating the market dynamics of The EV revolution is already upon us.
    [Show full text]
  • Your Guide to Going Green
    YOUR GUIDE TO GOING GREEN An Energy Toolkit for Hospitality In partnership with Ecotricity Sustainable Restaurant Association What’s Purpose 3 Understanding the energy market 4 inside Tariffs 4 Other terms 5 Process 7 this Price 10 People 11 Five actions you can take 12 guide References 13 Carbon Emissions = Climate Change 2 Your Guide to Going Green Linking energy more closely to the food, service and Electricity and gas: all foodservice businesses use one, if not both, to store and cook food, ventilate and light their space. Energy use accounts for 4-6% of daily operating costs for the average food service business, space while constituting a significant environmental impact too. A 20% reduction in energy use can represent the same benefit as a 5% increase in sales. This toolkit aims to help you build an energy policy that drives down the carbon footprint of your business and give you the lowdown on green energy to support you in making the switch. Energy is everywhere in your business, On an annual basis the from the embedded energy required to produce food to the running of fridges, British hospitality in- stoves and gas rings, lighting, ventilation, dustry produces more and even the fuel from the truck that carbon emissions than comes to empty the bins. This energy the entire country of leaves a carbon footprint, contributing to Costa Rica. global emissions, bit by bit. On an annual basis, the British hospitality industry produces more carbon emissions than Costa Rica. Burning fossil fuels such as coal and natural gas has provided much of humanity’s energy needs since the Industrial Revolution, but that’s changing in a big way.
    [Show full text]
  • Hydroelectric Power -- What Is It? It=S a Form of Energy … a Renewable Resource
    INTRODUCTION Hydroelectric Power -- what is it? It=s a form of energy … a renewable resource. Hydropower provides about 96 percent of the renewable energy in the United States. Other renewable resources include geothermal, wave power, tidal power, wind power, and solar power. Hydroelectric powerplants do not use up resources to create electricity nor do they pollute the air, land, or water, as other powerplants may. Hydroelectric power has played an important part in the development of this Nation's electric power industry. Both small and large hydroelectric power developments were instrumental in the early expansion of the electric power industry. Hydroelectric power comes from flowing water … winter and spring runoff from mountain streams and clear lakes. Water, when it is falling by the force of gravity, can be used to turn turbines and generators that produce electricity. Hydroelectric power is important to our Nation. Growing populations and modern technologies require vast amounts of electricity for creating, building, and expanding. In the 1920's, hydroelectric plants supplied as much as 40 percent of the electric energy produced. Although the amount of energy produced by this means has steadily increased, the amount produced by other types of powerplants has increased at a faster rate and hydroelectric power presently supplies about 10 percent of the electrical generating capacity of the United States. Hydropower is an essential contributor in the national power grid because of its ability to respond quickly to rapidly varying loads or system disturbances, which base load plants with steam systems powered by combustion or nuclear processes cannot accommodate. Reclamation=s 58 powerplants throughout the Western United States produce an average of 42 billion kWh (kilowatt-hours) per year, enough to meet the residential needs of more than 14 million people.
    [Show full text]
  • Power Electronics for Distributed Energy Systems and Transmission and Distribution Applications
    ORNL/TM-2005/230 POWER ELECTRONICS FOR DISTRIBUTED ENERGY SYSTEMS AND TRANSMISSION AND DISTRIBUTION APPLICATIONS L. M. Tolbert T. J. King B. Ozpineci J. B. Campbell G. Muralidharan D. T. Rizy A. S. Sabau H. Zhang* W. Zhang* Y. Xu* H. F. Huq* H. Liu* December 2005 *The University of Tennessee-Knoxville ORNL/TM-2005/230 Engineering Science and Technology Division POWER ELECTRONICS FOR DISTRIBUTED ENERGY SYSTEMS AND TRANSMISSION AND DISTRIBUTION APPLICATIONS L. M. Tolbert T. J. King B. Ozpineci J. B. Campbell G. Muralidharan D. T. Rizy A. S. Sabau H. Zhang W. Zhang Y. Xu H. F. Huq H. Liu Publication Date: December 2005 Prepared by the OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORY Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831 managed by UT-BATTELLE, LLC for the U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Under contract DE-AC05-00OR22725 DOCUMENT AVAILABILITY Reports produced after January 1, 1996, are generally available free via the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Information Bridge. Web site http://www.osti.gov/bridge Not available externally. Reports are available to DOE employees, DOE contractors, Energy Technology Data Exchange (ETDE) representatives, and International Nuclear Information System (INIS) representatives from the following source. Office of Scientific and Technical Information P.O. Box 62 Oak Ridge, TN 37831 Telephone 865-576-8401 Fax 865-576-5728 E-mail [email protected] Web site http://www.osti.gov/contact.html This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights.
    [Show full text]
  • Post-EPIRA Impacts of Electric Power Industry Competition Policies
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Navarro, Adoracion M.; Detros, Keith C.; Dela Cruz, Kirsten J. Working Paper Post-EPIRA impacts of electric power industry competition policies PIDS Discussion Paper Series, No. 2016-15 Provided in Cooperation with: Philippine Institute for Development Studies (PIDS), Philippines Suggested Citation: Navarro, Adoracion M.; Detros, Keith C.; Dela Cruz, Kirsten J. (2016) : Post-EPIRA impacts of electric power industry competition policies, PIDS Discussion Paper Series, No. 2016-15, Philippine Institute for Development Studies (PIDS), Quezon City This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/173536 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. may exercise further usage rights as specified in the indicated licence. www.econstor.eu Philippine Institute for Development Studies Surian sa mga Pag-aaral Pangkaunlaran ng Pilipinas Post-EPIRA Impacts of Electric Power Industry Competition Policies Adoracion M.
    [Show full text]
  • View Members of the Access and Forward Looking Task Forces Here
    Organisation Name Email address Task Force Stakeholder Group Forward-Looking Citizens Advice Andy Pace [email protected] Consumer representatives charges Energy Intensive Users Forward-Looking Jeremy Nicholson [email protected] Consumer representatives Group charges Forward-Looking Energy Local Mary Gillie [email protected] Local energy groups charges Forward-Looking Centrica Tim Collins [email protected] Large generators and suppliers charges Forward-Looking Npower (supplier) Daniel Hickman [email protected] Large generators and suppliers charges Scottish Power Energy Forward-Looking Joe Dunn [email protected] Large generators and suppliers Management charges Forward-Looking SSE plc John Tindal [email protected] Large generators and suppliers charges Forward-Looking Good Energy Tom Steward [email protected] Small suppliers charges Forward-Looking BUUK (IDNO) Michael Harding [email protected] Network companies charges Electricity North West Forward-Looking Chris Barker [email protected] Network companies Limited charges Forward-Looking National Grid Louise Schmitz [email protected] Network companies charges Forward-Looking Northern Powergrid Andrew Enzor [email protected] Network companies charges Scottish and Southern Forward-Looking Nigel Bessant [email protected] Network companies Electricity Networks charges Forward-Looking UK Power Networks Chris Ong [email protected] Network companies charges Association for
    [Show full text]
  • Greenwashing Vs. Renewable Energy Generation
    Greenwashing Vs. Renewable energy generation: which energy companies are making a real difference? Tackling the climate crisis requires that we reduce the UK’s carbon footprint. As individuals an important way we can do this is to reduce our energy use. This reduces our carbon footprints. We can also make sure: • All the electricity we use is generated renewably in the UK. • The energy company we give our money to only deals in renewable electricity. • That the company we are with actively supports the development of new additional renewable generation in the UK. 37% of UK electricity now comes from renewable energy, with onshore and offshore wind generation rising by 7% and 20% respectively since 2018. However, we don’t just need to decarbonise 100% of our electricity. If we use electricity for heating and transport, we will need to generate much more electricity – and the less we use, the less we will need to generate. REGOs/GoOs – used to greenwash. This is how it works: • If an energy generator (say a wind or solar farm) generates one megawatt hour of electricity they get a REGO (Renewable Energy Guarantee of Origin). • REGOs are mostly sold separately to the actual energy generated and are extremely cheap – about £1.50 for a typical household’s annual energy use. • This means an energy company can buy a megawatt of non-renewable energy, buy a REGO for one megawatt of renewable energy (which was actually bought by some other company), and then claim their supply is renewable even though they have not supported renewable generation in any way.
    [Show full text]
  • Powering Alberta's Future with Renewable Energy
    FACT SHEET Powering Alberta’s Future with Renewable Energy Alberta’s sustainable electricity resources could replace coal in 20 years Clean, renewable and transitional energy resources in Alberta are more than capable of meeting future demand in the province, even if electricity consumption doubles over the next 20 years. Alberta can harness this energy with proven technologies already in use in Alberta and elsewhere. David Dodge, The Pembina Institute Although Alberta was Canada’s leading wind David Dodge, The Pembina Institute energy producer for many years, in 2008 both Will Alberta’s future Ontario and Quebec surpassed it. In spite of 15 years of wind development, Alberta still takes be green or brown? advantage of less than 1% of the estimated total wind energy potential in the province. Albertans face a choice: Do we want to build a future with clean, efficient, sustainable electricity sources or do we want to continue using the old, wasteful, polluting systems A model of efficiency that are increasingly obsolete? In 1999, Texas became one of the first Changing our electricity system will be jurisdictions to introduce mandatory energy Alberta’s electricity system, which is challenging, but renewable and transitional savings goals for utilities. As required, based primarily on coal, is the dirtiest in energy options offer a phenomenal business electric utilities there have successfully Canada and among the most polluting of opportunity for Albertans. Markets will met 10% of the annual growth in demand any jurisdiction in the world. increasingly favour renewable energy as through energy efficiency instead of society forces existing companies to bear the building new facilities.
    [Show full text]
  • The Energy Tariff Greenwash They're Growing in Popularity
    THE ENERGY TARIFF GREENWASH They’re growing in popularity, but are renewable electricity tariffs offering what customers expect? Sarah Ingrams exposes unclear claims and busts myths to help you choose a supplier with green credentials you’re happy with 20 WHICH? MAGAZINE OCTOBER 2019 GREEN ENERGY f you’re attracted to it through the lines to your the idea of a renewable property’ – at best an example THE ELECTRICITY I energy tariff to do your of staff ignorance. bit for the environment, YOU USE TO POWER a quick comparison suggests Unclear claims YOUR APPLIANCES you’ve got plenty of choice. When Myths aside, there are big we analysed the 355 tariffs on the differences in what companies do IS THE SAME AS market, more than half claimed to support renewable generation renewable electricity credentials. but it’s not always clear from their YOUR NEIGHBOUR’S, Three years ago it was just 9%. The websites. When Good Energy cheapest will cost you around £500 states ‘we match the power you use REGARDLESS OF THE less than the priciest, per year. But in a year with electricity generated you may be shocked to find out the from sun, wind and water’, it TARIFF YOU’RE ON differences between them. means it buys electricity directly In a survey of almost 4,000 from renewable generators to people in late 2018, a third told match customer use for 90% of us that if an energy tariff is marked half-hour units throughout the year. ‘green’ or ‘renewable’, they expect But similar-sounding claims from that 100% renewable electricity is others don’t mean the same thing.
    [Show full text]