DOCSLIB.ORG

13190500 SOUTH FORK BOISE RIVER at ANDERSON RANCH DAM, ID Middle Snake-Boise Basin South Fork Boise Subbasin

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
13190500 SOUTH FORK BOISE RIVER at ANDERSON RANCH DAM, ID Middle Snake-Boise Basin South Fork Boise Subbasin Water-Data Report 2011 13190500 SOUTH FORK BOISE RIVER AT ANDERSON RANCH DAM, ID Middle Snake-Boise Basin South Fork Boise Subbasin LOCATION.--Lat 43°20′37″, long 115°28′39″ referenced to North American Datum of 1983, in SW ¼ sec.11, T.1 S., R.8 E., Elmore County, ID, Hydrologic Unit 17050113, Anderson Ranch Dam quad., Boise National Forest, on right bank 600 ft upstream from Dixie Creek, 1.8 mi downstream from Anderson Ranch Dam, 2.2 mi northwest of Bennett, and at mile 41.5. DRAINAGE AREA.--978 mi². SURFACE-WATER RECORDS PERIOD OF RECORD.--April 1943 to current year (includes flow of Dixie Creek prior to October 1946). REVISED RECORDS.--WDR-US-2010: Drainage area. GAGE.--Water-stage recorder. Datum of gage is 3,830.0 ft above NGVD of 1929. REMARKS.--No estimated daily discharges. Records good. Station equipment includes satellite telemetry. Flow regulated by Anderson Ranch Reservoir, 1.8 mi upstream (see station 13190000) beginning Dec. 15, 1945. Flow of Little Camas Creek is stored in Little Camas Reservoir, capacity, 22,300 acre- ft, no spill most years, and diverted out of basin through Little Camas Canal for irrigation of about 5,000 acres (1966 determination). EXTREMES FOR PERIOD OF RECORD.--Maximum discharge, 9,850 ft³/s May 25, 1956, gage height, 10.56 ft; minimum, 0.10 ft³/s Nov. 13, 1959; minimum gage height, 0.99 ft, Feb. 16, 1950. EXTREMES FOR CURRENT YEAR.--Maximum discharge, 3,980 ft³/s May 20 and June 6, gage height, 7.25 ft; minimum, 278 ft³/s Nov. 3, gage height 2.85. U.S. Department of the Interior Suggested citation: U.S. Geological Survey, 2012, Water-resources data for the United States, Water U.S. Geological Survey Year 2011: U.S. Geological Survey Water-Data Report WDR-US-2011, site 13190500, accessed at http://wdr.water.usgs.gov/wy2011/pdfs/13190500.2011.pdf Water-Data Report 2011 13190500 SOUTH FORK BOISE RIVER AT ANDERSON RANCH DAM, ID—Continued DISCHARGE, CUBIC FEET PER SECOND WATER YEAR OCTOBER 2010 TO SEPTEMBER 2011 DAILY MEAN VALUES Day Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep 1 301 310 307 307 308 305 572 2,170 3,920 1,930 1,610 598 2 303 304 307 305 306 306 592 2,170 3,920 1,920 1,610 600 3 306 304 307 308 307 305 583 2,170 3,910 1,920 1,610 595 4 308 312 307 314 305 307 619 2,170 3,910 1,900 1,630 592 5 301 312 307 313 303 304 567 2,170 3,910 1,910 1,640 595 6 298 311 307 310 301 306 1,020 2,170 3,950 1,910 1,640 591 7 304 313 307 306 300 306 1,460 2,180 3,950 1,900 1,640 591 8 301 311 307 304 304 306 1,470 2,170 3,740 1,920 1,630 598 9 297 308 313 303 304 306 1,470 2,260 3,470 1,910 1,640 600 10 302 308 311 305 303 306 1,470 2,850 3,470 1,920 1,650 600 11 300 307 311 308 306 309 1,470 2,930 3,470 1,800 1,650 599 12 297 307 311 307 307 307 1,490 3,330 3,450 1,620 1,650 599 13 302 307 311 307 306 304 1,470 3,330 3,200 1,570 1,660 599 14 305 308 304 306 306 303 1,590 3,330 2,750 1,600 1,660 597 15 307 307 307 304 305 301 1,770 3,340 2,210 1,610 1,310 336 16 306 307 306 305 303 305 1,770 3,390 1,900 1,630 1,030 298 17 306 305 300 307 303 304 1,770 3,430 1,910 1,600 843 301 18 303 305 299 306 303 306 1,990 3,430 1,910 1,610 633 302 19 301 304 302 308 303 306 2,170 3,520 1,920 1,600 619 296 20 308 304 304 307 305 303 2,160 3,940 2,190 1,610 618 300 21 301 304 303 304 305 307 2,150 3,950 2,330 1,600 616 302 22 304 305 304 306 307 302 2,130 3,940 1,910 1,600 615 303 23 305 304 309 302 305 303 2,140 3,940 1,930 1,600 616 302 24 309 305 309 303 305 305 2,160 3,940 1,920 1,610 616 300 25 304 306 307 304 305 305 2,170 3,950 1,910 1,610 618 302 26 303 306 309 306 304 306 2,170 3,940 1,910 1,610 607 299 27 301 307 307 306 306 305 2,160 3,940 1,900 1,610 597 300 28 305 307 302 301 307 306 2,160 3,940 1,900 1,610 596 300 29 311 307 301 304 --- 307 2,180 3,940 1,910 1,610 593 299 30 308 307 304 307 --- 307 2,180 3,940 1,930 1,610 598 297 31 308 --- 303 306 --- 307 --- 3,930 --- 1,610 597 --- Total 9,415 9,212 9,493 9,489 8,532 9,465 49,073 99,800 82,610 53,070 34,642 13,191 Mean 304 307 306 306 305 305 1,636 3,219 2,754 1,712 1,117 440 Max 311 313 313 314 308 309 2,180 3,950 3,950 1,930 1,660 600 Min 297 304 299 301 300 301 567 2,170 1,900 1,570 593 296 Ac-ft 18,670 18,270 18,830 18,820 16,920 18,770 97,340 198,000 163,900 105,300 68,710 26,160 STATISTICS OF MONTHLY MEAN DATA FOR WATER YEARS 1943 - 2011, BY WATER YEAR (WY) Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Mean 377 390 487 513 561 639 1,071 2,007 2,251 1,522 1,096 605 Max 1,183 1,504 1,556 1,531 3,002 2,996 3,795 4,820 5,171 2,546 1,865 1,741 (WY) (1953) (1984) (1984) (1984) (1997) (1997) (1946) (1943) (1983) (1950) (2008) (1952) Min 1.46 1.32 1.26 1.30 1.57 3.19 5.84 3.37 572 628 62.6 41.7 (WY) (1949) (1949) (1950) (1949) (1950) (1950) (1962) (1962) (1955) (1944) (1950) (1949) — 2 — Water-Data Report 2011 13190500 SOUTH FORK BOISE RIVER AT ANDERSON RANCH DAM, ID—Continued SUMMARY STATISTICS Calendar Year 2010 Water Year 2011 Water Years 1943 - 2011 Annual total 270,464 387,992 Annual mean 741 1,063 956 Highest annual mean 1,735 1997 Lowest annual mean 411 1992 Highest daily mean 3,120 Jun 16 3,950 May 21 9,770 May 25, 1956 Lowest daily mean 284 Feb 10 296 Sep 19 0.70 Sep 21, 1950 Annual seven-day minimum 287 Feb 6 300 Sep 24 0.76 Sep 18, 1950 Annual runoff (ac-ft) 536,500 769,600 692,800 10 percent exceeds 1,800 2,500 2,030 50 percent exceeds 308 310 597 90 percent exceeds 289 302 205 10,000 5,000 2,000 FEET PER SECOND 1,000 500 MEAN DISCHARGE, CUBIC 200 100 O N D J F M A M J J A S 2010 2011 — 3 — .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Histories: Boise Project” Vol
    The Boise Project Wm. Joe Simonds Bureau of Reclamation History Program Denver, Colorado Originally printed:1997 Reformatted, reedited, and reprinted by Brit Storey: December 2009 Table of Contents Table of Contents..............................................................1 The Boise Project..............................................................2 Project Location.........................................................2 Historic Setting .........................................................3 Project Authorization.....................................................4 Construction History .....................................................4 Boise River Diversion Dam, Deer Flat Embankments, and Main Canal........6 Arrowrock Dam..................................................12 The Payette Division..............................................21 Black Canyon Dam ...............................................22 Deadwood Dam ..................................................27 Anderson Ranch Dam .............................................31 Cascade Dam....................................................38 Post Construction History ................................................40 Settlement of Project Lands ...............................................45 Project Benefits and Uses of Project Water...................................47 Conclusion............................................................49 About the Author .............................................................49 Bibliography ................................................................50
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 18 Southwest Idaho
    Chapter: 18 State(s): Idaho Recovery Unit Name: Southwest Idaho Region 1 U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service Portland, Oregon DISCLAIMER Recovery plans delineate reasonable actions that are believed necessary to recover and/or protect the species. Recovery plans are prepared by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and, in this case, with the assistance of recovery unit teams, State and Tribal agencies, and others. Objectives will be attained and any necessary funds made available subject to budgetary and other constraints affecting the parties involved, as well as the need to address other priorities. Recovery plans do not necessarily represent the views or the official positions or indicate the approval of any individuals or agencies involved in the plan formulation, other than the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Recovery plans represent the official position of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service only after they have been signed by the Director or Regional Director as approved. Approved recovery plans are subject to modification as dictated by new findings, changes in species status, and the completion of recovery tasks. Literature Citation: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2002. Chapter 18, Southwest Idaho Recovery Unit, Idaho. 110 p. In: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Bull Trout (Salvelinus confluentus) Draft Recovery Plan. Portland, Oregon. ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This chapter was developed with the assistance of the Southwest Idaho Bull Trout Recovery Unit Team, which includes: Dale Allen, Idaho Department of Fish and Game Dave Burns, U.S. Forest Service Tim Burton, U.S. Bureau of Land Management (formerly U.S. Forest Service) Chip Corsi, Idaho Department of Fish and Game Bob Danehy, Boise Corporation Jeff Dillon, Idaho Department of Fish and Game Guy Dodson, Shoshone-Paiute Tribes Jim Esch, U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • History of Boise River Reservoir Operations, 1912‐1995
    History of Boise River Reservoir Operations, 1912‐1995 By Jennifer Stevens, Ph.D. June 25, 2015 JENNIFER STEVENS. PH.D. 1 Table of Contents Author Background and Methodology ......................................................................................................... 4 National Archives, Seattle ......................................................................................................................... 5 National Archives, Denver ........................................................................................................................ 6 Federal Record Center, Denver ................................................................................................................. 6 Idaho State Archives, Boise ....................................................................................................................... 6 Boise State University Special Collections, Boise ...................................................................................... 6 Summary ....................................................................................................................................................... 6 The Boise River: 1902‐1953 ........................................................................................................................ 10 Authorization and Construction of Arrowrock Dam ............................................................................... 10 Drought, Floods, and the Authorization of Anderson Ranch Dam ........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • District Focus Water
    Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District By Daren Coon History he Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District In 1905, NMID acquired the right, title, and (NMID) is a water storage, conveyance, interest to a canal company that was the predecessor Tdistribution, and drainage system that supplies of NMID. The acquired water rights date back to irrigation water to 69,000 acres of farms and lawns the 1860s and are some of the oldest in the state of in Canyon and Ada Counties of southwestern Idaho. Idaho. The canal company’s original stockholders and Since its founding at the turn of the last century, investors—the same owners of the railroad companies NMID has delivered water to both small, highly that helped open up the West—were from out East, productive farms and a steadily growing urban mostly the Philadelphia area. But private enterprise environment in Idaho’s Treasure Valley. was not able to make it over the long haul. What NMID operates and maintains more than was needed was a political subdivision or entity that 500 miles of canals and drains to deliver water had the right of assessment and did not have to rely to variety of crops, including sugar beets, alfalfa, on outside investors to underwrite the expense of District Focus beans, and flower seeds, while thousands of miles of construction and maintenance. The formation of pressurized pipe services portions of three cities and NMID brought management home to the water users 367 subdivisions. NMID’s primary responsibility of the Treasure Valley—those making a living off the is simple: to operate and maintain the district’s water.
    [Show full text]
  • Idaho Water Watch Newsletter of the Idaho Water Users Association April 2019
    Idaho Water Watch Newsletter of the Idaho Water Users Association www.iwua.org April 2019 IWUA Completes Successful Legislative Session IWUA has completed another successful Legislative Session! Our Legislative Committee took a position on 18 bills, including: • H1: Part of the refill settlement in the Treasure Valley, this bill provides statutory authority for the Director to subordinate new storage over 1,000 acre-feet to on- stream storage reservoirs; • H285: Provides $20 million for large water infrastructure and $1 million for flood management projects and water quality monitoring; • S1056a: Authorizes the Director to curtail ground water users for failure to comply with mitigation plans; and • S1086: Amends Idaho Code to clarify the right to remove vegetation from irrigation rights of way. Check out www.iwua.org to see the final Legislative Report. We will discuss the legislation further at the IWUA Water Law and Resource Issues Seminar on June 10-11, in Sun Valley, Idaho. Mark Your calendars June 10-11, 2019: IWUA Water Law & Resource Issues Seminar (Sun Valley, ID) August 7-9, 2019: NWRA Western Water Seminar IWUA on social media (Portland, OR) Twitter: @IWUA_H20 November 6-8, 2019: NWRA Annual Conference (Houston, Instagram: @runningwaters83301 TX) Facebook: @IdahoH20 January 20-23, 2020: IWUA 83rd Annual Conference (Boise, ID) Idaho Water users lobby in d.c. In early April, Idaho water users descended on Washington D.C. for the annual NWRA Federal Water Issues Conference. This year’s agenda incorporated discussions about infrastructure and streamlining federal processes. Speakers included Shelby Hagenauer, Deputy Commissioner for the Bureau of Reclamation, the Honorable R.D.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Assessment
    United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service November 2007 Environmental Assessment Travel Plan Map Revision Elimination of Motorized Cross-Country Travel and Motorized Route Designation Sawtooth National Forest Fairfield Ranger District, Camas County, Idaho Ketchum Ranger District, Blaine County, Idaho Minidoka Ranger District, Twin Falls, Cassia, Power, and Oneida Counties, Idaho; Box Elder County, Utah For Information Contact: Kim Pierson—Team Leader Sawtooth National Forest, Supervisor’s Office, Twin Falls, Idaho (208) 737-3200 http://www.fs.fed.us/r4/sawtooth/projects/ The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, gender, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, or marital or family status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, Room 326-W, Whitten Building, 14th and Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20250-9410 or call (202) 720-5964 (voice and TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Environmental Assessment Sawtooth National Forest Route Designation Table of Contents Acronyms, Abbreviations, and Initialisms .........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 Idaho Fire Restrictions Plan
    IDAHO FIRE RESTRICTIONS PLAN 2021 IDAHO FIRE RESTRICTIONS PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION, SIGNATURES, PURPOSE, AND AUTHORITY 1 AREA DETERMINATION 2 PROCESS FOR FIRE RESTRICTIONS 2 INITIATION 2 IMPLEMENTATION 3 RESCISSION 3 PROCESS FOR CLOSURES & INFORMATION SHARING 4 APPENDIX 1: AUTHORITIES 5 APPENDIX 2: ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES 6 APPENDIX 3: AREA BOUNDARIES IN NARRATIVE FORMAT 8 APPENDIX 4: STAGE I AND STAGE II FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS 12 (FAQS) APPENDIX 5: STAGE I AND STAGE II RESTRICTIONS & VOLUNTARY MEASURES FOR IDAHO DEPARTMENT OF LANDS LOGGING OPERATIONS 19 APPENDIX 6: DEFINITIONS 23 APPENDIX 7: AREA FIRE RESTRICTIONS COORDINATORS 24 APPENDIX 8: MAP OF IDAHO FIRE RESTRICTIONS AREAS 25 APPENDIX 9: FIRE RESTRICTIONS AREA PLANS AND MAPS BOISE 26 CENTRAL IDAHO 37 COEUR D’ALENE 40 EASTERN IDAHO 46 GRANGEVILLE 54 PAYETTE 60 SOUTH CENTRAL 69 WILDERNESS 77 APPENDIX 10: NEWS RELEASE, EXEMPTION, AND RESTRCTION ORDER 82 TEMPLETES APPENDIX 11: STAGE II EXEMPTIONS FOR PUBLIC UTILITIES AND RAILROADS 93 APPENDIX 12: FIRE RESTRICTION AREA CRITERIA EVALUATION FORM 99 Introduction The Idaho Fire Restrictions Plan is an interagency document that outlines interagency coordination efforts regarding fire restrictions and closures. An interagency approach for initiating restrictions or closures helps provide consistency among the land management partners, while defining the restriction boundaries so they are easily distinguishable to the public. Each restrictions area is encouraged to recruit any affected agency or landowner into restriction conversations whenever possible. Signatures All agencies signatory to the Idaho Statewide Annual Operating Plan are encumbered into Idaho’s Fire Restriction Plan. A unique signature page for this plan is not necessary.
    [Show full text]
  • History of the Boise National Fo 1905 1976. C
    HISTORY OF THE BOISE NATIONAL FO 1905 1976. C 0 0 0 • A HISTORY OF THE BOISE NATIONAL FOREST 1905-1976 by ELIZABETH M. SMITH IDAHO STATE HISTORICAL SOCIETY BOISE 1983 History of the Boise National Forest, 1905-1976, is published under a co- operative agreement between the Idaho State Historical Society and the Boise National Forest. DEDICATION This history is dedicated to the memory of Guy B. Mains, who served as supervisor of the former Payette National Forest from 1908 to 1920 and 1924 to 1925 and was supervisor of the former Boise National Forest from 1925 to 1940. He spent a total of twenty-eight years in the development of the present Boise National Forest, serving as a supervisor for over one-third of the total history of the forest from its beginning in 1905 to the present. kJ TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgments vii Boise National Forest Data ix PART I: BEFORE THE NATIONAL FOREST Indians 3 Fur Trade, Exploration, and Emigration 7 Mining 11 Chinese 18 Settlement 20 Place Names 25 7. Early Transportation 29 PART II: CREATION, DEVELOPMENT, AND ADMINISTRATION Creation of the Boise National Forest 39 Administering the Forest 44 Civilian Conservation Corps 55 Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station 61 The Lucky Peak Nursery 66 Youth Conservation Corps 68 PART III: RESOURCES AND FUNCTIONS Geology 71 Watershed, Soils, and Minerals 73 Timber Management 82 Range Management 91 Wildlife Management 99 Recreation and Land Use 105 Fire Management 111 Improvements and Engineering 127 Conclusion 135 APPENDICES Supervisors and Headquarters Locations 139 Early Mining Methods and Terms 140 Towns and Mining Camps 143 Changes in Management Through Legislation 148 Dams and Reservoirs 153 Graves in the Boise National Forest 158 BIBLIOGRAPHY 161 Illustrations Map of the Boise National Forest Photographs following page 78 .
    [Show full text]
  • Boise National Forest Native Plant Materials Program — NFN3 Funding Report
    Boise National Forest Native Plant Materials Program — NFN3 Funding Report 2011 Accomplishments Boise National Forest’s Native Plant Materials Program - Providing locally collected native plant materials for site restoration and rehabilitation for the Boise National For- est and its partners. Se This year’s accomplishments and activities include: ed Completion of an annually renewable Native Plant Materials Collecting Cooperative Agreement ($17,000 for 2011) with Idaho Fish and Game (IDFG) for plant materials collection on the Boise NF. NativeNative seed seed harvest harvest and and fields fields at at IDFG volunteers collected 330 pounds of raw seed during the summer of 2011. This included collection from a variety of LuckyLucky Peak Peak Nursery Nursery upland and wetland grasses, sedges and rushes, forbs and berry producing shrubs. Collection sites were located on the The Boise NF currently has 3 acres of locally sourced Mt Home, Lowman and Idaho City Ranger Districts. native grass and forb seed in production at the Lucky Peak Nursery. Harvesting cottonwood cuttings in the South Fork Boise River watershed for the Pierce Creek Culvert project and establish- Cleaning and testing of 2010 seed col- ment of new stooling beds at Lucky Peak Nursery. lection, and ongoing maintenance and storage of the Boise NF native seed Seed phenology checks for the rare Idaho douglasia bank. (Douglasia idahoensis) near Swanholm Lookout. Oversight and coordination of the Tennessee Creek Native plant materials collections, including native seed and native seed program for the Boise NF. willow and cottonwood stock, will be used for restoration ac- tivities on bridge/culvert projects at the Fivemile Bridge, Ten- nessee and Grimes Creeks, Anderson Ranch Dam Borrow FY2010 Carryover: Report number 2 of 3; Expended $26,514 to Lucky Pit and for the FR 582 Peak Nursery; Balance of $1,386.
    [Show full text]
  • Schedule of Proposed Action (SOPA) 04/01/2017 to 06/30/2017 Boise National Forest This Report Contains the Best Available Information at the Time of Publication
    Schedule of Proposed Action (SOPA) 04/01/2017 to 06/30/2017 Boise National Forest This report contains the best available information at the time of publication. Questions may be directed to the Project Contact. Expected Project Name Project Purpose Planning Status Decision Implementation Project Contact R4 - Intermountain Region, Occurring in more than one Forest (excluding Regionwide) Boise & Sawtooth Forest-wide - Wildlife, Fish, Rare plants In Progress: Expected:07/2017 07/2017 Michael Haney Invasive Plant Species - Vegetation management DEIS NOA in Federal Register 208-737-3200 Treatments (other than forest products) 09/30/2016 comments-intermtn- EIS - Watershed management Est. FEIS NOA in Federal [email protected] *UPDATED* Register 06/2017 Description: Analyze and disclose the effects of treating invasive and noxious weeds forest-wide on the Boise & Sawtooth National Forests. Web Link: http://www.fs.usda.gov/project/?project=47151 Location: UNIT - Boise National Forest All Units, Sawtooth National Forest All Units. STATE - Idaho, Utah. COUNTY - Ada, Blaine, Boise, Camas, Cassia, Custer, Elmore, Gem, Oneida, Power, Twin Falls, Valley, Box Elder. LEGAL - Not Applicable. Sawtooth and Boise National Forests. Boise National Forest, Occurring in more than one District (excluding Forestwide) R4 - Intermountain Region Idaho Power Company - - Special use management In Progress: Expected:11/2017 12/2017 Terre PearsonRamirez Horseshoe Bend to Garden Scoping Start 01/04/2017 530-257-4188 Valley Project Est. Comment Period Public [email protected] EA Notice 05/2017 *UPDATED* Description: Reissuance of a SUP. Authorizes repair, maintenance, and upgrade of 34 kV distribution lines from Horseshoe Bend to Placerville and Placerville to Garden Valley.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 65, No. 208/Thursday, October 26, 2000
    64234 Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 208 / Thursday, October 26, 2000 / Notices DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR address from public disclosure, which considered in the development of we will honor to the extent allowable by alternatives. Bureau of Reclamation law. There also may be circumstances in The Draft EIS is limited to the which we would withhold a potential effects of replacing the lower Arrowrock Dam Outlet Works respondent's identity from public row of Ensign valves with clamshell Rehabilitation, INT±DES 00±45 disclosure, as allowable by law. If you gates. Reclamation has deferred AGENCY: Bureau of Reclamation, wish us to withhold your name and/or maintenance and replacement activities Interior. address, you must state this on the lower Ensign valves since 1988 ACTION: Notice of availability of Draft prominently at the beginning of your so that action alternatives could be Environmental Impact Statement and comment. We will make all submissions identified and compared to a No Action notice of public hearings. from organizations or businesses, and alternative consisting of an aggressive from individuals identifying themselves maintenance program. Environmental SUMMARY: Pursuant to section 102(2)(C) as representatives or officials of effects of the action and No Action of the National Environmental Policy organizations or businesses, available alternatives were analyzed for the Act of 1969, as amended, the for public disclosure in their entirety. stream reaches and reservoirs upstream Department of the Interior, Bureau of FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. and downstream from Arrowrock Dam Reclamation (Reclamation) has prepared John Tiedeman, (208) 378±5034. and Reservoir. Potential environmental a draft environmental impact statement SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Arrowrock effects are generally limited to those (Draft EIS) to examine the impacts of Dam and Reservoir, completed in 1915, associated with construction and the alternatives to rehabilitate the outlet were constructed by the Bureau of reservoir drawdowns necessary for works at Arrowrock Dam.
    [Show full text]
  • Schedule of Proposed Action (SOPA) 04/01/2019 to 06/30/2019 Boise National Forest This Report Contains the Best Available Information at the Time of Publication
    Schedule of Proposed Action (SOPA) 04/01/2019 to 06/30/2019 Boise National Forest This report contains the best available information at the time of publication. Questions may be directed to the Project Contact. Expected Project Name Project Purpose Planning Status Decision Implementation Project Contact Projects Occurring in more than one Region (excluding Nationwide) Amendments to Land - Land management planning In Progress: Expected:01/2019 02/2019 John Shivik Management Plans Regarding - Wildlife, Fish, Rare plants NOI in Federal Register 801-625-5667 Sage-grouse Conservation 11/21/2017 [email protected] EIS Est. DEIS NOA in Federal Register 06/2018 Description: The Forest Service is considering amending its land management plans to address new and evolving issues arising since implementing sage-grouse plans in 2015. This project is in cooperation with the USDI Bureau of Land Management. Web Link: https://www.fs.usda.gov/detail/r4/home/?cid=stelprd3843381 Location: UNIT - Ashley National Forest All Units, Boise National Forest All Units, Bridger-Teton National Forest All Units, Beaverhead-Deerlodge National Forest All Units, Medicine Bow-Routt National Forest All Units, Dixie National Forest All Units, Fishlake National Forest All Units, Salmon-Challis National Forest All Units, Sawtooth National Forest All Units, Humboldt-Toiyabe National Forest All Units, Manti-La Sal National Forest All Units, Caribou- Targhee National Forest All Units, Uinta-Wasatch-Cache All Units. STATE - Colorado, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, Utah, Wyoming.
    [Show full text]