Reproductive Biology of the Endemic Toad Xanthophryne
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Catalogue of the Amphibians of Venezuela: Illustrated and Annotated Species List, Distribution, and Conservation 1,2César L
Mannophryne vulcano, Male carrying tadpoles. El Ávila (Parque Nacional Guairarepano), Distrito Federal. Photo: Jose Vieira. We want to dedicate this work to some outstanding individuals who encouraged us, directly or indirectly, and are no longer with us. They were colleagues and close friends, and their friendship will remain for years to come. César Molina Rodríguez (1960–2015) Erik Arrieta Márquez (1978–2008) Jose Ayarzagüena Sanz (1952–2011) Saúl Gutiérrez Eljuri (1960–2012) Juan Rivero (1923–2014) Luis Scott (1948–2011) Marco Natera Mumaw (1972–2010) Official journal website: Amphibian & Reptile Conservation amphibian-reptile-conservation.org 13(1) [Special Section]: 1–198 (e180). Catalogue of the amphibians of Venezuela: Illustrated and annotated species list, distribution, and conservation 1,2César L. Barrio-Amorós, 3,4Fernando J. M. Rojas-Runjaic, and 5J. Celsa Señaris 1Fundación AndígenA, Apartado Postal 210, Mérida, VENEZUELA 2Current address: Doc Frog Expeditions, Uvita de Osa, COSTA RICA 3Fundación La Salle de Ciencias Naturales, Museo de Historia Natural La Salle, Apartado Postal 1930, Caracas 1010-A, VENEZUELA 4Current address: Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Río Grande do Sul (PUCRS), Laboratório de Sistemática de Vertebrados, Av. Ipiranga 6681, Porto Alegre, RS 90619–900, BRAZIL 5Instituto Venezolano de Investigaciones Científicas, Altos de Pipe, apartado 20632, Caracas 1020, VENEZUELA Abstract.—Presented is an annotated checklist of the amphibians of Venezuela, current as of December 2018. The last comprehensive list (Barrio-Amorós 2009c) included a total of 333 species, while the current catalogue lists 387 species (370 anurans, 10 caecilians, and seven salamanders), including 28 species not yet described or properly identified. Fifty species and four genera are added to the previous list, 25 species are deleted, and 47 experienced nomenclatural changes. -
Anura: Hemiphractidae: Gastrotheca)
Accepted Manuscript Short communication Brazilian marsupial frogs are diphyletic (Anura: Hemiphractidae: Gastrotheca) David C. Blackburn, William E. Duellman PII: S1055-7903(13)00179-6 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2013.04.021 Reference: YMPEV 4580 To appear in: Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution Received Date: 7 January 2013 Revised Date: 2 April 2013 Accepted Date: 22 April 2013 Please cite this article as: Blackburn, D.C., Duellman, W.E., Brazilian marsupial frogs are diphyletic (Anura: Hemiphractidae: Gastrotheca), Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution (2013), doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ j.ympev.2013.04.021 This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain. 1 Short Communication 2 3 Brazilian marsupial frogs are diphyletic (Anura: Hemiphractidae: Gastrotheca) 4 5 David C. Blackburna,*, William E. Duellmanb 6 a Department of Vertebrate Zoology & Anthropology, California Academy of Sciences, 55 7 Music Concourse Drive, San Francisco, CA 94118, USA 8 b Biodiversity Institute, University of Kansas, 1345 Jayhawk Boulevard, Lawrence, KS 9 66045, USA 10 * Corresponding author. E-mail address: [email protected] (D.C. Blackburn) 11 12 Abstract 13 Molecular phylogenetic analyses based on expanded taxonomic and geographic sampling 14 support the monophyly of the marsupial frog genera (family Hemiphractidae), resolve six 15 geographically circumscribed lineages within Gastrotheca, and, for the first time, reveal 16 that two divergent lineages of Gastrotheca inhabit the Atlantic Coastal Forests of Brazil. -
Antipredator Mechanisms of Post-Metamorphic Anurans: a Global Database and Classification System
Utah State University DigitalCommons@USU Ecology Center Publications Ecology Center 5-1-2019 Antipredator Mechanisms of Post-Metamorphic Anurans: A Global Database and Classification System Rodrigo B. Ferreira Utah State University Ricardo Lourenço-de-Moraes Universidade Estadual de Maringá Cássio Zocca Universidade Vila Velha Charles Duca Universidade Vila Velha Karen H. Beard Utah State University Edmund D. Brodie Jr. Utah State University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/eco_pubs Part of the Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Commons Recommended Citation Ferreira, R.B., Lourenço-de-Moraes, R., Zocca, C. et al. Behav Ecol Sociobiol (2019) 73: 69. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s00265-019-2680-1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Ecology Center at DigitalCommons@USU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Ecology Center Publications by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@USU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 1 Antipredator mechanisms of post-metamorphic anurans: a global database and 2 classification system 3 4 Rodrigo B. Ferreira1,2*, Ricardo Lourenço-de-Moraes3, Cássio Zocca1, Charles Duca1, Karen H. 5 Beard2, Edmund D. Brodie Jr.4 6 7 1 Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ecologia de Ecossistemas, Universidade Vila Velha, Vila Velha, ES, 8 Brazil 9 2 Department of Wildland Resources and the Ecology Center, Utah State University, Logan, UT, United 10 States of America 11 3 Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ecologia de Ambientes Aquáticos Continentais, Universidade Estadual 12 de Maringá, Maringá, PR, Brazil 13 4 Department of Biology and the Ecology Center, Utah State University, Logan, UT, United States of 14 America 15 16 *Corresponding author: Rodrigo B. -
Abstract Book JMIH 2011
Abstract Book JMIH 2011 Abstracts for the 2011 Joint Meeting of Ichthyologists & Herpetologists AES – American Elasmobranch Society ASIH - American Society of Ichthyologists & Herpetologists HL – Herpetologists’ League NIA – Neotropical Ichthyological Association SSAR – Society for the Study of Amphibians & Reptiles Minneapolis, Minnesota 6-11 July 2011 Edited by Martha L. Crump & Maureen A. Donnelly 0165 Fish Biogeography & Phylogeography, Symphony III, Saturday 9 July 2011 Amanda Ackiss1, Shinta Pardede2, Eric Crandall3, Paul Barber4, Kent Carpenter1 1Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA, USA, 2Wildlife Conservation Society, Jakarta, Java, Indonesia, 3Fisheries Ecology Division; Southwest Fisheries Science Center, Santa Cruz, CA, USA, 4University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA Corroborated Phylogeographic Breaks Across the Coral Triangle: Population Structure in the Redbelly Fusilier, Caesio cuning The redbelly yellowtail fusilier, Caesio cuning, has a tropical Indo-West Pacific range that straddles the Coral Triangle, a region of dynamic geological history and the highest marine biodiversity on the planet. Caesio cuning is a reef-associated artisanal fishery, making it an ideal species for assessing regional patterns of gene flow for evidence of speciation mechanisms as well as for regional management purposes. We evaluated the genetic population structure of Caesio cuning using a 382bp segment of the mitochondrial control region amplified from over 620 fish sampled from 33 localities across the Philippines and Indonesia. Phylogeographic -
3Systematics and Diversity of Extant Amphibians
Systematics and Diversity of 3 Extant Amphibians he three extant lissamphibian lineages (hereafter amples of classic systematics papers. We present widely referred to by the more common term amphibians) used common names of groups in addition to scientifi c Tare descendants of a common ancestor that lived names, noting also that herpetologists colloquially refer during (or soon after) the Late Carboniferous. Since the to most clades by their scientifi c name (e.g., ranids, am- three lineages diverged, each has evolved unique fea- bystomatids, typhlonectids). tures that defi ne the group; however, salamanders, frogs, A total of 7,303 species of amphibians are recognized and caecelians also share many traits that are evidence and new species—primarily tropical frogs and salaman- of their common ancestry. Two of the most defi nitive of ders—continue to be described. Frogs are far more di- these traits are: verse than salamanders and caecelians combined; more than 6,400 (~88%) of extant amphibian species are frogs, 1. Nearly all amphibians have complex life histories. almost 25% of which have been described in the past Most species undergo metamorphosis from an 15 years. Salamanders comprise more than 660 species, aquatic larva to a terrestrial adult, and even spe- and there are 200 species of caecilians. Amphibian diver- cies that lay terrestrial eggs require moist nest sity is not evenly distributed within families. For example, sites to prevent desiccation. Thus, regardless of more than 65% of extant salamanders are in the family the habitat of the adult, all species of amphibians Plethodontidae, and more than 50% of all frogs are in just are fundamentally tied to water. -
Salve-Exportacao-13-7-2018-104847
Anfíbios: 3ª Oficina de Avaliação CENTRO NACIONAL DE PESQUISA E CONSERVAÇÃO DE RÉPTEIS E ANFÍBIOS - RAN # Família Nome Científico 1 Eleutherodactylidae Adelophryne baturitensis 2 Eleutherodactylidae Adelophryne maranguapensis 3 Eleutherodactylidae Adelophryne mucronatus 4 Eleutherodactylidae Adelophryne pachydactyla 5 Leptodactylidae Adenomera araucaria 6 Leptodactylidae Adenomera engelsi 7 Leptodactylidae Adenomera marmorata 8 Leptodactylidae Adenomera nana 9 Leptodactylidae Adenomera thomei 10 Aromobatidae Allobates alagoanus 11 Aromobatidae Allobates tinae 12 Aromobatidae Allobates trilineatus 13 Allophrynidae Allophryne relicta 14 Bufonidae Amazophrynella moisesii 15 Bufonidae Amazophrynella teko 16 Bufonidae Amazophrynella xinguensis 17 Hylidae Aparasphenodon arapapa 18 Hylidae Aparasphenodon brunoi 19 Hylidae Aplastodiscus cochranae 20 Hylidae Aplastodiscus ehrhardti 21 Hylidae Aplastodiscus ibirapitanga 22 Hylidae Aplastodiscus sibilatus 23 Hylidae Boana albomarginata 24 Hylidae Boana alfaroi 25 Hylidae Boana atlantica 26 Hylidae Boana bischoffi 27 Hylidae Boana caingua 28 Hylidae Boana curupi 29 Hylidae Boana exastis 30 Hylidae Boana faber 31 Hylidae Boana freicanecae 32 Hylidae Boana guentheri 33 Hylidae Boana joaquini 34 Hylidae Boana leptolineata 35 Hylidae Boana marginata 36 Hylidae Boana poaju 37 Hylidae Boana pombali 38 Hylidae Boana pulchella 39 Hylidae Boana semiguttata 40 Hylidae Boana semilineata 41 Hylidae Boana stellae 42 Hylidae Bokermannohyla alvarengai 43 Hylidae Bokermannohyla capra 44 Hylidae Bokermannohyla circumdata -
Standard Guidelines for the Captive Keeping of Anurans
Standard Guidelines for the Captive Keeping of Anurans Developed by the Workgroup Anurans of the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Herpetologie und Terrarienkunde (DGHT) e. V. Informations about the booklet The amphibian table benefi ted from the participation of the following specialists: Dr. Beat Akeret: Zoologist, Ecologist and Scientist in Nature Conserva- tion; President of the DGHT Regional Group Switzerland and the DGHT City Group Zurich Dr. Samuel Furrer: Zoologist; Curator of Amphibians and Reptiles of the Zurich Zoological Gardens (until 2017) Prof. Dr. Stefan Lötters: Zoologist; Docent at the University of Trier for Herpeto- logy, specialising in amphibians; Member of the Board of the DGHT Workgroup Anurans Dr. Peter Janzen: Zoologist, specialising in amphibians; Chairman and Coordinator of the Conservation Breeding Project “Amphibian Ark” Detlef Papenfuß, Ulrich Schmidt, Ralf Schmitt, Stefan Ziesmann, Frank Malz- korn: Members of the Board of the DGHT Workgroup Anurans Dr. Axel Kwet: Zoologist, amphibian specialist; Management and Editorial Board of the DGHT Bianca Opitz: Layout and Typesetting Thomas Ulber: Translation, Herprint International A wide range of other specialists provided important additional information and details that have been Oophaga pumilio incorporated in the amphibian table. Poison Dart Frog page 2 Foreword Dear Reader, keeping anurans in an expertly manner means taking an interest in one of the most fascinating groups of animals that, at the same time, is a symbol of the current threats to global biodiversity and an indicator of progressing climate change. The contribution that private terrarium keeping is able to make to researching the biology of anurans is evident from the countless publications that have been the result of individuals dedicating themselves to this most attractive sector of herpetology. -
1704632114.Full.Pdf
Phylogenomics reveals rapid, simultaneous PNAS PLUS diversification of three major clades of Gondwanan frogs at the Cretaceous–Paleogene boundary Yan-Jie Fenga, David C. Blackburnb, Dan Lianga, David M. Hillisc, David B. Waked,1, David C. Cannatellac,1, and Peng Zhanga,1 aState Key Laboratory of Biocontrol, College of Ecology and Evolution, School of Life Sciences, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou 510006, China; bDepartment of Natural History, Florida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611; cDepartment of Integrative Biology and Biodiversity Collections, University of Texas, Austin, TX 78712; and dMuseum of Vertebrate Zoology and Department of Integrative Biology, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720 Contributed by David B. Wake, June 2, 2017 (sent for review March 22, 2017; reviewed by S. Blair Hedges and Jonathan B. Losos) Frogs (Anura) are one of the most diverse groups of vertebrates The poor resolution for many nodes in anuran phylogeny is and comprise nearly 90% of living amphibian species. Their world- likely a result of the small number of molecular markers tra- wide distribution and diverse biology make them well-suited for ditionally used for these analyses. Previous large-scale studies assessing fundamental questions in evolution, ecology, and conser- used 6 genes (∼4,700 nt) (4), 5 genes (∼3,800 nt) (5), 12 genes vation. However, despite their scientific importance, the evolutionary (6) with ∼12,000 nt of GenBank data (but with ∼80% missing history and tempo of frog diversification remain poorly understood. data), and whole mitochondrial genomes (∼11,000 nt) (7). In By using a molecular dataset of unprecedented size, including 88-kb the larger datasets (e.g., ref. -
Rediscovery of Gastrotheca Chrysostictalaurent
Nota Cuad. herpetol. 32(2): 00-00 (2018) Rediscovery of Gastrotheca chrysosticta Laurent, 1976 (Anura: Hemiphractidae) in Baritú National Park, Salta, Argentina Mauricio S. Akmentins1, Martín Boullhesen1,2, Sofía Bardavid1, Clemente J. Espinoza, Fernando Falke3 1 Instituto de Ecorregiones Andinas (INECOA), Universidad Nacional de Jujuy – CONICET. San Salvador de Jujuy, Jujuy, Argentina. 2 Programa de Investigaciones de Biodiversidad Argentina (PIDBA) – Facultad de Ciencias Naturales e Instituto Miguel Lillo. San Miguel de Tucumán, Tucumán, Argentina. 3 Parque Nacional Baritú – Administración de Parques Nacionales. Los Toldos, Salta, Argentina. Recibida: 09 Agosto 2018 ABSTRACT Revisada: 18 Agosto 2018 We report the rediscovery of the Marsupial Frog Gastrotheca chrysosticta, 25 years after the last Aceptada: 19 Septiembre 2018 record of this species in Baritú National Park, Salta Province, Argentina. Editor Asociado: D. Baldo Key Words: Marsupial Frog; Yungas Andean Forests; Threatened Species doi: 10.31017/CdH.2018.(2018-021) Gastrotheca chrysosticta Laurent, 1976, is one of was continuous until 04:00 hrs of the following day. three endemic species of marsupial frogs that inhabit We collected one voucher specimen housed the Yungas Andean forests of northwestern Argenti- in the Herpetological Collection of Fundación na (Akmentins et al., 2012). This species was known Miguel Lillo, Tucumán, Argentina (FML 30266). only from a few localities in this country, with a We assigned it to G. chrysosticta based on external disjunct distribution in northern and southern areas morphological characters, particularly the dorsal of the Salta Province (Laurent et al., 1986). The last coloration pattern that refers to its specific epithet record of this species was a male specimen collected “golden spotted” due to the presence of yellowish in Baritú National Park in 1993 and deposited in the spots irregularly distributed over the head, back Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales as MACN and legs (Fig. -
Early Development of the Glass Frogs Hyalinobatrachium Fleischmanni and Espadarana Callistomma (Anura: Centrolenidae) from Cleavage to Tadpole Hatching
Official journal website: Amphibian & Reptile Conservation amphibian-reptile-conservation.org 8(1) [Special Section]: 89–106 (e88). Early development of the glass frogs Hyalinobatrachium fleischmanni and Espadarana callistomma (Anura: Centrolenidae) from cleavage to tadpole hatching María-José Salazar-Nicholls and Eugenia M. del Pino* Escuela de Ciencias Biológicas, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador, Av. 12 de Octubre 1076 y Roca, Quito 170517, ECUADOR Abstract.—We report the characteristics of embryonic development from cleavage to tadpole hatching in two species of glass frogs, Hyalinobatrachium fleischmanni and Espadarana callistomma (Anura: Centrolenidae). This analysis of embryonic development in centrolenid frogs enhances comparative studies of frog early development and contributes baseline information for the conservation and management of Ecuadorian frogs. These frogs reproduced in captivity and their embryos were fixed for developmental analysis. The morphology of embryos was evaluated in whole mounts, bisections, thick sections, and fluorescent staining of cell nuclei. Egg clutches contained an average of 23 and 35 eggs for H. fleischmanni and E. callistomma, respectively. The eggs of both frogs measured approximately 2.1 mm in diameter. The eggs of H. fleischmanni were uniformly pale green. In contrast, the animal hemisphere of E. callistomma eggs was dark brown and the vegetal hemisphere was light brown. The developmental time of H. fleischmanni and E. callistomma under laboratory conditions was 6 and 12 days, respectively from the 32–cell stage until tadpole hatching. Differences in environmental conditions may be associated with the time differences of early development observed in these frogs. The development of glass frogs from egg deposition to tadpole hatching was staged into 25 standard stages according to the generalized table of frog development. -
A Taxonomic Review of the Genus Hemiphractus (Anura
Zootaxa 4429 (3): 495–512 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) http://www.mapress.com/j/zt/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2018 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4429.3.3 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:75A5698E-758E-473A-AE16-5118880AA412 A taxonomic review of the genus Hemiphractus (Anura: Hemiphractidae) in Panama: Description of Two New Species, Resurrection of Hemiphractus panamensis (Stejneger, 1917), and Discussion of Hemiphractus fasciatus Peters, 1862 ROBERT L. HILL1, KATHRYN G. MARTIN2, EDWARD STANLEY3 & JOSEPH R. MENDELSON III1,2 1Zoo Atlanta, 800 Cherokee Ave SE, Atlanta, GA 30315, USA. E-mail: [email protected]; [email protected] 2School of Biological Sciences, 950 Atlantic Dr., Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332, USA. E-mail: [email protected] 3Florida Museum of Natural History, 1659 Museum Rd., University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract We reviewed the taxonomic status of populations of frogs in the genus Hemiphractus in Panama, which have all been re- ferred to Hemiphractus fasciatus Peters, 1862 for over 40 years. Although relatively few specimens have been collected, mostly juveniles, it is clear that these frogs inhabit three separate upland regions of the country: The Cordillera de Tala- manca in western Panama, the Chagres Highlands and Cordillera de San Blas in central Panama, and the Serranía de Pirre in the far eastern portion of the country. In accordance with previously published molecular data, we identified distinctive features of the skulls of frogs representing these three allopatric populations and herein revalidate H. -
Amphibians of the Pantanal
AMPHIBIANS OF THE PANTANAL Thursday, May 28, 2015 order ANURA Frogs & Toads Leptodactylus chaquensis - Chaco Frog Thursday, May 28, 2015 ANURAN FAMILIES • family AMPHIGNATHODONTIDAE - Marsupial Frogs - (? species) • family AROMABATIDAE - (95 species) • family BUFONIDAE - True Toads - (528 species) • family CENTROLENIDAE - Glass Frogs - (148 species) • family CERATOPHRYNIDAE - Horned Frogs - (85 species) • family DENDROBATIDAE - Poison-Dart Frogs - (169 species) • family HEMIPHRACTIDAE - Egg-brooding Treefrogs - (92 species) • family HYLIDAE - New World Treefrogs - (869 species) • family LEIUPERIDAE - (79 species) • family LEPTODACTYLIDAE - Neotropical Frogs - (? species) • family MICROHYLIDAE - Sheep Frogs or Narrow-mouthed Toads - (436 species) • family PIPIDAE - Suriname Toads - (32 species) • family PSEUDIDAE - Paradox Frogs - (4 species) • family RANIDAE - True Frogs - (338 species) • family STRABOMANTIDAE - (? species) Thursday, May 28, 2015 red = have photos 01-ANURA • 01-Bufonidae o Rhinella granulosa o Rhinella schneideri • 02-Hylidae o Dendropsophus elianeae o Dendropsophus melanargyreus o Dendropsophus nanus o Hypsiboas geographicus o Hypsiboas punctatus o Hypsiboas raniceps o Phyllomedusa azurea o Pseudis limellum o Pseudis paradoxa o Scinax acuminatus - Warty-snouted Tree-Frog o Scinax fuscovarius o Scinax nasicus o Scinax sp. o Trachycephalus (=Phrynohyas) venulosus • 03-Leiuperidae o Physalaemus albonotatus o Pleurodema fuscomaculata o Pseudopaludicola aff. mystacalis o Pseudopaludicola sp. • 04-Leptodactylidae o Leptodactylus