Anale. Seria Informatică. Vol. XVIII fasc. 2 – 2020 Annals. Computer Science Series. 18th Tome 2nd Fasc. – 2020 COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT TESTS FOR DETECTING HETEROSCEDASTICITY IN DATASETS Obabire Akinleye A.1, Agboola, Julius O.1, Ajao Isaac O.1 and Adegbilero-Iwari Oluwaseun E.2 1 Department of Mathematics & Statistics, The Federal Polytechnic, Ado-Ekiti, Nigeria 2 Department of Community Medicine, Afe Babalola University, Ado-Ekiti, Nigeria Corresponding author:
[email protected],
[email protected], 3
[email protected],
[email protected] ABSTRACT: Heteroscedasticity occurs mostly because naturally decreases. Also, as income grows, one has of beneath mistakes in variable, incorrect data choices on how to dispose the income, consequently, transformation, incorrect functional form, omission of 휎2 is more likely to increase with the income. Also, important variables, non-detailed model, outliers and a company with a large profit will give more skewness in the distribution of one or more independent dividends to their shareholders than a company that variables in the model. All analysis were carried out in R statistical package using Imtest, zoo and package.base. was newly established. In a situation where data 2 Five heteroscedasticity tests were selected, which are collecting technique improves, 휎푖 is more likely to Park test, Glejser test, Breusch-Pagan test, White test and decrease. In the same sense, banks with good Goldfeld test, and used on simulated datasets ranging equipment for processing data are less prone to from 20,30,40,50,60,70,80,90 and 100 sample sizes make error when processing the monthly statement respectively at different level of heteroscedasticity (that is of account of their customers than banks that does at low level when sigma = 0.5, mild level when sigma = not have good facilities.