The Howey Political Report Is Published by Newslink - Indianapolis Councilor Beulah Coughenour Inc

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Howey Political Report Is Published by Newslink - Indianapolis Councilor Beulah Coughenour Inc Thursday, Feb. 8, 2001 ! Volume 7, Number 25 Page 1 of 8 Leadership crucible The has lingering doubts Howey !"#$%&'%#()$%&'*+,'-.'/+0./('1+()22223 “Doing nothing may be the safest path; it certainly is the easiest path. Doing nothing will cost us nothing monetar- Political ily speaking, but for our community, doing nothing is a path that will lead us to nowhere.” - Columbus Mayor Fred Armstrong “All the mayors are wimps. I guess I wonder why you Report run for an office if you’re scared to do what needs to be done when you get there.” The Howey Political Report is published by NewsLink - Indianapolis Councilor Beulah Coughenour Inc. Founded in 1994, The Howey Political Report is * * * an independent, non-partisan newsletter analyzing the By BRIAN A. HOWEY in Indianapolis political process in Indiana. This state, at a variety of levels, is bearing witness to Brian A. Howey, publisher what could be called the “Leadership Crucible,” or the lack Mark Schoeff Jr., Washington writer thereof. The playing fields of leadership are established at the Jack E. Howey, editor U.S. Capitol in Washington, where Hoosiers are watching The Howey Political Report Office: 317-254-1533 U.S. Sen. Evan Bayh stake out a course that could make him PO Box 40265 Fax: 317-466-0993 conciliator on President Bush’s ambitious tax cut proposal, Indianapolis, IN 46240-0265 Mobile: 317-506-0883 or a candidate for the White House himself. [email protected] There’s the Statehouse, where there seems to be an www.howeypolitics.com almost complete leadership void, with the slippery football Washington office: 202-775-3242; of revenue and tax structure akin to a punt landing among Business Office: 317-254-0535. three cautious players - Gov. Frank O’Bannon, Ways and Subscriptions: $250 annually via e-mail or Means Chairman B. Patrick Bauer, and Senate Finance Chair fax. Call 317-254-1533. Larry Borst - none of them wanting to get their uniforms soiled. © 2001, The Howey Political Report. All rights And it’s playing out in a variety of city halls, where reserved. Photocopying, Internet forwarding, faxing or reproducing in any form, in whole or in part, is a viola- the mayoral class of ‘99 is now confronted with an array of tion of federal law and is strictly prohibited without tough decisions once fought out in Washington now set consent of the publisher. Continued on page 2 “I’d like to know if there was a quid pro quo. Ticker: Bayh, Lugar on Ashcroft p. 2 Maybe there wasn’t. I’d like to find out...” Bob Lang: W. and the Democrats p. 2 Bayh Watch: Taking helm of DLC p. 4 - U.S. Rep. Dan Burton, to CNN on Steve Goldsmith & Dick Cheney p. 6 Wednesday on his coming investigation of Perhaps: Curt Kovener speaks p. 7 President Clinton’s pardon of Marc Rich Columnists: Colwell, Smith, Jones p. 8 Thursday, Feb. 8, 2001 Page 2 of 8 SEN. RICHARD LUGAR’S STATEMENT ON ASHCROFT: "John Ashcroft has the experience and qualifications to serve as attorney general. His career has included being Missouri attorney general, governor and U.S. senator. Democrats and Republicans have emphasized that they believe Sen. Ashcroft is honest, capable and a dedi- cated public official. He has stated unequivocally that as attorney general he would State, he said, ‘We have managed the enforce the law of the land. I Leadership, from page 1 state’s finances well.’ After our analysis, am confident that he under- we’ve decided the state is broke.” stands the centrality of the tling down on Main Street. Mayor Meeting with a dozen reporters on rule of law and the impor- Armstrong of Columbus, speaking in his tance of his conduct as annual state of the city address, was in the Jan. 26, Kiely said that the state can attorney general to all opening stages of coaxing his city council expect $9.447 billion in revenues with a Americans." into improving the city’s senior center. 2000-01 budget of $10.143 billion, creat- Councilor Coughenour’s quote at ing a $696 million shortfall. “We are no SEN. EVAN BAYH’S STATE- the top of this story was her reaction in longer a state of progress, we are a state MENT ON ASHCROFT: "I the Indianapolis Star to Mayor Bart of denial,” Kiely said. “This is not for a rise as someone who Peterson refusing to endorse an annual lack of understanding, we’re just not get- deplores the gridlock of $35 user fee to pay for storm sewer ting the full picture.” recent years and the politics of personal destruction, and updates. Kiely said that Medicaid is “eating yearns for a return to bipar- up half the growth and that’s in a low tisanship and principled State of Denial unemployment environment.” He said that compromise for the sake of Nowhere is the lack of leadership, caseworkers “don’t have a chance, they’re the United States of not too long ago a distant echo from the just shuffling paperwork and nobody’s America. Because of all of David McIntosh for governor campaign, watching. The feds are going to have to these things and all we can come in and whack it.” Kiely added, “The accomplish together, I also more vividly revealing than at the rise to express my opposi- Statehouse. reality is the economy is not going to take tion to the President's nomi- It was ignited by Pat Kiely, the for- care of our policy problems,” suggesting nation of John Ashcroft to mer Ways and Means Chairman who is that the only way out of the mess will be a be the next Attorney now president of the Indiana Manufact- tax increase. General. He will bring some urers Association. Saying that “Indiana Kiely said that options include the of his more strident views looks more like a dot.com than a govern- “gum and bandaids” approach of patching to bear in that office in ways ment,” Kiely warned that the state could things up, or forging ahead with a major that will cause great con- be facing a major financial crisis. “I was restructuring of the state’s tax code. “The frontation and controversy for this President and the amazed at the last forecast when there was governor gets one shot in eight years,” no surplus statement. That was unusual. Kiely said. “This is it. It will require more Continued on page 3 Then during the governor’s State of the fortitude than analysis.” Page 3 of 8 Thursday, Feb. 8, 2001 A week later, the Indianapolis Star ture that Michigan Gov. John Engler did a reported that an “unlikely coaltion of busi- half decade ago. ness and labor leaders” was talking with Kiely makes a compelling case that the O’Bannon administration about tax since Michigan restructured, it now main- restructuring. tains a competitive advantage over But between Kiely’s pronounce- Indiana. The IMA noted 140,000 Indiana ment last Friday that the “governor gets employers contributed $1.4 billion in per- people of this country. As one shot” and any plan would have to sonal property taxes (1998 payable in attorney general he will “come from his lips,” the Democrats 1999), compared to 250,000 Michigan have to enforce the law. But were hardly stepping up to the plate. The employers paying $1.1 billion. Personal what does he consider the Star reported O’Bannon as saying, “I property tax dependence in Michigan law to be? Law is not carved in stone or immune think I’ve got to see that the legislature accounts for 12.7 percent of all property to dispute. In the Justice will really come up with a plan that’s taxes, compared to 30.79 percent in Department, hundreds of bipartisan. There’s always that chance.” Indiana. decisions will be made Bauer told The Star, “Neither party Meanwhile, there are fears that every day, about which has the will do do it.” The Associated Indiana-based companies such as there are varying interpreta- Press reported Bauer as saying, “I think American Trans Air are looking at pulling tions of the law. It will be they have come to the table too late with out, with ATA reportedly looking at mov- Mr. Ashcroft's law that will any proposal that increases any taxes.” ing its headquarters to Chicago. be put into effect for the American people." Borst told the Associated Press that it was “too early to hit the panic button” Playing the end-game GILROY SEEKS D.C. FUND- and added, “The problem around here is Kiely says the talks between the ING FOR ELECTION eventually we get to the point where we unholy business/labor alliance “are on- REFORM: Secretary of State equate good education with the amount of going. People are still trying to sort out Sue Anne Gilroy was in money we spend.” the base issues.” Washington this week exploring federal support Meanwhile, the most compelling for election reform in Governor’s will parlor game in Indiana is whether Indiana. Gilroy wants In the past, any restructuring or rev- O’Bannon will use his mandate. Washington to help pay part enue increases always came from the gov- O’Bannon has a propensity for playing the of the estimated $30 million ernor. Doc Bowen campaigned on his tax end-game in any given legislative session. it will take to upgrade punch plan throughout 1972 and used his victory That worked when he tied Colt and Pacer card and lever voting to push the plan through the following stadium plans to workers compensation machines through which year.
Recommended publications
  • Learning from the Leaders Welfare Reform in the Midwestern States
    Chapter 1 LEARNING FROM MIDWESTERN LEADERS Carol S. Weissert Few, if any, intergovernmental programs in recent memory have received the academic, political, and public attention of the 1996 federal Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconcilia- tion Act (PRWORA), which abolished Aid to Families with Depend- ent Children (AFDC) and replaced it with Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF). The 1996 legislation, which converted wel- fare from an entitlement program administered by the states to block grants that states can use as they see fit, has led to intense me- dia attention and legislative debate, as well as numerous studies and information sources.1 State welfare reform efforts that both preceded and emanated from the 1996 federal law are difficult to encapsulate in any one re- port or study. The difficulty lies partly in the fact that welfare re- form encompasses economic and administrative dilemmas at the national, state, and local levels, and also affects recipients in myriad ways. Many state welfare programs incorporate both conservative and liberal ideas and centralize some functions while dispersing others to local control. In so doing, they reflect the federal legislation that helped shape — if not spawn — much of the state action. One way to capture the nuances of some of this complexity — and thus to better understand the nature and potential outcomes of the experiment on which the nation has embarked—is to focus on a few key states. That is what this book does. The authors take a close 1 Learning from the Leaders: Welfare Reform and Policy in Five Midwestern States look at the political forces propelling welfare reform in Kansas, Michigan, Minnesota, Ohio, and Wisconsin.
    [Show full text]
  • Look to the Governors— Federalism Still Lives by Karlyn H
    Chapter 4 Table 1: House Vote, By Income Group 1994 1996 1998 D R D R D R Less than $15,000 60% 37% 61% 36% 57% 39% $15,000-$30,000 50 48 54 43 53 44 $30,000-$50,000 44 54 49 49 48 49 $50,000-$75,000 45 54 47 52 44 54 $75,000+ 38 61 39 59 45 52 Source: Surveys by Voter News Service. tion, health care, Social Security. The effect was predictable: or more is growing rapidly and can’t be taken for granted a significant shift in support from Republican candidates to anymore. The GOP must decide what issues will allow it to Democratic ones. That result creates a dilemma for the GOP hold onto the gains made among non-affluent voters while not as it looks ahead to the next House elections. On the one hand, losing any more ground with the affluent. whatever the causes for the GOP’s loss of support among the affluent, those same causes apparently helped Republicans The extent to which the Republicans are successful, and gain enough ground with non-affluent voters to hold onto a the extent to which the Democrats can thwart their strategy, House majority. But the voter bloc of those making $75,000 could determine who controls the House in 2000. Look to the Governors— Federalism Still Lives By Karlyn H. Bowman In his 1988 book, Laboratories of Democracy, political Eight of the country’s ten most populous states have Republi- writer David Osborne urged readers to look beyond Washing- can governors.
    [Show full text]
  • House Resolution No
    The Speaker, on behalf of the entire membership of the House of Representatives, offered the following resolution: House Resolution No. 363. A resolution for the Honorable Alma G. Stallworth. Whereas, It is truly an honor and a privilege to salute Alma G. Stallworth as she brings to a close a long and distinguished career of service within the Michigan House of Representatives. Indeed in the era of term limits, Alma Stallworth's tenure in the House of Representatives is unique in that it has included terms over the course of three decades. She served under the leadership of four governors: William Milliken, James Blanchard, John Engler, and Jennifer Granholm; and five Speakers of the House of Representatives: William Ryan, Gary Owen, Lou Dodak, Curtis Hertel, and Paul Hillegonds; and Whereas, Alma Stallworth was the first female appointed chair of the House Public Utilities Committee, serving twelve years and forging major changes in state energy and communications policies. This record is more than a reflection of her spirit of public service and dedication, it is a sterling tribute to the respect in which she is held by the people of her district. There could be no finer testimony of her valuable accomplishments; and Whereas, Alma Stallworth received her master's degree in Education and Health Promotion from Chelsea University in London, England. She is better prepared to serve others, particularly the youth and families within her community. Youth services to neighborhood and civic organizations have derived great benefit from her service. This commitment has been evident in all of her varied roles in the House of Representatives.
    [Show full text]
  • He Road to Charlottesville T the 1989 Education Summit
    covers.qx4 12/2/1999 10:11 AM Page 3 he Road to Charlottesville T The 1989 Education Summit A Publication of the National Education Goals Panel covers.qx4 12/2/1999 10:11 AM Page 4 Current Members National Education Goals Panel Governors Paul E. Patton, Kentucky (D), Chairman 1999 John Engler, Michigan (R) Jim Geringer, Wyoming (R) James B. Hunt, Jr., North Carolina (D) Frank Keating, Oklahoma (R) Frank O’Bannon, Indiana (D) Tommy Thompson, Wisconsin (R) Cecil H. Underwood, West Virginia (R) Members of the Administration Michael Cohen, Special Assistant to the U.S. Secretary of Education (D) Richard W. Riley, U.S. Secretary of Education (D) Members of Congress U.S. Senator Jeff Bingaman, New Mexico (D) U.S. Senator Jim Jeffords, Vermont (R) U.S. Representative William F. Gooding, Pennsylvania (R) U.S. Representative Matthew G. Martinez, California (D) State Legislators Representative G. Spencer Coggs, Wisconsin (D) Representative Mary Lou Cowlishaw, Illinois (R) Representative Douglas R. Jones, Idaho (R) Senator Stephen Stoll, Missouri (D) Executive Director Ken Nelson negp30a.qx4 12/2/1999 10:18 AM Page iii he Road to Charlottesville T The 1989 Education Summit Maris A. Vinovskis Department of History, Institute for Social Research, and School of Public Policy University of Michigan September 1999 A Publication of the National Education Goals Panel negp30a.qx4 12/2/1999 10:18 AM Page iv Paper prepared for the National Education Goals Panel (NEGP). I am grateful to a number of individuals who have provided assistance. I want to thank Emily Wurtz of NEGP and EEI Communications in Alexandria, Virginia, for their editorial assis- tance.
    [Show full text]
  • BEFORE the FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION in the Matter of MUR
    BEFORE THE FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION In the Matter of 1 ) MUR 4885 1 RESPONSE OF THE REPUBLICAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE TO THE SUBPOENA TO PRODUCE DOCUMENTS AND ORDER TO SUBMIT WRITTEN ANSWERS The FLepublican National Committee ("RNC") hereby responds to the Subpoena to Produce Documents and Order to Subinit Written Answers issued by the Federal Election Conimission ("Commission") in the above-referenced matter. I'ursuant to the Commission's Instructions and Document Requests and Interrogatories. thc discovery request is limited to documents and information from February I, 1995 to present, relating to the April 3, 1995 combined $1 5,000 contribution inadc to the RNC by Mr. Gary G. Jacobs and his wife. It should also be noted that the RNC has redacted certain non-responsive portions of document,s that i: is submitting to the Commission. The RNC nssures the Commission that these redacted areas do not include information requested by the Commission in the above-referenced matter. Furthermore, although the Commission's Subpoena and Order refercncc an attachment of "March 27, I998 Correspondence from I Ialcy R. Barbour (1 pagc)," the RNC did not receive the referenced attachinent. Since the RNC could not take into account said attachment when foriiiulating its response, the RNC hereby rcservcs the right to supplement its response after receiving the attachment in question from the Commission. WRITTEN ANSWERS A. C'onc.e,ning the solicircrriot?qf'the conrr.ihirtion: 1. The solicitation was made by Mr. Wayne Bemian, a member of tlilc 1995 RNC Gala Committee. during a .Innirary, 199s "plionc day" pledgc drivc at tlie Willard Hotel in Washington, D.C.
    [Show full text]
  • The Origination of Michigan's
    THE ORIGINATION OF MICHIGAN’S CHARTER SCHOOL POLICY: AN HISTORICAL ANALYSIS By James N. Goenner A DISSERTATION Submitted to Michigan State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Educational Administration 2011 ABSTRACT THE ORIGINATION OF MICHIGAN’S CHARTER SCHOOL POLICY: AN HISTORICAL ANALYSIS By James N. Goenner In 1993, Michigan Governor John Engler called the bluff of a political rival, which resulted in the nearly overnight elimination of Michigan’s school funding system and created an opportunity for him to advance his vision for broader educational reform. This study illustrates how Engler functioned as a public policy entrepreneur to take advantage of this window of opportunity in order to advance his vision for a competitive educational marketplace. The idea of using choice and competition to create an educational marketplace had been commonly associated with attempts to privatize public education through vouchers. This posed a seemingly impossible hurdle for Engler, as Michigan’s Constitution has a strict prohibition preventing public funds from being used by non-public schools. Engler was an avid reader and was always searching for new ideas. So when charter schools began to emerge on the educational landscape as a way to withdraw the exclusive control schools districts held over the provision of public education and establish new public schools that could provide choice and competition to the extant system, Engler was intrigued. Applying Schneider, Teske & Mintrom’s (1995) theory of public policy entrepreneurs, the study shows how Engler performed the three essential functions that all entrepreneurs undertake to accomplish their goals in order to originate Michigan’s charter school policy.
    [Show full text]
  • Selection Jury
    The Broad Prize 2002 Selection Jury Lamar Alexander, Former US Secretary of Education Lamar Alexander is currently the Goodman visiting professor of the practice of public service at Harvard University. He is a former United States Secretary of Education, Governor of Tennessee and President of the University of Tennessee. As the Secretary of Education, he helped former President Bush push for higher academic standards, "break the mold schools" and a GI Bill for Kids to give poor families more choices of good schools. As Governor, Alexander helped Tennessee become the first state to pay teachers more for teaching well. As Chairman of the National Governors Association, he began "Time for Results", the governors' five-year initiative to create better schools. The Education Commission of the States and the National Collegiate Athletic Association have given him their highest honors, the James B. Conant and Teddy Roosevelt awards. Henry Cisneros, Chairman and CEO, American CityVista Henry Cisneros is Founder and Chairman of American CityVista, a joint homebuilding venture he formed with Kaufman and Broad (now KB Home) in August of 2000. Previously, he was President and Chief Operating Officer of Univision Communications in Los Angeles, the Spanish-language broadcaster that has become the fifth most-watched television network in the nation. In 1993, he became President Clinton’s first Secretary of Housing and Urban Development. Cisneros was the first Hispanic American mayor of a major U.S. city when he was elected Mayor of San Antonio in 1981. During his four terms as Mayor of San Antonio, Cisneros helped rebuild the city’s economic base and created jobs through massive infrastructure and downtown improvements, making San Antonio one of the most progressive cities in the nation.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Our Apps Today (Or Simply Surf to Mackinac.Org on Your Mobile Phone)
    The Newsletter of the Mackinac Center for Public Policy www.mackinac.org FALL 2012 Check the MIballot2012.org flap! MIballot2012.org MIballot2012.org A QUICK Michigan voters will face a multitude of ballot REFERENCE GUIDE TO proposals when they go to Michigan’S the polls this November. BALLOT Several proposals involve PROPOSALS special constituencies, Senior Investigative Reporter Anne Schieber: particularly public-sector Proposal 1: unions. Referendum on the The “collective bargaining” Emergency Manager Law Tales From a Hot Dog Cart amendment, for example, Referendum on a 2011 state would allow unions t’s unpredictable what sets off a sixth or seventh to call. I was the first. law that expanded the authority firestorm. I am referring, of course, The media was missing this or simply of state-appointed emergency unprecedented power toI the case of 13-year-old Nathan not recognizing how outrageous it truly managers in fiscally failing school over legislators. Another districts and local governments. Duszynski, who wanted to help his was. Nathan’s mother, Lynette Johnson, The expanded powers include measure would provide struggling family by running a hot dog answered the phone and began invalidating government union constitutional protection labor agreement provisions. cart in downtown Holland. Nathan’s reiterating his story, with for the unionization of fledgling business was shut down within an additional bombshell. Proposal 2: home-based caregivers who minutes of opening by a city zoning She and Nathan’s stepfather The ‘Collective Bargaining’ receive Medicaid payments. Amendment officer. Patrick Wright, director of the were hoping Nathan’s business Join the conversation on This proposal would enshrine Mackinac Center Legal Foundation, could turn into a family operation so union collective bargaining power Facebook and Twitter! spotted the story online from the that they could get off government in the Michigan Constitution.
    [Show full text]
  • How Fiscally Conservative? Gary Johnson's Spending Record Vs
    Rio Grande Foundation Liberty, Opportunity, Prosperity New Mexico How Fiscally Conservative? Gary Johnson's Spending Record vs. his Republican Contemporaries By Tristan Goodwin with Paul Gessing July 19, 2016 The 2016 presidential election has been like few others. For a number of reasons, the Libertarian Party candidate, former New Mexico Gary Johnson, has gained unprecedented levels of interest as he fights for inclusion in the presidential debates to be held later this year. Fiscally- conservative Republicans, many of whom may be concerned about the rhetoric of their party's standard-bearer Donald Trump, may be looking for alternatives. Former New Mexico governor and current Libertarian Party presidential candidate Gary Johnson is a likely alternative for these disenchanted voters, but his spending record has come under attack from some corners. In a National Review column, writer James Spiller argued that the record of former New Mexico governor and current Libertarian candidate for president Gary Johnson is “not conservative and not even all that libertarian” based largely on Johnson's fiscal record which he further labels “big-government.” Is this true? Is Gary Johnson really just another big-government politician? Before answering that question, it is worth noting that a governor’s role in the budgetary process is necessarily cooperative. Proposing and vetoing the budget cannot accomplish a policy agenda, and when the legislature is held by a different party, it is even harder to hold a governor accountable for every bit of spending which crosses their desk. Deciding how fiscally conservative or liberal a governor is necessitates examining the legislative climate under which they operated.
    [Show full text]
  • Gerald R. Ford Oral History Project John Engler Interviewed by Richard Norton Smith January 27, 2010
    Gerald R. Ford Oral History Project John Engler Interviewed by Richard Norton Smith January 27, 2010 Smith: First of all, thank you so much for doing this. Engler: Well, thank you, I’m happy to sit down. Smith: I want to talk a little about you and your entry into the big ring, if you will. You were a leading member of this whole generation of Republican governors, conservative Republican governors, who nevertheless were seen as creative in their conservatism, as problem solvers. I don’t know whether pragmatists is a misnomer or a pejorative, but in any event I would have thought that would have been very, very much Gerald Ford’s style; very reflective of his approach as well. Tell us about your life before it crossed paths with President Ford. Engler: My first meeting with Gerald Ford that I can recall, where I actually had a chance to sit and talk with him, was when Elford [Al] Cederberg, one of his colleagues from the Congress, brought him to Mt. Pleasant, Michigan to speak to a little Lincoln Day dinner for Isabella County. It always struck me, the humility of the leader of the Republicans of the United States House of Representatives out on the road. And, of course, it was only later – I was a rookie state representative, it may have been my first or second term, so I’m in my early twenties in office – and I’m meeting this leader of the Republicans, who’s been in Congress a long time. I was born in ’48; so roughly at the time I was born, he goes there.
    [Show full text]
  • CQ's Governor's Race Rankings — Republican Seats
    CQ’s Governor’s Race Rankings — Republican Seats The following are Congressional Quarterly’s rankings of this year’s 23 contests for governorships held by Republican incum- bents. “No Clear Favorite” means neither party has a definite lead. “Leans” means that the named party has an edge, but the con- test appears competitive. “Favored” means that the named party has a definite lead, but an upset cannot be completely ruled out. “Safe Republican” means that the party appears certain to win the contest. State Incumbent First Won Last Vote Contenders Democrat Favored RHODE ISLAND Lincoln C. Almond 1994 51-42% D: State Atty. Gen. Sheldon Whitehouse; ex- (term-limited) (1998) state Sen./’94,’98 gov. nominee Myrth York; state Rep. Tony Pires R: Businessmen Jim Bennett, Don Carcieri Leans Democratic ILLINOIS George H. Ryan 1998 51-47% D: Rep. Rod Blagojevich (retiring) (1998) R: State Atty. Gen. Jim Ryan (nominated in March 19 primary) MICHIGAN John Engler 1990 62-38% D: Rep. David E. Bonior; ex-Gov. Jim Blanchard; (Primary Aug. 6) (term-limited) (1998) state Atty. Gen. Jennifer Granholm R: Lt. Gov. Dick Posthumus; state Sen. Joe Schwarz NEW MEXICO Gary E. Johnson 1994 55-45% D: Ex-Energy Secy./ex-Rep. Bill Richardson (term-limited) (1998) R: State Rep. John Sanchez (nominated in June 4 primary) PENNSYLVANIA Mark Schweiker Moved up N/A D: Ex-Philadelphia Mayor Ed Rendell (retiring) from lt. gov.2 R: State Atty. Gen. Mike Fisher (nominated in May 21 primary) No Clear Favorite ARIZONA Jane Dee Hull 1998 61-36% D: State Atty.
    [Show full text]
  • Teachers' Unions in Hard Times
    TEACHERS’ UNIONS IN HARD TIMES by William Lowe Boyd The Pennsylvania State University David N. Plank Michigan State University and Gary Sykes Michigan State University Paper prepared for the conference on "Teachers’ Unions and Educational Reform" held at the Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA September 24-25, 1998 TEACHERS’ UNIONS IN HARD TIMES William Lowe Boyd, David N. Plank, and Gary Sykes1 “How are the mighty fallen, and the weapons of war perished!” II Samuel, 1:26-27 INTRODUCTION In the 1970s and 1980s, teachers’ unions in Michigan and Pennsylvania were among the most powerful in the United States. They won rapid and substantial gains for their members, in large part because of their readiness to send teachers out on strike, and they played a dominant role in school politics and state politics more generally. With the election of activist Republican Governors in both Michigan and Pennsylvania in the 1990s, however, the power of the teachers’ unions began a precipitous decline. They now find themselves in an extremely weak position in both states. Rather than being the protagonists of reform they are by-standers at the reform parade, and even at times the objects of reforms initiated by their political adversaries. In Michigan, Governor John Engler and his allies have devoted considerable political energy to reducing the power of teachers’ unions, portraying the unions as obstacles to needed changes in the educational system and justifying their attacks on the unions as essential steps toward educational reform. Michigan’s teachers’ unions have played into this strategy, and arguably made their own situation worse, by responding to political attacks with transparently political counterattacks, by predictably and vehemently opposing proposals for educational change put forward by their political rivals, by insisting that educational improvement necessarily requires more money for the public school system, and by defending the claim that an attack on the teachers’ unions is the same as an attack on public education.
    [Show full text]