Florida Seaports Add Value
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
The Five-Year Florida Seaport Mission Plan
Florida Seaport Transportation and Economic Development Council www.aports.org THE FIVE-YEAR FLORIDA SEAPORT MISSION PLAN PORT CANAVERAL PORT CITRUS PORT OF FERNANDINA PORT OF FORT PIERCE JAXPORT PORT OF KEY WEST PORT MANATEE PORTMIAMI PORT OF PALM BEACH PORT PANAMA CITY PORT OF PENSACOLA PORT OF PORT ST. JOE PORT OF ST. PETERSBURG PORT TAMPA BAY PORT EVERGLADES 2014 2018 OUR MISSION Ports work to enhance the economic vitality and quality of life in the state of Florida by fostering the growth of domestic and international waterborne commerce. Charged with facilitating the implementation of seaport capital improvement projects, the Florida Seaport Transportation and Economic Development Council (FSTED) consists of the port directors of the 15 publicly- owned seaports and a representative from both the Department of Transportation and the Department of Economic Opportunity. The Florida Ports Council administers the FSTED program and staffs the Council. OUR MANDATE Florida’s deepwater seaports, as mandated by Chapter 163, Florida Statutes, prepare master plans to guide their development and expansion. Regularly updated plans, consistent with the comprehensive plans of the seaports’ respective local governments, establish goals and objectives, address forecasted needs, and identify five-year capital seaport improvement programs to implement. OUR GOALS Develop world-class cargo and cruise facilities to enhance Florida’s global competitiveness. Build system-wide, seamless intermodal facilities to move port goods and passengers efficiently and cost effectively. Capitalize on increased north-south trade and the Panama Canal expansion to capture more direct all-water service and feeder calls. Strengthen and diversify strategic seaport funding to ensure vital and timely improvements. -
2018 Update of Tables and Figures
2018 Update of Tables and Figures August 2019 INTRODUCTION This document provides an update to the majority of data tables and figures provided in the Florida Department of Transportation’s (FDOT) 2015 Florida Seaport System Plan. The annual updating of seaport system plan data allows FDOT to: implement the plan using the latest industry metrics; provide analysis of long-term trends; and, provide a foundation for future five-year plan updates. The information collected for this update are the 2018 seaport metrics including the number of containers in twenty-foot equivalent units (TEUs), cargo tonnages, total number of revenue cruise passengers, and several other items. The primary source of the data is the individual Florida Seaports and the Florida Seaport Five-Year Mission Plans. In addition, some of the data comes from official government sources. Maintaining this data on an annual basis will lay the foundation of information necessary for the 2020 Florida Seaport Plan to build upon. The purpose statement and vision of the 2015 plan are restated below. The updated Figures and Tables follow. It should be noted, not all tables and figures in the 2015 plan were updated as: some data sources are not updated annually; some source data has not been updated; or, the 2015 data is still up to date. STATEMENT OF PURPOSE This 2015 Florida Seaport System Plan was prepared in accordance with the statutory requirements of Section 311.14(1), Florida Statutes (F.S.). The development of this plan, along with other modal plans developed under the Freight, Logistics, and Passenger Operations (FLP) Office at the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT), provides the Department with a cohesive planning process for all the modal offices. -
Appendix A: Historic Context and References
APPENDIX A: HISTORIC CONTEXT AND REFERENCES FROM THE HISTORIC PROPERTIES RESURVEY, CITY OF FERNANDINA BEACH, NASSAU COUNTY, FLORIDA, BLAND AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 2007 Colonial Period, 1565-1821 Founded in the early nineteenth century and incorporated in 1824, Fernandina Beach is one of Florida's oldest cities. The principal city of Nassau County, Fernandina Beach is located on the north end of Amelia Island, which has a colonial heritage associated with early French explorers, the First Spanish period, the British period, and the Second Spanish period. Early French explorers named the island "Isle de Mai" and Pedro Menendez built a fort there in 1567. In 1598 and 1675, Spanish missions built on the island contributed to a larger system implemented by the Spanish Crown to convert the Indians to Catholicism. In 1702, an English incursion from Charleston, South Carolina, attacked St. Augustine, but also invaded an outpost on the island and threatened the missions. Later, in 1735, when James Oglethorpe attempted to secure the St. Marys River as the southern boundary of his new colony, the Georgian scouted the island, which he named Amelia for one of King George II's daughters (Johannes 2000:3-4). Between 1513 and 1763, Spain failed to settle permanently any area of Florida except the immediate environs of St. Augustine. Besides establishing a permanent base at the port city and a chain of missions into the interior, the Spanish accomplished little of lasting significance. Farmers and ranchers cleared land for cattle, and planted crops and fruit trees. But, the growth of English colonies to the north in the 1700s and forays by settlers and militia into Florida destabilized Spain's nascent agricultural economy and mission system. -
Macgregor╎s Invasion of Florida
Florida Historical Quarterly Volume 7 Number 1 Florida Historical Quarterly, Vol 7, Article 5 Issue 1 1928 MacGregor’s Invasion of Florida T. Frederick Davis Part of the American Studies Commons, and the United States History Commons Find similar works at: https://stars.library.ucf.edu/fhq University of Central Florida Libraries http://library.ucf.edu This Article is brought to you for free and open access by STARS. It has been accepted for inclusion in Florida Historical Quarterly by an authorized editor of STARS. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Recommended Citation Davis, T. Frederick (1928) "MacGregor’s Invasion of Florida," Florida Historical Quarterly: Vol. 7 : No. 1 , Article 5. Available at: https://stars.library.ucf.edu/fhq/vol7/iss1/5 Davis: MacGregor’s Invasion of Florida MACGREGOR’S INVASION OF FLORIDA, 1817. By T. F REDERICK D AVIS Gregor MacGregor was the grandson of Gregor MacGregor, the Scotchman, who enlisted in the Black Watch, then Semphill’s Highlanders, and was called in Gaelic “Gregor, the Beautiful.” When the regiment was first ordered to England, in 1743, “Gregor, the Beautiful” and two others were sent on in advance to London, so that the king of England, who was on the point of starting for the continent, might see some soldiers of the regiment before leaving. One of the men died en route, but MacGregor and the other were paraded before the king at St. James’s and gave an ex- hibition of their dexterity with the broadsword and Lochabar axe. Both afterwards rose to commissions. MacGregor subsequently joined another regiment. -
Navigation Regulations
19 SEP 2021 U.S. Coast Pilot 4, Chapter 2 ¢ 35 Navigation Regulations (1) This chapter contains extracts from Code of Federal (6) United States Coast Guard–33 CFR 26, 80, 81, Regulations (CFR) that are of importance to mariners 82, 88, 89, 90, 110, 117, 157, 160, 162, 164, 165, 167 and in the area covered by this Coast Pilot. Sections of little 169; 46 CFR 15 value to the mariner are sometimes omitted. Omitted (7) United States Army Corps of Engineers–33 CFR sections are signified by the following [...] 207 and 334 (2) Extracts from the following titles are contained in (8) Environmental Protection Agency–40 CFR 140 this chapter. (9) (3) TITLE 15–COMMERCE AND FOREIGN TRADE Title 15: Commerce and Foreign Trade Part 922—National Marine Sanctuary Program Regulations Title 33: Navigation and Navigable Waters (10) Part 26—Vessel Bridge-to-Bridge Radiotelephone Regulations Part 922–National Marine Sanctuary Part 80—COLREGS Demarcation Lines Program Regulations Part 81—72 COLREGS: Implementing Rules Part 82—72 COLREGS: Interpretive Rules (11) Part 88—Annex V: Pilot Rules Part 89—Inland Navigation Rules: Implementing Rules Subpart A–General Part 90—Inland Rules: Interpretive Rules Part 110—Anchorage Regulations (12) Part 117—Drawbridge Operation Regulations §922.1 Applicability of regulations. Part 157—Rules for the Protection of the Marine Environment (13) Unless noted otherwise, the regulations in subparts Relating to Tank Vessels Carrying Oil in Bulk (in part) A, D, and E of this part apply to all National Marine Part 160—Ports and Waterways Safety-General Sanctuaries and related site-specific regulations set forth Part 162—Inland Waterways Navigation Regulations in this part. -
WHEREAS, the Ocean, Highway and Port Authority of Nassau
RESOLUTION NUMBER 801 CITY OF FERNANDINA BEACH, FLORIDA WHEREAS, the Ocean, Highway and Port Authority of Nassau County, Florida, has applied to the Department of Community Affairs of the State of Florida for a Preliminary Development Agreement for the development of Site "A"of the proposed port facility (consisting of Sites "A",B" "and "C")and ; WHEREAS, the City Commission of the City of Fernandina Beach, Florida, has determined it to be in the best interests of the citizens of the said City that the Preliminary Development Agreement be approved subject to certain conditions. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF FERNANDINA BEACH, FLORIDA, that the Department of Coirnnunity Affairs is hereby requested to approve the Preliminary Develop- ment Agreement for the development of Site "A"of the proposed port facility as submitted by the Ocean, Highway and Port Authority of Nassau County, subject to the following conditions: 1) The port will not import nor export petroleum products, coal or hazardous materials without re-submitting an amended ADA/DRI. 2) Equitable annual fees will be negotiated to fund City services normally funded through ad valorem taxes.. These include fire and police protection, street maintenance, administrative and recreation services. 3) There will be no exemption from fees which fund City wastewater treatment and sanitation (trash and garbage;- services. 4a) Impact fees imposed by City Ordinance Number 704 and others for capital improvements will be paid at the time construction permits are issued. These fees are specifically dedicated to facilities for: a) Wastewater Treatment b) Fire Protection c) Police Protection d) Sanitation e) Recreation f) Administration 4b) If completed application(s)for construction permits are not made within two ( 2)years from current date, all project approvals by the City s~?,~.11 lapse and be of no further force or effect. -
Bill Analysis and Fiscal Impact Statement
The Florida Senate BILL ANALYSIS AND FISCAL IMPACT STATEMENT (This document is based on the provisions contained in the legislation as of the latest date listed below.) Prepared By: The Professional Staff of the Committee on Rules BILL: CS/CS/CS/SB 426 INTRODUCER: Rules Committee; Community Affairs Committee; Transportation Committee; and Senator Boyd SUBJECT: State Preemption of Seaport Regulations DATE: April 15, 2021 REVISED: ANALYST STAFF DIRECTOR REFERENCE ACTION 1. Price Vickers TR Fav/CS 2. Paglialonga Ryon CA Fav/CS 3. Price Phelps RC Fav/CS Please see Section IX. for Additional Information: COMMITTEE SUBSTITUTE - Substantial Changes I. Summary: CS/CS/CS/SB 426 prohibits a local ballot initiative or referendum from restricting maritime commerce in Florida’s seaports. The prohibition applies, but is not limited, to restricting such commerce based on any of the following: Vessel type, size, number, or capacity. Number, origin, nationality, embarkation, or disembarkation of passenger or crew or their entry into this state of any local jurisdiction. Source, type, loading, or unloading of cargo. Environmental or health records of a particular vessel or vessel line. Any conflicting local ballot initiative or referendum adopted before, on, or after the effective date of the act, and any local law, charter amendment, ordinance, resolution, regulation, or policy adopted in such an initiative or referendum is prohibited, void, and expressly preempted to the state. The bill also prohibits a local government, or a political subdivision -
Subchapter P—Ports and Waterways Safety
SUBCHAPTER P—PORTS AND WATERWAYS SAFETY PART 160—PORTS AND Subpart A—General WATERWAYS SAFETY—GENERAL § 160.1 Purpose. Subpart A—General (a) This subchapter contains regula- tions implementing the Ports and Wa- Sec. terways Safety Act (33 U.S.C. 1221) and 160.1 Purpose. related statutes. 160.3 Definitions. 160.5 Delegations. § 160.3 Definitions. 160.7 Appeals. For the purposes of this subchapter: Subpart B—Control of Vessel and Facility Bulk means material in any quantity Operations that is shipped, stored, or handled without the benefit of package, label, 160.101 Purpose. mark or count and carried in integral 160.103 Applicability. or fixed independent tanks. 160.105 Compliance with orders. Captain of the Port means the Coast 160.107 Denial of entry. Guard officer designated by the Com- 160.109 Waterfront facility safety. mandant to command a Captain of the 160.111 Special orders applying to vessel op- erations. Port Zone as described in part 3 of this 160.113 Prohibition of vessel operation and chapter. cargo transfers. Commandant means the Commandant 160.115 Withholding of clearance. of the United States Coast Guard. Deviation means any departure from Subpart C—Notifications of Arrival, Haz- any rule in this subchapter. ardous Conditions, and Certain Dan- Director, Vessel Traffic Services means gerous Cargoes the Coast Guard officer designated by the Commandant to command a Vessel 160.201 General. Traffic Service (VTS) as described in 160.202 Definitions. part 161 of this chapter. 160.203 Applicability. 160.204 Exemptions and exceptions . District Commander means the Coast 160.205 Notices of arrival. -
FLORIDA SEAPORT FAST FACTS (Current As of January 1, 2020)
FLORIDA SEAPORT FAST FACTS (Current as of January 1, 2020) • Florida’s public seaports line the Atlantic and Gulf coasts. Port Canaveral JAXPORT Port of Pensacola Port Citrus Port of Key West Port of Port St. Joe Port Everglades Port Manatee Port St. Pete Port of Fernandina PortMiami Port Tampa Bay Port of Fort Pierce Port Panama City Port of Palm Beach • Waterborne international trade moving through these seaports was valued at $87.3 billion in 2018. This $87.3 billion represented 55.6 percent of Florida’s $156.9 billion total international trade. • Of the $87.3 billion in waterborne international trade, $54.2 billion were in imports; $33.1 billion in exports. • In 2018, containerized cargo vessels carried $57.4 billion in trade to and from Florida, up 5.5 percent over the prior year. About $33.6 billion, or 58.6 percent, were imports and $23.7 billion, or 41.4 percent, were exports. • Florida’s waterborne international and domestic cargo for 2018 remained stable at 110 million tons. • The value of containerized cargo increased by 5.5 percent to $57.4 billion, with more than 4.1 million TEUs handled at Florida seaports in FY 2018. • At 53.6 million tons, domestic cargo representing 48.7 percent of all cargo moving through Florida seaports. • Florida ranked as the eighth-largest export state in 2018. • While Brazil – the state’s largest trade partner – gained a modest 3.1% overall, second-ranked China expanded by another 11.2% in 2018 thanks to double-digit growth in imports. • The state’s top ten trade partners were: Brazil, China, Chile, Japan, Colombia, Mexico, Dominican Republic, Germany, Honduras and Costa Rica. -
State of Florida Ports the Seaport Effect Port Canaveral Port Citrus
State of Florida Ports FLORIDA SEAPORTS CHARTING OUR FUTURE 2012/2013 The Seaport Effect Port Canaveral Port Citrus Port Everglades Port of Fernandina Port of Fort Pierce Port of Jacksonville Port of Key West Port Manatee PortMiami Port of Palm Beach Port Panama City Port of Pensacola Port of Port St. Joe Port of St. Petersburg Port of Tampa Florida Seaport Transportation and Economic Development Council www.flaports.org TABLE OF CONTENTS SEAPORTS – FLORIDA’S LASTING ADVANTAGE 2 FLORIDA SEAPORT PROFILES SEAPORTS CHARTING OUR FUTURE Port Canaveral 12 Port Citrus 15 Port Everglades 16 Port of Fernandina 19 Port of Fort Pierce 21 Port of Jacksonville 23 Port of Key West 26 Port Manatee 28 PortMiami 30 Port of Palm Beach 33 Port Panama City 36 Port of Pensacola 38 Port of Port St. Joe 40 Port of St. Petersburg 42 Port of Tampa 43 Florida Ports Council Florida Seaport Transportation and Economic Development Council 502 East Jefferson Street Tallahassee, Florida 32301 850.222.8028 www.flaports.org Prepared February 2013 Follow us on Twitter and Facebook: Coastal Communications and Public Relations, Inc. SEAPORTS – FLORIDA’S LASTING ADVANTAGE Florida provides a strong seaport transportation network that is invigorating the economy now and will continue to build it for future Seaports are generations. The state’s 15 seaports are a crucial conduit, helping to experiencing a cycle of bring a full range of goods and services to people around the world. important change that They operate safely and securely, with an unwavering commitment to is reshaping Florida’s safeguarding the environment, and they infuse millions of dollars into logistics landscape, the economy, supporting millions of well-paying jobs in the process. -
Here Are Approximately 40,000 Vessels in the American Domestic Fleet
THE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF AMERICA’S DOMESTIC MARITIME INDUSTRY IN THE STATE OF FLORIDA A Major American Maritime State Florida ranks second among all domestic maritime states. The American domestic maritime industry includes vessel operators, marine terminals, shipyards, and workers engaged in the movement of cargo exclusively within the U.S. The state of Florida ranks second among all states with 52,140 American maritime jobs tied to the domestic maritime industry. (Only Louisiana has slightly more.) Labor income related to the domestic maritime industry in Florida exceeds $2.97 billion annually. Total gross economic output related to the Florida’s domestic maritime industry is $9.69 billion annually, again second only to Louisiana. Florida is a major shipyard state, seventh nationally in shipbuilding-related jobs. A recent study of shipbuilding by the U.S. Maritime Administration, covering both commercial and military ship construction, found a $1.63 billion annual economic impact in Florida with 21,890 associated jobs. More than $1 billion in labor income is associated with the shipyard industry in Florida each year. Florida is the rare state that includes significant elements of all three major parts of the American domestic maritime industry -- vessel operating companies, ship construction and repair yards, and maritime industry workers and retirees. Also, the American commercial maritime industry works closely with the U.S. Navy throughout the state of Florida. Florida’s 4th Congressional District, including Jacksonville, is third among all U.S. Congressional Districts with 9,670 American domestic maritime industry jobs. Florida’s 5th Congressional District, also representing the Jacksonville area, also ranks among the top districts in the U.S. -
Fdot Programs to Support Florida's Independent
FDOT PROGRAMS TO SUPPORT FLORIDA’S INDEPENDENT SEAPORTS AAPA Infrastructure Development Seminar March 9-10, 2016 | San Diego, CA Bob Emerson, Manager, Seaport Office FDOT Florida Seaport System Port of Fernandina Public Seaports JAXPORT Port of Pensacola Port Panama 15 City Port of Port Container Ports St. Joe Cargo Seaports 3.3 million TEUs Port Citrus 9 Cruise Seaports Port Canaveral Other Seaports 0 1M 2M 3M 4M Port Port of St. Tampa Bay Petersburg Port Port of Fort Pierce Cruise Ports Manatee Port of Palm Beach 15.5 Million Revenue Passengers 7 Port Everglades 0 2M 4M 6M 8M 10M 12M 14M 16M PortMiami Bulk Cargoes 22.1 Million Metric Tons Dry Bulk Port of Key West 8 49.1 Million Metric Tons Liquid Bulk 0 5M 10M 15M 20M 25M 30M 35M 40M 45M 50M PortMiami Port Everglades JAXPORT Port Tampa Bay Port Canaveral Port of Palm Beach Port Panama City Port Manatee Port of Pensacola Port of Fernandina Florida Seaports Governance Structures Independent Elected Boards: • Port of Fernandina • Port Canaveral • Port of Palm Beach County Commission as Separate Port Authority: • Port Manatee County Commission: • Port of Fort Pierce • Port Citrus Commission Appointed by the Governor: • Port of Port St. Joe Florida Seaports Governance Structures Appointed Positions by Governor and Mayor: • JAXPORT Appointed Positions by Governor and Positions for Mayor and a County Commissioner: • Port Tampa Bay Appointed by City Commission: • Port Panama City Department of City Government: • Port of Key West • Port of Pensacola • Port of St. Petersburg Department of County Government: • PortMiami • Port Everglades Seaports & Modal Network Port of Fernandina JAXPORT Port of Pensacola Port Panama City Port of Port St.