DOCSLIB.ORG

THE COUNTERTERRORISM DIMENSION by Isaac Kfir*

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
THE COUNTERTERRORISM DIMENSION by Isaac Kfir* BRITISH MIDDLE EAST POLICY: THE COUNTERTERRORISM DIMENSION By Isaac Kfir* The emergence of Islamist terrorism has had a tremendous impact on the United Kingdom. The British government has pursued controversial domestic and foreign policies. This paper reviews some of the key measures and also the British involvement in Iraq and Afghanistan. It holds that the continuous clashes between the different branches of government has undermined Britain’s ability to contend with the threat raised by Islamic radicals, which is like no other. The British government decision to support to get technology is there.”3 Around the the U.S.-led “War on Terror” placed the same time, Metropolitan Police United Kingdom at the epicenter of the Commissioner Sir Ian Blair stated, in a campaign, forcing the adoption of policies, comment on the August 2006 transatlantic strategies, programs, and other measures to airline bomb plot, that “the apparent speed deal with the Islamists—even though with which young, reasonably affluent, initially there was no indication that the UK some reasonably well educated British-born was a target of al-Qa’ida.1 Unfortunately, people” had become radicalized and willing the threat became a reality on July 7, 2005, to commit mass murders through suicide when four British-Muslims undertook a attacks was worrying.4 Significantly, suicide bombing campaign that left more Manningham-Buller made it clear that due than 50 people dead across central London, to al-Qa'ida’s nature, the challenge faced by making July 7 the deadliest terror attack on the security forces was substantial. This British soil. Britain has since became a was seen with the Barot case, in which the major target of al-Qa’ida and Islamists, plot was forged in one country, approved in with some security officials believing that another, and executed elsewhere.5 Overall, Islamic radicals view “…7/7 as just the it is apparent that Britain is a key target of beginning.”2 In a November 2006 speech, Islamist terrorism.6 Consequently, there has Director-General of MI5 Dame Eliza been a call to toughen up anti-terrorism Manningham-Buller claimed 200 terrorist laws. This move, however, is likely to be networks involving at least 1,600 people resisted by civil libertarians and Muslims and 30 “Priority 1” plots to kill had been who claim that Britain’s anti-terrorism identified. Only a few days after measures are already far too stringent.7 Manningham-Buller’s speech, a senior Britain’s role in the global War on Foreign Office counter-terrorism expert Terror has led to a fierce public debate over claimed that there was “[n]o doubt at all” the country’s participation.8 There have that al-Qa’ida was seeking nuclear been mass demonstrations,9 the jailing of a technology to attack the West and Britain. British officer for refusing to serve in The official added, “We know the Iraq,10 a variety of legal challenges about aspiration is there, we know the attempt to detention and the powers of the state, and get material is there, we know the attempt questions concerning integration and the Middle East Review of International Affairs, Vol. 10, No. 4 (December 2006) 41 Isaac Kfir soundness of the measures promoted by the An analysis of British counter-terrorism government11 (such as immigration).12 It measures show that the British approach is has also raised the issue of what it means to based on four key elements: prevention be British. However, most of the debate and (tackling the factors that lead to the controversy have been over Britain’s radicalization and terrorist recruitment); foreign policy.13 In the words of Inayat protection of British people and British Bunglawala of the Muslim Council of interests; preparation in terms of ensuring Britain, “…the [British] government has that in the case of an attack, casualties been totally in denial about the impact of its would be minimized due to effective own policies, especially foreign policies, response; and the pursuit of terrorists and and how they may have contributed to the those who sponsor them. Under UK law, growth in extremism. That’s why the terrorism is regarded as a criminal act, with demand for a public inquiry must be crucial investigation and prevention falling on the to any discussion of terrorism.”14 Simply shoulders of the police, while the security put, there are Muslims who feel that their services focus on intelligence gathering and community and the umma (Islamic nation) the investigation of covert, organized are ignored, neglected, or discriminated threats.18 The military’s role within the against by mainstream Western society. It is domestic sphere could at best be defined as repeatedly noted by such Muslims that the supporting the civilian mechanism. In plight of Muslims in Palestine, Chechnya, foreign policy, the military plays a central Kashmir, and most recently in Lebanon are role in counter-terrorism through its active often forgotten or ignored by the military engagements with terrorists international community at large and the (combat) and nation-building, as seen in West in particular. Consequently, British Iraq and Afghanistan. Muslims have criticized various measures The transformation of Britain’s security adopted by the UK government to counter apparatus has been impressive, especially the threat posed by al-Qa’ida.15 They feel since July 7, 2005, but the continuous clash that these measures coupled with the usage between the various branches of of such terms as “radical Muslim cleric” government (particularly between the and “Islamic extremists” lead to the executive and the judiciary branches) vilification of the Muslim community and coupled with inter-communal tensions to Islamophobia, which plays into the hands makes the UK vulnerable not only to of the militants.16 At the other end, Muslim further acts of terrorism, but also as a leaders such as Ahmad al-Rawi, president potential breeding ground for terrorist of the Federation of Islamic Organizations recruitment. The British public must in Europe, declared at the Twenty-Third understand that the threat posed by al- Congress of the Union of Islamic Qa’ida and other Islamist terrorist groups is Organizations in France (UOIF), “In real and total.19 At present, there is a failure Britain, where we are more than 2 million, to appreciate that a global war is raging and there is less discrimination than in other that giving in to the Islamists would countries. We may practice our religion undermine contemporary and future world completely. Young women wearing society. Abandoning Iraq and Afghanistan headscarves are very active at school or would allow the militants to focus their universities.”17 attention on topping the regimes and instituting a Shari’a-based system, as seen 42 Middle East Review of International Affairs, Vol. 10, No. 4 (December 2006) British Middle East Policy: The Counterterrorism Dimension in Iran and previously in Afghanistan under Irish Republicans, arguably leading to their the Taliban. The government must improve decision to renounce the use of violence. In its public relations program to better the words of Frank Gregory and Paul educate the public of what the Islamists Wilkinson, “The UK’s armed forces and stand for, what they wish to achieve, and police have gained invaluable experience how their victory would impact the lives of and expertise in counterterrorism through people across the globe. three decades of involvement in the effort to suppress terrorism in Northern Ireland DEFINING THE ENEMY: INTERNAL and its overspill into the British VS. EXTERNAL mainland.”25 The emergence of Islamist terrorism of the al-Qa’ida model, however, There is considerable debate in is very new, as the religious conviction of academic and political circles as to how to these Muslims is so fierce that negotiation describe the al-Qa’ida movement and those is impossible. Moreover, there is no direct it inspires. There is a distinction between or even indirect contact. It is not known those who support the al-Qa’ida agenda where the jihadists are located, especially wholeheartedly and take up arms to fulfill the al-Qa’ida hierarchy, who nowadays its mantra and those who decry the exist to inspire operations rather than treatment received by the Muslim undertake and design ones.26 community at the hands of contemporary society. Thus, within the confines of this Britain’s Counter-Terrorism Legislation paper, the terms “jihadists” or “Islamists”20 and Other Measures are preferred when discussing Muslims who strive for “pure Islam”—the strict The horror and the fear caused by the adherence to Shari’a. Such Muslims are indiscriminate, callous, and methodical act angry primarily at Arab regimes that they of violence that occurred in the United claim have abandoned the true ways of States on September 11, 2001, propelled the Islam while drawing support from the West UK government to adopt an activist and predominately the United States, who legislative program, while also making it also give Israel unconditional support.21 It clear (and even more so after the London is, however, somewhat ironic that these bombings and French riots) that the root Muslims are willing to use the liberal causes of terrorism must be studied in great system as well as the comfort and security depth. The House of Commons Select offered by Western society22 to recruit new Committee on Home Affairs found that: members and support the jihadist mantra to ensure the emancipation of the Muslim …the new terrorism legislation world from the hands of the infidels.23 cannot and must not simply be a set of police and judicial powers. It BRITAIN AND TERRORISM must be part of an explicit broader anti-terrorism strategy. In the Britain has dealt with “terrorists” both context of international terrorism, it domestically and internationally for must explicitly and specifically set centuries.24 The country’s security out how British Muslim leaders will apparatus made substantial gains against be supported in assisting British various terrorist organizations, especially Middle East Review of International Affairs, Vol.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Leftist Case for War in Iraq •fi William Shawcross, Allies
    Fordham International Law Journal Volume 27, Issue 6 2003 Article 6 Vengeance And Empire: The Leftist Case for War in Iraq – William Shawcross, Allies: The U.S., Britain, Europe, and the War in Iraq Hal Blanchard∗ ∗ Copyright c 2003 by the authors. Fordham International Law Journal is produced by The Berke- ley Electronic Press (bepress). http://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/ilj Vengeance And Empire: The Leftist Case for War in Iraq – William Shawcross, Allies: The U.S., Britain, Europe, and the War in Iraq Hal Blanchard Abstract Shawcross is superbly equipped to assess the impact of rogue States and terrorist organizations on global security. He is also well placed to comment on the risks of preemptive invasion for existing alliances and the future prospects for the international rule of law. An analysis of the ways in which the international community has “confronted evil,” Shawcross’ brief polemic argues that U.S. President George Bush and British Prime Minister Tony Blair were right to go to war without UN clearance, and that the hypocrisy of Jacques Chirac was largely responsible for the collapse of international consensus over the war. His curious identification with Bush and his neoconservative allies as the most qualified to implement this humanitarian agenda, however, fails to recognize essential differences between the leftist case for war and the hard-line justification for regime change in Iraq. BOOK REVIEW VENGEANCE AND EMPIRE: THE LEFTIST CASE FOR WAR IN IRAQ WILLIAM SHAWCROSS, ALLIES: THE U.S., BRITAIN, EUROPE, AND THE WAR IN IRAQ* Hal Blanchard** INTRODUCTION In early 2002, as the war in Afghanistan came to an end and a new interim government took power in Kabul,1 Vice President Richard Cheney was discussing with President George W.
    [Show full text]
  • Geopolitics, Oil Law Reform, and Commodity Market Expectations
    OKLAHOMA LAW REVIEW VOLUME 63 WINTER 2011 NUMBER 2 GEOPOLITICS, OIL LAW REFORM, AND COMMODITY MARKET EXPECTATIONS ROBERT BEJESKY * Table of Contents I. Introduction .................................... ........... 193 II. Geopolitics and Market Equilibrium . .............. 197 III. Historical U.S. Foreign Policy in the Middle East ................ 202 IV. Enter OPEC ..................................... ......... 210 V. Oil Industry Reform Planning for Iraq . ............... 215 VI. Occupation Announcements and Economics . ........... 228 VII. Iraq’s 2007 Oil and Gas Bill . .............. 237 VIII. Oil Price Surges . ............ 249 IX. Strategic Interests in Afghanistan . ................ 265 X. Conclusion ...................................... ......... 273 I. Introduction The 1973 oil supply shock elevated OPEC to world attention and ensconced it in the general consciousness as a confederacy that is potentially * M.A. Political Science (Michigan), M.A. Applied Economics (Michigan), LL.M. International Law (Georgetown). The author has taught international law courses for Cooley Law School and the Department of Political Science at the University of Michigan, American Government and Constitutional Law courses for Alma College, and business law courses at Central Michigan University and the University of Miami. 193 194 OKLAHOMA LAW REVIEW [Vol. 63:193 antithetical to global energy needs. From 1986 until mid-1999, prices generally fluctuated within a $10 to $20 per barrel band, but alarms sounded when market prices started hovering above $30. 1 In July 2001, Senator Arlen Specter addressed the Senate regarding the need to confront OPEC and urged President Bush to file an International Court of Justice case against the organization, on the basis that perceived antitrust violations were a breach of “general principles of law.” 2 Prices dipped initially, but began a precipitous rise in mid-March 2002.
    [Show full text]
  • In Error, Immoral, Unethical, and Impossible for Me to Attend
    Severe Bipolar Clinical Depression vs. WCA: In Error, Immoral, Unethical, and Impossible For Me To Attend Supporter Morgan Freeman, in a personal capacity Your Ref. (My NI No.): WM549438D Dear DWP/Atos Staffer, On Sat 01 June 2013, I was aghast to receive a letter, signed ‘Atos Healthcare’ (sic) and dated Thu 30 May 2013, summoning me to attend what I can only assume is the infamous and discredited ‘Work Capability Assessment’ (WCA) [1] at 15:20 on Fri 14 Jun 2013 at a ‘Marylebone Medical Assessment Centre’. The letter and accompanying pamphlet both neglect to mention the actual name of the assessment I am being summoned to attend. I am currently bumping along the bottom of an episode of severe bipolar clinical depression; so it’s taking an excessively strenuous and stressful amount of mental energy, dogged perseverance, and fitful concentration to overcome the depressive symptomatic urge to just “Bin this rubbish, and face the detrimental consequences later (which is all I deserve anyway, because I’m worthless scum)”, and rather to do the right thing: to explain to the DWP/Atos why I believe this summoning to be in error, immoral, unethical, and impossible for me to attend. So although I am currently at just about my weakest and most vulnerable, and therefore least able to self-advocate in my own best interests, I shall nevertheless take some days to assemble my considered response. Since this considered response message is both thorough and extensive, you may prefer to read it on paper rather than on screen. To that end, I have attached a version formatted for printing on A4 paper: • ‘Severe Bipolar Clinical Depression vs.
    [Show full text]
  • Us Failure in Afghanistan: Half-Baked Planning Or Pakistan?
    127 US FAILURE IN AFGHANISTAN: HALF-BAKED PLANNING OR PAKISTAN? Muhammad Hashim Zafar Wadhen, Shafei Moiz Hali and Adnan Jamil* Abstract The Global War on Terrorism, launched as a direct result of the heinous 9/11 attacks, has been wagging on for almost two decades with no clear signs of victory for the US. The US on a strategic level has lost the war as the primary opponent, Taliban, holds more territory than ever. The US and NATO coalition not only planned to eradicate terrorism in the country but also had great ambitions to modernize and rebuild the country; however, little has been archived so far. Amidst these harsh realities, Pakistan being a major non-NATO ally is often blamed to sabotage the war efforts by playing a so-called double-game while supporting the Global War on Terrorism on one hand and helping the Taliban on the other. Therefore, this paper investigates the reasons for the US failure in Afghanistan on a macro-level and what role Pakistan has played. Other than the notion that Pakistan is to blame, factors, such as, the US has no real long- term objectives for the war, employing conventional methods of warfare, underestimating the opponent and the terrain, lack of coordination among the NATO member states and the sudden attention shift from Afghanistan to Iraq, played a significant role in the current outcome. After evaluating all the evidence from the last two decades, it is clear that half-baked US planning led to the eventual failure of the war effort. Keywords: GWOT, Pakistan, Taliban, NATO, Terrorism.
    [Show full text]
  • Windfall Tax Campaign Toolkit ‘A Windfall for Social and Environmental Justice’
    cDIREoCTIONmFOR THE pass DEMOCRATIC LEFT February 2009 Windfall Tax Campaign Toolkit ‘A windfall for social and environmental justice’ By Gemma Tumelty & Jenna Khalfan Windfall Tax Campaign Toolkit Introduction & Contents Rising energy and fuel prices are affecting everyone but it's the poorest and those on fixed incomes who are paying the heaviest price for the essentials of life - light and heat. This situation is unsustainable and should be challenged. Compass believes that the moment is right for the government to levy a sensible one off windfall tax on the energy and oil companies to guarantee social and environmental justice for the common good of people living today and for future generations. The government can move quickly and decisively now - but it needs to know that this is what the people want. We have developed a toolkit to help you campaign locally and nationally to have your say in this important debate. Contents 1. Briefing questions and answers 2. Key statistics 3. Campaign aims and actions 4. What you can do locally a. Get local Labour Party, Students’ Union and trade union support b. How to Lobby your MP c. Local media d. energy companies 5. Building a local coalition: pensioners groups, anti-poverty groups, church groups, fuel poverty groups, single parent networks etc Appendix 1. Who supports a windfall tax 2. Model letter to MPs 3. Model letter to the Chancellor Windfall Tax Campaign Toolkit www.compassonline.org.uk PAGE 1 1. Briefing questions agreed to raise this to a £150 million a be particularly targeted at families in or and answers year by 2010, with the rate of price rises facing fuel poverty.
    [Show full text]
  • Aftermath of the Anti-Terrorism Police Raids in Forest Gate on 2 June 2006
    Scrutiny by the Metropolitan Police Authority of communication and media at the Metropolitan Police Service with particular reference to the handling of media and communications during the Forest Gate incident of June 2006 Aftermath of the Anti-Terrorism Police Raids in Forest Gate on 2 June 2006 Submission of Newham Monitoring Project 27 September 2006 Aftermath of the Police Raids in Forest Gate on 2 June 2006 1. Terms of Reference 1.1. On Friday 2 June, 2006 police carried out raids on 46 and 48 Lansdown Road, Forest Gate, London. In the weeks following these raids the Metropolitan Police Authority (MPA) amended its existing scrutiny programme of the Metropolitan Police Service (MPS) for 2006/7 to include the media and communications strategy of the MPS. 1.2. The stated objectives of this amendment to the MPA’s scrutiny programme is to : a) Assess the extent to which the MPS has the strategies, policies, protocols and processes in place to ensure efficient and effective communication, media and reputation management, particularly in the context of the 24 hour news environment. b) Undertake a detailed analysis of the handling of the media and communication during the Forest Gate incident in June 2006. c) Assess how effectively the MPS engages internally to manage communication to the media, Londoners and stakeholders, particularly during sensitive operations. d) Understand the culture of the MPS towards communication and media management and the impact this has on the delivery of an effective service. e) Evaluate the use of resources available to the MPS to deliver this key function, including understanding the division of resources and lines of accountability between central and local directorates.
    [Show full text]
  • 2000 Annual Report Green Alliance’S Mission Is to Promote Sustainable Development by Ensuring That the Environment Is at the Heart of Decision-Making
    1999 - 2000 annual report Green Alliance’s mission is to promote sustainable development by ensuring that the environment is at the heart of decision-making. It works with senior people in government, parliament, business and the environmental movement to encourage new ideas, dialogue and constructive solutions. Green Alliance has three main aims: . to make the environment a central political issue; . to integrate the environment effectively in public policy and decision-making; . to stimulate new thinking and advance the environmental agenda into new areas. We wish to thank Severn Trent plc for their support of this year’s annual report. Green Alliance’s publications are supported by DETR’s Environmental Action Fund. chair’s report Green Alliance’s twenty-first year, and my first year as Chair, has been a dynamic and productive one. A growing budget and staff have enabled us to play an increasingly significant role in the politics and policy of the environment in the UK. Climate change continues to pose a serious environmental challenge to politicians and policy-makers alike. Green Alliance has contributed to the UK energy policy debate on a wide range of issues, from the climate change levy to utility regulation. Our key recommendations for renewable energy have been adopted by government and our proposal for a sustainable energy agency has been endorsed by the Royal Commission on Environmental Pollution. Biotechnology policy, too, has remained high on the political and public agendas. Our recommendations and leading role over many years were recognised this year with the creation of the new Agriculture and Environment Biotechnology Commission and the appointment of Julie Hill to the position of deputy chair.
    [Show full text]
  • Sir Ian Blair: Lecture on Police Reform
    Police, Lawyers and Public Service Reform Sir Ian Blair Lecture to Civitas, Monday 2 February 2004 On Friday, the Metropolitan Police Service delivered its response to the recent Home Office consultation paper, ‘Building Safer Communities’. I have to say that the document is pretty radical. What I thought I would do this evening is to run through the ways in which the police service have recently responded - and now intend again to respond to the reform of public services. I hope thereby to disprove George Bernard Shaw’s comment that, “in the end all professions are conspiracies against the laity.” I will also gently suggest that the legal profession might care to join us on that journey. This will not be an attack on lawyers but an invitation. The history of both professions, as a whole, has been largely conservative. While there have been many reforming and, indeed, radical lawyers, law develops slowly. For almost all of its history, the police service has been silent, an institution which, until the 1980s at the earliest, was an institution little affected by politics and largely separate from the impulses of reform in other parts of the public service. During the 1990s, however, and with increasing speed ever since, law enforcement, community safety, policing, call it what you will, has become a central component in the infrastructure of a modern or post modern society and thus a critical factor both in politics and in media debate. In the last round of local elections in England and Wales, this broad area of public concern was the most important issue to the focus groups of the various political parties: it is starting off as the most important issue in the London mayoral election.
    [Show full text]
  • Newsletter June 2013 Contentsadvertisement HDA Newsletter June 2013 Page
    Huntington’s Disease Association Newsletter June 2013 ContentsAdvertisement HDA Newsletter June 2013 Page Message From The Chair 3 Message from the Chief Executive 4 June 2013 Newsletter Information 5 JHD Summary 6 Major Roche-Isis deal boosts Huntington’s disease gene silencing 7 Summary of prevalence of adult HD 10 Train HD Six Monthly Report 10 Liver changes in Huntington’s disease patients suggest more ‘whole body’ research needed 11 Is a new technique set to revolutionize Huntington’s disease genetic testing? 14 Impact Award 18 John Heald, former ChairmanW elcomeand Director of theto HDA 19 Awareness Week 2013 19 Recognition is the name; e-petition is the game 21 NHS Changes - Hopes & Fearsthe 69th 23 Tracing hd – a personal story 24 Personal Independence Payment issue 25 Yoga and HD 26 Young Adult Weekend 2013 of the 28 Fundraising 29 Scroll of Honour Newsletter 46 Branch Update 52 Support Groups and Branches of the HDA 53 News from the RCA Team 65 Staff Contact Details 74 Tributes 75 Forthcoming Events 2013 83 Opinions and recommendations appearing in articles within this Newsletter may not necessarily represent those of the Association. Items which include details of accommodation and services are printed in good faith. Complaints: If you are not satisfied with the services we provide please tell us. You can either do so verbally or contact Head Office for a copy of our Complaints Procedure together with the necessary form. Confidentiality and your right to be heard will be maintained. Editorial Panel: Panel: Sally Phoenix,Cath Stanley, Cath Stanley, Bill Brenda Crowder Stevenson, and Eleni Becky Zacharius Davis Message from the Chair 2013 has started where we Bakewell, Financial Accountant and our dear left in 2012; I have been friends and supporters; Professor Sarah extremely busy working Tabrizi, Professor of Clinical Neurology and with your Executive Dr Ed Wild, Clinical Lecturer in Neurology, Council Trustees.
    [Show full text]
  • Private Actors and Security Governance
    Private Actors and Security Governance Alan Bryden, and Marina Caparini (editors.) © 2006, LIT & DCAF Contents List of Graphs and Tables ix Preface xi Abbreviations xiii Part I: Introduction 1 Approaching the Privatisation of Security from 3 a Security Governance Perspective Alan Bryden Part II: The International Policy Context 2 Fragile Statehood, Armed Non-State Actors 23 and Security Governance Ulrich Schneckener 3 Private Sector, Public Security 41 Alyson Bailes 4 Insurgencies, Security Governance and 65 the International Community Albrecht Schnabel. 5 Reconstructing the Public Monopoly 87 of Legitimate Force Herbert Wulf Part III: Regional and National Perspectives 6 Bulgaria's Private Security Industry 109 Philip Gounev 7 The Commercialisation of Post-Soviet Private Security 129 Duncan Hiscock 8 Challenges of Security Privatisation in Iraq 149 David Isenberg 9 Implementing South Africa’s Regulation of 167 Foreign Military Assistance Act Raenette Taljaard Part IV: Challenges of Regulation 10 Regulating Military and Security Services 189 in the European Union Elke Krahmann 11 The United Nations and the Dilemma 213 of Outsourcing Peacekeeping Operations Victor-Yves Ghebali 12 Assessing the Relationship between Humanitarian 231 Actors and Private Security Companies Christopher Spearin 13 Private Security Actors, Donors and SSR 247 Peter Wilson Part V: Conclusion 14 Applying a Security Governance Perspective to 263 the Privatisation of Security Marina Caparini Annex International Organisations and the Governance of 285 Private Security
    [Show full text]
  • On the Morning of January 26, Sir Ian Reported Back to His Police Authority
    City Research Online City, University of London Institutional Repository Citation: Greer, C. & McLaughlin, E. (2011). "Trial by media": Policing, the 24-7 news mediasphere and the "politics of outrage". Theoretical Criminology, 15(1), pp. 23-46. doi: 10.1177/1362480610387461 This is the unspecified version of the paper. This version of the publication may differ from the final published version. Permanent repository link: http://openaccess.city.ac.uk/1986/ Link to published version: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1362480610387461 Copyright and reuse: City Research Online aims to make research outputs of City, University of London available to a wider audience. Copyright and Moral Rights remain with the author(s) and/or copyright holders. URLs from City Research Online may be freely distributed and linked to. City Research Online: http://openaccess.city.ac.uk/ [email protected] ‘Trial by Media’: Policing, the 24-7 News Mediasphere and the ‘Politics of Outrage’ Greer, C. and McLaughlin, E. (2011) ‘Trial by Media: Policing, the 24-7 News Mediasphere, and the Politics of Outrage’, Theoretical Criminology, 15, 1: 23-46. Abstract This article analyses the changing nature of news media-police chief relations. Building on previous theoretical work (Greer and McLaughlin, 2010), we use the concepts of ‘inferential structure’ (Lang and Lang, 1955) and ‘hierarchy of credibility’ (Becker, 1967) to examine former Metropolitan Police Service (MPS) Commissioner Sir Ian Blair’s ‘trial by media’. We focus on the collective and overwhelmingly hostile journalistic reaction to Blair’s declaration in 2005 that, (a) the news media are guilty of ‘institutional racism’ in their coverage of murders, and (b) the murders of two ten- year-olds in Soham, 2001, received undue levels of media attention.
    [Show full text]
  • 5Th Draft 12 October 2009-SB Performance Script Nov 28.Fdx
    THIS MUCH IS TRUE DRAFT 5 8/10/09 Written by Paul Unwin and Sarah Beck Locked pages Based on interviews, transcripts and recorded media. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED Tim Corrie UNITED AGENTS 12 - 26 Lexington Street London W1F 0LE [email protected] A traverse stage. Apparently a very simple setting of a table and chairs, it will turn out to be something of a magic box. The walls of the theatre will be used to carry projections both of footage and imagery. To begin with there are three actors. They wear dark suits, white shirts - it could be legal, it could be funereal, most importantly is that it is professional and asexual. ACTOR ONE - MALE, white early forties. ACTOR TWO - FEMALE, white late thirties. ACTOR THREE - FEMALE, not-Caucasian late twenties. They will be joined by three Brazilians. 1 10.06 AM 22/7/05 1 House lights still up, the three actors walk in front of the audience. ACTOR ONE (MALE) At approximately six minutes past ten on the morning of 22nd of July 2005 Jean Charles de Menezes, a twenty-seven year old Brazilian, was shot dead by British Police on an Underground train waiting at Stockwell Tube. This much is true. During this, the second actor holds a transcript from the INQUEST. She begins reading: ACTOR TWO (DUNWOODIE) (reading, without emotion) It’s a really odd thing to try to describe, because my memory is that right in the carriage where we were actually we were all very still, I think because it was so unexpected..
    [Show full text]