DOCSLIB.ORG

Placing Drawings – the Detail Drawings for Reinforcing Bars In

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Placing Drawings – the Detail Drawings for Reinforcing Bars In ENGINEERING ETN-C-4-15 Placing Drawings – The Detail Drawings for Reinforcing Bars in Site-Cast Reinforced Concrete Construction Introduction Placing drawings are not used in the fabricating shop, per se. Thus, the generic term “shop” when The terminology regarding the detail drawings for applied to the detail drawings for reinforcing bars in reinforcing bars in site-cast reinforced concrete con- site-cast concrete construction is extremely inappro- struction is often misused in contract documents* priate. and is not an accurate description of the detail draw- ings. The issue of terminology is real. It is not a trivial Responsibility Issues nor a scholarly matter of semantics. Rather, the inap- propriate “labeling” of the detail drawings for rein- Responsibility for the preparation, review, and ap- forcing bars can result in: proval of placing drawings is established in the ACI detailing standard and in the ASCE quality manual. • Unnecessary added costs to the Reinforcing Bar Fabricator, which are ultimately passed on. ACI 315 Detailing Standard. The USA consensus standard for detailing reinforcing bars for site-cast re- • Issues regarding responsibility and ethics. inforced concrete construction is promulgated by the • Time delay due to drawing submission proto- American Concrete Institute: “Details and Detailing cols. of Reinforcement (ACI 315-99)”. ACI 315 clearly addresses the responsibilities of the Objective of This Report Architect/Engineer regarding placing drawings: The aim of this report is to: “The responsibility of the Architect/Engineer is to furnish a clear statement of design require- • Define and describe “placing drawings” - the ments to the Detailer. The Architect/Engineer’s detailed drawings for the reinforcing bars in site- project specifications or structural drawings cast reinforced concrete construction. must not merely refer the Detailer to an ap- • Dispel the notion that “one size fits all” in the plicable building code for information to use in descriptions of the detail drawings for construc- preparing the placing drawings. Instead, this in- tion materials and products. formation shall be interpreted by the Architect/ Engineer and shown in the form of specific de- What are Placing Drawings sign details or notes for the Detailer to follow. Where omissions, ambiguities, or incompat- Placing drawings are working drawings akin to erec- ibilities are discovered, additional information, tion or assembly type drawings, instructing the field clarifications, or corrections shall be requested Ironworker (Placer) where to place the reinforcing by the Detailer and provided by the Architect/En- bars within the formwork. Placing drawings may gineer. The Architect/Engineer should require in also indicate the bar support layout and a placing se- the project specifications that placing drawings quence, thus facilitating the efficient installation of be submitted for approval.” the reinforcing bars. Regarding the Detailer’s responsibility, ACI 315 Placing drawings are prepared by Detailers, trained Technical Note Technical states: technicians who are extremely proficient in interpret- ing the structural information shown by the contract “The responsibility of the Detailer in preparing documents. At no time does a Detailer make an engi- placing drawings is to carry out all instructions neering decision. In fact, in today’s litigious society, a on the Contract Documents. “ Detailer would be foolish to accept this responsibility. ASCE Quality Manual. ASCE’s Manual No. 73, Qual- Figure 1 shows an example of a placing drawing. ity in the Constructed Project, addresses the role of placing drawings for reinforcing steel in cast-in-place A Detailer prepares a list of the reinforcing bars that concrete construction. Chapter 17 of the manual is are shown on the placing drawings. A bar list is a list- titled Construction Contract Documentation and Sub- ing of reinforcing bars making up a bill of materials. mittals. Article 17.3.8 (Placing Drawings for Concrete The bar list contains the quantities, sizes, lengths, Reinforcing Steel) states in part: and bending dimensions of the reinforcing bars. These lists serve several purposes. The Fabricator “ ... The design professional has authority and uses a bar list for shearing and bending, tagging, responsibility for overall design of the complet- shipping, and invoicing. The Ironworker Foreman and ed structure and for the review and approval of the placing crew use a bar list for checking delivery the placing drawings for conformance with the quantities, sorting bundles of bars in the job-site lay- project design concept and the information in down area, and hoisting of proper bundles to the the construction contract documents. placing area. The constructor and subcontractors have re- Figure 2 shows an example of a bar list. sponsibility for preparing the placing drawings, providing the materials specified, and complet- ing the fabrication and construction process. This work is carried out in accordance with the construction contract documents, approved *See the Terminology section for definitions of cer- placing drawings, and accepted industry stan- tain terms used in this report. dards. the Architect/Engineer regarding the structural detailing of anchorage or embedment lengths and splices of reinforcement. In Chapter 26 of the Code, Section 26.6.1.1 states: “Design information that the licensed design professional shall specify in the construction documents: • Type, size, location requirements, detailing, and embed- ment length of reinforcement • Location and length of lap splices • Type and location of mechanical and welded splices” This point is further emphasized in Section 26.6.2.2(c), which states: Figure 1 - Example of a placing drawing “Splices in reinforcement shall be made only as permitted in the In most cases, placing drawings for reinforcing steel in cast-in- construction documents, or as authorized by the licensed design place concrete do not need design services and it is not neces- professional.” sary or appropriate for the contract documents to call for certifi- In his presentation at the October 1998 PCI Convention and Exhibi- cation by a licensed engineer. For post-tensioned, pre-stressed, tion, Norman L. Scott, an eminent Structural Engineer, included com- cast-in-place concrete structures, the design professional may ments on the issue of design responsibility. Mr. Scott was actively in- delegate certain design activities to ... “ volved with the ASCE Committee on the development of Manual 73 Design Responsibility and the ACI Board Committee that prepared “ACI Guidelines for Au- thorities and Responsibilities in Concrete Design and Construction”. Structural Detailing of Reinforcement. Proper structural detailing Regarding placing drawings, Mr. Scott stated: of reinforcement is critically important to attain the desired level of performance of reinforced concrete structures. Adequate anchorage “. The reinforcing steel fabricators who supply reinforcing bars or embedment lengths and splices of reinforcing bars are crucial. for cast-in-place concrete say they never do any design work and, therefore, it is not necessary to sign their submissions, Since the structural details of reinforcement are critically important, which they prefer to call placing drawings. The ACI responsibility it is unrealistic for the Architect/Engineer to require or expect the De- committee looked at this practice very carefully and concluded tailer to perform the structural detailing - the Detailer is not qualified that they [the reinforcing steel fabricators] are right. There are to do so. essentially no reinforcing bar suppliers who do design work; The ACI 318 Building Code properly assigns certain responsibilities to they just do the detailing. “ 2 Placing Drawings - The Detail Drawings for Reinforcing Bars in Site-Cast Reinforced Steel Construction [ETN C-4-15] 2/10/2015 09:20 AM Release Details Page: 1 of 1 Lengths in Imperial Job#: ET859933 Asby Laboratories Weights in Imperial (lb) Cust#: 584929 Duckworth Constrution Co. Release: 01000 Basement ELevator Pit Bid: 001 (HOTEL BUILDING) MTR: Yes Sac: 650 MISC., PITS Lab: N/A Code: Cust Late Order (Bill Adj: 1) Status: Fabbed Item# Type Oty Part Grade TotLgt Mark Bend A BC D E F GH KRJ O Weight Color Remarks Sep. Sep. Rmk On Rmk On Bundle? Tag? Bar List? Tag? FOUNDATIONS x x Item# Type Qty Part Grade TotLgt Mark Bend AB CD EFGH KRJO Weight 0002 Str 17 6+ A706/ 16 -10 430 0003 Str 17 6+ A706/ 16 - 9 428 0004 Str 4 8+ A706/ 16 - 0 171 0005 Str 4 8+ A706/ 17 - 9 190 0006 Str 4 8+ A706/ 19 - 9 211 0007 Str 4 8+ A706/ 22 - 3 238 0008 Str 4 8+ A706/ 25 - 0 267 0009 Str 11 5+ A706/ 16 - 6 189 0010 Str 12 6+ A706/ 15 - 6 279 0011 Str 12 6+ A706/ 16 - 6 297 1 3 3 0012 Lig 30 4+ A706/ 7 - 3 /2 4A21 26S 2 - 0 1 - 2 /4 0 - 10 1 - 2 /4 2 - 0 146 3 3 0013 Hea 44 6+ A706/ 9 - 0 /4 6A60 2 1 - 0 7 - 0 /4 1 - 0 599 1 1 1 1 1 3 0014 Hea 12 8+ A706/ 36 - 4 /2 8A34 3 1 - 4 9 - 11 /2 13 - 9 /2 9 - 11 /2 1 - 4 7 - 1 /4 6 - 11 /4 30 - 5 1165 1 3 3 3 1 3 0015 Hea 12 8+ A706/ 36 - 1 /4 8A35 3 1 - 4 9 - 11 /4 13 - 5 /4 9 - 11 /4 1 - 4 7 - 1 /2 7 - 0 30 - 1 /4 1157 0016 Hea 20 8+ A706/ 16 - 0 8A36 17 8 - 0 8 - 0 854 282 - 66 - Hash Totals -1 - 0 19 - 8 27 - 24 26 - 24 19 - 24 4 - 8 1 - 0 14 - 213 - 11 0 - 00 - 0 60 - 6 Size Total # Total Total Stock Straight Straight Heavy Heavy Heavy Light Light Light Medium Medium Spiral Spiral Thread Thread Pcs Weight Weight Pcs Weight # Pcs Weight # Pcs Weight Pcs Weight Pcs Weight Pcs Weight CRSI Technical Note Technical CRSI Rebar-Black A706/6 4/13 Bar 1 30 146 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 30 146 0 0 0 0 0 0 5/16 Bar 1 11 189 0 11 189 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6/19 Bar 5 102 2033 0 58 1434 1 44 599 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8/25 Bar 8 64 4253 0 20 1077 3 44 3176 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Size Tot: 15 207 6621 0 89 2700 4 88 3775 1 30 146 0 0 0 0 0 0 RptTot: 15 207 6621 0 89 2700 4 88 3775 1 30 146 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 Figure 2 - Example of a bar list Approval of Placing Drawings Exchanging drawings electronically, as CAD or PDF files, is a way to save time and improve the accuracy of placing drawings.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Student Catalog
    CONSTRUCTION TRAINING CENTER Main Campus: 1171 Dave Cole Road • Blair, SC 29015 • (803) 712-9343 • Fax (803) 712-9302 www.ConstructionTrainingCenter.org Licensed by the South Carolina Commission of Higher Education 1333 Main Street Suite 200 • Columbia, SC 29201 • (803) 737-2260 “Licensure indicates only that the minimum standards have been met; it is not and endorsement or guarantee of quality” (Published January, 2009) TABLE OF CONTENTS About Our School ..........................................................................................................................1 Organizational Chart ......................................................................................................................1 Advisory Board ..............................................................................................................................1 Our Mission ...................................................................................................................................2 Admission Requirements ...............................................................................................................2 Change of Student Status ..............................................................................................................3 Attendance Policy/Tardiness..........................................................................................................3 Class Schedule Hours ...................................................................................................................4 Grading
    [Show full text]
  • Ironworker Safety Performance Is TOPS in INDUSTRY
    AUGUST 2014 Ironworker Safety Performance is TOPS IN INDUSTRY California Erectors 4 In Memoriam 8 Project Safety Successes 15 20005_IWAug14.indd 1 8/6/14 5:28 AM 1750 New York Ave., N.W., Suite 400 Washington, D.C. 20006 p (202) 383-4800 www.ironworkers.org [email protected] Volume 114 | AUGUST 2014 | Number 7 INTERNATIONAL OFFICERS WALTER WISE JOE STANDLEY General President Fourth General Vice President Suite 400 1660 San Pablo Avenue, Suite C 1750 New York Avenue, NW Pinole, CA 94564 FEATURES Washington, DC 20006 p (510) 724-9277 p (202) 383-4810 f (510) 724-1345 f (202) 638-4856 4 California Erectors MARVIN RAGSDALE JOSEPH HUNT Fifth General Vice President General President Emeritus 3003 Dawn Drive 7 In Memory of Our Fallen Brothers Suite 400 Suite 104 1750 New York Avenue, NW Georgetown, TX 78628 10 Iron Worker Members Make a Difference Washington, DC 20006 p (512) 868-5596 p (202) 383-4845 f (512) 868-0823 f (202) 638-4856 Ironworkers Pursue OSHA Enforcement 13 DARRELL LABOUCAN ERIC DEAN Sixth General Vice President 15 Project Safety Successes General Secretary #8-205 Chatelain Drive Suite 400 St. Albert, Alberta T8N 5A4 1750 New York Avenue, NW Canada Washington, DC 20006 p (780) 459-3389 p (202) 383-4820 f (780) 459-3308 f (202) 347-2319 BERNARD EVERS JR. RON PIKSA Seventh General Vice President General Treasurer Suite 400 Suite 400 1750 New York Avenue, NW 1750 New York Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20006 Washington, DC 20006 p (202) 383-4851 p (202) 383-4830 f (202) 347-1496 DEPARTMENTS f (202) 383-6483 KENNETH “BILL” DEAN RICHARD WARD Eighth General Vice President Departmental Reports First General Vice President 1445 Washington Road, Suite 1100 25 5964 Dayton Boulevard Washington, PA 15301 Chattanooga, TN 37415 p (724) 229-1110 27 IMPACT p (423) 870-1982 f (724) 229-1119 f (423) 876-0774 28 Lifetime Honorary Members STEPHEN SWEENEY EDWARD J.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Construction Apprenticeship Guidebook 1 2020 Construction Apprenticeship Guidebook
    King County • Pierce County • Snohomish County 2020 Construction Apprenticeship Guidebook 1 2020 Construction Apprenticeship Guidebook View online at www.bitly.com/apprenticeshipguidebook. Produced and compiled by In partnership with www.seattle.gov/priorityhire www.soundtransit.org And with help from www.wabuildingtrades.org www.wsdot.wa.gov www.portseattle.org www.kingcounty.gov/priorityhire www.kingcounty.gov/depts/transportation/metro www.tukwilawa.gov On the cover: Terrance is a laborer apprentice and graduate of the PACT pre-apprenticeship program. Prior to working in construction, Terrance was homeless and struggled to find work. He found out about PACT from friends. Once he signed up, PACT helped him get his life back. He got his driver’s license and earned his high school diploma. Terrance now makes over $31 an hour plus benefits working for Jansen Inc., has an apartment and provides for his family; they no longer rely on welfare or food banks. Terrance’s advice to others is to go for it – you have nothing to lose! Learn more about other pathways into construction on Apprentices in Action (page 3). Updated February 2020 2 Table of Contents Introduction 1 Union Apprenticeship cont. Construction Worker Pathway 2 Drywall Finishers 28 Apprentices in Action 3 Electricians (King) 29 Apprenticeship vs. College 4 Electricians (Pierce) 30 Support Services 5 Electricians (Snohomish) 31 RPAC 7 Elevator Constructors 32 Floor Layers 33 Pre-Apprenticeship 8 Glaziers 34 ANEW 9 Heat & Frost Insulators 35 Carpenters 10 Ironworkers 36 Cement Masons
    [Show full text]
  • Fatal and Nonfatal Injuries Within Construction Occupations
    THE CONSTRUCTION CHART BOOK 42 Fatal and Nonfatal Injuries within Construction Occupations Death and injury counts vary widely among construction occupa- at age 20 and a number of construction workers are still working tions. From 2008 to 2010,1 the number of work-related deaths at age 65), it is estimated that the probability of a fatality is among construction laborers (630) far exceeded the number of approximately 0.5% (5.1 per 1,000 FTEs).3 Ironworkers (31.1 per fatalities in other construction occupations, accounting for 23% 1,000 FTEs), electrical power-line installers (26.1 per 1,000 of all construction fatalities during that time (chart 42a). Foremen FTEs), and roofers (14.2 per 1,000 FTEs) have a higher lifetime experienced 278 deaths during the same period, ranking as the risk of fatal work injuries than any other construction occupa- second occupation with a high fatality number in construction. tions. For comparison, the Occupational Safety and Health Construction laborers also had the highest number of nonfatal Administration considers a lifetime risk of one death in 1,000 injuries and illnesses2 resulting in days away from work (DAFW) workers to be a significant level of risk.4 in 2010, at 14,700 cases, almost twice as many as carpenters (the For nonfatal work injuries, about 65% of construction next highest occupation) with 8,300 cases (chart 42b). workers may experience DAFW injuries during their working In terms of injury rates, electrical power-line installers lifetime. When broken down by occupation, construction helpers, had the highest rate of fatal injuries (56.5 per 100,000 full-time sheet metal workers, and ironworkers have the greatest lifetime equivalent workers [FTEs, see Glossary]), which was nearly six risk at 90% or more (chart 42f).
    [Show full text]
  • Worker Crushed by a Crate of Glass at a Residential Construction Site Case Report: 06NY001
    STATE OF NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH FATALITY ASSESSMENT AND CONTROL EVALUATION Worker Crushed by a Crate of Glass at a Residential Construction Site Case Report: 06NY001 SUMMARY On January 9, 2006, a 60 year-old male ironworker employed by an ornamental metal working company sustained fatal injuries when a crate of glass panes fell on him at a residential construction site. On the day of the incident, the company was contracted to install curtain walls (large double- paned thermal insulated glass) at the residence. Prior to installation, the workers staged the crates containing multiple plates of glass in such a way that when the crates were opened, the plates of glass would not fall out and the top glass sheet could be easily retrieved. The workers stood the crates on their sides, tilted them to a slight angle and supported the crates with either wooden bars (legs) or another crate of similar size and weight. When crates are staged in pairs, they form an upright triangle or “A” frame with the tops of the two crates touching and supporting each other. The incident happened while the workers were staging two crates (A and B) into an “A” frame. Crate A weighed approximately 1,859 pounds (Lbs.) and Crate B weighed approximately 1,943 Lbs. At the time of the incident, the foreman was standing at the north end of the two crates and a co-worker was at the south end. The victim was at the west side of the crates facing Crate B. The foreman directed the workers to push and tilt the crates towards each other.
    [Show full text]
  • Ironworker Safety
    AUGUST 2013 PRIORITY NUMBER 1: IRONWORKER SAFETY Bennett Steel Sets Safety Goal 4 In Memory of Our Fallen Brothers 8 Ironworkers on the Health Side 10 Iron Worker Members Make a Difference 15 15328_IWAug13.indd 1 8/13/13 6:17 AM 1750 New York Ave., N.W., Suite 400 Washington, D.C. 20006 p (202) 383-4800 www.ironworkers.org [email protected] INTERNATIONAL OFFICERS Volume 113 | AUGUST 2013 | Number 7 WTEAL R WISE JAY HURLEY General President Third General Vice President Suite 400 191 Old Colony Avenue, 1750 New York Avenue, NW P.O. Box 96 Washington, DC 20006 S. Boston, MA 02127 p (202) 383-4810 p (617) 268-2382 f (202) 638-4856 f (617) 268-1394 FE E ATUR S JOSEPH HUNT JOE STANDLEY General President Emeritus Fourth General Vice President 4 Bennett Steel Sets Safety Goal Suite 400 1660 San Pablo Avenue, Suite C 1750 New York Avenue, NW Pinole, CA 94564 Washington, DC 20006 p (510) 724-9277 7 In Memory of Our Fallen Brothers p (202) 383-4845 f (510) 724-1345 f (202) 638-4856 10 Ironworkers on the Health Side MARVIN RAGSDALE ERIC DEAN Fifth General Vice President General Secretary 3003 Dawn Drive 12 Iron Workers Pursue Safe and Consistent OSHA Standards Suite 400 Suite 104 1750 New York Avenue, NW Georgetown, TX 78628 Washington, DC 20006 p (512) 868-5596 15 Iron Worker Members Make a Difference p (202) 383-4820 f (512) 868-0823 f (202) 347-2319 19 Commitment to Safety DARRELL LABOUCAN EDWARD C. MCHUGH Sixth General Vice President General Treasurer #8-205 Chatelain Drive 20 TAUC Craftsperson of the Year Suite 400 St.
    [Show full text]
  • 2015 Ironworker
    National Occupational Analysis Ironworker (Generalist) 2015 Occupational Analyses Series Ironworker (Generalist) 2015 Trades and Apprenticeship Division Division des métiers et de l’apprentissage Workplace Partnerships Directorate Direction des partenariats en milieu de travail National Occupational Classification: 7264 Disponible en français sous le titre : Monteur/monteuse de charpentes en acier (généraliste) You can download this publication by going online: publicentre.esdc.gc.ca This document is available on demand in multiple formats by contacting 1 800 O-Canada (1-800-622-6232), teletypewriter (TTY), 1-800-926-9105. © Her Majesty the Queen in right of Canada, 2015 [email protected] PDF Cat. No.: Em15-1/16-2015E-PDF ISBN: 978-0-660-02902-3 ESDC Cat. No. : LM-307-07-15 _________________________________________________________________ You can download this publication and find more information on Red Seal trades by going online: http://www.red-seal.ca FOREWORD The Canadian Council of Directors of Apprenticeship (CCDA) recognizes this National Occupational Analysis as the national standard for the occupation of ironworker (generalist). Background The first National Conference on Apprenticeship in Trades and Industries, held in Ottawa in 1952, recommended that the federal government be requested to cooperate with provincial and territorial apprenticeship committees and officials in preparing analyses of a number of skilled occupations. To this end, Employment and Social Development Canada (ESDC) sponsors a program,
    [Show full text]
  • Prevailing Wage Rates System Annual Adjusted July 1St Rates
    Details of Prevailing Wage Rates by Town Page 1 of7 Prevailing Wage Rates System Annual Adjusted July 1st Rates I>.9L WeJLSite 0 Wag!Lal1.d_W-9rkpJ~ce-.issuJ!_~0 Wage Rate~ 0 Building Rates - Hartford Building Rates - Hartford (effective July 1, 2009) Classification Hourly Rate Benefits 1a) Asbestos Worker/Insulator (Includes application of insulating materials, protective coverings, coatings, & finishes to all types of mechanical systems; application of firestopping material for wall openings & $34.21 19.81 penetrations in walls, floors, ceilings - Last updated 9/1/08 1b) AsbestosjToxic Waste Removal Laborers: Asbestos removal and encapsulation (except its removal from mechanical systems which are not to be scrapped), toxic waste removers, blasters. **See Laborers Group 7** 2) Boilermaker $33.79 34%19.48+16.9819.1214.788.96+ a 3a) Bricklayer, Cement Mason, Concrete Finisher (including caulking), Plasterers, Stone Masons$30.91$24.90$30.78$32.10 3b) Tile Setter 3c) Terrazzo Workers, Marble Setters - Last updated 10/1/08 3d) Tile, Marble & Terrazzo Finishers http://www2.ctdo1.state.ct.us/W ageRates Web/W ageRatesbyTown.aspx?Town= Hartford 10/13/2009 Details of Prevailing Wage Rates by Town Page 2 ot7 3e) Plasterer $32.10 19.48 ------LABORERS------ 4) Group 1: Laborers (common or general), carpenter tenders, wrecking laborers, fire watchers. $24.25 14.45 4a) Group 2: Mortar mixers, plaster tender, power buggy operators, powdermen, $24.50 14.45 fireproofer/mixer/nozzleman, fence erector. 4b) Group 3: Jackhammer operators, mason tender (brick)
    [Show full text]
  • Ironworker Instructors Program Catalog
    WASHTENAW COMMUNITY COLLEGE • UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN IRONWORKER INSTRUCTORS TRAINING PROGRAM PROGRAM CATALOG JULY 2020 INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF BRIDGE, STRUCTURAL, ORNAMENTAL AND REINFORCING IRON WORKERS 63384_IWUF_Catalog_2020_Cover_X.indd 1 2/28/20 11:09 AM JULY 2020 PROGRAM CATALOG A MESSAGE FROM GENERAL PRESIDENT ERIC DEAN AND TSI/EXTERIOR WALL SYSTEMS BOARD CHAIRMAN VICTOR CORNELLIER n behalf of the National Training Fund Trustees, we would like to welcome you to the 36th Annual Ironworker Instructor Training Program in Ann Arbor, O Michigan. Each year we work to improve and strengthen what is already con- sidered to be the best Instructor Training Program in the industry, and 2020 will be no exception. The purpose of this annual training program is to strengthen the apprenticeship training Eric Dean and journeyman upgrading programs at every local by improving the knowledge and skills of our instructors, apprenticeship coordinators, business managers and contractors. Each year the National Training Fund and IMPACT work proactively to improve exist- ing courses and develop new courses to ensure that we are ready to meet continuously evolving construction standards, technology and methods. We also offer courses in pro- fessional development and soft skills to help develop well rounded industry professionals. The ironworkers have a reputation as being the best trained and skilled workforce in the construction industry. Our esteemed training program is the very foundation on which that reputation has been built. It is what allows us to develop the best iron- workers and most competitive contractors. The result is providing the owners and the industry with the safest, most productive and efficient ironworkers and contractors available anywhere.
    [Show full text]
  • Transcript of Proceedings in the Court of Appeals Of
    1 1 COURT OF APPEALS 2 STATE OF NEW YORK 3 ---------------------------------------- INTERNATIONAL UNION OF PAINTERS & 4 ALLIED TRADES, ET AL., 5 Respondents, 6 -against- NO. 101 7 NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, ET AL., 8 Appellants. 9 ---------------------------------------- 10 20 Eagle Street Albany, New York 11 September 12, 2018 Before: 12 CHIEF JUDGE JANET DIFIORE 13 ASSOCIATE JUDGE JENNY RIVERA ASSOCIATE JUDGE LESLIE E. STEIN 14 ASSOCIATE JUDGE EUGENE M. FAHEY ASSOCIATE JUDGE MICHAEL J. GARCIA 15 ASSOCIATE JUDGE ROWAN D. WILSON ASSOCIATE JUDGE PAUL FEINMAN 16 17 Appearances: 18 OWEN W. DEMUTH, ASG NEW YORK STATE ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE 19 Attorney for Appellants The Capitol 20 Albany, NY 12224 21 JOSEPH L. GUZA, ESQ. LIPSITZ GREEN SCIME CAMBRIA, LLP 22 Attorney for Respondents 42 Delaware Avenue, Suite 120 23 Buffalo, NY 14202 24 Karen Schiffmiller 25 Official Court Transcriber 2 1 CHIEF JUDGE DIFIORE: The next appeal is appeal 2 number 101, International Union of Painters & Allied Trades 3 against New York State Department of Labor. 4 Good afternoon, counsel. 5 MR. DEMUTH: Good afternoon, Your Honors. May it 6 please the court, my name's Owen Demuth on behalf of the 7 appellant, Department of Labor. 8 May I please reserve three minutes for rebuttal? 9 CHIEF JUDGE DIFIORE: You may, sir. 10 MR. DEMUTH: Thank you very much. 11 Your Honors, this case is about the prevailing 12 wage law and the Department's statutory mandate, as the 13 steward of that law, to do two things. 14 JUDGE STEIN: Counsel, as - - - as a steward of 15 that law, the language, as I understand it from 220 - - - 16 MR.
    [Show full text]
  • Level 3 Ironworker: Generalist
    Ironworker (Generalist) The latest version of this document is available in PDF format on the ITA website www.itabc.ca To order printed copies of Program Outlines or learning resources (where available) for BC trades contact: Crown Publications, Queen’s Printer Web: www.crownpub.bc.ca Email: [email protected] Toll Free 1 800 663-6105 Copyright © 2016 Industry Training Authority This publication may not be modified in any way without permission of the Industry Training Authority Ironworker (Generalist) Industry Training Authority 1 04/16 IRONWORKER (GENERALIST) PROGRAM OUTLINE APPROVED BY INDUSTRY DECEMBER 2012 BASED ON NOA 2010 Developed by Industry Training Authority Province of British Columbia Ironworker (Generalist) Industry Training Authority 1 04/16 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section 1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................ 3 Foreword ........................................................................................................................... 4 How to Use this Document ................................................................................................ 6 Section 2 PROGRAM OVERVIEW .................................................................................................... 8 Program Credentialing Model ........................................................................................... 9 Occupational Analysis Chart ........................................................................................... 11 Training
    [Show full text]
  • 420A Levels 1, 2 and 3 Ironworker- Structural and Ornamental
    Apprenticeship Curriculum Standard Ironworker- Structural and Ornamental Levels 1, 2 and 3 Trade Code: 420A Development Date: 2014 IRONWORKER-STRUCTURAL AND ORNAMENTAL Please Note: Apprenticeship Training and Curriculum Standards were developed by the Ministry of Training, Colleges and Universities (MTCU). As of April 8th, 2013, the Ontario College of Trades (College) has become responsible for the development and maintenance of these standards. The College is carrying over existing standards without any changes. However, because the Apprenticeship Training and Curriculum Standards documents were developed under either the Trades Qualification and Apprenticeship Act (TQAA) or the Apprenticeship and Certification Act, 1998 (ACA), the definitions contained in these documents may no longer be accurate and may not be reflective of the Ontario College of Trades and Apprenticeship Act, 2009 (OCTAA) as the new trades legislation in the province. The College will update these definitions in the future. Meanwhile, please refer to the College’s website (www.collegeoftrades.ca) for the most accurate and up-to-date information about the College. For information on OCTAA and its regulations, please visit: www.collegeoftrades.ca/about/legislation-and-regulations. © Ontario College of Trades IRONWORKER-STRUCTURAL AND ORNAMENTAL TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 1 LEVEL 1 ...........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]