DOCSLIB.ORG

Vertigogo by Christina Harlin, Your Fearless Young Orphan Stolen

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Vertigogo by Christina Harlin, Your Fearless Young Orphan Stolen Vertigogo By Christina Harlin, your Fearless Young Orphan Stolen Face (1952) Directed by Terence Fisher Aw damnit, it seems like these last few weeks we’ve had nothing but “almosts” in the Noir Scoire, film after film that came close to being great noir but then making some huge misstep in tone or focus that screws them out of a decent score. Now here we go again with Stolen Face, which comes awfully close to being a sick little precursor to Alfred Hitchcock’s Vertigo: the tale of a man molding a woman to be the thing he wants. That man would be Dr. Philip Ritter (Paul Henreid), a plastic surgeon who has dedicated himself to a noble cause. He performs corrective surgeries on criminals with the idea that, given a more attractive face, people do better in the world and do not need to resort to crime. It might sound a bit fey or even oversimplified, but it’s actually a well-documented and supported idea, and has been put to good use in reality. This is a human truth for which we are hardwired: we react better to prettier people. Oh sure, we can overcome this prejudice and we do, but that’s not really the point here. Generally, a facial deformity can make life very difficult. So Ritter’s work is not some silly old-style movie nonsense. What might be nonsense is the drastic perfection of his technique, which can turn a badly scarred woman into a dead ringer for Lizabeth Scott. I’m not sure that’s possible, ever, anywhere, but hey. We have to allow for a bit of dramatic license. The problem arises when Ritter takes a much-needed vacation and meets beautiful concert pianist Alice Brent (Scott) at the lodge where he is staying. They have a whirlwind romance and fall madly in love with each other, but the entire time she insists that their relationship cannot last beyond the vacation, and once she leaves to go on tour, it is over between them. There’s a good reason for this: she’s already engaged to someone else. She neglects to mention that to Ritter until it’s rather too late. Would have been decent of her to mention it right off the bat, you know. Like, “Hi, I’m Alice, and I’m already engaged, so make with the pervert face if you like, but this is going to be a fling and nothing more.” Anyway Ritter returns to his job all heartbroken, pretty certain that he’s not going to get over his concert pianist whom he’s known for like maybe two weeks, though I’ll grant you that Lizabeth Scott is hot enough to inspire a certain level of obsession. So Ritter does what any lunatic would do. He makes his own Alice. Lily Conover, a young woman who was badly scarred in the London bombings of WWII, is in prison for various petty crimes. Ritter agreed to operate on her face before he went on vacation. Now he’s back and he thinks, “Well what the heck, here’s a blank canvas, let’s go for it.” Over the course of several surgeries he turns her into Lizabeth Scott. Nice. Guy could make a fortune, turning people into other people. And as if that’s not enough, he also offers to marry Lily and show her how to live like a real lady. He dresses her like Alice, and gets her hair done like Alice’s hair, and then assumes that life is going to continue with his ready-made Alice. Of course he’s an idiot, and it serves him right. Lily is not much interested in being Alice. She’s more interested in having fun with her husband’s money and her gorgeous new face, which she likes to take out on a spin every night. Soon she has most of her old criminal-element friends hanging out at Ritter’s mansion. She’s shoplifting jewelry and furs. She’s not interested in the opera, she wants to go to jazz clubs. Or, in other words, she’s being herself and has no desire to be someone else just because Ritter is an obsessive jackass. The misstep this movie takes is in making Lily the villain. Are we honestly supposed to feel sorry for Ritter? Apparently so. I was truly hoping that he’d get his comeuppance in a big bad way. I thought it might happen when the real Alice Brent, winding up her European tour, breaks things off with her fiancé and goes running back to Ritter. What should happen is that Alice gets one look at Lily and says, “O-kay, that’s about ten times more crazy than I care to entertain,” and then walks right back out the door. But no. No, somebody putting this story together decided that Alice should be more like, “Oh poor Ritter, he must have really loved me, and now look at what this awful woman is doing to him.” Then she and Paul set about trying to extricate him from his sham of a marriage. Lily isn’t interested in freeing him (I don’t know why not, imagine the settlement she could get!). The missteps made so far could be corrected with a really gnarly, heartless plot about Alice and Ritter trying to murder Lily or replace Lily with Alice or something, but again, no. Don’t hold your breath. The plot will instead be tied up in a too- convenient, cheap and ridiculous finale that spoils everything. Lucky for the loving couple, Lily is a sloppy drunk and I guess the police just aren’t even going to ask questions about how she managed to stumble out of a moving train to her Paul Henried stars as Kevin Spacey in this year’s feel-good death. I could easily see film, Kevin Spacey, Plastic Surgeon. this movie called a thriller or even a horror movie with a bit of tweaking, yet its components don’t even add up that much. Maybe the creators simply didn’t have time to flesh out the story, or they couldn’t pick a genre. Let’s see what the Noir Scoire has in store for this oddity: Our anti-hero: Philip Ritter, plastic surgeon and obsessed stalker. His is a role more suited for a horror movie, when you think about it. A plastic surgeon who turns a woman into the girl of his dreams? That’s thriller material, but it could work for film noir in the right hands. These are the wrong hands. Philip Ritter doesn’t have the requisite fatal flaw of a good noir anti-hero because he’s a stuck- up lunatic who has some serious damn issues with women, and what’s worse, he never really learns his lesson. 4/10 As Played by: Paul Henreid, and it’s not his fault that this is a crap character. The performance itself is really not the issue but the script. I figure Henreid was doing about the best he could, and even though nobody comes out and say, “You f***ed up, asshole,” to the deluded Ritter, Henreid at least has the guy looking ashamed of himself for being a tool. 8/10 The femme fatale: Well, I guess the femme fatale is meant to be Lily, the woman who is turned into the Alice Brent lookalike. Lily is supposed to be a small-time convict who takes advantage of the doctor who made her beautiful and married her to boot. We, however, think this is a pantload of hooey. Lily is being held to a standard of which she’s not even aware, and is the victim of a very strange man. I felt sorrier for her character than anyone else in the film, unless it was poor stupid Alice, who pretends like she’s okay with the whole mess. 6/10 As played by: Lizabeth Scott. I don’t know if I entirely believe the Cockney accent, but it’s better than I expected. Scott is one of my favorite actresses and I have trouble faulting her for anything. Like Henreid, she’s just playing a confusing character(s). If nothing else, she’s always a pleasure to watch. 8/10 The villain: It’s supposed to be Lily. It’s not Lily. It’s Ritter. He’s the sick twist who tried to make himself a wife from scratch. Alfred Hitchcock made this plot into one of the most highly-regarded films in the world, but in this case, nobody seems willing to admit that Ritter is the one who needs help. He’s not held responsible for his actions and he is not punished. He is the villain but the movie doesn’t seem aware of that fact, and we’re going to have to take off some points for that. 7/10 As played by: Paul Henreid, still probably baffled as to what the hell is his character’s deal. Anyway we’re going to give him the same points as before. 8/10 The crime: There is no heinous crime per se, just a lot of bad decisions and morally questionable acts. Lily is a career criminal who engages in small-time crap like shoplifting and public displays of fun. Ritter is a doctor who abuses his power and does the mashed-potato all over his ethics when he turns Lily into the spitting image of the woman he really wants. 7/10 The location: The location doesn’t help us either.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Le Studio Hammer, Laboratoire De L'horreur Moderne
    Miranda Revue pluridisciplinaire du monde anglophone / Multidisciplinary peer-reviewed journal on the English- speaking world 12 | 2016 Mapping gender. Old images ; new figures Conference Report: Le studio Hammer, laboratoire de l’horreur moderne Paris, (France), June 12-14, 2016 Conference organized by Mélanie Boissonneau, Gilles Menegaldo and Anne-Marie Paquet-Deyris David Roche Electronic version URL: http://journals.openedition.org/miranda/8195 DOI: 10.4000/miranda.8195 ISSN: 2108-6559 Publisher Université Toulouse - Jean Jaurès Electronic reference David Roche, “Conference Report: Le studio Hammer, laboratoire de l’horreur moderne ”, Miranda [Online], 12 | 2016, Online since 29 February 2016, connection on 16 February 2021. URL: http:// journals.openedition.org/miranda/8195 ; DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/miranda.8195 This text was automatically generated on 16 February 2021. Miranda is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. Conference Report: Le studio Hammer, laboratoire de l’horreur moderne 1 Conference Report: Le studio Hammer, laboratoire de l’horreur moderne Paris, (France), June 12-14, 2016 Conference organized by Mélanie Boissonneau, Gilles Menegaldo and Anne-Marie Paquet-Deyris David Roche 1 This exciting conference1 was the first entirely devoted to the British exploitation film studio in France. Though the studio had existed since the mid-1940s (after a few productions in the mid-1930s), it gained notoriety in the mid-1950s with a series of readaptations of classic
    [Show full text]
  • Shail, Robert, British Film Directors
    BRITISH FILM DIRECTORS INTERNATIONAL FILM DIRECTOrs Series Editor: Robert Shail This series of reference guides covers the key film directors of a particular nation or continent. Each volume introduces the work of 100 contemporary and historically important figures, with entries arranged in alphabetical order as an A–Z. The Introduction to each volume sets out the existing context in relation to the study of the national cinema in question, and the place of the film director within the given production/cultural context. Each entry includes both a select bibliography and a complete filmography, and an index of film titles is provided for easy cross-referencing. BRITISH FILM DIRECTORS A CRITI Robert Shail British national cinema has produced an exceptional track record of innovative, ca creative and internationally recognised filmmakers, amongst them Alfred Hitchcock, Michael Powell and David Lean. This tradition continues today with L GUIDE the work of directors as diverse as Neil Jordan, Stephen Frears, Mike Leigh and Ken Loach. This concise, authoritative volume analyses critically the work of 100 British directors, from the innovators of the silent period to contemporary auteurs. An introduction places the individual entries in context and examines the role and status of the director within British film production. Balancing academic rigour ROBE with accessibility, British Film Directors provides an indispensable reference source for film students at all levels, as well as for the general cinema enthusiast. R Key Features T SHAIL • A complete list of each director’s British feature films • Suggested further reading on each filmmaker • A comprehensive career overview, including biographical information and an assessment of the director’s current critical standing Robert Shail is a Lecturer in Film Studies at the University of Wales Lampeter.
    [Show full text]
  • Unseen Horrors: the Unmade Films of Hammer
    Unseen Horrors: The Unmade Films of Hammer Thesis submitted by Kieran Foster In partial fulfilment of the requirements for the award of Doctor of Philosophy De Montfort University, March 2019 Abstract This doctoral thesis is an industrial study of Hammer Film Productions, focusing specifically on the period of 1955-2000, and foregrounding the company’s unmade projects as primary case studies throughout. It represents a significant academic intervention by being the first sustained industry study to primarily utilise unmade projects. The study uses these projects to examine the evolving production strategies of Hammer throughout this period, and to demonstrate the methodological benefits of utilising unmade case studies in production histories. Chapter 1 introduces the study, and sets out the scope, context and structure of the work. Chapter 2 reviews the relevant literature, considering unmade films relation to studies in adaptation, screenwriting, directing and producing, as well as existing works on Hammer Films. Chapter 3 begins the chronological study of Hammer, with the company attempting to capitalise on recent successes in the mid-1950s with three ambitious projects that ultimately failed to make it into production – Milton Subotsky’s Frankenstein, the would-be television series Tales of Frankenstein and Richard Matheson’s The Night Creatures. Chapter 4 examines Hammer’s attempt to revitalise one of its most reliable franchises – Dracula, in response to declining American interest in the company. Notably, with a project entitled Kali Devil Bride of Dracula. Chapter 5 examines the unmade project Nessie, and how it demonstrates Hammer’s shift in production strategy in the late 1970s, as it moved away from a reliance on American finance and towards a more internationalised, piece-meal approach to funding.
    [Show full text]
  • “Frankenstein Created Woman” (1966) by Dr
    Short Review: “Frankenstein Created Woman” (1966) by Dr. John L. Flynn Frankenstein Created Woman (1966). Hammer Films/Great Britain, 86 min. Director: Terence Fisher. Producer: Anthony Nelson Keyes. Screenwriter: John Elder (Anthony Hinds). Cast: Peter Cushing, Susan Denberg, Thorley Walters, Robert Morris, Duncan Lamont, Peter Blythe, Alan McNaughton, Peter Madden, and Derek Fowlds. Baron Frankenstein (Cushing) and his monster were resurrected by Hammer for a fourth time in this installment that finds the mad doctor determined to endow his new creation with a soul. When a young man (Morris) wrongly accused of murder is sent to the guillotine, and his crippled lover, Christina (Playboy centerfold Denberg), grief-stricken with his death, drowns herself in the river, Frankenstein fuses the young man's soul with the woman’s shapely, bikini-clad body. But before he can share his research with the world, the Creature sets off to avenge the two young people's deaths. With the body of a woman and the soul of a man, the monster first seduces, then gruesomely kills those responsible. In the end, faced with tremendous guilt, the Creature throws itself into the river, while Frankenstein watches helplessly, unable to save it from drowning. Sexy and very erotic, this was one of Hammer Films most successful later projects. Denberg is stunning as the Baron’s new creation, and well worth the price of admission. The film was followed three years later by “Frankenstein Must Be Destroyed!” Copyright 2014 by John L. Flynn, Ph.D. .
    [Show full text]
  • A Groundbreaking International Survey of Forty Vampire Films Marks the Centenary of Bram Stoker's Dracula
    The Museum of Modern Art For Immediate Release March 1997 Contact: Graham Leggat 212/708-9752 A GROUNDBREAKING INTERNATIONAL SURVEY OF FORTY VAMPIRE FILMS MARKS THE CENTENARY OF BRAM STOKER'S DRACULA International Series Features Classic, Rare, and Offbeat Variations on Vampire Mythologies CinemaDracula April 17-May 20, 1997 The Roy and Niuta Titus Theater 1 The vampire is a seminal icon around the world, present in one form or another in nearly every culture's folklore, literature, and, during the last one hundred years, film. On the occasion of the centenary of Bram Stoker's influential novel Dracula, whose dark Count has dominated our century, The Museum of Modern Art will present CinemaDracula, an international survey of forty films that draw on the novel and other vampire stories. The series, which opens April 17, features films from 14 different countries and is the most comprehensive retrospective of vampire films ever assembled. It concludes May 20. At the heart of CinemaDracula are three classics of the horror genre that are also regarded as masterpieces of cinema: F. W. Murnau's Nosferatu: Eine Symphonie des Grauens (1922), Carl Th. Dreyer's Vampyr (1932), and Terence Fisher's Horror of Dracula (1958). The retrospective will present rare 35mm screenings of these films, including the New York premiere of the most complete extant version of Nosferatu, preserved with original color tints, on loan from the Munich Filmmuseum. 11 West 53 Street, New York, New York 10019 Tel: 212-708-9400 Fax: 212-708-9889 The series will also honor other unforgettable screen Draculas: Bela Lugosi, as the seductive continental in Tod Browning's 1931 Dracula; Klaus Kinski, in Werner Herzog's 1979 remake of Nosferatu; Frank Langella, in John Badham's 1979 adaptation of the Broadway play; and Gary Oldman, in Francis Ford Coppola's baroque 1992 interpretation.
    [Show full text]
  • TPTV Schedule August 16Th to August 22Nd Date Time Programme Synopsis Mon 16 00:20 the Great Gatsby 1974
    th nd TPTV Schedule August 16 to August 22 Date Time Programme Synopsis Mon 16 00:20 The Great Gatsby 1974. Drama. Director: Jack Clayton. Stars: Robert Redford, Mia Farrow & Sam Aug Waterston. Jay Gatsby loved spoiled, beautiful, Daisy Buchanan but lost her. Based on F. Scott Fitzgerald's novel. (SUBTITLES AVAILABLE) Mon 16 03:10 The Upturned Glass 1946. Thriller. Director: Lawrence Huntington. Stars: James Mason, Rosamund John, Aug Pamela Kellino. A leading brain surgeon believes himself responsible for the death of the woman he loves. (SUBTITLES AVAILABLE) Mon 16 04:55 Action Stations 1957. Drama. Directed by Cecil H. Williamson and starring Paul Carpenter and Mary Aug Martin. A forger flees to Spain but his daughter is kidnapped by a gang. Mon 16 06:00 The Second Mr. 1940. Comedy. Directed by John Paddy Carstairs. Stars Wallace Evennett, Evelyn Roberts Aug Bush & Kay Walsh. A writer poses as a shy butterfly hunter who has a fortune and is hounded by reporters. Mon 16 07:05 IWM: Worker's 1943. Documentary recording the efforts of workers to build a Wellington Bomber in 30 Aug Weekend (1943) hours, Second World War, directed by Ray Elton. Mon 16 07:25 Funny Face 1957. Musical Romance. Directed by Stanley Donen. Stars: Audrey Hepburn, Fred Astaire Aug & Kay Thompson. A fashion photographer asks a girl to model for him after accidentally catching her on film. (SUBTITLES AVAILABLE) Mon 16 09:30 William Tell Voice in The Night. 1958. Stars: Conrad Phillips, Willoughby Goddard & Jennifer Jayne. Aug After a disagreement with Gessler, Judge Furst is thrown into a dungeon.
    [Show full text]
  • Film Noir Database
    www.kingofthepeds.com © P.S. Marshall (2021) Film Noir Database This database has been created by author, P.S. Marshall, who has watched every single one of the movies below. The latest update of the database will be available on my website: www.kingofthepeds.com The following abbreviations are added after the titles and year of some movies: AFN – Alternative/Associated to/Noirish Film Noir BFN – British Film Noir COL – Film Noir in colour FFN – French Film Noir NN – Neo Noir PFN – Polish Film Noir www.kingofthepeds.com © P.S. Marshall (2021) TITLE DIRECTOR Actor 1 Actor 2 Actor 3 Actor 4 13 East Street (1952) AFN ROBERT S. BAKER Patrick Holt, Sandra Dorne Sonia Holm Robert Ayres 13 Rue Madeleine (1947) HENRY HATHAWAY James Cagney Annabella Richard Conte Frank Latimore 36 Hours (1953) BFN MONTGOMERY TULLY Dan Duryea Elsie Albiin Gudrun Ure Eric Pohlmann 5 Against the House (1955) PHIL KARLSON Guy Madison Kim Novak Brian Keith Alvy Moore 5 Steps to Danger (1957) HENRY S. KESLER Ruth Ronan Sterling Hayden Werner Kemperer Richard Gaines 711 Ocean Drive (1950) JOSEPH M. NEWMAN Edmond O'Brien Joanne Dru Otto Kruger Barry Kelley 99 River Street (1953) PHIL KARLSON John Payne Evelyn Keyes Brad Dexter Frank Faylen A Blueprint for Murder (1953) ANDREW L. STONE Joseph Cotten Jean Peters Gary Merrill Catherine McLeod A Bullet for Joey (1955) LEWIS ALLEN Edward G. Robinson George Raft Audrey Totter George Dolenz A Bullet is Waiting (1954) COL JOHN FARROW Rory Calhoun Jean Simmons Stephen McNally Brian Aherne A Cry in the Night (1956) FRANK TUTTLE Edmond O'Brien Brian Donlevy Natalie Wood Raymond Burr A Dangerous Profession (1949) TED TETZLAFF George Raft Ella Raines Pat O'Brien Bill Williams A Double Life (1947) GEORGE CUKOR Ronald Colman Edmond O'Brien Signe Hasso Shelley Winters A Kiss Before Dying (1956) COL GERD OSWALD Robert Wagner Jeffrey Hunter Virginia Leith Joanne Woodward A Lady Without Passport (1950) JOSEPH H.
    [Show full text]
  • Fisher and Genre (3): the Science Fiction Films
    Terence Fisher and British Science Fiction Cinema Science fiction has historically been one of the least discussed genres in British film culture. Until the publication in 1999 of a collection of essays edited by I.Q.Hunter1, serious consideration of Britain‟s contribution to the genre had frequently taken place in the margins of studies devoted mainly to the more obvious attractions of its American cousin. Few film scholars seemed willing to disagree with John Baxter‟s summation, made in 1970, that, with the exception of 2001: A Space Odyssey (1968), which in any case was directed by an American, „the great British sf film has yet to be made.‟ (Baxter: 101). Hunter himself introduces his collection by conceding that „the critical consensus remains, then, that British sf is a poor thing, responsive at periods to national discourses, but more often a shadow of its more ambitious, confident, expensive and expansive American counterpart.‟ (Hunter: 6). A similar view seems to have prevailed in relation to the science fiction films made at intervals throughout his career by Hammer‟s leading director, Terence Fisher. Despite Winston Wheeler Dixon‟s assertion that Four Sided Triangle (1952) „far outdistances such conventional and overblown 1950s genre films as The Day the Earth Stood Still (1951) and Forbidden Planet (1956)‟ (Dixon: 4), Fisher‟s work in the genre has received scant attention, even from Dixon himself, and has been consistently overshadowed by Fisher‟s better known Gothic horrors such as his series of Dracula films. This essay sets out to redress the balance by looking at the five science fiction films Fisher made during the 1950s and 1960s and at the significant part they played in the creation and development of an indigenous science fiction tradition within British film culture.
    [Show full text]
  • STOLEN FACE / 1952 (A Máscara Do Desejo)
    CINEMATECA PORTUGUESA–MUSEU DO CINEMA DUPLOE E GÉMEOS 20 de outubro de 2020 STOLEN FACE / 1952 (A Máscara do Desejo) um filme de Terence Fisher Realização: Terence Fisher / Argumento: Martin Berkeley e Richard H. Landau / Fotografia: Walter Harvey / Montagem: Maurice Rootes / Música: Malcolm Arnold / Intérpretes: Paul Henreid (Dr. Philip Ritter), Lizabeth Scott (Alice Brent, Lily-B), Mary Mackenzie (Lily-A), André Morell (David), John Wood (Dr. Jack Wilson), Susan Stephen (Betty), Arnold Ridley (Dr. Russell), Everley Gregg (Lady Haringay), Cyril Smith (Alf), Janet Burnell (Maggie), etc. Produção: Anthony Hinds, para Hammer-Lippert-Exclusive Studios/ Cópia: 16mm, preto e branco, legendado eletronicamente em português, 73 minutos / Estreia Mundial: Junho de 1952 / Estreia em Portugal: Éden, em 29 de Julho de 1955. _____________________________ So Long at the Fair foi o último filme de Terence Fisher para as companhias subsidiárias de Arthur Rank. As provas dadas pelo realizador, de inteligência, rapidez de trabalho e economia de meios garantiam-lhe uma promissora carreira na major britânica. Porém, a forma como o sistema de produção evoluía ia coarctando a pouco e pouco a independência, impondo métodos de trabalho que pouco lhe interessavam (e a eternizar-se na realização a dupla Fisher-Anthony Darnborough seria inevitável uma subalternização do primeiro dada a qualidade de produtor do segundo). Fisher preferiu outros caminhos que o levaram a assinar um contrato, em 1951, com uma pequena companhia, a Hammer, mantendo ainda a possibilidade de trabalhar para outros produtores. Aliás, a transição de Fisher faz-se exactamente com um filme independente, produzido por Lance Comfort (também conhecido como realizador), Home to Danger, que nada acrescenta à obra de Fisher, sendo mesmo um dos seus trabalhos mais desinteressantes.
    [Show full text]
  • 'How Many Female Scientists Do You Know?'
    Review Endeavour Vol.29 No.2 June 2005 ‘How many female scientists do you know?’ Robert A. Jones 4 Leighton Avenue, Meols, Wirral, UK CH47 0LZ The stereotypical scientist wears a lab-coat, is often Female scientists in British films eccentric and is usually male. Images of female scientists The characters of the female scientists in most of these in popular culture remain rare. Some of the first films are not simply versions of the male scientist portrayals of women in science occurred in a handful stereotype played by the opposite sex. They are ordinary of British films made during the 1950s and 1960s. These working women and their situations accurately reflected films reflected the difficulties experienced by women in the conditions for women working in science at that time. science at the time, but they might also explain why However, this is not because the film-makers were representations of female scientists in film continue to searching for realism, but because they were hoping to downplay their role as scientists and emphasize their broaden the appeal of the films by including a ‘love identity as women. interest’. Several generalizations can be made about the way that female scientists are portrayed in these films. Carry On with science If you were looking for an image of a female scientist in a Alone but ordinary British film, you probably wouldn’t think of starting with In all of these films there is only one female scientist the Carry On films. But in the 1960 film Watch Your Stern, working as part of the research team.
    [Show full text]
  • Robert Hartford-Davis and British Exploitation Cinema of the 1960S
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by University of East Anglia digital repository Corrupted, Tormented and Damned: Reframing British Exploitation Cinema and The films of Robert Hartford-Davis This copy of the thesis has been supplied on condition that anyone who consults it is understood to recognise that its copyright rests with the author and that use of any information derived there from must be in accordance with current UK Copyright Law. In addition, any quotation or extract must include full attribution. Michael Ahmed, M.A., B.A. PhD University of East Anglia Faculty of Film and Television Studies January 2013 Abstract The American exploitation film functioned as an alternative to mainstream Hollywood cinema, and served as a way of introducing to audiences shocking, controversial themes, as well as narratives that major American studios were reluctant to explore. Whereas American exploitation cinema developed in parallel to mainstream Hollywood, exploitation cinema in Britain has no such historical equivalent. Furthermore, the definition of exploitation, in terms of the British industry, is currently used to describe (according to the Encyclopedia of British Film) either poor quality sex comedies from the 1970s, a handful of horror films, or as a loosely fixed generic description dependent upon prevailing critical or academic orthodoxies. However, exploitation was a term used by the British industry in the 1960s to describe a wide-ranging and eclectic variety of films – these films included, ―kitchen-sink dramas‖, comedies, musicals, westerns, as well as many films from Continental Europe and Scandinavia. Therefore, the current description of an exploitation film in Britain has changed a great deal from its original meaning.
    [Show full text]
  • The Uncanny on Talking Pictures TV This Chilling Trilogy of Horror Tales Involving Feline Misbehaviour Features a fine Cast of Actors for Each of the Three Stories
    Talking Pictures TV www.talkingpicturestv.co.uk Highlights for week beginning SKY 328 | FREEVIEW 81 Mon 2nd March 2020 FREESAT 306 | VIRGIN 445 The Uncanny on Talking Pictures TV This chilling trilogy of horror tales involving feline misbehaviour features a fine cast of actors for each of the three stories. Directed by Denis Héroux, the film stars include: Ray Milland, Samantha Eggar, Donald Pleasence, Susan Penhaligon, Joan Greenwood, Donald Pilon and Alexandra Stewart with Peter Cushing heading the cast as the author who believes that cats intend to take over the world. He narrates three tales he has written to prove this, in which cats figure as the instruments of disaster for the humans they live with; or are they the bringers of justice? Each story contains elements of revenge, violence and suspense, all presented using interesting special effects. It is always the evil humans who are punished, however. Are the cats responsible for the unfortunate events portrayed or are the humans blaming them? Airs on Fri 6th Mar at 10pm. Mon 2nd Mar 11:30 Wed 4th Mar 15:35 and Sat 7th Mar 11:35 Portrait of Clare (1950) The Conquest of Everest (1953) Drama, directed by: Lance Comfort. Documentary, directed by: George Stars: Margaret Johnston, Richard Lowe. Stars: Edmund Hillary, Tenzing Todd, Robin Bailey, Ronald Howard, Norgay, John Hunt. A dramatic film Mary Clare, Marjorie Fielding. While which tells the story of the British helping with preparations for her expedition which in 1953 reached granddaughter’s engagement party, the top peak of the highest mountain Clare tells the young girl about her in the world – Mount Everest.
    [Show full text]