Scientology Final

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Scientology Final Shelby Gluskin Ms. Plummer English 211 24 April 2018 Scientology’s Life Span Scientology is constantly being questioned on its legitimacy as a religion and on the almost secretive way in which the church conducts its business. Most people who give Scientology only a cursory glance do not believe that it meets the criteria to both identify and sustain itself as a mainstream religion; however, there is plenty of evidence to dispute this finding. As the Merriam Webster Dictionary defines religion as “the belief in god or a group of gods: an organized system of beliefs, ceremonies and rules used to worship a god or group of gods”, it is hard to dispute that Scientology is in fact a religion (Religion). Scientology is ​ ​ described as the religion of seeking spiritual fulfillment through study (What Is Scientology). As the influence of religion declines in society and fewer people identify themselves as being observant, this church continues to hold and attract members. Scientology is able to maintain its status as a viable and even thriving religion through the covert actions of the Church, excessive funding, and an abundant amount of celebrity endorsement. With the ability to keep negative and threatening secrets out of the view of the public’s eye, Scientology can maintain its carefully cultivated image. The Church of Scientology is able to keep its actions under the radar through intimidation of both members and critics of the organization. The Church is known to go to great lengths to protect the sanctity of the institution, in fact, in the early 1980’s eleven Scientologists were convicted of infiltrating more than one-hundred agencies, government and private (Behar 50). The goal of their actions was to stop and to hinder investigations into Scientology. It is because of these kinds of actions that people think of Scientology as a cult or a mafia-like organization. Joe Nocera of the New York Times uses this particular example to prove that the Church of Scientology will go above and beyond legal avenues to attract new followers and become a mainstream religion. To ensure the Church’s security the ruling hierarchy of the Church, the Sea Organization, is continually monitoring threats to its survival. One such threat that put Scientologists on high alert was the Cult Awareness Network. The Cult Awareness Network was a well-known, privately owned national hotline founded in the late 1970’s, where many called if concerned about friends or family members association with a cult (Anti-Cult Group Dismembered As Former Foes Buy Its ​ Assets). The Network had around twenty chapters monitoring cults, and no organization caused ​ more phone calls pleading for help than Scientology (Behar 50). The Church used its considerable resources to devote itself to the downfall of this organization. In 1997, the Church of Scientology put the Network into bankruptcy with a lawsuit, and took over control of the Cult Awareness programs (51). This Network was putting a bad name to Scientology, something the Church stands very strongly against. When people become members of Scientology, the Church indoctrinates the novices with the mandate that they are to avoid discussing the organization outside of the Church. L. Ron Hubbard, the founder of Scientology, implemented a form of training or brainwashing that convinces new members that sources outside of the Church like the internet or the newspapers are lying and will do anything to put an end to something decent like Scientology (Nededog). Members are taught to believe that the smartest and safest decision is to talk and associate with truthful and good human beings, and the only people who qualify are Scientologists. In order to keep the Church interactions documented, every conversation between the Church and members are recorded and videotaped for the protection of the Church (Nededog). If someone feels the need to talk about the Church in a negative manner, the recordings are utilized to discredit what one is saying. This allows most conflict to be instantly put to rest, and in this type of case, the member would be shunned with nothing to their name. As social interactions of the members is almost entirely with other Church members, an individual who is shunned by the Church is cast out of the society that has influenced almost all facets of life. Often lifelong bonds, including those with family members, are broken when a group shuns an individual. The Church has developed an intricate and at times ruthless framework to maintain its image. Another way the Church stays away from a negative connotation is that all members of the Church of Scientology are restricted from reaching out for legal services against another members. All situations are handled internally so nothing will scare people away from joining (Nededog). The extent to which the Church is able to achieve this end is demonstrated by the number of individuals that remain devoted to the cause and the number of people who continue to join. Successfully protecting the Church’s public image leads to membership growth which inevitably leads to a huge influx of money and labor. The people operating Scientology are extremely intelligent, even though some actions could be considered morally bankrupt, if not criminal. To be considered a member, one must devote two and a half hours per day, at least forty years of his/her life, and a minimum of two-hundred and fifty thousand dollars (Nededog). That alone is just about fifteen million dollars in global membership (Recessionista). Donations, real estate holdings, and revenue from its many corporation’s average approximately five-hundred million dollars annually. This does not even include the various fees the Church charges for other organizations who wish to be affiliated, counseling sessions for members, and the hundreds of books published by L. Ron Hubbard that are sold for profit (Recessionista). It is the combination of membership dues and product sales, in conjunction with their status as a religion, which provides them with an extraordinary degree of financial security. This money provides the Church and the Sea Organization a security blanket to act as they wish. As a religious organization, Scientology is granted many government privileges not extended to business which are designated as “for profit”. Because they are an official religious organization, they are actually able to set their own salaries despite being labeled a non-profit (Hubbard). The ability to set prices and salaries with impunity ensures sure that the Church’s funds do not dwindle. Unfortunately, Sea Organization members who are charged with the running of the Church typically get paid very little per week (Miscavige et al.). Since the members are used to the strict rules of the Church this is considered acceptable to the employees (Augustine). Actually becoming part of the Sea Org is considered a huge honor. The most devoted Scientologists join the Sea Org and agree to serve Scientology for one billion years (Defectors Say Church of Scientology Hides Abuse). This one-billion-year sentence is because Scientologists believe in reincarnations, so when someone passes they are still expected to return and serve in the next life (Defectors Say Church of Scientology Hides Abuse). The member’s extravagant and selfless commitment secures people who will act as missionaries, as well as saves money for the Church. However, arguably the most abusive way in which the Church saves money is by making it a requirement for those who are not members of Sea Org to volunteer their services. This is ostensibly a demonstration of their devotion to the church and covertly a form of free labor. These members can volunteer almost fifty hours a week in addition to holding a job outside of Scientology to support their families and pay dues to the Church (Reeve). This may seem like servitude, but unless members have left the Church, many do not realize the extreme conditions because of the indoctrination they have undergone and the close knit community within which they function. Without money, no organization can flourish, so Scientology’s careful cultivation and utilization of free labor is crucial to its success. The largest financial benefit of Scientology comes from the Church’s status as a religion. This benefit is what is known as a religious tax exemption. According to James Kirchick, Scientology was originally founded by Hubbard as a for-profit in 1952, but he soon realized that his profits were greatly compromised because of this status (14). After the Church officially became a non-profit, the International Revenue Service still did not recognize Scientology as a religion and would not allow a tax exemption (Nocera). After multiple lawsuits, the IRS conducted a two-year detailed examination to decide whether or not Scientology could be granted a religious tax exemption, and because of the Church’s ability to hide any and all flaws they are now considered a religion in the eyes of the IRS (Church of Scientology IRS Tax Exemption). This exemption and government approved standing does not simply save the Church almost twenty-eight million dollars in property and income taxes, but also means that it would be extremely difficult to destroy the Church of Scientology (Matthews). When the IRS granted Scientology status as a religion, it served to provide legitimacy in the court of public opinion. If the Church has to power to manipulate and possibly defraud the International Revenue Service, its power and influence is almost unstoppable. The power of Scientology does not just come from its funding, but from the influential support of public figures which helps it position itself in a positive light. Celebrities do not just provide millions of dollars to the Church but also provide endorsement and public relations (Nededog).
Recommended publications
  • The Israeli Center for Victims of Cults Who Is Who? Who Is Behind It?
    Human Rights Without Frontiers Int’l Avenue d’Auderghem 61/16, 1040 Brussels Phone/Fax: 32 2 3456145 Email: [email protected] – Website: http://www.hrwf.eu No Entreprise: 0473.809.960 The Israeli Center for Victims of Cults Who is Who? Who is Behind it? By Willy Fautré The Israeli Center for Victims of Cults About the so-called experts of the Israeli Center for Victims of Cults and Yad L'Achim Rami Feller ICVC Directors Some Other So-called Experts Some Dangerous Liaisons of the Israeli Center for Victims of Cults Conclusions Annexes Brussels, 1 September 2018 The Israeli Center for Victims of Cults Who is Who? Who is Behind it? The Israeli Center for Victims of Cults (ICVC) is well-known in Israel for its activities against a number of religious and spiritual movements that are depicted as harmful and dangerous. Over the years, the ICVC has managed to garner easy access to the media and Israeli government due to its moral panic narratives and campaign for an anti-cult law. It is therefore not surprising that the ICVC has also emerged in Europe, in particular, on the website of FECRIS (European Federation of Centers of Research and Information on Cults and Sects), as its Israel correspondent.1 For many years, FECRIS has been heavily criticized by international human rights organizations for fomenting social hostility and hate speech towards non-mainstream religions and worldviews, usually of foreign origin, and for stigmatizing members of these groups.2 Religious studies scholars and the scientific establishment in general have also denounced FECRIS for the lack of expertise of their so-called “cult experts”.
    [Show full text]
  • Recommendations of Experts for Improvements in Federal Law Enforcement After Waco
    If you have issues viewing or accessing this file contact us at NCJRS.gov. U.S. Department of Justice Washington,D.C. 20530 Recommendations of Experts for Improvements in Federal Law Enforcement After Waco 145688 U.S. Department of Justice National Institute of Justice This document has been reproduced exactly as received from the person or organization originating it. Points of view or opinions stated in this document are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position or policies of the National Institute of Justice. Permission to reproduce thisllll~ material has been granted by Publ:Cc Domain U.S. Dep~nt of Justice ustice Re .......... of the N£ Recommendations of Experts for improvements in Federal Law Enforcement After Waco TABLE OF CONTENTS Mandate to the Experts Handling Hostage/Barricade Situations Robert J, Louden Ronald McCarthy Ariel Merari Dealing with Persons whose Motivations and Thought Processes are Unconventional \, Nancy T. Ammerman Robert Canero Lawrence E. Sullivan Coordinating Law Enforcement Efforts in Hostage/Barricade Situations Colin E. Birt Richard J. Davis William H. Webster O @ @ UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT MEMORANDUM J~e ~,1~3 TO: Dr. Nancy Ammerman Mr. Colin B/rt Dr. Robert Cancro Mr. Richard J. Davis Mr. Robert J. Louden Mr. Ronald M. McCarthy Dr. Ariel Merafi @ Dr. Alan A. Stone Dr. Lawrence E. Sull/van Mr..William H. Webster FROM: Philip B. Heymann ~.~. Deputy Attorney General Department of Justice Ronald IC Noble Assistant Secretary (Enforcement) Department of the Treasury Q SUBJECT: your R01e in M~g Recommendations Concerning the Handling of Incidents Such asthe Branch Davidian Standoff in Waco, Texas @ L MANDATE We would like you to assist us in addressing issues that federal law enforcement confi'0n~ ~ bani'cade/hos~g e situatiom such as the stand-off that occurred near Waco, Texas, ~tween February 28, 1993 and April 19, 1993.
    [Show full text]
  • New Religious Movements
    New Religious Movements New Religious Movements: Challenge and response is a searching and wide-ranging collection of essays on the contemporary phenomenon of new religions. The contributors to this volume are all established specialists in the sociology, theology, law, or the history of new minority movements. The primary focus is the response of the basic institutions of society to the challenge which new religious movements represent. The orientation of this volume is to examine the way in which new movements in general have affected modern society in areas such as economic organisation; the operation of the law; the role of the media; the relationship of so-called ‘cult’ membership to mental health; and the part which women have played in leading or supporting new movements. Specific instances of these relationships are illustrated by reference to many of the most prominent new religions – Hare Krishna, The Brahma Kumaris, The Unification Church, The Jesus Army, The Family’, The Church of Scientology, and Wicca. For students of religion or sociology, New Religious Movements is an invaluable source of information, an example of penetrating analysis, and a series of thought-provoking contributions to a debate which affects many areas of contemporary life in many parts of the world. Contributors: Eileen Barker, James Beckford, Anthony Bradney, Colin Campbell, George Chryssides, Peter Clarke, Paul Heelas, Massimo Introvigne, Lawrence Lilliston, Gordon Melton, Elizabeth Puttick, Gary Shepherd, Colin Slee, Frank Usarski, Bryan Wilson. Bryan Wilson is an Emeritus Fellow of All Souls College, Oxford. He is the author and editor of several books on sects and New Religious Movements.
    [Show full text]
  • Abgrall, Jean-Marie, 175 Agonshû, 192 Aguilera, Davy, 160–161
    Cambridge University Press 0521660645 - Cults, Religion, and Violence Edited by David G. Bromley and J. Gordon Melton Index More information INDEX Abgrall, Jean-Marie, 175 Ascended Masters, 33–34 Agonshu,ˆ 192 asceticism, 9, 196 Aguilera, Davy, 160–161 Association of World Academics for Akhnaton, Pharoah, 84 Religious Education (AWARE), 133 Alliance for the Preservation of Religious Association pour la D´efensede la Famille et de Liberty (APRL), 133 I’Individual (ADFI), 232 Allred, Rulon, 49 Aum Shinrikyo,ˆ 3, 9, 36–38, 67, 74–75, Amenta Club, 33, 171 88, 103–104, 189–207, 233 Ammerman, Nancy, 121 background, 191–193 Amnesty International, 139 Aum Victim’s Society (Aum Higaisha no Ananda Marga, 129 Kai), 202, 206 Ancient and Mystical Order Rosae Crucis “Away Team,” 39, 217 (AMORC), 171 Andrade, Guillermor, 160–161 BATF. See Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Andrade, Isabel, 160–161 Firearms anti-abortion “rescue” movement, 63 Bellaton, Dominique, 173 anticult organizations, 21–24, 42, 60, 107, Berg, David, 17, 19 116–117, 170, 175 Bernard, Raymond, 171 Apocalypticism, 6, 9, 20–21, 34, 40, Besant, Annie, 65 59–67, 71, 96, 178, 190, 200, 236 biological weapons, 204–205 apostates, 29, 34, 59, 60, 71, 88–89, 107, Black Muslims, 24 117, 154, 178, 181 Black Panther Party, 152 Apostolic United Brethren, 49 Block, David, 161–162 Applewhite, Marshal “Herff” (Do), 38–39, Bo and Peep, 210–226 93, 104, 184, 210–227 Bokelson, Jan, 43 Archedia Club, 33 botulism, 203 Arginy movement, 171 brainwashing, 21, 42, 68, 176 Armageddon, 30, 36, 110 Branch Davidians, 3, 8, 19, 30–33, 43, 58, Asahara, Shokˆ o,ˆ 36–38, 62–63, 75, 88, 59, 62–63, 71, 102–103, 149–168 192–203 background, 150–151 245 © Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 0521660645 - Cults, Religion, and Violence Edited by David G.
    [Show full text]
  • Group Research, Inc. Records, 1955-1996 MS# 0525 ©2007 Columbia University Library
    Group Research, Inc. Records, 1955-1996 MS# 0525 ©2007 Columbia University Library This document is converted from a legacy finding aid. We provide this Internet-accessible document in the hope that users interested in this collection will find this information useful. At some point in the future, should time and funds permit, this finding aid may be updated. SUMMARY INFORMATION Creator Group Research, Inc. Title and dates Group Research, Inc. Records, 1955-1996 Abstract Founded by Wesley McCune and based in Washington DC until ceasing operations in the mid-1990s, Group Research Inc. collected materials that focus on the right-wing and span four decades. The collection contains correspondence, memos, reports, card files, audio-visual material, printed matter, clippings, etc. Size 215 linear ft. (512 document boxes; Map Case 14/16/05 and flat box #727) Call number MS# 0525 Location Columbia University Butler Library, 6th Floor Rare Book and Manuscript Library 535 West 114th Street Page 1 of 142 Group Research Records Box New York, NY 10027 Language(s) of material English History of Group Research, Inc. A successful journalist for such magazines as Newsweek, Time, Life and Changing Times as well as a staff member of several government agencies and government-related organizations, Wesley McCune founded Group Research Inc. in 1962. Based in Washington DC until ceasing operations in the mid-1990s Group Research Inc. collected materials that focus on the right--wing and span four decades. The resulting Group Research archive includes information about and by right-wing organizations and activists in the form of publications correspondence pamphlets reports newspaper Congressional Record and magazine clippings and other ephemera.
    [Show full text]
  • Researching New Religious Movements
    Researching New Religious Movements ‘The most important “first” that this book achieves is its bold questioning of the whole intellectual apparatus of the sociology of religion as it has been applied to the understanding of the new religious movements. I am confident that Elisabeth Arweck’s study will quickly become required reading in the sociology of new religious movements.’ Professor David Martin, Emeritus Professor of Sociology, London School of Economics, University of London ‘Powerful and original . it succeeds triumphantly in being at the same time an important, high-quality academic study and a book for our times.’ Professor David Marsland, Professorial Research Fellow in Sociology, University of Buckingham New religious movements such as Scientology, Jehovah’s Witnesses and the Unification Church (Moonies) are now well established in mainstream cul- tural consciousness. However, responses to these ‘cult’ groups still tend to be overwhelmingly negative, characterized by the furious reactions that they evoke from majority interests. Modern societies need to learn how to respond to such movements and how to interpret their benefits and dangers. Researching New Religious Movements provides a fresh look at the history and development of ‘anti-cult’ groups and the response of main- stream churches to these new movements. In this unique reception study, Elisabeth Arweck traces the path of scholarship of new religious move- ments, exploring the development of research in this growing field. She con- siders academic and media interventions on both sides, with special emphasis on the problems of objectivity inherent in terminologies of ‘sects’, ‘cults’, and ‘brainwashing’. Ideal for students and researchers, this much- needed book takes the debate over new religious movements to a more sophisticated level.
    [Show full text]
  • Scientology-Outline.Pdf
    Gluskin 1 Shelby Gluskin Ms. Plummer English 211 17 April 2018 Scientology’s Life Span Introduction: Scientology is constantly being questioned on how it is staying afloat and poorly talked about, but if anything, the Church has many factors, positive and negative, that allows it to continue to survive. Thesis: Scientology is able to maintain its’ status through celebrity endorsement, excessive funding, and the exclusive actions of the Church. Body Paragraphs: I. With the ability to keep negative and threatening secrets out of the way from the public’s eye, Scientology is a thriving religion. A. The Church of Scientology is able to keep their actions under the radar through intimidation of both members and critics of the organization. 1. In the early 1980’s about eleven Scientologists were convicted of infiltrating more than one-hundred agencies, government and private. The goal of their actions was to stop and to hinder investigations into Scientology. 2. These mafia like actions according to Joe Nocera of the New York Times prove that the Church will go above and beyond to attract new followers and become a mainstream religion. B. A main threat to Scientology was the Cult Awareness Network. The Network had around twenty chapters monitoring cults and no organization caused more phone calls pleading for help than Scientology did (Behar 50). Gluskin 2 1. Scientology took notice of this and in 1997 put the Network into bankruptcy with a lawsuit, and took over the Cult Awareness programs (51). C. When people become members of Scientology, the Church practically brainwashes them to avoid discussing the organization outside of the Church.
    [Show full text]
  • Combatting CULT MIND CONTROL
    Combatting CULT MIND CONTROL STEVEN HASSAN IIIIIIIHII Park Street Press / dedicate this book to people all over the world who have ever experienced the loss of their personal freedom, in the hope that it might help ease their suffering. Park Street Press One Park Street Rochester, VT 05767 Copyright © 1988, 1990 by Steven Hassan All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Hassan, Steven. Combatting cult mind control / Steven Hassan, p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 0-89281-311-3 1. Cults—Controversial literature. 2. Cults—Psychological aspects. 3. Hassan, Steven. I. Title. BP603.H375 1990 306'. I—dc20 90-43697 CIP Printed and bound in the United States 10 98765432 Park Street Press is a division of Inner Traditions International, Ltd. Distributed to the book trade in Canada by Book Center, Inc., Montreal, Quebec Contents Foreword by Margaret Singer xiii Preface xvii Chapter 1 Exit-Counseling: The Background 1 Chapter 2 My Life in the Unification Church 12 Chapter 3 The Threat: Mind Control Cults Today 35 Chapter 4 Understanding Mind Control 53 Chapter 5 Cult Psychology 76 Chapter 6 Cult Assessment: How to Protect Yourself 95 Chapter 7 Exit-Counseling: Freedom Without Coercion 112 Chapter 8 How to Help 132 Chapter 9 Unlocking Cult Mind Control 148 Chapter 10 Strategies for Recovery 168 Chapter 11 The Next Step 187 Appendix Lifton's Eight Criteria of Mind Control 200 Resource Organizations 206 Endnotes 211 Bibliography 221 Index 233 About the Author 237 I Acknowledgments With heartfelt gratitude, I thank my parents, Milton and Estelle Hassan, for all their love and support.
    [Show full text]
  • Scott V. Ross United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
    Scott v. Ross 151 F.3d 1247 98 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6619, 98 Daily Journal D.A.R. 9171 Jason SCOTT, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Rick ROSS, aka Rickey Allen Ross; Mark Workman; Charles Simpson, Defendants, and Cult Awareness Network, a California Non-Profit Corp., Defendant-Appellant. No. 96-35050. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Aug. 26, 1998. Before: SCHROEDER and BEEZER, Circuit Judges, and SCHWARZER,* Senior District Judge. Order; Concurrence by Judge SCHROEDER; Dissent by Judge KOZINSKI. ORDER The majority of the panel has voted to deny the petition for rehearing. Judge Schwarzer votes to grant the petition. Judge Schroeder votes to reject the suggestion for rehearing en banc and Judge Beezer so recommends. The full court was advised of the suggestion for rehearing en banc. An active judge requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. The matter failed to receive a majority of the votes of the nonrecused active judges in favor of en banc consideration. Pursuant to Rule 35(b) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, the petition for rehearing is DENIED and the suggestion for rehearing en banc is REJECTED. Appellee's motion to vacate this court's October 27, 1997 Order staying execution of judgment is granted. SCHROEDER, J., concurring: 1 I agree fully with Judge Beezer's opinion and write separately only to emphasize a key fact in this case. In Judge Schwarzer's dissent, his bread-delivery hypothetical suggests that Landa might have made the referral to Ross on behalf of an anti-cult organization other than CAN.
    [Show full text]
  • Ce Document Est Le Fruit D'un Long Travail Approuvé Par Le Jury De Soutenance Et Mis À Disposition De L'ensemble De La Communauté Universitaire Élargie
    AVERTISSEMENT Ce document est le fruit d'un long travail approuvé par le jury de soutenance et mis à disposition de l'ensemble de la communauté universitaire élargie. Il est soumis à la propriété intellectuelle de l'auteur. Ceci implique une obligation de citation et de référencement lors de l’utilisation de ce document. D'autre part, toute contrefaçon, plagiat, reproduction illicite encourt une poursuite pénale. Contact : [email protected] LIENS Code de la Propriété Intellectuelle. articles L 122. 4 Code de la Propriété Intellectuelle. articles L 335.2- L 335.10 http://www.cfcopies.com/V2/leg/leg_droi.php http://www.culture.gouv.fr/culture/infos-pratiques/droits/protection.htm Université Paul Verlaine – Metz UFR Lettres et langues Master Langues et Cultures Étrangères Spécialité Mondes anglophones What Led to the Surge of New Religious Movements, Spirituality and Self-Development in the United States? Mémoire de recherche – UE 102 Présenté par Charles-Edouard BUSA Sous la direction de M. Peterson NNAJIOFOR Année universitaire 2010-2011 1e/2e session TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................... 3 1. The Evolution of America’s Religious Landscape Throughout History ............ 8 1.1. Religion in Colonial Times: Diversity and Tolerance? .......................... 9 1.2. The Great Awakenings ........................................................................... 13 1.3. America’s Religious Landscape from the 1920s Onwards ....................
    [Show full text]
  • The Mind Benders.Pdf
    The Mind Benders Scientology by Cyril Vosper THE BOOK THEY TRIED TO BAN A fast, furious, funny, violent exposure of a major global cult "Indicates quackery of a type which might be dangerous behind closed doors ..." HIS LORDSHIP, THE MASTER OF THE ROLLS "... capable of such danger that the public interest demands that people should know what is going on" LORD DENNING INDEX Frontispiece: Declaration of an Enemy Prologue 1. Why Scientology? 2. Assumptions 3. The Thetan 4. The Mind 5. Past Lives 6. Auditing 7. Training 8. Clear 9. Operating Thetan 10. Ethics 11. Promotion 12. The Organisations of Scientology Epilogue Appendix Acknowledgements Plates (from the 1971 Neville Spearman edition, SBN 85435 061 6) The author's experience of Scientology stretches over a period of 14 years from when it was a little known and interesting form of psychotherapy, to September 1968 when he was declared an S.P. (Suppressive Person). This meant that he was considered 'Fair Game'. As Sir Elwyn Jones Q.C. said in the recent Scientology libel case, S.Ps. 'could be deprived of property or injured by any means by any Scientologist. He could be tricked, sued or lied to, or destroyed.' The direct cause of this action was the breakdown of the author's marriage and separation of his children. Mr. Vosper, who was a senior official at the Scientology H.Q. at Saint Hill, East Grinstead, Sussex, believes that it is time for a close and accurate inspection of Scientology so that people know the full facts before they consider joining it.
    [Show full text]
  • Eileen Barker the Cult As a Social Problem
    Eileen Barker The cult as a social problem Book section Original citation: Originally published in Barker, Eileen (2010) The cult as a social problem. In: Hjem, Titus, (ed.) Religion and social problems. Routledge Advances in Sociology . Routledge, New York, USA, pp. 198-212. ISBN 9780415800563 © 2010 The Author This version available at: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/50874/ Available in LSE Research Online: November 2013 LSE has developed LSE Research Online so that users may access research output of the School. Copyright © and Moral Rights for the papers on this site are retained by the individual authors and/or other copyright owners. Users may download and/or print one copy of any article(s) in LSE Research Online to facilitate their private study or for non-commercial research. You may not engage in further distribution of the material or use it for any profit-making activities or any commercial gain. You may freely distribute the URL (http://eprints.lse.ac.uk) of the LSE Research Online website. This document is the author’s submitted version of the book section. There may be differences between this version and the published version. You are advised to consult the publisher’s version if you wish to cite from it. Page 1 of 13 The Cult as a Social Problem Eileen Barker Jesus was undoubtedly a problem – as were the early Christians, Mohammed and the early Muslims, and Wesley and the early Methodists. Today, L. Ron Hubbard and the Church of Scientology, Louis Farrakhan and the Nation of Islam, Li Hongzhi and Falun Gong; Osama bin Laden and Al Qaida have all been considered a threat not only to their individual followers but also to the very fabric of society.
    [Show full text]