Annual Report and Accounts 2016/17
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Annual Report and Accounts 2017/18
!""#$%&'()*'+&$",&$--*#"+.&/012314& &&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&5#6$"&78..#(&!#+9*'8+:&&& ! ! & & & & & & & & & & & & Annual report and accounts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
NHS England Letter Template
OFFICIAL National Medical Directorate NHS England and NHS Improvement Ms Emma Brown Skipton House Area Coroner for Birmingham and 80 London Road Solihull LONDON The Coroner's Court SE1 6LH 50 Newton Street Birmingham B4 6NE Telephone: Email: 20th September 2019 Email: Dear Ms Brown, Re: Regulation 28 Report to Prevent Future Deaths – David Jonothan Jukes (09/10/2018) Thank you for your Regulation 28 Report dated 12 July 2019 concerning the death of David Jonothan Jukes on 09 October 2018. I was very saddened to read of the circumstances surrounding Mr Jukes’s death and would like to extend my condolences to his family and loved ones during this very difficult time. Please note this response will address the matters of concern from a national level and we would expect the local NHS agencies, which I note are copied in to the letter, to address the local concerns raised. Sufficient information regarding arrests was not provided to liaison and diversion practitioner: NHS England and NHS Improvement will work with police forces to ensure that all relevant information from a police perspective is given to the liaison and diversion practitioner, including the nature of the detained person’s presentation at the point of arrest, if relevant. We will commit to a national event by the end of March 2020 to debrief on this matter and any other information sharing/exchange issues that have been raised in other reports. We will invite liaison and diversion practitioners as well as NHS Commissioners and police representatives in order to share lessons -
Annual Report
Our 2018/19 Annual Report Health and high quality care for all, now and for future generations HC 2293 NHS England Annual Report and Accounts 2018/19 NHS England is legally referred to as the National Health Service Commissioning Board. Presented to Parliament pursuant to the National Health Service Act 2006 (as amended by the Health and Social Care Act 2012). Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed 11 July 2019 HC 2293 © Crown copyright 2019 This publication is licensed under the terms of the Open Government Licence v3.0 except where otherwise stated. To view this licence, visit nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3 Where we have identified any third party copyright information you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. This publication is available at www.gov.uk/official-documents Any enquiries regarding this publication should be sent to us at: NHS England, Quarry House, Quarry Hill, Leeds, LS2 7UE. ISBN 978-1-5286-1036-0 CCS0219647926 07/19 Printed on paper containing 75% recycled fibre content minimum Printed in the UK by the APS Group on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office Contents A view from Lord David Prior, Chair ............................................................................7 About NHS England ......................................................................................................9 Performance Report ......................................................................................................13 Chief Executive’s -
Short-Term Forecasts to Inform the Response to the Covid-19 Epidemic in the UK
medRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.11.11.20220962; this version posted December 4, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY 4.0 International license . Short-term forecasts to inform the response to the Covid-19 epidemic in the UK 1* 1 2 3 4,5 6,7 6 1 8 Funk S , Abbott S , Atkins BD , Baguelin M , Baillie JK , Birrell P , Blake J , Bosse NI , Burton J , 7 1 6,7 2 1 1 3 Carruthers J , Davies NG , De Angelis D , Dyson L , Edmunds WJ , Eggo RM , Ferguson NM , 3 2 2 1 2 2 9 10 Gaythorpe K , Gorsich E , Guyver-Fletcher G , Hellewell J , Hill EM , Holmes A , House TA , Jewell C , 1 1 11 2 12 3 1 13 Jit M , Jombart T , Joshi I , Keeling MJ , Kendall E , Knock ES , Kucharski AJ , Lythgoe KA , Meakin 1 1 14 9 9 11 3 9,15 SR , Munday JD , Openshaw PJM , Overton CE , Pagani F , Pearson J , Perez-Guzman PN , Pellis L , 16 17,18 1 12 2 7 3,7 Scarabel F , Semple MG , Sherratt K , Tang M , Tildesley MJ , Van Leeuwen E , Whittles LK , CMMID COVID-19 Working Group, Imperial College COVID-19 Response Team, ISARIC4C Investigators 1 Centre for Mathematical Modelling of Infectious Diseases, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Keppel St, London, WC1E 7HT, UK 2 The Zeeman Institute for Systems Biology & Infectious Disease -
Clinical Negligence Cases in the English NHS: Uncertainty in Evidence As a Driver of Settlement Costs and Societal Outcomes
Health Economics, Policy and Law (2021), page 1 of 16 doi:10.1017/S1744133121000177 ARTICLE Clinical negligence cases in the English NHS: uncertainty in evidence as a driver of settlement costs and societal outcomes Alexander W. Carter1* , Elias Mossialos1,2 , Julian Redhead3 and Vassilios Papalois3,4 1Department of Health Policy, London School of Economics & Political Science, London, UK, 2Institute of Global Health Innovation, Imperial College London, London, UK, 3Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK and 4Department of Surgery & Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK *Corresponding author. Email: [email protected] (Received 1 May 2020; revised 15 March 2021; accepted 17 March 2021) Abstract The cost of clinical negligence claims continues to rise, despite efforts to reduce this now ageing burden to the National Health Service (NHS) in England. From a welfarist perspective, reforms are needed to reduce avoidable harm to patients and to settle claims fairly for both claimants and society. Uncertainty in the estimation of quanta of damages, better known as financial settlements, is an important yet poorly char- acterised driver of societal outcomes. This reflects wider limitations to evidence informing clinical negli- gence policy, which has been discussed in recent literature. There is an acute need for practicable, evidence-based solutions that address clinical negligence issues, and these should complement long-stand- ing efforts to improve patient safety. Using 15 claim cases from one NHS Trust between 2004 and 2016, the quality of evidence informing claims was appraised using methods from evidence-based medicine. Most of the evidence informing clinical negligence claims was found to be the lowest quality possible (expert opinion). -
UNDERSTANDING the NEW NHS a Guide for Everyone Working and Training Within the NHS 2 Contents 3
England UNDERSTANDING THE NEW NHS A guide for everyone working and training within the NHS 2 Contents 3 NHS ENGLAND INFORMATION READER BOX Introduction 4 Directorate ◆ The NHS belongs to us all Medical Operations Patients and information Nursing Policy Commissioning development Foreword (Sir Bruce Keogh) 5 Finance Human resources NHS values 6 Publications Gateway Reference: 01486 ◆ NHS values and the NHS Constitution Document purpose Resources ◆ An overview of the Health and Social Care Act 2012 Document name Understanding The New NHS Structure of the NHS in England 8 Author NHS England ◆ The structure of the NHS in England Publication date 26 June 2014 ◆ Finance in the NHS: your questions answered Target audience Running the NHS 12 ◆ Commissioning in the NHS Additional circulation Clinicians working and training within the NHS, allied ◆ Delivering NHS services list health professionals, GPs ◆ Health and wellbeing in the NHS Description An updated guide on the structure and function of Monitoring the NHS 17 the NHS, taking into account the changes of the Health and Social Care Act 2012 ◆ Lessons learned and taking responsibility ◆ Regulation and monitoring in the NHS Action required None Contact details for Dr Felicity Taylor Working in the NHS 20 further information National Medical Director's Clinical ◆ Better training, better care Fellow, Medical Directorate Skipton House NHS leadership 21 80 London Road SE1 6LH ◆ Leading healthcare excellence www.england.nhs.uk/nhsguide/ Quality and innovation in the NHS 22 ◆ High-quality care for all Document status This is a controlled document. While this document may be printed, the The NHS in the United Kingdom 24 electronic version posted on the intranet is the controlled copy. -
Annual Report and Accounts 2018/19 Human Tissue Authority
Annual report and accounts 2018/19 Human Tissue Authority Annual report and accounts 2018/19 Annual report and accounts 2018/19 Human Tissue Authority Human Tissue Authority Annual report and accounts 2018/19 Presented to Parliament pursuant to Schedule 2(16) of the Human Tissue Act 2004. Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed on 27 June 2019 HC 2325 Annual report and accounts 2018/19 Human Tissue Authority © Human Tissue Authority copyright 2019 This publication is licensed under the terms of the Open Government Licence v3.0 except where otherwise stated. To view this licence, visit nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3. Where we have identified any third party copyright information you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. Any enquiries related to this publication should be sent to us at [email protected] This publication is available at www.gov.uk/official-documents ISBN 978-1-5286-1143-5 CCS0319877000 06/19 Printed on paper containing 75% recycled fibre content minimum Printed in the UK by the APS Group on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office Annual report and accounts 2018/19 Human Tissue Authority Contents Foreword 6 Performance 8 Overview ....................................................................................................................................... 9 Performance analysis ................................................................................................................ 16 Accountability 22 Corporate governance -
NHS England and NHS Improvement Is the Umbrella Body That Oversees Healthcare
“No society can legitimately call itself civilised if a sick person is denied medical aid because of lack of means” 1962 hospital 1990 internal 2012 Lansley 2019 long plan market reforms term plan NHS is 1974 health 2000 NHS 2014 5-year born authorities plan forward view • Medicines & Healthcare products • NHS Blood and Transplant Regulatory Agency • NHS Business Services Authority • Public Health England • NHS Resolution • NHS Counter Fraud Authority Commissioners Central Support and Improvement Regulators • NHS England/NHS Improvement • National Institute of Health and Care Excellence • Care Quality Commission • Health Education England • NHS England/NHS Improvement • NHS Digital • Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority • Human Tissue Authority • Health Research Authority ▪ The Department for Health and Social Care is the government department responsible for funding and coming up with policies to do with healthcare in the UK. ▪ NHS England and NHS Improvement is the umbrella body that oversees healthcare. It is an independent body, which means that the Department for Health cannot interfere directly with its decisions. ▪ Clinical Commissioning Groups (CCGs) are responsible for commissioning healthcare for their local area. They are run by GPs, nurses and consultants who assess local health needs and commission the services to meet them. They are in charge of around 60% of the NHS budget. ▪ NHS Foundation Trusts and NHS Trusts provide the care that the CCGs commission. They include hospital, ambulance, mental health, social care -
NHS Richmond Clinical Commissioning Group’S Annual Report for the Financial Year 2018/19
Richmond Clinical Commissioning Group Annual Report and Financial Accounts 2018/19 Contents PERFORMANCE REPORT Welcome from Accountable Officer and Chair Page 3 Performance overview Page 4 Corporate objectives Page 4 The Richmond story Page 6 Summary of achievements during 2018/19 Page 8 Performance analysis Monitoring the quality of health services Page 29 Patient advice and liaison services and complaints Page 30 Freedom of Information (FOI) Page 31 Performance summary Page 31 Sustainability report Page 37 Patient and public engagement (PPE) Page 40 Equality report Page 47 Reducing health inequalities Page 47 Health and wellbeing strategy Page 53 ACCOUNTABILITY REPORT Corporate governance report Members’ report Page 58 Statement of Accountable Officer’s responsibilities Page 75 Governance statement Page 77 Risk management arrangements and effectiveness Page 79 Head of internal audit opinion Page 87 Remuneration and staff report Remuneration report Page 91 Staff report Page 98 Parliamentary accountability and audit report Page 107 Annual Accounts Annex 1 External Audit Opinion Annex 2 2 | Page Welcome from Accountable Officer and Chair Welcome to NHS Richmond Clinical Commissioning Group’s Annual Report for the financial year 2018/19. We have been working as part of the South West London Alliance with our partners Kingston, Sutton, Merton and Wandsworth CCGs for two years now, sharing expertise and making more efficient use of resources. Richmond and Kingston CCGs have also been working together during this time as a local delivery unit within the Alliance headed by Tonia Michaelides as Managing Director. Merton and Wandsworth CCGs have also been operating in this way. In July 2018, the NHS turned 70 and we celebrated the occasion with a range of activities with our partners across the borough. -
Framework Agreement Between the Department of Health and Social Care and NHS Resolution
Framework Agreement between the Department of Health and Social Care and NHS Resolution Published January 2021 Contents 1. Purpose of this document .............................................................................................. 3 2. Purpose of NHS Resolution .......................................................................................... 4 3. Governance ................................................................................................................... 6 Process for setting objectives ........................................................................................... 6 Discharge of statutory functions ....................................................................................... 7 Cross-government clearance............................................................................................ 7 4. Accountability ................................................................................................................ 8 Secretary of State ............................................................................................................. 8 Sponsor department's accounting officer's specific accountabilities and responsibilities as Principal Accounting Officer (PAO) .............................................................................. 8 Responsibilities of NHS Resolution's Chief Executive as Accounting Officer ................... 9 Reviewing performance .................................................................................................. 10 -
Health Research Authority Annual Report and Accounts, HC 312 Session 2012-2013
Health Research Authority Annual report and accounts HC 312 Health Research Authority Annual report and accounts for the period 1 December 2011* to 31 March 2012 Presented to Parliament pursuant to Section 232 (Schedule 15 paragraph 3) of the National Health Service Act 2006 Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed 5th July 2012 HC 312 LONDON: The Stationery Office £16.00 * The Health Research Authority (HRA) was established on 1 December 2011 The National Research Ethics Service (NRES) transferred to the HRA on 1 December 2011 Health Research Authority Annual Report and Accounts 2011-2012 © Health Research Authority (2012) The text of this document (this excludes, where present, the Royal Arms and all departmental and agency logos) may be reproduced free of charge in any format or medium providing that it is reproduced accurately and not in a misleading context The material must be acknowledged as Health Research Authority copyright and the document title specified. Where third party material has been identified, permission from the respective copyright holder must be sought. Any enquiries regarding this publication should be sent to us at HRA, Ground Floor, Skipton House, 80 London Road, London SE1 6LH This publication is also for download at www.official-documents.gov.uk This document is also available from our website at www.hra.nhs.uk ISBN: 9780102977561 Printed in the UK by The Stationery Office Limited on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office ID: P002488734 07/12 Printed on paper containing 75% recycled fibre content minimum The Health Research Authority (HRA) was established on 1 December 2011. -
NHSE/I's System Oversight Framework 2021/22 Consultation
NHS Resolution response to: NHSE/I’s System Oversight Framework 2021/22 Consultation Submitted: Friday 14 May 2021 About NHS Resolution NHS Resolution is an arm’s-length body of the Department of Health and Social Care. We provide expertise to the NHS on resolving concerns and disputes fairly, sharing learning for improvement and preserving resources for patient care. Our main functions are: Claims Management: dealing with claims for compensation on behalf of the NHS in England. The bulk of our workload is handling negligence claims on behalf of the members of our indemnity schemes: NHS organisations and independent sector providers of NHS care in England and since April 2019, beneficiaries of state-backed indemnity for general practice; Practitioner Performance Advice: managing concerns raised about the performance of doctors, dentists and pharmacists; Primary Care Appeals: dealing with appeals and disputes between primary care contractors and NHS England; and Safety and Learning: helping providers of NHS care to understand their own claims risk profiles to target safety activity and share learning across the health service nationwide. Response to consultation Question: Do you agree that the proposed approach to oversight set out in this document meets the purposes and principles set out in section 2: 'Purpose and Principles'? If not, how could the proposed approach be improved? 1. NHS Resolution is supportive of the purpose and principles of NHS England/Improvement’s (NHSE/I) framework, particularly its plan to “provide an objective basis for decisions about when and how NHS England and NHS Improvement will intervene in cases where there are serious problems or risks to the quality of care”.1 2.