NHS England: Annual Report and Accounts 2019/20

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

NHS England: Annual Report and Accounts 2019/20 Our 2019 Annual 20 Report Health and high quality care for all, now and for future generations HC 1057 NHS England Annual Report and Accounts 2019/20 NHS England is legally constituted as the National Health Service Commissioning Board. Presented to Parliament pursuant to the National Health Service Act 2006 (as amended by the Health and Social Care Act 2012). Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed 28 January 2021. HC 1057 © Crown copyright 2020 This publication is licensed under the terms of the Open Government Licence v3.0 except where otherwise stated. To view this licence, visit nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3 Where we have identified any third party copyright information you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. This publication is available at www.gov.uk/official-documents Any enquiries regarding this publication should be sent to us at: NHS England and NHS Improvement, Quarry House, Quarry Hill, Leeds, LS2 7UE. ISBN 978-1-5286-1952-3 CCS0320331828 01/21 Printed on paper containing 75% recycled fibre content minimum Printed in the UK by the APS Group on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office Contents A view from Lord David Prior, Chair ................................................................ 7 About NHS England .......................................................................................... 10 Performance Report .......................................................................................... 13 Chief Executive’s overview ................................................................................. 14 Performance of Clinical Commissioning Groups ................................................. 17 Performance Overview ...................................................................................... 18 How we supported the wider NHS .................................................................... 26 Chief Financial Officer’s Report .......................................................................... 29 Our priorities for 2020/21 .................................................................................. 33 Accountability Report ....................................................................................... 35 Corporate Governance Report ........................................................................... 37 Board Committees ............................................................................................ 46 Statement of Accounting Officer’s responsibilities .............................................. 58 Governance statement ..................................................................................... 59 Remuneration and Staff Report ......................................................................... 84 Annual Accounts ............................................................................................... 117 Notes to the financial statements ...................................................................... 123 Appendices ........................................................................................................ 167 Appendix 1: How we have delivered against the Government’s Accountability Framework to the NHS ......................................... 168 Appendix 2: Public and patient contact and complaints ..................................... 172 Appendix 3: Meeting our Public Sector Equality Duty ......................................... 175 Appendix 4: Reducing health inequalities ........................................................... 178 Appendix 5: Working in partnership with people and communities .................... 182 Appendix 6: Sustainability ................................................................................. 186 Appendix 7: Glossary ....................................................................................... 188 A view from Lord David Prior, Chair I never had any doubt that the NHS would rise to the extraordinary challenge of coronavirus. In a crisis, the people who work for the NHS and within the NHS are magnificent. It is not overly hyperbolic to plagiarise the words of Winston Churchill after the Battle of Britain: “so much owed by so many to so few”. Who would have thought that the Nightingale hospitals could have been built in a matter of days? Who would have thought that hospitals could double critical care capacity? Who would have thought that a deliberately fragmented institutionalised structure could transform itself into an integrated system, the holy grail of healthcare so quickly? Who would have thought that we could cope with 32,000 hospitalised COVID-19 patients at one time? Who would have thought that 90% of GP practices would go virtual delivering more than 500,000 online consultations every week? And that in June alone the NHS could deliver over 1.6 million outpatient appointments remotely? It is truly remarkable that one of the world’s largest organisations showed itself so agile, so innovative and so ‘can do’. It was also humbling that many NHS staff left their families at home and came into work at a time that was scary for all. But that does not mean that everything in the garden is rosy. COVID-19 exposed many weaknesses, not just in the national and international response to the pandemic but more broadly. The health and care system is too fragmented. We have to move quickly to integrated care systems and this must include social care and care homes. Procurement and distribution processes were strained. The digital and data infrastructure responded well but we are a long way from embedding digital into our normal way of working. Laboratory capacity had to be scaled. Finally, the disproportionate impact of COVID-19 on People from Black, Asian and minority ethnic backgrounds reveals again the unacceptable growing health inequality that shamefully disfigures nearly all western societies. Whilst COVID-19 has exposed weaknesses it also obscures a more profound issue. Healthcare systems across the developed world be they publicly funded, private or a mix of the two are under great stress. To put it simply, demand for treatment across the globe is growing faster than the funding to pay for it. So, the pressure to increase the value received from every pound spent will be relentless. Approaching this in a Gradgrindish kind of a way will not be the right solution. It is not penny pinching or traditional cost reduction that is needed but a much more profound transformation, this will require a far greater emphasis on keeping people healthy rather than treating people who are sick. It will mean giving citizens greater power over their own lives through giving them access to more insightful data about their health. It will mean new clinical pathways that, where appropriate, support people out of conventional healthcare settings in particular, it will mean treating more people outside hospitals. It will mean much earlier diagnosis for illnesses such as cancer. It will mean truly personalised medicine as we incorporate genomics into mainstream diagnosis and treatment. ANNUAL REPORT 2019/20 | 7 It will mean far more insightful personalised health predictions based on new methods such as polygenic risk scores, which combined with health data will enable effective population health management, as well as more informed – and therefore empowered - patients. It will mean better access to healthcare through digital means and better care as we incorporate continuous remote monitoring of many diseases. All this adds up to a paradigm shift in how healthcare is delivered: prediction, prevention, personalisation. And the only way to achieve this is through stepping up what we are already doing, bringing down the barriers between different parts of the NHS so we work together, and in the patient’s eye that means as one NHS. Only then can we truly start transforming the whole NHS to work better for patients after COVID-19. The NHS has long been seen as a good healthcare system and emblematic of British fairness and social justice, that will remain, but it has also been viewed as a cost rather than an investment. Increasingly, we should see the NHS as part of the UK’s economic recovery. The NHS is an anchor institution and that means as local employers, as the organisation which keeps the workforce healthy, and as often is the case the biggest physical estate in the many towns and cities across England, the NHS is at the centre of each local economy. That’s why it’s so important that we ramp up our capital spend to get our buildings in modern order – benefiting patients, staff and the local construction economy. It’s why we should be more open to innovation and support British businesses in export markets. We should work in partnership with pharmaceutical, biotech and medtech companies so we can get the latest drug devices and medicines to patients fast, keeping local communities healthier for longer, and so more productive. We should be a pioneer of digital health and digital therapeutics, partnering with local tech companies, experts and researchers. We must accelerate access to the NHS, encourage uptake of new products and encourage innovation. We should work hand in hand with our great research institutes and universities, one of the brightest feathers in the UK’s cap. With their research excellence, a unique data set and our ability to trial and test new methods of healthcare we can be the health research centre of the world. The RECOVERY trials have set a new standard
Recommended publications
  • Response from NHS Digital
    1 Trevelyan Square Boar Lane Leeds LS1 6AE FAO: Joanne Andrews North East Kent Coroners Cantium House Country Hall Sandling Road Maidstone Kent ME14 1XD By Email Only: [email protected] Your ref: Our ref: 4 February 2021 Dear Ms Andrews Inquest into the death of Mr Ronald Richard Tilley I am writing in response to the Regulation 28 report received from HM Coroner dated 4 December 2020. This follows the death of Ronald Richard Tilley, who sadly died on 23 October 2019. This was followed by an investigation and inquest which concluded on 29 October 2020. I would like to express my sincerest condolences to Mr Tilley’s family. NHS Digital provided written statements in advance of the inquest, but did not attend the inquest. NHS Digital is a non-departmental public body created by the Health and Social Care Act 2012 and is the national information and technology partner for the health and care system. We use technology to support the NHS and social care. NHS Digital operates and maintains the Personal Demographics Service (‘PDS’) under the Spine Services No.2 Directions issued by the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care to maintain a register of NHS patients in England. PDS is the national electronic database of NHS patient details such as name, address, date of birth and NHS Number (known as demographic data). It also records the primary care registration (i.e. the GP practice with which the patient is registered for general medical services1) held by each registered patient and as notified through other NHS systems.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report and Accounts 2017/18
    !""#$%&'()*'+&$",&$--*#"+.&/012314& &&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&5#6$"&78..#(&!#+9*'8+:&&& ! ! & & & & & & & & & & & & Annual report and accounts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
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report
    Our 2018/19 Annual Report Health and high quality care for all, now and for future generations HC 2293 NHS England Annual Report and Accounts 2018/19 NHS England is legally referred to as the National Health Service Commissioning Board. Presented to Parliament pursuant to the National Health Service Act 2006 (as amended by the Health and Social Care Act 2012). Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed 11 July 2019 HC 2293 © Crown copyright 2019 This publication is licensed under the terms of the Open Government Licence v3.0 except where otherwise stated. To view this licence, visit nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3 Where we have identified any third party copyright information you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. This publication is available at www.gov.uk/official-documents Any enquiries regarding this publication should be sent to us at: NHS England, Quarry House, Quarry Hill, Leeds, LS2 7UE. ISBN 978-1-5286-1036-0 CCS0219647926 07/19 Printed on paper containing 75% recycled fibre content minimum Printed in the UK by the APS Group on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office Contents A view from Lord David Prior, Chair ............................................................................7 About NHS England ......................................................................................................9 Performance Report ......................................................................................................13 Chief Executive’s
    [Show full text]
  • Care Quality Commission
    A picture of the national audit office logo Report by the Comptroller and Auditor General Care Quality Commission Care Quality Commission – regulating health and social care HC 409 SESSION 2017–2019 13 OCTOBER 2017 Our vision is to help the nation spend wisely. Our public audit perspective helps Parliament hold government to account and improve public services. The National Audit Office scrutinises public spending for Parliament and is independent of government. The Comptroller and Auditor General (C&AG), Sir Amyas Morse KCB, is an Officer of the House of Commons and leads the NAO. The C&AG certifies the accounts of all government departments and many other public sector bodies. He has statutory authority to examine and report to Parliament on whether departments and the bodies they fund have used their resources efficiently, effectively, and with economy. Our studies evaluate the value for money of public spending, nationally and locally. Our recommendations and reports on good practice help government improve public services, and our work led to audited savings of £734 million in 2016. Care Quality Commission Care Quality Commission – regulating health and social care Report by the Comptroller and Auditor General Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed on 11 October 2017 This report has been prepared under Section 6 of the National Audit Act 1983 for presentation to the House of Commons in accordance with Section 9 of the Act Sir Amyas Morse KCB Comptroller and Auditor General National Audit Office 4 October 2017 HC 409 | £10.00 This report examines whether the Care Quality Commission is taking appropriate action to address the risks to people’s care.
    [Show full text]
  • Health Research Authority Board Meeting Agenda Part 1 – Public Session
    Page 1 of 63 HEALTH RESEARCH AUTHORITY BOARD MEETING AGENDA PART 1 – PUBLIC SESSION Date: Tuesday 24 July 2018 Time: 1.30pm – 3.15pm Venue: etc venues, Avonmouth House, 6 Avonmouth Street, London SE1 6NX Item Item details Time Attachment Page (mins) no 1. Apologies Verbal - Janet Messer Janet Wisely 2. Conflicts of interest Verbal - 3. Minutes of the last meeting 10 - 16 May 2018 A 4. Matters arising Verbal - Including: - HRA Annual Report and Accounts 2017-18 published 5. Update from Chair 5 Verbal - 6. Chief Executive update 10 To be tabled - 7. HRA Directorate update 5 To be tabled - 8. Transformation Programme update 10 B Including: - SIP Proportionality project 10 C 9. Update on progress of research transparency work 5 Verbal - 10. Pilot proposal for an HRA Accountable Centre Model for 15 D improvement evaluations Page 1 of 2 HRA Board Meeting Agenda – Part 1 (2018.07.24) Page 2 of 63 11. Finance report: April – June 2018 10 E Items for information 12. Annual Freedom of Information Report (2017/18) F 13. Annual Complaints Report (2017/18) G 14. Summary of 06.06.2018 Audit & Risk Committee meeting H 15. Out of session business conducted / External areas of Verbal interest since previous meeting 10 - Update regarding recruitment of Nick Hirst to support Research System Programme circulated 07 June 2018 - Statement issued by NIHR regarding Improving Performance in Initiating and Delivering Clinical Research circulated 07 June 2018 - Update regarding two studies to be published circulated 17 June 2018 16. Any other business 5 Verbal - (Any AOB items should be notified to the Head of Corporate Governance no later than 24 hours prior to the Board meeting barring exceptional circumstances) 17.
    [Show full text]
  • Saving and Improving Lives: the Future of UK Clinical Research Delivery
    Saving and Improving Lives: The Future of UK Clinical Research Delivery Published 23 March 2021 Saving and Improving Lives: The Future of UK Clinical Research Delivery Contents Ministerial foreword ....................................................................................................................... 3 The value of clinical research ....................................................................................................... 5 Our lifeline during COVID-19 ....................................................................................................... 5 Our opportunity to grow, adapt and improve ............................................................................... 6 Our hope for the future ................................................................................................................. 7 Our chance to help others ............................................................................................................ 8 Our time to act is now .................................................................................................................. 9 Our vision for UK clinical research delivery ............................................................................. 12 Clinical research delivery embedded in the NHS ...................................................................... 12 Patient-centred research ............................................................................................................ 12 Streamlined, efficient and innovative clinical
    [Show full text]
  • Clinical Negligence Cases in the English NHS: Uncertainty in Evidence As a Driver of Settlement Costs and Societal Outcomes
    Health Economics, Policy and Law (2021), page 1 of 16 doi:10.1017/S1744133121000177 ARTICLE Clinical negligence cases in the English NHS: uncertainty in evidence as a driver of settlement costs and societal outcomes Alexander W. Carter1* , Elias Mossialos1,2 , Julian Redhead3 and Vassilios Papalois3,4 1Department of Health Policy, London School of Economics & Political Science, London, UK, 2Institute of Global Health Innovation, Imperial College London, London, UK, 3Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK and 4Department of Surgery & Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK *Corresponding author. Email: [email protected] (Received 1 May 2020; revised 15 March 2021; accepted 17 March 2021) Abstract The cost of clinical negligence claims continues to rise, despite efforts to reduce this now ageing burden to the National Health Service (NHS) in England. From a welfarist perspective, reforms are needed to reduce avoidable harm to patients and to settle claims fairly for both claimants and society. Uncertainty in the estimation of quanta of damages, better known as financial settlements, is an important yet poorly char- acterised driver of societal outcomes. This reflects wider limitations to evidence informing clinical negli- gence policy, which has been discussed in recent literature. There is an acute need for practicable, evidence-based solutions that address clinical negligence issues, and these should complement long-stand- ing efforts to improve patient safety. Using 15 claim cases from one NHS Trust between 2004 and 2016, the quality of evidence informing claims was appraised using methods from evidence-based medicine. Most of the evidence informing clinical negligence claims was found to be the lowest quality possible (expert opinion).
    [Show full text]
  • UNDERSTANDING the NEW NHS a Guide for Everyone Working and Training Within the NHS 2 Contents 3
    England UNDERSTANDING THE NEW NHS A guide for everyone working and training within the NHS 2 Contents 3 NHS ENGLAND INFORMATION READER BOX Introduction 4 Directorate ◆ The NHS belongs to us all Medical Operations Patients and information Nursing Policy Commissioning development Foreword (Sir Bruce Keogh) 5 Finance Human resources NHS values 6 Publications Gateway Reference: 01486 ◆ NHS values and the NHS Constitution Document purpose Resources ◆ An overview of the Health and Social Care Act 2012 Document name Understanding The New NHS Structure of the NHS in England 8 Author NHS England ◆ The structure of the NHS in England Publication date 26 June 2014 ◆ Finance in the NHS: your questions answered Target audience Running the NHS 12 ◆ Commissioning in the NHS Additional circulation Clinicians working and training within the NHS, allied ◆ Delivering NHS services list health professionals, GPs ◆ Health and wellbeing in the NHS Description An updated guide on the structure and function of Monitoring the NHS 17 the NHS, taking into account the changes of the Health and Social Care Act 2012 ◆ Lessons learned and taking responsibility ◆ Regulation and monitoring in the NHS Action required None Contact details for Dr Felicity Taylor Working in the NHS 20 further information National Medical Director's Clinical ◆ Better training, better care Fellow, Medical Directorate Skipton House NHS leadership 21 80 London Road SE1 6LH ◆ Leading healthcare excellence www.england.nhs.uk/nhsguide/ Quality and innovation in the NHS 22 ◆ High-quality care for all Document status This is a controlled document. While this document may be printed, the The NHS in the United Kingdom 24 electronic version posted on the intranet is the controlled copy.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report and Accounts 2018/19 Human Tissue Authority
    Annual report and accounts 2018/19 Human Tissue Authority Annual report and accounts 2018/19 Annual report and accounts 2018/19 Human Tissue Authority Human Tissue Authority Annual report and accounts 2018/19 Presented to Parliament pursuant to Schedule 2(16) of the Human Tissue Act 2004. Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed on 27 June 2019 HC 2325 Annual report and accounts 2018/19 Human Tissue Authority © Human Tissue Authority copyright 2019 This publication is licensed under the terms of the Open Government Licence v3.0 except where otherwise stated. To view this licence, visit nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3. Where we have identified any third party copyright information you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. Any enquiries related to this publication should be sent to us at [email protected] This publication is available at www.gov.uk/official-documents ISBN 978-1-5286-1143-5 CCS0319877000 06/19 Printed on paper containing 75% recycled fibre content minimum Printed in the UK by the APS Group on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office Annual report and accounts 2018/19 Human Tissue Authority Contents Foreword 6 Performance 8 Overview ....................................................................................................................................... 9 Performance analysis ................................................................................................................ 16 Accountability 22 Corporate governance
    [Show full text]
  • Joint Framework: Commissioning and Regulating Together
    With support from NHS Clinical Commissioners Regulation of General Practice Programme Board Joint framework: Commissioning and regulating together A practical guide for staff January 2018 Publications Gateway Reference: 07488 Contents 1. This framework ..................................................................................................... 3 1.1 Purpose of the framework .................................................................................... 3 1.2 Who this framework is for ..................................................................................... 3 1.3 The Regulation of General Practice Programme Board ....................................... 4 1.4 Our principles ....................................................................................................... 4 1.5 Changing landscape of primary care .................................................................... 4 2. Collaborative working arrangements ................................................................. 6 2.1 Benefits of collaboration ....................................................................................... 6 2.2 Routine information sharing ................................................................................. 6 2.3 Local meetings ..................................................................................................... 8 2.4 Support for improvement ...................................................................................... 8 2.5 Emerging and urgent concerns (non-routine) ......................................................
    [Show full text]
  • NHS England's Responsibilities for Quality
    OFFICIAL Paper: PB.07.03.2018/10 NHS ENGLAND – BOARD PAPER Title: NHS England’s responsibilities for quality Lead Directors: Jane Cummings, Chief Nursing Officer Steve Powis, NHS England Medical Director Purpose of Paper: For Information This paper sets out NHS England’s functions relating to service quality. It outlines an initial map of the functions and processes in place, and how this translates into actions to improve service quality. The paper also suggests areas where we could ensure consistency of practice across these functions and the wider organisation, whilst recognising that our impending running cost cuts means overall we are going to have to do less, not more, as an organisation. The Board is invited to: Note the functions, processes and governance in place across the organisation, and how we work across NHS England in order to take action; and Note our work with NHSI and other ALBs to strengthen improvement capabilities across the NHS Page 1 of 14 OFFICIAL NHS England’s responsibilities for quality Purpose 1. This paper maps out NHS England’s formal functions relating to service quality. It gives an outline of the processes in place and how this translates into actions to improve service quality. The paper also suggests areas where we could ensure consistency of practice across these functions and the wider organisation. Background 2. The Health and Social Care Act 2012 states that NHS England has a duty to continually drive improvements in the quality of care across a comprehensive health service. Quality is defined in statute as having three dimensions: safety, clinical effectiveness and patient experience.
    [Show full text]
  • Methodological Challenges in Post-Licensure Vaccine Safety Studies Using Large Routinely Collected Datasets
    Methodological challenges in post-licensure vaccine safety studies using large routinely collected datasets by Julia Margaret Toffa-Stowe A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements of the Manchester Metropolitan University for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy by Published Work (Route 2) Manchester Metropolitan University 2017 Table of Contents 1. Abstract 2. Acknowledgments 3. Introduction 3.1 Vaccine safety concerns past and present 3.2 Routinely collected health data 3.3 Pre-Licensure 3.4 Post-Licensure 3.4.1 Signal detection 3.4.2 Signal Strengthening 3.4.3 Individual Causality Assessment 3.4.4 Hypothesis Testing 3.4.5 Statistical Methods 3.5 Ethical and Legal framework 3.6 Summary 4. Critical account of Published Works 4.1 Study 1: Intussusception / Rotavirus vaccination 4.2 Study 2: Narcolepsy in adults / Pandemic Influenza vaccine 4.3 Study 3: Convulsions / Pandemic and Seasonal Influenza vaccine 4.4 Study 4: Bacterial and Viral Infections / Measles Mumps and Rubella vaccine 4.5 Study 5: Guillain-Barré syndrome / Seasonal Influenza vaccine 4.6 Study 6: Idiopathic Thrombocytopenic Purpura / second dose of Measles Mumps and Rubella Vaccine 4.7 Study 7: Bell’s Palsy / Seasonal Influenza vaccine 5. Methodological Challenges in Post-Licensure Vaccine Safety Studies 5.1 Setting up the study 5.2 Study design and dealing with confounding 5.3 Case identification 5.4 Defining index data 5.5 Cleaning Data 5.6 Media attention 5.7 Validation 5.8 Publication 5.9 The communication of risk 6. Conclusions 7. Published works 8.
    [Show full text]