DOCSLIB.ORG

Shipman (2006)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Shipman (2006) A reprint from American Scientist the magazine of Sigma Xi, The Scientific Research Society This reprint is provided for personal and noncommercial use. For any other use, please send a request to Permissions, American Scientist, P.O. Box 13975, Research Triangle Park, NC, 27709, U.S.A., or by electronic mail to [email protected]. ©Sigma Xi, The Scientific Research Society and other rightsholders Marginalia Missing Links and Found Links Pat Shipman hough missing links are of- sion enhanced by its four-to-nine-foot Tten talked about, it’s the found In and out of the length. Its skeleton differs markedly ones that hold a special place in my from those of crocodiles or alligators, heart. Found links are fossils that il- though, despite the overall resemblance lustrate major transitions during evo- water, transitional in body shape. Tiktaalik’s front fins hold lutionary history. More than that, such the biggest surprise. Each was a sort of creatures offer unexpected glimpses of forms from the fossil half-fin, half-leg containing the bony the never-predictable twists and turns elements found in a limb—with a func- taken by evolution. Their discovery record illuminate tional wrist, elbow and shoulder—and and surprise bring sheer fun to pale- yet retaining the bony “rays” of a fish ontology and biology. the nuts and bolts of fin. According to team member Farish I have always loved the iconic Arch- Jenkins, Jr., of Harvard University, the aeopteryx, a beautiful fossil recognized evolution front fins were sturdy enough to sup- in 1860 that unmistakably combines port the creature in very shallow water features of two major groups of ani- or on land for brief trips. mals: birds and reptiles. The exquisite Its broad and robust ribs were imbri- feathered wings of Archaeopteryx bear Thomas Henry Huxley as stony proof cated, like tiles on a roof. They helped most unbirdlike claws; its birdlike of evolutionary theory. Decades later, to support the body on land and prob- skull contains an avian brain but car- Archaeopteryx was trumped by an ex- ably housed lungs to supplement the ries sharp reptilian teeth, not a beak; traordinary plethora of feathered di- gills. The presence of lungs is expect- and its feathered tail is underlain by nosaurs—some nonflying—that tell ed because many of the primitive fish a long bony tail typical of a small di- different stories about the evolution of in Tiktaalik’s ancestry had lungs for nosaur, not a bird. Still, the feathers avian features. gulping air at the water’s surface as and wings on these 150-million-year- well as gills. Soft tissues are rarely old fossils qualify Archaeopteryx for the Enter the Fishapod preserved in fossils, so the lack of title of First Bird. I am equally enamored of another fossilized lungs is unremarkable. Archaeopteryx is a found link in an- found link, the fossil skeleton of Tiktaa- With or without lungs, Tiktaalik was other sense, because the anatomy of lik roseae, described on April 6, 2006, in uniquely adapted to moving between this extraordinary species reveals how the journal Nature. Tiktaalik is a name land and water. creatures evolved from propelling suggested by the elders of the Nuna- “We were absolutely surprised at the themselves along solid substrates, such vut people, who live where the fossils features of the specimens,” Ted Dae- as the ground or tree limbs, to mov- were found on Ellesmere Island in the schler of the Academy of Natural Sci- ing through the air. It was a difficult Canadian Arctic; it means “large, shal- ences, co-leader of the team, told me. transition. Archaeopteryx fascinates me low-water fish.” This 375-million-year- “That is one of the beauties of this ma- in part because its anatomy is not that old fish shows a delicious combination terial. We knew the end points—fish of a skillful, modern bird, yet it com- of unexpected features, some inherit- at the beginning and tetrapods at the peted with contemporary pterodactyls, ed from its fishy ancestors and some end—but we could not have predicted which flew using different anatomical typical of later land-dwelling tetrapods the sequence in which those anatomi- structures. I often wonder why birds (four-footed animals). Neil Shubin of cal changes occurred.” Discovering survived and those wonderful ptero- the University of Chicago, co-leader of the unexpected is one of the joys of dactyls went extinct. the discovery team, jokingly calls the paleontology. At the time of its discovery, Archae- newly discovered species a “fishapod.” A dramatic change in habitat— opteryx was hailed by the anatomist Tiktaalik’s fins, gills, scales and primi- becoming a land animal when your an- tive jaw show it was a fish. Unlike fish cestors lived in water—required many Pat Shipman is an adjunct professor of anthropol- and like tetrapods, it had a distinct anatomical changes. Sturdy limbs re- ogy at the Pennsylvania State University. Address: neck, so its head moved independently placed flexible fins. New foods had to Department of Anthropology, 315 Carpenter Build- of its body. Its flattened head and broad be found, and new means of getting ing, Pennsylvania State University, University body make Tiktaalik look somewhat them had to be developed. In this case, Park, PA 16801. Internet: [email protected] like a weird, scaly crocodile, an impres- when Tiktaalik crawled up on land it © 2006 Sigma Xi, The Scientific Research Society. Reproduction www.americanscientist.org 2006 November–December 495 with permission only. Contact [email protected]. record of fossil whales. For example, Pakicetus is a 50-million-year-old spe- cies with whalelike teeth and a whale- like skull. Its skull possesses neither the anatomical adaptations for deep diving nor those for hearing underwa- ter as well as modern whales do, sug- gesting Pakicetus used both land and shallow water environments. Most of its skeleton is still unknown, but the part of its pelvis that is known shows aquatic adaptations. Whether or not its limbs and feet were adapted for land or sea won’t be known until a more complete specimen is found. Phil Gin- gerich of the Museum of Paleontol- Ted Daeschler/VIREO ogy at the University of Michigan has Tiktaalik’s broad, flat head had eye sockets on top of the skull, making it look a lot like a found remains of Pakicetus and many crocodile, even though the creature was covered in fishy scales and had gills. To the right other spectacular whale fossils. “We of the head are the reinforced ribs and sturdy forearms that Tiktaalik used to push itself up are looking for a skeleton of Pakicetus,” from the bottom of the pond or lake. he says with a grin, emphasizing the need for an intact specimen, “knowing probably preyed upon insects. Preda- but also reveals how this specific tran- that what we find might turn out to be tory fish in the past and present often sition from water to land occurred. quite different from what we expect.” suck aquatic food into their mouths This remarkable fossil shows us Slightly younger Rodhocetus was bet- using the same mechanism that pass- something else: that the transition was ter adapted to the water, with ankles es water across the gills. But Tiktaalik not an all-or-nothing affair. “Land” or like land mammals’ that were connect- does not have a bony gill cover, which “water” is too simple a dichotomy for ed to enlarged hind feet specialized for means there was less water flow over the realities of ecosystems. There are swimming. Its front feet retained land- the gills and a less effective sucking many habitats—swamps, or shallow, adapted hooves. mechanism. Too, its snout is longer plant-choked streams, or ponds that From 45 million years ago, the fos- than in its predatory ancestors. Both shrink seasonally and occasionally dry sil whale Dorudon had a less mobile of these changes suggest that Tiktaalik up—that require a range of adaptations (more fishlike) neck, front legs modi- was snapping up prey, perhaps from to both land and water. Tiktaalik may fied into flippers, vestigial hind legs the air, rather than gulping down prey have been at home in such places. and a powerful whale tail. Dorudon along with water. shows that foot-propelled swimming Eventually tetrapods left the water Longer and Longer Swims had been superseded by the tail-pro- and relied solely on lungs for respira- Tiktaalik’s discovery made me recon- pelled swimming that characterizes tion, abandoning their gills. By simply sider the much later and opposite tran- modern whales. The features of these being, Tiktaalik not only proves that sition—from land back to the sea— three species—plus those of a dozen such major adaptive changes occurred which is documented in the excellent other related species—can be used to sketch out the way in which land spe- cies returned to the sea and reevolved their aquatic adaptations, eventually evolving into whales. Both transitions, water-to-land and land-back-to-water, occurred in a mo- saic fashion and quite possibly used those intermediate habitats to which Tiktaalik is adapted. In fish and in whales, first the shape and design of Glyptolepis Sauripterus Eusthenopteron Panderichthys Tiktaalik Acanthostega Tulerpeton the head evolved, then the forelimbs and finally the hindlimbs and tail. Are these parallels meaningful or simply coincidental? Did other lineages pre- served in the far north evolve from a fishy life to a tetrapodal one in another way? Only more analysis and more Kalliopi Monoyios fossils will tell. This diagram shows a progression of anatomical changes in the forelimb from fish to tetrapod.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Nothing in Biology Makes Sense Except in the Light of Evolution: Pattern, Pro Cess, and the Evidence
    Nothing in Biology Makes Sense Except in the Light of Evolution: Pattern, Pro cess, and the Evidence Jonathan B. Losos Evolutionary biology is unusual: unlike any other science, evolution- ary biologists study a phenomenon that some people do not think exists. Consider chemistry, for example; it is unlikely that anyone does not believe in the existence of chemical reactions. Ditto for the laws of physics. Even within biology, no one believes that cells do not exist nor that DNA is a fraud. But public opinion polls consistently show that a majority of the American public is either unsure about or does not believe that life has evolved through time. For example, a Gallup poll taken repeatedly over the past twenty years indicates that as much as 40 percent of the population believes that the Bible is liter- ally correct. When I teach evolutionary biology, I focus on the ideas about how evolution works, rather than on the empirical record of how species have changed through time. However, for one lecture period I make an exception, and in some respects I consider this the most important lecture of the semester. Sad as I fi nd it to be, most of my students will not go on to become evolutionary biologists. Rather, they will become leaders in many diverse aspects of society: doctors, lawyers, business- people, clergy, and artists; people to whom others will look for guid- ance on matters of knowledge and science. For this reason, although I devote my course to a detailed understanding of the evolutionary pro cess, I consider it vitally important that my students understand why it is that almost all biologists fi nd the evidence that evolution has occurred— and continues to occur— to be overwhelming.
    [Show full text]
  • Tiktaalik: Reconstructed at Left Tetrapod Testimony
    Fa m i liar Fossils Tiktaalik fossil at right and Fossil site Tiktaalik: reconstructed at left Tetrapod Testimony IMAGINE a creature that looks like a crocodile with a neck but which also has gills like a fish! The stuff of nightmares, did you say? But it is just Tiktaalik roseae – a fish-like fossil that was introduced to the year old rocks. world on April 2006 by a team of researchers led by Neil They had a pretty Shubin, Edward Daeschler and Farish Jenkins, who clear idea about uncovered this bizarre specimen. It has been hailed as what sort of being the species that blurs the boundary between fish animal they were and the four-legged tetrapods. looking for. Tiktaalik was found on Ellesmere Island, Canada, However, success not too far from the North Pole in the Arctic Circle. It has was not been described as, “a cross between a fish and a crocodile.” immediate. It took It lived in the Devonian era lasting from 417m to 354m them five separate years ago. The name Tiktaalik is the Inuktitut word for expeditions to the freshwater fish burbot (Lota lota). The name was Canada before they suggested by Inuit elders of the area where the fossil was raised the discovered. The specific name roseae holds the clue to Tiktaalik. the name of an anonymous donor and is a tribute to the Tiktaalik was dubbed a “fishapod” by Daeschler. The person. media called it a “missing link” between fish and the Tiktaalik was a fish no doubt but a special one. Its four-legged tetrapods.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Pelvic Girdle and Pin of Eusthenopteron. by Edwin S
    PELVIC GIRDLE AND D'lN . OF EUSTHKNOPfERON. 311 On the Pelvic Girdle and Pin of Eusthenopteron. By Edwin S. Goodrich, M.A., Fellow of Mertoa College, Oxford. With Plate 16. 1 THROUGH the kindness of Mr. A. Smith Woodward, I have recently had the opportunity of looking through the fossil fish acquired by the British Museum since the Cata- logue was published. Amongst these was found a specimen of Eusthenopteron foordi, Whit., showing the endo- skeleton of the pelvic girdle and fin, of which I here give a description. The interest attaching to this fossil is con- siderable, since, of all the numerous extinct fish usually included in the group " Crossopterygii," it is the first and only one in which the parts of the skeleton of the pelvic girdle and its fin have been found complete and in their natural relations.2 The specimen (P. 6794) of which both the slab and the counterslab have been preserved, comes from the Upper Devonian of Canada. In it can be made out the skeleton of the pelvic girdle and fin of the right side, in a fairly com- plete and well-preserved condition, as represented in PI. 16, fig. 1, natural size. 1 To Mr. Smith Woodward I am also indebted for constant help when working in his Department. a The skeleton of the pelvic fin of Megalichthys has to some extent been made known by Cope, Miall, and Wellburn (2, 5, and 9), and the essential structure of that of Eusthenopteron has been briefly described by Traquair (7). VOL. 45, FART 2.—NEW SKKIES.
    [Show full text]
  • The Fish That Crawled out of the Water
    Published online 5 April 2006 | Nature | doi:10.1038/news060403-7 News The fish that crawled out of the water A newly found fossil links fish to land-lubbers. Rex Dalton A crucial fossil that shows how animals crawled out from the water, evolving from fish into land-loving animals, has been found in Canada. The creature, described today in Nature1,2, lived some 375 million years ago. Palaeontologists are calling the specimen from the Devonian a true 'missing link', as it helps to fill in a gap in our understanding of how fish developed legs for land mobility, before eventually evolving into modern animals including mankind. Several samples of the fish-like tetrapod, named Tiktaalik roseae, were “Tetrapods did not so much discovered by Edward Daeschler of the Academy of Natural Sciences in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, Neil Shubin of the University of Chicago in conquer the land, The fossilized remains of as escape from the Illinois, Farish Jenkins of Harvard University in Cambridge, Massachusetts Tiktaalik show a crocodile-like water.” and colleagues. creature with joints in its front arms. The crew found the samples in a river delta on Ellesmere Island in Arctic credit Ted Daeschler Canada; these included a near-complete front half of a fossilized skeleton of a crocodile-like creature, whose skull is some 20 centimetres long. The beast has bony scales and fins, but the front fins are on their way to becoming limbs; they have the internal skeletal structure of an arm, including elbows and wrists, but with fins instead of clear fingers. The team is still looking for more complete specimens to get a better picture of hind part of the animal.
    [Show full text]
  • A New Osteolepidid Fish From
    Rea. West. Aust. MU8. 1985, 12(3): 361-377 ANew Osteolepidid Fish from the Upper Devonian Gogo Formation, Western Australia J.A. Long* Abstract A new osteolepidid crossopterygian, Gogonasus andrewsi gen. et sp. nov., is des­ cribed from a single fronto-ethmoidal shield and associated ethmosphenoid, from the Late Devonian (Frasnian) Gogo Formation, Western Australia. Gogonasus is is distinguished from other osteolepids by the shape and proportions of the fronto­ ethmoidal shield, absence of palatal fenestrae, well developed basipterygoid pro­ cesses and moderately broad parasphenoid. The family Osteolepididae is found to be paraphyletic, with Gogonasus being regarded as a plesiomorphic osteolepidid at a similar level of organisation to Thursius. Introduction Much has been published on the well-preserved Late Devonian fish fauna from the Gogo Formation, Western Australia, although to date all the papers describing fish have been on placoderms (Miles 1971; Miles and Dennis 1979; Dennis and Miles 1979-1983; Young 1984), palaeoniscoids (Gardiner 1973, 1984; Gardiner and Bartram 1977) or dipnoans (Miles 1977; Campbell and Barwick 1982a, 1982b, 1983, 1984a). This paper describes the only osteolepiform from the fauna (Gardiner and Miles 1975), a small snout with associated braincase, ANU 21885, housed in the Geology Department, Australian National University. The specimen, collected by the Australian National University on the 1967 Gogo Expedition, was prepared by Dr S.M. Andrews (Royal Scottish Museum) and later returned to the ANU. Onychodus is the only other crossopterygian in the fauna. In its proportions and palatal structure the new specimen provides some additional new points of the anatomy of osteolepiforms. Few Devonian crossopte­ rygians are known from Australia, and so the specimen is significant in having resemblances to typical Northern Hemisphere species.
    [Show full text]
  • Early Tetrapod Relationships Revisited
    Biol. Rev. (2003), 78, pp. 251–345. f Cambridge Philosophical Society 251 DOI: 10.1017/S1464793102006103 Printed in the United Kingdom Early tetrapod relationships revisited MARCELLO RUTA1*, MICHAEL I. COATES1 and DONALD L. J. QUICKE2 1 The Department of Organismal Biology and Anatomy, The University of Chicago, 1027 East 57th Street, Chicago, IL 60637-1508, USA ([email protected]; [email protected]) 2 Department of Biology, Imperial College at Silwood Park, Ascot, Berkshire SL57PY, UK and Department of Entomology, The Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW75BD, UK ([email protected]) (Received 29 November 2001; revised 28 August 2002; accepted 2 September 2002) ABSTRACT In an attempt to investigate differences between the most widely discussed hypotheses of early tetrapod relation- ships, we assembled a new data matrix including 90 taxa coded for 319 cranial and postcranial characters. We have incorporated, where possible, original observations of numerous taxa spread throughout the major tetrapod clades. A stem-based (total-group) definition of Tetrapoda is preferred over apomorphy- and node-based (crown-group) definitions. This definition is operational, since it is based on a formal character analysis. A PAUP* search using a recently implemented version of the parsimony ratchet method yields 64 shortest trees. Differ- ences between these trees concern: (1) the internal relationships of aı¨stopods, the three selected species of which form a trichotomy; (2) the internal relationships of embolomeres, with Archeria
    [Show full text]
  • Center for Systematic Biology & Evolution
    CENTER FOR SYSTEMATIC BIOLOGY & EVOLUTION 2008 ACTIVITY REPORT BY THE NUMBERS Research Visitors ....................... 253 Student Visitors.......................... 230 Other Visitors.......................... 1,596 TOTAL....................... 2,079 Outgoing Loans.......................... 535 Specimens/Lots Loaned........... 6,851 Information Requests .............. 1,294 FIELD WORK Botany - Uruguay Diatoms – Russia (Commander Islands, Kamchatka, Magdan) Entomology – Arizona, Colorado, Florida, Hawaii, Lesotho, Minnesota, Mississippi, Mongolia, Namibia, New Jersey, New Mexico, Ohio, Pennsylvania, South Africa, Tennessee LMSE – Zambia Ornithology – Alaska, England Vertebrate Paleontology – Canada (Nunavut Territory), Pennsylvania PROPOSALS BOTANY . Digitization of Latin American, African and other type specimens of plants at the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, Global Plants Initiative (GPI), Mellon Foundation Award. DIATOMS . Algal Research and Ecologival Synthesis for the USGS National Water Quality Assessment (NAWQA) Program Cooperative Agreement 3. Co-PI with Don Charles (Patrick Center for Environmental Research, Phycology). Collaborative Research on Ecosystem Monitoring in the Russian Northern Far-East, Trust for Mutual Understanding Grant. CSBE Activity Report - 2008 . Diatoms of the Northcentral Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania Department of Conservation and Natural Resources, Wild Rescue Conservation Grant. Renovation and Computerization of the Diatom Herbarium at the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, National
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogeny of Basal Tetrapoda
    Stuart S. Sumida Biology 342 Phylogeny of Basal Tetrapoda The group of bony fishes that gave rise to land-dwelling vertebrates and their descendants (Tetrapoda, or colloquially, “tetrapods”) was the lobe-finned fishes, or Sarcopterygii. Sarcoptrygii includes coelacanths (which retain one living form, Latimeria), lungfish, and crossopterygians. The transition from sarcopterygian fishes to stem tetrapods proceeded through a series of groups – not all of which are included here. There was no sharp and distinct transition, rather it was a continuum from very tetrapod-like fishes to very fish-like tetrapods. SARCOPTERYGII – THE LOBE-FINNED FISHES Includes •Actinista (including Coelacanths) •Dipnoi (lungfishes) •Crossopterygii Crossopterygians include “tetrapods” – 4- legged land-dwelling vertebrates. The Actinista date back to the Devonian. They have very well developed lobed-fins. There remains one livnig representative of the group, the coelacanth, Latimeria chalumnae. A lungfish The Crossopterygii include numerous representatives, the best known of which include Eusthenopteron (pictured here) and Panderichthyes. Panderichthyids were the most tetrapod-like of the sarcopterygian fishes. Panderichthyes – note the lack of dorsal fine, but retention of tail fin. Coelacanths Lungfish Rhizodontids Eusthenopteron Panderichthyes Tiktaalik Ventastega Acanthostega Ichthyostega Tulerpeton Whatcheeria Pederpes More advanced amphibians Tiktaalik roseae – a lobe-finned fish intermediate between typical sarcopterygians and basal tetrapods. Mid to Late Devonian; 375 million years old. The back end of Tiktaalik’s skull is intermediate between fishes and tetrapods. Tiktaalik is a fish with wrist bones, yet still retaining fin rays. The posture of Tiktaalik’s fin/limb is intermediate between that of fishes an tetrapods. Coelacanths Lungfish Rhizodontids Eusthenopteron Panderichthyes Tiktaalik Ventastega Acanthostega Ichthyostega Tulerpeton Whatcheeria Pederpes More advanced amphibians Reconstructions of the basal tetrapod Ventastega.
    [Show full text]
  • Terrestrial-Style Feeding in a Very Early Aquatic Tetrapod Is Supported by Evidence from Experimental Analysis of Suture Morphology
    Terrestrial-style feeding in a very early aquatic tetrapod is supported by evidence from experimental analysis of suture morphology Molly J. Markey*† and Charles R. Marshall*‡ *Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences and ‡Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology and Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University, 26 Oxford Street, Cambridge, MA 02138 Communicated by Andrew H. Knoll, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, March 6, 2007 (received for review September 25, 2006) There is no consensus on when in the fish-tetrapod transition stega, captured prey using suction or biting (15). Specifically, the suction feeding, the primary method of prey capture in the aquatic fishes Eusthenopteron, Panderichthys, and Tiktaalik, and the early realm, evolved into the direct biting on prey typical of terrestrial tetrapod Ventastega, all possess large coronoid fangs, whereas animals. Here, we show that differences in the morphology of se- these teeth are absent in the more derived Acanthostega.In lected cranial sutures between species that span the fish–tetrapod addition, Eusthenopteron and Panderichthys both exhibit an transition (the Devonian osteolepiform fish Eusthenopteron, the ossified operculum, whereas the bony gill cover is lost in aquatic Devonian tetrapod Acanthostega, and the Permian terres- Tiktaalik, Ventastega, and Acanthostega. Finally, the glenoid fossa trial tetrapod Phonerpeton) can be used to infer when terrestrial of the articular faces posteriordorsally in the fish taxa discussed feeding first appeared. Our approach consists of defining a sutural here (Eusthenopteron, Panderichthys, and Tiktaalik) whereas, in morphospace, assigning functional fields to that morphospace the tetrapods Ventastega and Acanthostega, this fossa points based on our previous measurements of suture function made dorsally, indicating that the lower jaw changed the nature of its during feeding in the living fish Polypterus, inferring the functions articulation to the skull across the fish–tetrapod transition.
    [Show full text]
  • Teacher's Guide: Tiktaalik: a Fish out of Water
    Teacher’s Guide: Tiktaalik: A Fish Out of Water Recommended Grade Level: 5–8 (also applicable to grades 9–12 for students requiring significant support in learning) Suggested Time: About 50–60 minutes spread over one or more class periods, plus additional time to complete a writing assignment Goals Vocabulary Following are the big ideas that students • fossil should take away after completing this lesson: • characteristic • Transitional fossils help scientists establish • transition how living things are related • tetrapod • Physical features and behaviors may • species change over time to help living things sur- vive where they live • amphibian • evolution Key Literacy Strategies Following are the primary literacy strategies students will use to complete this activity: • Categorizing basic facts and ideas (screen 10) • Making inferences (screens 4 and 7, writing assignment 2) • Identifying and using text features (screens 4, 6, and 9) • Determining important information (screen 7, writing assignment 1) • Sequencing events (screen 9) Note: In addition to using the key literacy strategies listed above, students will use each of the strategies below to complete this lesson: • Monitoring comprehension • Synthesizing • Making predictions • Developing vocabulary • Connecting prior knowledge to new learning • Developing a topic in writing • Identifying and using text features (photographs, captions, diagrams, and/or maps) Overview Tiktaalik: A Fish Out of Water is a student-directed learning experience. However, while students are expected to work through the lesson on their own, teachers should be available to keep the lesson on track, organize groupings, facilitate discussions, answer questions, and ensure that all learning goals are met. Teacher’s Guide: Tiktaalik: A Fish Out of Water 1 The following is a summary of the lesson screens: Screen 1: Students learn that they will explore evolutionary relationships between animal groups that do not appear to be related.
    [Show full text]
  • Farish A. Jenkins Jr (1940–2012) Palaeontologist, Anatomist, Explorer and Artist
    COMMENT OBITUARY Farish A. Jenkins Jr (1940–2012) Palaeontologist, anatomist, explorer and artist. ith a rifle strapped to his back nearly a century’s worth of speculation about a serendipitous expansion of his research each summer, a scalpel in his functional anatomy that had been based on programme to include other tetrapod hand each autumn and the eyes fossils alone. groups. In the 1990s and 2000s, Jenkins used Wof an artist throughout the year, Farish Jenkins’s research output was as systematic the same approach to open up the Triassic Jenkins Jr seamlessly blended expeditionary as his military training had been. During the rocks of Greenland and the Devonian palaeontology with experimental sediments of Arctic Canada to anatomy to establish how animals palaeontological discovery. He evolved to walk, run, jump and fly. uncovered haramiyids (some of the Jenkins, who died of com- earliest mammals) in the Triassic plications from pneumonia on rocks and Tiktaalik (a genus of lobe- 11 November, was raised in Rye, finned fish) in the Devonian ones. New York. As a child, he showed Jenkins was president of the no obvious draw towards a life of Society of Vertebrate Paleontology science and exploration. But two in 1981–82, and he received its experiences transformed him. While Romer-Simpson Medal for life- S. KREITER/BOSTON GLOBE VIA GETTY VIA GETTY GLOBE S. KREITER/BOSTON studying philosophy at Princeton time achievement in 2009. He will University in New Jersey in the early be remembered by generations 1960s, Jenkins spent a summer as an of undergraduates, graduate and undergraduate assistant to Glenn medical students and assistant Lowell Jepsen.
    [Show full text]
  • From Sea to Slime: Evolution of Amphibians Late Devonian: Rhipidistians an Important Link: Tooth Structure Skeletal Modification
    Late Devonian: Rhipidistians From Sea to Slime: Evolution of Amphibians Lungs were developed in two groups of lobe-finned fishes - Rhipidistians and lungfishes . The Rhipidistians are considered to be the ultimate ancestors of later land animals. Rhipidistians such as Eusthenopteron had evolved "land animal-like features": Eusthenopteron Skeletal Modifications An Important Link: Tooth Structure Labyrinthodont tooth Labyrinthodont tooth of Rhipidistian fish of early amphibian (Eusthenopteron) (Archegosaurus) Labyrinthodont tooth structure (with complexly infolded enamel) is shared between Rhipidistian fishes and the earliest amphibians. This strongly supports a close relationship between the two groups. 1 Late Devonian: Ichthyostega and Acanthostega -Ichthyostega was a cross between a fish and an amphibian -Ichthyostega had legs and walked and was a true tetrapod. -With true legs, it could live on land for extended periods. -The primitive amphibians like Ichthyostega had a special kind of skin that helped them retain bodily fluids and deter desiccation. -Stronger skeletons allowed the primitive amphibians to live more comfortably with the increased gravity on land. -Animals like Ichthyostega used their limbs for locomotion and their tails for balance. Ichthyostega Carboniferous to Permian Evolution of neck and ear · Amphibian nostrils became increasingly functional for breathing air. · Amphibians evolved "hands" and "feet" with five digits. · Amphibian tails became reduced in size. · Amphibian backbones grew stronger (this enabled amphibian bodies to grow bigger). · Amphibians obtained eardrums. -Fishes need limbs to support bodies and ears to hear sounds in the air. -Fins changed to limbs -Several bones of the skull changed to the shoulder bones -Tongue cartilage (part of the jaw in fish) became an ear bone.
    [Show full text]