DOCSLIB.ORG

Messrs Bowe, Land Adjacent to Elizabeth Terrace

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Messrs Bowe, Land Adjacent to Elizabeth Terrace MESSRS BOWE, LAND ADJACENT TO ELIZABETH TERRACE, WHITEHAVEN, CUMBRIA HERITAGE IMPACT ASSESSMENT February 2017 Wardell Armstrong Cocklakes Yard, Carlisle, Cumbria CA4 0BQ, United Kingdom Telephone: +44 (0)1228 564820 Fax: +44(0)1228 560025 www.wa‐archaeology.com DATE ISSUED: February 2017 JOB NUMBER: CL11940 OASIS REFERENCE: wardella2‐275258 REPORT NUMBER: RPT‐001 GRID REFERENCE: NX 98575 19111 MESSRS BOWE LAND ADJACENT TO ELIZABETH CRESCENT, WHITEHAVEN, CUMBRIA HERITAGE IMPACT ASSESSMENT February 2017 PREPARED BY: EDITED BY: APPROVED BY: Cat Peters Richard Newman Frank Giecco Researcher Project Manager Technical Director This report has been prepared by Wardell Armstrong with all reasonable skill, care and diligence, within the terms of the Contract with the Client. The report is confidential to the Client and Wardell Armstrong accepts no responsibility of whatever nature to third parties to whom this report may be made known. No part of this document may be reproduced without the prior written approval of Wardell Armstrong. DESK BASED ASSESSMENTS ARCHAEOLOGICAL EVALUATION ARCHAEOLOGICAL EXCAVATION Wardell Armstrong is the trading name of Wardell Armstrong LLP, Registered in England No. OC307138. GEOPHYSICAL SURVEY Registered office: Sir Henry Doulton House, Forge Lane, Etruria, Stoke‐on‐Trent, ST1 5BD, United Kingdom TOPOGRAPHIC AND LANDSCAPE SURVEY HISTORIC BUILDING RECORDING UK Offices: Stoke‐on‐Trent, Cardiff, Carlisle, Edinburgh, Greater Manchester, London, Newcastle upon Tyne, Sheffield, Taunton, Truro, West Bromwich. International Offices: Almaty, Moscow ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES Messrs Bowe Elizabeth Crescent, Whitehaven Heritage Impact Assessment CONTENTS SUMMARY .................................................................................................................................. 1 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .............................................................................................................. 2 1 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................. 3 1.1 Circumstances of Project ............................................................................................ 3 1.2 The Purpose of the Heritage Impact Assessment ..................................................... 3 1.3 National Planning Policy and Legislative Framework ............................................... 3 1.4 Local Planning Policies ................................................................................................ 4 2 METHODOLOGY .................................................................................................................. 5 2.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................ 5 2.2 Documentary Sources ................................................................................................ 5 2.3 Site Visit ...................................................................................................................... 5 2.4 Impact Assessment Tables ......................................................................................... 5 2.5 Heritage Impact Assessment ...................................................................................... 6 2.6 Reporting .................................................................................................................... 7 2.7 Glossary ....................................................................................................................... 7 3 DESCRIPTION ...................................................................................................................... 8 3.1 Location and Geology ................................................................................................. 8 3.2 Historic Landscape Character ..................................................................................... 8 3.3 Archaeological and Historical Background ................................................................ 8 3.4 Previous Archaeological Works ................................................................................ 18 3.5 Designated Heritage Assets ...................................................................................... 18 3.6 Undesignated Heritage Assets ................................................................................. 18 3.7 The Character of the Development ......................................................................... 18 4 SITE VISIT .......................................................................................................................... 20 5 DISCUSSION ...................................................................................................................... 24 5.1 Summary of Heritage Asset Significance ................................................................. 24 5.2 Magnitude of Impact on Heritage Assets ................................................................ 24 5.3 Heritage Statement .................................................................................................. 25 6 BIBLIOGRAPHY .................................................................................................................. 26 6.1 Primary Sources ........................................................................................................ 26 6.2 Secondary Sources .................................................................................................... 27 6.3 Internet Sources ....................................................................................................... 28 6.4 Other Sources ........................................................................................................... 29 APPENDIX 1: HERITAGE IMPACT ASSESSMENT TABLES ........................................................... 30 CL11940/RPT‐001 February 2017 Messrs Bowe Elizabeth Crescent, Whitehaven Heritage Impact Assessment APPENDIX 2: LIST OF HERITAGE ASSETS .................................................................................. 33 APPENDIX 3: FIGURES .............................................................................................................. 39 LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS FIGURES Figure 1: Site location Figure 2: Detailed site location Figure 3: Location of heritage assets within an 800m radius of the study area Figure 4: Hodskinson and Donald’s Plan of Cumberland, 1774 Figure 5: Plan of Akebank Tenement and Harras Park, nd Figure 6: Plan of Harris Park, c. 1810 Figure 7: Wood’s Plan of the Borough of Whitehaven, 1830 Figure 8: Creighton’s Plan of Whitehaven, 1835 Figure 9: First Edition Ordnance Survey Map, 1863 Figure 10: Brodie’s Plan of the Parliamentary and Municipal Borough of Whitehaven, 1894 Figure 11: Second Edition Ordnance Survey Map, 1899 Figure 12: Third Ordnance Survey Map, 1925 Figure 13: Ordnance Survey Map, 1962 PLATES Plate 1: RCHME Prospect of Whitehaven from the Sea by Jan Wyck, 1686 10 Plate 2: Read’s View of Whitehaven Port, c. 1715 (after Burkett 1995) 11 Plate 3: Google Earth imagery, 31st December 2003 18 Plate 4: General view of site from Scilly Bank to the east, facing west 20 Plate 5: Public footpath to the east of the site, facing north‐north‐east 21 Plate 6: Eastern set of gate stoops, facing north‐west 21 Plate 7: Western set of gate stoops, facing south 22 Plate 8: Eastern stone gate stoop, facing east 22 Plate 9: Western stone gate stoop, facing east 22 Plate 10: Southern field boundary from south‐east of site, facing west‐north‐west 23 Plate 11: Southern field boundary from western extent of site, facing south‐east 23 CL11940/RPT‐001 February 2017 Messrs Bowe Elizabeth Crescent, Whitehaven Heritage Impact Assessment SUMMARY Wardell Armstrong was commissioned by Messrs Bowe to undertake a Heritage Impact Assessment for land adjacent to Elizabeth Crescent, Whitehaven (NGR: NX 98575 19111) to support a planning application for a development at the site. This work comprised a consultation of sources relating to the area’s development and a site visit. This Heritage Impact Assessment summarised the results of the research and site visit. This Heritage Impact Assessment is designed to show the impact on the heritage significance of upstanding heritage assets within the 800m study area, and the potential for encountering as‐yet unknown heritage assets within the site boundary. The proposed development site has been found to lie within agricultural land associated with Harras Park Farm. During the mid to late 18th century, the wider environs was exploited by Sir James Lowther’s Whingill mining landscape, and six associated pits with adjoining waggonways and quarries dotting the area. At around this time, the land was reorganised into smaller fields, and a former field boundary dating to this period once lay within the proposed development site. Before this, the land was known as Harras Park, an area consisting of ten plots of land, the proposed development site being within a plot known as ‘Long Rush’. Harras Park originated as a tract of land associated with Holme Cultram Abbey. It was a grange in existence by 1220 as a monastic grange, and it could be that the present Harras Park Farm is on the site of the foundation. The present southern boundary of the proposed development site, a typical Cumbrian kest, has been found to have traces dating back to at least the late 17th century, and may be of medieval origin. This study found that a development within the site boundary would
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Biographies of St. James Vicars (Whitehaven)
    ST. JAMES VICARS BIOGRAPHIES Parish of Whitehaven Publication HS 9 RICHARD ARMITSTEAD Vicar 1790 to 1821 Richard Armitstead was baptised on 20 th January 1766 at Arncliffe St. Oswald’s, North Yorkshire- the second son of Marmaduke Armitstead-a plebian (or commoner). Marmaduke was baptized at Arncliffe on 9th October 1735 (the son of John and Agnes), and was buried on 25 th June 1811 having died on 21 st June. The first child was John (baptized 15 th May 1764, died 1789 4), and later children were Agnes (19 th July 1767), James (2 nd February 1769, died 1708), and Elizabeth (9 th March 1777). Marmaduke had married a Mary Savage of Bolton Percy (SW of York) in 1763 or 1764- the Marriage Bond is dated 10 th March 1763. At the time of the bond being issued Mary was 21, 5 years younger than Marmaduke. The Armitsteads were an old yeoman family from the Craven District of the West Riding of Yorkshire, both Richard’s father and grandfather lived at Litton Hall. It is believed that he attended Ermysted’s Grammar School, Skipton (after an early education at the Village School)- but the records are insufficient to prove that. 1 Litton Hall had been leased by Marmaduke’s father, who had also owned New House Farm at Halton Gill. Marmaduke and Mary lived at Prospect House, Arncliffe (near the Falcon Inn). Marmaduke’s brother, Richard, built Armistead Farm at Litton in 1734 Nothing is known of his early life, but he matriculated to Queens College, Oxford as a batter on 25 th June 1784.
    [Show full text]
  • Pinfold Listings. Condition: C = Complete Or Substantially Complete; P = Partial Remains and Recognisable; S = Site Only Identified; NF = Site Not Found
    Pinfold Listings. Condition: C = Complete or substantially complete; P = Partial remains and recognisable; S = Site only identified; NF = Site not found. Ordnance Survey grid reference X and Y coordinates given. For a 6 digit grid reference read 317391, 5506847 as 173506. Or enter 12 digit reference as shown in www.old-maps.co.uk or www.streetmap.co.uk Location & Description. C Abbey Town Pound, Wigton. Grid ref: 317391,5506847 It is located on the left approaching Abbey Town from the south on the B5302, at the far end of a row of terraced houses. This is a stone pound with triangular capping stones and a small iron gate with overhead lintel. In good order, now used as a garden and approx. 10mtrs by 7mtrs. The south corner has been removed and wall rebuilt probably to give rear access to the row of houses. It is shown on the 1866 OS 1:2500 map, as a pound in the corner of a field. No buildings are shown. A date stone on the adjacent row of houses indicates they were built in 1887 and the removal of the south corner of the pinfold probably occurred then. S Ainstable Pinfold, Penrith. No trace. Grid ref: 352581,546414. Shown as a Pinfold on the 1868 OS 1:10,560 map. The road has been widened at the site and the pinfold has been lost. NF Ambleside. No trace. Grid ref: 337700,504600. Possible site is where Pinfold Garage is now built. No trace found on OS maps. S Anthorn Bridge Pinfold, Wigton. No trace.
    [Show full text]
  • Musgrave Church Field Great Musgrave, Cumbria
    Wardell Armstrong Archaeology Limited Cocklakes Yard, Carlisle, Cumbria CA4 0BQ, United Kingdom Telephone: +44 (0)1228 564820 Fax: +44(0)1228 560025 www.wa-archaeology.com MUSGRAVE CHURCH FIELD GREAT MUSGRAVE, CUMBRIA GEOPHYSICAL SURVEY REPORT Wardell Armstrong Archaeology Limited Cocklakes Yard, Carlisle, Cumbria CA4 0BQ, United Kingdom Telephone: +44 (0)1228 564820 Fax: +44(0)1228 560025 www.wa-archaeology.com DATE ISSUED: September 2014 JOB NUMBER: CP10612 GRID REFERENCE: NY 7664 1323 MUSGRAVE CHURCH FIELD TRUST MUSGRAVE CHURCH FIELD, GREAT MUSGRAVE, CUMBRIA GEOPHYSICAL SURVEY REPORT PREPARED BY: Martin Railton Senior Project Manager APPROVED BY: Frank Giecco Technical Director This report has been prepared by Wardell Armstrong Archaeology with all reasonable skill, care and diligence, within the terms of the Contract with the Client. The report is confidential to the Client and Wardell Armstrong Archaeology accepts no responsibility of whatever nature to third parties to whom this report may be made known. No part of this document may be reproduced without the prior written approval of Wardell Armstrong Archaeology. MUSGRAVE CHURCH FIELD, GREAT MUSGRAVE, CUMBRIA: GEOPHYSICAL SURVEY © WAA OCT-2014 CONTENTS SUMMARY................................................................................................................................. 5 1 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................. 6 1.1 Circumstances of the Project (Figure 1)..............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Cumberland. Mosser
    DIRECTORY.] CUMBERLAND. MOSSER. 219 betn tr.ansferred by \he owner, Mrs. Bragg, of London, fants ; Miss Eliza Graham, mistress ; Mrs. Elizabeth to a body of trustees, as both are voluntary Church Renwick, infants' mistress of England schools, & the rector of the parish i5 chair­ Railway Station, Parton, Jn. Jsph. Taylor, station master man of the trustees ; the schools will hold II6 girls & Carriers to Whitehaven.-William Corlett, Thomas 107 infants : average attendance, 107 girls & 94 in- Bewsher & John Hodgson, tues. thurs. k sat MORESBY. Cleator Moor Co-{)perative Society Bewsher Thomas, carrier Limited, Moresby parks Brown Joseph Wm. draper & tailor Marked thus * should be addressed Parton, Whitehaven. Haggerty A.lex. farmer, The High Carruthers Frances .Ann (Mrs.), Sta- Hl.<nter John, assistant overseer & tion inn (For names in Lonsdale Place, see clerk to Parish Council, 23 Moresby Carrnthers John, Bugle inn, Main st Whitehaven.) parki Cleator Moor Co-operative SocietyLtd PRIVATE RESIDENTS. Hunter John, butcher, Howg-ate Corlett John & Joshua, grocers, Post Allen Rev. Hubert John B.A..(rector), Kend~.ll Richard, farm bailiff to Mrs. office Rectory Burnyeat, Common gate Corlett William, carrier Burnyeat William J.P. Mill grove Mitchell Edward, farmer, Bonny Davidson Thos. builder, Pulsford ho Burnyeat William John Dalzell J.P. Moresby Coal Company Ltd. (William Dick Catherine (Mrs.), shopkeeper, Moresby house 1 Graham, sec.), Wall Mill colliery. Main street Graham William, Solway house 1 T A "Moresby, Whitehaven" Fisher Isaac, Ship inn Gunn Peter, View Firth Moresby Parks Reading Room (Thos. Graham Margaret (Mrs.), Lowther Jackson Lieut.-Col. John ArthurM.P., Morton, sec.), Moresby parks Arms P.H J.P.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Monitoring Report 2013/2014
    Allerdale Local Development Framework Annual Monitoring Report 2013/14 January 2015 Annual Monitoring Report 2013/2014 Contents 1 Introduction ......................................................................................................... 1 2 Allerdale Local Plan – Objectives and Targets .................................................... 3 3 Progress of the new Allerdale Local Plan ............................................................ 6 4 Indicators ............................................................................................................ 9 5 Population and Housing .................................................................................... 10 6 Economy ........................................................................................................... 19 7 Environment ...................................................................................................... 26 8 Future arrangements ......................................................................................... 30 Appendix 1: Housing Land Supply Statement .......................................................... 32 Appendix 2: Statement of Compliance - the Duty to Co-operate and update ........... 50 Allerdale Borough Council January 2015 Annual Monitoring Report 2013/2014 1 Introduction Background 1.1 This Annual Monitoring Report (AMR) has been produced by Allerdale Borough Council covering the period from 1 April 2013 to 31 March 2014. 1.2 The AMR reports on a number of monitoring statistics, including progress
    [Show full text]
  • LD299 Allerdale Borough Council Annual Monitoring Report 2013
    Allerdale Local Development Framework Annual Monitoring Report 2013/14 January 2015 Annual Monitoring Report 2013/2014 Contents 1 Introduction ......................................................................................................... 1 2 Allerdale Local Plan – Objectives and Targets .................................................... 3 3 Progress of the new Allerdale Local Plan ............................................................ 6 4 Indicators ............................................................................................................ 9 5 Population and Housing .................................................................................... 10 6 Economy ........................................................................................................... 19 7 Environment ...................................................................................................... 26 8 Future arrangements ......................................................................................... 30 Appendix 1: Housing Land Supply Statement .......................................................... 32 Appendix 2: Statement of Compliance - the Duty to Co-operate and update ........... 50 Allerdale Borough Council January 2015 Annual Monitoring Report 2013/2014 1 Introduction Background 1.1 This Annual Monitoring Report (AMR) has been produced by Allerdale Borough Council covering the period from 1 April 2013 to 31 March 2014. 1.2 The AMR reports on a number of monitoring statistics, including progress
    [Show full text]
  • Whitehaven Consultation Document
    Whitehaven Cycling and Walking Have your say Consultation Public Consultation from: 14 July to 6 August 2021 For more details and links to the questionnaire please visit: cumbria.gov.uk/ cyclingandwalking 31% of people in the Whitehaven area travel less than 5km to work, compared to the national average of 35%. 15% of people in the Whitehaven area travel less than 2km to work, compared to the national average of 17%. 2% of people in the Whitehaven area cycle to work, compared to the national average of 3%. 7% of people in the Whitehaven area walk to work, compared to the national average of 11%. 83% of the internal trips in the Whitehaven area are made by car. 19% of children in the Copeland District walk to school compared to the County average of 35%. <1% of children in the Copeland District cycle to school compared to the County average of 2%. Whitehaven Cycling and Walking Consultation Summary We are holding a consultation on proposals to improve the cycling and walking network in Whitehaven and the surrounding area, to promote more active travel and to make everyone feel confident they can walk or cycle. The consultation focusses on shorter urban journeys in Whitehaven, but we also welcome feedback on journeys to and from surrounding communities. Details of the proposed routes are included in this consultation document. We want you to provide feedback on these proposals so we can develop the best possible Local Cycling and Walking Infrastructure Plan for Whitehaven. Please take the time to get involved, read this consultation document and provide your feedback.
    [Show full text]
  • Euriskodata Rare Book Series
    >id£ik^ \./ h0k^ ^!5w-u»w' '^^4:r*€> %. < #'\ \^4--^ / 0f§^ ..# V THE NORTHMEN IN CUMBERLAND & WESTMORELAND BY ROBERT FERGUSON. XiOlsrJDOlT: liO aiT O aye -A- IT -A.25TX) CO CJ^TtXiXSTj^z It. & J. STEEL. 1866. •. }tia\ h^i^^^ prefacf;. The present little work owes its origin to an attempt to present, in the form of a popular lecture, such of the " leading facts contained in Mr. Worsaae's Danes and " Norwegians in England as might be supposed to be more particularly interesting to a Cumberland audience. The slight investigation consequent upon this under- taking convinced the author that the mine was worth working deeper, and an increasing interest in the sub- ject led him on till the extent of his researches appeared to him to be such as to warrant him in giving them to the public. He is fully aware that a work like the present, which is to a great extent etymological, must of necessity contain much that is more or less conjectural, and has endeavoured, as far as possible, to avoid dogmatism, and to qualify the expression of his opinion according to the circumstances of the case. At an early period of his enquiry he was led to form the theory of an immigi'ation more particularly Nor- wegian proceeding from the western side of the island, and a part of his object has been to lay before the PRONUNCIATION OF OLD NORSE. In order to enable the reader to understand the derivations in the following: pages, it is indispensable for him to pay a little attention to the pronunciation of Old Norse.
    [Show full text]
  • Lonsdale Battalion, Subject Themed Listing of Archive Contents 1914-1915
    Cumbria Archive Service The Lonsdale Battalion of the Border Regiment Subject listing – September 1914 to May 1915 Research exclusively based on the Battalion archive deposited at the Cumbria Archive Centre, Carlisle. Introduction Britain declared war on Germany on 4 August 1914. Almost immediately, the British Expeditionary Force (B.E.F.) embarked for Europe to stop further German invasion into Belgium. On 27 August, at the Battle of Mons, the B.E.F. was routed and the War Office realised the need for volunteers to join the Army. On 3 September in London, 33,000 volunteers were recruited in one day; men were urged to “join up with your pals.” The 5 th Earl of Lonsdale (known as the Yellow Earl) was either the second or third person in the country to be given permission by the War Office to raise a battalion of pals. Lord Lonsdale’s telegram to the War Office read: ‘meeting of Cumberland & Westmorland Territorial Force Association today decided create special Lonsdale Battalion men who had already enlisted in groups for this Unit have been suddenly called Depot Carlisle and merged with others. This has proved prejudicial to recruiting. Essential that Men now enlisted for this Lonsdale Battalion being of higher class than ordinary recruits should remain together until transferred Recruiting will commence on receipt of reply.’ 1 Recruitment Phase One The War Office agreed to the request two days later. An Executive Committee of the Association decided to raise 4 Companies: A & B from North and East Cumberland based at the racecourse in Blackwell, Carlisle; C from Westmorland based in Kendal; and D from West Cumberland based in Workington.
    [Show full text]
  • The Northmen in Cumberland & Westmoreland
    >id£ik^ \./ h0k^ ^!5w-u»w' '^^4:r*€> %. < #'\ \^4--^ / 0f§^ ..# V THE NORTHMEN IN CUMBERLAND & WESTMORELAND BY ROBERT FERGUSON. XiOlsrJDOlT: liO aiT O aye -A- IT -A.25TX) CO CJ^TtXiXSTj^z It. & J. STEEL. 1866. •. }tia\ h^i^^^ prefacf;. The present little work owes its origin to an attempt to present, in the form of a popular lecture, such of the " leading facts contained in Mr. Worsaae's Danes and " Norwegians in England as might be supposed to be more particularly interesting to a Cumberland audience. The slight investigation consequent upon this under- taking convinced the author that the mine was worth working deeper, and an increasing interest in the sub- ject led him on till the extent of his researches appeared to him to be such as to warrant him in giving them to the public. He is fully aware that a work like the present, which is to a great extent etymological, must of necessity contain much that is more or less conjectural, and has endeavoured, as far as possible, to avoid dogmatism, and to qualify the expression of his opinion according to the circumstances of the case. At an early period of his enquiry he was led to form the theory of an immigi'ation more particularly Nor- wegian proceeding from the western side of the island, and a part of his object has been to lay before the PRONUNCIATION OF OLD NORSE. In order to enable the reader to understand the derivations in the following: pages, it is indispensable for him to pay a little attention to the pronunciation of Old Norse.
    [Show full text]
  • Copeland LDF Issues and Options Responses to Consultation
    Copeland LDF Issues and Options Responses to Consultation Summary Report September 2009 Contents Introduction 3 Responses to the Consultation 3 Structure of the Report 3 Call for Sites Responses 4 Spatial Portrait, Vision and Objectives 5 Environmental Protection and Enhancement 7 Sustainable Settlements 14 Economic Opportunity and Regeneration 25 Accessibility and Transport 33 Appendix 1 – List of Respondents 37 Appendix 2 – New Site Proposals 38 Introduction The Copeland LDF Issues and Options Consultation took place between 28 May and 10 July 2009. The deadline for responses was extended further to the 7 August 2009 due to a number of public meetings which took place after the initial deadline. At this initial consultation stage we asked for views on the issues facing Copeland borough and potential solutions (options) for addressing them. The consultation was based on a discussion paper which contained 86 questions as a focus for interested parties to respond. It also provided an opportunity for people to put forward sites they wished to have considered for development as part of the sites allocation process. The Issues and Options consultation report was designed to cover the Local Development Framework as a whole (i.e. the Core Strategy, Development Management Policies and site selection criteria for the Site Allocations DPD). Responses to the Consultation 44 representations were received in response to the questions in the LDF Issues and Options Consultation document, while 32 Calls for Sites responses were also received. Most responses to the questionnaire were from national, regional and local agencies, local community groups and statutory consultees. However, responses to the questionnaires were also received from: Developers, landowners and agents (8) Parish Councils (6) Copeland Borough Councillors (2) and 1 Cumbria County Councillor Local residents (2) A list of those who responded to the Issues and Options questions can be found in Appendix 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Kirkby Thore Roman Fort, Cumbria: Geophysical Survey Report © Waa Ltd Nov‐2013
    KIRKBY THORE ROMAN FORT, CUMBRIA GEOPHYSICAL SURVEY REPORT CP. NO: CP10157 14/11/2013 MARTIN RAILTON BA (HONS), MA, MIFA WARDELL ARMSTRONG ARCHAEOLOGY LTD COCKLAKES YARD, COTEHILL, CARLISLE, CUMBRIA, CA4 0BQ TEL/FAX: (01228) 564820/560025 WWW.WA‐ARCHAEOLOGY.COM WARDELL ARMSTRONG ARCHAEOLOGY DOCUMENT TITLE: Roman Fort, Kirkby Thore, Cumbria DOCUMENT TYPE: Geophysical Survey Report CLIENT: North Pennines AONB Partnership CP NUMBER: CP10157 HER: ‐ PLANNING APP. NO: ‐ OASIS REFERENCE: wardella2‐164201 PRINT DATE: 14/11/2013 GRID REFERENCE: NY 637 257 Quality Assurance This report covers works as outlined in the brief for the above‐named project as issued by the relevant authority, and as outlined in the agreed programme of works. Any deviation to the programme of works has been agreed by all parties. The works have been carried out according to the guidelines set out in the Institute for Archaeologists (IfA) Standards, Policy Statements and Codes of Conduct. REVISION SCHEDULE 01 02 03 PREPARED BY: Kevin Mounsey POSITION: Assistant Supervisor DATE: 13/11/13 EDITED BY: Martin Railton POSITION: Senior Project Manager DATE: 13/11/13 APPROVED BY: Frank Giecco POSITION: Technical Director DATE: 13/11/13 This report has been prepared by Wardell Armstrong Archaeology with all reasonable skill, care and diligence, within the terms of the Contract with the Client. The report is confidential to the Client and Wardell Armstrong Archaeology accepts no responsibility of whatever nature to third parties to whom this report may be made known. No part of this document may be reproduced without the prior written approval of Wardell Armstrong Archaeology. KIRKBY THORE ROMAN FORT, CUMBRIA: GEOPHYSICAL SURVEY REPORT © WAA LTD NOV‐2013 CONTENTS SUMMARY ................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]