DOCSLIB.ORG

Building Back Better: Our Plan for Health and Social Care

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Building Back Better: Our Plan for Health and Social Care BUILD BACK BETTER. Our plan for health and social care Building Back Better: Our Plan for Health and Social Care Presented to Parliament by the Prime Minister by Command of Her Majesty September 2021 CP 506 © Crown copyright 2021 This publication is licensed under the terms of the Open Government Licence v3.0 except where otherwise stated. To view this licence, visit nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3. Where we have identified any third party copyright information you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. This publication is available at www.gov.uk/official-documents. Any enquiries regarding this publication should be sent to us at [email protected]. ISBN 978-1-5286-2857-0 E02669460 09/21 Printed on paper containing 75% recycled fibre content minimum. Printed in the UK by HH Associates Ltd. on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office. 2 CONTENTS Foreword 4 Introduction 6 Our plan for healthcare 9 Tackling the electives backlog 11 Putting the NHS on a sustainable footing 12 Focussing on prevention 13 Our plan for adult social care in England 15 Capping adult social care costs 16 Financial assistance to people without substantial assets 17 Wider support for the social care system 19 Improving the integration of health and social care 20 Our new funding plan 23 A new Health and Social Care Levy 23 Impacts of the Levy 24 Increasing dividend tax rates 25 Delivering for the whole United Kingdom 25 Conclusion 27 Technical Annex: Health and Social Care Levy 28 Summary of impacts 28 Dividend tax increase 31 3 Foreword Prime Minister Rt Hon Boris Johnson, MP The COVID-19 pandemic has been an unprecedented challenge. The worst public health emergency for a century has had a profound impact on the NHS. Staff have treated more than half a million COVID-19 patients over the last 18 months in hospital alone – providing outstanding care for those suffering new, complex and sometimes severely debilitating conditions. The pandemic has illuminated chronic problems in our health and social care system, and made many of them worse. For instance, when COVID-19 broke out, there were thousands of hospital beds filled with people that could have been better cared for elsewhere. These problems are making it much harder to manage the pressures that have inevitably built up elsewhere in the system as a result of the pandemic. The need to treat COVID-19 patients has contributed to worsening wait times for non-COVID-19 care. Before the pandemic, nine out of ten were waiting fewer than 25 weeks in England, but that has now risen to 44 weeks. The number of NHS patients waiting for tests, surgery and routine treatment in England is at a record high of 5.5 million and could potentially reach 13 million over the next few years. Health services in other parts of the UK have faced similar challenges. Around seven million patients in England did not come forward for treatment during the pandemic – and it is right that they should now be seen and given the treatment that they need. So while hard-working NHS staff are doing their best, it has been estimated that it may take the NHS up to a decade to clear treatment backlogs without concerted action. We must also address the challenges in adult social care. The pandemic has placed significant pressure on the sector. But even before the pandemic there were problems in the sector. People in England were required to pay for all of their care needs in full, right down to £23,250, at which point the state would start to provide some support. At an already difficult time in their lives, people suffering medical conditions such as dementia faced losing their life savings. Successive governments have pledged to reform the system but none have brought about long-term change. So we must take the same far-sighted approach as the Government that established the NHS and the modern welfare state after the Second World War. We must pursue the equivalent project of our era, supporting the NHS, reforming adult social care and creating a new integrated system between health and social care focussed on improving outcomes for our people. And that is what this Government will do. 4 We will provide significant new investment – reducing long waits for the tests and treatment that people need. We will bring the health and the social care systems more closely together – so that people are cared for in the most appropriate place for their needs, whether at hospital, in care or at home. We will protect individuals and families against unpredictable and potentially catastrophic care costs – so that from October 2023, no eligible person starting adult social care will have to pay more than £86,000 for personal care over their lifetime. We will recognise the extraordinary contribution that health and social care staff made in helping the country through the pandemic – in part by making sure that they have the support that they need. This is an unprecedented investment in health and social care. It is one that we should all accept some personal responsibility for providing. Both for our own futures and to care for our loved ones. To do otherwise and rely solely on the state to step in through yet more borrowing would be to fray the bonds that hold families and society together. So it is right that we should introduce a Health and Social Care Levy to benefit the whole of the UK, with new funding to support health and social care services in England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland. No government wants to raise taxes, but nor should they neglect their duty of care to their citizens. So we must act to build a health and care system which reflects the brilliance of the staff working within it. The NHS is a source of enormous pride for the nation. We will ensure that it continues to be. Rt Hon Boris Johnson, MP Prime Minister 5 Introduction 1. This Government is committed to the delivery of world leading health and social care across the whole of the UK. The response of the nation’s public services to the COVID-19 pandemic is a source of extraordinary pride. This was recognised by the award of the George Cross to the UK’s national health services. 2. The NHS has led the response to COVID-19 and continues to drive our vaccine rollout. To protect staff and patients, and combat the risk of infection, hospital wards and waiting rooms were reconfigured to reduce transmission of the virus, and the Government provided billions of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) items. The Government also rapidly expanded hospital bed capacity to treat COVID-19 patients and, together with the devolved administrations, swiftly established ten Nightingale hospitals across the UK. We have also worked with the devolved administrations to deliver the National Testing Programme, with UK-wide daily testing capacity currently standing at more than 600,000 PCR tests per day, supported by seven Lighthouse laboratories across the UK. This programme has provided over 166 million tests to date for UK citizens across 1100 test sites. We have also led the world with our vaccine programme – from AstraZeneca’s initial design, to public volunteers for vaccine trials, to manufacturing in England and bottling in Wales. This incredible effort meant that the UK was one of the first countries in the world to start vaccinating our citizens and, working closely with the devolved administrations, we have now vaccinated more than 48 million people right across the UK. 3. The pressure from the COVID-19 pandemic caused significant disruption to the provision of health and social care in England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland. The immense efforts of those on the front line to respond to the pandemic and roll out the vaccine programme inevitably reduced the capacity to respond to non-COVID-19 related care. For instance, 5.5 million people in England are now waiting for non-emergency treatment, at least 900,000 more than before the pandemic, and average NHS waiting times are over ten weeks, up around 40 per cent since before the pandemic. 4. The impact of the pandemic has also increased pressure on wider NHS funding. Much of that increase was temporary, but underlying pressures are expected to build as a result of demographic changes, the long-term impact of COVID-19, rising care costs and NHS backlogs. The ONS estimate that UK Government spending on health increased by around 25 per cent in 2020, by far the biggest year-on-year increase since the ONS series began in 19971. The NHS must be put on a more sustainable footing so that it can rise to the challenges of the 21st century. 5. Social care is an integral part of our society and economy. Adult social care covers social work, personal care and practical support for younger and older adults over 18 with a physical disability, learning disability, physical or mental illness. It also includes safeguarding for those at risk of harm and abuse, drug or alcohol dependency, as well as support for unpaid carers. Around 950,000 adults in England receive some form of 1 ONS, 2021. Available at: <Healthcare expenditure, UK Health Accounts provisional estimates: 2020> 6 long-term social care support, which is focused on enabling a sustained and independent quality of life. 6. We all share a commitment to ensure that adults that need extra care are well looked after. But it is widely recognised that the social care system could be working better both for people using it and for those caring for others.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Social Care for Adults Aged 18–64
    Analysis April 2020 Social care for adults aged 18–64 Omar Idriss, Lucinda Allen, Hugh Alderwick Acknowledgements We would like to thank Richard Humphries, Jessica Morris, Helen Buckingham, Joshua Kraindler, Anita Charlesworth, Nihar Shembavnekar, Charles Tallack, Ruth Thorlby, and Jennifer Dixon for their comments on earlier drafts of the paper. We are also grateful for the contribution of other Health Foundation staff. Errors or omissions remain the responsibility of the authors alone. Copyright acknowledgements Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Incorporates data reproduced from www.skillsforcare.org.uk. When referencing this publication please use the following URL: https://doi.org/10.37829/HF-2020-P02 Social care for adults aged 18–64 is published by the Health Foundation, 8 Salisbury Square, London EC4Y 8AP ISBN: 978-1-911615-45-3 © 2020 The Health Foundation Contents Key points 2 Introduction 5 1: System context 8 2: Care needs 17 3: System performance 22 4: Outcomes 29 Discussion 35 References 39 Annex 1: Data sources 42 Key points • The adult social care system in England is broken and needs fixing. Debates about reform often focus on older people and the risk of them having to sell their homes to pay for social care. • What often gets missed are the issues facing younger adults needing social care – people aged 18–64 with learning disabilities, mental health problems and other social needs – and the care they need to support their independence and wellbeing. This publication presents analysis of publicly available data to understand the needs of younger adults in the social care system, how they differ from those of older people, and how these needs are changing.
    [Show full text]
  • Social Care Provision in the UK and the Role of Carers Debate on 24 June 2021 Author: Thomas Brown Date Published: 17 June 2021
    Library Briefing Social care provision in the UK and the role of carers Debate on 24 June 2021 Author: Thomas Brown Date published: 17 June 2021 On 24 June 2021, the House of Lords is due to debate a motion moved by Baroness Jolly (Liberal Democrat) that “this House takes note of social care provision in the United Kingdom, and the role of carers in that provision”. The term ‘social care’ covers a wide range of support provided to children, young people, and working age and older adults, as well as their carers. This support can be provided formally, either by local authorities, private companies, charities, or other bodies; informally, by family members, friends, or neighbours; or through a combination of these. Although in practice it can include support for both children and adults, the term is often used as shorthand for adult social care in debates on the subject. Social care is a devolved matter and provision differs across the UK: • In England, local authorities hold both responsibility for children’s social care and a formal role in assessing the need for and commissioning adult social care. Differences in budgets, costs and local authorities having discretion to provide adult care services to individuals outside of eligibility thresholds have led to variations across the country. The adult social care system has been the focus of longstanding calls for reform. The UK Government has said it will bring forward proposals to “fix” adult social care in England later this year. • In Scotland, where an entitlement to free personal social care has been in place since 2002, the Scottish Government has pledged to create a National Care Service.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report and Accounts 2019-2020
    Public Health England - Annual Report and Accounts 2019/20 1 Protecting and improving the nation’s health Annual Report and Accounts 2019/20 HC 913 Public Health England - Annual Report and Accounts 2019/20 3 Public Health England Annual Report and Accounts 2019/20 Presented to the House of Commons pursuant to section 7 of the Government Resources and Accounts Act 2000 Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed 26 November 2020 HC 913 4 Public Health England - Annual Report and Accounts 2019/20 About Public Health England Public Health England exists to protect and improve the nation’s health and wellbeing, and reduce health inequalities. We do this through world-leading science, research, knowledge and intelligence, advocacy, partnerships and the delivery of specialist public health services. We are an executive agency of the Department of Health and Social Care, and a distinct delivery organisation with operational autonomy. We provide government, local government, the NHS, Parliament, industry and the public with evidence-based professional, scientific and delivery expertise and support. Public Health England Wellington House 133-155 Waterloo Road London SE1 8UG Tel: 020 7654 8000 www.gov.uk/phe Twitter: @PHE_uk © Crown copyright 2020 This publication is licensed under the terms of the Open Government Licence v3.0 except where otherwise stated. To view this licence, visit nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3. Where we have identified any third party copyright information you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. Duncan Selbie picture, pages 8 and 86 © Guzelian. This publication is available at: www.gov.uk/official-documents.
    [Show full text]
  • Ownership in Social Care
    OWNERSHIP IN SOCIAL CARE WHY IT MATTERS AND WHAT CAN BE DONE Written by: Daniel Button and Sarah Bedford New Economics Foundation www.neweconomics.org [email protected] +44 (0)20 7820 6300 @NEF Registered charity number 1055254 © 2019 The New Economics Foundation 2 Ownership in social care: why it matters and what can be done CONTENTS Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 3 Ownership and why it matters ............................................................................................ 5 Democratic models of ownership and practice ................................................................ 8 How to get there ................................................................................................................... 12 Conclusion ............................................................................................................................. 15 Endnotes ................................................................................................................................ 16 This short paper sets out a vision for adult social care as a Universal Basic Service, with an emphasis on the achievement of social goals. It is one of a series of working papers developing proposals for Universal Basic Services (UBS). The New Economics Foundation supports UBS as central to its mission to develop a new social settlement. In this context, ‘services’ mean collectively generated activities that serve the public
    [Show full text]
  • Scotland's Economic Future
    SCOTLAND’S ECONOMIC FUTURE EDITED BY PROFESSOR SIR DONALD MACKAY 2011 First published October 2011 © Reform Scotland 2011 7-9 North St David Street, Edinburgh, EH2 1AW All rights reserved SCOTLAND’S ECONOMIC FUTURE EDITED BY PROFESSOR SIR DONALD MACKAY Published by Reform Scotland Reform Scotland is an independent, non-party think tank that aims to set out a better way to deliver increased economic prosperity and more effective public services based on the traditional Scottish principles of limited government, diversity and personal responsibility. The views expressed in this publication are those of the contributors and not those of Reform Scotland, its managing Trustees, Advisory Board or staff. October 2011 Reform Scotland is a charity registered in Scotland (No SCO39624) and is also a company limited by guarantee (No SC336414) with its Registered Office at 7-9 North St David Street, Edinburgh, EH2 1AW. Cover design and typesetting by Cake Graphic & Digital Printed in Scotland by Allander CONTENTS BIOGRAPHIES V PREFACE by PROFESSOR SIR DONALD MACKay IX CHAPTER 1 by PROFESSOR SIR DONALD MACKay 1 The framework, the authors and Home Rule. CHAPTER 2 by PROFESSOR JOHN Kay 11 Is recent economic history a help? CHAPTER 3 by PROFESSOR DAVID SIMPSON 23 An environment for economic growth: is small still beautiful? CHAPTER 4 by JIM & MARGARET CUTHBERT 35 GERS: where now? CHAPTER 5 by PROFESSOR DREW Scott 45 The Scotland Bill: way forward or cul de sac? CHAPTER 6 by PROFESSOR DAVID BELL 65 The Scottish economy: seeking an advantage? CHAPTER 7 by
    [Show full text]
  • What Does Brexit Mean for the UK Social Care Workforce? Perspectives from the Recruitment and Retention Frontline
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Bournemouth University Research Online Received: 4 December 2017 | Revised: 9 October 2018 | Accepted: 22 October 2018 DOI: 10.1111/hsc.12684 ORIGINAL ARTICLE What does Brexit mean for the UK social care workforce? Perspectives from the recruitment and retention frontline Rosie Read | Lee‐Ann Fenge Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, Bournemouth University, Abstract Bournemouth, UK The UK’s departure from the European Union (Brexit) is likely to result in greater im‐ Correspondence migration and employment restrictions on European Union/European Economic Rosie Read, Faculty of Health and Social Area (EU/EEA) nationals within the United Kingdom. EU/EEA citizens constitute a Sciences, Bournemouth University, Bournemouth, UK. significant proportion of the current social care workforce. Research evaluating the Email: [email protected] impact of Brexit on social care has highlighted potentially severe future workforce Funding information shortfalls, but has not engaged in detail with the experiences of social care personnel Bournemouth University involved in day‐to‐day recruitment and retention activities. This article explores how social care managers evaluate Brexit’s prospects for future workforce sustainability, through the prism of their organisation’s workforce requirements. This qualitative study incorporated in‐depth semi‐structured interviews and questionnaire surveys with domiciliary and residential care managers. Data collection focused on an urban conurbation in south‐west England, with demographic characteristics likely to make post‐Brexit recruitment and retention in social care particularly challenging. A key finding is that, irrespective of whether they employ EU/EEA workers or not, research participants have deep concerns about Brexit’s potential impact on the social care labour market.
    [Show full text]
  • House of Commons Official Report
    Wednesday Volume 691 17 March 2021 No. 192 HOUSE OF COMMONS OFFICIAL REPORT PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) Wednesday 17 March 2021 © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2021 This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Open Parliament licence, which is published at www.parliament.uk/site-information/copyright/. 303 17 MARCH 2021 304 Simon Hart: The best way of avoiding that outcome House of Commons is for the Welsh Government to get behind the scheme and support a project that is endorsed by local authorities and port authorities in Wales, and to encourage jobs Wednesday 17 March 2021 and livelihoods in that way. Every single day that they leave it—on the basis of the “not invented here” The House met at half-past Eleven o’clock syndrome—will cost jobs and livelihoods. My message to the hon. Gentleman is get hold of the Welsh Government and encourage them to come to the party. PRAYERS The Union [MR SPEAKER in the Chair] Virtual participation in proceedings commenced (Orders, Anne McLaughlin (Glasgow North East) (SNP): What 4 June and 30 December 2020). recent assessment his Department has made of the [NB: [V] denotes a Member participating virtually.] strength of the Union between Wales and the rest of the UK. [913410] Oral Answers to Questions Andrew Bowie (West Aberdeenshire and Kincardine) (Con): What steps his Department is taking to strengthen the Union. [913417] WALES The Secretary of State for Wales (Simon Hart): As the vaccine roll-out has shown, our four nations are The Secretary of State was asked— safer, stronger and more prosperous together, and I Liverpool City Region Freeport look forward to the people of Wales giving a resounding endorsement of the Union at the Senedd elections in Mr David Jones (Clwyd West) (Con): What discussions May.
    [Show full text]
  • Mcgarvey and Cairney, 2008
    McGarvey Prelims 20/3/08 9:07 am Page i Scottish Politics McGarvey Prelims 20/3/08 9:07 am Page ii McGarvey Prelims 20/3/08 9:07 am Page iii Scottish Politics An Introduction Neil McGarvey and Paul Cairney McGarvey Prelims 20/3/08 9:07 am Page iv © Neil McGarvey and Paul Cairney 2008 All rights reserved. No reproduction, copy or transmission of this publication may be made without written permission. No paragraph of this publication may be reproduced, copied or transmitted save with written permission or in accordance with the provisions of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, or under the terms of any licence permitting limited copying issued by the Copyright Licensing Agency, 90 Tottenham Court Road, London W1T 4LP. Any person who does any unauthorized act in relation to this publication may be liable to criminal prosecution and civil claims for damages. The authors have asserted their rights to be identified as the authors of this work in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. First published 2008 by PALGRAVE MACMILLAN Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire RG21 6XS and 175 Fifth Avenue, New York, N.Y. 10010 Companies and representatives throughout the world PALGRAVE MACMILLAN is the global academic imprint of the Palgrave Macmillan division of St. Martin’s Press, LLC and of Palgrave Macmillan Ltd. Macmillan® is a registered trademark in the United States, United Kingdom and other countries. Palgrave is a registered trademark in the European Union and other countries. ISBN-13: 978–1–4039–4328–6 hardback ISBN-10: 1–4039–4328–1 hardback ISBN-13: 978–1–4039–4329–3 paperback ISBN-10: 1–4039–4329–X paperback This book is printed on paper suitable for recycling and made from fully managed and sustained forest sources.
    [Show full text]
  • Report: Social Care: Funding and Workforce
    House of Commons Health and Social Care Committee Social care: funding and workforce Third Report of Session 2019–21 Report, together with formal minutes relating to the report Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed 13 October 2020 HC 206 Published on 22 October 2020 by authority of the House of Commons Health and Social Care Committee The Health and Social Care Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the expenditure, administration, and policy of the Department of Health and Social Care. Current membership Jeremy Hunt MP (Conservative, South West Surrey) (Chair) Paul Bristow MP (Conservative, Peterborough) Rosie Cooper MP (Labour, West Lancashire) Dr James Davies MP (Conservative, Vale of Clwyd) Dr Luke Evans MP (Conservative, Bosworth) Neale Hanvey MP (Scottish National Party, Kirkcaldy and Cowdenbeath) Barbara Keeley MP (Labour, Worsley and Eccles South) Taiwo Owatemi MP (Labour, Coventry North West) Sarah Owen MP (Labour, Luton North) Dean Russell MP (Conservative, Watford) Laura Trott MP (Conservative, Sevenoaks) Powers The Committee is one of the departmental select committees, the powers of which are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No 152. These are available on the internet via www.parliament.uk. Publication © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2019. This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Open Parliament Licence, which is published at www.parliament.uk/site-information/copyright-parliament/. Committee reports are published on the Committee’s website at www.parliament.uk/hsccom and in print by Order of the House. Evidence relating to this report is published on the inquiry publications page of the Committee’s website.
    [Show full text]
  • A Minister of State for Social Care
    Remedying a sector in crisis: A case for the reinstatement of a Minister of State for Social Care Foreword In 2008, the then Labour Government, led by Gordon Brown, appointed Phil Hope as the Minister of State for Social Care2 – the first time social care had been given such a senior post. The portfolio continued until July 2016, when Prime Minister Theresa May appointed David Mowat in the new role of Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Community Health & Care. No-one who Hft believes that this reshuffle has ‘demoted’ social care to a lower tier of minister, and is a step back in terms of hasn’t been a addressing the challenges facing the social care sector. Parliamentary Under- Secretary of State has any This demotion could not have happened at a more urgent conception of how time for the social care sector: unimportant a Parliamentary Under-Secretary of Local authorities, who commission the majority of State is. adult social care, have seen their budgets cut by central Government. - Andrew Cavendish, Parliamentary Under- Secretary of State 1960-1964.1 Unfunded increases in the National Living Wage will create a £1.3 billion shortfall in funding by 2020. Ongoing legal uncertainties regarding payments for Sleep-In shifts could see the sector face back payments of between £400-600 million. As a charity in the learning disability sector Hft is increasingly supporting individuals with complex needs and challenging behaviours, many of whom require larger, more expensive care packages. Like the population at large, adults with learning disabilities are leading longer, healthier lives, meaning that they will require more support throughout their lifetime.
    [Show full text]
  • The Referendum on Scotland's Future Saturday 25Th January 2014
    The Referendum on Scotland’s Future Saturday 25th January 2014 Menzies Hotel, Glasgow “Women need to have their voices heard as part of the debate around Scotland’s future. They are the cornerstone of communities – both socially and economically. The campaigns need to engage with women and listen to their concerns and emerging issues. This event has ensured that those attending are able to raise and seek answers to the issues which are important to them.” Agnes Tolmie Chair, SWC www.scottishwomensconvention.org BACKGROUND TO THE EVENT On 18th September 2014, people across the country will take to the polls to vote on the question: “Should Scotland be an independent country?” Since the announcement of the referendum on Scotland’s future, the SWC has consulted with women from a range of diverse backgrounds and geographical locations to ascertain their views on this historic vote. Throughout 2012 the SWC held roadshows in Aberdeen, Anstruther, Dumfries, Glenrothes, Islay, Motherwell, Paisley, Peterhead and Stranraer. Discussions in these areas focussed on whether women felt they had enough information to make an informed decision and use their vote. Overall, there was seen to be a general lack of information regarding the 2014 referendum. More should have been made readily available for local people, i.e. having literature available from both campaigns at local community centres, schools, colleges, libraries etc. Having impartial information, without any party political bias, would also help women when it comes to making a decision regarding the referendum. During the 2013 roadshow programme, the SWC visited Kyle of Lochalsh, Breakish, Portree, Eyemouth, Haddington, Greenock and Livingston.
    [Show full text]
  • The Privatisation and Financialisation of Social Care in the UK
    The privatisation and financialisation of social care in the UK Kate Bayliss and Jasmine Gideon Working paper No. 238 October 2020 The SOAS Department of Economics Working Paper Series is published electronically by SOAS University of London. ISSN 1753 – 5816 This and other papers can be downloaded free of charge from: SOAS Department of Economics Working Paper Series at http://www.soas.ac.uk/economics/research/workingpapers/ Research Papers in Economics (RePEc) electronic library at https://ideas.repec.org/s/soa/wpaper.html Suggested citation Bayliss, K and Gideon, J., (2020) “The privatisation and financialisation of social care in the UK”, SOAS Department of Economics Working Paper No. 238, London: SOAS University of London. Department of Economics SOAS University of London Thornhaugh Street, Russell Square, London WC1H 0XG, UK Phone: + 44 (0)20 7898 4730 Fax: 020 7898 4759 E-mail: [email protected] http://www.soas.ac.uk/economics/ © Copyright is held by the author(s) of each working paper. The privatisation and financialisation of social care in the UK Kate Bayliss1 Jasmine Gideon2 Abstract Even before the arrival of COVID-19, the care sector was already in long-term crisis, in large part due to insufficient funding, but the sector has also been under pressure from structural changes resulting from privatisation and financialisation.3 Social care is one of many elements of everyday life which, over the past few decades, have been repackaged to suit the needs of global capital. The process has transformed a social need into a financial issue which in turn translates into new social relations where narratives are constructed in terms of markets and efficiency.
    [Show full text]