Woodbridgewoodbridge

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Woodbridgewoodbridge by Peter J. Fakoury, DOWN HOME SERIES Contributing Writer During the year 2001, we’re making our way around Virginia, each issue visiting a small town and meeting some of the folks who make up the heart of electric co-op country. On this year’s fifh stop, we’ll be... Down Home in WoodbridgeWoodbridge This Northern Virginia community 66 Warrenton owes a rich history and New Market Woodbridge a bright future to its DWIGHT PYLE PHOTO, COURTESY OF PRINCE WILLIAM COUNTY/MANASSAS CONFERENCE AND VISITORS BUREAU 81 95 Fishing is serious business at Leesylva- waterfront location. Churchville Charlottesville Montross nia State Park. Several nationally tele- 64 64 Richmond vised bass tournaments are held there Catawba each year. Appomattox Cape Charles Roanoke 460 81 95 85 South Hill 77 FranklinFranklin he greenish waters of Neabsco Creek restaurant has served fresh seafood to local gently lap against the creosoted tim- patrons and visitors for more than three Tbers of an old barge. Her steel skin decades. rusted away, her frame now supports the “For years we were one of the prime decks and upward structures of the Pilot spots in Northern Virginia,” says Pilot House House, one of Woodbridge’s last remaining owner Michael Hill. “People would say, ‘I independently owned restaurants. want to take you to a place that you’ll never The Pilot House is a local landmark in find on your own.’ Now all the restaurants Woodbridge. A 130-foot-long ship with a around here are chains, and the ones that are facade like a paddlewheel steamer, the local and small are struggling to survive.” PETER FAKOURY PHOTO DWIGHT PYLE PHOTO, COURTESY OF PRINCE WILLIAM COUNTY/MANASSAS CONFERENCE AND VISITORS BUREAU Pilot House Restaurant owner Michael Hill is a lifelong Woodbridge resident. His father built the restaurant in 1970. It is a local landmark, and one of Woodbridge’s last remaining independently owned restaurants. In a way the Pilot House stands for a past Woodbridge that is fighting to keep up with its future. Woodbridge is a community with two distinct facets — a colorful history and unique natural beauty on one side, a modern, fast-paced existence on the other. Leesylvania State Park offers a half-mile of sandy Potomac River Beach for fun and frolic. 18 Cooperative Living/June 2001 PHOTO COURTESY OF PRINCE WILLIAM COUNTY/MANASSAS CONFERENCE AND VISITORS BUREAU The Potomac River offers some spectacu- lar views from Freestone Point, now part of Leesylvania State Park. northernmost 500 acres of what is now Woodbridge. The Mason family operated a ferry across the Occoquan River that in 1795 was replaced by a wooden toll bridge. Mason’s plantation later became known as “Woodbridge.” Farther south along the river was Leesylvania, the home of General Robert E. Lee’s grandparents, and the birthplace of his father. The tobacco-producing plantation was situated on Freestone Point, a peninsula of land sandwiched between Neabsco Creek and Powell’s Creek. Not far from Freestone Point sits the Pilot PETER FAKOURY PHOTO House Restaurant. It is a lasting tribute to a Potomac Mills is one of Woodbridge’s most prominent landmarks. The huge outlet part of history Michael Hill remembers well. mall has more than 220 outlet stores. Hill’s father, J. Carl Hill, bought Freestone Point in 1955 with plans of building the To the visitor just passing through, it River to the east. Its northern boundary is the largest waterfront resort area south of would be easy to miss the old (and perhaps Occoquan River, which separates Prince Atlantic City. He built swimming pools and the real) Woodbridge. To many people William County from its northern neighbor, amusements, and had plans for a 600-room Woodbridge is Potomac Mills, the gargantu- Fairfax County. To the south of Woodbridge hotel. But it was gambling that was to pro- an outlet mall situated along I-95. A mecca lie the small towns of Dumfries and duce most of the revenue. for bargain shoppers, it and its surrounding Quantico. In the 1950s, gambling was illegal in retail sprawl followed a wave of residential It is impossible to separate Woodbridge’s Virginia. So was liquor. But Carl Hill ingen- growth that started in the 1960s. Like many past from the Potomac River. The English iously took advantage of the fact that all of localities around the Washington, DC, area, explorer Captain John Smith sailed into the the Potomac River is considered part of Woodbridge has become a bedroom com- area in 1608, shortly after the settlement of Maryland. So he built a pier out into the river munity for commuters who ride the tide of Jamestown. By trading with the Native and anchored a 200-foot cruise ship at its end traffic each morning in search of work. Americans there, he was able to secure for use as a floating nightclub and gambling Woodbridge is more of a place than a enough food to help sustain his settlement. spot. Virginia residents who wanted to play town. Its unincorporated boundaries are not The area was settled in 1653, mostly by the slot machines had only to step onto the well defined. It is Prince William County’s wealthy plantation owners. Some of them pier to be in Maryland territory, where liquor eastern edge, a 10-square-mile area roughly became Virginia’s most prominent families. and gambling were permitted. marked by I-95 to the west and the Potomac George Mason’s grandfather owned the Freestone Point opened in grand fashion June 2001/www.co-opliving.com 19 The formula works. The Lazy Susan has PHOTO COURTESY OF LEESYLVANIA STATE PARK VISITORS CENTER a loyal local patronage. Like many other For two years during the late 1950s, Freestone Point was a popular resort area and artistic endeavors, passion is the other key gambling spot. The S.S. Freestone and its slot machines were the main attraction. ingredient in the Lazy Susan’s success. There is a palpable sense of excitement when in 1957. But it was so close to Washington, high on a hill above Route 1, sits another you enter the theater, which just opened Big DC, that it drew a lot of attention. Some of it piece of old Woodbridge, the Lazy Susan River, the musical adventures of Huckle- was unfavorable. Dinner Theatre. It is one of the oldest pro- berry Finn. With a smile, Kaldenbach says “Some people said, ‘this is a gambling fessional dinner theaters in the Washington, it’s one of her favorite productions. syndicate, the devil’s work,’” laughs Michael DC, area. In continuous operation since Waterfront recreation is perhaps the Hill. “So the governors of Maryland and 1974, the family-owned theater offers a crown jewel of Woodbridge leisure life. Virginia got together and got the Maryland plentiful Pennsylvania Dutch-style buffet Nowhere is that more obvious than at legislature to pass a law that said you had to and four productions a year. Leesylvania State Park. The 512-acre park, be able to walk from Maryland shores in Like the Pilot House, the Lazy Susan has which opened in 1992, represents the next order to have slot machines.” found it a challenge to remain profitable in chapter in the history of Freestone Point. The new law wiped out Carl Hill’s resort an area where people have so many options American Hawaiian Steamship owner in a hurry. It closed after only two short years for spending their money. Daniel Ludwig donated half the value of the of operation. Hill later sold Freestone Point “We’re very careful about how we run land as a tax write-off, paving the way for to the American Hawaiian Steamship this place,” says Karol Kaldenbach, who the creation of the most heavily visited day- Company, which planned to use the land for has managed the theater for the past 21 use park in the Virginia state park system. an oil port. That never happened. The land years. “We watch our overhead, and we try Leesylvania State Park features some of became deserted and wild again, and to keep our shows family-oriented.” the best public boating ramps and facilities remained that way for several decades. When Freestone Point closed, the Hills prospered in other ways. Carl Hill opened a crab house on the Maryland side of the river iscover the natural beauty of the and installed the slot machines there. He A scene from the Lazy Susan DPotomac River front at Leesylvania provided boat transportation across the river Dinner Theatre’s past production State Park. Plenty of activities for the entire for Virginia residents who wanted to gam- of Big River. family. For the naturalist, there is hiking, ble. In 1970 he opened the Pilot House canoeing and bird watching. Sportsmen Restaurant. and water enthusiasts will find the boating and fishing activities endless. History lovers Something for Everyone can wander through the plantation grounds of Revolutionary War hero “Lighthorse” Much of Woodbridge today revolves Harry Lee, the father of General Robert E. around the Route 1 corridor, which parallels Lee, or learn about Freestone Point, the I-95. It is home to countless strip malls, car gambling resort of the 1950s (703-670- dealerships and fast-food restaurants. But 0372). scattered along the five-mile stretch of four- A fairly new waterfront attraction, the lane highway are some interesting antique Occoquan Bay National Wildlife Refuge stores, like Featherstone Square Antique PHOTO COURTESY OF LAZY SUSAN DINNER THEATRE offers a stunning view of Virginia’s coastal Mall, which claims to be the largest antique wetlands. Once a high-tech government mall in Virginia.
Recommended publications
  • Shoreline Situation Report Counties of Fairfax and Arlington, City of Alexandria
    W&M ScholarWorks Reports 1979 Shoreline Situation Report Counties of Fairfax and Arlington, City of Alexandria Dennis W. Owen Virginia Institute of Marine Science Lynne C. Morgan Virginia Institute of Marine Science Nancy M. Sturm Virginia Institute of Marine Science Robert J. Byrne Virginia Institute of Marine Science Carl H. Hobbs III Virginia Institute of Marine Science Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/reports Part of the Environmental Indicators and Impact Assessment Commons, Natural Resources Management and Policy Commons, and the Water Resource Management Commons Recommended Citation Owen, D. W., Morgan, L. C., Sturm, N. M., Byrne, R. J., & Hobbs, C. H. (1979) Shoreline Situation Report Counties of Fairfax and Arlington, City of Alexandria. Special Report tn Applied Marine Science and Ocean Engineering No. 166. Virginia Institute of Marine Science, William & Mary. https://doi.org/10.21220/ V5K134 This Report is brought to you for free and open access by W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Reports by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Shoreline Situation Report COUNTIES OF FAIRFAX AND ARLINGTON, CITY OF ALEXANDRIA Prepared and Published With Funds Provided to the Commonwealth by the Office of Coastal Zone Management, National Oceanic and Atmospheric·Administration, Grant Nos. 04-7-158-44041 and 04-8-M01-309 Special Report In Applied Marine Science and Ocean Engineering Number 166 of the VIRGINIA INSTITUTE OF MARINE SCIENCE Gloucester Point, Virginia 23062 1979 Shoreline Situation Report COUNTIES OF FAIRFAX AND ARLINGTON, CITY OF AL.EXANDRIA Prepared by: Dennis W.
    [Show full text]
  • Authorization to Discharge Under the Virginia Stormwater Management Program and the Virginia Stormwater Management Act
    COMMONWEALTHof VIRGINIA DEPARTMENTOFENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY Permit No.: VA0088587 Effective Date: April 1, 2015 Expiration Date: March 31, 2020 AUTHORIZATION TO DISCHARGE UNDER THE VIRGINIA STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PROGRAM AND THE VIRGINIA STORMWATER MANAGEMENT ACT Pursuant to the Clean Water Act as amended and the Virginia Stormwater Management Act and regulations adopted pursuant thereto, the following owner is authorized to discharge in accordance with the effluent limitations, monitoring requirements, and other conditions set forth in this state permit. Permittee: Fairfax County Facility Name: Fairfax County Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System County Location: Fairfax County is 413.15 square miles in area and is bordered by the Potomac River to the East, the city of Alexandria and the county of Arlington to the North, the county of Loudoun to the West, and the county of Prince William to the South. The owner is authorized to discharge from municipal-owned storm sewer outfalls to the surface waters in the following watersheds: Watersheds: Stormwater from Fairfax County discharges into twenty-two 6lh order hydrologic units: Horsepen Run (PL18), Sugarland Run (PL21), Difficult Run (PL22), Potomac River- Nichols Run-Scott Run (PL23), Potomac River-Pimmit Run (PL24), Potomac River- Fourmile Run (PL25), Cameron Run (PL26), Dogue Creek (PL27), Potomac River-Little Hunting Creek (PL28), Pohick Creek (PL29), Accotink Creek (PL30),(Upper Bull Run (PL42), Middle Bull Run (PL44), Cub Run (PL45), Lower Bull Run (PL46), Occoquan River/Occoquan Reservoir (PL47), Occoquan River-Belmont Bay (PL48), Potomac River- Occoquan Bay (PL50) There are 15 major streams: Accotink Creek, Bull Run, Cameron Run (Hunting Creek), Cub Run, Difficult Run, Dogue Creek, Four Mile Run, Horsepen Run, Little Hunting Creek, Little Rocky Run, Occoquan Receiving Streams: River, Pimmit run, Pohick creek, Popes Head Creek, Sugarland Run, and various other minor streams.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary of Water Resource and Related Data in Loudoun County, VA
    Summary of Water Resource and Related Data in Loudoun County, VA Prepared by: Loudoun County Department of Building & Development Water Resources Team September, 2008 Loudoun County - Water Resources Data Summary 1 Groundwater Data .................................................................................................................................................................................... 3 1.1 Loudoun County Groundwater, Well, and Pollution Sources ......................................................................................................... 3 1.2 USGS Groundwater Wells ................................................................................................................................................................ 3 1.3 County Hydrogeologic Studies ......................................................................................................................................................... 3 1.4 USGS NAWQA Wells ..................................................................................................................................................................... 3 1.5 WRMP Monitoring Wells................................................................................................................................................................. 3 1.6 Water Quality Data from LCSA and VADH Public Water Supplies ............................................................................................. 3 1.7 Luck Stone Special Exception Water Quality Reports ...................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Prince William County Tidal Marsh Inventory
    W&M ScholarWorks Reports 5-1975 Prince William County Tidal Marsh Inventory Kenneth A. Moore Virginia Institute of Marine Science Gene M. Silberhorn Virginia Institute of Marine Science Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/reports Part of the Terrestrial and Aquatic Ecology Commons Recommended Citation Moore, K. A., & Silberhorn, G. M. (1975) Prince William County Tidal Marsh Inventory. Special Report in Applied Marine Science and Ocean Engineering No. 78. Virginia Institute of Marine Science, College of William and Mary. https://doi.org/10.21220/V55H9H This Report is brought to you for free and open access by W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Reports by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. PRINCE WILLIAM COUNTY TIDAL MARSH INVENTORY Special Report No. 78 in Applied Marine Science and Ocean Engineering Kenneth A. Moore G.M. Silberhorn , Project Leader VIRGINIA INSTITUTE OF MARINE SCIENCE Gloucester Point, Virginia 23062 Dr. William J. Hargis, Jr., Director MAY 1975 Acknowledgments Funds for the publication and distribution of this report have been provided by the Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Office of Coastal Zone Management, Grant No. 04-5-158-5001. I would like to express my sincerest gratitude to Dr. Gene M. Silberhorn. His invaluable guidance and assistance made this report possible. I wish also to thank Col. George Dawes, for his review of this report and his assistance in the field and Dr. William J. Hargis, Dr. Michael E. Bender, Mr. James Mercer, Mr. Thomas Barnard, Miss Christine Plummer and Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Resources Technical Report
    TRANSFORM 66 OUTSIDE the Beltway I-66 CORRIDOR 66 IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT Multimodal Solutions - 495 to Haymarket Tier 2 Draft Environmental Assessment 193 Town of Natural Resources TechnicalTown of Report Middleburg Herndon LOUDOUN FAUQUIER 50 267 Washington Dulles McLean International Airport 309 28 286 Tysons Corner West Falls Church 7 Chantilly Dunn Loring FALLS 123 CHURCH 29 Vienna LOUDOUN Fair Lakes 50 FAIRFAX CO. 66 15 FAIRFAX CITY Centreville 286 29 236 Manassas National Battlefield Park Haymarket Fairfax Station Springfield 66 Gainesville 234 28 MANASSAS PARK PRINCE WILLIAM 29 FAUQUIER 234 123 286 215 Ft. Belvoir MANASSAS MAY 12, 2015 Tier 2 Draft Environmental Assessment Natural Resources Technical Report Draft – May 12, 2015 I-66 Corridor Improvements Project – Natural Resources Technical Report May 12, 2015 Table of Contents Chapter 1 – Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Project Description ..................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Methods ...................................................................................................................................... 1-2 Chapter 2 – Affected Environment ......................................................................................................... 2-1 2.1 Water Resources ......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Corridor Analysis for the Potomac Heritage National Scenic Trail in Northern Virginia
    Corridor Analysis For The Potomac Heritage National Scenic Trail In Northern Virginia June 2011 Acknowledgements The Northern Virginia Regional Commission (NVRC) wishes to acknowledge the following individuals for their contributions to this report: Don Briggs, Superintendent of the Potomac Heritage National Scenic Trail for the National Park Service; Liz Cronauer, Fairfax County Park Authority; Mike DePue, Prince William Park Authority; Bill Ference, City of Leesburg Park Director; Yon Lambert, City of Alexandria Department of Transportation; Ursula Lemanski, Rivers, Trails and Conservation Assistance Program for the National Park Service; Mark Novak, Loudoun County Park Authority; Patti Pakkala, Prince William County Park Authority; Kate Rudacille, Northern Virginia Regional Park Authority; Jennifer Wampler, Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation; and Greg Weiler, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. The report is an NVRC staff product, supported with funds provided through a cooperative agreement with the National Capital Region National Park Service. Any assessments, conclusions, or recommendations contained in this report represent the results of the NVRC staff’s technical investigation and do not represent policy positions of the Northern Virginia Regional Commission unless so stated in an adopted resolution of said Commission. The views expressed in this document are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the jurisdictions, the National Park Service, or any of its sub agencies. Funding for this report was through a cooperative agreement with The National Park Service Report prepared by: Debbie Spiliotopoulos, Senior Environmental Planner Northern Virginia Regional Commission with assistance from Samantha Kinzer, Environmental Planner The Northern Virginia Regional Commission 3060 Williams Drive, Suite 510 Fairfax, VA 22031 703.642.0700 www.novaregion.org Page 2 Northern Virginia Regional Commission As of May 2011 Chairman Hon.
    [Show full text]
  • Benthic Tmdls for the Goose Creek Watershed
    Benthic TMDLs for the Goose Creek Watershed Submitted by Virginia Department of Environmental Quality Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation Prepared by Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin March 1, 2004 Revised April 27, 2004 ICPRB Report 04-5 This report has been prepared by the staff of the Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin. Support was provided by the Virginia Department of Environment Quality and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. The opinions expressed are those of the authors and should not be construed as representing the opinions or policies of the United States or any of its agencies, the several states, or the Commissioners of the Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin. Benthic TMDLs for the Goose Creek Watershed Submitted by Virginia Department of Environmental Quality Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation Prepared by Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin March 1, 2004 Revised April 27, 2004 __________________________________________ Benthic TMDLs For the Goose Creek Watershed TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ........................................................................................................I LIST OF TABLES ................................................................................................................IV LIST OF FIGURES ..............................................................................................................VI EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Middle Potomac River Watershed Assessment: Potomac River Sustainable Flow and Water Resources Analysis
    Middle Potomac River Watershed Assessment: Potomac River Sustainable Flow and Water Resources Analysis April 2014 Middle Potomac River Watershed Assessment: Potomac River Sustainable Flow and Water Resources Analysis United States Army Corps of Engineers, Baltimore District The Natural Conservancy Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin Final Report April 2014 Recommended citation: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, The Nature Conservancy, and Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin. 2014. Middle Potomac River Watershed Assessment: Potomac River Sustainable Flow and Water Resources Analysis. Final Report. 107 pp. and 11 appendices. Cover photograph: Great Falls on the Potomac River as seen from Virginia. Jim Palmer (ICPRB) Middle Potomac River Watershed Assessment Abstract The Middle Potomac River Watershed Assessment (MPRWA) was a collaborative effort to assess the relationship between streamflow alteration and ecological response in the Potomac River and its tributaries in a study area defined as the Middle Potomac. The assessment is comprised of five distinct components: (1) a large river environmental flow needs assessment, (2) a stream and small rivers environmental flow needs assessment, (3) a projection of future water uses, (4) a stakeholder engagement process, and (5) development of a concept or scope for a strategic comprehensive plan for watershed management. This information can be used to balance and mitigate water use conflicts and prevent ecological degradation. To assess flow needs in the Potomac watershed, the Ecologically Sustainable Water Management (ESWM) approach was used for large rivers and the Ecological Limits of Hydrologic Alteration (ELOHA) framework was adapted for streams and small rivers. In the large rivers included in this study, based on currently available information, there has been no discernible adverse ecological impact on focal species due to human modification of flows.
    [Show full text]
  • Attachment C Receiving Waters by Watershed
    ATTACHMENT C RECEIVING WATERS BY WATERSHED ACCOTINK CREEK ACCOTINK BAY ACCOTINK CREEK BEAR BRANCH CALAMO RUN COON BRANCH CROOK BRANCH DANIELS RUN FIELD LARK BRANCH FLAG RUN GUNSTON COVE HUNTERS BRANCH KERNAN RUN LAKE ACCOTINK LONG BRANCH MASON RUN POHICK BAY TURKEY RUN BELLE HAVEN CAMERON RUN HUNTING CREEK POTOMAC RIVER QUANDER BROOK BULL NECK RUN BLACK POND BULLNECK RUN POTOMAC RIVER BULL RUN BULL RUN CAMERON RUN BACKLICK RUN CAMERON RUN COW BRANCH FAIRVIEW LAKE HOLMES RUN INDIAN RUN LAKE BARCROFT PIKES BRANCH POPLAR RUN TRIPPS RUN TURKEYCOCK CREEK TURKEYCOCK RUN Page 1 of 12 CUB RUN BIG ROCKY RUN BULL RUN CAIN BRANCH CUB RUN DEAD RUN ELKLICK RUN FLATLICK BRANCH FROG BRANCH OXLICK BRANCH ROCKY RUN ROUND LICK ROUND RUN SAND BRANCH SCHNEIDER BRANCH UPPER OCCOQUAN SEWAGE AUTHORITY DEAD RUN DEAD RUN POTOMAC RIVER DIFFICULT RUN ANGELICO BRANCH BRIDGE BRANCH BROWNS BRANCH CAPTAIN HICKORY RUN COLVIN MILL RUN COLVIN RUN DIFFICULT RUN DOG RUN FOX LAKE HICKORY RUN LAKE ANNE LAKE AUDUBON LAKE FAIRFAX LAKE NEWPORT LAKE THOREAU LITTLE DIFFICULT RUN MOONAC CREEK OLD COURTHOUSE SPRING BRANCH PINEY BRANCH PINEY RUN POTOMAC RIVER ROCKY BRANCH ROCKY RUN SHARPERS RUN SNAKEDEN BRANCH SOUTH FORK RUN Page 2 of 12 THE GLADE TIMBER LAKE WOLFTRAP CREEK WOLFTRAP RUN WOODSIDE LAKE DOGUE CREEK ACCOTINK BAY BARNYARD RUN DOGUE CREEK DOGUE RUN GUNSTON COVE LAKE D'EVEREUX NORTH FORK DOGUE CREEK PINEY RUN POTOMAC RIVER FOUR MILE RUN CAMERON RUN FOUR MILE RUN HUNTING CREEK LONG BRANCH POTOMAC RIVER HIGH POINT BELMONT BAY GUNSTON COVE MASON NECK OCCOQUAN BAY POHICK BAY
    [Show full text]
  • A Water-Quality Study of the Tidal Potomac River and Estuary an Overview
    A WATER-QUALITY STUDY OF THE TIDAL POTOMAC RIVER AND ESTUARY AN OVERVIEW * *- » -/ ,,*¥ if** v. < , ' ^ J V T * ' V-^^VX » «>* (>.> V A WATER-QUALITY STUDY OF THE TIDAL POTOMAC RIVER AND ESTUARY AN OVERVIEW Edited by Edward Callender, Virginia Carter, D. C. Hahl, Kerie Hitt, and Barbara I. Schultz U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WATER-SUPPLY PAPER 2233 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR WILLIAM P. CLARK, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Dallas L. Peck, Director UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE: 1984 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 This interdisciplinary effort emphasized studies FOREWORD of the transport of the major nutrient species and of suspended sediment. The movement of these sub­ Tidal rivers and estuaries are very important stances through five major reaches or control volumes features of the Coastal Zone because of their immense of the tidal Potomac River and Estuary was determined biological productivity and their proximity to centers of during 1980 and 1981. This effort provided a commerce and population. Most of the shellfish and framework on which to assemble a variety of investiga­ much of the local finfish consumed by man are harvest­ tions: ed from estuaries and tidal rivers. Many of the world's (1) The generation and deposition of sediments, largest shipping ports are located within estuaries. nutrients, and trace metals from the Holocene to the Many estuaries originate as river valleys drowned by present was determined by sampling surficial bottom rising sea level and are geologically ephemeral features, sediments and analyzing their characteristics and distri­ destined eventually to fill with sediments.
    [Show full text]
  • New Insights: Case Study Locations Executive Summary Expanding Population, Increased Fertilizer Use, and More 5 Livestock May Counteract Water Quality Improvements
    A tool for watershed management Adjusting our course New Insights summarizes the changes in water quality resulting from The examination of water quality monitoring data associated with best New nutrient reducing practices in more than 40 Chesapeake Bay watershed case management practice implementation in the Chesapeake Bay watershed studies. In many examples, water quality monitoring data reveal the benefits reveals multiple implications for continued efforts in Bay restoration: of restoration practices aimed at reducing nutrient and sediment pollution Investments in sewage treatment plants provide rapid water flowing into our local waters. Insights: quality improvements. 1 The science-based evidence summarized here shows that: National requirements of the Clean Air Act are benefitting the Science-based evidence of • Several groups of pollution-reducing practices, also known as best management 2 Chesapeake Bay watershed. practices or BMPS, are effective at improving water quality and habitats; water quality improvements, Some agricultural practices are providing local benefits • Specific challenges can still impede water quality improvements; and challenges, and opportunities 3 to streams. • More practices that focus on the impacts of intensified agriculture and urban and in the Chesapeake suburban development are needed for healthier waters. Lag times that delay improvements mean patience and persistence 4 are needed to realize the results of our efforts. New Insights: Case study locations Executive Summary Expanding population, increased fertilizer use, and more 5 livestock may counteract water quality improvements. NEW YORK Science should be better used to guide restoration choices and 6 subsequent monitoring is needed to evaluate effectiveness. Proven and innovative stormwater management practices need Sinnemahoning Creek to be implemented and evaluated to maintain and improve Bay 7 health as urban and suburban development expands.
    [Show full text]
  • Existing Environment
    Chapter 3 Bill Wallen Northern flicker Existing Environment ■ Introduction ■ Regional Setting ■ Socioeconomic Setting ■ Special Regional Conservation Areas and Activities ■ Potomac River Refuge Complex Administration ■ Mason Neck Refuge Environment ■ Featherstone Refuge Environment Introduction Introduction This chapter describes the physical, biological, and social environments of Mason Neck and Featherstone Refuges. The environment of the third refuge in the Potomac River Refuge Complex—Occoquan Bay Refuge—is described in a separate CCP for that refuge (USFWS, 1997). Specifically included in this chapter are descriptions of the regional and refuge settings, current refuge administration, and refuge resources and programs. In particular, we describe components of the biological diversity, integrity, and environmental health of these refuges because these details are crucial in planning for their future management under the provisions of the Refuge System Administration Act (16 U.S.C. § 668dd-668ee) and other laws. Appendix F provides an informative overview of the cultural resources on both refuges. Regional Setting Tidal Potomac River Basin The Potomac River begins in West Virginia and is fed by tributaries from Pennsylvania, Maryland, and Virginia. It flows over 380 miles from its headwaters, expanding to more than 11 miles wide as it flows into the Chesapeake Bay. The Potomac River Basin (see map 1.4) includes 14,670 square miles in four states including Virginia (5,723 square miles), Maryland (3,818 square miles), West Virginia (3,490 square miles), Pennsylvania (1,570 square miles), and the District of Columbia (69 square miles) (Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin ICPRB, 2006). The tidal Potomac River includes that portion of the river influenced by tides and extends for 117 miles from its head-of-tide, located approximately 1⁄ 2-mile upstream of Chain Bridge in the District of Columbia, to its mouth at Point Lookout in Maryland and Smith Point in Virginia.
    [Show full text]