U N S U U S E U R a C S

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

U N S U U S E U R a C S New Windsor ALLEGANY Paw Paw M ARYLAND Woodsboro VIRGI WES T NIA Sleepy Creek Lake Boonsboro Myersville MORGAN 108th Congress of the United States Keedysville Walkersville Cac ap Martinsburg on Discovery- Rive Clover r Antietam Natl Battlefield Spring Garden Sharpsburg Hill Middletown Fort Detrick Military Res Shepherdstown Rohrersville CARROLL Frederick Linganore- Lake Bartonsville Linganore New Braddock Market Burkittsville Heights BERKELEY Ballenger Creek Mount WASHINGTON Airy d R e ill v SR 127 s n i l l o C Inwood Green Valley W G r M e FREDERICK e E HAMPSHIRE n A S S R p T Y Rosemont r WEST VIRGINIA L i A n V ND g IR R G d IN Bolivar IA HOWARD VIRGINIA d R e r Dr d c Brunswick w R Harpers a t ie i v e h La k e d g Corporation d Ferry R i W JEFFERSON R r e of Ranson l g i t n S i u t n n t d 522 u Ch s r urch R Eb eneze Rd e H Capon h e v C r o Bridge F G r ed er ic k d P R le k d vil e R s d d tt Damascus R R y e Charles r v e e r v o g e L o r d F Lovettsville i Town G R s r r e e i a p d P r e a e l C H p p ) A d e R k P n s w r o e t p l r l d a e e C k R ( W te 25 9 P n tR i S g a r t u n b u A s o in M I In rt 50 di a d an Rd R N H M n N k o oll w e r ow T I re th s e C w R rle k d p k e ha Clarksburg G d c s C T a A te ld R B r 11 O in R y I n l y r t Barnesville I P l e a w N k y e B H Laytonsville V I o d L R e y o rr T G r e n s F S R o ink Sp E I M V d s 81 R e W h Hillsboro c m r u a h J C Amh s er m s u Purcellville Rd Little Seneca t 7 (B r St StRte err StRt yvill C e Lake e Pke) 9 7 ( Montgomery 3 C d WINCHESTER h e R t a ain rl Germantown t Winchester e Village 340 d n tR u M s o S R T i l d l l M l i o FREDERICK w R w k Ave c M o o r n a s o o P B d b O r k s d l e e l l i ) d e h H W v p A e l Rd h hoo a Sc t y S Allder e e r l f l o a r d V d S Berryville R rd ensen R G y Rd d Gaithersburg rd ffe d le G li R MONTGOMERY il k k p s v e ic a Olney en e tRte 7 (H rd r M W G S arr a C s y By r i r Washington W a ll m d d w lia Hw 15 Poolesville Clopper e il y) F o Grove C o W Lake r o d Round Hill n Ln P Redland in t k ta R y n e Purcellville L aurel o w Hamilton u L G H e o ro y v yrd e M e a H ry B t ar s a Rd l y ) wy b re d P H R w rd u G k y Sleeter le H B r d e ry g id x r a Lake S T L a B M f H i e r ( p e n i y S 7 r l c S eg a t i o t p R e n Pk t R F l g d n ( t r M e y s a t rd R a 7 e p R R S ll o s rk B h d e u 522 L g d a CLARKE n g t s d i n S V r i t) R p ) t P K Lo a S d c R n x ke d d s t ’s M iver Rd er o on t R i R eph Rd o Harmony Church Rd 5 ll h m c ) R r l e 5 e d S i Darnestown k Si P 2 d d A ille a o StRtes v55 te e o Leesburg n G North Potomac de r Cr Stephens tR M Aspen ar a S p W d Boyce o Rockville ( e City h C is Hill (B HARDY n d L S tRte R 2 e e 7 7 b v (F e ai y F l o rfax P k w o G M C e Calm Rd e g A ) s e d s H nt Gi lea g R Ne n u d y x ck r L y o Y n R d u L a d f M A r B b a i l e ND o a e g P t d F t h i Potomac River o V R m S I d W R r t D n o a G o R I L o N u s StRte 7 (Harry Byrd Hwy) I b m A 81 d l 11 l e hi e B ng Travilah C to h Snickersville Tpke n lgon kian u & A Pk r O w c ld y h 17 D North R o d m y d R in kw A io in n P Bethesda s s S ta B d n h ik e a u LOUDOUN R o b e d l M T u a e e J e r g Trappe Rd l c t o d r m i S Middletown a hn R n s tR G a e R te d M M C lu C a e o DISTRICT L d rs 5 h s B ime Kiln R d h 5 u R b a r y l ( c H l J Main St h H o w d w h R R E n d y y n v ) e e Potomac r d g r a r St Louis Rd e g e n 10 n W l Rd e ax p oo M e r i l Great Falls G l Sugarland Rd s F o R x d Beaver Dam c ) d R r o Reservoir d R e f y l 8 R ia t StRte 193 w R 2 ( n w Leesburg Pke G o 66 ce e l e d d d 2 Stuart Rd Walker Rd R l o d H d i r a R R g e v e e e d n t t s o Cedar Cr er R o o w M d R t r s e R t n g s e t d ll n n P i a S n e n k G v o a s Ryan Rd a e o h ll u r Bethesda a e W ) L r c ckl w M d d n o R D H o ( Bethesda Ship i s ill R H x R e O Research and d W d m l Development Ctr a O North Fork Shenandoah R Joh J Cabin n M Baron Cameron Ave Strasburg M Blu e o John ou d sby Glen S nt ain R Hwy Herndon tRt Echo e 5 5 (S Colvin Run O Somerset tra S l s S 50 Fairfax County Pkwy tR d b h t D Brook- e Middleburg John Mosby Hwy H e o u r na d e 7 m 495 mont g Rd) n R rn ( in do r W P do L i ah Riv e w kw n Wolf e on i a y e n s D h b r George Washington c s u n Mem Pkwy h StR Trap rg M e e te r 2 P o s 6 C D 7 u t u k e lle (W e n s d St A as n ) t r hi to Wolf Trap DISTRICT a d Monroe c n g R R ce i ) Farm Pk n R Reston ss d d e & T l R d a o l Toms Brook R k D.C. a d r o MARYLAND 6 t G A Ln e d n McLean n a l la e r k p r DISTRICT a u d P l B y e R e D e l l l StRte 28 (Sully Rd) l Front i a F V v 8 o D.C. V e x I R r R ld e t M Royal c n t W i G o e l O r d l to H O w C R I R n R a x d iv Ave Royal R N e R a l f r l d l w m d d u a I SHENANDOAH o Pimmit WARREN Z y A n G nR Tysons t D R i Hills Haycock r u a d Fairfax County Pkwy t S (Joh m Rd t n M n Corner 37th Rd N Rte 5 5 arsha Braddock Rd ll u Hwy) S Arlington o p Folkstone Dr Westmoreland St M r 15 i L n Vienna ee Hwy ogm g L 11 ill Rd R d Dunn 29 Lee Jackson Memorial Hwy Loring 66 d ARLINGTON d R Falls R Oakton d y ) e FAUQUIER 2 3 d e 1 dl Rd R ll te R Church n Re n n a W Ox Rd dge Idylwood a m u L o V R ri o e t t t B h u R g n S n n e in a n t y d r s i 81 Main St Woodstock a R r s r a e a a P d i M h opewell R Catharpin Cr e H l F C d a C P ( n S o Chantilly Jefferson Blvd r S n k tR 50 Arlingto y R te 55 (John Marsh Merrifield l a i ll Seven Corners d n Hw e in y) P D d d y R M a The o r R e 4 s 4 m St StR B Mantua 2 n a te t te Plains James Madison Hwy u Fairfax R R 2 O t w 3 l S 4 l y f o R w f t (S u i c H d u n le Legend (Columbia Pke) n y e W n so w Rd ) R Lake Barcroft ck ro in d Centreville a B c l J h Bailey’s Crossroads l e 45 66 a s 2 ) w t d ALEXANDRI e e te R Lake n r Lee Hwy o R n t R t r Barcroft e Annandale S S P d v a 29 395 d Z a g e a e Rd T R Ln DISTRICT um l FAIRFAX c H d n a d n L k R l o it t tle O d o ( n 10 Rive r S n r T y a pk e e B B 495 T e ’ en r Lincolnia a y to F O n y w l d Manassas Natl k v ill o R Little Bull Run P e-B r Ada Rd Battlefield Pk l l Pageland r o il ria w H H o DISTRICT nt w t m Edinburg o s Ln e North Springfield w e M Centreville Rd y Alexandria n R r s d d i C Haymarket st DISTRICT 2 R u C C Wilson Rd n y ALEXANDRIA a u p w R 66 11 it a s H Rappahannock R r d Loch l e n KANSAS B t R elt r o l w 522 l a y a i Lomond y is a C tw d M el 340 Lp Lake ital B or a s OKLAHOMA Cap n y Gainesville St Accotink a M Blantyre Rd R e t l e M r 2 y s 3 e 4 Sudley Burke e e v Wellington Rd B Rose Hill n y Yorkshire West Springfield e o m p B o a G J G e o ERIE Springfield Clifton S r g Bull West Gate B tR e u t l t Crest Hill Rd o Lake l R e 17 w Run u 1 n n 2 Manassas 3 R ( Lieber Army d MANASSAS O Reserve Ctr Hwy PARK x e R Le W d Franconia el ) Groveton Linton Hall ling Manassas PAGE ton PRINCE Burke Rd Park Lake 29 WILLIAM Hybla Kennedy Rd Telecom and Info Systems S Fort Belvoir tR Hornbaker Military Res Command(Alexandria Station) Valley te Rd Turley Vint Hill Rd 2 Godwin Dr Mitchell Harrison Rd 1 5 MANASSAS (V in t Manassas Newington D H Cannonball Gate Rd um ill Fort fries Rd Rd) Rogues Rd Belvoir Bear Wallow Rd 211 D DISTRICT u mf U S Hwy 29 Business Rd r i 211 e Broad Run s 7 Warrenton Broad Run Old Waterloo Rd Mount Vernon Washington Shirley Justice Occoquan y A v d) Reservoir w e E Lee St R H Fort Belvoir Shenandoah Natl Pk le d p l Lake n i Lorton o Military Res y sv m B e Jackson ok h Dogue n N ic r ( Creek y 8 Fort Belvoir R w e 2 H t tRte ee s S Nokesville Lake Ridge L a 1 Location of Virginia’s 10th Congressional District - 11 Districts Total RAPPAHANNOCK E Occoquan River 15 DISTRICT Occoquan 95 StRte 242 y (Gunston Rd) 83 W82 W80 W79 W77 W76 W Lee Hwy NEW w 1 S Yosemite NP Gunston H t n R Cove JERSEY o t PRINCE WILLIAM e s t i S 2 in MARYLAND d Ma 3 a 4 M Luray ( OHIO s D e 39 N 39 N u CULPEPER m 211 DC m a f 10 J r Occoquan i y e w Interstate Hwy Other Major Road s H River Waters Body 44 8 R i DELA- v 11 d Dale City a ) Other Road WA R E D n Woodbridge o s r U.S.
Recommended publications
  • UPPER SHENANDOAH RIVER BASIN Drought Preparedness and Response Plan
    UPPER SHENANDOAH RIVER BASIN Drought Preparedness and Response Plan Prepared by Updated June 2012 Upper Shenandoah River Basin Drought Preparedness and Response Plan (This page intentionally left blank) June 2011 Page 2 Upper Shenandoah River Basin Drought Preparedness and Response Plan Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction................................................................................................................................... 5 2.0 Historical Background .................................................................................................................. 6 3.0 Drought Response Stage Declaration, Implementation and Response Measures.......................... 8 Drought Declaration .................................................................................................................... 10 Drought Indicators ....................................................................................................................... 10 Drought Response Stages and Response Measures ..................................................................... 10 4.0 Drought Response Stage Termination .......................................................................................... 11 5.0 Plan Revisions ............................................................................................................................... 11 Appendix A Locality Drought Watch, Warning and Emergency Indicators Appendix B Drought Watch Responses and Water Conservation Measures Appendix C Drought Warning Responses
    [Show full text]
  • Shoreline Situation Report Counties of Fairfax and Arlington, City of Alexandria
    W&M ScholarWorks Reports 1979 Shoreline Situation Report Counties of Fairfax and Arlington, City of Alexandria Dennis W. Owen Virginia Institute of Marine Science Lynne C. Morgan Virginia Institute of Marine Science Nancy M. Sturm Virginia Institute of Marine Science Robert J. Byrne Virginia Institute of Marine Science Carl H. Hobbs III Virginia Institute of Marine Science Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/reports Part of the Environmental Indicators and Impact Assessment Commons, Natural Resources Management and Policy Commons, and the Water Resource Management Commons Recommended Citation Owen, D. W., Morgan, L. C., Sturm, N. M., Byrne, R. J., & Hobbs, C. H. (1979) Shoreline Situation Report Counties of Fairfax and Arlington, City of Alexandria. Special Report tn Applied Marine Science and Ocean Engineering No. 166. Virginia Institute of Marine Science, William & Mary. https://doi.org/10.21220/ V5K134 This Report is brought to you for free and open access by W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Reports by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Shoreline Situation Report COUNTIES OF FAIRFAX AND ARLINGTON, CITY OF ALEXANDRIA Prepared and Published With Funds Provided to the Commonwealth by the Office of Coastal Zone Management, National Oceanic and Atmospheric·Administration, Grant Nos. 04-7-158-44041 and 04-8-M01-309 Special Report In Applied Marine Science and Ocean Engineering Number 166 of the VIRGINIA INSTITUTE OF MARINE SCIENCE Gloucester Point, Virginia 23062 1979 Shoreline Situation Report COUNTIES OF FAIRFAX AND ARLINGTON, CITY OF AL.EXANDRIA Prepared by: Dennis W.
    [Show full text]
  • State Water Control Board Page 1 O F16 9 Vac 25-260-350 and 400 Water Quality Standards
    STATE WATER CONTROL BOARD PAGE 1 O F16 9 VAC 25-260-350 AND 400 WATER QUALITY STANDARDS 9 VAC 25-260-350 Designation of nutrient enriched waters. A. The following state waters are hereby designated as "nutrient enriched waters": * 1. Smith Mountain Lake and all tributaries of the impoundment upstream to their headwaters; 2. Lake Chesdin from its dam upstream to where the Route 360 bridge (Goodes Bridge) crosses the Appomattox River, including all tributaries to their headwaters that enter between the dam and the Route 360 bridge; 3. South Fork Rivanna Reservoir and all tributaries of the impoundment upstream to their headwaters; 4. New River and its tributaries, except Peak Creek above Interstate 81, from Claytor Dam upstream to Big Reed Island Creek (Claytor Lake); 5. Peak Creek from its headwaters to its mouth (confluence with Claytor Lake), including all tributaries to their headwaters; 6. Aquia Creek from its headwaters to the state line; 7. Fourmile Run from its headwaters to the state line; 8. Hunting Creek from its headwaters to the state line; 9. Little Hunting Creek from its headwaters to the state line; 10. Gunston Cove from its headwaters to the state line; 11. Belmont and Occoquan Bays from their headwaters to the state line; 12. Potomac Creek from its headwaters to the state line; 13. Neabsco Creek from its headwaters to the state line; 14. Williams Creek from its headwaters to its confluence with Upper Machodoc Creek; 15. Tidal freshwater Rappahannock River from the fall line to Buoy 44, near Leedstown, Virginia, including all tributaries to their headwaters that enter the tidal freshwater Rappahannock River; 16.
    [Show full text]
  • Authorization to Discharge Under the Virginia Stormwater Management Program and the Virginia Stormwater Management Act
    COMMONWEALTHof VIRGINIA DEPARTMENTOFENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY Permit No.: VA0088587 Effective Date: April 1, 2015 Expiration Date: March 31, 2020 AUTHORIZATION TO DISCHARGE UNDER THE VIRGINIA STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PROGRAM AND THE VIRGINIA STORMWATER MANAGEMENT ACT Pursuant to the Clean Water Act as amended and the Virginia Stormwater Management Act and regulations adopted pursuant thereto, the following owner is authorized to discharge in accordance with the effluent limitations, monitoring requirements, and other conditions set forth in this state permit. Permittee: Fairfax County Facility Name: Fairfax County Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System County Location: Fairfax County is 413.15 square miles in area and is bordered by the Potomac River to the East, the city of Alexandria and the county of Arlington to the North, the county of Loudoun to the West, and the county of Prince William to the South. The owner is authorized to discharge from municipal-owned storm sewer outfalls to the surface waters in the following watersheds: Watersheds: Stormwater from Fairfax County discharges into twenty-two 6lh order hydrologic units: Horsepen Run (PL18), Sugarland Run (PL21), Difficult Run (PL22), Potomac River- Nichols Run-Scott Run (PL23), Potomac River-Pimmit Run (PL24), Potomac River- Fourmile Run (PL25), Cameron Run (PL26), Dogue Creek (PL27), Potomac River-Little Hunting Creek (PL28), Pohick Creek (PL29), Accotink Creek (PL30),(Upper Bull Run (PL42), Middle Bull Run (PL44), Cub Run (PL45), Lower Bull Run (PL46), Occoquan River/Occoquan Reservoir (PL47), Occoquan River-Belmont Bay (PL48), Potomac River- Occoquan Bay (PL50) There are 15 major streams: Accotink Creek, Bull Run, Cameron Run (Hunting Creek), Cub Run, Difficult Run, Dogue Creek, Four Mile Run, Horsepen Run, Little Hunting Creek, Little Rocky Run, Occoquan Receiving Streams: River, Pimmit run, Pohick creek, Popes Head Creek, Sugarland Run, and various other minor streams.
    [Show full text]
  • River Watch Summer 2006
    Vol. 3 Summer 2006 River Watch 1 River Watch Volume 3 Summer 2006 Governor Visits New Shenandoah Riverkeeper Jeff Kelble had been the Shenandoah Riverkeeper for two weeks when Virginia Governor Timothy Kaine, US Senator Russ Potts, and Secretary of Natural Resource Preston Bryant flew from Richmond to hold a meeting at his bed and breakfast. The Governor wanted to be briefed on the status of the ongoing fish kills on the Shenandoah River, and he wanted to hear from citizens who had personally been affected by the rivers problems. Evi- dently Jeffs story rang true: man runs fishing guide service on the Shenandoah, businessman buys old house in Shenandoah Valley and renovates for two years to open B&B to cater to fishermen, fish kills occur, mans dreams dashed. Jeff has served on the Virginia Fish Kill Task Force since its inception, originally as a fishing guide but now as the Shenandoah Riverkeeper. The Fish Kill Task Force is composed of State environment and game Governor Kaine discusses Shenandoah fish health. officials, Shenandoah Valley non-profit conservation groups, federal fish pathology experts, federal water chemistry experts, university scientists and Jeff. Out of the task force has come several studies to determine why Shenandoah fish were forming lesions and dying. The studies have been underway since April and the task force is scheduled to run out of money at the end of the summer. This is why the Governors help is needed. Jeff reports that the meeting was strong and that the Governor had very good answers to his three questions.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Development of Shenandoah River
    SDMS DocID 2109708 Decision Rationale Total Maximum Daily Load of Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) for the Shenandoah River, Virginia and West Virginia I. Introduction The Clean Water Act (CWA) requires a Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) be developed for those water bodies identified as impaired by the state where technology-based and other controls did not provide for attainment of water quality standards. A TMDL is a determination of the amount of a pollutant from point, nonpoint, and natural background sources, including a margin of safety, that may be discharged to a water qualit>'-limited water body. This document will set forth the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) rationale for establishing the Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) of PGBs for the Shenandoah River. EPA's rationale is based on the determination that the TMDL meets the following 8 regulatory conditions pursuant to 40 CFR §130. 1) The TMDL is designed to implement applicable water quality standards. 2) The TMDL includes a total allowable load as well as individual waste load allocations and load allocations. 3) The TMDL considers the impacts of background pollutant contributions. 4) The TMDL considers critical environmental conditions. 5) The TMDL considers seasonal environmental variations. 6) The TMDL includes a margin of safety. 7) The TMDL has been subject to public participation. 8) There is reasonable assurance that the TMDL can be met. II. Background The Shenandoah River drains 1,957,690 acres of land. The watershed can be broken down into several land-uses. Forest and agricultural lands make-up roughly 1,800,000 acres of watershed.
    [Show full text]
  • Fish Consumption Advisories Available for 2010
    Fish Consumption Advisories Available for 2010 The West Virginia Department of Health and Human Resources (DHHR) has updated the West Virginia Sport Fish Consumption Advisory for 2010. West Virginia DHHR, through an interagency agreement, partners with the West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) and the Division of Natural Resources (DNR) to develop consumption advisories for fish caught in West Virginia. Fish consumption advisories are reviewed annually and help West Virginia anglers make educated choices about eating the fish they catch. Certain West Virginia sport fish have been found to have low levels of chemicals like polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), mercury, selenium and dioxin. To protect the good health of West Virginians, the West Virginia DHHR offers an advisory for how often these fish can be safely eaten. An advisory is advice, and should not be viewed as law or regulation. It is intended to help anglers and their families make educated choices about: where to fish, what types of fish to eat, how to limit the amount and frequency of fish eaten, and how to prepare and cook fish to reduce contaminants. This advisory covers only sport fish caught in West Virginia waters. Safety regulations and advisories for fish in the market place are the responsibility of the Federal Food and Drug Administration (FDA). For more information you can contact the FDA at: http://www.fda.gov/Food/ResourcesForYou/Consumers/ucm110591.htm The following updated 2010 advisory recommendation is the result of reviewing new and recent fish tissue data. Data collected from lakes and rivers in West Virginia show that a general statewide advisory of sport‐caught fish is appropriate.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary of Water Resource and Related Data in Loudoun County, VA
    Summary of Water Resource and Related Data in Loudoun County, VA Prepared by: Loudoun County Department of Building & Development Water Resources Team September, 2008 Loudoun County - Water Resources Data Summary 1 Groundwater Data .................................................................................................................................................................................... 3 1.1 Loudoun County Groundwater, Well, and Pollution Sources ......................................................................................................... 3 1.2 USGS Groundwater Wells ................................................................................................................................................................ 3 1.3 County Hydrogeologic Studies ......................................................................................................................................................... 3 1.4 USGS NAWQA Wells ..................................................................................................................................................................... 3 1.5 WRMP Monitoring Wells................................................................................................................................................................. 3 1.6 Water Quality Data from LCSA and VADH Public Water Supplies ............................................................................................. 3 1.7 Luck Stone Special Exception Water Quality Reports ...................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Prince William County Tidal Marsh Inventory
    W&M ScholarWorks Reports 5-1975 Prince William County Tidal Marsh Inventory Kenneth A. Moore Virginia Institute of Marine Science Gene M. Silberhorn Virginia Institute of Marine Science Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/reports Part of the Terrestrial and Aquatic Ecology Commons Recommended Citation Moore, K. A., & Silberhorn, G. M. (1975) Prince William County Tidal Marsh Inventory. Special Report in Applied Marine Science and Ocean Engineering No. 78. Virginia Institute of Marine Science, College of William and Mary. https://doi.org/10.21220/V55H9H This Report is brought to you for free and open access by W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Reports by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. PRINCE WILLIAM COUNTY TIDAL MARSH INVENTORY Special Report No. 78 in Applied Marine Science and Ocean Engineering Kenneth A. Moore G.M. Silberhorn , Project Leader VIRGINIA INSTITUTE OF MARINE SCIENCE Gloucester Point, Virginia 23062 Dr. William J. Hargis, Jr., Director MAY 1975 Acknowledgments Funds for the publication and distribution of this report have been provided by the Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Office of Coastal Zone Management, Grant No. 04-5-158-5001. I would like to express my sincerest gratitude to Dr. Gene M. Silberhorn. His invaluable guidance and assistance made this report possible. I wish also to thank Col. George Dawes, for his review of this report and his assistance in the field and Dr. William J. Hargis, Dr. Michael E. Bender, Mr. James Mercer, Mr. Thomas Barnard, Miss Christine Plummer and Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Brook Trout Outcome Management Strategy
    Brook Trout Outcome Management Strategy Introduction Brook Trout symbolize healthy waters because they rely on clean, cold stream habitat and are sensitive to rising stream temperatures, thereby serving as an aquatic version of a “canary in a coal mine”. Brook Trout are also highly prized by recreational anglers and have been designated as the state fish in many eastern states. They are an essential part of the headwater stream ecosystem, an important part of the upper watershed’s natural heritage and a valuable recreational resource. Land trusts in West Virginia, New York and Virginia have found that the possibility of restoring Brook Trout to local streams can act as a motivator for private landowners to take conservation actions, whether it is installing a fence that will exclude livestock from a waterway or putting their land under a conservation easement. The decline of Brook Trout serves as a warning about the health of local waterways and the lands draining to them. More than a century of declining Brook Trout populations has led to lost economic revenue and recreational fishing opportunities in the Bay’s headwaters. Chesapeake Bay Management Strategy: Brook Trout March 16, 2015 - DRAFT I. Goal, Outcome and Baseline This management strategy identifies approaches for achieving the following goal and outcome: Vital Habitats Goal: Restore, enhance and protect a network of land and water habitats to support fish and wildlife, and to afford other public benefits, including water quality, recreational uses and scenic value across the watershed. Brook Trout Outcome: Restore and sustain naturally reproducing Brook Trout populations in Chesapeake Bay headwater streams, with an eight percent increase in occupied habitat by 2025.
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Resources Technical Report
    TRANSFORM 66 OUTSIDE the Beltway I-66 CORRIDOR 66 IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT Multimodal Solutions - 495 to Haymarket Tier 2 Draft Environmental Assessment 193 Town of Natural Resources TechnicalTown of Report Middleburg Herndon LOUDOUN FAUQUIER 50 267 Washington Dulles McLean International Airport 309 28 286 Tysons Corner West Falls Church 7 Chantilly Dunn Loring FALLS 123 CHURCH 29 Vienna LOUDOUN Fair Lakes 50 FAIRFAX CO. 66 15 FAIRFAX CITY Centreville 286 29 236 Manassas National Battlefield Park Haymarket Fairfax Station Springfield 66 Gainesville 234 28 MANASSAS PARK PRINCE WILLIAM 29 FAUQUIER 234 123 286 215 Ft. Belvoir MANASSAS MAY 12, 2015 Tier 2 Draft Environmental Assessment Natural Resources Technical Report Draft – May 12, 2015 I-66 Corridor Improvements Project – Natural Resources Technical Report May 12, 2015 Table of Contents Chapter 1 – Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Project Description ..................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Methods ...................................................................................................................................... 1-2 Chapter 2 – Affected Environment ......................................................................................................... 2-1 2.1 Water Resources ......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Corridor Analysis for the Potomac Heritage National Scenic Trail in Northern Virginia
    Corridor Analysis For The Potomac Heritage National Scenic Trail In Northern Virginia June 2011 Acknowledgements The Northern Virginia Regional Commission (NVRC) wishes to acknowledge the following individuals for their contributions to this report: Don Briggs, Superintendent of the Potomac Heritage National Scenic Trail for the National Park Service; Liz Cronauer, Fairfax County Park Authority; Mike DePue, Prince William Park Authority; Bill Ference, City of Leesburg Park Director; Yon Lambert, City of Alexandria Department of Transportation; Ursula Lemanski, Rivers, Trails and Conservation Assistance Program for the National Park Service; Mark Novak, Loudoun County Park Authority; Patti Pakkala, Prince William County Park Authority; Kate Rudacille, Northern Virginia Regional Park Authority; Jennifer Wampler, Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation; and Greg Weiler, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. The report is an NVRC staff product, supported with funds provided through a cooperative agreement with the National Capital Region National Park Service. Any assessments, conclusions, or recommendations contained in this report represent the results of the NVRC staff’s technical investigation and do not represent policy positions of the Northern Virginia Regional Commission unless so stated in an adopted resolution of said Commission. The views expressed in this document are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the jurisdictions, the National Park Service, or any of its sub agencies. Funding for this report was through a cooperative agreement with The National Park Service Report prepared by: Debbie Spiliotopoulos, Senior Environmental Planner Northern Virginia Regional Commission with assistance from Samantha Kinzer, Environmental Planner The Northern Virginia Regional Commission 3060 Williams Drive, Suite 510 Fairfax, VA 22031 703.642.0700 www.novaregion.org Page 2 Northern Virginia Regional Commission As of May 2011 Chairman Hon.
    [Show full text]