DOCSLIB.ORG

Missisquoi Bay Basin Project: Short-Term Monitoring Program

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Missisquoi Bay Basin Project: Short-term Monitoring Program A Final Report to the International Joint Commission by the Lake Champlain Basin Program 12 August 2011 Prepared by: Eric Howe, LCBP Technical Coordinator Stephanie Strouse, LCBP Technical Associate William Howland, LCBP Program Manager 1 | Page Table of Contents List of Figures ..................................................................................................................................................... 3 List of Tables ....................................................................................................................................................... 3 Executive Summary ......................................................................................................................................... 4 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................................ 4 Intended Uses of Data ................................................................................................................................. 5 Water Quality Monitoring ............................................................................................................................. 5 Monitoring results ............................................................................................................................................ 9 Phosphorus, Nitrogen, Total Suspended Solids ................................................................................ 9 Review of other chemistry parameters ............................................................................................ 10 Loading calculations ................................................................................................................................. 13 Quality Control and QAPP adherence .................................................................................................... 14 Split-sampling exercise ........................................................................................................................... 15 Acknowledgements ....................................................................................................................................... 16 References ........................................................................................................................................................ 17 Appendices ....................................................................................................................................................... 18 Appendix A. Approved Quality Assurance Project Plan for the Short-term Monitoring Project .................................................................................................................................................... 18 Appendix B. EPA WQX Submission Confirmation ........................................................................ 18 Appendix C. Summary of water chemistry results for high-flow (Table C1), low-flow (Table C2), Spring 2011 floods (Table C3) and automated ISCO samples (Table C4) collected from 18 December 2009 to 28 May 2011. ........................................................... 18 Appendix D. Field Assessment to Determine Conformance to Approved QAPP .............. 18 Appendix E. QC data for the chemistry analyses. Field duplicates (Table E1) and field blanks (Table E2) ............................................................................................................................... 18 Appendix F. Cross-sectional profile data for Hungerford Brook, Black Creek, Tyler Branch, Trout Brook, Mud Creek ................................................................................................. 18 2 | Page List of Figures Figure 1. Locations of monitoring stations within the Missisquoi Bay watershed ................... 7 Figure 2. Hungerford Brook hydrograph for the duration of the project (Aug 2009- Aug 2011) with manual and automated sample collection dates. No samples were collected after June 1, 2011 due to laboratory turnaround times. ........................... 9 Figure 3. Mean Nitrogen concentrations across all monitoring locations, Dec. 2009- May 2011. Tributaries are arranged by decreasing mean daily discharge. Error bars are standard error. ........................................................................................................ 11 Figure 4. Mean Total Phosphorus Concentrations across all Monitoring Locations, Dec. 2009-May 2011. Tributaries are arranged by decreasing mean daily discharge. Error bars are standard error. .................................................................................. 12 Figure 5. Mean Total Suspended Sediment concentrations across all monitoring locations, Dec. 2009-May 2011. Tributaries are arranged by decreasing mean daily discharge. Error bars are standard error. ........................................................... 13 Figure 6. Comparison of Vermont and Québec laboratories for split-sampling Total Phosphorus samples. Results are in mg/L due to laboratory reporting constraints. ............................................................................................................................................. 16 List of Tables Table 1. Location information for the monitoring stations within the Missisquoi Bay watershed with type of monitoring data collected (meteorological [Met], chemistry [Chem], discharge [Q]) .................................................................................................... 6 Table 2. Sample Collection Date, Sample Type, and Quality Control sample collections (duplicate or blank) ........................................................................................................ 8 Table 3. Proportion of Mean Dissolved Phosphorus to Mean Total Phosphorus (in %) ............................................................................................................................................................... 10 Table 4. Flow-Weighted Total Nitrogen Loads ..................................................................................... 14 Table 5. Flow-Weighted Total Phosphorus Loads ............................................................................... 14 Table 6. Flow-Weighted Total Suspended Sediment Loads ............................................................. 14 3 | Page Executive Summary Missisquoi Bay, located in the northeastern portion of Lake Champlain, historically has the highest in-lake Phosphorus concentrations of Lake Champlain. Frequent blooms of cyanobacteria in Missisquoi Bay during the summer months compromise the recreational value of this resource to Québec and Vermont residents as well as tourists from other locations around northeastern North America. The International Joint Commission tasked the Lake Champlain Basin Program to initiate a two-year monitoring program of secondary tributaries to the Missisquoi River, the largest tributary to Missisquoi Bay and among the largest tributaries to Lake Champlain. This program was designed to complement and support the Long-Term Monitoring Program, in which monitoring data are collected for over 20 years from all of the major tributaries in the Lake Champlain basin. In this study, water chemistry monitoring stations were established near the mouth of five tributaries (Hungerford Brook, Black Creek, Tyler Branch, Trout Brook, and Mud Creek) to collect nutrient (Phosphorus, Nitrogen), sediment (Tsotal Suspended Solids) and other analytes (i.e. metals, chloride, alkalinity) to support ongoing research in this watershed. A total of 23 high-flow and 6 low-flow samples were collected from each of the five tributaries. An additional 54 samples were collected on Hungerford Brook by an automated sampler (ISCO) to augment the sample size for total Phosphorus and total suspended solids on this tributary. Monitoring data were reduced to high-flow, low-flow, and Spring 2011 flood events. Results from the study indicate that among the five tributaries, Hungerford Brook yielded the greatest mean concentrations for nearly all parameters measured in this study, including flow-weighted concentrations of total Phosphorus, total Nitrogen, and total suspended solids. Introduction Missisquoi Bay has one of the highest in-lake Phosphorus concentrations of any segment of Lake Champlain. Phosphorus loads to and concentrations in the Bay greatly exceed target levels designated by water quality criteria for Phosphorus endorsed by the governments of New York, Québec, and Vermont. Loads of sediment and Nitrogen to the Bay are also a concern. In 2008, the IJC was tasked with assisting in the implementation of a trans- boundary initiative to reduce Phosphorus loadings. Recognizing the recent advances made by the Province of Québec within its areas of jurisdiction, the IJC was requested to coordinate a number of tasks on the U.S. side of the border, in close partnership with the Lake Champlain Basin Program (LCBP). One such task was to establish water quality monitoring locations on tributaries within the Missisquoi Bay Basin to be sampled over a two-year period. Specific details of this project are provided in the approved Missisquoi Bay Basin Project: Short-term Monitoring Program 2009 Quality Assurance Project Plan (STM QAPP 2009, Appendix A); however, a brief overview of the project is provided below. The primary purpose for the two-year Monitoring Program described in this plan was
Recommended publications
  • Dams and Reservoirs in the Lake Champlain Richelieu River Basin

    Dams and Reservoirs in the Lake Champlain Richelieu River Basin

    JUST THE FACTS SERIES June 2019 DAMS AND RESERVOIRS IN THE LAKE CHAMPLAIN RICHELIEU RIVER BASIN MYTH Water released from tributary dams in the United States causes flooding in Lake Champlain and the Richelieu River. FACT Water levels in Lake Champlain and the Richelieu River Generally, mass releases of water from flood control are primarily affected by precipitation from rain or dams are avoided. In addition to compromising the snowmelt. structural integrity of the dams, mass releases would also endanger the very communities that these dams are built Because of its size, Lake Champlain can store a lot of to protect. water; the flood control dams and reservoirs in the basin, which are very small in comparison to the lake, do not When conditions force the release of more water than significantly change water levels of the lake and river as hydropower plants can handle, the increase in water they release water. levels immediately below the dam will be much greater than the increase on Lake Champlain. This is true even during high water and flooding events. Consider, for instance, when Lake Champlain and the Richelieu River experienced extreme flooding between April and June 2011, the additional releases flowing from Waterbury Reservoir—the largest flood control reservoir in the Vermont portion of the basin, contributed less than 2 centimetres (¾ inch) to the elevation of Lake Champlain and the upper Richelieu River. International Lake Champlain-Richelieu River Study Board FACT FACT Dams in the US portion of the basin are built for one of Waterbury Reservoir in Vermont is the largest reservoir two purposes: flood control or hydroelectric power.
  • The Vermont Management Plan for Brook, Brown and Rainbow Trout Vermont Fish and Wildlife Department January 2018

    The Vermont Management Plan for Brook, Brown and Rainbow Trout Vermont Fish and Wildlife Department January 2018

    The Vermont Management Plan for Brook, Brown and Rainbow Trout Vermont Fish and Wildlife Department January 2018 Prepared by: Rich Kirn, Fisheries Program Manager Reviewed by: Brian Chipman, Will Eldridge, Jud Kratzer, Bret Ladago, Chet MacKenzie, Adam Miller, Pete McHugh, Lee Simard, Monty Walker, Lael Will ACKNOWLEDGMENT: This project was made possible by fishing license sales and matching Dingell- Johnson/Wallop-Breaux funds available through the Federal Sportfish Restoration Act. Table of Contents I. Introduction ......................................................................................... 1 II. Life History and Ecology ................................................................... 2 III. Management History ......................................................................... 7 IV. Status of Existing Fisheries ............................................................. 13 V. Management of Trout Habitat .......................................................... 17 VI. Management of Wild Trout............................................................. 34 VII. Management of Cultured Trout ..................................................... 37 VIII. Management of Angler Harvest ................................................... 66 IX. Trout Management Plan Goals, Objectives and Strategies .............. 82 X. Summary of Laws and Regulations .................................................. 87 XI. Literature Cited ............................................................................... 92 I. Introduction
  • Lake Champlain Coordinates: 44°32′N 73°20′W from Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia

    Lake Champlain Coordinates: 44°32′N 73°20′W from Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia

    Lake Champlain Coordinates: 44°32′N 73°20′W From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Lake Champlain (French: lac Champlain) is a natural, Lake Champlain freshwater lake in North America, located mainly within the borders of the United States (states of Vermont and New York) but partially situated across the Canada—United States border in the Canadian province of Quebec. The New York portion of the Champlain Valley includes the eastern portions of Clinton County and Essex County. Most of this area is part of the Adirondack Park. There are recreational opportunities in the park and along the relatively undeveloped coastline of Lake Champlain. The cities of Lake Champlain near Burlington in early twilight Plattsburgh and Burlington are to the north and the village of Location New York / Vermont in USA; and Ticonderoga in the southern part of the region. The Quebec portion is located in the regional county municipalities of Le Quebec in Canada Haut- Richelieu and Brome–Missisquoi. Coordinates 44°32′N 73°20′W Primary Otter Creek, Winooski River, inflows Missisquoi River, Lamoille River, Contents Ausable River, Chazy River, Boquet River, Saranac River 1 Geology Primary Richelieu River 1.1 Hydrology outflows 1.2 Chazy Reef Catchment 21,326 km2 (8,234 sq mi) 2 History area 2.1 Colonial America and the Basin Canada, United States Revolutionary War countries 2.2 War of 1812 2.3 Modern history Max. le ngth 201 km (125 mi) 2.4 "Champ", Lake Champlain Max. width 23 km (14 mi) monster Surface 1,269 km2 (490 sq mi) 2.5 Ecology area 2.6 Railroad Average 19.5 m (64 ft) 3 Natural history depth 4 Infrastructure 122 m (400 ft) 4.1 Lake crossings Max.
  • Y E I O N Inside!

    Y E I O N Inside!

    yeion inside! FALL IN. LOVE 2.7 SECONDS. I IF YOU DON'T BELIEVE IN LOVE AT FIRST SIGHT IT'S BECAUSE YOU'VE NEVER LAID EYES ON THE JAVATM BEFORE. THIS HIGHLY RESPONSIVE CREEK BOAT MEASURES IN AT 7'9:' WEIGHS ONLY 36 LBS AND ANSWERS YOUR EVERY DESIRE WHEN PADDLING AGGRESSIVE LINES. AND WHEN IT COMES TO DROPPING OVER FALLS. ITS STABILITY AND VOLUME PROVIDE EFFORTLESS BOOFS AND PILLOW- SOFT LANDINGS.WHETHER YOU'RE 7 A BEGINNING CREEKER OR AN OLD HAND, ONCE YOU CLIMB INTO A JAVA YOU'LL KNOW WHY THEY CALL IT FALLING IN LOVE. Forum ......................................4 Features Corner Charc .................................... 8 Letters .................................... 10 When Rashfloods Hit Conservation .................................. 16 IFERC Takes Balanced Approach on Housatonic Access .................................. 18 IAccess Flash Reports Whitewater Releases on the North IFlow Study on the Cascades of the Nantahala Fork Feather IGiving the Adirondacks Back to Kayaks IUpper Ocoee Update Events .................................. 24 Canada Sechon IIf You Compete, You need to Know This IMagic is Alive and Music is Afoot Dams Kill Rivers in Canada Too! INew Method for Paddlers JimiCup 2001 IRace Results ISteep Creeks of New England, A Review Saving the Gatineau! River Voices ................................... 64 IGauley Secrets Revealed IBlazing Speedfulness s Dave's Big Adventure IWest Virginia Designed by Walt Disney INotes on a Foerfather ILivin' the Dream in South America Whitewater Love Trouble .................... 76 Cover: Jeff Prycl running a good one in Canada. Issue Date: JanuaryIFebrua~2002 Statement oi Frequencv: Published bimonthly Authorized Organization's Name and Address: American Whitewater P.O. Box 636 Prmted OII Fit3 ,pled Paper Margreb~lle,NY 12455 American Whitewater Januaty February 2002 ing enough for most normal purposes, but he does have a girlfriend and she has a gun and knows how to use it.
  • Assessment of Public Comment on Draft Trout Stream Management Plan

    Assessment of Public Comment on Draft Trout Stream Management Plan

    Assessment of public comments on draft New York State Trout Stream Management Plan OCTOBER 27, 2020 Andrew M. Cuomo, Governor | Basil Seggos, Commissioner A draft of the Fisheries Management Plan for Inland Trout Streams in New York State (Plan) was released for public review on May 26, 2020 with the comment period extending through June 25, 2020. Public comment was solicited through a variety of avenues including: • a posting of the statewide public comment period in the Environmental Notice Bulletin (ENB), • a DEC news release distributed statewide, • an announcement distributed to all e-mail addresses provided by participants at the 2017 and 2019 public meetings on trout stream management described on page 11 of the Plan [353 recipients, 181 unique opens (58%)], and • an announcement distributed to all subscribers to the DEC Delivers Freshwater Fishing and Boating Group [138,122 recipients, 34,944 unique opens (26%)]. A total of 489 public comments were received through e-mail or letters (Appendix A, numbered 1-277 and 300-511). 471 of these comments conveyed specific concerns, recommendations or endorsements; the other 18 comments were general statements or pertained to issues outside the scope of the plan. General themes to recurring comments were identified (22 total themes), and responses to these are included below. These themes only embrace recommendations or comments of concern. Comments that represent favorable and supportive views are not included in this assessment. Duplicate comment source numbers associated with a numbered theme reflect comments on subtopics within the general theme. Theme #1 The statewide catch and release (artificial lures only) season proposed to run from October 16 through March 31 poses a risk to the sustainability of wild trout populations and the quality of the fisheries they support that is either wholly unacceptable or of great concern, particularly in some areas of the state; notably Delaware/Catskill waters.
  • Nutrient Loading and Impacts in Lake Champlain – Missisquoi Bay and Lake Memphremagog

    Nutrient Loading and Impacts in Lake Champlain – Missisquoi Bay and Lake Memphremagog

    Nutrient Loading and Impacts in Lake Champlain – Missisquoi Bay and Lake Memphremagog Missisquoi Bay. IJC Collection Lake Memphremagog. IJC Collection Missisquoi Bay Cyanobacteria. Pierre Leduc Prepared by the International Joint Commission April 21, 2020 Table of Contents I. Synthesis Document ........................................................................................................................ 3 A. Context ........................................................................................................................................ 3 Cyanobacteria .................................................................................................................................. 3 Actions and Consequences of Non-action ........................................................................................ 3 The Governments’ Reference ........................................................................................................... 4 IJC’s Approach to the Reference ...................................................................................................... 5 Workshops to Review Science and Policy on Nutrient Loading ........................................................ 6 Public Meeting and Online Consultation .......................................................................................... 6 B. IJC Analysis of SAG Reports ....................................................................................................... 7 C. Common Basin Recommendations and IJC Recommendations
  • RECOVERY PLAN for TWELVE VERMONT FRESHWATER MUSSEL SPECEIS Christine O'brien Browns River Environmental Consultants 279 River Ro

    RECOVERY PLAN for TWELVE VERMONT FRESHWATER MUSSEL SPECEIS Christine O'brien Browns River Environmental Consultants 279 River Ro

    115 RECOVERY PLAN FOR TWELVE VERMONT FRESHWATER MUSSEL SPECEIS Christine O'Brien Browns River Environmental Consultants 279 River Road Underhill, Vermont 05489 Mussel Recovery Team: Mark Ferguson Nongame and Natural Heritage Program Vermont Department of Fish and Wildlife 1 Waterbury, Vermont 05671 Steve Fiske Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation Waterbury, Vermont 05671 Madeleine Lyttle U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Essex Junction, Vermont 05465 and Ellen Marsden School of Natural Resources University of Vermont Burlington, Vermont 05402 July 2002 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXCUTIVE SUMMARY ............... ................................................................................................... 2 1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................... 3 2 BACKGROUND ............................................................................................................................ 4 2.1 Mussel Reproductive Biology .......................................................................................... 4 2.3 Food Requirements .......................................................................................................... 5 3 MUSSEL SPECIES fNFORMA TION ............................................................................................ 5 3 .1 Brook floater .................................................................................................................... 5 3.2 Black sandsbell ...............................................................................................................
  • Progress Report on River Basin Water Quality Management Planning During 2010

    Progress Report on River Basin Water Quality Management Planning During 2010

    PROGRESS REPORT ON RIVER BASIN WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLANNING DURING 2010 A REPORT FOR: HOUSE & SENATE COMMITTEE ON AGRICULTURE HOUSE & SENATE COMMITTEE ON NATURAL RESOURCES AND ENERGY JANUARY 2011 PREPARED BY: VERMONT AGENCY OF NATURAL RESOURCES DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION WATER QUALITY DIVISION 103 SOUTH MAIN STREET WATERBURY, VT 05671 www.vtwaterquality.org Introduction..........................................................................................................................................................3 Section 1) Statewide Surface Water Management Strategy - a Framework for Statewide Efforts to Guide Surface Water Management.................................................................................................................................5 Protecting & Improving Surface Waters by Managing Stressors ....................................................................5 What are the 10 Major Stressors affecting Vermont’s surface waters? ...........................................................6 Using the Stressor Approach to Evaluate Program Effectiveness ...................................................................6 Tactical Basin Planning: Managing waters along a gradient of condition.......................................................6 WQD Ambient Surface Water Monitoring & Assessment Strategy................................................................6 Public Input......................................................................................................................................................6
  • Surface Waters of Vermont

    Surface Waters of Vermont

    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR FRANKLIN K. LANE, Secretary UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GEORGE OTIS SMITH, Director Water-Supply Paper 424 SURFACE WATERS OF VERMONT BY C. H. PIERCE Prepared in cooperation with the STATE OF VERMONT WASHINGTON GOVEENMENT PBINTING OFFICE 1917 ADDITIONAL COPIES OF THIS PUBLICATION MAY BK PROCURED FROM THE SUPERINTENDENT OF DOCUMENTS GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON, D. C. AT 25 CENTS PER COPY CONTENTS. Introduction.............................................................. 5 Cooperation................................................................ 8 Division of work.......................................................... 8 Definition of terms......................................................... 9 Explanation of data........................................................ 9 Accuracy of field data and computed results................................ 11 Gaging stations maintained in Vermont..................................... 12 St. Lawrence River basin................................................. 13 Lake Champlain drainage basin......................................... 13 General features................................................... 13 Gaging-station records.............................................. 14 Lake Champlain at Burlington, Vt.............................. 14 Lake Champlain outlet (Richelieu River) at Chambly, Province of Quebec.1................................................. 20 Poultney Eiver near Fair Haven, Vt............................ 25 Otter Creek at Middlebury,
  • 122 Fish Management Rule Annotated

    122 Fish Management Rule Annotated

    APPENDIX 122 TITLE 10 Conservation and Development APPENDIX CHAPTER 2. FISH Subchapter 2. Seasons, Waters, and Limits § 122. Fish Management Regulation. 1.0 Authority (a) This rule is adopted pursuant to 10 V.S.A. §4081(b). In adopting this rule, the Fish and Wildlife Board is following the policy established by the General Assembly that the protection, propagation, control, management, and conservation of fish, wildlife and fur-bearing animals in this state is in the interest of the public welfare and that the safeguarding of this valuable resource for the people of the state requires a constant and continual vigilance. (b) In accordance with 10 V.S.A. §4082, this rule is designed to maintain the best health, population and utilization levels of Vermont’s fisheries. (c) In accordance with 10 V.S.A. §4083, this rule establishes open seasons; establishes daily, season, possession limits and size limits; prescribes the manner and means of taking fish; and prescribes the manner of transportation and exportation of fish. 2.0 Purpose It is the policy of the state that the protection, propagation control, management and conservation of fish, wildlife, and fur-bearing animals in this state is in the interest of the public welfare, and that safeguarding of this valuable resource for the people of the state requires a constant and continual vigilance. 3.0 Open-Water Fishing, legal methods of taking fish 3.1 Definitions (a) Department – Vermont Department of Fish and Wildlife. (b) Commissioner –Vermont Department of Fish and Wildlife Commissioner. (c) Open-water fishing –Fishing by means of hook and line in hand or attached to a rod or other device in open water.
  • Smuggling Into Canada: How the Champlain Valley Defied Jefferson's Embargo

    Smuggling Into Canada: How the Champlain Valley Defied Jefferson's Embargo

    Wimer 1970 VOL. XXXVIII No. I VERMONT History The 'PROCEEDINGS of the VERMONT HISTORICAL SOCIETY Smuggling into Canada; How the Champlain Valley Defied Jefferson's Embargo by H. N. MULLER HEN Britain resumed open hostilities against France in 1803, the W relative tranquillity of Anglo-American relations was among the first casualties. By 1805, after Napoleon's success at AusterlilZ and Nel­ son's decisive victory at Trafalgar, the contest became a stalemate. With the French dominating the Continent and the British the sea, neither side could afford to observe the amenities of neutral rights. Britain took steps to close the loop-holes by which American merchantmen evaded the notorious orders-in-eouncil. and her navy renewed in earnest its harassing and degrading practice of impressing American citizens. III feeling and tension mounted as Anglo-American relations disinte­ grated. Then in late June 1807 tbe British frigate uopard fired on the United States Frigate Chesapeake, killing three American seamen and wounding eighteen others, and a party from the Leopard boarded the American warship and removed four alleged British deserters. The Chesapeake affair precipitated an ugly crisis. Americans, now more united in hostility toward Britain than at any time since the Revolution, demanded action from their government.l President Thomas Jefferson responded with the Embargo Act, hastily pushed through a special session of Congress and signed in December 1807. Jefferson held the illusory hope that by withholding its produce and its merchant marine, tbe United States would forcc Britain and c"en I. Burl. Th~ Uniud S/a'~. Grea/Britain, lind British Nor/II Amerjea (New Haven.
  • 2020 Press Release

    2020 Press Release

    For Release: IMMEDIATE ( 11 September 2020 ) Press Contact: Bradley Young, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (not for publication) (802) 881-8426, [email protected] LAKE CHAMPLAIN FISH AND WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT COOPERATIVE WILL TREAT FOUR RIVERS TO CONTROL SEA LAMPREY POPULATIONS The Lake Champlain Fish and Wildlife Management Cooperative (Cooperative) will be controlling larval sea lamprey populations using lampricides on four Lake Champlain tributaries during the months of September and October. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and the Vermont Fish and Wildlife Department will be treating portions of four Vermont tributaries as part of the Cooperative’s long-term sea lamprey control program for Lake Champlain: Winooski River, Missisquoi River, LaPlatte River, and Lamoille River. Federal and State permits for the application of Missisquoi River lampricide are required and obtained prior to treatments. Treatments are scheduled to begin with Winooski River on September 23rd. Treatment dates are always contingent on weather and may change with short notice. While trout and salmon are the primary beneficiaries of these efforts, lake Lamoille River sturgeon, walleye, and many other species also benefit from sea lamprey control. Sea lamprey control also generates economic activity by increasing angling opportunities and the time that boaters, anglers, and Winooski River their families spend in the Lake Champlain area. Burlington Annual assessments continue to show improvements to the lake’s fish LaPlatte River populations, with lower wounding rates and increased numbers of older larger salmon and lake trout. However, wounding rates remain above target levels. Ongoing program initiatives to enhance the effectiveness of control efforts are underway that will further reduce the sea lamprey population and reduce their impacts on Lake Champlain’s fish populations.