DOCSLIB.ORG

The Illegal Overthrow of the Hawaiian Kingdom and the Struggle for Hawai‘I’S Water Resources Ikaika Lowe University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Illegal Overthrow of the Hawaiian Kingdom and the Struggle for Hawai‘I’S Water Resources Ikaika Lowe University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa Mānoa Horizons Volume 3 | Issue 1 Article 4 11-15-2018 The Lāhui Strikes Back: The Illegal Overthrow of the Hawaiian Kingdom and the Struggle for Hawai‘i’s Water Resources Ikaika Lowe University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa Follow this and additional works at: https://kahualike.manoa.hawaii.edu/horizons Part of the Indigenous Studies Commons Recommended Citation Lowe, Ikaika (2018) "The Lāhui Strikes Back: The Illegal Overthrow of the Hawaiian Kingdom and the Struggle for Hawai‘i’s Water Resources," Mānoa Horizons: Vol. 3 : Iss. 1 , Article 4. Available at: https://kahualike.manoa.hawaii.edu/horizons/vol3/iss1/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Kahualike. It has been accepted for inclusion in Mānoa Horizons by an authorized editor of Kahualike. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Lāhui Strikes Back The Illegal Overthrow of the Hawaiian Kingdom and the Struggle for Hawai‘i’s Water Resources Ikaika Lowe The Native Hawaiian Student Services Mentor: Kamana Beamer “If we are ever to have peace and annexation the first thing to do is obliterate the past.”1 These words were said by Samuel Damon who assisted in the 1893 Illegal Overthrow of the Hawaiian Kingdom. The Overthrow was a turning point in history, not just for Kānaka ‘Ōiwi or Hawaiians, but also the management of water in the islands. In this paper I will analyze a few key ways the illegal overthrow of the Hawaiian Kingdom enabled the sugar plantation industries to acquire and control vast amounts of Hawai‘i’s water resources. I begin this conversation by looking at the relationship water has with Kānaka ‘Ōiwi and how water was managed during the pre-arrival of Captain James Cook. I will also analyze a few of the laws that the Hawaiian Kingdom passed towards the management of water, then look at the brief history of how the sugar plantations were financed and managed in the early years towards the latter half of the 19th century. Sta- tistics of water usage pre and post overthrow will be used, with a short history of the water ditch systems that were used to transport water to the sugar plantations. I will then end it with an analysis of the laws during the Provisional Government, Republic of Hawai‘i and Territory of Hawai‘i that dealt with water management that enabled the accumula- tion of power within the sugar industry by a small group of corporations. n the Hawaiian language, the word wai means water, the who lived in the most isolated place in the world to regard wa- Iword for waiwai means value, wealth or importance. Kānāwai ter in such high importance. Water is also viewed as a kino lau2 means law or regulations. All these important words have the or the embodiment of a god, in this case the god Kāne3. There word wai within them, thus it would make sense for a people 2 Mary Kawena Pukui and Samuel Elbert, Hawaiian Dictionary (Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press, 1987), 153, “Many forms 1 Damon, Correspondence, November 26, 1895. Series 424, vol. taken by a supernatural body.” 4, Council of State, Hawai‘i State Archives, Honolulu. 3 Ibid, 128, “The leading of the four great Hawaiian gods.” This paper was part of a research mentorship project that was conducted out of Native Hawaiian Student Services as part of the ‘Ōiwi Undergraduate research fellowship. I want to say Mahalo to Kumu Kamana Beamers mentorship, ‘Ilima Long, The NHSS Crew & The Hawai‘i State Archives for the help and support. Mānoa Horizons, Vol. 3, 2018, pp. 13–20 Copyright © 2018 by the University of Hawai‘i at Mānoa 13 Manoa Horizons 3.indb 13 10/11/2018 11:19:51 AM 14 Mānoa Horizons Vol. 3, Fall 2018 are 400,000 gods4 in the Hawaiian pantheon. Every plant and ahupua‘a12, or ‘ili13. The konohiki or land manager of each area animal are an embodiment of a god. So are clouds, rain, the would subdivide the water amongst the people for food culti- movement of lava, the currents of ocean and air. The kānaka vation. The number of people who worked the ‘auwai or land ‘Ōiwi5 or Hawaiian world view comes from the great cosmo- determined the quantity of water given. When it was someone’s gonic genealogy known as the Kumulipo. Papa6 and Wākea7 time in the water rotation they would go with the luna wai, a who are both gods give birth to the Hawaiian islands, after- superintendent to the water head or dam to see what the condi- wards Wākea then has a child with Ho‘ohokūkalani.8 It was tion of it was. It was his job to clear any obstructions that might stillborn, but where it’s grave was, the first taro plant grew. harm the flow of water and fix and damages to the main ‘auwai They then had a second child that was named Hāloa, and he and dam. If not, then that person would not get any rights to became the first human or ‘ōiwi born in these islands. This the water until he finishes his obligations. This concept also relationship between ‘ōiwi, taro and these islands show a fa- goes to any family or individual who doesn’t come to the ‘auwai milial connection between the oldest-youngest siblings. It also cleanings or dam repairs.14 Water is the most precious resource shows a kuleana or cultural obligation for ‘ōiwi to mālama the in an island society and breaking the rules to regulate water can resources in these islands and in this case, water. lead to heavy consequences. If someone was caught breaking a In traditional times the, “inalienable title to water rights dam, that person was to, “. be slain by the shareholders of that in relation to land use is a conception that had no place in old dam, and his body put in the breach he had made, as a tempo- Hawaiian thinking . Water, whether for irrigation, for drink- rary stopgap, thus serving as a warning to others who might be ing, or other domestic purposes, was something that ‘belonged’ inclined to act similarly.”15 to Kāneikawaiola . The ali‘i or chiefs in old Hawaiian thinking We have seen the relationship that water has to ‘ōiwi and and practice did not exercise personal dominion, but channeled how it was managed in traditional times and now move into dominion. In other words, they were a trustee.”9 The manage- looking at some of the laws that were passed during the time ment of water was used mostly for taro, which is the staple crop of Hawaiian Kingdom in relation to wai. and grown in wetland and dryland areas. Wetland kalo were Twenty-one years after King Kamehameha the First grown in a lo‘i10, that was fed through an ‘auwai or water course had united all the islands under one government the Hawai- that diverted water from the mainstream that generally went ian Kingdom in 1840 drafted its first written constitution or from mauka to makai, which fed water to the lo‘i, that eventu- “Kūmū Kānāwai” that paid attention to the importance of wai. ally returned back into the main stream. The management of It stated the origins of the Hawaiian kingdom and the princi- the ‘auwai was done under the authority of the konohiki11 in a ples founded by it were, that Kamehameha I was the founder of the Kingdom, and all the resources within it, “it was not his 4 David Malo, Hawaiian Antiquites: Mo‘olelo Hawai‘i, (Bishop own private property. It belonged to the chiefs and people in Museum Press: Honolulu, 1951), 85. common, of whom Kamehameha I was the head, and had the 5 Jonothan Kamakawiwa‘ole Osorio, “What Kine Hawaiian Are management of the landed property,”16 such as a trustee. As You?,”A Mo’olelo about Nationhood, Race, History, and the Con- water is one of those resources, it is not owned by anyone, not temporary Sovereignty Movement in Hawai‘i, The Contemporary even the king, but shared amongst the citizens of the Kingdom Pacific, 13.2 (2001) 359–379, “Some people insist that Hawaiian and was managed by the king for the betterment of all. As we denotes mere residence rather than ancestry, like Californian or Texan. Others insist that whether we are called Hawaiian, Kanaka Maoli, or ‘Oiwi, we are referring to the Native people of Hawai‘i.” 12 Lorenz Gonschor and Kamanamaikalani Beamer, “Toward 6 Lilikalā Kame‘eleihiwa, Native Land and Foreign Desires: Pehea an Inventory of Ahupua‘a in the Hawaiian Kingdom: A survey Lā E Pono Ai?, (Honolulu: Bishop Museum Press: 1992), 23–24, of Nineteenth and early Twentieth-Century Cartographic and Ar- “Skyfather.” chival Records of the Island of Hawai‘i,” The Hawaiian Journal of 7 Ibid., “Earth Mother.” History, Vol. 48 (2014): 79, “Culturally appropriate, ecologically 8 Ibid., “Star mother or the one who generates stars in the sky.” aligned and place specific unit with access to diverse resources.” 9 E.S. Craighill Handy and Elizabeth Handy with the collabora- An example is the ahupua‘a of Kāne‘ohe on the east side of O‘ahu. tion of Mary Kawena Pukui, Native planters in old Hawaii: their life, 13 David Malo, Hawaiian Antiquites: Mo‘olelo Hawai‘i, 16, “An lore, and environment, (Bishop Museum Press: Honolulu, 1972). ahupua‘a was then divided up into smaller pieces such as ‘ili.” An 10 Mary Kawena Pukui and Samuel Elbert, Hawaiian Dictionary example is the ‘ili of Pālolo, that is within the ahupua‘a of Waikīkī (Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press, 1987), 209, “Irrigated ter- on O‘ahu.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Hawaiʻi's Big Five
    Hawaiʻi’s Big Five (Plus 2) “By 1941, every time a native Hawaiian switched on his lights, turned on the gas or rode on a street car, he paid a tiny tribute into Big Five coffers.” (Alexander MacDonald, 1944) The story of Hawaii’s largest companies dominates Hawaiʻi’s economic history. Since the early/mid- 1800s, until relatively recently, five major companies emerged and dominated the Island’s economic framework. Their common trait: they were focused on agriculture - sugar. They became known as the Big Five: C. Brewer (1826;) Theo H. Davies (1845;) Amfac - starting as Hackfeld & Company (1849;) Castle & Cooke (1851) and Alexander & Baldwin (1870.) C. Brewer & Co. Amfac Founded: October 1826; Capt. James Hunnewell Founded: 1849; Heinrich Hackfeld and Johann (American Sea Captain, Merchant; Charles Carl Pflueger (German Merchants) Brewer was American Merchant) Incorporated: 1897 (H Hackfeld & Co;) American Incorporated: February 7, 1883 Factors Ltd, 1918 Theo H. Davies & Co. Castle & Cooke Founded: 1845; James and John Starkey, and Founded: 1851; Samuel Northrup Castle and Robert C. Janion (English Merchants; Theophilus Amos Starr Cooke (American Mission Secular Harris Davies was Welch Merchant) Agents) Incorporated: January 1894 Incorporated: 1894 Alexander & Baldwin Founded: 1870; Samuel Thomas Alexander & Henry Perrine Baldwin (American, Sons of Missionaries) Incorporated: 1900 © 2017 Ho‘okuleana LLC The Making of the Big Five Some suggest they were started by the missionaries. Actually, only Castle & Cooke has direct ties to the mission. However, Castle ran the ‘depository’ and Cooke was a teacher, neither were missionary ministers. Alexander & Baldwin were sons of missionaries, but not a formal part of the mission.
    [Show full text]
  • German Sugar's Sticky Fingers Frederick Bernays Wiener Overshadowed by Aloha Tower, and on the Site of One of the Twin 21-Story
    German Sugar's Sticky Fingers Frederick Bernays Wiener Overshadowed by Aloha Tower, and on the site of one of the twin 21-story Amfac Towers on the Fort Street Mall, there originated one of the most memorable and unusual incidents of Hawaiian history. Amfac Inc., now a billion dollar conglomerate, is the successor at one remove to Hackfeld & Co. Ltd., which prior to 1918 was the center of German influence in the Pacific. Seized by the Alien Property Custodian in that year, Hackfeld & Co. was sold to a new group, American Factors Ltd. Beginning in 1920, the expropriated former stockholders recovered some or all of their seized property, after which they sued the purchasers, contending that the sale price fixed in 1918 had been grossly inadequate, that it was the result of a business conspiracy masquerading as patriotism. After eight years of struggle in the courts, where all their contentions were rejected, some of the former stockholders then sought to recoup their claimed losses from the United States Government. In the course of defending those new proceedings, the Government embarked on a relentless search, laboriously assembling and arranging bits and pieces of evidence from many persons in widely scattered places. Subsequently the United States established in those and further lawsuits, extending over another nine years, that the principal earlier recoveries had involved extensive and artfully contrived frauds; that a subordinate official, whose apparently fortuitous appearance on the scene was actually of determinative weight, had earlier been corrupted; and that two future Chief Justices of the United States, Secretary of State Charles Evans Hughes and Attorney General Harlan Fiske Stone, had each made a controlling mistake of law.
    [Show full text]
  • Kapa'a, Waipouli, Olohena, Wailua and Hanamā'ulu Island of Kaua'i
    CULTURAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FOR THE KAPA‘A RELIEF ROUTE; KAPA‘A, WAIPOULI, OLOHENA, WAILUA AND HANAMĀ‘ULU ISLAND OF KAUA‘I by K. W. Bushnell, B.A. David Shideler, M.A. and Hallett H. Hammatt, PhD. Prepared for Kimura International by Cultural Surveys Hawai‘i, Inc. May 2004 Acknowledgements ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Cultural Surveys Hawai‘i wishes to acknowledge, first and foremost, the kūpuna who willingly took the time to be interviewed and graciously shared their mana‘o: Raymond Aiu, Valentine Ako, George Hiyane, Kehaulani Kekua, Beverly Muraoka, Alice Paik, and Walter (Freckles) Smith Jr. Special thanks also go to several individuals who shared information for the completion of this report including Randy Wichman, Isaac Kaiu, Kemamo Hookano, Aletha Kaohi, LaFrance Kapaka-Arboleda, Sabra Kauka, Linda Moriarty, George Mukai, Jo Prigge, Healani Trembath, Martha Yent, Jiro Yukimura, Joanne Yukimura, and Taka Sokei. Interviews were conducted by Tina Bushnell. Background research was carried out by Tina Bushnell, Dr. Vicki Creed and David Shideler. Acknowledgements also go to Mary Requilman of the Kaua‘i Historical Society and the Bishop Museum Archives staff who were helpful in navigating their respective collections for maps and photographs. Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................. 1 A. Scope of Work............................................................................................................ 1 B. Methods......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Hawaii Stories of Change Kokua Hawaii Oral History Project
    Hawaii Stories of Change Kokua Hawaii Oral History Project Gary T. Kubota Hawaii Stories of Change Kokua Hawaii Oral History Project Gary T. Kubota Hawaii Stories of Change Kokua Hawaii Oral History Project by Gary T. Kubota Copyright © 2018, Stories of Change – Kokua Hawaii Oral History Project The Kokua Hawaii Oral History interviews are the property of the Kokua Hawaii Oral History Project, and are published with the permission of the interviewees for scholarly and educational purposes as determined by Kokua Hawaii Oral History Project. This material shall not be used for commercial purposes without the express written consent of the Kokua Hawaii Oral History Project. With brief quotations and proper attribution, and other uses as permitted under U.S. copyright law are allowed. Otherwise, all rights are reserved. For permission to reproduce any content, please contact Gary T. Kubota at [email protected] or Lawrence Kamakawiwoole at [email protected]. Cover photo: The cover photograph was taken by Ed Greevy at the Hawaii State Capitol in 1971. ISBN 978-0-9799467-2-1 Table of Contents Foreword by Larry Kamakawiwoole ................................... 3 George Cooper. 5 Gov. John Waihee. 9 Edwina Moanikeala Akaka ......................................... 18 Raymond Catania ................................................ 29 Lori Treschuk. 46 Mary Whang Choy ............................................... 52 Clyde Maurice Kalani Ohelo ........................................ 67 Wallace Fukunaga ..............................................
    [Show full text]
  • U·Rvl-T University Microfilms International a Bell & Howell Information Company 300 North Zeeb Road, Ann Arbor, M148106-1346 USA 313/761-4700 800/521-0600
    INFORMATION TO USERS The most advanced technology has been used to photo­ graph and reproduce this manuscript from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copysubmitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, ifunauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are re­ produced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand cornerand continuingfrom leftto right in equal sections with small overlaps. Each original is also photographed in one exposure and is included in reduced form at the back of the book. These are also available as one exposure on a standard 35mm slide or as a 17" x 23" black and white photographic print for an additional charge. Photographs included in the original manuscript have been reproduced xerographically in this copy. Higher quality 6" x 9" black and white photographic prints are available for any photographs or illustrations appearing in this copyfor an additional charge. Contact UMI directly to order. U·rvl-T University Microfilms International A Bell & Howell Information Company 300 North Zeeb Road, Ann Arbor, M148106-1346 USA 313/761-4700 800/521-0600 ---._-._---_.• ------------- Order Number 9018995 High tea at Halekulani: Feminist theory and American clubwomen Misangyi Watts, Margit, Ph.D.
    [Show full text]
  • James D. Dole and the 1932 Failure of the Hawaiian Pineapple Company
    richard a. hawkins James D. Dole and the 1932 Failure of the Hawaiian Pineapple Company There are fewer case studies of entrepreneurial failure than of entrepreneurial success. The records of failed businesses usually do not survive. The Hawaiian Pineapple Co. is an example of a failed company where the records survived. In 1932 a new company was organized that acquired the failed company’s name and assets. One of the assets was the brand name “Dole”. Today “Dole” is one of the leading brand names in fresh and processed fruit and vegetables. The origin of the brand name is the eponymous James Drummond Dole, who founded the Hawaiian Pineapple Company in 1901, which is one of the predecessors of today’s Dole Food Company, Inc. It is ironic that his name has survived as an international brand name because Dole lost control of his company in 1932, in what was the American Territory of Hawai‘i’s largest inter-war business failure. This article explores and analyzes the reasons for the failure of the Hawaiian Pine- apple Co. Dole migrated from his native Massachusetts to the Hawaiian Islands in late 1899 to take up the cultivation of coffee at a home- stead settlement. However, at the time coffee turned out not to be a Richard Hawkins is Senior Lecturer in History at the School of Humanities, University of Wolverhampton, England. He began his research on Hawai‘i’s pineapple industry as a doc- toral student in the early 1980s. Since the completion of his doctoral dissertation in 1986, he has continued to work on the economic and social history of Hawai‘i.
    [Show full text]
  • Layoff Beats Pension EDITORIAL COMMENT Lihue Gives 40-Yr
    Forced |Layoff Beats Pension EDITORIAL COMMENT Lihue Gives 40-Yr. Worker Watch-$4J6 By Correspondence Why Burns Won LIHUE—When Kozo Yata was forced to retire last October, a Two years ago when a faction of the Democratic Lihue plantation boss told him, Party including Burns, Mitsuyuki Kido, Dr. Ernest Mu­ “Too bad, Yata, you poho. You rai, Daniel Inouye and others emerged as the dominant little more catch gold watch. Only faction, the event was labeled a victory for the mod­ few months more you make 40 erates and right-wingers. The left wing (and that years with plantation.” means union labor in the parlance of the dailies) was These few words give a fair description of Lihue Plantation tossed out. Co.’s policy to retire veteran em­ The truth was that organized labor, as such, stayed ployes on “peanuts,” according to away from the convention. workers. But there were many un­ The company made Yata retire ion men among the dele­ two months before the turn of the year, when his union, ILWU gates from the outside is­ Local 142, was negotiating a con­ lands and it is true that tract with provisions for a pen- they voted generally on (m^d on page 5) the other side from the Burns faction. MR. VALDEZ Why, then, did many Cherry Blossom, Laid Off One Day From Pension of these same union men, serving as delegates to the Democratic convention Narcissus Shows "Sam's Statehood Safari" Slapped By last weekend, go along with Burns and many of Still In Black Slacks Store; Hui Makaala Rejected the faction they opposed Rumors that neither the Cher­ Two of the newspapers invited the Farrington paper would not two years before? ry Blossom Festival nor the' Nar­ to send representatives and one send anyone “at the taxpayers’ ex­ cissus Festival will be held next veterans’ group went on record pense.” The answer lies in the year because of financial hardship two factions that devel­ this week as refusing to partici­ .
    [Show full text]
  • Pesticides in Paradise Hawai‘I’S Health & Environment at Risk
    PESTICIDES IN PARADISE HAWAI‘I’S HEALTH & ENVIRONMENT AT RISK HAWAI‘I M AY 2 0 1 5 ABOUT CENTER FOR FOOD SAFETY CENTER FOR FOOD SAFETY (CFS) is a non-profit public interest and environmental advocacy membership organization established in 1997 for the purpose of challenging harmful food production technologies and promoting sustainable alternatives. CFS combines multiple tools and strategies in pur- suing its goals, including litigation and legal petitions for rulemaking, legal support for various sustainable agriculture and food safety constituencies, as well as public education, grassroots organizing and media outreach. For over a decade, CFS has worked alongside Hawai‘i organizations and advocates to advance the vision of a safer, healthier food system. Since opening the Honolulu office in 2014, CFS has provided legal and scientific advice to activists, worked with the legislature, convened workshops and conferences, supported local farming, secured funding for our partners, and grown its Hawai‘i True Food network membership. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Authors: Bill Freese, Ashley Lukens, Ph.D. and Alexis Anjomshoaa Contributing Author: Sharon Perrone Copy Editing: Megan Blazak and Sharon Perrone Legal Consultant: Sylvia Wu Design: Sharon Perrone Figures: Patrick Riggs Report Advisor: Andrew Kimbrell Special Contributor: Fern A. Rosenstiel To view the Executive Summary and Abridged Report or access this report as a PDF, visit Center for Food Safety online at: www.centerforfoodsafety.org/reports 2 | HAWAI‘I CENTER FOR FOOD SAFETY PESTICIDES IN
    [Show full text]
  • Ownership of Corporations in Hawaii in I946-Is Limited in Scope
    A STUDY OF 'OWNERSHIP OF CORPORATIONS IN HAWAII HAWAIIAN ECONOMIC FOUNDATION 1015 Bishop Street, Honolulu, Hawaii PREFACE This is the first of a series of studies of various basic aspects of the econ­ omy of the Hawaiian Islands. These studies by the HAWAIIAN ECONOMIC FOUNDATION are designed to achieve the maximum degree of objective understanding of the Islands' problems and prospects-understanding on a community-wide basis in Hawaii, in mainland United States of which Hawaii is an integral part,·and in other lands in the Pacific area. The FOUNDATION is a non-profit membership association. The scope of the concept of its activities is indicated by the fact that among objec­ tives set forth in its By-Laws are to aid in "making the Islands a progres­ sively better place in which to live and work," and in "strengthening the position of Hawaii in the further development of the Pacific area." It is the hope of the FOUNDATION that this and succeeding studies will make a contribution to Hawaiian progress. HAWAIIAN ECONOMIC FOUNDATION, Claude A. Jagger, President September 15, 1948 I INDEX PAGE Summary 3- 4 I Number of Corporations 5- 9 II Size of Corporations 10-12 III Ownership of Corporations 1.3-17 IV Sugar Plantation Agencies 18-32 Alexander & Baldwin, Ltd. 20-22 American Factors, Ltd. 23-25 C. Brewer & Co., Ltd. 26-28 Castle & Cooke, Ltd. 29-3 1 Theo. H . Davies & Co., Ltd. 32-34 Supplementary Note 35 2 SUMMARY This study-Ownership of Corporations in Hawaii in I946-is limited in scope. It marks only a beginning.
    [Show full text]
  • PM PRICE MF01/PC06 Plus Postage
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 196 794 SO 013 0 B3 AUTHOR Kinoshita, Jane TITLE Modern History of Hawaii: Instructional Materials/Resources for High School Modern History of Hawaii. INSTITUTION Hawaii State Dept. of Education, Honolulu. Office of Instructional Services. PUB DATE Nov 77 NOTE 130p. PM PRICE MF01/PC06 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS Economic Development; Futures (of Society); *Modern History: Politics: Secondary Education; Social Change: Social History; Social Problems: *State History: Units of Study IDENTIFIERS *Hawaii ABSTRACT This resource guide contains seven units of study on the modern history of Hawaii. The one-semester course for use at the high school level is a study of the historical development of modern Hawaii within the context of social, political, and economic growth and development of the state. An introductory unit attempts to anticipate future problems and examines alternative futures for Hawaii. In Unit I, "Expansion of Plantation Agriculture," students inquire into Hawaii's economic history up to 1941 by examining the "Big Five" and labor unrest after annexation. Unit II, "The Road to Territorial Rule," attempts' to examine the political history of Hawaii from the downfall of the monarchy to 1941. The social history of Hawaii up to 1941 is examined in Unit III, "The Beginning of a New Society." Students investigate the economic, political, and social changes that the war brought tc Hawaii and its people in Unit IV, "Hawaii: During and After World War II." Unit V, "Government and Politics," examines the issue of statehood and constitutional revision, politics, and political issues that are facing the people of Hawaii. Unit VI, "Hawaii's People Today," examines current social issues.
    [Show full text]
  • John Dominis Holt the Watumull Foundation Oral
    JOHN DOMINIS HOLT THE WATUMULL FOUNDATION ORAL HISTORY PROJECT JOHN DOMINIS HOLT (1919 - ) John Dominis Holt IV, well-known writer and publisher, relates some of the family background of his English, Hawaiian, and Tahitian ancestors. He describes a family history that includes prominent shipbuilders of England and alii women of Hawaii. He recalls his life growing up during a period of transition not only for his family but for Hawaii itself. He vividly recounts stories of his parents, grandparents, aunts and uncles, and tells of their attitudes and life styles. Mr. Holt discusses early influences on the Hawaiian culture and changes that occurred, particularly during the nineteenth century, in the Islands. His experiences and studies on the mainland, his return to Hawaii, his reassessment of Hawaii and its culture and his writing and publishing accomplishments are recounted. Mr. Holt includes his genealogy in both narrative and chart form as an addendum. ©1987 The Watumull Foundation, Oral History Project 2051 Young Street, Honolulu, Hawaii 96826 All rights reserved. This transcript, or any part thereof, may not be reproduced in any form without the permission of the Watumull Foundation. INTERVIEW WITH JOHN DOMINIS HOLT In the reception room of his Topgallant Publishing Company, Kakaako, Honolulu, Hawaii October 30, 1986 H: John Dominis Holt S: Alice Sinesky, Interviewer H: Well, it is October 30, Thursday morning, a warmish Thursday morning in Honolulu in old Kakaako. I'm sitting in my reception room where I have conferences down in Kakaako on property that used to be the home of my great-grandparents, Owen Jones Holt and Hanakaulani 0 Kamamalu.
    [Show full text]
  • How King Sugar Rules in Hawaii by Ray Stannard Baker
    HE AlVIERICAN _-\.GAZINE ~\ o'vember 1911 LXXIII 1 ~ A~[ERIC:\~ MAGAZINE I 1'1'11111'111 ,,11/11' IlJillh 111'ly ,,1111;111111'111'1111"1' l'l'IlIUl'y; (he IIri~(ocrat is a financier rather Iii 111111111111111111111 iliid itll ill"lIlV of ,~,200 thall a farmer. '11 1 '1" 11'1111 wil II Illl'il' f:lIl1ilil:s li\'e ill We thus have over fifty corporations con­ , "I \ 1"111 lillll' l·il'I;II·,"~' IIr camps dolled lrolling the sugar land of the Territory; but 1'1111 11\""1 IIIl' J~rl'a' I'slatl', Thirty-live these corporations themselves are grouped I" 11111 'illll,' 1'1111 "Il the hills abo\'L: the together, so that in all essential matters they WONDERFUL HAWAII 1IIIIIIIIi'''I. iliid 111:;1 yl'lIr the tolal sugar pro­ act as a unit. • 1'1'''11 II'II:'~~,() 0 Illll~. vVhilc this is the In the first place they are organized in the A World Experiment Station I i \ I' .I "I I Ill' . powerful Sugar Plant­ plpI" d I '''Il,'; , 1l;~jjj~~jj~~~~i~~~~=~=~=~~ • 11'11 a 1'(' • ers' Associa­ BY RAY STANNARD BAKER III I II \ ,,j 1\('l's tion, which, i A1/liJor of " The Spiri/lut! Unrol," "Follo'Wing the Color Line, " elr, II,,' ,Iii lIds while it. is Ii III pril­ nominally a 1 r II III voluntary ILLUSTRATED WITH PHOTOGRAPHS l II organization, I til" " , I" II S exercises the 1. How King Sligar Rules in Hawaiz I _1l1;;11' 1111- profou n des t 11,\,1111' ;111 d control over lid, " l'ITy industry in AWAII has been"called, and justly "The· past tive years have witnessed an "I I he the islands.
    [Show full text]